Search

Indoor air can spread pathogens, which can be removed/inactivated by a variety of means in healthcare and other settings. We quantitatively assessed if air decontamination could also simultaneously reduce environmental surface contamination in the same setting. Two types of vegetative bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii), and a bacterial spore‐former (Geobacillus stearothermophilus) were tested as representative airborne bacteria. They were separately aerosolized with a Collison nebulizer into a 24‐m3 aerobiology chamber and air samples collected with a programmable slit‐to‐agar sampler. Settling airborne particles were collected on culture plates placed at, and collected from, five different locations on the floor of the chamber with a custom‐built remote plate‐placement and ‐retriever system. Experimentally contaminated air in the chamber was decontaminated for 45 min with a device based on HEPA filtration and UV light. The plates were incubated and CFU counted. The device reduced the viability levels of all tested bacteria in the air by >3 log10 (>99·9%) in 45 min. Based on two separate tests, the average reductions in surface contamination for S. aureus, A. baumannii and G. stearothermophilus were respectively, 97, 87 and 97%. We thus showed that air decontamination could substantially and simultaneously reduce the levels of surface contamination in the same setting irrespective of the type of pathogen present. Significance and Impact of the Study: The innovative and generic test protocol described can quantitatively assess the reduction in environmental surface contamination from microbial decontamination of indoor air in the same setting. This added advantage from air decontamination has implications for infection prevention and control in healthcare and other settings without the need for additional expense or effort. Continuous operation of an air decontamination device, such as the one tested here, can lead to ongoing reductions in pathogens in air and on environmental surfaces. Significance and Impact of the Study: The innovative and generic test protocol described can quantitatively assess the reduction in environmental surface contamination from microbial decontamination of indoor air in the same setting. This added advantage from air decontamination has implications for infection prevention and control in healthcare and other settings without the need for additional expense or effort. Continuous operation of an air decontamination device, such as the one tested here, can lead to ongoing reductions in pathogens in air and on environmental surfaces. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bacterial endospores (spores) have a higher intrinsic resistance to microbicides as compared to other microbial forms, most likely due to their impermeable outer layers and low water content. Though structural differences between the spores of various bacterial species may account for observed variations in their resistance to microbicides, flaws in methods for testing the sporicidal activity of microbicides often exaggerate the differences. This has major implications when considering the selection of one or more surrogates to assess microbicides against clinically relevant spore-formers such as Clostridium difficile. The mounting significance of Cl. difficile as a pathogen is leading to a corresponding increase in the number of commercially available microbicidal formulations claiming activity against its spores without proper differentiation between the product's sporistatic and sporicidal actions. In this review we critically assess the situation and the implications of product claims on the field use of microbicidal products. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While there is good epidemiological evidence for foods as vehicles for norovirus transmission, the precise means of spread and its control remain unknown. The feline calicivirus was used as a surrogate for noroviruses to study infectious virus transfer between hands and selected types of foods and environmental surfaces. Assessment of the potential of selected topicals in interrupting such virus transfer was also made. Ten microliters of inoculum of feline calicivirus deposited onto each fingerpad of adult subjects was allowed to air dry and the contaminated area on individual fingerpads was pressed (10 s at a pressure of 0.2 to 0.4 kg/cm²) onto 1-cm-diameter disks of ham, lettuce, or brushed stainless steel. The virus remaining on the donor and that transferred to the recipient surfaces was eluted and plaque assayed. Virus transfer to clean hands from experimentally contaminated disks of ham, lettuce, and stainless steel was also tested. Nearly 46 ± 20.3, 18 ± 5.7, and 13 ± 3.6% of infectious virus was transferred from contaminated fingerpads to ham, lettuce, and metal disks, respectively. In contrast, approximately 6 ± 1.8, 14 ± 3.5, and 7 ± 1.9% virus transfer occurred, respectively, from ham, lettuce, and metal disks to hands. One-way analysis of variance test showed that pretreatment (washing) of the fingerpads either with water or with both topical agent and water significantly (P < 0.05) reduced virus transfer to ≤0.9%, as compared with ≤2.3 and ≤3.4% transfer following treatments with either 75% (vol/vol) ethanol or a commercial hand gel containing 62% ethanol, respectively. Despite wide variations in virus transfer among the targeted items used, intervention agents tested reduced virus transfer significantly (P < 0.05) when compared with that without such treatments (71 ± 8.9%). These findings should help in a better assessment of the potential for cross-contamination of foods during handling and also assist in developing more effective approaches to foodborne spread of norovirus infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]