Search

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is etiologically complex, with well- documented genetic and nongenetic origins. In this Review, we speculate that the development of IPF requires two hits: the first establishes a vulnerable bronchoalveolar epithelium, and the second triggers mechanisms that reprogram distal epithelia to initiate and perpetuate a profibrotic phenotype. While vulnerability of the bronchoalveolar epithelia is most often driven by common or rare genetic variants, subsequent injury of the bronchoalveolar epithelia results in persistent changes in cell biology that disrupt tissue homeostasis and activate fibroblasts. The dynamic biology of IPF can best be contextualized etiologically and temporally, including stages of vulnerability, early disease, and persistent and progressive lung fibrosis. These dimensions of IPF highlight critical mechanisms that adversely disrupt epithelial function, activate fibroblasts, and lead to lung remodeling. Together with better recognition of early disease, this conceptual approach should lead to the development of novel therapeutics directed at the etiologic and temporal drivers of lung fibrosis that will ultimately transform the care of patients with IPF from palliative to curative., Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive lung disease, characterized by heterogeneous subpleural patches of fibrotic remodeled lung, that follows a bronchocentric distribution (1-3). The median survival is 3-5 years [...]

Background: Advances in the field of genetics of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) have led to the recent consensus statements made by expert groups. International standards for genetic testing in ILD have not yet been established. We aimed to examine current real-world strategies employed by pulmonologists working with familial ILD. Methods: A panel of pulmonologists with expertise in ILD developed an international survey aimed at clinicians working with ILD. The survey consisted of 74 questions divided into eight topics: characteristics of respondents, diagnosis, screening of first-degree relatives, screening tools, genetic testing methods, lung transplantation, ethical concerns, and future needs. Results: Overall, 237 pulmonologists from 50 countries participated. A family history of ILD was asked for by 91% of respondents while fewer asked for symptoms related to telomere disorders. Respondents stated that 59% had access to genetic testing, and 30% to a genetic multidisciplinary team (MDT). Many respondents were unaware of specific genetic testing methods. Pathogenic genetic variants were seen as a potential contraindication for lung transplantation in 6–8% of respondents. Genetic screening of relatives was supported by 80% of respondents who indicated insufficient evidence and a lack of formal guidelines for genetics and ILD. Only 16% had a standardized program. Conclusion: Most pulmonologists ask for a family history of ILD and recommend genetic testing for ILD and screening in relatives but have limited knowledge of specific tests and access to genetic MDT. Evidence-based guidelines to inform patients, relatives, and physicians are still warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by a progressive decline in lung function, worsening quality of life, and high mortality. However, the rate and pattern of progression of IPF are variable. Realworld studies, which include a broader population of patients than clinical trials and collect data over longer periods, have provided important information on the clinical course of IPF and further insights into the efficacy and safety of antifibrotic therapies. They also highlight the worsening of patients' quality of life as lung function is lost, the high frequency of hospitalizations, and the impact of acute exacerbations on mortality in patients with IPF. Data from patient registries and analyses of claims data suggest that antifibrotic therapy is more likely to be used in patients who have worse lung function and that its use is associated with an improvement in life expectancy. The safety profile of antifibrotic therapies in real-world populations is consistent with that observed in clinical trials. Further real-world studies are needed to improve understanding of the course and impact of IPF in specific groups of patients and how the care provided to these patients might be improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Observational studies report a significant protective effect of antifibrotics on mortality among patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Many of these studies, however, were subject to immortal time bias because of the mishandling of delayed antifibrotic initiation. Objectives: To evaluate the antifibrotic effect on mortality among patients with IPF using appropriate statistical methods that avoid immortal time bias. Methods: Using a large administrative database, we identified 10,289 patients with IPF, of whom 2,300 used antifibrotics. Treating delayed antifibrotic initiation as a time-dependent variable, three statistical methods were used to control baseline characteristics and avoid immortal time bias. Stratified analysis was performed for patients who initiated antifibrotics early and those who initiated treatment late. For comparison, methods that mishandle immortal time bias were performed. A simulation study was conducted to demonstrate the performance of these models in a wide range of scenarios. Results: All three statistical methods yielded nonsignificant results for the antifibrotic effect on mortality, with the stratified analysis for patients with early antifibrotic initiation suggesting evidence for reduced mortality risk (for all patients, hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.79–1.01; P = 0.08; for patients who were 65 years or older, hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.73–0.98; P = 0.03). Methods that mishandle immortal time bias demonstrated significantly lower mortality risk for antifibrotic users. Bias of these methods was evident in the simulation study, where appropriate methods performed well with little to no bias. Conclusions: Findings in this study did not confirm an association between antifibrotics and mortality, with a stratified analysis showing support for a potential treatment effect with early treatment initiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common pulmonary complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), causing significant morbidity and mortality. Optimal treatment for RA-ILD is not yet well defined. Reliable prognostic indicators are largely byproducts of prior ILD progression, including low or decreasing forced vital capacity and extensive or worsening fibrosis on imaging. In the absence of validated tools to predict treatment response, decisions about whether to initiate or augment treatment are instead based on clinical judgment. In general, treatment should be initiated in patients who are symptomatic, progressing, or at high risk of poor outcomes. Retrospective data suggest that mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and rituximab are likely effective therapies for RA-ILD. Abatacept is also emerging as a potential first-line treatment option for patients with RA-ILD. Further, recent data demonstrate that immunosuppression may be beneficial even in patients with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on imaging, suggesting that immunosuppression should be considered irrespective of imaging pattern. Recent randomized controlled trials have shown that antifibrotic medications, such as nintedanib and likely pirfenidone, slow forced vital capacity decline in RA-ILD. Consideration can be given to antifibrotic initiation in patients progressing despite immunosuppression, particularly in patients with a UIP pattern. Future research directions include developing tools to predict which patients will remain stable from patients who will progress, discriminating patients who will respond to treatment from nonresponders, and developing algorithms for starting immunosuppression, antifibrotics, or both as first-line therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Author(s): Sandra Chartrand [sup.1] [sup.2] , Joyce S. Lee [sup.3] , Jeffrey J. Swigris [sup.4] , Lina Stanchev [sup.3] , Aryeh Fischer [sup.5] Author Affiliations: (1) grid.14848.31, 0000 0001 2292 [...], Objective To describe the phenotypic characteristics and natural history of patients with autoimmune forms of interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods Retrospective, descriptive, single-center study of patients with autoimmune forms of ILD evaluated between February 2008 and August 2014. All data were extracted from the electronic medical record. Longitudinal changes in forced vital capacity (FVC%) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco%) in percent predicted were analyzed and time-to-event analyses for death were performed using Cox regression. Results Of the entire cohort (n = 243), systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated ILD (n = 88, 36%), interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF, n = 56, 23%), rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated ILD (n = 42, 17%), and idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM)-associated ILD (n = 26, 11%) were the most common phenotypes. The SSc-ILD, IIM-ILD, and IPAF groups had similar features: average age in the mid-50s, strongly female predominant and more likely to have nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). In contrast, RA-ILD patients were older, gender balanced, more likely to be past smokers and were UIP predominant. Adjusted longitudinal lung function was stable during a median follow-up period of nearly 4 years and the independent predictors for death were older age (p = 0.003), male sex (p = 0.019), and lower FVC (p = < 0.001). Conclusions The predominant phenotypes of autoimmune ILD were SSc-ILD, IPAF, RA-ILD, and IIM-ILD. In contrast to the other subsets, those with RA-ILD may be older, gender balanced, with more smoking history, and higher proportion of UIP. Longitudinal lung function was stable among the groups and younger age, female gender, and better lung function were associated with improved survival.

Abstract Background Stress of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) leading to activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) and alveolar epithelial cell (AEC) apoptosis may play a role in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Our objectives were to determine whether circulating caspase-cleaved cytokeratin-18 (cCK-18) is a marker of AEC apoptosis in IPF, define the relationship of cCK-18 with activation of the UPR, and assess its utility as a diagnostic biomarker. Methods IPF and normal lung tissues were stained with the antibody (M30) that specifically binds cCK-18. The relationship between markers of the UPR and cCK-18 was determined in AECs exposed in vitro to thapsigargin to induce ER stress. cCK-18 was measured in serum from subjects with IPF, hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), and control subjects. Results cCK-18 immunoreactivity was present in AECs of IPF lung, but not in control subjects. Markers of the UPR (phosphorylated IRE-1α and spliced XBP-1) were more highly expressed in IPF type II AECs than in normal type II AECs. Phosphorylated IRE-1α and cCK-18 increased following thapsigargin-induced ER stress. Serum cCK-18 level distinguished IPF from diseased and control subjects. Serum cCK-18 was not associated with disease severity or outcome. Conclusions cCK-18 may be a marker of AEC apoptosis and UPR activation in patients with IPF. Circulating levels of cCK-18 are increased in patients with IPF and cCK-18 may be a useful diagnostic biomarker.