Search

Hospital and community based-studies had been conducted for Urinary Incontinence (UI) in Sub-Sahara Africa (SSA) countries. A significant limitation of these studies is likely under-estimation of the burden of UI in SSA. It is therefore, imperative that a well-structured systematic review and meta-analytical models in SSA are required to accurately and reliably estimate the burden of UI. Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, Africa Journal Online (AJOL) were searched to identified data on burden of UI studies in SSA. Two independent authors performed the initial screening of studies based on the details found in their titles and abstracts. The quality of the retrieved studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment instrument. The pooled burden of UI was calculated using a weighted inverse variance random-effects model. A sub-group and meta-regression analyses were performed. Publication bias was checked by the funnel plot and Egger's test. Of the 25 studies included, 14 were hospital-based, 10 community- based, and 1 university-based studies involving an overall 17863 participants from SSA. The systematic review showed that the prevalence of UI ranged from 0.6% in Sierra Leone to 42.1% in Tanzania. The estimated pooled burden of UI across all studies was 21% [95% CI: 16%-26%, I2 = 91.01%]. The estimated pooled prevalence of stress UI was 52% [95% CI: 42%-62%], urgency UI 21% [95% CI: 15%-26%], and mixed UI 27% [95% CI: 20%-35%]. The common significant independent factors were; parity, constipation, overweight/obese, vaginal delivery, chronic cough, gestational age, and aging. One out of every five women in SSA suffers from UI. Parity, constipation, overweight/obesity, vaginal delivery, chronic cough, gestational age, and age were the most important risk variables. As a result, interventions aimed at reducing the burden of UI in SSA women aged 15 to 100 years old in the context of identified determinants could have significant public health implications.

Hospital and community based-studies had been conducted for Urinary Incontinence (UI) in Sub-Sahara Africa (SSA) countries. A significant limitation of these studies is likely under-estimation of the burden of UI in SSA. It is therefore, imperative that a well-structured systematic review and meta-analytical models in SSA are required to accurately and reliably estimate the burden of UI. Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, Africa Journal Online (AJOL) were searched to identified data on burden of UI studies in SSA. Two independent authors performed the initial screening of studies based on the details found in their titles and abstracts. The quality of the retrieved studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment instrument. The pooled burden of UI was calculated using a weighted inverse variance random-effects model. A sub-group and meta-regression analyses were performed. Publication bias was checked by the funnel plot and Egger's test. Of the 25 studies included, 14 were hospital-based, 10 community- based, and 1 university-based studies involving an overall 17863 participants from SSA. The systematic review showed that the prevalence of UI ranged from 0.6% in Sierra Leone to 42.1% in Tanzania. The estimated pooled burden of UI across all studies was 21% [95% CI: 16%-26%, I2 = 91.01%]. The estimated pooled prevalence of stress UI was 52% [95% CI: 42%-62%], urgency UI 21% [95% CI: 15%-26%], and mixed UI 27% [95% CI: 20%-35%]. The common significant independent factors were; parity, constipation, overweight/obese, vaginal delivery, chronic cough, gestational age, and aging. One out of every five women in SSA suffers from UI. Parity, constipation, overweight/obesity, vaginal delivery, chronic cough, gestational age, and age were the most important risk variables. As a result, interventions aimed at reducing the burden of UI in SSA women aged 15 to 100 years old in the context of identified determinants could have significant public health implications., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2022 Ackah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)