Search

Aim Methodology Results Conclusion To assess the occurrence of external cervical resorption (ECR) in relation to patient characteristics and potential predisposing factors.In total, 215 ECR lesions (194 patients) referred to the Endodontic postgraduate Unit at King's College London or Specialist Endodontic practice (London, UK) between September 2017 and January 2022. The clinical records were readily accessible for evaluation. At the time of initial presentation, patients diagnosed with ECR were interviewed regarding potential predisposing factors using a checklist based on existing literature of reported predisposing factors. Absolute and relative frequencies for all variables were computed. Inferential analysis was carried out to determine if there was any potential association between the type and location of tooth in the jaw as well as sex, age of the patient and potential predisposing factors.No identifiable predisposing factor were detected in 22.3% (48/215 teeth) of the cases, 57.7% (124/215 teeth) had a sole, identifiable predisposing factor and 20% (43/215 teeth) had combined (several) factors. The most common (sole or combined) potential predisposing factors were previous/existing history of orthodontic treatment (25.6%, 55/215 teeth), dental trauma injury (DTI) (20.9%, 45/215 teeth), domestic cat ownership (15.8%, 34/215 teeth) and parafunctional habits (10.2%, 22/215 teeth). The highest occurrence of sole predisposing factors was recorded for males (62%, 75/121 teeth), all other ethnic groups combined (non‐white) patients (58.5%, 24/41 teeth), incisor teeth (64.4%, 56/87 teeth) and maxillary teeth (62.4%, 68/109 teeth). While the highest occurrence of combined predisposing factors was found in females (22.3%, 21/94 teeth), white patients (20.1%, 35/174 teeth), premolars (29%, 9/31 teeth) and mandibular teeth (21.7%, 23/106 teeth). There were significant associations between tooth type and trauma (p < .001), cat ownership (p = .003) and parafunctional habits (p = .017). The association between trauma (p < .001), cat ownership (p = .002) and jaw location were found to be significant. Concerning parafunctional habits, female patients had significantly (p = .015) more ECR occurrence than male patients.Most cases had 1 (sole) identified predisposing factor; orthodontic treatment, dental trauma history and (previous) cat ownership were the most identified factors. The information may be helpful in diagnosing early stage ECR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Studies investigating the accuracy of diagnostic tests should provide data on how effectively they identify or exclude disease in order to inform clinicians responsible for managing patients. This consensus‐based project was undertaken to develop reporting guidelines for authors submitting manuscripts, which describe studies that have evaluated the accuracy of diagnostic tests in endodontics. These guidelines are known as the Preferred Reporting Items for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Endodontics (PRIDASE) 2024 guidelines. A nine‐member steering committee created an initial checklist by integrating and modifying items from the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 checklist and the Clinical and Laboratory Images in Publications (CLIP) principles, as well as adding a number of new items specific to the specialty of endodontics. Thereafter, the steering committee formed the PRIDASE Delphi Group (PDG) and the PRIDASE Online Meeting Group (POMG) in order to collect expert feedback on the preliminary draft checklist. Members of the Delphi group engaged in an online Delphi process to reach consensus on the clarity and suitability of the items in the checklist. The online meeting group then held an in‐depth discussion on the online Delphi‐generated items via the Zoom platform on 20 October 2023. According to the feedback obtained, the steering committee revised the PRIDASE checklist, which was then piloted by several authors when preparing manuscripts describing diagnostic accuracy studies in endodontics. Feedback from this process resulted in the final version of the PRIDASE 2024 checklist, which has 11 sections and 66 items. Authors are encouraged to use the PRIDASE 2024 guidelines when developing manuscripts on diagnostic accuracy in endodontics in order to improve the quality of reporting in this area. Editors of relevant journals will be invited to include these guidelines in their instructions to authors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To assess the association between demographic and clinical variables and the outcome of root-end surgery using digital periapical radiographs (PA) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methodology: One hundred and fifty teeth that received endodontic microsurgery were clinically and radiographically examined (PA and CBCT scans) after 1 and 2 years. Two calibrated endodontists evaluated the radiographic healing based on a six-point outcome classification. The outcome was classified using both strict (healed) and loose (healing) criteria. The success rates were calculated, and several outcome prognostic factors were assessed. Results: One hundred and fifty teeth were assessed with both radiographic systems. When "loose" success criteria were applied using PA, 90% (n = 135) of teeth were assessed as having had a favourable outcome (90%; 95% CI: 85.2–94.8%), whereas 90.7% (n = 136) of teeth showed a successful outcome when assessed with CBCT (90.7%; 95% CI: 86.0–95.3%). When "strict" success criteria were applied, there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.018) between the success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) (63.7%) and Biodentine (95.5%). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, endodontic microsurgery showed a high success rate. Among all the demographic and clinical variables assessed, in the multiregression analysis, only the use of Biodentine was associated with a higher proportion of "complete" healings compared to MTA or Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM) when assessed using CBCT. MTA and Biodentine performed similarly when "incomplete" healings were regarded as successful outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To determine the prevalence of symptoms, clinical signs and radiographic presentation of external cervical resorption (ECR). Methodology: This study involved 215 ECR lesions in 194 patients referred to the Endodontic postgraduate Unit at King's College London or Specialist Endodontic practice (London, UK). The clinical and radiographic findings (periapical [PA] and cone beam computed tomography [CBCT]) were readily accessible for evaluation. A checklist was used for data collection. Inferential analysis was carried out to determine if there was any potential association between type and location of tooth in the jaw as well as sex, age of the patient and ECR presentation and radiographic feature. Results: Eighty‐eight patients (94 teeth) were female and 106 patients were male (121 teeth), the mean age (±SD) was 41.5 (±17.7) years. Fifteen patients (7.7%) had more than one ECR lesion. The most affected teeth were maxillary central incisors (21.4% [46 teeth]) and mandibular first molars (10.2% [22 teeth]). ECR was most commonly detected as an incidental radiographic finding in 58.1% [125 teeth] of the cases. ECR presented with symptoms of pulpal/periapical disease in 23.3% [n = 50] and clinical signs (e.g. pink spot, cavitation) in 16.7% [36 teeth] of the cases. Clinical signs such as cavitation (14%), pink spot (5.1%) and discolouration (2.8%) were uncommon, but their incidence increased up to 24.7% when combined with other clinical findings. ECR was detected in the resorptive and reparative phases in 70.2% and 29.8% of the cases respectively. Conclusion: ECR appears to be quiescent in nature, the majority being asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally from PA or CBCT. When assessed with the Patel classification, most lesions were minimal to moderate in relation to their height (1 or 2) and circumferential spread (A or B). However, the majority of ECRs were in (close) proximity to the pulp. Symptoms and clinical signs were associated with (probable) pulp involvement rather than the height and circumferential spread of the lesion. Clinical signs were more frequently associated when ECR affected multiple surfaces. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Apical periodontitis (AP) is a chronic inflammatory response of microbial aetiology. Pathological changes associated with AP may not be visible on radiographic images and may linger without causing any symptoms. Clinicians rely mostly on clinical examination and imaging techniques to establish a diagnosis. Objectives: The aim of this review was to answer the following question using the PICO format: In the adult human permanent dentition (P), what is the efficacy of diagnostic imaging of the periapical tissues (I) using histopathology as a reference standard (C) in the diagnosis of apical periodontitis, in terms of diagnostic accuracy (O). Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched for English articles published through October 2021. At least two independent reviewers evaluated the study design, imaging modality used, histopathological assessment, outcome measures, results and conclusions for each article. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2. Results: The initial search strategy identified 544 articles. Seven articles were included for analysis in the final review, all of which involved tissue samples obtained from cadavers. No clinical studies were identified that met the eligibility criteria. A consistently low sensitivity score and negative predictive value were reported for periapical radiography, especially in comparison to CBCT, which scored highly. Both modalities achieved high scores for specificity and positive predictive value. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT was lower for root‐filled teeth in comparison to non‐root‐filled teeth. Discussion: Assessment of the periapical tissues using periapical radiographs was shown to have a low to moderate agreement with the histopathological assessment. CBCT was reported to be more accurate than PR and demonstrated a good agreement with histopathology, especially for non‐root‐filled teeth. Conclusions: This review identified a need for greater standardization in methodology and reporting, and as the findings are based on cadaver studies, their clinical relevance must be interpreted with caution. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021272147). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intravenous (IV) sedation with midazolam works as an anxiolytic and muscle relaxant agent and has proved successful in providing safe root canal treatment (RCT) for patients with dental anxiety or special care needs. However, before starting RCT under IV sedation with midazolam, clinicians should consider obtaining a thorough medical history and written, informed consent including any significant or unavoidable risks. A responsible adult escort should also accompany the patient to their appointment. The dental team should also ensure labelling the IV sedation drugs and irrigant solutions, and using a well-sealed rubber dam. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This Position Statement on root resorption represents the consensus of an expert committee convened by the European Society of Endodontology (ESE). The statement is based on current clinical and scientific evidence as well as the expertise of the committee. The aim is to provide clinicians with authoritative information on the aetiology, histopathology, clinical presentation and recommendations for the management of root resorption. It is the intention of the committee to update this position statement at appropriate intervals as further evidence emerges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Root resorption is the loss of dental hard tissue because of odontoclastic action. In permanent teeth, it is undesirable and pathological in nature. Root resorption may occur on the inner aspect of the root canal (internal root resorption) or on the outer aspect of the root (external root resorption). Regardless of its location, root resorption is irreversible, and may result in discomfort for the patient, requires management and/or, in some cases, results in the premature loss of the affected tooth. Root resorption is often challenging to accurately diagnose and manage. The aim of this narrative review is to present the relevant literature on the aetiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and management, as well as discuss the future directions of diagnosis and management of root resorption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vertical root fracture (VRF) is a common reason for the extraction of root filled teeth. The accurate diagnosis of VRF may be challenging due to the absence of clinical signs, whilst conventional radiographic assessment is often inconclusive. However, an understanding of the aetiology of VRFs, and more importantly, the key predisposing factors, is crucial in identifying teeth that may be susceptible. Thorough clinical examination with magnification and co‐axial lighting is essential in identifying VRFs, and although CBCT is unable to reliably detect VRFs per se, the pattern of bone loss typically associated with VRF can be fully appreciated, and therefore, increases the probability of correct diagnosis and management. The prevalence of VRFs in root filled teeth is significantly greater than in teeth with vital pulps, demonstrating that the combination of loss of structural integrity, presence of pre‐existing fractures and biochemical effects of loss of vitality is highly relevant. Careful assessment of the occlusal scheme, presence of deflective contacts and identification of parafunctional habits are imperative in both preventing and managing VRFs. Furthermore, anatomical factors such as root canal morphology may predispose certain teeth to VRF. The influence of access cavity design and root canal instrumentation protocols should be considered although the impact of these on the fracture resistance of root filled teeth is not clearly validated. The post‐endodontic restoration of root filled teeth should be expedient and considerate to the residual tooth structure. Posts should be placed 'passively' and excessive 'post‐space' preparation should be avoided. This narrative review aims to present the aetiology, potential predisposing factors, histopathology, diagnosis and management of VRF and present perspectives for future research. Currently, there are limited options other than extraction for the management of VRF, although root resection may be considered in multi‐rooted teeth. Innovative techniques to 'repair' VRFs using both orthograde and surgical approaches require further research and validation. The prevention of VRFs is critical; identifying susceptible teeth, utilizing conservative endodontic procedures, together with expedient and appropriate post‐endodontic restorative procedures is paramount to reducing the incidence of terminal VRFs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate the effect of an enhanced infection control protocol on root canal treatment outcomes and on microbial load within root canals after chemomechanical preparation. Methodology: A total of 144 molar teeth from 139 healthy patients receiving primary root canal treatment were block randomized to a standard protocol (StP) or an enhanced infection control protocol (EnP). Both treatment arms adhered to current best practice recommendations, while the EnP comprised additional steps that included replacing rubber dams, gloves, files, all instruments and surface barriers at the time of canal filling to reduce the chances of iatrogenic contamination. Patients and radiographic examiners were blinded to the protocol used. Intracanal microbial samples were taken at baseline (S1) and after completion of chemomechanical preparation (S2). Microbial 16S rDNA copy numbers were enumerated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken before treatment and at one‐year follow‐up. The outcome was assessed clinically and radiographically using CBCT by logistic regression modelling. Results: At one‐year follow‐up, 115 teeth were analysed (54 in StP and 61 in EnP). The percentage of favourable outcomes assessed by CBCT was 85.2% in the EnP and 66.7% in the StP. The odds of 12‐month success was three times higher in the EnP group compared with the StP group (OR=2.89; p=0.022, CI: 1.17 – 7.15). The median bacterial reads were reduced from 8.1×103 in S1 samples to 3.5×103 in the StP group and from 8.6×103 to 1.3×103 in the EnP group. The enhanced protocol significantly reduced bacterial counts in pre‐canal filling samples when compared to the standard protocol (p=0.009). Conclusions: The implementation of a facile, enhanced infection control protocol in primary root canal treatment resulted in less detectable bacterial DNA before canal filling and significantly more successful outcomes at one year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study was performed to assess the accuracy of preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), when justified for other reasons, in locating the apical foramen and establishing the working length. Materials and Methods: Six electronic databases were searched for studies on this subject. All studies, of any type, were included if they compared measurements of working length with preoperative CBCT to measurements using an electronic apex locator (EAL) or histological reference standard. Due to the high levels of heterogeneity, an inverse-variance random-effects model was chosen, and weighted mean differences were obtained with 95% confidence intervals and P values. Results: Nine studies were included. Compared to a histological reference standard, CBCT indicated that the apical foramen was on average 0.40 mm coronal of its histological position, with a mean absolute difference of 0.48 mm. Comparisons were also performed to an EAL reference standard, but the conclusions could not be considered robust due to high levels of heterogeneity in the results. Conclusion: A low level of evidence is produced suggesting that preoperative CBCT shows the apical foramen to be on average 0.40 mm coronal to its histological position, with a mean absolute difference of 0.48 mm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Good practice guidelines recommend the use of rubber dam for all nonsurgical endodontic procedures; there are also safety and medico-legal implications. However, many unfounded reasons have been cited for not using rubber dam. By explaining why it is essential when performing endodontic treatment, and describing the various techniques of placement, the hope is that it will encourage the routine use of rubber dam in everyday clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An introduction is presented in which the guest editors discuss the theme of the issue, Preferred Reporting Items for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in ​Endodontics (PRIDASE).

This case describes a novel indirect pulp capping approach to managing gross caries in a healthy tooth. CPD/Clinical Relevance: The importance of a thorough clinical examination, including a CBCT scan, is explained. The rationale for single visit use of Biodentine is described. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]