Search

This article provides a conceptual framework for training in professional psychology focused on the construct of competency. The authors present a 3-dimensional competency model delineating the domains of knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values that serve as the foundation required of all psychologists, the domains of functional competencies that broadly define what psychologists do, and the stages of professional development from doctoral education to lifelong learning through continuing education. The goal in presenting this model is to provide a conceptual frame of reference for those responsible for psychology education, credentialing, and regulation. Keywords: education, competencies, training

This article considers the development of a global training curriculum and qualification in professional psychology, with particular emphasis on the Combined-Integrated (C-I) model. The C-I model exposes professional psychology trainees to two or more of the practice areas (i.e., clinical, counseling, school/educational). The authors argue that the C-I approach is one that is well suited to the development of a global training curriculum due to its emphasis on broadly training psychologists as well as its respect for diversity and integration of various theoretical and professional orientations. A survey of training programs in 16 countries/regions on six continents found significant variation in training, minimal qualifications. and roles of the professional psychologist. The authors recommend that an international group of psychologists develop a regionally flexible, but common, training curriculum and qualification that would include a five-to six year competency-based qualification. Ways in which the C-I training model may serve to integrate and globalize professional psychology are discussed. Keywords: international psychology; training and development; Combined-Integrated model of training in professional psychology

The article presents the 2006 report of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) to the International Council for Science. It lists the countries with National Membership in IUPsyS and the thirteen organizations that are affiliated with IUPsyS. It also provides information about the finances of the Union and the issues addressed at its Assembly and Executive Committee meetings. Details about the activities undertaken by IUPSyS during 2006 is also provided.

The article presents an annual report of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) submitted to the International Council for Science(ICSU). The countries with national membership in IUPsyS and the affiliated organizations are presented. An overview on the assembly and executive committee meetings, the secretariat and activities undertaken during 2005 are discussed. The capacity-building being the priority and the union contributing to international development is discussed.

Discusses highlights of the annual report of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) to the International Council for Science (ICSU), for the period January to December 2004. History of the IUPsyS; Member countries; Organizational affiliations.

The International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) is a non-profit, international non-government organization. Its legal venue is located in Montreal, Canada where it is incorporated. The Statutes and Rules of Procedure set out the organization's objectives as well as the structure and process by which it operates. For those not already familiar with the IUPsyS, it is important to note that the fundamental entity of the Union is the "National Member". Similar to many other international scientific unions, IUPsyS does not have individual members. National Members, one per country, are recognized and admitted according to the criteria and procedures found in the Statutes and Rules. Provision is also made for Affiliates, which are also, organized entities. Questions about the Statutes and Rules should be addressed to the Secretary-General, Pierre L.-J. Ritchie, Secretary-General, E-mail: pritchie@uottawa.ca [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reports on developments within the International Union of Psychological Science for the year 2003. Background of the union; Issues dealt during the union conventions; Features of the publications handled by the organization.

Presents the annual report of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPS) covering the period of January to December 2002. Background information on IUPS; Membership; Vital statistics; Organizational matters; Finances; Activities undertaken during 2002.

Details the revisions to the rules of procedure of the International Union of Psychological Science. Procedure for tie votes; Nomination of officials.

Presents the annual report of the International Union of Psychological Science covering the period January to December 2001. Membership; Vital Statistics; Organizational matters.

Presents the annual report of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) for the period covering January to December 2000. List of countries with national membership in IUPsyS; Assembly and executive committee meetings; Scientific meetings; Publications; Special projects; Reports on use of grants from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Research activities of the International Union of Psychological Science are reviewed from the perspective of their broader contribution to world development. Characterized by diversity, they are also engendered by the Union's collaboration with major international organizations. Several recent projects are elaborated. The challenges of facilitating research and research networks on a global scale are also noted. Les activités de recherche de l'Union internationale de psychologie scientifique sont analysées suivant la perspective de leur contribution effective au développement mondial. Caractérisées par leur diversité, ces études découlent d'une collaboration de l'Union avec d'importantes organisations internationales. Plusieurs des projets récents sont élaborés. Les défis associés à la facilitation des efforts de recherche et de création de réseaux efficaces à l'échelle planétaire sont également soulignés. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents information on the annual report of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS). This report covers the period January to December 1999. The International Union of Psychological Science is an organization composed of National Member organizations (national societies/associations/committees of scientific psychology, national academics of science, or similar organizations), comprising not more than one National Member per country. The report gives a list of member-countries and some vital statistics. Some of the members include Albania; Canada; Denmark; etc.

Presents the annual report of the International Union of Psychological Science for 1998. Membership; Vital statistics; Organizational matters; Activities undertaken during the year.

Deals with 1997 report of the International Union of Psychological Science. Countries with national membership; Number of affiliated organizations; Activities undertaken during 1997; Scientific meetings; Special projects.

Presents the annual report of the International Union of Psychological Science for 1996. Membership; Results of assembly and executive meetings; Activities taken in 1966.

Among the factors which may be useful to an assessment of unity/diversity, several are germane to the historic and contemporary evolution of psychology in Canada. Culture-based variables, economic and political factors, and the emergence of clearly scientific and professional streams are all pertinent to Canadian psychology. Within this context, Rosenzweig's (this issue) conceptualization of internal/external unifying/diversifying forces facilitates a better understanding of the realities which confront Canadian psychologists. By adopting a collaborative, collegially oriented approach with diverse groups spawning the full spectrum of psychological science and practice, the groundwork has been laid for a confederal system of functionally based cooperation which may be sufficient to maintain cohesion within the Canadian context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past few years, a network of regional coordinators has promoted a variety of community psychology activities in the United States and other countries, creating a base of social support for community psychologists in academic and field settings. This paper describes key organizing principles for creating viable support networks such as this one and presents specific examples of their use by the regional coordinators. The grassroots efforts of regional coordinators in stimulating social support, educational opportunities, resource exchanges, and a variety of other activities represent one of the more crucial and important functions undertaken by community psychologists and their organizations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Features the International Union of Psychological Science rules of procedures as revised and adopted by the Assembly in 1998. Organization of international congresses; Subscriptions; Nominations and elections; Order of assembly; Standing committees.

Objective: To explore factors affecting collaboration between family physicians and psychologists.Design: Mailed French-language survey.Setting: Eastern Ontario.Participants: Family physicians practising in the area of the Réseau des services de santé en français de l'Est de l'Ontario.Main Outcome Measures: Physicians' knowledge and understanding of the qualifications of psychologists and the regulations governing their profession; beliefs regarding the effectiveness of psychological treatments; views on the integration of psychologists into primary care; and factors affecting referrals to psychologists.Results: Of 457 surveys sent, 118 were returned and analyzed (27% of surveys delivered). Most family physicians were well aware that there were evidence-based psychological interventions for mental health and personal difficulties, and some knew that psychological interventions could help with physical conditions. Physicians had some knowledge about the qualifications and training of psychologists. Many physicians reported being uncomfortable providing counseling themselves owing to time constraints, the perception that they were inadequately trained for such work, and personal preferences. The largest barrier to referring patients to psychologists was cost, since services were not covered by public health insurance. Some physicians were deterred from referring by previous experience of not receiving feedback on patients from psychologists. Increased access to clinical psychologists through collaborative care was considered a desirable goal for primary health care.Conclusions: Family physicians know that there are evidence-based psychological interventions for mental health issues. Psychologists need to communicate better about their credentials and what they can offer, and share their professional opinions and recommendations on referred patients. Physicians would welcome practice-based psychological services and integrated interdisciplinary collaboration as recommended by the Kirby and Romanow commissions, but such collaboration is hampered by the lack of public health insurance coverage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]