1. Personalization of biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Less frequently accounted choice-driving variables
- Author
-
Francesca Li Gobbi, Fabrizio Cantini, Maurizio Benucci, Ombretta Di Munno, Corrado Blandizzi, Delia Goletti, Carlotta Nannini, Laura Niccoli, Marta Mosca, Olga Kaloudi, Stefania Mantarro, and Emanuele Cassarà
- Subjects
030213 general clinical medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Combination therapy ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all) ,Osteoporosis ,MEDLINE ,Fertility ,Biologics ,Infections ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Periodontal disease ,Medicine ,In patient ,Pharmacology (medical) ,General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics ,Intensive care medicine ,media_common ,Original Research ,030203 arthritis & rheumatology ,Pharmacology ,Chemical Health and Safety ,business.industry ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Immunogenicity ,Lupus-like syndrome ,Sexuality ,Safety Research ,Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all) ,Rheumatoid arthritis ,Methotrexate ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Objective To propose appropriate statements that drive the choice of biologic therapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), factoring in their impact on the following issues: anti-drug antibody (ADAb) formation, suspicion and management of infections, lupus-like syndrome (LLS), effects on bone mass and sexual sphere, and relationship between RA and periodontal disease (PD). Methods An overview of existing evidence was undertaken by an expert panel on behalf of the Italian board for the TAilored BIOlogic therapy (ITABIO). Data were extracted from controlled trials, national registries, national health care databases, post-marketing surveys, and, when required by the paucity of controlled studies, from open-label clinical series. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and non-anti-TNF-targeted biologics approved for RA were investigated. Results ADAb formation is chiefly associated with anti-TNFs, and it is reduced by combination therapy with methotrexate. To date, ADAb titration is not advisable for clinical practice, and, in case of anti-TNF secondary failure, a non-anti-TNF biologic is indicated. LLS is observed in anti-TNF receivers and, in most cases, resolves without anti-TNF withdrawal. A non-anti-TNF biologic is advisable in patients experiencing LLS. Non-anti-TNFs demonstrated a low or absent infection risk and are preferable in patients with comorbidities. Due to their positive effects on bone mass, anti-TNFs are indicated in women at osteoporosis risk, whereas non-anti-TNF have been poorly investigated. The emerging evidence of the relationship between RA and PD and the effects on anti-TNF efficacy should lead clinicians to consider the periodontal status in RA patients. Anti-TNFs may exert a positive effect on fertility and sexuality, and clinicians should explore these aspects in RA patients. Conclusion The optimization of biologic therapies by taking into proper account the above issues would improve patient outcomes.
- Published
- 2018