Search

Key points A key feature of the receptive field of neurons in the visual system is their centre–surround antagonism, whereby the centre and the surround exhibit responses of opposite polarity. This organization is thought to enhance visual acuity, but whether and how such antagonism plays a role in more complex processing remains poorly understood. Here, we investigate the role of centre and surround receptive fields in retinal direction selectivity by exposing posterior‐preferring On–Off direction‐selective ganglion cells (pDSGCs) to adaptive light and recording their response to globally moving objects. We reveal that light adaptation leads to surround expansion in pDSGCs. The pDSGCs maintain their original directional tuning in the centre receptive field, but present the oppositely tuned response in their surround. Notably, although inhibition is the main substrate for retinal direction selectivity, we found that following light adaptation, both the centre‐ and surround‐mediated responses originate from directionally tuned excitatory inputs. Multi‐electrode array recordings show similar oppositely tuned responses in other DSGC subtypes. Together, these data attribute a new role for excitation in the direction‐selective circuit. This excitation carries an antagonistic centre–surround property, possibly designed to sharpen the detection of motion direction in the retina. Receptive fields of direction‐selective retinal ganglion cells expand asymmetrically following light adaptation. The increase in the surround receptive field generates a delayed spiking phase that is tuned to the null direction and is mediated by excitation. Following light adaptation, excitation rules the computation in the centre receptive field and is tuned to the preferred direction. GABAergic and glycinergic inputs modulate the null‐tuned delayed response differentially. Null‐tuned delayed spiking phases can be detected in all types of direction‐selective retinal ganglion cells. Light adaptation exposes a hidden directional excitation in the circuit, which is tuned to opposite directions in the centre and surround receptive fields. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mammalian retina is considered an autonomous circuit, yet work dating back to Ramon y Cajal indicates that it receives inputs from the brain. How such inputs affect retinal processing has remained unknown. We confirmed brain-to-retina projections of histaminergic neurons from the mouse hypothalamus. Histamine application ex vivo altered the activity of various retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), including direction-selective RGCs that gained responses to high motion velocities. These results were reproduced in vivo with optic tract recordings where histaminergic retinopetal axons were activated chemogenetically. Such changes could improve vision of fast-moving objects (e.g., while running), which fits with the known increased activity of histaminergic neurons during arousal. An antihistamine drug reduced optomotor responses to high-speed moving stimuli in freely moving mice. In humans, the same antihistamine nonuniformly modulated visual sensitivity across the visual field, indicating an evolutionary conserved function of the histaminergic system. Our findings expose a previously unappreciated role for brain-to-retina projections in modulating retinal function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dopamine has long been reported to enhance antagonistic surrounds of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). Yet, the retina contains many different RGC subtypes and the effects of dopamine can be subtype‐specific. Using multielectrode array (MEA) recordings we investigated how dopamine shapes the receptive fields of RGCs in the mouse retina. We found that the non‐selective dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine can either increase or decrease RGCs' surround strength, depending on their subtype. We then used two‐photon targeted patch‐clamp to target a specific RGC subtype, the transient‐Off‐αRGC. In line with our MEA recordings, apomorphine did not increase the antagonistic surround of transient‐Off‐αRGCs but enhanced their responses to Off stimuli in the centre receptive field. Both D1‐ and D2‐like family receptor (D1‐R and D2‐R) blockers had the opposite effect and reduced centre‐mediated responses, but differently affected transient‐Off‐αRGC's surround. While D2‐R blocker reduced surround antagonism, D1‐R blocker led to surround activation, revealing On responses to large stimuli. Using voltage‐clamp recordings we separated excitatory inputs from Off cone bipolar cells and inhibitory inputs from the primary rod pathway. In control conditions, cone inputs displayed strong surround antagonism, while inputs from the primary rod pathway showed no surround. Yet, the surround activation in the D1‐R blockade originated from the primary rod pathway. Our findings demonstrate that dopamine differentially affects RGC subtypes via distinct pathways, suggesting that dopamine has a more complex role in shaping the retinal code than previously reported. Key points: Receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) have a centre–surround organisation, and previous work has shown that this organisation can be modulated by dopamine in a light‐intensity‐dependent manner.Dopamine is thought to enhance RGCs' antagonistic surround, but a detailed understanding of how different RGC subtypes are affected is missing.Using a multielectrode array recordings, clustering analysis and pharmacological manipulations, we found that dopamine can either enhance or weaken antagonistic surrounds, and also change response kinetics, of RGCs in a subtype‐specific manner.We performed targeted patch‐clamp recordings of one RGC subtype, the transient‐Off‐αRGC, and identified the underlying circuits by which dopamine shapes its receptive field.Our findings demonstrate that dopamine acts in a subtype‐specific manner and can have complex effects, which has implications for other retinal computations that rely on receptive field structure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Retinal neurodegeneration can impair visual perception at different levels, involving not only photoreceptors, which are the most metabolically active cells, but also the inner retina. Compensatory mechanisms may hide the first signs of these impairments and reduce the likelihood of receiving timely treatments. Therefore, it is essential to characterize the early critical steps in the neurodegenerative progression to design adequate therapies. This paper describes and correlates early morphological and biochemical changes in the degenerating retina with in vivo functional analysis of retinal activity and investigates the progression of neurodegenerative stages for up to 7 months. For these purposes, Sprague–Dawley rats were exposed to 1000 lux light either for different durations (12 h to 24 h) and examined seven days afterward (7d) or for a fixed duration (24 h) and monitored at various time points following the exposure (up to 210d). Flash electroretinogram (fERG) recordings were correlated with morphological and histological analyses to evaluate outer and inner retinal disruptions, gliosis, trophic factor release, and microglial activation. Twelve hours or fifteen hours of exposure to constant light led to a severe retinal dysfunction with only minor morphological changes. Therefore, early pathological signs might be hidden by compensatory mechanisms that silence retinal dysfunction, accounting for the discrepancy between photoreceptor loss and retinal functional output. The long-term analysis showed a transient functional recovery, maximum at 45 days, despite a progressive loss of photoreceptors and coincident increases in glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and basic fibroblast growth factor-2 (bFGF-2) expression. Interestingly, the progression of the disease presented different patterns in the dorsal and ventral retina. The information acquired gives us the potential to develop a specific diagnostic tool to monitor the disease's progression and treatment efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes of visual loss in western countries, it has no cure, and its incidence will grow in the future, for the overall population aging. Albino rats with retinal degeneration induced by exposure to high-intensity light (light-damage, LD) have been extensively used as a model of AMD to test neuroprotective agents. Among them, trophic factors (NGF and BDNF) have been shown to play a significant role in photoreceptors' survival. Interestingly, cord blood serum (CBS) is an extract full of chemokines and trophic factors; we, therefore, hypothesized that CBS could be an excellent candidate for neuroprotection. Here, we investigate whether CBS-based eye drops might mitigate the effects of light-induced retinal degeneration in albino rats. CBS treatment significantly preserved flash-electroretinogram (f-ERG) response after LD and reduced the "hot-spot" extension. Besides, CBS-treated animals better preserved the morphology of the outer nuclear layer, together with a reduction in microglia migration and activation. Interestingly, the treatment did not modulate reactive gliosis and activation of the self-protective mechanism (FGF2). In conclusion, our results suggest that CBS-based eye drops might be successfully used to mitigate retinal neurodegenerative processes such as AMD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We investigated the effects of continuous artificial light exposure on the mouse substantia nigra (SN). A three month exposure of C57Bl/6J mice to white fluorescent light induced a 30% reduction in dopamine (DA) neurons in SN compared to controls, accompanied by a decrease of DA and its metabolites in the striatum. After six months of exposure, neurodegeneration progressed slightly, but the level of DA returned to the basal level, while the metabolites increased with respect to the control. Three month exposure to near infrared LED light (∼710 nm) did not alter DA neurons in SN, nor did it decrease DA and its metabolites in the striatum. Furthermore mesencephalic cell viability, as tested by [ 3 H]DA uptake, did not change. Finally, we observed that 710 nm LED light, locally conveyed in the rat SN, could modulate the firing activity of extracellular-recorded DA neurons. These data suggest that light can be detrimental or beneficial to DA neurons in SN, depending on the source and wavelength. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]