Search

PYHIN proteins are only found in mammals and play key roles in the defense against bacterial and viral pathogens. The corresponding gene locus shows variable deletion and expansion ranging from 0 genes in bats, over 1 in cows, and 4 in humans to a maximum of 13 in mice. While initially thought to act as cytosolic immune sensors that recognize foreign DNA, increasing evidence suggests that PYHIN proteins also inhibit viral pathogens by more direct mechanisms. Here, we examined the ability of all 13 murine PYHIN proteins to inhibit HIV-1 and murine leukemia virus (MLV). We show that overexpression of p203, p204, p205, p208, p209, p210, p211, and p212 strongly inhibits production of infectious HIV-1; p202, p207, and p213 had no significant effects, while p206 and p214 showed intermediate phenotypes. The inhibitory effects on infectious HIV-1 production correlated significantly with the suppression of reporter gene expression by a proviral Moloney MLV-eGFP construct and HIV-1 and Friend MLV LTR luciferase reporter constructs. Altogether, our data show that the antiretroviral activity of PYHIN proteins is conserved between men and mice and further support the key role of nuclear PYHIN proteins in innate antiviral immunity.

Summary: Subtype C is the most prevalent clade of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) worldwide. The reasons for this are poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that a characteristic additional third nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) binding site in the long terminal repeat (LTR) promoter allows subtype C HIV-1 strains to evade restriction by nuclear PYHIN proteins, which sequester the transcription factor Sp1. Further, other LTR alterations are responsible for rare PYHIN resistance of subtype B viruses. Resistance-conferring mutations generally reduce the dependency of HIV-1 on Sp1 for virus production and render LTR transcription highly responsive to stimulation by NF-κB/p65. A third NF-κB binding site increases infectious virus yield in primary CD4+ T cells in an γ-interferon-inducible protein 16 (IFI16)-dependent manner. Comprehensive sequence analyses suggest that the frequency of circulating PYHIN-resistant HIV-1 strains is increasing. Our finding that an additional NF-κB binding site in the LTR confers resistance to nuclear PYHIN proteins helps to explain the dominance of clade C HIV-1 strains.

Summary: IFI16 is an important player of the host intrinsic immune response. Among others, it has been reported to sense intermediate products of HIV-1 reverse transcription in the cytosol and to sequester the transcription factor Sp1 in the nucleus to attenuate viral gene expression. Here, we present three different methods to reduce IFI16 protein expression levels in HIV-1 primary target cells. These techniques can be adapted for the investigation of other cellular factors in primary macrophages and CD4+ T lymphocytes.For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Hotter et al. (2019) and Bosso et al. (2020).

Members of the family of pyrin and HIN domain containing (PYHIN) proteins play an emerging role in innate immunity. While absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) acts a cytosolic sensor of non-self DNA and plays a key role in inflammasome assembly, the γ-interferon-inducible protein 16 (IFI16) restricts retroviral gene expression by sequestering the transcription factor Sp1. Here, we show that the remaining two human PYHIN proteins, i.e. myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen (MNDA) and pyrin and HIN domain family member 1 (PYHIN1 or IFIX) share this antiretroviral function of IFI16. On average, knock-down of each of these three nuclear PYHIN proteins increased infectious HIV-1 yield from human macrophages by more than an order of magnitude. Similarly, knock-down of IFI16 strongly increased virus transcription and production in primary CD4+ T cells. The N-terminal pyrin domain (PYD) plus linker region containing a nuclear localization signal (NLS) were generally required and sufficient for Sp1 sequestration and anti-HIV-1 activity of IFI16, MNDA and PYHIN1. Replacement of the linker region of AIM2 by the NLS-containing linker of IFI16 resulted in a predominantly nuclear localization and conferred direct antiviral activity to AIM2 while attenuating its ability to form inflammasomes. The reverse change caused nuclear-to-cytoplasmic relocalization of IFI16 and impaired its antiretroviral activity but did not result in inflammasome assembly. We further show that the Zn-finger domain of Sp1 is critical for the interaction with IFI16 supporting that pyrin domains compete with DNA for Sp1 binding. Finally, we found that human PYHIN proteins also inhibit Hepatitis B virus and simian vacuolating virus 40 as well as the LINE-1 retrotransposon. Altogether, our data show that IFI16, PYHIN1 and MNDA restrict HIV-1 and other viral pathogens by interfering with Sp1-dependent gene expression and support an important role of nuclear PYHIN proteins in innate antiviral immunity.

Innate immune sensors and restriction factors are cellular proteins that synergize to build an effective first line of defense against viral infections. Innate sensors are usually constitutively expressed and capable of detecting pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) via specific pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) to stimulate the immune response. Restriction factors are frequently upregulated by interferons (IFNs) and may inhibit viral pathogens at essentially any stage of their replication cycle. Members of the Pyrin and hematopoietic interferon-inducible nuclear (HIN) domain (PYHIN) family have initially been recognized as important sensors of foreign nucleic acids and activators of the inflammasome and the IFN response. Accumulating evidence shows, however, that at least three of the four members of the human PYHIN family restrict viral pathogens independently of viral sensing and innate immune activation. In this review, we provide an overview on the role of human PYHIN proteins in the innate antiviral immune defense and on viral countermeasures.

Restriction factors are structurally and functionally diverse cellular proteins that constitute a first line of defense against viral pathogens. Exceptions exist, but typically these proteins are upregulated by interferons (IFNs), target viral components, and are rapidly evolving due to the continuous virus–host arms race. Restriction factors may target HIV replication at essentially each step of the retroviral replication cycle, and the suppression of viral transcription and the degradation of viral RNA transcripts are emerging as major innate immune defense mechanisms. Recent data show that some antiviral factors, such as the tripartite motif-containing protein 22 (TRIM22) and the γ-IFN-inducible protein 16 (IFI16), do not target HIV-1 itself but limit the availability of the cellular transcription factor specificity protein 1 (Sp1), which is critical for effective viral gene expression. In addition, several RNA-interacting cellular factors including RNAse L, the NEDD4-binding protein 1 (N4BP1), and the zinc finger antiviral protein (ZAP) have been identified as important immune effectors against HIV-1 that may be involved in the maintenance of the latent viral reservoirs, representing the major obstacle against viral elimination and cure. Here, we review recent findings on specific cellular antiviral factors targeting HIV-1 transcription or viral RNA transcripts and discuss their potential role in viral latency.

Background and Aims: We conducted a prospective study to examine the local anesthetic (LA) spread and the effectiveness for surgical anesthesia of ultrasound (US)-guided rectus sheath block (RSB) in adult patients undergoing umbilical hernia repair. Material and Methods: Thirty patients received at T-10 level a bilateral US-guided injection of 20 mL levobupivacaine 0.375% + epinephrine 5 μg/mL behind the rectus muscle to detach it from its sheath. Anesthetic spread into the rectus sheath was evaluated ultrasonographically at T-9 and T-11 levels and scored from 0 to 4. The RSB was defined effective for surgical anesthesia if it was able to guarantee an anesthetic level sufficient for surgery without any mepivacaine supplementation. Results: Overall, the block was effective for surgical anesthesia in 53.3% of patients (95% confidence interval, ±17.8). In the remaining patients, anesthesia supplementation was needed at cutaneous incision, whereas manipulation of the muscle and fascial planes was painless. No patients required general anesthesia. LA spreads as advocated (to T-9 and to T-11 bilaterally = spread score 4) in 8/30 patients (26.6%); in these cases, the block was 75% effective for surgery. The anesthetic spread was most negatively influenced by increased body mass index. Postoperative analgesia was excellent in 97% of patients. Conclusion: Use of RSB as an anesthetic management of umbilical herniorrhaphy is recommended only with anesthetic supplementation at the incision site.

No abstract available.