Search

Distributed agreement-based (DAB) systems use common distributed agreement protocols such as leader election and consensus as building blocks for their target functionality. While automated verification for DAB systems is undecidable in general, recent work identifies a large class of DAB systems for which verification is efficiently-decidable. Unfortunately, the conditions characterizing such a class can be opaque and non-intuitive, and can pose a significant challenge to system designers trying to model their systems in this class. In this paper, we present a synthesis-driven tool, Cinnabar, to help system designers building DAB systems "fit" their intended designs into an efficiently-decidable class. In particular, starting from an initial sketch provided by the designer, Cinnabar generates sketch completions using a counterexample-guided procedure. The core technique relies on a compact encoding of a set of related counterexamples. We demonstrate Cinnabar's effectiveness by successfully and efficiently synthesizing completions for a variety of interesting DAB systems., TACAS 2023

Inspired by distributed applications that use consensus or other agreement protocols for global coordination, we define a new computational model for parameterized systems that is based on a general global synchronization primitive and allows for global transition guards. Our model generalizes many existing models in the literature, including broadcast protocols and guarded protocols. We show that reachability properties are decidable for systems without guards, and give sufficient conditions under which they remain decidable in the presence of guards. Furthermore, we investigate cutoffs for reachability properties and provide sufficient conditions for small cutoffs in a number of cases that are inspired by our target applications., Conference version published at CAV 2020; this version contains a correction of guard-compatibility conditions C2.1 and C2.2

Cryptographic techniques have the potential to enable distrusting parties to collaborate in fundamentally new ways, but their practical implementation poses numerous challenges. An important class of such cryptographic techniques is known as Secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC). Developing Secure MPC applications in realistic scenarios requires extensive knowledge spanning multiple areas of cryptography and systems. And while the steps to arrive at a solution for a particular application are often straightforward, it remains difficult to make the implementation efficient, and tedious to apply those same steps to a slightly different application from scratch. Hence, it is an important problem to design platforms for implementing Secure MPC applications with minimum effort and using techniques accessible to non-experts in cryptography. In this paper, we present the HACCLE (High Assurance Compositional Cryptography: Languages and Environments) toolchain, specifically targeted to MPC applications. HACCLE contains an embedded domain-specific language Harpoon, for software developers without cryptographic expertise to write MPC-based programs, and uses Lightweight Modular Staging (LMS) for code generation. Harpoon programs are compiled into acyclic circuits represented in HACCLE's Intermediate Representation (HIR) that serves as an abstraction over different cryptographic protocols such as secret sharing, homomorphic encryption, or garbled circuits. Implementations of different cryptographic protocols serve as different backends of our toolchain. The extensible design of HIR allows cryptographic experts to plug in new primitives and protocols to realize computation. And the use of standard metaprogramming techniques lowers the development effort significantly.

The last decade has sparked several valiant efforts in deductive verification of distributed agreement protocols such as consensus and leader election. Oddly, there have been far fewer verification efforts that go beyond the core protocols and target applications that are built on top of agreement protocols. This is unfortunate, as agreement-based distributed services such as data stores, locks, and ledgers are ubiquitous and potentially permit modular, scalable verification approaches that mimic their modular design. We address this need for verification of distributed agreement-based systems through our novel modeling and verification framework, QuickSilver, that is not only modular, but also fully automated. The key enabling feature of QuickSilver is our encoding of abstractions of verified agreement protocols that facilitates modular, decidable, and scalable automated verification. We demonstrate the potential of QuickSilver by modeling and efficiently verifying a series of tricky case studies, adapted from real-world applications, such as a data store, a lock service, a surveillance system, a pathfinding algorithm for mobile robots, and more., Accepted at OOPSLA 2021

The goal of program repair is to automatically fix programs to meet a specification. We propose a new specification mechanism, direct manipulation, in which the programmer can visualize the trace of a buggy program on a failing input and convey the intended program behavior by manipulating variable values at some location. The repair problem is to find a program that, on the same input, reaches the location identified by the programmer with variable values equal to the manipulated ones. Since a single program execution under-specifies the overall program behavior, we augment our repair problem with quantitative objectives to find the program that agrees with the specification and is closest to the original one with respect to some distance. We formalize the repair problem, build a program repair tool JDial based on the Sketch synthesizer, and show the effectiveness of JDial on representative buggy benchmarks from introductory programming assignments.

Given a multithreaded program written assuming a friendly, non-preemptive scheduler, the goal of synchronization synthesis is to automatically insert synchronization primitives to ensure that the modified program behaves correctly, even with a preemptive scheduler. In this work, we focus on the quality of the synthesized solution: we aim to infer synchronization placements that not only ensure correctness, but also meet some quantitative objectives such as optimal program performance on a given computing platform. The key step that enables solution optimization is the construction of a set of global constraints over synchronization placements such that each model of the constraints set corresponds to a correctness-ensuring synchronization placement. We extract the global constraints from generalizations of counterexample traces and the control-flow graph of the program. The global constraints enable us to choose from among the encoded synchronization solutions using an objective function. We consider two types of objective functions: ones that are solely dependent on the program (e.g., minimizing the size of critical sections) and ones that are also dependent on the computing platform. For the latter, given a program and a computing platform, we construct a performance model based on measuring average contention for critical sections and the average time taken to acquire and release a lock under a given average contention. We empirically evaluated that our approach scales to typical module sizes of many real world concurrent programs such as device drivers and multithreaded servers, and that the performance predictions match reality. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive approach for optimizing the placement of synthesized synchronization.

We present the first study of robustness of systems that are both timed as well as reactive (I/O). We study the behavior of such timed I/O systems in the presence of "uncertain inputs" and formalize their robustness using the analytic notion of Lipschitz continuity. Thus, a timed I/O system is K-(Lipschitz) robust if the perturbation in its output is at most K times the perturbation in its input. We quantify input and output perturbation using "similarity functions" over timed words such as the timed version of the Manhattan distance and the Skorokhod distance. We consider two models of timed I/O systems --- timed transducers and asynchronous sequential circuits. While K-robustness is undecidable even for discrete transducers, we identify a class of timed transducers which admits a polynomial space decision procedure for K-robustness. For asynchronous sequential circuits, we reduce K-robustness w.r.t. timed Manhattan distances to K-robusness of discrete letter-to-letter transducers and show PSPACE-compeleteness of the problem.