1. Variations of network centralities between playing positions in favorable and unfavorable close and unbalanced scores during the 2018 FIFA World Cup
- Author
-
Filipe Manuel Clemente, Hugo Sarmento, Gibson Moreira Praça, Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis, Thomas Rosemann, Beat Knechtle, and University of Zurich
- Subjects
11035 Institute of General Practice ,Redes de relações sociais ,social network analysis ,graph theory ,lcsh:BF1-990 ,Observational analysis ,610 Medicine & health ,Copa do mundo (Futebol) ,050105 experimental psychology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Notational analysis ,association football ,Statistics ,Psychology ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Adjacency matrix ,performance analysis ,Desempenho ,Social network analysis ,General Psychology ,Original Research ,Degree (graph theory) ,05 social sciences ,Performance analysis ,Jogadores de futebol ,3200 General Psychology ,Graph theory ,Observação ,Association football ,lcsh:Psychology ,Teoria dos grafos ,observational analysis ,notational analysis ,Centrality ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Social Network Analysis - Abstract
The purpose of this study is twofold: (i) analyze the variations of network centralities between close (difference of goals equal to one) and unbalanced (difference of goals equal to or greater than two) scores; and (ii) compare the centrality levels between playing positions. The passing sequences that occurred during the sixty-four matches played by the thirty-two national teams that participated in the 2018 FIFA World Cup were analyzed and coded. The network centralities of degree prestige and degree centrality were calculated based on the weighted adjacency matrices built from the passing sequences. The results reveal that higher degree centralities of midfielders occurred in unfavorable (lost) unbalanced scores (p = 0.046; ES (effect size) = 0.472). Moreover, in favorable (won) matches the higher values of degree centrality of central defenders (p = 0.014; ES: 0.458) and defensive midfielders (p = 0.004; ES: 0.715) were also found in unbalanced scores. The comparisons between positions revealed that the highest and significant degree prestige levels were found in defensive midfielders in both close (12.10%) and unbalanced scores (10.95%). In conclusion, it is possible to observe that winning by an unbalanced score significantly increased the centrality levels of the wingers and forwards in comparison to close scores. Moreover, it was also found that independent of the final score or the unbalanced score level, the defensive midfielders were the most prominent or recruited players during the passing sequences.
- Published
- 2019