Search

Piotr Kuna,1 Marek Jutel,2,3 Grazyna Pulka,4 Slawomir Tokarski,5 Paula Arranz,6 Gonzalo Hernández,6 Nieves Fernández Hernando6 1Department of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland; 2Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland; 3All-Med Medical Research Institute, Wrocław, Poland; 4Centrum Medyczne All-Med, Krakòw, Poland; 5Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszow, Poland; 6Department of Research, Development and Innovation, FAES FARMA, Leioa, Bizkaia, SpainCorrespondence: Nieves Fernández Hernando, FAES FARMA, S.A, Av. Autonomía 10, Leioa, Bizkaia, 48940, Spain, Tel +34 94 481 83 00, Email nfernandez@faes.esPurpose: The objective of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of preservative-free bilastine 0.6% ophthalmic solution after 8 weeks of once-daily administration in patients with allergic conjunctivitis (AC).Patients and Methods: Multi-center, international, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase III study of adult patients with seasonal or perennial AC. The study was conducted in 26 centers of 5 European countries. Duration of daily treatment with bilastine 0.6% ophthalmic solution or placebo was 8 weeks. Safety was evaluated by analyzing incidence of ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); additionally, and as secondary parameters, ocular tolerability was assessed, in addition efficacy was also assessed by the average daily total eye symptoms score (TESS).Results: A total of 333 randomized patients with AC were included (bilastine, N=218; placebo, N=115). Mean (SD) age of the patients was 39.9 (13.7) and were 63.7% female. Overall, the percentage of ocular related TEAEs was low, and the percentage of patients with ocular related TEAEs was lower in the bilastine ophthalmic solution group (2.8%) than in the placebo group (4.3%). No severe TEAEs were reported. The ocular symptoms and TESS improved during the trial in both treatment groups. Statistically significant treatment differences were observed at Week 8 for the TESS and all individual ocular symptoms, being significantly better in the bilastine ophthalmic solution group than in placebo group.Conclusion: Bilastine 0.6% ophthalmic solution revealed no safety concerns in patients with AC after 8 weeks of once-daily administration. Bilastine was effective in reducing ocular symptoms associated with AC in response to both seasonal and perennial allergens.Keywords: H1-antihistamine, bilastine, safety, allergic conjunctivitis, ocular allergy, ophthalmic solution

Background GP2015 is a proposed etanercept biosimilar. Objectives To demonstrate equivalent efficacy, and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2015 and the etanercept originator ( ETN, Enbrel®) in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis. Methods In total, 531 eligible patients were randomized 1 : 1 to self-administer GP2015 or ETN twice weekly subcutaneously. Patients with ≥ 50% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index ( PASI 50) at week 12 were rerandomized to continue the same treatment on a once-weekly dosing schedule or to undergo a sequence of three treatment switches between GP2015 and ETN until week 30. Thereafter, patients continued treatment with the product they had been assigned to last, up to week 52. Results The difference in PASI 75 (75% improvement from baseline PASI score) response rates at week 12 between GP2015 and ETN (primary end point) was −2·3%. The 95% confidence interval (−9·85 to 5·30) was well contained within the prespecified margin range of −18 to 18. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events up to week 52 was comparable between continued GP2015 (59·8%) and ETN (57·3%); switching treatments revealed comparable safety profiles. Antidrug antibodies, all non-neutralizing, were limited to five patients on ETN during treatment period 1, and one patient in the switched ETN group, who had been treated with GP2015 for 12 weeks at the time of the finding. Conclusions The EGALITY study demonstrated equivalent efficacy and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2015 and ETN. The study results provide the final clinical confirmation of biosimilarity and contribute to the totality of the evidence proposing that GP2015 is an etanercept biosimilar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background There is evidence that altered blood coagulation and fibrinolysis are involved in the pathogenesis of asthma. Increased thromboembolic risk has been reported in asthmatics. Objective To investigate whether enhanced thrombin generation and impaired fibrinolysis occur in asthmatics. Methods Plasma thrombin generation profile together with a computational assessment of thrombin dynamics and fibrinolytic capacity expressed as clot lysis time ( CLT) were determined in 164 consecutive patients with stable asthma and 72 controls matched for age, gender, weight and smoking. Results Asthma patients had 20.2% increased endogenous thrombin potential ( ETP), 41.4% higher peak thrombin concentration, 61% higher maximal prothrombin conversion rate, 15.5% faster rate of thrombin formation (all, P < 0.0001) and 10% lower thrombin decay capacity ( P = 0.0004) compared with controls. Asthmatics had also 14.4% longer CLT ( P = 0.001) associated with 21.3% higher plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 ( PAI-1) ( P < 0.0001), and 13% higher plasma α2-macroglobulin ( P = 0.0002). Using ETP and CLT above 75th percentile of the control values as the cut-off levels, we found increased risks of enhanced thrombin generation and hypofibrinolysis in asthmatics, also after correction for potential confounders. ETP and CLT were associated inversely with forced expiratory volume in 1 s/vital capacity ( FEV1/ VC) index, after adjustment for age and body mass index. Non-allergic asthma ( n = 70, 42.6%) was characterized by 17.5% longer CLT ( P = 0.02), which positively associated with PAI-1. Thrombin generation profile was not affected by allergy. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance Asthma is associated with enhanced thrombin generation and impaired fibrinolysis, which might contribute to thromboembolic events in this disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. The aim of the study was to assess links between family relationships and severity of dyspnea identified in asthmatic adults. Materials. A total of 131 consecutive, non-selected patients with asthma participated in the study: 88 women (67.18%) and 43 men (32.82%). The mean age of the studied patients was 49.87 years, SD = 13.73. The majority of the study population consisted of patients with grade II (37.74%) and IV (34.91%) of the disease in terms of severity (according to the GINA classification, 2006). Study protocol. All patients underwent functional respiratory tests. The subjective severity of dyspnea was assessed according to the ten-tier Borg scale. To evaluate family functioning values, the Family Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ) was used. Spouses of the asthmatic patients also completed questionnaires. Results. A significant relationship was identified between the values of the dimension: affective expression (assessment of the family performed by the asthmatic patient) and the severity of dyspnea (p = 0.03, r = -0.24) as well as between values of the dimensions: affective expression and affective involvement (as assessed by the spouse of the patient) and severity of dyspnea (p = 0.01, r = 0.39; p = 0.02, r = 0.34, respectively). The relationship between the severity of dyspnea declared by the patient and the FAQ dimension: Task accomplishment (as assessed by the spouse of the patient) was borderline (statistical significance [p = 0.06]). Conclusions. (1) A relationship can be observed between the functioning of the asthmatic patient's family and the severity of the patient's declared dyspnea. Dyspnea constitutes a specific form of emotional communication in the inter-spouse relationships. (2) An analysis of the severity of dyspnea in asthmatic patients should take into account the context of the functioning of the patient's family. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Eosinophils are one of the major effector cells in bronchial asthma. Their infiltration of airways correlates with the asthma severity. Recruitment and activation of eosinophils are partially mediated by integrins α4β1 and α4β7. Collagens type I and IV constitute important components of extracellular matrix and vascular basement membrane, respectively. Therefore, collagen-binding integrins (α1β1 and α2β1) may also play a role in eosinophil lung infiltration. Objective To evaluate the possible presence of α1β1 and α2β1 integrins on peripheral blood eosinophils from asthmatic subjects. Methods Collagen receptors were studied on eosinophils separated by immunomagnetic CD16-negative method from healthy donors ( n=13) and patients with moderate persistent atopic bronchial asthma ( n=15). Surface receptor identification was performed by flow cytometry and cell adhesion assay. Results Eosinophils isolated from the patients showed increased expression of both α1β1 and α2β1 integrins as compared with healthy controls. Moreover, adhesive function of eosinophils to collagen type IV was inhibited by snake venom disintegrins: viperistatin and obtustatin. These disintegrins contain KTS active motif and are specific inhibitors of α1β1 integrin. Conclusion We demonstrated for the first time that collagen receptors: α1β1 and α2β1 integrins are overexpressed on the surface of peripheral blood eosinophils of asthmatic subjects. Further studies may reveal potential application of KTS-disintegrins or their structural analogs for therapy of bronchial asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: SB17 is a biosimilar to reference ustekinumab (UST). We compared the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of SB17 to UST up to Week 52, including switching from UST to SB17., Methods: Subjects were randomized to receive 45 mg of SB17 or UST subcutaneously up to Week 40. At Week 28, subjects from the UST treatment group were re-randomized to either switch to SB17 or continue UST. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity were assessed up to Week 52., Results: Among baseline randomized 503 subjects, 481 subjects were re-randomized at Week 28; continuing SB17 (SB17 + SB17, n  = 237), switching from UST to SB17 (UST+SB17, n  = 122) or continuing UST (UST+UST, n  = 122). The percent change from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was comparable between treatment groups up to Week 52 (SB17 + SB17: 95.8%, UST+SB17: 95.6%, UST+UST: 94.5% at Week 52). Other efficacy endpoints were also comparable. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (SB17 + SB17: 16.5%, UST+SB17: 13.9%, UST+UST: 23.8%) and the overall incidence of anti-drug antibodies occurring after transition were comparable between treatment groups (SB17 + SB17: 5.6%, UST+SB17: 5.1%, and UST+UST: 6.7%)., Conclusion: SB17 demonstrated clinical biosimilarity to UST after switching from UST, and maintained long-term comparable efficacy and safety with UST up to Week 52.

Background: BAT2206 is a proposed biosimilar to reference ustekinumab (UST, Stelara®)., Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of BAT2206 with UST at two treatment periods, i.e., a 28-week initial treatment period 1 (TP1) and a 24-week secondary TP2. This paper describes the results of TP1., Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, Phase III study, adult patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were randomized (1:1) to receive BAT2206 or UST until Week 28 in TP1. The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline (CfB) in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score to Week 8 or 12. The secondary endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity parameters., Results: 278 patients were each randomized into the BAT2206 or UST groups. At Weeks 8 and 12, the least squares (LS) mean difference (standard error) for percent CfB in PASI score was 0.964 (1.8952) and 1.774 (1.4912), respectively, and the LS mean difference confidence intervals all completely fell within the predefined equivalence margins. Comparable results were observed between the treatment groups for secondary endpoints., Limitations: Owing to the length limit, this paper only described the findings from TP1., Conclusions: BAT2206 and UST were comparable in terms of efficacy, safety, PK, and immunogenicity., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Tryptase, a mast cell protease, has been identified as a potential therapeutic target in managing patients with refractory asthma. We assessed the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of MTPS9579A, an anti-tryptase antibody, in a phase 2a randomized trial for patients with uncontrolled asthma and a phase 1c trial to understand activity within the lower respiratory tract., Methods: Phase 2a patients (n = 134) received 1800 mg MTPS9579A or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was time to the first composite exacerbation event. Phase 1c patients (n = 27) received one intravenous dose of 300 or 1800 mg MTPS9579A or placebo. Both trials measured MTPS9579A concentrations and effects on tryptase in serum and nasal lining fluid; phase 1c also analyzed bronchial lining fluid., Results: MTPS9579A did not meet the primary endpoint (hazard ratio = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.55-1.47; p = 0.6835); exacerbation rates in the placebo group were low. Serum and nasal MTPS9579A pharmacokinetics and tryptase levels were consistent with data from healthy volunteers. However, in phase 1c patients, compared to nasal levels, MTPS9579A bronchial concentrations were 6.8-fold lower, and bronchial active and total tryptase levels were higher (119-fold and 30-fold, respectively). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling predicted intravenous doses of 3800 mg every 4 weeks would be necessary to achieve 95% active tryptase inhibition from baseline., Conclusions: The MTPS9579A dose tested in the phase 2a study was insufficient to inhibit tryptase in bronchial lining fluid, likely contributing to the observed lack of efficacy., (© 2024 Genentech and The Author(s). Allergy published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Ustekinumab (UST) is a safe and effective treatment for moderate-to-severe psoriasis., Objectives: To compare efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of the proposed UST biosimilar SB17 with reference UST in subjects with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis., Methods: In this randomized double-blind study, subjects were randomized to receive 45 mg of SB17 or UST subcutaneously at week 0, 4, and every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at week 12 with an equivalence margin of [-15%, 15%]. Other secondary efficacy, safety, PK, and immunogenicity endpoints were measured through week 28., Results: Two hundred forty-nine subjects were randomized to SB17, 254 to UST. Adjusted difference of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index change from baseline at week 12 of -0.6% (95% confidence interval; -3.780, 2.579) was within the equivalence margin. Physician's Global Assessment and Dermatology Life Quality Index were also comparable. Overall treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable (SB17: 48.2%, UST: 48.8%). The overall incidence of antidrug antibodies up to Week 28 was 13.3% with SB17 and 39.4% with UST., Limitations: Data were only through week 28., Conclusion: SB17 was clinically biosimilar to UST up to week 28., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Feldman has received research, speaking, and/or consulting support from Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline/Stiefel, AbbVie, Janssen, Alovtech, vTv Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Samsung Bioepis, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Amgen, Dermavant, Arcutis, Novartis, Novan, UCB, Helsinn, Sun Pharma, Almirall, Galderma, Leo Pharma, Mylan, Celgene, Ortho Dermatology, Menlo, Merck & Co, Qurient, Forte, Arena, Biocon, Accordant, Argenx, Sanofi, Regeneron, the National Biological Corporation, Caremark, Teladoc, BMS, Ono, Micreos, Eurofins, Informa, UpToDate, and the National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Feldman is founder and part owner of Causa Research and holds stock in Sensal Health. Dr Narbutt is an investigator and/or lecturer for Novartis, Eli Lilly, Almirall, AbbVie, Celltrion, Pfizer, Leo Pharma, Janssen, and UCB and participated in SB17-3001 study as an investigator and received investigational grant from Samsung Bioepis. Dr Girolomoni has received personal fees from AbbVie, Abiogen, Almirall, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli-Lilly, Leo Pharma, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, and Sanofi. Drs Brzezicki, Reznichenko, Zegadlo-Myłik, Pulka, Dmowska-Stecewicz, Klujszo, Rekalov, and Rajzer participated in SB17-3001 study as an investigator and received investigator grants from Samsung Bioepis. Authors J. Lee, M. Lee, and Dr Rho are employees of Samsung Bioepis Co, Ltd and owns stocks of Samsung Biologics., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Telazorlimab is a humanized anti-OX40 monoclonal antibody being studied for treatment of T-cell-mediated diseases., Objective: This randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2b dose-range finding study investigated efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of telazorlimab in subjects with atopic dermatitis., Methods: In this 2-part study (NCT03568162), adults (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe disease were randomized to various regimens of subcutaneous telazorlimab or placebo for 16 weeks' blinded treatment, followed by 38 weeks' open-label treatment and 12 weeks' drug-free follow-up. Telazorlimab treatment groups (following a loading dose) in part 1 were 300 mg every 2 weeks; 300 mg every 4 weeks; or 75 mg every 4 weeks. Part 2 evaluated telazorlimab 600 mg every 2 weeks. The primary end point was percentage change from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at week 16. Safety assessments included incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events., Results: The study randomized 313 subjects in part 1 and 149 in part 2. At 16 weeks, the least squares mean percentage change from baseline in EASI was significantly greater in subjects receiving telazorlimab 300 mg every 2 weeks (part 1) and 600 mg every 2 weeks (part 2) versus placebo (-54.4% vs -34.2% for part 1 and -59.0% vs -41.8% for part 2, P  = .008 for both). Telazorlimab was well tolerated, with similar distribution of adverse events between telazorlimab- and placebo-treated subjects in both part 1 and part 2., Conclusion: Telazorlimab, administered subcutaneously at 300 mg every 2 weeks or 600 mg every 2 weeks following a loading dose, was well tolerated and induced significant and progressive clinical improvement in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis., Competing Interests: Supported by Ichnos Sciences (previously Glenmark Pharmaceuticals SA). The sponsor participated in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the report for publication. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: B. Rewerska, L. D. Sher, S. Alpizar, S. Pauser, G. Pulka, and M. Machkova have received research funding as principal investigators from Ichnos Sciences. V. CA, J. Macoin, V. Anstett, R. Turrini, and C. Konto are current employees of Ichnos Sciences. S. GN is a current employee of Glenmark Pharmaceuticals. N. Mozaffarian, Y. Salhi, W. Jabert, G. Gudi, S. Blein, and M.-A. Doucey are former employees of Ichnos Sciences (formerly Glenmark Pharmaceuticals). C. Martinet is an employee of Keyrus, a contractor for Ichnos Sciences., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Background: AVT02 (adalimumab) is a proposed biosimilar to Humira ® . AVT02 is produced at a 100 mg/mL concentration with a citrate-free formulation., Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of AVT02 versus Humira ® in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis., Methods: This double-blind, randomised, parallel group, active control study of adult subjects compared (at a 1:1 ratio) AVT02 with originator adalimumab 80 mg subcutaneously in Week 1, then 40 mg every other week. At Week 16, subjects who had received originator adalimumab were re-randomised at a 1:1 ratio to continue receiving originator adalimumab, or to switch to AVT02, every other week until Week 48, with final efficacy endpoint at Week 50. Subjects who initially received AVT02 continued to receive AVT02 from Week 16 to Week 48. The primary endpoint was percentage improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score at Week 16. Secondary efficacy endpoints included percentage improvement in PASI score at additional timepoints, change from baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score and number and percentage of subjects achieving static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) responses of 'clear' or 'almost clear'. Additional secondary endpoints included comparison of adverse event profiles, anti-drug antibodies and neutralising antibodies, and serum trough levels of adalimumab at steady state., Results: A total of 413 subjects were randomised (205 to AVT02 and 208 to originator). The percentage improvement in PASI score at Week 16 was 91.6% for AVT02-treated subjects and 89.6% for originator adalimumab. The 90% confidence intervals for the primary endpoint were within the pre-defined equivalence margin of ±10% (90% CI - 0.76 to 5.29; 95% CI - 1.34 to 5.88), and a comparable pattern for DLQI score (11.4-point and 10.6-point improvement in AVT02-treated and originator adalimumab-treated groups, respectively) and sPGA (90.5% in both groups achieving 'clear' or 'almost clear') at Week 16 supported the assessment. Efficacy persisted through Week 50 of the study in all treatment groups, including those who switched from originator adalimumab to AVT02, for percent improvement in PASI score, quality-of-life assessment and sPGA. The safety, tolerability and immunogenicity profiles between AVT02 and originator adalimumab were similar at Week 16, and this persisted in the switched and continued groups through Week 50., Conclusion: Objective and subjective measures of efficacy supported the evaluation of biosimilarity between AVT02 and originator adalimumab at Week 16 and until Week 50, in switched and continued treatment groups. AVT02 was safe and well tolerated, with a safety and immunogenicity profile similar to that observed in originator adalimumab with no clinically meaningful difference between the two., Clinical Trial Registration: EudraCT: 2017-003367-35; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03849404., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy/safety of bilastine in pruritus relief in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) or other pruritic skin diseases. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, exploratory study (EudraCT No.: 2016-001505-17), 115 adults with CSU ( n  = 34), eczema/dermatitis ( n  = 30), prurigo ( n  = 25) or cutaneous pruritus ( n  = 26), received bilastine 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks, or in non-responder patients (<30% improvement in pruritus score at week 2), 40 mg/day from week 2. Results: The mean change in weekly pruritus severity score from baseline to week 8 (primary endpoint) was reduced with bilastine (overall and by disease group); overall, percentage and absolute reductions were 71.16% and 1.63 points, respectively ( p  < .001). Updosed non-responders ( n  = 31) had improved weekly pruritus severity scores from baseline to week 8; percentage and absolute reductions were 49.08% and 1.13 points, respectively ( p  < .001). Bilastine improved the Dermatology Life Quality Index at weeks 4 and 8 ( p  < .001) in all disease groups, and the 7-day Urticaria Activity Score in CSU patients ( p  < .001). Bilastine was well tolerated. Conclusions: Bilastine relieved pruritus associated with urticaria and other skin diseases, with a very good safety profile.

Background: Nemolizumab targets the IL-31 receptor α subunit involved in atopic dermatitis (AD) pathogenesis., Objective: We sought to evaluate a new dosing strategy of nemolizumab in patients with AD., Methods: We performed a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of nemolizumab (10, 30, and 90 mg) subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks versus placebo, with topical corticosteroids in adults with moderate-to-severe AD, severe pruritus, and inadequate control with topical treatment (n = 226). The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), the peak pruritus (PP) numeric rating scale (NRS), and the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) were assessed. Standard safety assessments were performed., Results: Nemolizumab improved EASI, IGA, and/or NRS-itch scores, with the 30-mg dose being most effective. Nemolizumab (30 mg) reduced EASI scores versus placebo at week 24 (-68.8% vs -52.1%, P = .016); significant differences were observed by week 8 (P ≤ .01). With significant improvement (P = .028) as early as week 4, IGA 0/1 rates were higher for 30 mg of nemolizumab versus placebo at week 16 (33.3% vs 12.3%, P = .008) but not week 24 because of an increased placebo/topical corticosteroid effect (36.8% vs 21.1%, P = .06). PP-NRS scores were improved for 30 mg of nemolizumab versus placebo at week 16 (-68.6% vs -34.3%, P < .0001) and week 24 (-67.3% vs -35.8%, P < .0001), with a difference by week 1 (P < .001). NRS response rates (≥4-point decrease) were greater for 30 mg of nemolizumab versus placebo at week 16 (P ≤ .001) and week 24 (P ≤ .01). Nemolizumab was safe and well tolerated. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection., Conclusions: Nemolizumab resulted in rapid and sustained improvements in cutaneous signs of inflammation and pruritus in patients with AD, with maximal efficacy observed at 30 mg. Nemolizumab had an acceptable safety profile., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Nemolizumab, an anti-IL-31 receptor A mAb, improved pruritus, dermatitis, and sleep in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis that was inadequately controlled by topical treatments in a phase II, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (part A; NCT01986933)., Objective: We sought to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of nemolizumab injected subcutaneously every 4 weeks (Q4W) or every 8 weeks (Q8W) in a 52-week, double-blind extension (part B)., Methods: During part B, patients continued the previous nemolizumab dose (0.1, 0.5, or 2.0 mg/kg Q4W or 2.0 mg/kg Q8W). Part B end points included percentage improvement from baseline in pruritus visual analog scale and dermatitis scores (including the Eczema Area and Severity Index)., Results: Overall, 216 of 264 patients completed part A, and 191 entered part B; 131 completed part B. In 153 patients randomized to nemolizumab in part A, improvement from baseline in pruritus visual analog scale score was maintained/increased from weeks 12 to 64, with greatest improvement in the 0.5-mg/kg Q4W group (percentage change from baseline at week 64: -73.0, -89.6, -74.7, and -79.1 in the 0.1-, 0.5-, and 2.0-mg/kg Q4W and 2.0-mg/kg Q8W groups, respectively). Improvement from baseline in dermatitis scores was also maintained/increased to week 64 (percentage change in Eczema Area and Severity Index score: -68.5, -75.8, -78.9, and -69.3 in the 0.1-, 0.5-, and 2.0-mg/kg Q4W and 2.0-mg/kg Q8W groups, respectively). Over 64 weeks, 83% to 89% had 1 or more adverse events, with no new safety concerns identified., Conclusion: Nemolizumab for up to 64 weeks was efficacious and overall well tolerated in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis inadequately controlled by topical therapy., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy is commonly used to treat patients with primary antibody deficiency. This prospective, open-label, non-randomised, multicentre, phase III trial investigated the pharmacokinetics of a new 10% liquid IVIG product (panzyga®; Octapharma) in 51 patients aged 2-75 years with common variable immunodeficiency (n = 43) or X-linked agammaglobulinaemia (n = 8). Patients were treated with IVIG 10% every 3 (n = 21) or 4 weeks (n = 30) at a dose of 200-800 mg/kg for 12 months. Total immunoglobulin G (IgG) and subclass concentrations approximately doubled from pre- to 15 min post-infusion. The maximum concentration of total IgG (mean ± SD) was 21.82 ± 5.83 g/L in patients treated 3-weekly and 17.42 ± 3.34 g/L in patients treated 4-weekly. Median trough IgG concentrations were nearly constant over the course of the study, remaining between 11.0 and 12.2 g/L for patients on the 3-week schedule and between 8.10 and 8.65 g/L for patients on the 4-week schedule. The median terminal half-life of total IgG was 36.1 (range 18.5-65.9) days, with generally similar values for the IgG subclasses (26.7-38.0 days). Median half-lives for specific antibodies ranged between 21.3 and 51.2 days for anti-cytomegalovirus, anti-Haemophilus influenzae, anti-measles, anti-tetanus toxoid, anti-varicella zoster virus antibodies, and anti-Streptococcus pneumoniae subtype antibodies. Overall, IVIG 10% demonstrated pharmacokinetic properties similar to those of other commercial IVIG 10% preparations and 3- or 4-weekly administration achieved sufficient concentrations of IgG, IgG subclasses, and specific antibodies, exceeding the recommended level needed to effectively prevent serious bacterial infections., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Recently we have reported that asthma is associated with enhanced plasma thrombin formation, impaired fibrinolysis and platelet activation. In the present study we investigated whether described prothrombotic blood alterations might predispose to thromboembolic events or asthma exacerbations. In 164 adult asthmatics we assessed clinical events during 3-year follow-up and analyzed their associations with measured at baseline prothrombotic blood parameters. Data were obtained from 157 (95.7%) of the asthma patients. We documented 198 severe asthma exacerbations (64/year), which occurred in 53 subjects (34%). These patients were older (p = 0.004), had worse asthma control (p = 0.02) and lower spirometry values (p = 0.01), at baseline. Interestingly, this subgroup had longer clot lysis time (CLT), as well as lower α 2 -macroglobulin (p = 0.038 and p = 0.04, respectively, after adjustment for potential confounders). Increased CLT and lower α 2 -macroglobulin were demonstrated as independent predictors of asthma exacerbation in multiple regression model. Moreover, we documented two episodes of deep vein thrombosis (1.3%), and eight acute coronary syndromes (5.1%). Patients who experienced thromboembolic events (n = 10, 6.4%, 2.1%/year) had lower α 2 -macroglobulin (p = 0.04), without differences in efficiency of fibrinolysis and thrombin generation. Impaired fibrinolysis and lower levels of α 2 -macroglobulin might predispose to a higher rate of asthma exacerbations, suggesting new links between disturbed hemostasis and asthma.

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of panzyga® (intravenous immunoglobulin 10%) in preventing serious bacterial infections (SBIs) in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs), a prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study and an open-label extension study were undertaken., Methods: Initially, the study drug (infusion rate ≤0.08 mL/kg/min) was administered at intervals of 3 or 4 weeks for 12 months, followed by 3 months of panzyga® at infusion rates increasing from 0.08 to 0.14 mL/kg/min. The primary endpoint in the main study was the rate of SBIs per patient-year on treatment. Secondary outcomes included non-serious infections, work/school absence, episodes of fever, quality of life, and adverse events (AEs)., Results: The main study enrolled 51 patients (35% female, mean age 26.8 years), with 21 participating in the extension study. The rate of SBIs per patient-year was 0.08 in the total population; there were four SBIs in the 4-weekly treatment group (2/30 patients) and none in the 3-weekly group (n = 21). Compared with 4-weekly treatment, 3-weekly treatment was associated with a higher rate of upper respiratory tract infections (RTIs), ear infections, and work/school absences, but a lower rate of lower RTIs and fever. Treatment was generally well tolerated; no AE led to treatment withdrawal or death., Conclusions: Overall, the use of panzyga® in patients with antibody-deficient PID was associated with a low rate of AEs and was effective in preventing SBIs, exceeding US FDA and European Medicines Agency recommendations for efficacy.

Recently, we have reported that asthma is associated with enhanced plasma thrombin formation and impaired fibrinolysis. The mechanisms underlying the prothrombotic state in this disease are unknown. Our aim was to investigate whether prothrombotic alterations in asthmatics are associated with inflammation. We studied 164 adult, white, stable asthmatics and 72 controls matched for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and smoking. Plasma tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), interleukin (IL)-6, and serum periostin were evaluated using ELISAs, and their associations with thrombin generation, fibrinolytic capacity, expressed as clot lysis time (CLT), and platelet markers were later analyzed. Asthma was characterized by 62% higher plasma IL-6 and 35% higher TNFα (both, p < 0.0001). Inflammatory cytokines were higher in sporadic and persistent asthmatics compared to controls, also after adjustment for potential confounders. IL-6 was inversely related to the forced expiratory volume in 1 s/vital capacity (FEV 1 /VC) spirometry index after correction for age, sex, and BMI. IL-6 and TNFα were associated with C-reactive protein in asthmatics (β = 0.6 [95% CI, 0.54-0.67] and β = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.25-0.41], respectively) and controls (β = 0.43 [95% CI, 0.29-0.57] and β = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.18-0.48], respectively). In asthma, IL-6 and TNFα positively correlated with the endogenous thrombin potential (β = 0.35 [95% CI, 0.28-0.42] and β = 0.15 [95% CI, 0.07-0.23], respectively) but not with CLT or platelet markers. However, TNFα predicted CLT in a multiple linear regression model. Periostin was not associated with any hemostatic parameters. Enhanced thrombin generation is driven in asthma by a systemic inflammatory state mediated by IL-6 and to a lesser extent TNFα, however, not periostin. TNFα might contribute to impaired fibrinolysis.

Background: Interleukin-31 may play a role in the pathobiologic mechanism of atopic dermatitis and pruritus. We wanted to assess the efficacy and safety of nemolizumab (CIM331), a humanized antibody against interleukin-31 receptor A, in the treatment of atopic dermatitis., Methods: In this phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week trial, we assigned adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis that was inadequately controlled by topical treatments to receive subcutaneous nemolizumab (at a dose of 0.1 mg, 0.5 mg, or 2.0 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo every 4 weeks or an exploratory dose of 2.0 mg of nemolizumab per kilogram every 8 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage improvement from baseline in the score on the pruritus visual-analogue scale (on which a negative change indicates improvement) at week 12. Secondary end points included changes in the score on the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI, on which a negative change indicates improvement), and body-surface area of atopic dermatitis., Results: Of 264 patients who underwent randomization, 216 (82%) completed the study. At week 12, among the patients who received nemolizumab every 4 weeks, changes on the pruritus visual-analogue scale were -43.7% in the 0.1-mg group, -59.8% in the 0.5-mg group, and -63.1% in the 2.0-mg group, versus -20.9% in the placebo group (P<0.01 for all comparisons). Changes on the EASI were -23.0%, -42.3%, and -40.9%, respectively, in the nemolizumab groups, versus -26.6% in the placebo group. Respective changes in body-surface area affected by atopic dermatitis were -7.5%, -20.0%, and -19.4% with nemolizumab, versus -15.7% with placebo. Among the patients receiving nemolizumab every 4 weeks, treatment discontinuations occurred in 9 of 53 patients (17%) in the 0.1-mg group, in 9 of 54 (17%) in the 0.5-mg group, and in 7 of 52 (13%) in the 2.0-mg group, versus in 9 of 53 (17%) in the placebo group., Conclusions: In this phase 2 trial, nemolizumab at all monthly doses significantly improved pruritus in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, which showed the efficacy of targeting interleukin-31 receptor A. The limited size and length of the trial preclude conclusions regarding adverse events. (Funded by Chugai Pharmaceutical; XCIMA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01986933 .).

Introduction: Sensitization to the Hymenoptera venom is one of the main causes of anaphylaxis in Poland. Venom immunotherapy is the only effective treatment in such cases. Comprehensive patient care includes also education. The aim of our study was to assess the state of knowledge and to evaluate the quality of life and the anxiety level in patients allergic to the Hymenoptera venom after anaphylactic reaction., Material and Methods: The survey was carried out in the period of the insects flight in 61 adult subjects (35 wasp and 26 bee allergic), using a validated Vespid Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (VQLQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and subjective assessment of anxiety level. The majority of respondents received venom immunotherapy., Results: Sensitized to the wasp venom had significantly impaired quality of life (VQLQ score) as compared to the bee venom allergic (p = 0.014). The intensity of anxiety decreased with the duration of immunotherapy (p = 0.01). The majority of subjects knew how to recognize and treat anaphylaxis, but only 8% employed an identification card and about 50% implemented rules of the pre-exposition prophylaxis., Conclusions: History of a severe anaphylaxis to the Hymenoptera venom affected the quality of life. Venom immunotherapy reduced anxiety. We hope that presented surveys and their results might be useful in qualifying for immunotherapy in clinically uncertain cases.

Introduction: While spirometry plays a key role in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), imaging methods including endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and chest computed tomography (CT) appear to be useful for investigating structural changes in the lungs., Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate remodeling in COPD patients using EBUS and chest CT., Patients and Methods: The study included 33 patients with COPD, 15 patients with severe asthma, and 15 control subjects. All subjects underwent pulmonary function tests and bronchoscopy with EBUS to measure the total thickness of the bronchial wall and its layers. Additionally, in COPD patients, a chest CT was performed to measure total bronchial wall thickness., Results: The total bronchial wall thickness measured by EBUS in patients with COPD (1.192 ±0.079 mm) was significantly smaller than that in asthmatic patients (1.433 ±0.230 mm, P = 0.001) and significantly greater than in control subjects (1.099 ±0.095 mm, P = 0.04), and was positively correlated with residual volume (RV) / total lung capacity (r = 0.5, P = 0.02), RV (r = 0.6, P = 0.007), and RV (%) (r = 0.5, P = 0.05). The thickness of the bronchial wall layers in patients with COPD were as follows: L1 = 0.135 ±0.018 mm, L2 = 0.151 ±0.026 mm, and L3-5 = 0.906 ±0.065 mm. There was no correlation between the thickness of the bronchial wall layers and forced expiratory volume in 1 second., Conclusions: The results of this study show that EBUS is a useful method for evaluating bronchial wall layers not only in asthma but also in COPD, and suggest that the pattern of remodeling differs in each of these diseases.

Introduction: Adhesive molecules, particularly selectins and integrins, are critical for the inflammatory cell trafficking from blood to the lungs. Among integrins, the most important for cell infiltration are those containing α₄ and β₂ subunits., Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of α₁ and α₂ integrin subunits on peripheral blood T cells in asthmatic subjects, because previously we showed evidence that α₁β₁ and α₂β₁ integrins may be found on peripheral blood eosinophils in these subjects. In this study, we also analyzed the expression of α₄ and β₁ subunits as a positive reference., Patients and Methods: Expression of α₁, α₂, α₄, and β₁ subunits was analyzed by flow cytometry on CD₄+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes obtained from the peripheral blood of 54 clinically stable, asymptomatic, mild-to-moderate persistent asthmatics and 40 healthy controls., Results: The α₁ subunit was not present on peripheral blood T cells in the majority of subjects in both study groups. Expression of α₂ was detectable on CD8+ cells in both groups and was increased on CD4+ in asthmatics. Both types of T cells showed higher expression of α₄ and β₁ in patients with asthma. Expression of α₄ was higher on CD8+ T cells both in asthmatics and controls., Conclusions: Expression of α₄ and β₁ integrin subunits is increased on peripheral blood T cells in patients with asthma, which confirms the preactivation of blood lymphocytes even in stable and asymptomatic disease. The biological role of α₂ subunit on T cells remains to be elucidated.

Background: Fluticasone and formoterol are well established medications for the treatment of asthma. This study (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00734318) compares the efficacy and safety of a combination of these drugs in a single inhaler (fluticasone/formoterol) versus the individual components (fluticasone + formoterol)., Methods: Patients aged ≥ 18 years (n=620) with a history of severe, persistent reversible asthma for ≥ 6 months prior to screening were included in this randomized, double-blind study, which consisted of a screening phase of up to 5 days, a 2-week run-in phase and an 8-week treatment period., Results: Fluticasone/formoterol (500/20 μg, b.i.d.) was at least as effective as fluticasone + formoterol (500 μg + 24 μg, b.i.d.) with respect to the primary outcome measure: there were similar increases in mean pre-morning dose forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1)) in these two groups. Fluticasone/formoterol (500/20 μg, b.i.d.) also demonstrated similar efficacy to fluticasone + formoterol in terms of change in mean FEV(1) from baseline pre-morning dose to 2 h post-morning dose at week 8, as well as for several secondary parameters. Fluticasone/formoterol (500/20 μg, b.i.d.) demonstrated superiority to fluticasone monotherapy (500 μg, b.i.d.) and fluticasone/formoterol (100/10 μg, b.i.d.) for several secondary efficacy parameters. Fluticasone/formoterol had a similar safety and tolerability profile to fluticasone + formoterol., Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the fluticasone/formoterol combination is at least as effective as its components administered concurrently from separate inhalers. Fluticasone/formoterol (500/20 μg, b.i.d.) showed superior efficacy to its inhaled corticosteroid component alone and the efficacy of fluticasone/formoterol was dose-dependent for several clinically important parameters., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is a new technique that enables the assessment of bronchial wall layers. The aim of the study was to verify the utility of EBUS for the assessment of bronchial wall remodeling in patients with asthma., Methods: In 35 patients with asthma and 23 control subjects, high-resolution CT (HRCT) scanning and EBUS were used to measure bronchial wall thickness in the 10th segment of the right lung. With a radial 20-MHz probe, EBUS identified the 5-laminar structure of the bronchial wall. Layer 1 (L(1)) and layer 2 (L(2)) were analyzed separately, and layers 3 through 5 (L(3-5)), which corresponded to cartilage, were analyzed jointly. Digitalized EBUS images were used for the quantitative assessment of bronchial wall thickness and the wall area (WA) of the layers. Finally, bronchial biopsy specimens were taken for measuring the thickness of the reticular basement membrane (RBM). The thickness and WA of the bronchial wall layers, which were assessed using EBUS, were correlated with FEV(1) and RBM., Results: There was no significant difference in the measurements of total bronchial wall thickness using EBUS and HRCT scanning. The thickness and WA of the bronchial wall and its layers were significantly greater in patients with asthma than in the control subjects. A negative correlation among the thicknesses of L(1), L(2), and L(3-5) and FEV(1), and a positive correlation with RBM were observed only in the patients with asthma., Conclusions: EBUS allows precise measurement of the thickness and WA of bronchial wall layers. The correlation of these parameters with asthma severity suggests implementation of EBUS in the assessment of bronchial wall remodeling in patients with asthma.

Background: Air trapping evaluated in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) reflects changes in small bronchi. We simultaneously evaluated focal and diffuse air trapping in asthmatic patients., Objectives: (1) To evaluate air trapping and bronchial wall thickness in asthmatics. (2) To estimate the relationship between air trapping and bronchial wall thickness, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), age, gender and asthma severity. (3) To compare air trapping between subgroups of asthmatic patients with normal FEV(1) % pred. and FEV(1)/FVC % and controls. (4) To compare air trapping and bronchial wall thickness between aspirin-induced asthmatics (AIA) and aspirin-tolerant asthmatics (ATA)., Methods: Both groups (asthmatics and controls) included 30 patients. All patients underwent HRCT and PFTs., Results: Focal (p < 0.0001) and diffuse (p = 0.0004) air trappings and bronchial wall thickness (T: p < 0.0001; T/D: p < 0.0001; WA%: p < 0.0001) were significantly greater in asthmatics. Focal and diffuse air trappings were inversely correlated (p = 0.021). Diffuse air trapping correlated with bronchial wall thickness: T/D (p = 0.047), T (p = 0.037), and WA% (p = 0.048). There was a significant difference in the extent of focal air trapping between a subgroup of asthmatics with normal FEV(1) % pred. and FEV(1)/FVC % and controls (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in focal (p = 0.095) and diffuse air trapping (p = 0.186) and bronchial wall thickness (T: p = 0.086; T/D: p = 0.428; WA%: p = 0.428) between AIA and ATA patients., Conclusions: Both focal and diffuse air trappings provide valuable diagnostic information and therefore deserve to be estimated. The lack of significant differences in air trapping and bronchial wall thickness between AIA and ATA patients needs further investigation., (Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.)