Search

Background: Daratumumab's incorporation in the upfront treatment of light chain (AL) amyloidosis has led to daratumumab (dara) refractoriness early in disease course. Patients who experience relapse or have suboptimal response to dara-based-therapy, have limited options. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of venetoclax-based therapy in t(11;14) positive AL patients who previously failed dara. Methods: Thirty-one patients with AL were included in this bi-institutional retrospective analysis. Results: Dara failure was due to inadequate response in 20 (65%) patients, haematologic relapse in 7 (22%), and both haematologic plus organ relapse in 4 (13%). Overall haematologic response rate to venetoclax-based therapy was 97%, with ≥ VGPR being 91%. Of the 19 evaluable patients with cardiac involvement, 14 (74%) achieved organ response. Of the 13 evaluable patients with renal involvement, 6 (46%) achieved organ response. With a median follow-up of 22 months, median time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The 12- and 24-month TTNT rates were 74% and 56%, respectively. At data-cut-off, four patients had died, all from AL-related organ complications. The 12- and 24-month OS rates were 89% and 85%, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 26% of patients, with 6% due to infections. Conclusion: These findings are encouraging for the use of venetoclax as salvage therapy post-dara failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current treatment guidelines of myeloma cast nephropathy (MCN) recommend the institution of plasma cell‐directed therapy and consideration of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), with the goal of rapid reduction of the serum free light chain (sFLC). However, the role of TPE continues to remain a subject of debate. The goal of this retrospective bi‐institutional study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of TPE in combination with systemic therapy. Eighty patients were included in this analysis, of whom 72.5% had ≥50% drop in their initial involved sFLC. At 3 months from TPE initiation, the overall hematologic response rate (ORR) was 67.5% with a very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) rate of 40%. At 6 months, ORR was 57.5%, with ≥VGPR rate of 49%. The renal response rate at 3 and 6 months was 47.5% and 43.75%, respectively; the overall renal response rate was 48.75%. On multivariable analysis, every one unit increase in baseline creatinine (odds ratio [OR] 0.76, p = 0.006), and achievement of ≥VGPR (OR 21.7 p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with renal response. Also, a ≥50% drop in sFLC was favorably associated with renal response (OR 3.39, p = 0.09). With a median follow‐up of 36.4 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 11 months. On multivariable analysis, achievement of renal response (hazard ratio [HR] 0.3, p < 0.0001) and newly diagnosed disease (NDMM; HR 0.43, p = 0.0055) were associated with improved OS. Among NDMM patients, those treated with daratumumab‐based regimens had a trend for better OS (p = 0.15), compared to other regimens, but the difference was not significant. At the end of follow‐up, an estimated 40.4% of patients who were on dialysis were able to become dialysis independent. In conclusion, our study highlights the poor survival of patients with MCN. Achievement of early renal response is crucial for prolonged OS, with daratumumab‐based therapies showing promise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Light chain amyloidosis is a plasma–cell disorder with a poor prognosis. It is a progressive condition, causing worsening pain, disability, and life-limiting complications involving multiple organ systems. The medical regimen can be complex, including chemotherapy or immunotherapy for the disease itself, as well as treatment for pain, gastrointestinal and cardiorespiratory symptoms, and various secondary symptoms. Patients and their families must have a realistic awareness of the illness and of the goals and limitations of treatments in making informed decisions about medical therapy, supportive management, and end-of-life planning. Palliative care services can thus improve patients' quality of life and may even reduce overall treatment costs. Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a clonal plasma cell disorder characterized by the excessive secretion of light chains by an indolent plasma cell clone that gradually accumulates in vital organs as amyloid fibrils and leads to end-organ damage. With progressive disease, most patients develop diverse clinical symptoms and complications that negatively impact quality of life and increase mortality. Complications include cardiac problems including heart failure, hypotension, pleural effusions, renal involvement including nephrotic syndrome with peripheral edema, gastrointestinal symptoms leading to anorexia and cachexia, complex pain syndromes, and mood disorders. The prognosis of patients with advanced AL amyloidosis is dismal. With such a complex presentation, and high morbidity and mortality rates, there is a critical need for the establishment of a palliative care program in clinical management. This paper provides an evidence-based overview of the integration of palliative care in the clinical management of AL amyloidosis as a means of reducing ER visits, rehospitalizations, and in-hospital mortality. We also discuss potential future collaborative directions in various aspects of clinical care related to AL amyloidosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite significant progress and improving outcomes in the management of plasma cell disorders, AL amyloidosis remains diagnostically and therapeutically challenging for clinicians across practice settings. There is, however, a reason for optimism with the advent of new combination therapy approaches and novel targets offering the promise of improvement in end organ function, survival, and quality of life. This review offers a clinically applicable overview of an approach to diagnosis, risk stratification, and clinical management of AL amyloidosis in an era of rapid therapeutic innovation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Multiple myeloma is an incurable hematologic malignancy arising from terminally differentiated B-cells. Over the last decade, advancements in therapeutics have radically shifted the treatment landscape of MM, significantly improving the survival of patients. In this review, we will discuss the available therapeutic modalities for relapsed–refractory disease, highlighting critical factors that guide the therapy selection process. Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy in adults worldwide. Over the past few years, major therapeutic advances have improved progression-free and overall survival, as well as quality of life. Despite this recent progress, MM remains incurable in the vast majority of cases. Patients eventually relapse and become refractory to multiple drug classes, making long-term management challenging. In this review, we will focus on the treatment paradigm of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) in the era of advanced therapies emphasizing the available novel modalities that have recently been incorporated into routine practice, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies, and other promising approaches. We will also discuss major factors that influence the selection of appropriate drug combinations or cellular therapies, such as relapse characteristics, and other disease and patient related parameters. Our goal is to provide insight into the currently available and experimental therapies for RRMM in an effort to guide the therapeutic decision-making process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication commonly experienced in cancer patients. Incidence of VTE typically brings poor prognosis as it represents the second most common cause of mortality in cancer patients just after the malignancy itself. Studies suggest that multiple myeloma (MM) is among the malignancies with further enhanced risk of VTE, especially in patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). However, risk factors and preventative approaches remain poorly explored. Here, we explore the incidence of VTE in MM patients undergoing AHCT, while also highlighting risk factors and preventions that may aid in preventing VTE in patients who are at higher risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: The IMPEDE VTE score has recently emerged as a novel risk prediction tool for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in multiple myeloma (MM). We retrospectively reviewed 839 patients with newly diagnosed MM between 2010 and 2015 at Cleveland Clinic and included 575 patients in final analysis to validate this score. The c‐statistic of the IMPEDE VTE score to predict VTE within 6 months of treatment start was 0·68 (95% CI: 0·61–0·75). The 6‐month cumulative incidence of VTE was 5·0% (95% CI: 2·1–7·9) in the low risk group, compared to 12·6% (95% CI: 8·9–16·4%) and 24·1% (95% CI: 12·2–36·1) in the intermediate and high risk groups (P < 0·001 for both). In addition, a higher proportion of patients in the VTE cohort had ECOG performance status of ≥2 as compared to the no VTE cohort (33% vs. 16%, P = 0·001). Other MM characteristics such as stage, immunoglobulin subtype, and cytogenetics were not predictors of VTE. In summary, we have validated the IMPEDE VTE score in our patient cohort and our findings suggest that it can be utilized as a VTE risk stratification tool in prospective studies looking into investigating VTE prophylaxis strategies in MM patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractObjectiveMethodsResultsConclusion\nPLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYTalquetamab is the first-in-class GPRC5DxCD3 bispecific antibody for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Given limited real-world data, this study was conducted with US healthcare providers (HCPs) to understand real-world talquetamab dosing and symptom management.In February/March 2024, individual in-depth interviews (IDIs; n = 10) were conducted with HCPs administering talquetamab in real-world settings. A subsequent expert panel (n = 6) further discussed current practices.The IDIs reported a variety of settings for step-up dosing (SUD), including inpatient (n = 5), outpatient (n = 3), and hybrid models (n = 2), with a trend toward shorter SUD length to reduce healthcare resource utilization. Most HCPs used a biweekly (Q2W) schedule in SUD (n = 7) and treatment phases (n = 8). Six participants explored reducing dose frequency to every 4 weeks (Q4W) in patients following positive disease response to treatment, considering patient convenience and relieving GPRC5D-related symptoms. Panelists recommended symptom management and prophylactic strategies, such as dexamethasone and nystatin mouthwash or zinc and vitamin B complex for oral symptoms, and topical steroids and cosmetic products for skin and nail symptoms.This study outlines current real-world practices for talquetamab. Findings indicate variation in the SUD care setting. The 0.8 mg/kg Q2W dosing schedule was most common, although switching to Q4W is a real-world symptom management strategy for some patients with responses to therapy. GPRC5D-related symptom management approaches are evolving; prophylactic use of dexamethasone and nystatin mouthwash or zinc and vitamin B complex may be effective strategies to alleviate oral symptoms. Further real-world evidence is needed to inform optimal dosing schedules while mitigating symptom impact.Talquetamab is a new treatment that was approved in the United States in 2023 for a type of blood cancer called multiple myeloma. This drug is administered at one of two doses, each of which includes a defined step-up dosing schedule where patients first receive smaller amounts of the drug to help avoid serious side effects. Because talquetamab is new and associated with treatment-related symptoms not normally seen with other multiple myeloma treatments, doctors and patients need more guidance on drug administration and symptom management. In this study, we describe findings from interviews and an expert panel discussion with healthcare professionals who have experience using talquetamab. This study found that most healthcare professionals administered step-up dosing with patients staying overnight in the hospital, while other providers administered these doses during outpatient visits. Most providers administered talquetamab once every 2 weeks after utilizing the associated step-up dosing schedule. Additionally, healthcare providers described transitioning some patients, who had responded positively to treatment, to a less frequent dosing schedule of once per month to help reduce the effect of treatment-related symptoms. Participants in the expert panel described approaches for managing or preventing these symptoms, such as dexamethasone and nystatin mouthwashes or zinc and vitamin B complex for oral symptoms, and topical steroids and cosmetic products for skin and nail symptoms. In summary, this study provides valuable real-world information from healthcare providers who have experience treating patients with multiple myeloma with talquetamab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy and poses significant therapeutic challenges. This review synthesizes evidence from pivotal clinical trials to guide induction treatment for transplant-eligible (TE), newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients. Emphasizing the evolution from three-drug to four-drug induction therapies, we highlight the integration of monoclonal antibodies, particularly CD38 recombinant monoclonal antibody agents, into treatment regimens. This analysis includes a comprehensive literature review of research from major databases and conferences conducted between 2010 and 2023, culminating in the detailed evaluation of 47 studies. The findings underscore the superiority of quadruple regimens in TE NDMM, notably those incorporating daratumumab, in achieving superior responses including progression-free survival (PFS), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) when compared to triple-drug regimens. As treatment regimens evolve with additional agents, the improved outcomes with treatment-related adverse events should be carefully balanced. This review advocates for a paradigm shift towards quadruple induction therapies for TE NDMM, offers a detailed insight into the current landscape of MM treatment, and reinforces a new standard of care.