Search

Your search keyword '"Ronald N. Wessel"' showing total 10 results
Start Over Author "Ronald N. Wessel" Language english
10 results on '"Ronald N. Wessel"'

1. Substantial Variation in Decision Making to Perform Subacromial Decompression Surgery for Subacromial Pain Syndrome Between Orthopaedic Shoulder Surgeons for Identical Clinical Scenarios: A Case-Vignette Study

Author

Timon H. Geurkink, M.D., Perla J. Marang-van de Mheen, Ph.D., Jochem Nagels, M.D., Ronald N. Wessel, M.D., Rudolf W. Poolman, M.D., Ph.D., Rob G.H.H. Nelissen, M.D., Ph.D., and Leti van Bodegom-Vos, M.D., Ph.D.

Subjects
Sports medicine, RC1200-1245
Abstract

Purpose: To provide further insight into the variation in decision making to perform subacromial decompression (SAD) surgery in patients with subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS) and its influencing factors. Methods: Between November 2021 and February 2022, we invited 202 Dutch Shoulder and Elbow Society members to participate in a cross-sectional Web-based survey including 4 clinical scenarios of SAPS patients. Scenarios varied in patient characteristics, clinical presentation, and other contextual factors. For each scenario, respondents were asked (1) to indicate whether they would perform SAD surgery, (2) to indicate the probability of benefit of SAD surgery (i.e., pain reduction), (3) to indicate the probability of harm (i.e., complications), and (4) to rank the 5 most important factors influencing their treatment decision. Results: A total of 78 respondents (39%) participated. The percentage of respondents who would perform SAD surgery ranged from 4% to 25% among scenarios. The median probability of perceived benefit ranged between 70% and 79% across scenarios for respondents indicating to perform surgery compared with 15% to 29% for those indicating not to perform surgery. The difference in the median probability of perceived harm ranged from 3% to 9% for those indicating to perform surgery compared with 8% to 13% for those indicating not to perform surgery. Surgeons who would perform surgery mainly reported patient-related factors (e.g., complaint duration and response to physical therapy) as the most important factors to perform SAD surgery, whereas surgeons who would not perform surgery mainly reported guideline-related factors. Conclusions: Overall, Dutch orthopaedic shoulder surgeons are reluctant to perform SAD surgery in SAPS patients. There is substantial variation among orthopaedic surgeons regarding decisions to perform SAD surgery for SAPS even when evaluating identical scenarios, where particularly the perceived benefit of surgery differed between those who would perform surgery and those who would not. Surgeons who would not perform SAD surgery mainly referred to guideline-related factors as influential factors for their decision, whereas those who would perform SAD surgery considered patient-related factors more important. Clinical Relevance: There is substantial variation in decision making to perform SAD surgery for SAPS between individual orthopaedic surgeons for identical case scenarios.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Investigation of the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-standardized autologous blood injection as treatment for lateral epicondylitis

Author

Christel Braaksma, Jill Otte, Ronald N. Wessel, and Nienke Wolterbeek

Subjects
tennis elbow, injection, conservative treatment, ultrasound, Orthopedic surgery, RD701-811
Abstract

Background There are various conservative treatment options for lateral epicondylitis (LE). The aim is to evaluate pain, daily functioning, and complications after ultrasound-standardized autologous blood injections in patients with LE. Methods For this prospective cohort study, consecutive patients (>18 years) diagnosed with LE were included. Autologous blood was injected using a medical device containing an injection disposable with 12 small needles (Instant Tennis Elbow Cure [ITEC]) device. Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE), subjective elbow score (SES), palpation and provocation pain, satisfaction, and complications of treatment were measured at baseline and two months after treatment. Paired t-tests and Fisher’s exact tests were used for calculating the difference between pre- and post-treatment outcomes. Results Fifty-five elbows were analyzed. Mean time between pre- and post-treatment was 11.1 weeks (standard deviation [SD], 8.9 weeks). The mean PRTEE score decreased from 68.2 (SD, 15.7) before surgery to 53.2 (SD, 25.9; p

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Ninety-day complication rate based on 532 Latarjet procedures in Dutch hospitals with different operation volumes

Author

Hassanin Alkaduhimi, Nienke W. Willigenburg, Ronald N. Wessel, Nienke Wolterbeek, Egbert J.D. Veen, Rinco C.T. Koorevaar, W. Jaap Willems, Eelco M. Nelissen, Heleen Sonneveld, Petra E. Flikweert, Jantsje H. Pasma, Cornelis P.J. Visser, Maartje E. Meier, Maaike P.J. van den Borne, Arien J. Dijkstra, Tim Kraal, Arthur van Noort, Tjarco D.W. Alta, Michał S. Gałek-Aldridge, Sebastiaan Floor, Michel P.J. van den Bekerom, Denise Eygendaal, Neuromechanics, AMS - Musculoskeletal Health, AMS - Sports, Graduate School, AMS - Amsterdam Movement Sciences, and Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine

Subjects
shoulder, complication, glenohumeral, Treatment Study, General Medicine, sequelae, Level IV, instability, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, Latarjet, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery, Case Series
Abstract

Background: In this study, we aimed to provide insight into the 90-day complication rates following the Latarjet procedure. Data from 2015 were collected from multiple hospitals in the Netherlands, with different volumes of Latarjet procedures. Our second aim was to examine which patient and surgical factors were associated with complications.Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 13 hospitals between 2015 and 2022. Data regarding complications within 90 days of Latarjet procedures were extracted. The effect of sex, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, previous shoulder operations, fixation material, hospital volume, screw size, and operation time on the complication rate was assessed by multivariable logistic regression analysis.Results: Of the 532 included patients, 58 (10.9%) had complications. The most common complications were material failure (n = 19, 3.6%) and nerve injury (n = 13, 2.4%). The risk of complications was lower for male patients than for female patients (odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.77; P = .006). Age, BMI, smoking, previous shoulder operations, type of fixation material, hospital volume, screw size, and operation time were not associated with complications.Conclusion: The 90-day complication rate after the Latarjet procedure was 10.9% and was higher in female patients than in male patients. Age, BMI, smoking, previous shoulder operations, type of fixation material, hospital volume, screw size, and operation time did not affect complication rates. We advise setting up a national registry to prevent under-reporting of complications.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. The Popeye sign:a doctor's and not a patient's problem

Author

Ronald N. Wessel, Michel P.J. van den Bekerom, Marieke F. van Wier, Derek F.P. van Deurzen, Frans L. Garssen, Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs, Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Otolaryngology / Head & Neck Surgery, APH - Quality of Care, AMS - Ageing & Vitality, and AMS - Sports

Subjects
Male, Shoulder, medicine.medical_specialty, Popeye, Diagnostic Study, Tenodesis, Popeye sign, Level III, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Forelimb, medicine, Animals, Humans, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, In patient, Muscle, Skeletal, long head of the biceps, 030222 orthopedics, reliability, business.industry, General surgery, Mean age, 030229 sport sciences, General Medicine, Middle Aged, Interobserver Agreement Design, Arm, Surgery, Female, business, Body mass index
Abstract

Background The Popeye sign is a frequently reported finding following long head of the biceps (LHB) surgery and may be more often detected by doctors than by patients. This study investigates agreement between patients and doctors regarding the presence of a Popeye sign following LHB surgery. Method This interobserver study investigates agreement between patients and consulting physicians with regard to assessment of a Popeye sign in patients following LHB surgery. Furthermore, this was compared with assessments by non–consulting physicians (observers) using digital photographs of the operated arm, taken both preoperatively and postoperatively. Data about gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) were collected to investigate their role in doctor’s reporting of a Popeye sign. Patient’s dissatisfaction with a Popeye sign in the operated arm was evaluated as well. Results Ninety-seven patients (mean age 61 ± 6.0 years, 62% male) underwent LHB surgery. A Popeye sign was reported by 2 patients (2%) as opposed to 32 cases (40%) by consulting physicians, of which only 1 case was in agreement. Krippendorff’s alpha (Kalpha) for agreement between observers for preoperative photographs was 0.074 (95% CI −0.277, 0.382) and 0.495 (95% CI 0.317, 0.659) for postoperative cases. Kalpha between observers and consulting physicians for pre- and postoperative cases were 0.033 (95% CI −970, 0.642) and 0.499 (95% CI 0.265, 0.699), respectively. Phi coefficient analysis showed a moderate, statistically significant correlation between male sex and Popeye sign identification. Rank-biserial calculation revealed negligible correlation between BMI and age with regard to detecting a Popeye sign by both consulting physicians and observers. Dissatisfaction about swelling in the upper arm was reported in 1 case, though in a location that did not correspond to the location of a Popeye sign. Conclusion The Popeye sign is more often identified by doctors than by patients after undergoing LHB surgery. BMI and age are not related to the detection of a Popeye sign, but sex is moderately correlated. Together with the low percentage of dissatisfaction of patients with this swelling, this signifies that a Popeye sign seems to be a doctor’s rather than a patient’s problem.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index for Elderly Patients with a Femoral Neck Fracture

Author

Paul T.P.W. Burgers, Rudolf W Poolman, Theodorus MJ Van Bakel, Wim E Tuinebreijer, Stephanie M Zielinski, Mohit Bhandari, Peter Patka, Esther MM Van Lieshout, P J Devereaux, Gordon H Guyatt, Thomas A Einhorn, Lehana Thabane, Emil H Schemitsch, Kenneth J Koval, Frede Frihagen, Kevin Tetsworth, Ernesto Guerra-Farfan, Stephen D Walter, Sheila Sprague, Marilyn Swinton, Taryn Scott, Paula McKay, Kim Madden, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Lisa Buckingham, Aravin Duraikannan, Heather Silva, Martin J Heetveld, Robert D Zura, Victoria Avram, Ajay Manjoo, Dale Williams, John Antoniou, Tim Ramsay, Earl R Bogoch, Andrew Trenholm, Stephen Lyman, Madhu Mazumdar, Kevin J Bozic, Mark Luborsky, Stuart Goodman, Susan Muray, Rob Korley, Richard Buckley, Paul Duffy, Shannon Puloski, Kimberly Carcary, Melissa Lorenzo, Michael D McKee, Jeremy A Hall, Aaron Nauth, Daniel Whelan, Timothy R Daniels, James P Waddell, Henry Ahn, Milena R Vicente, Jennifer T Hidy, Melanie T MacNevin, Hans Kreder, Terry Axelrod, Richard Jenkinson, Markku Nousiainen, David Stephen, Veronica Wadey, Monica Kunz, Katrine Milner, Ria Cagaanan, Melanie MacNevin, Peter J O’Brien, Piotr A Blachut, Henry M Broekhuyse, Pierre Guy, Kelly A Lefaivre, Gerard P Slobogean, Raman Johal, Irene Leung, Chad Coles, Ross Leighton, C. Glen Richardson, Michael Biddulph, Michael Gross, Michael Dunbar, J. David Amirault, David Alexander, Catherine Coady, Mark Glazebrook, David Johnston, William Oxner, Gerald Reardon, Ivan Wong, Kelly Trask, Shelley MacDonald, Andrew Furey, Craig Stone, Minnie Parsons, Trevor Stone, Mauri Zomar, Robert McCormack, Kelly Apostle, Dory Boyer, Farhad Moola, Bertrand Perey, Darius Viskontas, Karyn Moon, Raely Moon, Yves Laflamme, Benoit Benoit, Pierre Ranger, Michel Malo, Julio Fernandes, Karine Tardif, Julie Fournier, Pascal André Vendittoli, Vincent Massé, Alain G Roy, Martin Lavigne, Daniel Lusignan, Craig Davis, Philip Stull, Stewart Weinerman, Peter Weingarten, Steven Lindenbaum, Michael Hewitt, Rebecca Danielwicz, Janell Baker, Michael Mont, Donald E Delanois, Bhaveen Kapadia, Kimona Issa, Marylou Mullen, Andrew Sems, Barb Foreman, Javad Parvizi, Tiffany Morrison, Courtland Lewis, Stephanie Caminiti, Paul Tornetta, William R Creevy, Michelle J Lespasio, Hope Carlisle, Andrew Marcantonio, Michael Kain, Lawrence Specht, John Tilzey, John Garfi, Samir Mehta, John L Esterhai, Jaimo Ahn, Derek Donegan, Annamarie Horan, Kelly McGinnis, James Roberson, Thomas Bradbury, Greg Erens, Kyle Webb, Brian Mullis, Karl Shively, Andrew Parr, Janos Ertl, Ripley Worman, Mark Webster, Judd Cummings, Valda Frizzell, Molly Moore, Clifford B Jones, James R Ringler, Debra L Sietsema, Jane E Walker, Enes Kanlic, Amr Abdelgawad, Juan Shunia, Charles DePaolo, Susan Sutherland, Rachel Alosky, Robert Zura, Maria Manson, Gregg Strathy, Kathleen Peter, Paul Johnson, Meaghan Morton, James Shaer, Tyson Schrickel, Barbara Hileman, Marina Hanes, Elisha Chance, E. Matthew Heinrich, David Dodgin, Michele LaBadie, David Zamorano, Martin Tynan, Ran Schwarzkopf, John A Scolaro, Ranjan Gupta, Samuel Bederman, Nitin Bhatia, Bang Hoang, Douglas Kiester, Neil Jones, Gregory Rafijah, Damon Alavekios, Jason Lee, Akshay Mehta, Steven Schroder, Tom Chao, Vincent Colin, Phuc (Phil) Dang, Stephen Keun Heng, Gregory Lopez, Samuel Galle, Sohrab Pahlavan, Duy L Phan, Minal Tapadia, Christopher Bui, Nickul Jain, Tyler Moore, Nathan Moroski, Deeba Pourmand, Erik N Kubiak, Jeremy Gililland, David Rothberg, Christopher Peters, Christopher Pelt, Ami R Stuart, Kirby Corbey, Franklin D Shuler, James Day, Tigran Garabekyan, Felix Cheung, Ali Oliashirazi, Jonathon Salava, Linda Morgan, Timothy Wilson-Byrne, Mary Beth Cordle, Leon H.G.J. Elmans, Joost A.A.M. van den Hout, Adrianus JP Joosten, Ad FA van Beurden, Stefan BT Bolder, Denise Eygendaal, Adrianus F.C.M. Moonen, Rutger CI van Geenen, Eric A Hoebink, Robert Wagenmakers, Wouter van Helden, Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen, Herbert Roerdink, Joost M Reuver, Alexander FW Barnaart, Elvira R Flikweert, Rover Krips, J. Bernard Mullers, Hans Schüller, Mark LM Falke, Frans J Kurek, Adrianus CH Slingerland, Jan P van Dijk, Wouter H van Helden, Hugo W Bolhuis, Pieter HJ Bullens, Mike Hogervorst, Karin E de Kroon, Rob H Jansen, Ferry Steenstra, Eric EJ Raven, W. Peter J Fontijne, Saskia C Wiersma, Bastiaan Boetes, Edgar JT ten Holder, Huub JL van der Heide, Jochem Nagels, Enrike H.M.J. van der Linden-van der Zwaag, Stefan B Keizer, Jan-Willem A Swen, Peter HC den Hollander, Bregje JW Thomassen, Willem Jan Kleyn Molekamp, Frank R.A.J. de Meulemeester, Arthur EB Kleipool, Robert Haverlag, Maarten P Simons, Eduard L.A.R. Mutsaerts, Rob Kooijman, Roelf R Postema, René J.T.M. Bleker, Harald IH Lampe, Lein Schuman, John Cheung, Frank van Bommel, W. Paul Winia, Daniel Haverkamp, Harm van der Vis, Peter A Nolte, Michel PJ van den Bekerom, Tjitte de Jong, Arthur van Noort, Diederik A Vergroesen, Bernard G Schutte, Harm M van der Vis, Lijkele Beimers, Jasper de Vries, Arthur W Zurcher, G.H. Rob Albers, Maarten Rademakers, Stefan Breugem, Ibo van der Haven, Pieter Jan Damen, Gythe H Bulstra, Martin M Campo, Mathijs P Somford, Daniël Haverkamp, Susan Liew, Harvinder Bedi, Ashley Carr, Andrew Chia, Steve Csongvay, Craig Donohue, Stephen Doig, Elton Edwards, Max Esser, Richard Freeman, Andrew Gong, Doug Li, Russell Miller, Lu Ton, Otis Wang, Ian Young, Adam Dowrick, Zoe Murdoch, Claire Sage, Richard Page, David Bainbridge, Richard Angliss, Ben Miller, Andrew Thomson, Graeme Brown, Simon Williams, Kevin Eng, David Bowyer, John Skelley, Chatar Goyal, Sally Beattie, Enrique Guerado, Encarnacion Cruz, Juan Ramon Cano, Miguel Angel Froufe, Lluis Marull Serra, Samer Al-dirra, Cristina Martinez, Francisco José Tarazona Santabalbina, Jordi Teixidor Serra, Jordi Tomas Hernandez, Marc Aguilar Garcia, Vicente Molero Garcia, Sergi Barrera, Miriam Garrido, Lars Nordsletten, John Clarke-Jenssen, Geir Hjorthaug, Anne Christine Brekke, Elise Berg Vesterhus, Ingunn Skaugrud, Pradeep Tripathi, Sandesh Katiyar, Preksha Shukla, Marc Swiontkowski, Gordon Guyatt, Kyle Jeray, Stephen Walter, Helena Viveiros, Victoria Truong, Kaitlin Koo, Qi Zhou, Deborah Maddock, Nicole Simunovic, Julie Agel, Amar Rangan, Birgit C Hanusch, Lucksy Kottam, Rachel Clarkson, Gregory J Della Rocca, Gerard Slobogean, Jeffrey Katz, Brenda Gillespie, Gail A Greendale, Curtis Hartman, Craig Rubin, James Waddell, H. Michael Lemke, Amber Oatt, Richard E Buckley, Robert Korley, Kelly Johnston, James Powell, David Sanders, Abdel Lawendy, Christina Tieszer, John Murnaghan, Diane Nam, Albert Yee, Daniel B Whelan, Lisa M Wild, Ryan M Khan, Cathy Coady, David Amirault, Glen Richardson, Gwen Dobbin, Ryan Bicknell, Jeff Yach, Davide Bardana, Gavin Wood, Mark Harrison, David Yen, Sue Lambert, Fiona Howells, Angela Ward, Paul Zalzal, Heather Brien, V Naumetz, Brad Weening, Eugene K Wai, Steve Papp, Wade T Gofton, Stephen P Kingwell, Garth Johnson, Joseph O’Neil, Darren M Roffey, Vivian Borsella, Todd M Oliver, Vicki Jones, Terrence J Endres, Samuel G Agnew, Kyle J Jeray, J. Scott Broderick, David R Goetz, Thomas B Pace, Thomas M Schaller, Scott E Porter, Stephanie L Tanner, Rebecca G Snider, Lauren A Nastoff, Shea A Bielby, Julie A Switzer, Peter A Cole, Sarah A Anderson, Paul M Lafferty, Mengnai Li, Thuan V Ly, Scott B Marston, Amy L Foley, Sandy Vang, David M Wright, Andrew J Marcantonio, Michael SH Kain, Richard Iorio, Lawrence M Specht, John F Tilzey, Margaret J Lobo, John S Garfi, Heather A Vallier, Andrea Dolenc, Chalitha Robinson, Michael J Prayson, Richard Laughlin, L. Joseph Rubino, Jedediah May, Geoffrey Ryan Rieser, Liz Dulaney-Cripe, Chris Gayton, John T Gorczyca, Jonathan M Gross, Catherine A Humphrey, Stephen Kates, Krista Noble, Allison W McIntyre, Kaili Pecorella, Craig A Davis, Stephen Lindenbaum, John Schwappach, Janell K Baker, Tori Rutherford, Heike Newman, Shane Lieberman, Erin Finn, Kristin Robbins, Meghan Hurley, Lindsey Lyle, Khalis Mitchell, Kieran Browner, Erica Whatley, Krystal Payton, Christina Reeves, Lisa K Cannada, David Karges, Leslie Hill, John Esterhai, Annamarie D Horan, Christine A Kaminski, Brynn N Kowalski, Jonathan P Keeve, Christopher G Anderson, Michael D McDonald, Jodi M Hoffman, Ivan Tarkin, Peter Siska, Gary Gruen, Andrew Evans, Dana J Farrell, James Irrgang, Arlene Luther, William W Cross, Joseph R Cass, Stephen A Sems, Michael E Torchia, Tyson Scrabeck, Mark Jenkins, Jules Dumais, Amanda W Romero, Carlos A Sagebien, Mark S Butler, James T Monica, Patricia Seuffert, Joseph R Hsu, James Ficke, Michael Charlton, Matthew Napierala, Mary Fan, Chadi Tannoury, Michael Archdeacon, Ryan Finnan, Toan Le, John Wyrick, Shelley Hess, Michael L Brennan, Robert Probe, Evelyn Kile, Kelli Mills, Lydia Clipper, Michelle Yu, Katie Erwin, Daniel Horwitz, Kent Strohecker, Teresa K Swenson, Andrew H Schmidt, Jerald R Westberg, Kamran Aurang, Gary Zohman, Brett Peterson, Roger B Huff, Joseph Baele, Timothy Weber, Matt Edison, Jessica McBeth, Janos P Ertl, J. Andrew Parr, Molly M Moore, Erin Tobias, Emily Thomas, Charles J DePaolo, Leslie E Shell, Lynne Hampton, Stephanie Shepard, Tracy Nanney, Claudine Cuento, Robert V Cantu, Eric R Henderson, Linda S Eickhoff, E. Mark Hammerberg, Philip Stahel, David Hak, Cyril Mauffrey, Douglas Gibula, Hannah Gissel, Corey Henderson, David P Zamorano, Martin C Tynan, Deanna Lawson, Brett D Crist, Yvonne M Murtha, Linda K Anderson, Colleen Linehan, Lindsey Pilling, Courtland G Lewis, Raymond J Sullivan, Elizabeth Roper, William Obremskey, Philip Kregor, Justin E Richards, Kenya Stringfellow, Michael P Dohm, Abby Zellar, Michiel JM Segers, Jacco AC Zijl, Bart Verhoeven, Anke B Smits, Jean Paul PM de Vries, Bram Fioole, Henk van der Hoeven, Evert BM Theunissen, Tammo S de Vries Reilingh, Lonneke Govaert, Philippe Wittich, Maurits de Brauw, Jan Wille, Peter M.N.Y.M. Go, Ewan D Ritchie, Ronald N Wessel, Eric R Hammacher, Gijs A Visser, Heyn Stockmann, Rob Silvis, Jaap P Snellen, Bram Rijbroek, Joris JG Scheepers, Erik GJ Vermeulen, Michiel PC Siroen, Ronald Vuylsteke, Hans LF Brom, Herman Rijna, Piet AR de Rijcke, Cees L Koppert, Steven E Buijk, Richard PR Groenendijk, Imro Dawson, Geert WM Tetteroo, Milko MM Bruijninckx, Pascal G Doornebosch, Eelco JR de Graaf, Maarten van der Elst, Carmen C van der Pol, Martijne van’t Riet, Tom M Karsten, Mark R de Vries, Laurents PS Stassen, Niels WL Schep, G Ben Schmidt, W H Hoffman, Frank H.W.M. van der Heijden, W. Jaap Willems, Cor P van der Hart, Kahn Turckan, Sebastiaan Festen, Frank de Nies, Nico JM Out, Jan Bosma, Albert van Kampen, Jan Biert, Arie B van Vugt, Michael JR Edwards, Taco J Blokhuis, Jan Paul M Frölke, Leo MG Geeraedts, Jean WM Gardeniers, Edward T.C.H. Tan, Lodewijk M.S.J. Poelhekke, Maarten C de Waal Malefijt, Bart Schreurs, Gert R Roukema, Hong A Josaputra, Paul Keller, Peter D de Rooij, Hans Kuiken, Han Boxma, Berry I Cleffken, Ronald Liem, Steven J Rhemrev, Coks HR Bosman, Alexander de Mol van Otterloo, Jochem Hoogendoorn, Alexander C de Vries, Sven AG Meylaerts, Michiel HJ Verhofstad, Joost Meijer, Teun van Egmond, Igor van der Brand, Martin G Eversdijk, Rolf Peters, Dennis Den Hartog, Oscar JF Van Waes, Pim Oprel, Martin Campo, Ronald Verhagen, G.H. Robert Albers, Rogier KJ Simmermacher, Jeroen van Mulken, Karlijn van Wessem, Steven M van Gaalen, Luke PH Leenen, Maarten W.G.A. Bronkhorst, Onno R Guicherit, J. Carel Goslings, Kees Jan Ponsen, Mahesh Bhatia, Vinod Arora, Vivek Tyagi, Ajay Gupta, Neeraj Jain, Farah Khan, Ateet Sharma, Amir Sanghavi, Mittal Trivedi, Anil Rai, null Subash, Kamal Rai, Vineet Yadav, Sanjay Singh, Amal Shankar Prasad, Vimlesh Mishra, D C Sundaresh, Angshuman Khanna, Joe Joseph Cherian, Davy J Olakkengil, Gaurav Sharma, Akhil Dadi, Naveen Palla, Utsav Ganguly, B. Sachidananda Rai, Janakiraman Rajakumar, Peter Hull, Sophie Lewis, Simone Evans, Rajesh Nanda, Rajanikanth Logishetty, Sanjeev Anand, Carol Bowler, Andrew Jennings, Graham Chuter, Glynis Rose, Gillian Horner, Callum Clark, Kate Eke, Mike Reed, Chris Herriott, Christine Dobb, Hamish Curry, Greg Etherington, Arvind Jain, Ash Moaveni, Matthias Russ, Geoff Donald, Patrick Weinrauch, Paul Pincus, Steven Yang, Brett Halliday, Trevor Gervais, Michael Holt, Annette Flynn, Marinis Pirpiris, David Love, Andrew Bucknill, Richard J Farrugia, Torben Ianssen, Asgeir Amundsen, Jan Egil Brattgjerd, Tor Borch, Berthe Bøe, Bernhard Flatøy, Sondre Hasselund, Knut Jørgen Haug, Kim Hemlock, Tor Magne Hoseth, Geir Jomaas, Thomas Kibsgård, Tarjei Lona, Gilbert Moatshe, Oliver Müller, Marius Molund, Tor Nicolaisen, Fredrik Nilsen, Jonas Rydinge, Morten Smedsrud, Are Stødle, Axel Trommer, Stein Ugland, Anders Karlsten, Guri Ekås, Hans-Christoph Pape, Matthias Knobe, Roman Pfeifer, Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Graduate School, Other departments, Surgery, Other Research, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Cardiothoracic Surgery, and Emergency Medicine

Subjects
Male, medicine.medical_specialty, WOMAC, Abstracting and Indexing, Osteoarthritis, Cronbach's alpha, Surveys and Questionnaires, medicine, Humans, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Clinical significance, Femoral neck, Aged, 80 and over, Ontario, business.industry, Reproducibility of Results, Construct validity, General Medicine, medicine.disease, RELIABILITY VALIDITY, Femoral Neck Fractures, Reconstructive and regenerative medicine Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 10], Clinical trial, Reconstructive and regenerative medicine Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [Radboudumc 10], medicine.anatomical_structure, Physical therapy, Female, Surgery, business
Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext BACKGROUND: The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) has been extensively evaluated in groups of patients with osteoarthritis, yet not in patients with a femoral neck fracture. This study aimed to determine the reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the WOMAC compared with the Short Form-12 (SF-12) and the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) questionnaires for the assessment of elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture. METHODS: Reliability was tested by assessing the Cronbach alpha. Construct validity was determined with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Change scores were calculated from ten weeks to twelve months of follow-up. Standardized response means and floor and ceiling effects were determined. Analyses were performed to compare the results for patients less than eighty years old with those for patients eighty years of age or older. RESULTS: The mean WOMAC total score was 89 points before the fracture in the younger patients and increased from 70 points at ten weeks to 81 points at two years postoperatively. In the older age group, these scores were 86, 75, and 78 points. The mean WOMAC pain scores before the fracture and at ten weeks and two years postoperatively were 92, 76, and 87 points, respectively, in the younger age group and 92, 84, and 93 points in the older age group. Function scores were 89, 68, and 79 points for the younger age group and 84, 71, and 73 points for the older age group. The Cronbach alpha for pain, stiffness, function, and the total scale ranged from 0.83 to 0.98 for the younger age group and from 0.79 to 0.97 for the older age group. Construct validity was good, with 82% and 79% of predefined hypotheses confirmed in the younger and older age groups, respectively. Responsiveness was moderate. No floor effects were found. Moderate to large ceiling effects were found for pain and stiffness scales at ten weeks and twelve months in younger patients (18% to 36%) and in the older age group (38% to 53%). CONCLUSIONS: The WOMAC showed good reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness in both age groups of elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture who had been physically and mentally fit before the fracture. The instrument is suitable for use in future clinical studies in these populations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results are based on two clinical trials. The questionnaires used concern pure, clinically relevant issues (ability to walk, climb stairs, etc.). Moreover, the results can be used for future research comparing clinical outcomes (or treatments) for populations with a femoral neck fracture.

Published
2015

6. Prognostic factors for recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A prognostic study

Author

Jean-Pierre Baeyens, Ronald N. Wessel, Rob A. de Bie, Anouk J.M. Fermont, Nienke Wolterbeek, Movement and Nutrition for Health and Performance, Movement and Sport Sciences, Biomechanics, Epidemiologie, RS: CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, and RS: CAPHRI - R3 - Functioning, Participating and Rehabilitation

Subjects
Adult, Male, Prognostic factor, medicine.medical_specialty, Rotator Cuff Injuries, Arthroscopy, Rotator Cuff, Quality of life, medicine, Humans, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Rotator cuff, Prospective Studies, Range of Motion, Articular, Prospective cohort study, Aged, Rupture, Shoulder Joint, business.industry, Shoulder, arthroscopic repair, prognostic factors, quality of life, rotator cuff lesion, Recovery of Function, General Medicine, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Functional recovery, Tendon, Surgery, Treatment Outcome, medicine.anatomical_structure, Cuff, Quality of Life, Female, Shoulder Injuries, business, Range of motion, Follow-Up Studies
Abstract

Background Studies concerning prognostic factors of recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair mostly focus on tendon integrity or functional recovery as an outcome. Little is known about how they influence quality of life after surgery. We therefore tried to identify prognostic factors having an impact on quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods This study included 30 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. We assessed Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index as primary outcome and RAND-36, Constant-Murley score, and a shoulder hindrance score as secondary outcomes. Patients were repeatedly measured: once preoperatively and 4 times postoperatively. Preoperative range of motion, obesity, fatty infiltration, and cuff retraction were preselected as prognostic factors. Results Patients were significantly improved at 3 months and 6 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. In multiple regression analysis, none of the preselected factors could be identified as a prognostic factor influencing quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (measured with the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index). For the outcome variables RAND-36 (6 months, 1 year) and shoulder hindrance score (1 year), fatty infiltration Goutallier stages 1 and 2 and retraction grades II, III, and IV were significant predictors. Conclusion Although fatty infiltration and retraction grade predict the RAND-36 and shoulder hindrance score, this study could not support preoperative range of motion, obesity, fatty infiltration, or retraction of the cuff as a prognostic factor for quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. This study shows that if selection of patients is done properly, these factors do not influence a successful outcome.

Published
2015
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. The conceptually equivalent Dutch version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC)(c)

Author

Ronald N. Wessel, Nienke Wolterbeek, Anouk J.M. Fermont, Rob A. de Bie, Sharon Griffin, Heleen Sonneveld, Henk van Mameren, RS: CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, and Epidemiologie

Subjects
Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Intraclass correlation, Population, Severity of Illness Index, Rotator Cuff, Rheumatology, Cronbach's alpha, Validation, Medicine, Humans, Quality of life questionnaires, Rotator cuff repair, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Rotator cuff, Prospective Studies, education, Reliability (statistics), Aged, Netherlands, Aged, 80 and over, education.field_of_study, Arm Injuries, business.industry, WORC, Middle Aged, Confidence interval, Standard error, medicine.anatomical_structure, Physical therapy, Translation process, Constant score, Female, business, Research Article
Abstract

The WORC is a quality of life questionnaire designed for patients with disorders of the rotator cuff, originally developed in English. The purpose of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the WORC for use in the Dutch population and to evaluate reliability, agreement and floor and ceiling effects of this Dutch version in a population of patients with rotator cuff disease. Reliability was tested by measuring the Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for test-retest reliability. Agreement was measured using the Standard Error of Measurement (SEMagreement); and the smallest detectable change (SDC) was calculated based on the SEM. Pearson Correlations Coefficients were used to comparing the WORC with the RAND-36, the Constant Score and 11-point shoulder hindrance scale. Fifty-seven patients entered into this study of whom 50 were available for test-retest validation. The internal consistency of the Dutch WORC tested by Cronbach’s alpha was 0.95 for the total questionnaire. The ICC for the WORC is 0.91 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.85-0.95. Standard Error of Measurement was 6.0 points with a Smallest Detectable Change of 16.7 points on a 0-100 scale. Pearson Correlations Coefficients showed a significant positive correlation between the Dutch WORC and Constant Score (r = 0.60) and a strong reversed correlation with the shoulder hindrance scale (r = -0.75). The Dutch WORC seems to be a reliable health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with rotator cuff disorders. NCT01532492 .

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. Validation of the western ontario rotator cuff index in patients with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A study protocol

Author

Tjoan E Lim, Ronald N. Wessel, Rob A. de Bie, Henk van Mameren, RS: CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, and Epidemiologie

Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty, lcsh:Diseases of the musculoskeletal system, Sports medicine, medicine.medical_treatment, Severity of Illness Index, Rotator Cuff Injuries, Arthroscopy, Disability Evaluation, Rotator Cuff, Study Protocol, Postoperative Complications, Rheumatology, Quality of life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, medicine, Humans, Rotator cuff, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Prospective Studies, Prospective cohort study, Protocol (science), Rehabilitation, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Surgery, medicine.anatomical_structure, Orthopedic surgery, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Physical therapy, lcsh:RC925-935, business
Abstract

Background Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is described as being a successful procedure. These results are often derived from clinical general shoulder examinations, which are then classified as 'excellent', 'good', 'fair' or 'poor'. However, the cut-off points for these classifications vary and sometimes modified scores are used. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed to improve quality of life. Therefore, disease specific health-related quality of life patient-administered questionnaires are needed. The WORC is a quality of life questionnaire designed for patients with disorders of the rotator cuff. The score is validated for rotator cuff disease, but not for rotator cuff repair specifically. The aim of this study is to investigate reliability, validity and responsiveness of WORC in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods/Design An approved translation of the WORC into Dutch is used. In this prospective study three groups of patients are used: 1. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; 2. Disorders of the rotator cuff without rupture; 3. Shoulder instability. The WORC, SF-36 and the Constant Score are obtained twice before therapy is started to measure reliability and validity. Responsiveness is tested by obtaining the same tests after therapy.

Published
2011
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. Outcome of total claviculectomy in six cases

Author

Ronald N. Wessel, Gerard R. Schaap, Other Research, and Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine

Subjects
Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Adolescent, Radiography, Bone Neoplasms, Malignancy, Risk Assessment, Cohort Studies, Fractures, Bone, Biopsy, medicine, Humans, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Child, Total claviculectomy, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Biopsy, Needle, Osteomyelitis, General Medicine, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Clavicle, Surgery, Osteotomy, medicine.anatomical_structure, Treatment Outcome, Acromioclavicular Joint, Female, Osteitis, business, Range of motion, Cohort study, Follow-Up Studies
Abstract

Total claviculectomy is a rare surgical procedure that has been performed for more than 90 years for a variety of indications, such as malignancy, trauma, and infection. What are the results for the pain score, and what is the influence of a total claviculectomy on the range of motion of the shoulder? We could not find the answers in the literature and analyzed 6 cases of total claviculectomy. The pain scores are good in a chronic osteitis case and in the two malignancy cases. In the 3 posttraumatic cases, the indication was pain, and all 3 had poor results because of persistent pain. All 6 patients had full range of motion. A resection of the entire clavicle did not disturb the motion of the shoulder. A tendency but no final conclusions can be drawn because of too few patients and heterogeneous indications.

Published
2007

10. Oblique radiograph for the detection of bone spurs in anterior ankle impingement

Author

Mario Maas, Niek C. van Dijk, Johannes L. Tol, Ronald N. Wessel, Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine

Subjects
Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Radiography, Oblique projection, Osteoarthritis, Talus, Cadaver, Humans, Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Exostoses, Observer Variation, Tibia, medicine.diagnostic_test, business.industry, Arthroscopy, Anatomy, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Biomechanical Phenomena, medicine.anatomical_structure, Orthopedic surgery, Bone spurs, Female, Ankle, medicine.symptom, business, Ankle Joint
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a radiographic view to detect anteromedial talotibial osteophytes that remain undetected on standard radiographs. Design and patients: In 10 cadaver specimens the maximal size was measured of anteromedial tibial osteophytes that remain undetected on a standard lateral radiograph projection, due to the presence of the anteromedial fibial rim. The average projection of the most prominent anterolateral tibial rim over the anteromedial rim was found to be 7.3 mm. A 7 mm barium-clay osteophyte was attached to this anteromedial rim of the distal tibia. Anteromedial osteophytes become most prominent on an oblique view, in which the radiographic beam is tilted into a 45degrees craniocaudal direction with the leg in 30degrees external rotation. This oblique view was compared with the findings of arthroscopic surgery in 25 consecutive patients with anterior ankle impingement syndrome. Results: Medially located tibial and talar osteophytes remained undetected on a standard lateral projection and became visible on the oblique anteromedial impingement (AMI) radiograph. Anterolateral tibial and talar osteophytes were well detected on a standard lateral radiograph projection but were invisible on the AMI view. There was a high correlation between the location of the osteophyte and the location of symptoms and the findings at arthroscopy. Conclusion: A combination of lateral and oblique radiographs can be used to differentiate between anteromedial and anterolateral bony ankle impingement

Published
2002

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results