Search

Alkyl nitrites (“poppers”) are a diverse class of volatile chemical compounds with a varied legal and medical history. Though once commonly prescribed to treat angina, popper use is now almost exclusively recreational. Currently, poppers are widely available and sold legally under labels like “solvent cleaner”, despite marketing suggesting they are meant to be consumed. As a result, there is little incentive for producers to implement robust quality controls to protect users. In this study, nine common popper brands were analyzed using hydrogen-1 and carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to assess the presence of impurities. Physical labels on all nine samples indicated the contents were “pure” isobutyl nitrite, despite contradictory online marketing in several cases. Spectral results showed isobutyl nitrite was present in all popper samples. However, there was evidence that various unlabeled compounds were also present in all samples. The identity and concentration of these contaminants were not clear, but the seemingly ubiquitous presence of impurities and lack of consistency in the tested samples are concerning and may represent a threat to users’ health. We hope the results of this study draw attention to the potential dangers of recreational popper use and the need to reassess how these compounds are regulated.

Background:. The use of biologic mesh to reinforce the abdominal wall in ventral hernia repair has been proposed as a viable alternative to synthetic mesh, particularly for high-risk patients and in contaminated settings. However, a comparison of clinical outcomes between the currently available biologic mesh types has yet to be performed. Methods:. We performed a retrospective analysis of 141 patients who had undergone ventral hernia repair with biologic mesh, including noncross-linked porcine ADM (NC-PADM) (n = 51), cross-linked porcine ADM (C-PADM) (n = 17), reinforced biologic ovine rumen (RBOR) (n = 36), and bovine ADM (BADM) (n = 37) at the Stanford University Medical Center between 2002 and 2020. Postoperative donor site complications and rates of hernia recurrence were compared between patients with different biologic mesh types. Results:. Abdominal complications occurred in 47.1% of patients with NC-PADM, 52.9% of patients with C-PADM, 16.7% of patients with RBOR, and 43.2% of patients with BADM (P = 0.015). Relative risk for overall complications was higher in patients who had received NC-PADM (RR = 2.64, P = 0.0182), C-PADM (RR = 3.19, P = 0.0127), and BADM (RR = 2.11, P = 0.0773) compared with those who had received RBOR. Furthermore, relative risk for hernia recurrence was also higher in all other mesh types compared with RBOR. Conclusion:. Our data indicate that RBOR decreases abdominal complications and recurrence rates after ventral hernia repair compared with NC-PADM, C-PADM, and BADM.