Search

Objectives To address disparities in adverse birth outcomes, communities are challenged to improve the quality of health services and foster systems integration. The purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of Medicaid-insured women about their experiences of perinatal care (PNC) across a continuum of clinical and community-based services. Methods Three focus groups (N = 21) were conducted and thematic analysis methods were used to identify basic and global themes about experiences of care. Women were recruited through a local Federal Healthy Start (HS) program in Michigan that targets services to African American women. Results Four basic themes were identified: (1) Pursuit of PNC; (2) Experiences of traditional PNC; (3) Enhanced prenatal and postnatal care; and (4) Women's health: A missed opportunity. Two global themes were also identified: (1) Communication with providers, and (2) Perceived socio-economic and racial bias. Many women experienced difficulties engaging in early care, getting more help, and understanding and communicating with their providers, with some reporting socio-economic and racial bias in care. Delays in PNC limited early access to HS and enhanced prenatal care (EPC) programs with little evidence of supportive transitions to primary care. Notably, women's narratives revealed few connections among clinical and community-based services. Conclusions The process of participating in PNC and community-based programs is challenging for women, especially for those with multiple health problems and living in difficult life circumstances. PNC, HS and other EPC programs could partner to streamline processes, improve the content and process of care, and enhance engagement in services., Author(s): Lee Anne Roman [sup.1] , Jennifer E. Raffo [sup.2] , Katherine Dertz [sup.3] , Bonita Agee [sup.4] , Denise Evans [sup.4] , Katherine Penninga [sup.5] , Tiffany Pierce [sup.5] [...]

Introduction Federal and state policies often require utilization of evidence-based home visiting programs. Measurement of specified interventions is important for tracking program implementation and achieving program outcomes. Thus, the Strong Beginnings program worked to define community health worker (CHW) interventions, a core service of the program to improve maternal and child health. Methods A workgroup consisting of CHWs, supervisors and other program staff was created in order to develop and define specific CHW interventions within a nurse or social worker care team. Basic interventions were first compared to the nurse or social worker care coordinator home visiting interventions by risk topic. The evaluator then grouped each CHW intervention into categories per risk domain using thematic analysis and assigned a CHW core function or role based on literature review findings. The workgroup confirmed the results. The workgroup then continued discussions to further enhance CHW interventions per risk domain once the general structure was created. Results The workgroup identified seven core functions and 28 maternal and child health risk topics to be addressed by the CHW. The process resulted in a detailed document of program interventions that the CHWs use to guide care. Conclusions The process helped CHWs feel more valued with their role in team care. The specified interventions will help others understand the CHW role within the care team, ensure consistent interventions are delivered across program partners, provide a foundation to better understand how specific CHW contributions are related to health outcomes, and support program sustainability., Author(s): Jennifer E. Raffo [sup.1] , Celeste Lloyd [sup.2] , Monica Collier [sup.3] , LaDynah Slater [sup.4] , Belinda Cunningham [sup.2] , Katherine Penninga [sup.4] , Susan Henning [sup.2] , [...]

Objectives: Evaluating population health initiatives at the community level necessitates valid counterfactual communities, which includes having similar population composition, health care access, and health determinants. Estimating appropriate county counterfactuals is challenging in states with large intercounty variation. We describe an application of K -means cluster analysis for determining county-level counterfactuals in an evaluation of an intervention, a county perinatal system of care for Medicaid-insured pregnant women. Methods: We described counties by using indicators from the American Community Survey, Area Health Resources Files, University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute County Health Rankings, and vital records for Michigan Medicaid-insured births for 2009, the year the intervention began (or the closest available year). We ran analyses of 1000 iterations with random starting cluster values for each of a range of number of clusters from 3 to 10 with commonly used variability and reliability measures to identify the optimal number of clusters. Results: The use of unstandardized features resulted in the grouping of 1 county with the intervention county in all solutions for all iterations and the frequent grouping of 2 additional counties with the intervention county. Standardized features led to no solution, and other distance measures gave mixed results. However, no county was ideal for all subpopulation analyses. Practice Implications: Although the K -means method was successful at identifying comparison counties, differences between the intervention county and comparison counties remained. This limitation may be specific to the intervention county and the constraints of a within-state study. This method could be more useful when applied to other counties in and outside Michigan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Enhanced prenatal/postnatal care home visiting programs for Medicaid-insured women have significant positive impacts on care and health outcomes. However, enhanced prenatal care participation rates are typically low, enrolling <30% of eligible women. This study investigates the impacts of a population-based systems approach on timely enhanced prenatal care participation and other healthcare utilization.Methods: This quasi-experimental, population-based, difference-in-differences study used linked birth certificates, Medicaid claims, and enhanced prenatal care data from complete statewide Medicaid birth cohorts (2009 to 2015), and was analyzed in 2019-2020. The population-based system intervention included cross-agency leadership and work groups, delivery system redesign with clinical-community linkages, increased enhanced prenatal care-Community Health Worker care, and patient empowerment. Outcomes included enhanced prenatal care participation and early participation, prenatal care adequacy, emergency department contact, and postpartum care.Results: Enhanced prenatal care (7.4 percentage points, 95% CI=6.3, 8.5) and first trimester enhanced prenatal care (12.4 percentage points, 95% CI=10.2, 14.5) increased among women served by practices with established clincial-community linkages, relative to that among the comparator group. First trimester enhanced prenatal care improved in the county (17.9, 95% CI=15.7, 20.0), emergency department contact decreased in the practices (-11.1, 95% CI= -12.3, -9.9), and postpartum care improved in the county (7.1, 95% CI=6.0, 8.2). Enhanced prenatal care participation for Black women served by the practices improved (4.4, 95% CI=2.2, 6.6) as well as early enhanced prenatal care (12.3, 95% CI=9.0, 15.6) and use of postpartum care (10.4, 95% CI=8.3, 12.4).Conclusions: A population systems approach improved selected enhanced prenatal care participation and service utilization for Medicaid-insured women in a county population, those in practices with established clinical-community linkages, and Black women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Michigan Maternal and Infant Health Program (MIHP) is a population-based home-visitation program providing care coordination, referrals, and visits based on a plan of care. MIHP is available to all Medicaid-eligible pregnant women and infants aged ≤1 year in Michigan. Purpose: To assess the effects of MIHP participation on maternal and infant healthcare utilization. Methods: Propensity-score matching methods were used to assess differences in healthcare utilization between MIHP participants and nonparticipants using 2009—2010 Medicaid claims and administrative data obtained from the Michigan Department of Community Health. Data were analyzed between October 2011 and March 2013. Results: MIHP participants had higher odds of receiving any prenatal care compared to matched women not participating in MIHP (OR=2.94, 95% CI=2.43, 3.60) and higher odds of receiving adequate prenatal care (OR=1.06, 95% CI=1.01, 1.11). MIHP participants had higher odds of receiving an appropriately timed postnatal visit (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.43, 1.57). Infants participating in MIHP had higher odds of receiving any well-child visits over the first year of life (OR=1.70, 95% CI=1.51, 1.93) and higher odds of receiving the appropriate number of well-child visits over their first year of life (OR=1.47, 95% CI=1.35, 1.60) compared to matched nonparticipant infants. Conclusions: The results from Michigan provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of a Medicaid-sponsored population-based home-visitation program in improving maternal prenatal and postnatal care and infant care. This evidence is important to consider as the federal healthcare reform is implemented and states are making decisions on the expansion of the Medicaid program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We used administrative and screening data from 2009 to 2010 to determine if Healthy Start (HS), an enhanced prenatal services program, is reaching the most vulnerable African American women in Kent County, Michigan. Women in HS are at higher risk of key predictors of birth outcomes compared with other women. To advance toward evidence-based HS program evaluations in the absence of randomized controlled trials, future studies using comparison groups need to appropriately establish baseline equivalence on a variety of risk factors related to birth outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]