Search

Introduction: Interval cancer (IC) is an important quality indicator in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Previously, we found that fecal immunochemical test (FIT) ICs are more common in women, older age, right-sided tumors, and advanced stage. Here, we extended our existing stage IV patient cohort with clinicopathological and molecular characteristics, to identify factors associated with FIT-IC. Methods: Logistic regression models were fit to identify variables associated with the odds of having a stage IV FIT-IC. Multivariate models were corrected for gender, age, and location. Results: A total of 292 screen-detected (SD) CRCs and 215 FIT-IC CRCs were included. FIT-IC CRC had 5 fold higher odds to be a neuroendocrine (NET) tumor and 2.5 fold higher odds to have lymphovascular invasion. Interestingly, some variables lost significance upon accounting for location. Thus, tumor location is a critical covariate that should always be included when evaluating factors related to FIT-IC. Conclusions: We identified NETs and lymphovascular invasion as factors associated with increased odds of having a stage IV FIT-IC. Moreover, we highlight the importance of tumor location as a covariate in evaluating FIT-IC related factors. More research across all stages is needed to clarify how these insights might help to optimize the Flemish CRC screening program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

DNA methylation biomarkers have emerged as promising tools for cancer detection. Common methylation patterns across tumor types allow multi‐cancer detection. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has gained considerable attention for methylation detection. However, multi‐cancer detection using multiple targets in ddPCR has never been performed before. Therefore, we developed a multiplex ddPCR assay for multi‐cancer detection. Based on previous data analyses using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we selected differentially methylated targets for eight frequent tumor types (lung, breast, colorectal, prostate, pancreatic, head and neck, liver, and esophageal cancer). Three targets were validated using ddPCR in 103 tumor and 109 normal adjacent fresh frozen samples. Two distinct ddPCR assays were successfully developed. Output data from both assays is combined to obtain a read‐out from the three targets together. Our overall ddPCR assay has a cross‐validated area under the curve (cvAUC) of 0.948. Performance between distinct cancer types varies, with sensitivities ranging from 53.8% to 100% and specificities ranging from 80% to 100%. Compared to previously published single‐target parameters, we show that combining targets can drastically increase sensitivity and specificity, while lowering DNA input. In conclusion, we are the first to report a multi‐cancer methylation ddPCR assay, which allows for highly accurate tumor predictions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Since the 70s, a variety of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs have been adopted throughout the world with the aim of reducing the mortality rate of one of the leading cancer-related causes of death in the world. However, currently employed techniques present numerous shortcomings that negatively affect early-stage CRC detection, thus urging us to consider new and improved alternatives. Among the cited shortcomings are invasiveness and cultural stigma surrounding certain sample collection techniques, both of which negatively affect screening compliance. For this reason, many of the viable alternatives collected and described in this review aim to achieve good diagnostic performance while minimizing patient stress and discomfort. This text should serve as a guiding light for healthcare providers specialized in preventive medicine in the continuous pursuit of improved patient care. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading cancer-related causes of death in the world. Since the 70s, many countries have adopted different CRC screening programs, which has resulted in a decrease in mortality. However, current screening test options still present downsides. The commercialized stool-based tests present high false-positive rates and low sensitivity, which negatively affects the detection of early stage carcinogenesis. The gold standard colonoscopy has low uptake due to its invasiveness and the perception of discomfort and embarrassment that the procedure may bring. In this review, we collected and described the latest data about alternative CRC screening techniques that can overcome these disadvantages. Web of Science and PubMed were employed as search engines for studies reporting on CRC screening tests and future perspectives. The searches generated 555 articles, of which 93 titles were selected. Finally, a total of 50 studies, describing 14 different CRC alternative tests, were included. Among the investigated techniques, the main feature that could have an impact on CRC screening perception and uptake was the ease of sample collection. Urine, exhaled breath, and blood-based tests promise to achieve good diagnostic performance (sensitivity of 63–100%, 90–95%, and 47–97%, respectively) while minimizing stress and discomfort for the patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]