Search

This study investigated the effects of different resistance training (RT) volumes quantified by weekly sets at high intensity (load and effort) on dynamic strength adaptations and psychophysiological responses in trained individuals. Twenty-four athletes were randomly allocated to three groups that performed three (3 S, n=8), six (6 S, n=8), and nine (9 S, n=8) weekly sets, respectively, three times a week on the barbell back squat and bench press during an 8-week period. While all groups showcased strength gains (p<0.05), post hoc comparisons revealed that 6 S and 9 S elicited greater strength adaptations than 3 S in barbell back squat (p=0.027 and p=0.004, respectively) and bench press (p=0.001 and p=0.044, respectively). There were no differences between 6 S and 9 S conditions for back squat (p=0.999) and bench press (p=0.378). Although a time effect was observed for Session-RPE (p=0.014) and Total Quality Recovery scale (p=0.020), psychophysiological responses were similar among groups. Our findings suggest that performing six and nine weekly sets at high intensities led to greater strength gains compared to three weekly sets in strength-trained individuals, despite similar psychophysiological responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The barbell squat is a multijoint exercise often employed by athletes and fitness enthusiasts due to its beneficial effects on functional and morphological neuromuscular adaptations. This study compared the effects of squat variations on lower limb muscle strength and hypertrophy adaptations. Twenty‐four recreationally trained females were assigned to a 12‐week front squat (FS; n = 12) or back squat (BS; n = 12) resistance training protocol (twice per week). Maximum dynamic strength (1‐RM) on the 45° leg press, a nonspecific strength test, and muscle thickness of the proximal, middle, and distal portions of the lateral thigh were assessed at baseline and post‐training. A significant time versus group interaction was observed for 1‐RM values (F(1,22) = 10.53; p = 0.0004), indicating that BS training elicits greater improvements in muscle strength compared with FS training (p = 0.048). No time versus group interactions were found for muscle thickness (F(1,22) = 0.103; p = 0.752); however, there was a significant main effect of time for the proximal (F(1,22) = 7.794; p = 0.011), middle (F(1,22) = 7.091; p = 0.014), and distal portions (F(1,22) = 7.220; p = 0.013) of the lateral thigh. There were no between‐group differences for any muscle thickness portion (proximal: p = 0.971; middle: p = 0.844; and distal: p = 0.510). Our findings suggest that BS elicits greater improvements in lower limb muscle strength on the 45° leg press than FS, but hypertrophic adaptations are similar regardless of variations during the squat exercise. Highlights: Back squat training elicited greater strength‐related improvements in a nonspecific strength test than front squat training.Hypertrophic adaptations of the lateral thigh are similar between both squat variations.Both squat variations elicited similar growth at proximal, middle, and distal regions of the lateral thigh. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We investigated the effect of drop-set (DS) and rest-pause (RP) systems compared to traditional (TRAD) resistance training on muscular adaptations and psychophysiological responses. Methods: Twenty-seven trained men (age: 23.4 ± 3.4 years; resistance training experience: 5.1 ± 1.7 years) were assigned to experimental groups (DS: n = 9, 3 × 10 repetitions at 75% with 6 additional repetitions at 55% 1RM; RP: n = 9, 3 × 16 repetitions at 75% 1RM; TRAD: n = 9, 4 × 12 repetitions at 70% 1RM) and performed lower-limb training sessions twice a week for 8 weeks. Maximum dynamic strength (1RM) and localized muscular endurance (LME) tests were performed in 45° leg press at baseline and post intervention. Session-RPE was assessed 15 min after the end of each training session. Results: A significant time vs. group interaction was observed for 1RM (p = .012) and LME (p < .0001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that RP elicited greater gains in muscular strength than DS (p = .044) but not TRAD (p = .116); and DS elicited greater LME than RP (p < .001) and TRAD (p = .001). No statistical differences were observed in Session-RPE and training strain between conditions; however, RP promoted higher training monotony (p = .036) than DS and TRAD. Conclusions: The DS and RP systems have a potential role in training programs aiming to promote muscle strength and localized muscular endurance adaptations, respectively. However, RP may promote higher training monotony than DS and TRAD, even though the other psychophysiological responses are similar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We compared the effects of resistance training (ResisT) to pyramidal and traditional weightlifting sets on men's psychophysiological responses. In a randomized crossover design, 24 resistance-trained males performed drop-set, descending pyramid, and traditional ResisT in the barbell back squat, 45° leg press, and seated knee extension. We assessed participants' rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and feelings of pleasure/displeasure (FPD) at the end of each set and at 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes post-session. No differences were detected across ResisT Methods in total training volume (p = 0.180). Post hoc comparisons revealed that drop-set training elicited higher RPE (M 8.8 SD 0.7 arbitrary units) and lower FPD (M −1.4 SD 1.5 arbitrary units) values compared to descending pyramid (M Set RPE 8.0 SD 0.9 arbitrary units and M Set FPD 0.4 SD 1.6 arbitrary units) and traditional set (M Set RPE 7.5 SD 1.1 arbitrary units and M Set FPD 1.3 SD 1.2 arbitrary units) schemes (p < 0.05). In addition, drop-set training elicited higher session RPE (M 8.1 SD 0.8 arbitrary units) and lower session FPD (M 0.2 SD 1.4 arbitrary units) values than descending pyramid and traditional ResisT (p < 0.001). Similarly, descending pyramid training elicited higher session RPE (M 6.6 SD 0.9 arbitrary units) and lower session FPD (M 1.2 SD 1.4 arbitrary units) than traditional set (M Session RPE 5.9 SD 0.8 arbitrary units and M Session FPD 1.5 SD 1.2 arbitrary units) training (p = 0.015). No differences were found in the temporality of post-session metrics, suggesting that testing 10 and 15 minutes post-ResisT was sufficient to assess session RPE (p = 0.480) and session FPD (p = 0.855), respectively. In conclusion, even with similar total training volume, drop-set training elicited more pronounced psychophysiological responses than either pyramidal or traditional ResisT in resistance-trained males. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The tactical and physical demands of a soccer game are of interest to coaches and trainers for better prescription of the physical training process and understanding of the game's demands. When discussing the demands for games played by base categories, information is scarce. In this study, we will investigate correlations between physical and tactical variables of under-17 soccer players who competed in the 2019 FIFA Soccer World Cup. The objective of the present study was to analyze and associate the variables of physical performance (total distance covered) and technical performance (ball possession, number of passes, shots on goal, compaction with the ball and compaction without the ball) of male soccer players during the FIFA U-17 World Cup. Were analyzed 24 national teams participating in the under-17 football world cup, held in 2019. We selected from the technical report, accessed from the official website of the competition (www.fifa.com). Pearson's correlation test (r) was used to describe the association between variables. The correlation coefficient was classified as follows: 0.0 – 0.1 (trivial), >0.1 – 0.3 (minor), >0.3 – 0.5 (moderate), >0.5 – 0.7 (large), >0.7 – 0.9 (very large), and >0.9 – 1.0 (almost perfect). All procedures were performed in IBM SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics – Version 20.0). The total average distance covered during the competition was between 106 and 121 km per match. The average ball possession for each team was 36 – 61% per game. There were between 315 and 588 passes and 6 – 24 shots on goal per match. The average compaction per match with ball possession was between 708 and 1081 meters², and without ball possession was 500 – 744 meters². Correlations classified as 'very large' were observed between possession of the ball and passes (r= 0.814), 'great' between total distance and compaction without the ball (r= -0.599) and passes and compaction without the ball (r= -0.555), 'small' between total distance and possession of the ball (r= 0.219), total distance and compaction with the ball (r= -0.103) and passes and compaction with the ball (r= -0.254) and 'trivial' between total distance and shots a goal (r = -0.075) and possession and compaction without the ball (r = -0.001). It was observed that the exchange of passes is an important foundation for maintaining possession of the ball, exploring spaces on the field of play and reducing physical demand. Coaches and trainers can develop the physical capabilities of players to serve as a basis for executing technical and tactical demands. Thus, based on our results, we suggest that technicians and trainers search for means and methods of physical and tactical training that are more efficient for the age group in question. In this way, players will be able to fulfill their duties during the game, pass with greater possibilities of reaching the goal and finish on goal when they are better positioned. The choice of this strategy will make it possible to improve the performance of the team/players during matches during the competition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigated the effects of biset, drop-set and traditional resistance training (RT) techniques on metabolic responses in resistance-trained males. Fifteen trained males (age 29.7 ± 6.1 years; body mass 83.4 ± 7.6 kg; RT experience 11.4 ± 6.7 years; one-repetition maximum (1RM) barbell bench press: body mass ratio 1.4 ± 0.1 a.u.) were assigned to three experimental conditions, in a randomized crossover design. The experimental conditions were bi-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM in barbell bench press followed by 10 repetitions at 60%1RM in incline bench press), drop-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM followed by 10 repetitions at 50%1RM in barbell bench press) and traditional RT (3×20 at 60%1RM in barbell bench press). A portable gas analyzer was used to assess energy expenditure and maximal oxygen uptake during the experimental protocols. Blood lactate levels were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, and 5 minutes after the training session. There were no differences for total training volume ( p = 0.999). Post hoc comparisons revealed that bi-set elicited higher aerobic energy expenditure ( p = 0.003 vs. drop-set; p < 0.001 vs. traditional RT) and aerobic oxygen consumption ( p = 0.034 vs. drop-set; p < 0.001 vs. traditional RT) than other RT schemes. There were no differences regarding anaerobic EE between-conditions ( p > 0.05). There was a main effect of time and condition for blood lactate levels ( p < 0.001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that drop-set training elicited higher blood lactate levels than traditional RT ( p = 0.009). The results suggest that RT techniques may have a potential role in optimizing metabolic responses in resistance-trained males.