Search

To explore the sensitivity to change in power Doppler (PD) enthesitis in active spondyloarthritis (SpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. This was a longitudinal study in patients with SpA and PsA with active disease [patients starting or switching to biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)]. The MAdrid Sonographic Enthesitis Index (MASEI) was performed at baseline and at 3 and 6 month visits. The MASEI and Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) PD enthesitis definitions were checked. Reliability analysis among three readers was performed with ultrasound (US)-recorded videos. US examinations of 25 patients were included; 16 (64%) had SpA and nine (36%) PsA. The median (interquartile range, IQR) age was 49 (41–61) years, and 13 patients (52%) were female. The median (IQR) 28-joint Disease Activity Score of 3.6 (2.3–4.2), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index of 6.7 (6.1–7.4), and C-reactive protein value of 8.2 (1.6–20) reflected moderate to high disease activity at baseline. Both MASEI and OMERACT PD enthesitis improved significantly at 3 and 6 month follow-up (p < 0.05) and showed sensitivity to change (standard error of measurement = 0.47 and 0.61, respectively). Improvement in clinical activity outcomes was significantly associated with decreases in MASEI and OMERACT PD enthesitis counts (p < 0.05). The MASEI and OMERACT PD definitions had excellent reliability (kappa = 0.918 and 0.865, respectively). PD enthesitis significantly improved at 3 and 6 month follow-up in patients undergoing bDMARD therapy. Both MASEI and OMERACT PD US enthesitis reflect response to treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate whether serum infliximab trough levels (ITL) during the early stages of treatment are predictive of long-term clinical failure in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Longitudinal observational study involving 81 patients with axSpA monitored during infliximab therapy. Serum ITL were measured before starting infliximab treatment and at weeks 2 (W2), W6 and W12 of treatment. Disease activity was assessed by Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at baseline, W24 and W52, and every 6 months thereafter until treatment discontinuation, regardless of the reason. Non-clinically important improvement was defined by ΔASDAS<1.1. The association between serum levels during the early stages and clinical outcomes (non-clinically important improvement at W52, drug survival and drop-out due to secondary inefficacy) was investigated through logistic regression models and Kaplan Meier curves. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to determine the best cut-off for serum ITL. Out of the 81 patients, 45 (56%) did not achieve clinical improvement at W52. These patients had lower serum ITL at W12 compared to those who improved: ITL [median (IQR)]: 4.1(0.9-8.3) µg/mL vs 7.1 (4.3–11.3) µg/mL, respectively;p = 0.007). ITL<6.7 µg/mL at W12 was significantly associated with: i) not achieving clinical improvement at W52 (OR: 2.3; 95%CI: 1.3–3.9); ii) shorter drug survival (5.0 years (95% CI 3.8–6.2) vs 7.0 years (95% CI 4.8–6.9; p = 0.04), and iii) higher drop-out rates due to secondary inefficacy (OR: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.2–10.2). Low serum ITL at W12 were associated with long-term clinical failure in patients with axSpA, due to secondary inefficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on a study which shows that patients with psoriasis have a unique profile of phenotype of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) compared with controls. It states that presence of a low percentage of CD4+ T cells producing interferon (IFN) and of high percentages of B cells could help to identify patients not responding to classic treatments. It states that single analysis of PBMC could provide a valuable indicator to predict the need to introduce a targeted therapy.

Objective: To update the consensus document of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) regarding the use of targeted biological and synthetic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with the aim of assisting clinicians in their therapeutic decisions., Methods: A panel of 13 experts was assembled through an open call by SER. We employed a mixed adaptation-elaboration-update methodology starting from the 2015 Consensus Document of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on the use of biological therapies in RA. Starting with systematic reviews (SR) of recommendations from EULAR 2019, American College of Rheumatology 2021, and GUIPCAR 2017, we updated the search strategies for the PICO questions of GUIPCAR. An additional SR was conducted on demyelinating disease in relation to targeted biological and synthetic therapies. Following the analysis of evidence by different panelists, consensus on the wording and level of agreement for each recommendation was reached in a face-to-face meeting., Results: The panel established 5 general principles and 15 recommendations on the management of RA. These encompassed crucial aspects such as the importance of early treatment, therapeutic goals in RA, monitoring frequency, the use of glucocorticoids, the application of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), biological DMARDs (bDMARDs), and targeted synthetic DMARDs. Additionally, recommendations on dose reduction of these drugs in stable patients were included. This update also features recommendations on the use of bDMARDs and Janus Kinase inhibitors in some specific clinical situations, such as patients with lung disease, a history of cancer, heart failure, or demyelinating disease., Conclusions: This update provides recommendations on key aspects in the management of RA using targeted biological and synthetic therapies., (Copyright © 2024 Sociedad Española de Reumatología (SER), Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología (CMR) and Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: The EXXELERATE study revealed poorer clinical outcomes in patients treated with adalimumab (ADL) and baseline rheumatoid factor (RF) above 203 IU/mL. However, responses were similar in patients treated with certolizumab pegol (CZP) regardless of RF levels., Objectives: This study investigated the impact of RF levels >203 IU/mL on TNF inhibitors (TNFi) serum levels and the association with secondary nonresponse in RA patients treated with TNFi., Methods: We performed an observational ambispective study with RA patients treated with infliximab (IFX), ADL, or CZP. Patients were stratified according to baseline RF levels: ≤ or >203 IU/mL. After 6 months, serum drug levels and antidrug antibodies were measured, and reasons for discontinuation were collected., Results: We included 170 RA patients: 90 (53%) received IFX, 48 (28%) ADL, and 32 (19%) CZP. While CZP serum levels did not differ between RF groups at 6 months ( p  = 0.6), RF levels >203 IU/mL were linked to lower serum drug levels in patients treated with IFX ( p  = 0.09) or ADL ( p  = 0.02). Secondary nonresponse was 3.6 times higher in patients with high versus low RF levels in patients under IFX or ADL. However, the reasons for withdrawal were not affected by RF levels in patients treated with CZP., Conclusion: Baseline RF above 203 IU/mL is associated with lower serum drug levels and an increased risk of discontinuation due to secondary nonresponse in patients treated with IFX or ADL. In contrast, drug levels and clinical outcomes are not significantly impacted by baseline RF levels in patients under CZP., Competing Interests: CP-R has received research grants/honoraria from AbbVie, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, and Roche. MN-N has received research grants/honoraria from Galápagos, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, and UCB. AB received grant/research support and fees for consultancies or as a speaker from AbbVie, Amgen, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, Lilly, UCB, and Roche. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Plasencia-Rodríguez, Martínez-Feito, Novella-Navarro, Pérez De Diego, Bonilla, Gehin, Villalba-Yllán, Nuño, Pascual-Salcedo, Nozal, Almirón and Balsa.)

Objectives: To evaluate the survival of different biologic or targeted-synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARD) administered after fulfilling difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) criteria, and to assess factors related to treatment discontinuation., Methods: Retrospective study including D2TRA patients. Drug retention of the b/tsDMARD administered after fulfilling D2TRA was assessed by Kaplan-Meier plots and the log-rank test. Cox hazard models were used to identify factors affecting treatment discontinuation., Results: Of the 122 patients included, 75 maintained active treatment (61.5%) with a subsequent line after D2T compared to 47 (38.5%) who discontinued and required more successive lines of b/tsDMARDs. The median survival of the treatments was 78.3(7.6) months and the treatment after D2T with the better rate of survival was rituximab, followed by JAKi and IL6Ri, while worse survival rates were associated with abatacept and TNFi. Significant differences were noted among b/tsDMARDs (log-rank p < 0.01) and to evaluate these differences, a Cox regression was performed, taking each b/tsDMARD as a reference and comparing it with the others. DAS28 values 6-months after initiation of treatment were higher in those patients who discontinued treatment [4.4(1.2) vs 3.5(1.3), p = 0.01]. The multivariate cox regression model revealed that treatment choice after D2T [HR = 1.26(95%CI 1.06-1.05)] and lower DAS28 values at 6 months [HR = 1.49(95%CI 1.16-1.52)] were independent risk factors associated with treatment discontinuation., Conclusions: Once patients met the D2TRA criteria, the subsequent line of b/tsDMARDs with the best survival rates were rituximab, JAKi and IL6Ri. Moreover, DAS28 at 6-months of treatment after D2T was an independent risk factor for drug discontinuation. Key Points • Rituximab, IL6Ri and JAKi have better retention rates in patients after fulfilling D2TRA criteria • Clinical disease activity in the first six months after fulfillment of D2TRA criteria is an independent risk factor of subsequent treatment survival., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).)

Objectives: Certolizumab pegol (CZP), an Fc-free antibody fragment, has shown stable serum levels and steady efficacy in the treatment of RA patients, irrespective of RF levels at baseline. Here, we examine, in clinical practice, the effect of baseline RF and ACPA levels on serum drug levels of IFX, ADL and CZP an Fc-free antibody fragment., Methods: This is a retrospective study performed in real-world patients. We assessed 170 patients with RA: 90 (53%) received IFX, 48 (28%) ADL and 32 (19%) CZP. Demographic and clinical variables, RF and ACPA levels were obtained at the baseline visit (T0), and patients were stratified based on negative, low, medium, or high levels. After 6 months (T6) serum drug levels and anti-drug antibodies (ADAb), were computed., Results: While CZP serum levels did not differ across RF groups at T6, high baseline RF was linked to lower serum drug levels compared to RF negative status in treatment with complete monoclonal antibodies IFX and ADL. No differences in disease activity measured by DAS28 at baseline were observed across RF quartiles in patients treated with IFX or ADL. ADAb was observed in 26 patients with IFX, 3 with ADL and 1 with CZP, following 6 months of treatment. Patients with high baseline RF levels dropped out more frequently by secondary non-response in IFX or ADL than CZP (80% vs. 75% vs. 33%, p=0.002)., Conclusions: In this real word data evaluation, CZP serum levels were independent of RF levels in patients however patients with high baseline RF levels who obtained IFX or ADL had lower serum drug levels at 6 months than baseline RF-negative patients. In addition, secondary non-response was more frequent in patients with high RF levels treated with IFX and ADL.

Background: Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) are chronic diseases that may alternate between asymptomatic periods and flares. These conditions require complex treatments and close monitoring by rheumatologists to mitigate their effects and improve the patient's quality of life. Often, delays in outpatient consultations or the patient's difficulties in keeping appointments make such close follow-up challenging. For this reason, it is very important to have open communication between patients and health professionals. In this context, implementing telemonitoring in the field of rheumatology has great potential, as it can facilitate the close monitoring of patients with RMDs. The use of these tools helps patients self-manage certain aspects of their disease. This could result in fewer visits to emergency departments and consultations, as well as enable better therapeutic compliance and identification of issues that would otherwise go unnoticed., Objective: The main objective of this study is to evaluate the implementation of a hybrid care model called the mixed attention model (MAM) in clinical practice and determine whether its implementation improves clinical outcomes compared to conventional follow-up., Methods: This is a multicenter prospective observational study involving 360 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondylarthritis (SpA) from 5 Spanish hospitals. The patients will be followed up by the MAM protocol, which is a care model that incorporates a digital tool consisting of a mobile app that patients can use at home and professionals can review asynchronously to detect incidents and follow patients' clinical evolution between face-to-face visits. Another group of patients, whose follow-up will be conducted in accordance with a traditional face-to-face care model, will be assessed as the control group. Sociodemographic characteristics, treatments, laboratory parameters, assessment of tender and swollen joints, visual analog scale for pain, and electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) reports will be collected for all participants. In the MAM group, these items will be self-assessed via both the mobile app and during face-to-face visits with the rheumatologist, who will do the same for patients included in the traditional care model. The patients will be able to report any incidence related to their disease or treatment through the mobile app., Results: Participant recruitment began in March 2024 and will continue until December 2024. The follow-up period will be extended by 12 months for all patients. Data collection and analysis are scheduled for completion in December 2025., Conclusions: This paper aims to provide a detailed description of the development and implementation of a digital solution, specifically an MAM. The goal is to achieve significant economic and psychosocial impact within our health care system by enhancing control over RMDs., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06273306; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06273306., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/55829., (©Marta Novella-Navarro, Jose M Iniesta-Chamorro, Diego Benavent, Javier Bachiller-Corral, Enrique Calvo-Aranda, Helena Borrell, Laura Berbel-Arcobé, Victoria Navarro-Compan, Xabier Michelena, Leticia Lojo-Oliveira, Jaime Arroyo-Palomo, Mariana Diaz-Almiron, Verónica García García, Irene Monjo-Henry, Claudia María Gómez González, Enrique J Gomez, Alejandro Balsa, Chamaida Plasencia-Rodríguez. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 22.04.2024.)

Objective: To assess whether the retention rate of certolizumab pegol (CZP) was longer than that of other tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) based on baseline rheumatoid factor (RF) levels., Methods: Longitudinal, retrospective and multicentre study including patients with RA who were treated with any TNFi (monoclonal antibodies (mAB), etanercept (ETA) or CZP). Log-rank test and Cox regressions were conducted to evaluate the retention rate in the three groups according to the level of RF, with the third quartile of the baseline levels used as cut-off: <200 (

Objectives: To investigate the appearance of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against infliximab (IFX) determined by drug-sensitive and drug-tolerant assays and their relationship with drug levels and drug survival., Methods: This longitudinal observational study included 45 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 61 with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Serum samples were obtained at weeks 2, 6, 12, 24, and 52. Serum IFX levels were measured by a capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and ADA by an in-house drug-sensitive two-site (bridging) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (bELISA) and a commercially available drug-tolerant ELISA (IDK, Immundiagnostik, Germany)., Results: Anti-drug antibodies were detected earlier by IDK than by bELISA. Once ADA appeared, positivity persisted throughout the study period. Patients who were bELISA ADA+ had higher IDK ADA levels (than bELISA ADA- patients). Circulating IFX levels were detected in all patients except those found to be bELISA ADA+. Serum IFX levels were lower in IDK ADA+ than in IDK ADA-patients.Most patients (64%) discontinued due to inefficacy. The early onset of immunogenicity was related to IFX survival. Both in RA and SpA, the median survival (years) was shorter in patients with earlier development of ADA (IDK+ before or at week 24) than those who became IDK+ later (after week 24) or never developed ADA., Conclusion: A drug-tolerant assay detects ADA during IFX therapy earlier and more frequently than a drug-sensitive assay. The onset of immunogenicity detected by drug-tolerant assays is related to the subsequent detection of ADA by drug-sensitive assays and drug survival., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

The emergence of large language models (LLM) with remarkable performance such as ChatGPT and GPT-4, has led to an unprecedented uptake in the population. One of their most promising and studied applications concerns education due to their ability to understand and generate human-like text, creating a multitude of opportunities for enhancing educational practices and outcomes. The objective of this study is twofold: to assess the accuracy of ChatGPT/GPT-4 in answering rheumatology questions from the access exam to specialized medical training in Spain (MIR), and to evaluate the medical reasoning followed by these LLM to answer those questions. A dataset, RheumaMIR, of 145 rheumatology-related questions, extracted from the exams held between 2010 and 2023, was created for that purpose, used as a prompt for the LLM, and was publicly distributed. Six rheumatologists with clinical and teaching experience evaluated the clinical reasoning of the chatbots using a 5-point Likert scale and their degree of agreement was analyzed. The association between variables that could influence the models' accuracy (i.e., year of the exam question, disease addressed, type of question and genre) was studied. ChatGPT demonstrated a high level of performance in both accuracy, 66.43%, and clinical reasoning, median (Q1-Q3), 4.5 (2.33-4.67). However, GPT-4 showed better performance with an accuracy score of 93.71% and a median clinical reasoning value of 4.67 (4.5-4.83). These findings suggest that LLM may serve as valuable tools in rheumatology education, aiding in exam preparation and supplementing traditional teaching methods., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a heterogeneous disease in which therapeutic strategies used have evolved dramatically. Despite significant progress in treatment strategies such as the development of anti-TNF drugs, it is still not possible to differentiate those patients who will respond from who will not. This can lead to effective-treatment delays and unnecessary costs. The aim of this study was to utilize a profile of the patient's characteristics, clinical parameters, immune status (cytokine profile) and artificial intelligence to assess the feasibility of developing a tool that could allow us to predict which patients will respond to treatment with anti-TNF drugs., Methods: This study included 38 patients with RA from the RA-Paz cohort. Clinical activity was measured at baseline and after 6 months of treatment. The cytokines measured before the start of anti-TNF treatment were IL-1, IL-12, IL-10, IL-2, IL-4, IFNg, TNFa, and IL-6. Statistical analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon-Rank-Sum Test and the Benjamini-Hochberg method. The predictive model viability was explored using the 5-fold cross-validation scheme in order to train the logistic regression models., Results: Statistically significant differences were found in parameters such as IL-6, IL-2, CRP and DAS-ESR. The predictive model performed to an acceptable level in correctly classifying patients (ROC-AUC 0.804167 to 0.891667), suggesting that it would be possible to develop a clinical classification tool., Conclusions: Using a combination of parameters such as IL-6, IL-2, CRP and DAS-ESR, it was possible to develop a predictive model that can acceptably discriminate between remitters and non-remitters. However, this model needs to be replicated in a larger cohort to confirm these findings., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: There is a lack of outcome measures for the assessment of physical activity in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). For this matter, the modified Short QUestionnaire to Assess Health (mSQUASH) was developed and validated, originally in Dutch., Objective: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the mSQUASH into Spanish and to evaluate the equivalence of the translated version in patients with axSpA., Methods: The mSQUASH was translated following forward-backward procedure according to the protocol of Beaton. Two bi-lingual translators produced independent forward translations of the mSQUASH into Spanish, and the versions were harmonized in a consensual version. Another translator back translated the synthesized version into Dutch. A scientific committee reached consensus on discrepancies and developed a pre-final version of the questionnaire. The field test with cognitive debriefing involved 10 patients with axSpA with different gender, age, disease duration, educational level and working status., Results: The translation process of the mSQUASH was completed without major issues. The first translation needed several iterations due to small discrepancies in the wording. Back-translation was performed without difficulties, and the scientific committee agreed upon a final version of the questionnaire. Cognitive debriefing showed the Spanish questionnaire to be clear, relevant, understandable and comprehensive. The preliminary version was accepted with minor modifications., Conclusions: The resulting Spanish version of the mSQUASH showed good linguistic and face validity according to the field test, revealing potential for use in clinical practice and research. In order to conclude the cross-cultural adaptation of the mSQUASH into Spanish, the next step is the assessment of psychometric properties of the Spanish version., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Reumatología y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) require a tailored follow-up that can be enhanced by the implementation of innovative tools. The Digireuma study aimed to test the feasibility of a hybrid follow-up utilizing an electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs)-based monitoring strategy in patients with RMDs., Methods: Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) were recruited for a 6-month bicentric prospective follow-up consisting of face-to-face and digital assessments. Patients were asked to report disease-specific ePROs on a pre-established basis, and could also report flares, medication changes, and recent infections at any time. Four rheumatologists monitored these outcomes and contacted patients for interventions when deemed necessary. Results from face-to-face and digital assessments were described., Results: Of 56 recruited patients, 47 (84%) submitted any ePROs to the digital platform. Most patients with RA were female (74%, median age of 47 years), while 48% of patients with SpA were female (median age 40.4 years). A total of 3,800 platform visits were completed, with a median of 57 and 29 visits in patients with RA and SpA, respectively. Among 52 reported alerts, 47 (90%) needed contact, of which 36 (77%) were managed remotely. Adherence rates declined throughout the study, with around half of patients dropping out during the 6 months follow-up., Conclusion: The implementation of a hybrid follow-up in clinical practice is feasible. Digital health solutions can provide granular knowledge of disease evolution and enable more informed clinical decision making, leading to improved patient outcomes. Further research is needed to identify target patient populations and engagement strategies., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: To analyse the trajectories of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), patient global assessment (PGA) and physician global assessment (PhGA) and to assess their predictive capabilities on difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) classification., Methods: Longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from 2020 to 2022. Based on the D2TRA EULAR (European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology) definition, patients were classified as D2TRA according to biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) failure due to inefficacy (D2TRA-inefficacy) or other reasons (D2TRA-other). Patients who did not fulfil the D2TRA criteria were classified as NoD2TRA. DAS28, PGA and PhGA scores collected every 6 months during the first 24 months of b/tsDMARD treatment were used to identify different trajectories using latent class mixed models (LCMM)., Results: The study population comprised 255 patients with RA, of whom 167 were NoD2TRA, 58 D2TRA-inefficacy and 30 D2TRA-other. LCMM stratified patients into two different trajectories for DAS28 and PhGA and three for PGA according to the most stable model. The most notable variation occurred during the first 6 months of treatment, thereafter remaining stable during the follow-up period. Most D2TRA-inefficacy patients fitted the trajectory, showing higher values of the studied parameters. NoD2TRA followed the trajectory with lower values, and D2TRA-other were distributed more homogeneously across all trajectories., Conclusions: The assessment of disease activity, together with patients' and physicians' perceptions, form a key element in the correct discrimination of patients who are going to develop D2TRA-inefficacy. However, identifying those patients who will be D2TRA-other remains challenging, whether by subjective or objective parameters., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MNN reports grants from UCB, Lilly, Galapagos and Janssen outside the submitted work. AV reports grants from Janssen. IM reports grants from Roche, Novartis, UCB and Gedeon Richter outside the submitted work. CP-R reports grants from AbbVie, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly and Roche outside the submitted work. AB reports grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Pfizer, Galapagos, Novartis, Gilead, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, Lilly, UCB and Roche outside the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Real world data on the response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with immunomediated diseases (IMIDs) treated with immunesuppressants is of great interest because vaccine response may be impaired. The main aim was to study the humoral and cellular immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with IMIDs treated with immunosuppressants. The secondary aim was to describe the frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infections after vaccination in these patients., Material and Methods: This is an observational study including 86 patients with IMIDs. All patients were treated with biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [b/tsDMARDs: TNF inhibitors (TNFi), rituximab, anti-interleukin 6 receptor (anti-IL6R) or JAK inhibitors (JAKi)]. Demographic and clinical information were collected. After 4-6 weeks of 2nd and 3rd vaccine doses, humoral response was assessed using the Thermo Scientific ELiA SARS-CoV-2-Sp1 IgG Test. Also, in patients with serum SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels under 100UI/ml, cellular response was analyzed using the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 Starter Pack., Results: A total of 86 patients under b/tsDMARDs and 38 healthy controls were included. Most patients received TNFi (45 with TNFi, 31 with rituximab, 5 with anti-IL6R and 5 with JAKi). SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (Ab) were present in an 86% of patients with IMIDs and in 100% healthy controls (p = 0.017). However, 12 (14%) patients had undetectable SARS-CoV-2 Ab levels, all treated with rituximab. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 Ab (IU/ml) were statistically lower in patients (Mdn (IQR): 59.5 (17-163) in patients vs 625 (405-932) in controls, p < 0.001). Patients treated with rituximab had lower Ab levels than those treated with TNFi and controls (p < 0.001). The cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was evaluated in 30 patients. Eleven patients had a positive cellular response, being more frequent in patients treated with rituximab (p = 0.03). SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported in 43% of patients and 34% of controls after vaccination. Only 6 (7%) patients required hospitalization, most of whom treated with rituximab (67%)., Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels were lower in patients than in controls, especially in patients treated with rituximab. A cellular response can be detected despite having a poor humoral response. Severe infections in vaccinated patients with IMIDs are rare, and are observed mainly in patients treated with rituximab., (© 2023. Canadian Society of Allergy & Clinical Immunology.)

Objectives: To determine the potential impact of sex-specific disease-related characteristics on cardiovascular (CV) disease in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA)., Methods: Cross-sectional study of the Spanish AtheSpAin cohort to study CV disease in axSpA. Data on carotid ultrasound and CV disease and disease-related features were collected., Results: 611 men and 301 women were recruited. Classic CV risk factors were significantly less prevalent in women, who also showed a lower frequency of carotid plaques (p = 0.001), lower carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) values ​​(p<0.001) and CV events (p = 0.008). However, after adjustment for classic CV risk factors, only the differences with respect to carotid IMT remained statistically significant. Women showed higher ESR at diagnosis (p = 0.038), and more active disease (ASDAS, p = 0.012, and BASDAI, p<0.001). They had shorter disease duration (p<0.001), lower prevalence of psoriasis (p = 0.008), less structural damage (mSASSS, p<0.001), and less mobility limitation (BASMI, p = 0.033). To establish whether these findings could lead to sex differences in CV disease burden, we compared the prevalence of carotid plaques in men and women with the same level of CV risk stratified according to the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE). Men included in the low-moderate CV risk SCORE category had more carotid plaques (p = 0.050), along with longer disease duration (p = 0.004), higher mSASSS (p = 0.001) and psoriasis (p = 0.023). In contrast, in the high-very high-risk SCORE category, carotid plaques were observed more frequently in women (p = 0.028), who were characterized as having worse BASFI (p = 0.011), BASDAI (p<0.001) and ASDAS (p = 0.027)., Conclusion: Disease-related features may influence the expression of atherosclerosis in patients with axSpA. This may be especially applicable to women at high CV risk, characterized by greater disease severity and more severe subclinical atherosclerosis than men, suggesting a stronger interaction between disease activity and atherosclerosis in women with axSpA., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: Multiple failures to biologic or targeted specific disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) that lead to difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) may be the result of multi-drug inefficacy or reflect treatment problems related to adverse events, comorbidities, and/or poor adherence. We aimed to characterise a cohort of D2TRA patients in clinical practice, to analyse the differences between D2TRA due to inefficacy versus D2TRA from other causes, and to compare them with non-D2TRA., Methods: The D2TRA group included patients who were receiving ≥2b/tsDMARDs due to inefficacy (D2TRA-inef cacy) or because of adverse events, poor adherence, contraindications, comorbidities, drug-intolerance, etc. (D2TRA-other). Patients who achieved low disease activity or remission with the rst bDMARD were classified as non-D2TRA patients. For all patients, demographic, clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters were assessed prior to starting the rst b/tsDMARD. Descriptive analysis was performed and bivariate logistic regression models were assembled., Results: In total, 253 patients were included: 131 non-D2TRA and 122 D2TRA [86 (70.5%) D2TRA-inefficacy and 36 (29.5%) D2TRA-other]. Comparison of the two groups of D2TRA patients: no differences in gender, age at start of b/tsDMARD or age at RA diagnosis were found; this was also true of socioeconomic status, frequency of anxiety-depression and other comorbidities. Patients categorised as D2TRA-other had less extra-articular manifestations than D2TRA-inef cacy, as well as lower values of DAS28 at the start of the rst b/tsDMARD. Comparisons of Non-D2TRA patients versus D2TRA-other resulted in the following observations: no differences in sociodemographic characteristics were evident nor were there any differences in terms of disease activity., Conclusions: Patients with D2TRA-other are indistinguishable from non-D2TRA patients at baseline, indicating the former cohort does not appear to have any predictive value during the early stages of b/tsDMARD treatment, unlike what occurs in patients with D2TRA-inefficacy.

The 2021 guidelines on the prevention of vascular disease (VD) in clinical practice published by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and supported by 13 other European scientific societies recognize the key role of screening for chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the prevention of VD. Vascular risk in CKD is categorized based on measurements of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR). Thus, moderate CKD is associated with a high vascular risk and severe CKD with a very high vascular risk requiring therapeutic action, and there is no need to apply other vascular risk scores when vascular risk is already very high due to CKD. Moreover, the ESC indicates that vascular risk assessment and the subsequent decision algorithm should start with measurement of eGFR and ACR. To optimize the implementation of the ESC 2021 guidelines on the prevention of CVD in Spain, we consider that: 1) Urine testing for albuminuria using ACR should be part of the clinical routine at the same level as blood glucose, cholesterolemia, and GFR estimation when these are used to make decisions on CVD risk. 2) Spanish public and private health services should have the necessary means and resources to optimally implement the ESC 2021 guidelines for the prevention of CVD in Spain, including ACR testing., (Copyright © 2023 Sociedad Española de Nefrología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To analyse the influence of adipokines on attaining the clinical outcomes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) treated with TNF inhibitors (TNFi), and then, to investigate the association of patients' characteristics and adipokine concentrations., Methods: This was a longitudinal study including 110 patients with axSpA who were initiated at TNFi and were followed-up for 6 months (m). Disease activity was assessed by Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at baseline and at 6 m of treatment. Clinical outcomes at 6 m of treatment were defined as remission (ASDAS <1.3) and the attainment of low disease activity (LDA; ASDAS<2.1). Leptin and adiponectin concentrations were measured in serum samples collected at baseline and after 6 m., Results: Both leptin and adiponectin were constitutively elevated in female axSpA patients. At time of TNFi initiation, leptin concentrations were higher in patients with high body mass index (overweight or obese). On the contrary, adiponectin was higher in normalweight patients. After 6 m of TNFi treatment, 24% of patients attained remission. They had significant lower leptin concentration at baseline compared with patients who did not attain remission. Furthermore, this difference remained significant after 6 m of treatment meaning that TNFi did not modify adipokine concentration. Similar results were found considering LDA as the clinical outcome, obtained in 48% of the patients., Conclusions: The present study showed that low leptin concentrations were associated with attaining clinical outcomes in axSpA patients treated with TNFi. In addition, since leptin secretion by white adipocytes is enhanced during obesity and considering that TNFi do not seem to modulate its expression, obese patients should be encouraged to decrease BMI to attain a successful therapy.

Background: Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (RMDs) substantially impact the lives of patients, with complex associations between disease severity and self-perceived health status. In this regard, the Coping with Rheumatic Stressors (CORS) questionnaire was developed to measure how patients with RMDs cope with stressors such as pain, limitations or dependency. The CORS is not currently available in Spanish, and therefore the adaptation of this instrument is needed., Objective: First, to cross-culturally adapt the CORS into Spanish for Spain. Secondly, to test the conceptual equivalence of the translated version in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA)., Methods: A translation of the CORS into Spanish was performed adhering to the forward-backward procedure described by Beaton. Two translators produced independent forward translations of the item content, response options, and instructions of the CORS into Spanish. Both versions were harmonized in a consensual version. Another translator back-translated the synthesized version into Dutch. A scientific committee including all the translators, one methodologist and a rheumatologist, held a meeting and reached consensus on discrepancies to develop a final draft version of the Spanish CORS. Then, a field test with cognitive debriefing was conducted, involving a sample of 10 patients with axSpA., Results: The translation process of the CORS was completed after the discussion of some discrepancies throughout the process. The first translation was done without major complications. Back-translation presented some discrepancies. These led to minor modifications in the wording in one response option and 15 questionnaire items. The scientific committee agreed upon a final version of the questionnaire. Cognitive debriefing, led to minor modifications; for example, three respondents indicated that one of the statements in the instructions was syntactically complex ("indique cuán a menudo usted ha llevado a cabo dicho comportamiento") which led to its adjustment. The process indicated that the final CORS Spanish questionnaire was clear and understandable to all patients., Conclusions: The Spanish version of the CORS showed good cross-cultural validity and good face validity according to the field test. Before the Spanish CORS is implemented, further validation is in progress to test the psychometric properties of the instrument in patients with axSpA., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Mobile health technology holds great promise for the clinical management of patients with chronic disease. However, evidence on the implementation of projects involving digital health solutions in rheumatology is scarce. We aimed to study the feasibility of a hybrid (virtual and face-to-face) monitoring strategy for personalized care in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA). This project included the development of a remote monitoring model and its assessment. After a focus group with patients and rheumatologists, relevant concerns regarding the management of RA and SpA were raised, leading to the development of the Mixed Attention Model (MAM), which combined hybrid (virtual and face-to-face) monitoring. Then, a prospective study using the mobile solution Adhera for Rheumatology was conducted. Over a 3-month follow-up period, patients were given the opportunity to complete disease-specific electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs) for RA and SpA with a pre-established frequency, as well as flares and changes in medication at any time. Number of interactions and alerts were assessed. The usability of the mobile solution was measured by the Net-Promoter Score (NPS) and through a 5-star Likert scale. Following the MAM development, forty-six patients were recruited to utilize the mobile solution, of whom 22 had RA and 24 SpA. There were 4,019 total interactions in the RA group, and 3,160 in the SpA group. Fifteen patients generated a total of 26 alerts, of which 24 were flares and 2 were medication-related problems; most (69%) were managed remotely. Regarding patient satisfaction, 65% of the respondents were considered to have endorsed Adhera for Rheumatology, yielding a NPS of 57 and an overall rating was 4.3 out of 5 stars. We concluded that the use of the digital health solution is feasible in clinical practice to monitor ePROs for RA and SpA. Next steps involve the implementation of this telemonitoring method in a multicentric setting., Competing Interests: Diego Benavent has received speaker fees from Jannsen, Roche, grant/research support from Novartis and Abbvie. Francisco J. Núñez-Benjumea was an employee of AdheraHealth Inc at the time this research was conducted. Luis Fernández-Luque is an employee of AdheraHealth Inc. Victoria Navarro-Compán has received speakers fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma; she has been consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma; received grant/research support from AbbVie and Novartis. María Sanz: None declared. Marta Novella-Navarro reports grants from UCB, Lilly and Janssen. Enrique Calvo-Aranda has received speaker fees from Abbvie. Leticia Lojo: None declared. Alejandro Balsa has received speaker fees from Pfizer, Abbvie, Lilly, Galapagos, BMS, Sandoz, Nordic Pharma, Gebro, Roche, Sanofi, UCB; he has been consultant of Pfizer, Abbvie, Lilly, Galapagos, BMS, Nordic Pharma, Sanofi, UCB; received grant/research support from Pfizer, Abbvie, BMS, Nordic Pharma, Gebro, Roche, UCB. Chamaida Plasencia has received speaker fees from Pfizer, Abbvie, Lilly, Sandoz, Sanofi, Biogen, Roche, Novartis; received grant/research support from Pfizer and Abbvie., (Copyright: © 2022 Benavent et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objectives: To determine the potential impact of extra-articular manifestations (EAMs) on disease characteristics and cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients with axial spondylarthritis (axSpA)., Methods: This is a cross-sectional study from the AtheSpAin cohort, a Spanish multicenter cohort to study atherosclerosis in axSpA. Data on the history of CV events, subclinical carotid atherosclerosis, and disease-related features, including EAMs, were collected., Results: 888 axSpA patients were recruited. Concomitant acute anterior uveitis (AAU), psoriasis (PSO), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were present in 177 (19.9%), 96 (10.8%), and 57 (6.4%) patients, respectively. When compared with axSpA patients without EAMs, a significant increase in past CV events was observed in patients with PSO (9% versus 4%, p = 0.048) and in those with at least one EAM (7% versus 4%, p = 0.032) or with more than one EAM (11% versus 4%, p = 0.022). The frequency of carotid plaques and the values of cIMT were higher in patients with EAMs than in those without EAMs, although only the univariable analysis for carotid plaques in patients with PSO (39% versus 30%, p = 0.038) and for cIMT in patients with AAU (665 ± 156 µm versus 637 ± 139 µm, p = 0.042) and those with at least one EAM (661 ± 155 µm versus 637 ± 139 µm, p = 0.024) showed significant results. In addition, patients with PSO or IBD were found to have specific disease-related features, such as higher ESR at diagnosis, and more frequent use of glucocorticoids and TNF inhibitors than those without EAMs. Also, PSO patients had more commonly peripheral involvement and those with AAU more severe radiographic damage than those without EAMs. The frequency of HLA B27 was higher in patients with AAU and lower in those with PSO or IBD compared to those without EAMs., Conclusion: Patients with axSpA and EAMs, in addition to displaying their own disease-related features, are likely to have an increased CV risk that appears proportional to the number of EAMs and could be related to proatherogenic factors other than traditional CV risk factors, such as the inflammatory load and the use of glucocorticoids., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite advances in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the wide range of therapies available, there is a percentage of patients whose treatment presents a challenge for clinicians due to lack of response to multiple biologic and target-specific disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs)., Objective: To develop and validate an algorithm to predict multiple failure to biological therapy in patients with RA., Design: Observational retrospective study involving subjects from a cohort of patients with RA receiving b/tsDMARDs., Methods: Based on the number of prior failures to b/tsDMARDs, patients were classified as either multi-refractory (MR) or non-refractory (NR). Patient characteristics were considered in the statistical analysis to design the predictive model, selecting those variables with a predictive capability. A decision algorithm known as 'classification and regression tree' (CART) was developed to create a prediction model of multi-drug resistance. Performance of the prediction algorithm was evaluated in an external independent cohort using area under the curve (AUC)., Results: A total of 136 patients were included: 51 MR and 85 NR. The CART model was able to predict multiple failures to b/tsDMARDs using disease activity score-28 (DAS-28) values at 6 months after the start time of the initial b/tsDMARD, as well as DAS-28 improvement in the first 6 months and baseline DAS-28. The CART model showed a capability to correctly classify 94.1% NR and 87.5% MR patients with a sensitivity = 0.88, a specificity = 0.94, and an AUC = 0.89 (95% CI: 0.74-1.00). In the external validation cohort, 35 MR and 47 NR patients were included. The AUC value for the CART model in this cohort was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73-0.9)., Conclusion: Our model correctly classified NR and MR patients based on simple measurements available in routine clinical practice, which provides the possibility to characterize and individualize patient treatments during early stages., Competing Interests: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: D.P., C.T., V.R.-E., C.A.C., and M.D.-A. have nothing to declare. M.N.-N. reports grants from UCB, Lilly and Janssen outside the submitted work. D.B. reports grants from Roche, AbbVie, and Novartis outside the submitted work. A.V. reports grants from Janssen outside the submitted work. R.S. reports grants from Abbvie, BMS, Gebro-Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Roche outside the submitted work. C.P.-R. reports grants from Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly and Roche outside the submitted work. A.B. reports grants from Abbvie, Amgen, Pfizer, Galapagos, Novartis, Gilead, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, Lilly, UCB, and Roche outside the submitted work., (© The Author(s), 2022.)

We investigated B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) in relation to response to treatment with TNF inhibitors (TNFis) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This was a longitudinal study including 158 patients with RA treated with TNFis and followed up for 6 months. Clinical response at 6 months of treatment was defined according to the EULAR criteria for good responders (GRs). BAFF concentration was measured in serum samples, collected at baseline and at 6 months. Associations with EULAR response were evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. ROC analysis was performed to determine the optimal threshold of serum BAFF concentration associated with good EULAR response to treatment. After 6 months of TNFi treatment, 24% of patients were GRs. They had a lower BMI, lower baseline DAS28 and lower baseline serum BAFF concentration than non-responders. After 6 months of TNFi treatment, autoantibody-positive patients who attained GR had significantly lower serum BAFF concentrations compared with patients who did not. Serum BAFF < 968 pg/mL at 6 months represented the concentration likely to best discriminate between GR and non-GR at 6 months of TNFi treatment. Autoantibody-seropositive patients who had serum BAFF < 968 pg/mL at 6 months demonstrated a more than four-fold increased probability to be GRs compared with patients with higher BAFF concentrations. In conclusion, serum BAFF concentrations were associated with response to TNFis in seropositive RA patients, corroborating the importance of the B-cell compartment in RA.

Objectives: To analyse the role of body mass index (BMI) in the clinical response to biologic dis-ease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To per-form an in-depth analysis of the pathophysiology of obesity by assessing serum adipokine levels and their potential changes according to treatment., Methods: This study involved 105 patients with RA starting tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or tocilizumab (TCZ). Patients were classified ac-cording to BMI as normal-weight and overweight/obesity. The clinical response to treatment was as-sessed by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) 6 months after initiation of bDMARDs. Serum adi-pokines (leptin and adiponectin) were determined using a commercial immunoassay kit in samples ob-tained before initiation of bDMARDs and after 6 months of treatment., Results: A correlation was observed between BMI and disease activity and between BMI and serum adipokines. Sixty percent of patients achieved low disease activity (LDA)/remission: 45 patients in TNFi group (64.2%) and 18 (51.4%) in TCZ group. In TNFi group, patients who did not attain LDA/remission had a higher BMI (kg/m2) ([28.7±5.1] vs. [24.5±4.6], p=0.001) and baseline CDAI (26.3 [17.4-33.9] vs. 19.8 [14.0-28.8], p<0.03). However, no differences in BMI or baseline CDAI were observed between patients who achieved LDA after 6 months in TCZ group., Conclusions: Obesity influences the extent of LDA/remission in patients treated with TNFi, but not in patients treated with TCZ, probably because of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms intrinsic to the production of proinflammatory adi-pokines. Therefore, therapeutic strategies with a mechanism of action other than TNF inhibition would be more suitable for obese patients.

Objectives: To identify disease-related factors associated with subclinical atherosclerosis and cardiovascular (CV) events in a large series of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and to identify possible differences in the effect of the potential pro-atherogenic factors between ankylosing spondylitis (AS) non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA)., Methods: This is a cross-sectional observational study of the AtheSpAin cohort, a Spanish multicenter cohort to study atherosclerosis in axSpA. Subclinical atherosclerosis determined by carotid ultrasound included assessment of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and plaque detection., Results: 639 AS and 167 nr-axSpA patients were recruited. CV risk factors (CRF) and several disease-related factors showed a statistically significant association with subclinical atherosclerosis in the crude analysis. After adjustment for age, sex, and smoking (model 1), associations remained statistically significant for spinal mobility, inflammatory bowel disease, use of prednisone, and Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) when assessing carotid plaques and for acute phase reactants (APR) at diagnosis, use of prednisone, DMARD, and TNF-inhibitors when measuring cIMT. In model 2, which also included classic CRF as confounding factors to identify axSpA features with a potential independent pro-atherogenic effect, the functional status was the only variable significantly associated with plaques and the use of prednisone and APR at diagnosis with cIMT. No association differences were found between both subtypes of patients. Besides, APR at diagnosis were also associated with subsequent development of CV events that had occurred in 33 patients., Conclusion: Apart from CRF, atherosclerotic disease in AxSpA is associated with disease-related factors such as inflammatory response and disease severity, with no differences between AS and nr-axSpA., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) have a high disease burden mainly due to the rheumatic disease itself, and also exhibit accelerated atherosclerosis, that leads to a higher incidence of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Accordingly, the identification of biomarkers of CV risk and inflammation in axSpA patients is clinically relevant. In this sense, given the beneficial functions exerted by the adipomyokine irisin in processes related to CV disease and inflammation, our aim was to assess, for the first time, the role of irisin as a genetic and serological biomarker of subclinical atherosclerosis, CV risk and disease severity in axSpA patients., Methods: A large cohort of 725 Spanish patients with axSpA was included. Subclinical atherosclerosis (presence of plaques and abnormal carotid intima-media thickness values) was evaluated by carotid ultrasound. Four irisin polymorphisms (rs16835198 G/T, rs3480 A/G, rs726344 G/A, and rs1570569 G/T) were genotyped by TaqMan probes. Additionally, serum irisin levels were determined by ELISA., Results: Low irisin levels were linked to the presence of plaques (p=0.002) and atherogenic index values ≥4 (p=0.01). Serum irisin were positively correlated with C-peptide levels (p<0.001) and negatively correlated with visual analogue scale and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (p<0.05 in all the cases). Moreover, lower irisin levels were observed in patients with sacroiliitis and in those with a negative HLA-B27 status (p<0.001 and p=0.006, respectively), as well as in those treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively). Interestingly, the TT genotype and the T allele of rs16835198 were less frequent in axSpA patients with ASDAS >2.1 (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.48 [0.28-0.83] and OR: 0.73 [0.57-0.92], respectively, p=0.01 in both cases). Additionally, the frequency of rs1570569 T allele was higher in these patients (OR: 1.46 [1.08-1.97], p=0.01). Furthermore, the GGGT haplotype was more frequent in patients with ASDAS values >2.1 (OR: 1.73 [1.13-2.66], p=0.01)., Conclusions: Our results indicate that low serum irisin levels could be indicators of the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis, high CV risk and more severe disease in axSpA patients. In addition, irisin may also constitute a genetic biomarker of disease activity in axSpA., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Remuzgo-Martínez, Rueda-Gotor, Pulito-Cueto, López-Mejías, Corrales, Lera-Gómez, Pérez-Fernández, Portilla, González-Mazón, Blanco, Expósito, Mata, Llorca, Hernández-Hernández, Rodríguez-Lozano, Barbarroja, Ortega-Castro, Vicente, Fernández-Carballido, Martínez-Vidal, Castro-Corredor, Anino-Fernández, Peiteado, Plasencia-Rodríguez, Galíndez-Agirregoikoa, García-Vivar, Vegas-Revenga, Urionaguena, Gualillo, Quevedo-Abeledo, Castañeda, Ferraz-Amaro, González-Gay and Genre.)

Aim: To evaluate the overall health and functioning in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and related factors affecting these during the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures., Methods: Data from 587 axSpA patients participating in the first phase (April-July 2020) of the REUMAVID study who completed the ASAS Health Index (ASAS-HI) were analysed. REUMAVID is a cross-sectional study that collects data through an online survey to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases across seven European countries. Poor health was defined as ASAS-HI ⩾ 12. The World Health Organization Five well-being index, self-perceived health status and change in health status during COVID-19 pandemic were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Logistic regression models were used to identify the factors associated with poor health., Results: According to the ASAS-HI, 147 (25.0%) patients reported poor health. Pain and moving around were the main affected categories. In addition, 14.0% reported their self-perceived health status as 'bad' or 'very bad' and 46.8% as worse than before the pandemic. In the multivariate analysis, smoking (OR = 1.98), diabetes (OR = 4.89) and taking painkillers (OR = 2.82) or corticosteroids use (OR = 2.20) were significantly associated with poor health, while engaging in physical activity (OR = 0.54) and being actively employed (OR = 0.48) were inversely associated with this., Conclusions: During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, one in four axSpA patients reported poor health and functioning, while the self-perceived health status of almost half of these patients worsened. Nonsmoking, physical activity and being employed were associated with better outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: DB reports honoraria/research support from AbbVie, Novartis and Roche. CP received grants/speaker/research supports from Pfizer, Sanofi, Novartis, Roche and Lilly. HM have grants and/or honoraria from Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Elli-Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. LC is an employee of Novartis Pharma AG. DW has received grant funding from AbbVie, Biogen, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis and UCB. VN-C reports honoraria/research support from AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB., (© The Author(s), 2022.)

Background: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients are known to have a higher prevalence of several comorbidities, including, among others, an increased risk of atherosclerosis, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the sum of traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors is related to disease characteristics, such as disease activity, in patients with axSpA., Methods: A cross-sectional study that encompassed 804 patients with axSpA was conducted. Patients were assessed for the presence of five traditional CV risk factors (diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity, and smoking status), and disease activity measurements. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to evaluate whether the number of classic CV risk factors was independently associated with specific features of the disease, to include disease activity., Results: A multivariable analysis showed that Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP) activity score was significantly higher in patients with 1 [beta coefficient 0.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.5), p  = 0.001] and ⩾2 [beta coefficient 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.7), p  = 0.000] CV risk factors compared with those without CV risk factors. Similarly, patients with 1 [OR 2.00 (95%CI 0.99-4.02), p  = 0.053] and ⩾2 [OR 3.39 (95%CI 1.82-6.31), p  = 0.000] CV risk factors had a higher odds ratio for the presence of high disease activity compared with the zero CV category. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) activity score was significantly associated with the number of CV risk factors, being higher in patients with more CV risk factors. These relationships showed a CV risk factor-dependent effect being beta coefficients and ORs higher for the effect of ⩾2 over 1 CV risk factor., Conclusion: Among patients with axSpA, as the number of traditional CV risk factors increased, disease activity similarly increases in an independent manner., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: MAG-G and IF-A would like to acknowledge that they received grants/research supports from Abbott, MSD, Jansen, and Roche, as well as consultation fees from company-sponsored speakers bureaus associated with Abbott, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Celgene, and MSD., (© The Author(s), 2021.)

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are widely used for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), however a considerable percentage of patients discontinued the therapy. The aim of this study is to explore real-world TNFi survival, stratified for seropositivity, and to determine the factors that may influence it. This is a retrospective, observational and longitudinal study, using real-world data of patients, who started their first TNFi therapy between 1999 and 2018 from the RA-PAZ cohort. Patients were considered seropositive if they showed positive serum levels of either RF, ACPA, or both. Treatment survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the risks of TNFi discontinuation for seronegative and seropositive patients. Of the included 250 patients, 213 (85%) were seropositive. Results showed that TNFi survival did not depend on seropositivity status. However, median survival time was significant longer for seropositive patients who received concomitant MTX compared to patients who did not receive it (median [95% CI]: 3.3 yr. [2.3-4.2] vs. 2.6 yr. [1.7-3.6], respectively; p = 0.008). Furthermore, seropositive patients who received concomitant MTX were 49% less likely to discontinue TNFi therapy than patients who did not receive it (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.35-0.74). In addition, we found that in seropositive patients, the use of prednisone throughout the TNFi treatment was associated with a higher likelihood of therapy discontinuation (OR: 2.30; 95% CI: 1.01-5.23). In conclusion, these data provide evidence to support the use of concomitant MTX in seropositive patients to prolong the effectiveness and the survival of the TNFi therapy. Moreover, the co-administration of prednisone in seropositive patients receiving TNFi was highly associated with TNFi discontinuation., Competing Interests: CP-R has received research grants/honoraria from AbbVie, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Biogen and UCB. DP-S reports speaker fees and grants from Abbvie, Grifols, Menarini, Novartis, Pfizer and Takeda during the conduct of the study. AB reports grants, consultancies and speaker fees from Abbvie, BMS, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi, Roche and UCB during the conduct of the study. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Hernández-Breijo, Brenis, Plasencia-Rodríguez, Martínez-Feito, Novella-Navarro, Pascual-Salcedo and Balsa.)

Biological therapies, such as TNF inhibitors (TNFi), are increasing remission (REM) rates in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, although these are still limited. The aim of our study was to analyze changes in the profile of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in patients with RA treated with TNFi in relation to the clinical response. This is a prospective and observational study including 78 RA patients starting the first TNFi. PBMC were analyzed by flow cytometry both at baseline and at 6 months. Disease activity at the same time points was assessed by DAS28, establishing DAS28 ≤ 2.6 as the criteria for REM. Logistic regression models were employed to analyze the association between the changes in PBMC and REM. After 6 months of TNFi treatment, 37% patients achieved REM by DAS28. Patients who achieved REM showed a reduction in the percentage of naive B cells, but only when patients had received concomitant methotrexate (MTX) (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.39-0.91). However, no association was found for patients who did not receive concomitant MTX (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.63-1.16). In conclusion, PBMC, mainly the B-cell subsets, are modified in RA patients with TNFi who achieve clinical REM. A significant decrease in naive B-cell percentage is associated with achieving REM after 6 months of TNFi treatment in patients who received concomitant therapy with MTX., Competing Interests: CP-R has received research grants/honoraria from AbbVie, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Biogen and UCB. VN-C reports speaker fees and grants from Abbvie, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB during the conduct of the study. AB reports grants, consultancies and speaker fees from Abbvie, BMS, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi, Roche and UCB during the conduct of the study. DP-S reports speaker fees and grants from Abbvie, Grifols, Menarini, Novartis, Pfizer and Takeda during the conduct of the study. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Hernández-Breijo, Plasencia-Rodríguez, Navarro-Compán, García-Hoz, Nieto-Gañán, Sobrino, Bachiller-Corral, Díaz-Almirón, Martínez-Feito, Jurado, Lapuente-Suanzes, Bonilla, Pijoán-Moratalla, Roy, Vázquez-Díaz, Balsa, Villar, Pascual-Salcedo and Rodríguez-Martín.)

Currently, there is an increasing interest in treating patients at risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to prevent the development of this chronic disease. In this sense, research has focused attention on the early identification of predictive factors of this disease. Autoantibodies and markers of systemic inflammation can be present before clinical arthritis and RA development. So, the phase of inflammatory arthralgia preceding clinical arthritis is an important part of the window of opportunity and, starting treatment might prevent progression to chronic arthritis. Additionally, the early diagnosis and treatment initiation, in patients with inflammatory arthritis at risk of persistence and/or erosive progression, are fundamental because may allow optimal clinical responses, better chances of achieving sustained remission, preventing irreversible organ damage and optimizing long-term outcomes. This review aims to give an overview of clinical risk factors for developing RA, both in suspected arthralgia and in undifferentiated arthritis. Besides taking into consideration the role of serological markers (immunological and acute phase reactants) and clinical features assessed at consultation such as: articular affection and patient's clinical perception. Other features as sociodemographic and environmental factors (lifestyle habits, microbiota, periodontal disease among others), have been included in this revision to give an insight on strategies to prevent development of RA and/or to treat it in early stages., Competing Interests: AB received grant/research support from Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, UCB, Roche. Worked as a paid consultant for Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, Lilly. Has been paid as a speaker for Pfizer, Novartis, UCB, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, Lilly. CP-R has received research grants/honoraria from AbbVie, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Biogen, and UCB. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Novella-Navarro, Plasencia-Rodríguez, Nuño and Balsa.)

Immunogenicity related to treatment with TNF inhibitors (TNFi) is one of the causes for the decreased attainment of clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The B-cell activating factor (BAFF) may be playing a role in the development of immunogenicity. The objective of this study was to analyse the association of baseline concentration of serum B-cell activating factor (BAFF) with immunogenicity after 6 months of TNFi treatment. A total of 127 patients with RA starting a TNFi (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol or golimumab) were followed-up for 6 months. Serum samples were obtained at baseline and at 6 months and anti-drug antibody (ADA) and BAFF concentrations were measured. Logistic regression models were employed in order to analyse the association between BAFF concentrations and immunogenicity. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the BAFF concentrations with a greater likelihood of showing immunogenicity association. At 6 months, 31 patients (24%) developed ADA. A significant interaction between the age and baseline BAFF concentration was found for the development of ADA (Wald chi-square value = 5.30; p = 0.02); therefore, subsequent results were stratified according to mean age (≤ / > 55 years). Baseline serum BAFF concentration was independently associated with ADA development only in patients over 55 years (OR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.03-2.21). Baseline serum BAFF ≥ 1034 pg/mL predicted the presence of ADA at 6 months (AUC = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.93; p = 0.001; positive likelihood ratio = 3.7). In conclusion, our results suggest that the association of BAFF concentration and immunogenicity depends on the patient's age. Baseline serum BAFF concentration predicts the presence of ADA within 6 months of TNFi therapy in older patients with RA.

Background: Vaspin is a novel anti-inflammatory adipokine associated with cardiovascular (CV) disease and inflammation in chronic inflammatory conditions different from axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Given the high incidence of CV disease (mainly due to accelerated atherosclerosis) exhibited by axSpA patients, we wondered if vaspin could also be a key molecule in this process. However, data on the role of vaspin regarding atherosclerotic disease in the context of axSpA is scarce. For this reason, we aimed to evaluate the implication of vaspin, at the genetic and serological level, in subclinical atherosclerosis and CV risk in axSpA., Methods: This study included 510 patients diagnosed with axSpA. Carotid ultrasound (US) was performed to evaluate the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis. Three vaspin gene variants (rs2236242, rs7159023, and rs35262691) were genotyped by TaqMan probes. Serum vaspin levels were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA® v.11.1., Results: Serum vaspin levels were significantly higher in female patients than in males and also in obese patients when compared to those with normal weight (p < 0.05). At the genetic level, we disclosed that the minor allele of rs2236242 (A) was associated with lower serum vaspin levels in axSpA, while the rs7159023 minor allele (A) was linked to higher serum levels (p < 0.05). When the three polymorphisms assessed were combined conforming haplotypes, we disclosed that the TGC haplotype related to high serum levels of vaspin (p = 0.01). However, no statistically significant association was observed between vaspin and markers of subclinical atherosclerosis, both at the genetic and serological level., Conclusions: Our results revealed that vaspin is linked to CV risk factors that may influence on the atherosclerotic process in axSpA. Additionally, we disclosed that serum vaspin concentration is genetically modulated in a large cohort of patients with axSpA.

Objectives: To compare the atherosclerosis disease burden between ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic (nr) axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and establish a model that allows to identify high-cardiovascular (CV) risk in axial spondyloarthritis patients., Methods: Cross-sectional study from the AtheSpAin cohort, a Spanish multicenter cohort aimed to study atherosclerosis in axSpA. Carotid ultrasound (US) was performed to determine the carotid intima-media wall thickness (cIMT) and detect the presence of carotid plaques. The European cardiovascular disease risk assessment model, the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), was also applied., Results: A set of 639 patients with AS and 167 patients with nr-axSpA without history of CV events were recruited. AS patients were older showing more CV risk factors and higher values of C reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) than those with nr-axSpA. However, no difference in the prevalence of carotid plaques or in the cIMT was found between both groups in the adjusted analysis. The percentage of patients reclassified from the low and moderate CV risk categories to the very high-risk category due to the presence of carotid plaques was comparable in AS and nr-axSpA (10.7% versus 10.1% and 40.5% versus 45.5%, respectively). A model containing age, BASFI and ESR applied to moderate risk axSpA patients identified 41% of these patients as having very high-risk patients with high specificity (88%)., Conclusion: The atherosclerosis burden is similar in nr-axSpA and AS. As occurred for AS, more than 40% of axSpA patients included in the category of moderate CV risk according to the SCORE are reclassified into very high risk after carotid US, and a clinically relevant proportion of them can be detected by applying a model containing age, BASFI and ESR., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest I am pleased to inform that the authors of this manuscript have no competing interests to declare, (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: First, to compare clinical features and biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) response in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA). Second, to identify possible predictors of treatment response in both entities., Methods: One-year follow-up, observational, single-center study including all patients with axSpA or axPsA who started bDMARDs therapy. Clinical features were collected at baseline while disease activity was measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months by the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score and the Physician Global Assessment. The frequency of patients achieving inactive disease (ID), low disease activity (LDA), high or very high disease activity and clinical improvement were compared between axSpA and axPsA. Baseline predictor factors for achieving treatment response were identified through regression models, using odds ratio (OR) as an estimate., Results: In total, 352 patients were included: 287 (81.5%) axSpA and 65 (18.5%) axPsA. No significant differences at baseline were observed between the two diseases for most of the characteristics. While HLA-B27 positivity was associated with axSpA (OR = 5.4; p  < 0.001), peripheral manifestations were associated with axPsA (OR = 4.7; p  < 0.001). The frequency of patients with axSpA and axPsA achieving ID/LDA after 6 and 12 months of bDMARDs was comparable: 53% versus 58%, p  = 0.5; and 58% versus 60%, p  = 0.9, respectively. Both diseases also presented similar clinical improvement. In axSpA and axPsA, male gender seemed to be associated with achieving LDA [OR at 12 months visit = 2.8 ( p  < 0.01) and 2.7 ( p  = 0.09)]., Conclusion: In clinical practice, patients with axSpA and axPsA present numerous similarities, including comparable medium-term clinical response to bDMARDs. Male gender could be a predictor of treatment response in both diseases.Keyword: axial spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial involvement, clinical characteristics., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: DB received grants/speaker/research supports from Roche and Abbvie. CP received grants/speaker/research supports from Pfizer, Sanofi, Novartis, Roche and Lilly. RN received grants/speaker/research supports from Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Pfizer and Montpellier. IM received grants/research supports from Novartis and speaker’s fees from AbbVie, UCB, Roche and Novartis. DP received grants/research supports from Abbvie, Lilly, MSD and Roche, and had participation in company sponsored speaker’s bureau from Abbvie, Novartis, Lilly, Roche, and MSD. AB received grant/research support, fees for consultancies or as a speaker for Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, Lilly, UCB, Roche. VN: consultancy/speaker/research grants from: Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB., (© The Author(s), 2020.)

Biosimilars are replacing originator compounds due to their similar effectiveness, safety and pharmacokinetics. Our objective was to compare the differences in pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes between the originator infliximab (Ifx) and the biosimilar CT-P13 in a patient cohort with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our cohort study included 86 patients from a historical and a prospective cohort from the start of infliximab treatment to 22 weeks later. Serum infliximab, antidrug antibody levels and other serum biomarkers were measured at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22. Remission outcomes were evaluated at weeks 14 and 22. Drug levels were measured prospectively and analysed using MANOVA. Of the 86 patients, 44 (51%) and 42 (49%) were administered the originator and CT-P13, respectively. Originator trough levels were higher than the biosimilar trough levels (35 vs. 21, 20.1 vs. 11, 6.6 vs. 2.9 and 4.3 vs. 1.7 μg/mL at weeks 2, 6, 14 and 22, respectively). A post-hoc analysis demonstrated changes in mean serum drug levels over time (p < 0.001) and according to the drug employed (p = 0.001). At week 22, 13 (81%) patients administered the originator achieved clinical remission compared with 5 (19%) patients with the biosimilar (p = 0.02). None of the patients administered the originator withdrew from the treatment compared with 7 for the biosimilar. During the study, there were significant differences in serum infliximab levels between the originator and the CT-P13 in the patients with IBD. The clinical outcomes were influenced by the type of compound administered.

Background: TNF inhibitors (TNFis) are widely used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), although the response rates to this therapy in patients with RA remains heterogeneous and < 50% achieve remission (REM). Objective: To analyze baseline peripheral blood leukocytes profiles in order to search for biomarkers identifying patients who will most likely not achieve REM under TNFi treatment. Methods: A prospective bi-center pilot study including 98 RA patients treated with TNFis and followed-up during 6 months. Patients were classified according to DAS28 as follows: those who achieved REM (DAS28 ≤ 2.6) and those who did not (DAS28 > 2.6) at 6 months after starting TNFis. These rates were also assessed by simplified disease activity index (SDAI ≤ 3.3 and SDAI > 3.3, respectively). Peripheral blood immune cells were studied by flow cytometry before treatment initiation. Results: At 6 months, 61 or 80% of patients did not achieve REM by DAS28 or SDAI, respectively. Basal leukocyte profiles differed between REM vs. non-REM patients. Non-REM patients showed lower percentages of total and naïve B cells at baseline than REM subjects. A B lymphocyte/CD4+ lymphocyte ratio (BL/CD4 ratio) <0.2 clearly associated with a higher probability of non-REM status based on DAS28 at 6 months (OR = 9.2, p = 0.006). These data were confirmed when patient response was evaluated by SDAI index. Conclusion: Our results strongly suggest that BL/CD4 ratio could be considered as a useful biomarker for the early identification of non-remitters to TNFi in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2020 Rodríguez-Martín, Nieto-Gañán, Hernández-Breijo, Sobrino, García-Hoz, Bachiller, Martínez-Feito, Navarro-Compán, Lapuente-Suanzes, Bonilla, Pascual-Salcedo, Roy, Jurado, Nozal, Vázquez-Díaz, Balsa, Villar and Plasencia-Rodríguez.)

To investigate the effect of concomitant conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) with adalimumab or infliximab on maintaining serum drug and clinical outcomes after the first year of treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Second, to assess the influence of methotrexate (MTX) dose on these outcomes. Ninety-two patients with RA starting infliximab (n = 67) or adalimumab (n = 25) tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) with available drug levels and clinical improvement assessment (European League Against Rheumatism [EULAR] response) after 12 months were included. Patients were grouped according to concomitant csDMARD use: (i) TNFi monotherapy; (ii) TNFi+MTX; (iii) TNFi with csDMARDs other than MTX (TNFi+OD). Patients receiving MTX were also classified by dose as < 15 mg/week (TNFi+MTX<15) and ≥ 15 mg/week (TNFi+MTX≥15). Logistic regression analyses were employed. More TNFi+MTX patients had circulating serum TNFi at 12 months (71% TNFi+MTX vs. 20% TNFi+OD vs. 9% TNFi monotherapy). Of these, the probability of maintaining serum TNFi levels was twice (OR 2.3; p = 0.06) than that of patients without MTX. However, statistically significant results were observed only for the highest MTX dose (OR 4.9; p = 0.02). Most patients achieving good EULAR response were treated with TNFi+MTX (81%). The probability of achieving this response was three times higher in patients within the TNFi+MTX group (OR 3.4; p = 0.03); however, no differences were found with regard to MTX dose. The persistence of serum TNFi and the probability of achieving clinical response are influenced by MTX but not by OD in patients with RA treated with infliximab or adalimumab.

Background: The aim of our study was to investigate the influence of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and body mass index (BMI) on circulating drug levels and clinical response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapy in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients., Methods: Prospective observational study during 1 year with 2 cohorts (Madrid and Amsterdam) including 180 axSpA patients treated with standard doses of infliximab or adalimumab. Patients were stratified by BMI, being 78 (43%) normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ) and 102 (57%) overweight/obese (≥ 25.0 kg/m 2 ). After the first year of treatment, TNFi trough levels were measured by capture ELISA. Clinical response to TNFi was defined as ∆BASDAI ≥ 2 and clinical remission as BASDAI < 2 and CRP ≤ 5 mg/L. Logistic regression models were employed to analyse the association between concomitant csDMARDs and BMI with drug levels and clinical response., Results: Seventy-nine patients (44%) received concomitant csDMARDs. The administration of concomitant csDMARDs (OR 3.82; 95% CI 1.06-13.84) and being normal weight (OR 18.38; 95% CI 2.24-150.63) were independently associated with serum TNFi drug persistence. Additionally, the use of concomitant csDMARDs contributed positively to achieve clinical response (OR 7.86; 95% CI 2.39-25.78) and remission (OR 4.84; 95% CI 1.09-21.36) in overweight/obese patients, but no association was found for normal-weight patients (OR 1.10; 0.33-3.58)., Conclusions: The use of concomitant csDMARDs with TNFi may increase the probability of achieving clinical response in overweight/obese axSpA patients. Further research studies including larger cohorts of patients need to be done to confirm it.

Objective: The main purpose of this recommendation statement is to provide clinicians with the best available evidence and the best opinion agreed upon by the panelists for a rational use of synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologicals in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. The present document also focuses on important aspects in the management of PsA, such as early diagnosis, therapeutic objectives, comorbidities and optimization of treatment., Methods: The recommendations were agreed by consensus by a panel of 8 expert rheumatologists, previously selected by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) through an open call. The phases of the work were: identification of key areas for updating the previous consensus, analysis and synthesis of scientific evidence (modified Oxford system, Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, 2009) and formulation of recommendations based on this evidence and by consensus techniques., Results: Seventeen recommendations were issued for the treatment of PsA patients. Six of them were of general nature, ranging from the early diagnosis and treatment to the importance of assessing comorbidities. The other 11 were focused on the indications for DMARDs and biological therapy in the distinct clinical forms of the disease. Likewise, the situation of failure of the first biological is addressed and treatment algorithms and a table with the different biological therapies are also included., Conclusions: We present the update of SER recommendations for the treatment of PsA with DMARDs and biologics., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Reumatología y Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: First, to investigate if switching biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) after the failure to prior bDMARD is efficacious in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Second, to evaluate the influence on this efficacy of (1) the reason to discontinue prior tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), (2) changing the type of TNFi and (3) changing the target., Methods: A systematic literature review until January 2017 was performed using Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Longitudinal studies assessing clinical response after switching bDMARDs in patients with axSpA were analysed., Results: In total, 9 studies out of 1862 retrieved citations were included. Overall, the level of evidence was poor. In these studies, all patients received a TNFi as first bDMARD, 1956 patients switched to a second bDMARD (97% TNFi and 3% interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i)) and 170 to a third bDMARD (all TNFi). Clinical response (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50) after a second TNFi was achieved by 25%-56% of patients compared with 50%-72% after the first TNFi. Also, 47% of patients switching to IL-17i after a TNFi responded (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40) compared with 66% in those who received IL-17i as first line. The response after switching was not influenced by the reason to discontinue, type of prior TNFi or changing the target., Conclusions: In patients with axSpA, switching to a second bDMARD (a TNFi or IL-17i) after prior TNFi is efficacious. Nevertheless, the clinical response is lower than the observed in patients naive to bDMARD. So far, the reason to discontinue prior bDMARD or the type of bDMARD has not been identified as predictor of response. Published evidence for switching to a third bDMARD is lacking., Competing Interests: Competing interests: VN-C has received speaking fees or funding for research projects and attending congresses from AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB. AB is a consultant for, participated in clinical trials for, member of a speaker bureau for, received research grants from Abbvie, Boehringer, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, MSD and Roche. CPR has received grants from Pfizer. EDM has been a consultant for, participated in clinical trials for, member of a speaker bureau for and received research grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Janssen, Hospira, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UCB. JG is a consultant for, participated in clinical trials for, member of a speaker bureau for, received research grants from AbbVie, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Janssen. The other author has declared no conflicts of interest.

Our objective was to study the frequency of circulating CD19+CD24hiCD38hi B cells (Breg) in AS patients. To this end, peripheral blood was drawn from AS patients naïve for TNF blockers (AS/nb) (n = 42) and healthy controls (HC) (n = 42). Six patients donated blood for a second time, 6 months after initiating treatment with anti-TNFα drugs. After isolation by Ficoll-Hypaque, PBMCs were stained with antibodies to CD3, CD4, CD19, CD24, and CD38, and examined by cytometry. For functional studies, total CD19+ B cells were isolated from PBMCs of 3 HC by magnetical sorting. Breg-depleted CD19+ B cells were obtained after CD19+CD24hiCD38hi B cells were removed from total CD19+ cells by cytometry. Total CD19+ B cells or Breg-depleted CD19+ B cells were established in culture and stimulated through their BCR. Secretion of IFNγ was determined by ELISA in culture supernatants. When compared with HC, AS/nb patients demonstrated a significantly increased frequency of Breg cells, which was independent of disease activity. Anti-TNFα drugs induced a significant reduction of circulating Breg numbers, which were no longer elevated after six months of treatment. Functional in vitro studies showed that the secretion of IFNγ was significantly higher in Breg-depleted as compared with total CD19+ B cells, indicating that Breg can downmodulate B cell pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion. In summary, an increased frequency of circulating CD19+CD24hiCD38hi B cells is observed in AS/nb patients, that is not related with disease activity; anti-TNFα drugs are able to downmodulate circulating Breg numbers in AS.