Search

Background/Objectives : Although increased nociceptive excitability and deficient endogenous pain modulation are considered key features of pronociception and central sensitization, their contribution to neuropathic pain (NP) characteristics in SCI is unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize tonic cold perception and endogenous pain modulation in individuals with and without SCI-NP, considering the stage and severity of SCI and, secondarily, NP phenotype. Methods : Temporal summation of pain (TSP) and neuropathic features were assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) and Douleur Neuropathique 4 screening questionnaire (DN4) during the tonic cold pressor test (CPT, 12 °C 60 s) applied to the dominant hand and foot. CPT-induced pronociception was assessed as change in algometer pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) measured at the V2, C6, and L4 dermatomes. Results : A total of 72 individuals were recruited (age-sex-matched noninjured, n = 24; SCI-NP, n = 24; SCI-noNP, n = 24 [AIS A: n = 12, AIS B-D: n = 12; subacute SCI: n = 12, chronic SCI: n = 12]). TSP in response to the foot CPT was higher in subacute compared to chronic incomplete SCI-NP, while TSP to the hand CPT was significantly higher in chronic compared to the subacute complete SCI-NP group. Evoked pain intensity during the hand CPT correlated with duration of below-level SCI-NP. The hand CPT induced widespread pronociception (lower PPT), which correlated with 7-day non-evoked (spontaneous) pain intensity in individuals with incomplete SCI-NP. Individuals with below-level NP, but not at-level NP, showed higher TSP during the foot CPT and greater hand CPT-induced L4 dermatome pronociception. Conclusions : Collectively, measurements of above and below-level temporal summation of pain and translesional-induced pronociception in the SCI-NP group highlight the role of these mechanisms in widespread central sensitization, spontaneous pain intensity, and spinothalamic tract hyperexcitability, especially in individuals diagnosed with below-level NP.

Study Design: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group multicentric phase IIA clinical trial., Objective: To assess the safety and tolerability of oral administration of NFX-88 in subjects with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and explore its efficacy in pain control., Setting: A total of 7 spinal cord injury rehabilitation units in Spain., Methods: A total of 61 adult with traumatic complete or incomplete spinal cord injury (C4-T12 level), were randomised 1:1:1:1 to a placebo, NFX88 1.05 g, 2.1 g, 4.2 g/day for up to 12 weeks. The placebo or NFX-88 was administered as add-on therapy to pre-existing pregabalin (150-300 mg per day). Safety and tolerability were evaluated, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was the primary measure to explore the efficacy of NFX-88 in pain control., Results: No severe treatment-related adverse effects were reported for any of the four study groups. 44 SCI individuals completed the study and were analysed. The data obtained from the VAS analysis and the PainDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q) suggested that the combination of NFX88 with pregabalin is more effective than pregabalin with placebo at reducing neuropathic pain (NP) in individuals with SCI and that the dose 2.10 g/day causes the most dramatic pain relief., Conclusions: NFX88 treatment was found to be highly safe and well tolerated, with the dose of 2.10 g/day being the most effective at causing pain relief. Thus, the promising efficacy of this first-in-class lipid mediator deserves further consideration in future clinical trials., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Botulism has been known for about three centuries, and since its discovery, botulinum toxin has been considered one of the most powerful toxins. However, throughout the 20th century, several medical applications have been discovered, among which the treatment of spasticity stands out. Botulinum toxin is the only pharmacological treatment recommended for spasticity of strokes and cerebral palsy. Although its use as an adjuvant treatment against spasticity in spinal cord injuries is not even approved, botulinum toxin is being used against such injuries. This article describes the advances that have been made throughout history leading to the therapeutic use of botulinum toxin and, in particular, its application to the treatment of spasticity in spinal cord injury.

Context: Spasticity is one of the most frequent complications in spinal cord injury (SCI), and is routinely managed with oral pharmacologic therapy. Botulinum toxin (BT) is not accepted as a treatment for spasticity in SCI in Spain but may be used in certain cases of focal distribution., Objective: To report the results with BT for treatment of spasticity in SCI., Design and Setting: Descriptive retrospective study conducted at a specialist SCI rehabilitation center in Spain, covering patients first treated from 2012 through 2014, and successfully followed up for a minimum of 1 year. Data were collected on the following variables: demographic and SCI characteristics (level and grade); nature of spasticity, e.g. tone, distribution, spasms, articular involvement and pain; function; application of BT; tolerance and adverse reactions., Results: The study covered 90 patients, predominantly male with incomplete injuries. Improvement in tone as measured by the modified Ashworth scale was a mean of 1.17 points. Goniometric improvement was achieved in 65.6% and improvement in pain in 38.9% of cases. There were no adverse side-effects. Patients with focal spasticity showed a significantly greater improvement in tone (P < 0.0001). The earlier the BT injection, the greater the improvement in goniometric performance (P < 0.006) and pain (P < 0.033), with the best results being obtained within the first 6 months of clinical course. ASIA D injuries showed a greater improvement in tone (P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: BT can be both an effective treatment for focal spasticity in SCI and a good coadjuvant for oral treatments in generalized spasticity.