Search

Little is known about the mechanisms that generate epileptic spasms following perinatal brain injury. Recent studies have implicated reduced levels of Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) in these patients' brains. Other studies have reported low levels of the inhibitory neurotransmitter, GABA. In the TTX brain injury model of epileptic spasms, we undertook experiments to evaluate the impact of IGF-1 deficiencies on neocortical interneurons and their role in spasms. Quantitative immunohistochemical analyses revealed that neocortical interneurons that express glutamic acid decarboxylase, parvalbumin, or synaptotagmin 2 co-express IGF-1. In epileptic rats, expression of these three interneuron markers were reduced in the neocortex. IGF-1 expression was also reduced, but surprisingly this loss was confined to interneurons. Interneuron connectivity was reduced in tandem with IGF-1 deficiencies. Similar changes were observed in surgically resected neocortex from infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) patients. To evaluate the impact of IGF-1 deficiencies on interneuron development, IGF-1R levels were reduced in the neocortex of neonatal conditional IGF-1R knock out mice by viral injections. Four weeks later, this experimental maneuver resulted in similar reductions in interneuron connectivity. Treatment with the IGF-1 derived tripeptide, (1-3)IGF-1, abolished epileptic spasms in most animals, rescued interneuron connectivity, and restored neocortical levels of IGF-1. Our results implicate interneuron IGF-1 deficiencies, possibly impaired autocrine IGF-1 signaling and a resultant interneuron dysmaturation in epileptic spasm generation. By restoring IGF-1 levels, (1-3)IGF-1 likely suppresses spasms by rescuing interneuron connectivity. Results point to (1-3)IGF-1 and its analogues as potential novel disease-modifying therapies for this neurodevelopmental disorder., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest J.W.S., J.T.L., and J.D.F. Jr. are inventors in a patent (US Patent 11,351,229) held by Baylor College of Medicine that covers therapies for treating infantile spasms and other treatment-resistant epilepsies., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

For patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), dual immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with CTLA4 inhibitors and PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (hereafter, PD-(L)1 inhibitors) is associated with higher rates of anti-tumour activity and immune-related toxicities, when compared with treatment with PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone. However, there are currently no validated biomarkers to identify which patients will benefit from dual ICB 1,2 . Here we show that patients with NSCLC who have mutations in the STK11 and/or KEAP1 tumour suppressor genes derived clinical benefit from dual ICB with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab and the CTLA4 inhibitor tremelimumab, but not from durvalumab alone, when added to chemotherapy in the randomized phase III POSEIDON trial 3 . Unbiased genetic screens identified loss of both of these tumour suppressor genes as independent drivers of resistance to PD-(L)1 inhibition, and showed that loss of Keap1 was the strongest genomic predictor of dual ICB efficacy-a finding that was confirmed in several mouse models of Kras-driven NSCLC. In both mouse models and patients, KEAP1 and STK11 alterations were associated with an adverse tumour microenvironment, which was characterized by a preponderance of suppressive myeloid cells and the depletion of CD8 + cytotoxic T cells, but relative sparing of CD4 + effector subsets. Dual ICB potently engaged CD4 + effector cells and reprogrammed the tumour myeloid cell compartment towards inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)-expressing tumoricidal phenotypes that-together with CD4 + and CD8 + T cells-contributed to anti-tumour efficacy. These data support the use of chemo-immunotherapy with dual ICB to mitigate resistance to PD-(L)1 inhibition in patients with NSCLC who have STK11 and/or KEAP1 alterations., Competing Interests: Competing interests F.S. reports consulting for AstraZeneca, Amgen, Revolution Medicines, Novartis, BridgeBio, Beigene, BergenBio, Guardant Health, Calithera Biosciences, Tango Therapeutics, Hookipa Pharma, Novocure, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche; grant or research support from Amgen, Mirati Therapeutics, Revolution Medicines, Pfizer, Novartis, Merck & Co; stockholder in BioNTech, Moderna; and honoraria from ESMO, Japanese Lung Cancer Society, Medscape, Intellisphere, VSPO McGill Universite de Montreal, RV Mais Promocao Eventos, MJH Life Sciences, IDEOlogy Health, MI&T, PER, CURIO, DAVA Oncology, the American Association for Cancer Research and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. M.M. reports stockholder in Roche Holdings. N.J. reports shareholder and former employee of Pionyr Immunotherapeutics. J.M.J. reports stock of D2G Oncology. C.M., Y.Y., X.P. and A.H. report employee of Tango Therapeutics. K.C.A. reports personal fees from Sanofi Genzyme and other support from Revolution Medicines, Genentech, and Mirati outside the submitted work. N.V. receives consulting fees from Sanofi Genzyme, Oncocyte, Eli Lilly, Regeneron, and research funding to the institution from Mirati, Oncocyte, and Circulogene, outside the submitted work. P.D.P. reports advisory fees from AstraZeneca and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. M.E.M. reports research funding from Eli Lilly (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Merck (Inst), Genentech (Inst); consulting role with AstraZeneca, Novocure, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Takeda, Blueprint Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ikena; honorarium from Thermo Fisher Scientific; and stock in Merck, Johnson & Johnson. M.M.A. reports grants and personal fees from Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca; grants from Lilly; and personal fees from Maverick, Blueprint Medicine, Syndax, Nektar, Gritstone, ArcherDX, Mirati, NextCure, Novartis, EMD Serono and Panvaxal/NovaRX, outside of the submitted work. J.C.M. reports consulting or honoraria: MJH Life Sciences, Johnson & Johnson and Doximity; and research funding (to institution): Merck via the Conquer Cancer Foundation. J.F.G. reports served as a compensated consultant or received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech (Roche), Takeda, Loxo (Lilly), Blueprint Medicine, Gilead, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Mariana Therapeutics, Mirati, Jounce, Merus Pharmacueticals, Nuvalent, Pfizer, Novocure, AI Proteins, Novartis, Merck, iTeos, Karyopharm and Silverback Therapeutics; research support from Novartis, Genentech (Roche) and Takeda; institutional research support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Palleon, Tesaro, Moderna, Blueprint, Jounce, Array Biopharma, Merck, Adaptimmune, Novartis and Alexo; has equity in AI Proteins; and has an immediate family member who is an employee with equity at Ironwood Pharmaceuticals. A.D. reports honoraria: Intellisphere, Roche (Genentech); ad board: TP Therapeutics, Guardant Health, AnHeart Therapeutics, ChromaCode; clinical trial support: Syntrix Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Merck, AnHeart Therapeutics, Sorrento Therapeutics, Guardant Health and Philogen. C. M. Bestvina reports consulting or advisory role: AstraZeneca, Genentech, AbbVie, Curio Science, OncLive Clinical Congress Consultants, Seagen, Creative Educational Concepts, Takeda, Janssen, CVS, Bristol Myers Squibb (Celgene), Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Sanofi–Regeneron and Novocure; speakers’ bureau: Merck; research funding: Bristol Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. C.A.S. reports advisory boards to AstraZeneca, Gilead, Janssen, Genentech, Mirati, Takeda and Arcus Biosciences. J.W.R. reports honoraria or consulting (self): Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Turning Point Roche (Genentech), Biodesix, EMD Serono, Daiichi Sankyo, Blueprint, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Beigene, Merus and Seagen; research support (to institution): ArriVent, Merck, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Spectrum, Revolution Medicines, IO Biotech and Kinnate. C. M. Blakely reports research funding: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Mirati, Spectrum, Takeda, Puma and Pfizer; and consulting: Janssen and Bayer. C.V.P. reports a founder and equity and intellectual property in EnFuego Therapeutics. F.T. reports speaker bureau or honoraria: Roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis and Takeda. M.S. reports institutional support: Dracen Pharmaceuticals; advisory board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Siemens Healthineers, Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Bristol Myers Squibb; leadership or fiduciary role: ESMO and EORTC. S.D. reports independent image analysis for hospital-contracted clinical research trials programs for Merck, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche, Polaris, Cascadian, Abbvie, Gradalis, Bayer, Zai laboratories, Biengen, Resonance and Analise; research grants from Lunit, GE, Qure AI; and an honorarium from Siemens. M.J.M. reports AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb and Istari Oncology & Regeneron. A.G.S. reports AstraZeneca, Genentech (Roche) and Bristol Myers Squibb. A.N.S. reports serving as a consultant and/or advisory board member for Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo and Zymeworks; and research funding from Eli Lilly, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Memgen, Mersana, Turning Point Therapeutics, BioAtla and Genmab to his institution. J.R. reports consulting fees or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Takeda, Sanofi Genzyme, Genentech, Guardant Health, Summit, G1 Therapeutics, BioAtla, Jazz, Amgen, and Janssen; contracted for research (institutional) with AstraZeneca, BioAtla, Blueprint Medicines, EpimAb Biotherapeutics, LOXO Oncology, Enliven, Redcloud and ORIC. T.S. reports advisory board or consulting fees for Seagen, Astellas and AstraZeneca; and research grant GRAIL. S.B.G. reports research funding from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and Mirati; and consulting or advisory board member for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Amgen, Blueprint Medicine, Sanofi Genzyme, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, Janssen, Summit Therapeutics, Merck and Regeneron. J.K. reports for Arterys. K.S. reports consultant, advisor or speaker for Clinica Alemana Santiago, Shattuck Labs, AstraZeneca, EMD Serono, Takeda, Torque/Repertoire Therapeutics, CSRlife, Agenus, Genmab, OnCusp, Parthenon Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Molecular Templates, Abbvie, Sanofi, Merck, PeerView, PER and Forefront Collaborative; research funding from Navigate BP, Tesaro/GSK, Moderna, Takeda, Surface Oncology, Pierre-Fabre, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Ribon Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech (Roche) and Akoya Biosciences. K.D.D. reports consulting fees or other remuneration from Rain Therapeutics. V.A. reports research funding to Johns Hopkins University from AstraZeneca and Personal Genome Diagnostics, has received research funding to Johns Hopkins University from Bristol Myers Squibb and Delfi Diagnostics in the past five years and is an advisory board member for Neogenomics and AstraZeneca. V.A. is an inventor on patent applications (63/276,525, 17/779,936, 16/312,152, 16/341,862, 17/047,006 and 17/598,690) submitted by Johns Hopkins University related to cancer genomic analyses, ctDNA therapeutic response monitoring and immunogenomic features of response to immunotherapy that have been licensed to one or more entities. Under the terms of these license agreements, the University and inventors are entitled to fees and royalty distributions. K.A.M. reports consulting or advisory fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Janssen, Mirati Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo (Lilly) and Puma Biotechnology, as well as honoraria from AstraZeneca. K.A.M. receives research funding to Johns Hopkins University from Bristol Myers Squibb and Mirati Therapeutics. P.M.F. reports consulting fee (for example, advisory board): Ascendis, AstraZeneca, BMS, Curevac, Novartis, Regeneron, G1, Genelux, Genentech, Gritstone, Merck, Janssen, F-Star, Sanofi, Amgen, Fosun, Teva, Synthekine, Flame, Iteos, Tavotek and Teva; contracted research: AstraZeneca, BMS, Novartis, Regeneron and BioNTech. B.R. reports advisory board or consultant: Regeneron, AstraZeneca, Amgen; honoraria: Targeted Oncology. E.M.V.A reports advisory or consulting: Tango Therapeutics, Genome Medical, Genomic Life, Enara Bio, Manifold Bio, Monte Rosa, Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Riva Therapeutics and Serinus Bio; research support: Novartis, BMS and Sanofi; equity: Tango Therapeutics, Genome Medical, Genomic Life, Syapse, Enara Bio, Manifold Bio, Microsoft, Monte Rosa, Riva Therapeutics and Serinus Bio; patents: institutional patents filed on chromatin mutations and immunotherapy response, and methods for clinical interpretation; intermittent legal consulting on patents for Foaley & Hoag; editorial boards: JCO Precision Oncology and Science Advances. A.L.C. reports consulting for AstraZeneca, Merus and Tempus; research funds from AstraZeneca, Genentech (Roche), Merck and Novartis. J.W.G. reports research grants: AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Merck and Pfizer; consulting fees: AstraZeneca, BMS, Genentech, Gilead, Gritstone, Eli Lilly, Pfizer and Regeneron. C.A. reports consulting or advisory role: Genentech, Lilly, Celgene, Merck, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Genetics, Shionogi, Daiichi Sankyo–AstraZeneca, Sanofi/Regeneron, Eisai, BeiGene, Turning Point Therapeutics, Pfizer, Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim; research funding: Genentech/Roche (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Macrogenics (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst) and AstraZeneca–MedImmune (Inst). L.R. reports honoraria: Merck, AstraZeneca, Genzyme, EMD Serono and Astellas Pharmas; consulting or advisory role: Amgen. J.W.N. reports honoraria: CME Matters, Clinical Care Options CME, Research to Practice CME, Medscape CME, Biomedical Learning Institute CME, MLI Peerview CME, Prime Oncology CME, Projects in Knowledge CME, Rockpointe CME, MJH Life Sciences CME, Medical Educator Consortium, HMP education consulting or advisory role: AstraZeneca, Genentech (Roche), Exelixis, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Amgen, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Blueprint Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Natera, Sanofi, D2G Oncology, Surface Oncology, Turning Point Therapeutics, Mirati Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Abbive, Summit Therapeutics, Novartis, Novocure, Janssen Oncology, Anheart Therapeutics Research Funding: Genentech (Roche), Merck, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Exelixis, Nektart Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Adaptimmune, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie Pharmaceuticals and Novocure. Y.Y.E. reports honoraria: CME Matters, Clinical Care Options CME, Research to Practice CME, Medscape CME, Biomedical Learning Institute CME, MLI Peerview CME, Prime Oncology CME, Projects in Knowledge CME, Rockpointe CME, MJH Life Sciences CME, Medical Educator Consortium, HMP education consulting or advisory role: AstraZeneca, Genentech (Roche), Exelixis, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Amgen, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Blueprint Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Natera, Sanofi, D2G Oncology, Surface Oncology, Turning Point Therapeutics, Mirati Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Abbive, Summit Therapeutics, Novartis, Novocure, Janssen Oncology, Anheart Therapeutics Reserach Funding: Genentech/Roche, Merck, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Exelixis, Nektart Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Adaptimmune, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie Pharmaceuticals and Novocure. M.V.N. reports research funding to institution: Mirati, Novartis, Checkmate (ended), Alaunos, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Genentech, Navire; consultant or advisory board: Mirati, Merck/MSD, Novartis and Genentech. X.L. reports receiving consulting or advisory fees from EMD Serono (Merck KGaA), AstraZeneca, Spectrum Pharmaceutics, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Hengrui Therapeutics, Janssen, Blueprint Medicines, Regeneron, Sensei Biotherapeutics, Abion and Abbvie, and research funding from Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Janssen, ArriVent, Teligene, BlackDiamond, Regeneron and Boehringer Ingelheim. V.K.L. reports consultant or advisory role for Takeda, Seattle Genetics, BMS, AstraZeneca, Guardant Health and AnHeart Therapeutics and has received research funding from GSK, BMS, AstraZeneca, Merck and Seattle Genetics. W.E.L. reports advisory boards: Eisai and Takeda, Grand Rounds and BMS for repotrectinib. J.A.R. reports consultancy, stock, Genprex; patents issued and pending. T.C. reports speaker fees or honoraria from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC), Mark Foundation for Cancer Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Medscape, IDEOlogy Health, Physicians’ Education Resource (PER), OncLive and PeerView; travel and/or food/beverage expenses from SITC, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, PER, Dava Oncology, IDEOlogy Health, AstraZeneca and Bristol Myers Squibb; advisory role or consulting fees from MedImmune–AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Genentech, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer and Regeneron; and institutional research funding from MedImmune–AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb and EMD Serono. J.Z. reports grants from Merck, grants and personal fees from Johnson & Johnson and Novartis, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, GenePlus, Innovent and Hengrui outside the submitted work. G.R.B. reports grant or contract for clinical trial from MacroGenics; grants from Amgen, Bayer, Adaptimmune, Exelixis, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Immatics, Immunocore, Incyte, Kite Pharma, MacroGenics, Torque, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, MedImmune, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Xcovery, Tmunity Therapeutics, Regeneron, BeiGene, Repertoire Immune Medicines, Verastem, CytomX Therapeutics and Duality Biologics; consulting fees from AbbVie, Adicet, Amgen, Ariad, Bayer, Clovis Oncology, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Instil Bio, Genentech, Genzyme, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MedImmune, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Tyme Oncology, Xcovery, Virogin Biotech, Maverick Therapeutics, BeiGene, Regeneron, Cytomx Therapeutics, Intervenn Biosciences and Onconova Therapeutics; participation in advisory boards at Virogin Biotech and Maverick Therapeutics; stock in Virogin Biotech; and employment of family member at Johnson & Johnson/Janssen. C.G. reports member of the advisory board at Jazz Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca and Bristol Myers Squibb and served as speaker for AstraZeneca and BeiGene. L.A.B. reports consulting fees and research funding from AstraZeneca, GenMab and Sierra Oncology and research funding from Tolero Pharmaceuticals and served as advisor or consultant for PharmaMar, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Alethia, Merck, Pfizer, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Genentech and Debiopharm Group. D.L.G. reports AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Menarini Richerche, 4D Pharma, Onconova Therapeutics and Sanofi. A.T. reports Ariad, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Gilead Sciences and Summit Therapeutics. T.G.B. reports Chan-Zuckerberg Biohub. D.R.C. reports CoI Company sponsored trials at institution (PI roles): AZ, Roche (Genentech) advisory role: ad hoc advisory boards or consultations 2023: Abbvie (steering committee), Anheart, Beigene (IDMC), Eli Lilly (IDMC), Imagene, Immunocore, Janssen, Mirati (IDMC), Prelude, Seattle Genetics, Valencee; 2022: Abbvie, Anheart, Appolomics (SRC), AstraZeneca–Daiichi (ILD adjudication committee), Beigene (DSMB) Dizal, EMD Serono, Elevation, Hengrui, (DSMB), Hummingbird, Janssen, Medtronic, Mersana (ILD adjudication committee), Mirati, Nalo Therapeutics, Onkure, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, Theseus, Xcovery; 2021: Abbvie, Amgen, Anheart, Apollomics (SRC), AstraZeneca (SRC/SC), Beigene (DSMC), Bio-Thera (DSMB), Blueprint, Daiichi Sankyo (ILD adjudication committee), Elevation (SRC), Eli Lilly (DSMB and NCCN), EMD Serono, Helsinn (DSMB), Hengrui (DSMC), Janssen, Kestrel (SAB, Shares), Mersana, Nuvalent (SAB), Puma (NCCN), Ribon, Roche (Genentech), Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda and Turning Point. J.E.G. reports honoraria: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Merck and OncoCyte; consulting or advisory role: AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Lilly, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Loxo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, AstraZeneca–MedImmune, Janssen Scientific Affairs, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, AbbVie and Regeneron; research funding: Merck (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Genentech (Roche) (Inst), G1 Therapeutics (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research (Inst), SWOG (Inst), Array BioPharma (Inst) and ECOG-ACRIN (Inst). N.L. reports CME and research funding: AstraZeneca. B.L. reports Genentech (Roche), Eli Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Janssen, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, Mirati, Novartis and Guardant 360. J.R.B. reports grant funding: AstraZeneca; advisory board: AstraZeneca, Amgen, Novartis, Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Janssen, Sanofi, Regeneron, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline; DSMB: Sanofi, Janssen and GlaxoSmithKline. M.C.G. reports AstraZeneca, Abion, MSD International, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim Italia S.p.A, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Seattle Genetics, Mirati, Daiichi Sankyo, Regeneron, Merck, Blueprint, Janssen, Sanofi, AbbVie, BeiGenius, Oncohost and Medscape. D.R.G. reports institutional research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Genentech and Merck; consultant or advisory board for Adagene, AstraZeneca, Roche (Genentech), Guardant, IO Biotech, Oncocyte, OncoHost, Lilly, Merck and Novartis. E.B.G. reports consulting or advisory role: Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Shionogi, Eisai, Bristol Myers Squibb, ABL Bio, Xilio Therapeutics, Natera, Sanofi–Regeneron, Lilly, Personalis, Gilead Sciences, AstraZeneca, AbbVie–Abbott, Arcus Biosciences, Seagan and Summit Therapeutics; research funding: Merck (Inst), Genentech (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Mirati Therapeutics (Inst), Dynavax Technologies (Inst), Iovance Biotherapeutics (Inst), Neon Therapeutics (Inst), EMD Serono (Inst), ABL Bio (Inst) and Daiichi Sankyo–UCB Japan (Inst); patents, royalties, other intellectual property: diagnosistic and therapeutic use of ‘Motif Neoepitopes’ as defined by Cummings et al.76. N.A.R. reports an employee at Synthekine and holds equity at Synthekine and Gritstone. G.V.S. reports honoraria, research funding and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene Switzerland, F. Hoffman–La Roche, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Takeda Oncology, Tesaro and Verastem outside the submitted work. J.W. reports advisory boards and lecture fees: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Ignyta, Janssen, Lilly, Loxo, Merck, Mirati, MSD (Merck Sharp & Dohme), Novartis, Nuvalent, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Takeda and Turning Point; research support (to institution): BMS, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and AstraZeneca. B.B. reports receiving grants from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Ellipse, EISAI, Genmab, Genzyme Corporation, Hedera Dx, Inivata, IPSEN, Janssen, MSD, PharmaMar, Roche (Genentech), Sanofi, Socar Research, Tahio Oncology and Turning Point Therapeutics. R.S.H. reports consulting roles with AbbVie Pharmaceuticals, ARMO Biosciences, AstraZeneca, Biodesix, Bolt Biotherapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cybrexa Therapeutics, eFFECTOR Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech (Roche), Genmab, Halozyme Therapeutics, Heat Biologics, I-Mab Biopharma, Immunocore, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Loxo Oncology, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, Nektar, Neon Therapeutics, NextCure, Novartis, Oncternal Therapeutics, Pfizer, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Shire, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, STCube Pharmaceuticals, Symphogen, Takeda, Tesaro, Tocagen and WindMIL Therapeutics; advisory board roles with AstraZeneca, Bolt Biotherapeutics, Cybrexa Therapeutics, EMD Serono, I-Mab Biopharma, Immunocore, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Neon Therapeutics, Novartis and STCube Pharmaceuticals; research support from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Genentech (Roche) and Merck; and non-executive board membership for Junshi Pharmaceuticals and Immunocore. H.A.W. reports grants or contracts from any entity: Bayer, Arrys Therapeutics, AstraZeneca–Medimmune, BMS, Clovis Oncology, Genentech (Roche), Merck, Novartis, Seagen, Xcovery and Helsinn; advisory board: Mirati, Merck and Genentech (Roche); leadership: International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), President; ECOG-ACRIN, executive committee. N.A.P. reports an employee at Synthekine and holds equity at Synthekine and Gritstone. A.T.S. is currently an employee of Novartis. P.A.J. reports stock and other ownership interests: Gatekeeper Pharmaceuticals and Loxo; consulting or advisory role: Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Merrimack, Chugai, Roche (Genentech), Loxo, Mirati Therapeutics, Araxes Pharma, Ignyta, Lilly, Takeda, Novartis, Biocartis, Voronoi Health Analytics, SFJ Pharmaceuticals Group, Sanofi, Daiichi Sankyo, Silicon Therapeutics, Nuvalent, Eisai, Bayer, Syndax, AbbVie, Allorion Therapeutics, Accutar Biotech, Transcenta, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Scorpion Therapeutics, Merus, Frontier Medicines, Hongyun Biotech and Duality Biologics; research funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Puma Biotechnology (Inst), Takeda (Inst) and Revolution Medicines (Inst); patents, royalties, other intellectual property: I am a co-inventor on a DFCI owned patent on EGFR mutations licensed to Lab Corp. I receive post-marketing royalties from this invention. D.P.C. reports advisory boards or consulting: Abbvie, Arcus Biosciences, AstraZeneca, BMS Israel, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, InThought, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Janssen, Jazz, JNJ, Merck–EMD Serono, Merck KGaA, Mirati, MSD, Novartis, Novocure, OncoHost, Pfizer Egypt, Regeneron, Roche and Sanofi; KOL/presentation/education/forum: AstraZeneca, Curio Science, Intellisphere, Merck US, OncLive, Pfizer, PPD Development and Roche Taiwan. M.D.H. is an employee of and stockholder in AstraZeneca. C.M.R. reports consulted regarding oncology drug development with AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, D2G, Daiichi Sankyo, Epizyme, Genentech (Roche), Ipsen, Jazz, Kowa, Lilly, Merck and Syros. He serves on the scientific advisory boards of Auron, Bridge Medicines, DISCO, Earli and Harpoon Therapeutics. L.A. is an employee of Foundation Medicine and a stockholder of Roche Holding AG. H.M. reports full-time employee of AstraZeneca and stock/shares. Z.Z. reports employee of AstraZeneca as well as stockholder of AstraZeneca and Pfizer. Z.L. reports full-time employee and stock owner of AstraZeneca. R.S. reports other support from AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study, as well as other support from Pfizer outside the submitted work. S.P. reports consultation or advisory role: AbbVie, Amgen, Arcus, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, BerGenBio, Biocartis, BioInvent, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eli Lilly, F-Star, Fishawack, Foundation Medicine, Genzyme, Gilead, GSK, Hutchmed, Illumina, Incyte, Ipsen, iTeos, Janssen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Merck Serono, Merrimack, Mirati, Nykode Therapeutics, Novartis, Novocure, PharmaMar, Promontory Therapeutics, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche (Genentech), Sanofi, Seattle Genetics and Takeda; Board of Directors position: Galenica; talk in a company’s organized public event: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Foundation Medicine, GSK, Illumina, Ipsen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Mirati, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche (Genentech), Sanofi and Takeda; receipt of grants or research support: principal investigator in trials (institutional financial support for clinical trials) sponsored by Amgen, Arcus, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, iTeos, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Mirati, PharmaMar, Promontory Therapeutics, Roche (Genentech) and Seattle Genetics. J.M.J. and M.J.R. are employees and shareholders of D2G Oncology. I.P.W. is a co-founder, employee and shareholder of D2G Oncology. M.M.W. is a co-founder, shareholder, member of the board of directors and compensated scientific advisor of D2G Oncology. I.P.W. and M.M.W. are co-inventors of patents relating to technologies for an autochthonous mouse model of human cancer, which D2G Oncology has exclusively licensed from Stanford University. V.A.P. reports Pfizer employee and stockholder. K.K.W. is a founder and equity holder of G1 Therapeutics and has sponsored research agreements with Takeda, TargImmune, Bristol Myers Squibb, Mirati, Merus and Alkermes, and consulting and sponsored research agreements with AstraZeneca, Janssen, Pfizer, Novartis, Merck, Zentalis, BridgeBio and Blueprint. P.J. reports employee and stock or stock options of AstraZeneca. I.I.W. reports honoraria from Genentech (Roche), Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Merck, Guardant Health, Flame, Novartis, Sanofi, Daiichi Sankyo, Amgen, Janssen, Merus, G1 Therapeutics, Abbvie, Catalyst Therapeutics, Regeneron, Oncocyte, Medscape, Platform Health and Physicians’ Education Resources; research support from Genentech, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Medimmune, Adaptive, Adaptimmune, EMD Serono, Pfizer, Takeda, Amgen, Karus, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer, Iovance, 4D, Novartis and Akoya. A.G.P. reports Pfizer. J.V.H. reports Advisory Committees: Genentech, Mirati Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Regeneron, Takeda, BerGenBio, Jazz, Curio Science, Novartis, AstraZeneca, BioAlta, Sanofi, Spectrum, GlaxoSmithKline, EMD Serono, BluePrint Medicine and Chugai; research support: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Spectrum, Mirati, Bristol Myers Squibb and Takeda; licensing or royalties: Spectrum. H.A.A., M.T.D., A.G.C., Y.Q., R.P., D.M., D.H.O., R.M., J.A.H., L.M., S.C.M.L., R.P.J., C.L., Z.W., M.G.W., D.V., H.S., M.K., S.K., Y.N., J.T.A., J.S., L.L., H.N.K., B.C., S.S., R.L., T.Z., J.J.L., D.P., M.L.J. T.T., A.P., Y.K. and J.L.: no disclosures were reported by these authors., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Dermatologic manifestations of diseases in solid organ transplant recipients are common due to long-term immunosuppression., Case Presentation: We present the case of a 63-year-old man with a kidney transplant who exhibited subcutaneous nodules on lower extremities, cytopenia, and asymptomatic pulmonary infiltrate. Through a skin biopsy and 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing, Mycobacterium haemophilum was identified. His clinical course was complicated by empyema, septic arthritis, and recurrence of his skin manifestations, despite ongoing antimicrobial treatment., Discussion: This case emphasizes the challenges and potential complications associated with M haemophilum infections in solid organ transplant recipients receiving long-term immunosuppressive therapy. It highlights the importance of employing advanced diagnostic techniques when evaluating dermatologic manifestations in these patients. The patient's complex clinical course also underscores the difficulties involved in effectively addressing and managing complications that may arise even after initiating therapy., (Copyright© Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System and The Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc.)

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recognized the need for a research program to address the underlying structural factors that impact health. To inform the development of the NIH Common Fund Community Partnerships to Advance Science for Society (ComPASS) Program, NIH obtained input through community listening sessions. Through its design, ComPASS recognizes the essential role of community organizations as the lead in addressing persistent structural and social challenges to accelerate progress toward advancing health equity. ( Am J Public Health . 2024;114(7):685-689. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307656).

Background The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent guidelines have had a substantial effect on social norms. This likely affected self-report assessment of psychopathology, namely those that assess obsessive-compulsive tendencies routinely used to screen for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). It was hypothesized that self-report assessment of OCD likely produces inflated, non-discriminating scale scores. Methods Data collection occurred prior to the COVID-19 pandemic with the aim of validating a new psychological test; however, data collection was abruptly halted in March 2020. Data collection was allowed to resume in the latter half of the year. Both groups were racio-ethnically and gender diverse. Results Self-report measures of OCD yielded inflated scores. For instance, the total obsessive-compulsive inventory-revised (OCI-R) average score of all participants went from normative levels prior to COVID-19 (M = 13.69, SD = 10.32) to an average score that was above the clinical cut-off on the OCI-R (M = 32.89; SD = 12.95) during the pandemic (t(135) = 9.66, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.66). Conclusions OCD-related scale scores likely produced false positives in research and practice due to COVID-19 health guidelines put in place to protect against infection that may otherwise be considered contamination fears on OCD measures., Competing Interests: The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section., (Copyright © 2024, Meza et al.)

The analysis of action potentials and other membrane voltage fluctuations provides a powerful approach for interrogating the function of excitable cells. However, a major bottleneck in the interpretation of this critical data is the lack of intuitive, agreed-upon software tools for its analysis. Here, we present SanPy, an open-source and freely available software package for the analysis and exploration of whole-cell current-clamp recordings written in Python. SanPy provides a robust computational engine with an application programming interface. Using this, we have developed a cross-platform desktop application with a graphical user interface that does not require programming. SanPy is designed to extract common parameters from action potentials, including threshold time and voltage, peak, half-width, and interval statistics. In addition, several cardiac parameters are measured, including the early diastolic duration and rate. SanPy is built to be fully extensible by providing a plugin architecture for the addition of new file loaders, analysis, and visualizations. A key feature of SanPy is its focus on quality control and data exploration. In the desktop interface, all plots of the data and analysis are linked, allowing simultaneous data visualization from different dimensions with the goal of obtaining ground-truth analysis. We provide documentation for all aspects of SanPy, including several use cases and examples. To test SanPy, we performed analysis on current-clamp recordings from heart and brain cells. Taken together, SanPy is a powerful tool for whole-cell current-clamp analysis and lays the foundation for future extension by the scientific community., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Stimuli associated with rewards can acquire the ability to capture our attention independently of our goals and intentions. Here, we examined whether attentional prioritisation of reward-related cues is sensitive to changes in the value of the reward itself. To this end, we incorporated an instructed outcome devaluation (Experiment 1a), "super-valuation" (Experiment 1b), or value switch (Experiment 2) into a visual search task, using eye-tracking to examine attentional prioritisation of stimuli signalling high- and low-value rewards. In Experiments 1a and 1b, we found that prioritisation of high- and low-value stimuli was insensitive to devaluation of a previously high-value outcome, and super-valuation of a previously low-value outcome, even when participants were provided with further experience of receiving that outcome. In Experiment 2, following a value-switch manipulation, we found that prioritisation of a high-value stimulus could not be overcome with knowledge of the new values of outcomes alone. Only when provided with further experience of receiving the outcomes did patterns of attentional prioritisation of high- and low-value stimuli switch, in line with the updated values of the outcomes they signalled. To reconcile these findings, we suggest that participants were motivated to engage in effortful updating of attentional control settings when there was a relative difference between reward values at test (Experiment 2) but that previous settings were allowed to persist when both outcomes had the same value at test (Experiments 1a and 1b). These findings provide a novel framework to further understand the role of cognitive control in driving reward-modulated attention and behaviour., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Pre-surgical psychological assessments are becoming common in the United States and are recommended or required prior to surgical/spinal cord stimulator intervention for chronic back pain. Psychological testing is often recommended for these evaluations and the various versions of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) have demonstrated utility for predicting outcomes in this setting. This investigation sought to extend that literature with the newest version of the MMPI, the MMPI-3. The sample comprised of 909 patients (50.5% men, 49.5% women) who consented to participating in an outcome study and took the MMPI-3 along with other self-report measures of pain, functional disability, and emotional functioning prior to surgery as part of their pre-surgical psychological assessment. Self-report measures of pain, functional disability, and emotional functioning were administered again one-year following the intervention. MMPI-3 scale scores accounted for up to 9% of additional variance in the outcomes after controlling for pre-surgical measures. Measures of emotional/internalizing dysfunction, somatic dysfunction, and, to a lesser extent, behavioral/externalizing dysfunction contributed the most to the prediction of poorer outcomes., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: The goal of this study is to describe the change in utilization of mental health services by trainees at a private medical college in Wisconsin after specific interventions were instituted by the administration., Methods: Multiphase interventions designed to increase access to care were instituted at the student behavioral health clinic. These interventions were based on the findings of online wellness surveys distributed to the Medical College of Wisconsin during the 2016-2017 school year. The authors collected annual utilization reports of student use of mental health services at the Medical College of Wisconsin and plotted them along a timeline of specific administrative interventions., Results: Since the 2016-2017 academic year, medical students have used an average of 1274 mental health service visits per year compared to 637 visits annually during the academic years 2010-2011 through 2015-2016. The number of mental health visits increased significantly during 2016-2017 versus the average number of visits in previous years ( P  < 001; Cohen's d  = 4.39)., Discussion: Similar to results shown worldwide, medical students in Wisconsin experience diminished mental health relative to their nonmedical peers. Recommendations have been made to provide additional administrative support to provide increased mental health resources to medical trainees. The findings in this report imply that incorporation of recommendations from the stakeholder medical trainees may be a key feature in the successful design and implementation of these supports., (Copyright© Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System and The Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc.)

Background: Metabolic and bariatric surgery is effective for sustained weight loss, but binge eating disorder (BED) can be associated with poorer outcomes and lead to weight regain. A common measure used to screen for BED is the Binge Eating Scale (BES). A BES cut-off score of ≥17 previously identified patients who have a high likelihood of meeting criteria for BED. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), lowered the threshold for meeting criteria for BED, and the psychometrics of the BES need to be reevaluated., Objective: The objective of the current investigation is to evaluate whether alternative cut-scores on the BES result in better classification of BED based on the DSM-5 revision of the the BED diagnostic criteria., Setting: Academic medical hospital in the Midwestern United States., Methods: Patients (n =1133) seeking metabolic and bariatric surgery were randomly split into 2 samples for validation and replication. The validation sample consisted of 561 patients (30.1% men, 35% non-White). The replication sample consisted of 572 patients who were demographically similar to the first random split sample (e.g., 25.3% men, 34.4% non-White)., Results: Of these patients, 13.5% met DSM-5 criteria for BED in the validation sample and 13.8% met criteria for BED in the replication sample. Lowering the interpretative cut-off to ≥15 on the BES yielded sensitivity values of >.72, specificity values of >.67, and an accurate classification of BED in >.70 of patients across both samples. These classification values were as good as or better than the standard cut-off score of ≥17 in both samples., Conclusions: The BES is appropriate to screen for BED in patients who are seeking bariatric surgery. A 2-point decrease in the BES score for clinical interpretation is appropriate-lowering it from 17 to 15 given DSM-5 updates to diagnostic criteria., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Primary angle-closure glaucoma is a type of glaucoma associated with a physically obstructed anterior chamber angle. For example, contact between the iris and lens at the pupillary margin creates a pupillary block that increases resistance to aqueous outflow. Obstruction of the anterior chamber angle blocks drainage of fluids (aqueous humor) within the eye and may raise intraocular pressure (IOP). Elevated IOP is associated with glaucomatous optic nerve damage and visual field loss. Laser peripheral iridotomy ('iridotomy') is a procedure to eliminate pupillary block by allowing aqueous humor to pass directly from the posterior to anterior chamber, which is achieved by creating a hole in the iris using laser. Iridotomy is used to treat patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma, patients with primary angle-closure (narrow angles and no signs of glaucomatous optic neuropathy), and patients who are primary angle-closure suspects (patients with reversible obstruction). However, the effectiveness of iridotomy on slowing progression of visual field loss is uncertain., Objectives: To assess the effects of iridotomy compared with no iridotomy for primary angle-closure glaucoma, primary angle-closure, and primary angle-closure suspect., Search Methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2021, Issue 10), which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; MEDLINE Ovid; Embase Ovid; PubMed; LILACS; ClinicalTrials.gov; and the WHO ICTRP. The date of the most recent search was 10 October 2021., Selection Criteria: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that compared iridotomy with no iridotomy in primary angle-closure suspects, people with primary angle-closure, or people with primary angle-closure glaucoma in one or both eyes were eligible., Data Collection and Analysis: We used standard Cochrane methodology and assessed the certainty of the body of evidence for prespecified outcomes using the GRADE approach., Main Results: We identified four studies (3086 eyes of 1543 participants) that compared iridotomy with no iridotomy in participants (range of mean age 59.6 to 62.9 years) who were primary angle-closure suspects from China, Singapore, or the UK. Study investigators randomized one eye of each participant to iridotomy and the other to no iridotomy. Two studies provided long-term (five or more years) results. We judged the certainty of the evidence as moderate to low across the prespecified outcomes, downgrading for high risk of bias (e.g. performance and detection biases) and imprecision of results. Meta-analyses of data from two studies suggest that iridotomy probably results in little to no difference in IOP compared with no iridotomy at one year (mean difference (MD) 0.04 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.17 to 0.24; I 2 = 65%; 2598 eyes of 1299 participants; moderate certainty evidence) and five years (MD 0.12 mm Hg, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.35; I 2 = 0%; 2016 eyes of 1008 participants), and in best-corrected visual acuity measured as logMAR at one year (MD 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01; I 2 = 69%; 2596 eyes of 1298 participants; moderate certainty evidence) and five years (MD 0.01, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.03; I 2 = 0%; 2002 eyes of 1001 participants). In terms of gonioscopic findings, eyes treated with iridotomy likely had wider angles in Shaffer grading scale (MD 4.93 units, 95% CI 4.73 to 5.12; I 2 = 59%; 2598 eyes of 1299 participants at one year; MD 5.07, 95% CI 4.78 to 5.36; I 2 = 97%; 2016 eyes of 1008 participants at five years; moderate certainty evidence) and experienced fewer peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) than eyes that received no iridotomy at five years (risk ratio (RR) 0.41, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.67; I 2 = 28%; 2 studies, 2738 eyes of 1369 participants), but the evidence was less conclusive at one year (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.54; I 2 = 57%; 3 studies, 2896 eyes of 1448 participants; low certainty evidence). No studies reported data on the proportion of participants with progressive visual field loss during follow-up (the primary outcome of this review), mean number of medications to control IOP, or quality of life outcomes. Low certainty evidence suggests that iridotomy may result in little to no difference in the incidence of acute angle-closure (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.20; I 2 = 0%; 3 studies, 3006 eyes of 1503 participants). Other ocular adverse events (e.g. eye pain, dry eye, redness of eyes, and ocular discomfort), although rare, were more common in eyes treated with iridotomy than in eyes in the control group.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We did not find sufficient evidence to draw any meaningful conclusions on the use of iridotomy for the purpose of slowing progression of visual field loss. No study reported on progressive visual field loss, the primary outcome of this review. Although there is moderate certainty evidence that iridotomy results in improved gonioscopic findings, in is unclear if these findings translate to clinically meaningful benefits., (Copyright © 2023 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) are often characterized as a cluster of brain-based disabilities. Though cardiovascular effects of prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) have been documented, the vascular deficits due to PAE are less understood, but may contribute substantially to the severity of neurobehavioral presentation and health outcomes in persons with FASD., Methods: We conducted a systematic review of research articles curated in PubMed to assess the strength of the research on vascular effects of PAE. 40 pertinent papers were selected, covering studies in both human populations and animal models., Results: Studies in human populations identified cardiac defects, and defects in vasculature, including increased tortuosity, defects in basement membranes, capillary basal hyperplasia, endarteritis, and disorganized and diminished cerebral vasculature due to PAE. Preclinical studies showed that PAE rapidly and persistently results in vasodilation of large afferent cerebral arteries, but to vasoconstriction of smaller cerebral arteries and microvasculature. Moreover, PAE continues to affect cerebral blood flow into middle-age. Human and animal studies also indicate that ocular vascular parameters may have diagnostic and predictive value. A number of intervening mechanisms were identified, including increased autophagy, inflammation and deficits in mitochondria. Studies in animals identified persistent changes in blood flow and vascular density associated with endocannabinoid, prostacyclin and nitric oxide signaling, as well as calcium mobilization., Conclusion: Although the brain has been a particular focus of studies on PAE, the cardiovascular system is equally affected. Studies in human populations, though constrained by small sample sizes, did link pathology in major blood vessels and tissue vasculature, including brain vasculature, to PAE. Animal studies highlighted molecular mechanisms that may be useful therapeutic targets. Collectively, these studies suggest that vascular pathology is a possible contributing factor to neurobehavioral and health problems across a lifespan in persons with a diagnosis of FASD. Furthermore, ocular vasculature may serve as a biomarker for neurovascular health in FASD.

Objective: Our goal was to determine whether animals with a history of epileptic spasms have learning and memory deficits. We also used continuous (24/7) long-term electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings to evaluate the evolution of epileptiform activity in the same animals over time., Methods: Object recognition memory and object location memory tests were undertaken, as well as a matching to place water maze test that evaluated working memory. A retrospective analysis was undertaken of long-term video/EEG recordings from rats with epileptic spasms. The frequency and duration of the ictal events of spasms were quantified., Results: Rats with a history of epileptic spasms showed impairment on the three behavioral tests, and their scores on the object recognition memory and matching to place water maze tests indicated neocortical involvement in the observed impaired cognition. Analysis of EEG recordings unexpectedly showed that the ictal events of spasms and their accompanying behaviors progressively increased in duration over a 2-week period soon after onset, after which spasm duration plateaued. At the same time, spasm frequency remained unchanged. Soon after spasm onset, ictal events were variable in wave form but became more stereotyped as the syndrome evolved., Significance: Our EEG findings are the first to demonstrate progressive ictogenesis for epileptic spasms. Furthermore, in demonstrating cognitive deficits in the tetrodotoxin model, we have met a criterion for an animal model of West syndrome. Animal models will allow in-depth studies of spasm progression's potential role in cognitive regression and may elucidate why early treatment is considered essential for improved neurodevelopmental outcomes in children., (© 2022 International League Against Epilepsy.)

Recent meta-analyses have demonstrated that data from female rodents, tested without regard for estrous stage, is no more variable than male data across a range of traits. Nonetheless, widespread use of male-only samples persists in preclinical studies of anxiety disorders, despite this condition being twice more prevalent amongst women relative to men. We conducted a meta-analysis of over 4900 data points obtained from 263 articles assessing behavioural measures of fear and anxiety in rodents. We found no evidence for greater female variability on any measure. Overall, males had greater variability than unstaged females, which was predominantly driven by studies of learned fear. Compared to unstaged females, staged, but not ovariectomised, females showed reduced variability. Experiments using individual housing and rats were associated with greater variability relative to those using group housing and mice; these effects were not moderated by sex. These results illustrate that the estrous cycle does not inflate variability in females beyond that of males, despite being a female-specific modulator of fear and anxiety behaviour., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Deep-sea images are routinely collected during at-sea expeditions and represent a repository of under-utilized knowledge. We leveraged dive videos collected by the remotely-operated vehicle Hercules (deployed from E/V Nautilus, operated by the Ocean Exploration Trust), and adapted biological trait analysis, to develop an approach that characterizes ecosystem services. Specifically, fisheries and climate-regulating services related to carbon are assessed for three southern California methane seeps: Point Dume (∼725 m), Palos Verdes (∼506 m), and Del Mar (∼1023 m). Our results enable qualitative intra-site comparisons that suggest seep activity influences ecosystem services differentially among sites, and site-to-site comparisons that suggest the Del Mar site provides the highest relative contributions to fisheries and carbon services. This study represents a first step towards ecosystem services characterization and quantification using deep-sea images. The results presented herein are foundational, and continued development should help guide research and management priorities by identifying potential sources of ecosystem services., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: We aimed to investigate bidirectional associations between cognitive impairment and late age-related macular degeneration (AMD)., Methods: Participants in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) received annual eye examinations and cognitive function testing (e.g., Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status [TICS-M]). We examined bidirectional associations between cognitive impairment (e.g., a TICS-M score < 30) and late AMD at 5 and 10 years., Results: Five thousand one hundred eighty-nine eyes (3157 participants; mean age 72.7 years) were analyzed and followed for a median of 10.4 years. Eyes of participants with cognitive impairment at baseline were more likely to progress to late AMD at 5 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.43) and 10 years (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05-1.37) than eyes of participants without cognitive impairment. Worse baseline AMD severity was not associated with developing cognitive impairment., Discussion: Cognitive impairment is associated with late AMD progression in AREDS2. Our finding highlights the importance of eyecare for people with cognitive impairment., (© 2021 the Alzheimer's Association.)

Objective: Infantile spasms are associated with a wide variety of clinical conditions, including perinatal brain injuries. We have created a model in which prolonged infusion of tetrodotoxin (TTX) into the neocortex, beginning in infancy, produces a localized lesion and reproduces the behavioral spasms, electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities, and drug responsiveness seen clinically. Here, we undertook experiments to explore the possibility that the growth factor IGF-1 plays a role in generating epileptic spasms., Methods: We combined long-term video EEG recordings with quantitative immunohistochemical and biochemical analyses to unravel IGF-1's role in spasm generation. Immunohistochemistry was undertaken in surgically resected tissue from infantile spasms patients. We used viral injections in neonatal conditional IGF-1R knock-out mice to show that an IGF-1-derived tripeptide (1-3)IGF-1, acts through the IGF-1 receptor to abolish spasms., Results: Immunohistochemical methods revealed widespread loss of IGF-1 from cortical neurons, but an increase in IGF-1 in the reactive astrocytes in the TTX-induced lesion. Very similar changes were observed in the neocortex from patients with spasms. In animals, we observed reduced signaling through the IGF-1 growth pathways in areas remote from the lesion. To show the reduction in IGF-1 expression plays a role in spasm generation, epileptic rats were treated with (1-3)IGF-1. We provide 3 lines of evidence that (1-3)IGF-1 activates the IGF-1 signaling pathway by acting through the receptor for IGF-1. Treatment with (1-3)IGF-1 abolished spasms and hypsarrhythmia-like activity in the majority of animals., Interpretation: Results implicate IGF-1 in the pathogenesis of infantile spasms and IGF-1 analogues as potential novel therapies for this neurodevelopmental disorder. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:45-60., (© 2022 American Neurological Association.)

Deep-sea biodiversity, a source of critical ecological functions and ecosystem services, is increasingly subject to the threat of disturbance from existing practices (e.g., fishing, waste disposal, oil and gas extraction) as well as emerging industries such as deep-seabed mining. Current scientific tools may not be adequate for monitoring and assessing subsequent changes to biodiversity. In this paper, we evaluate the scientific and budgetary trade-offs associated with morphology-based taxonomy and metabarcoding approaches to biodiversity surveys in the context of nascent deep-seabed mining for polymetallic nodules in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone, the area of most intense interest. For the dominant taxa of benthic meiofauna, we discuss the types of information produced by these methods and use cost-effectiveness analysis to compare their abilities to yield biological and ecological data for use in environmental assessment and management. On the basis of our evaluation, morphology-based taxonomy is less cost-effective than metabarcoding but offers scientific advantages, such as the generation of density, biomass, and size structure data. Approaches that combine the two methods during the environmental assessment phase of commercial activities may facilitate future biodiversity monitoring and assessment for deep-seabed mining and for other activities in remote deep-sea habitats, for which taxonomic data and expertise are limited. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:655-663. © 2021 SETAC., (© 2021 SETAC.)

Background: The functional movement screen (FMS™) and Y-balance test (YBT) are commonly used to evaluate mobility in athletes., Purpose: The primary aim of this investigation was to determine the relationship between demographic and anthropometric factors such as sex, body composition, and skeletal dimension and scoring on YBT and FMS™ in male and female professional soccer athletes., Study Design: Cross Sectional., Methods: During pre-season assessments, athletes from two professional soccer clubs were recruited and underwent body composition and skeletal dimension analysis via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans. Balance and mobility were assessed using the YBT and FMS™. A two-tailed t-test was used to compare YBT between sexes. Chi-square was used for sex comparisons of FMS™ scores. Correlation analysis was used to determine if body composition and/or skeletal dimensions correlated with YBT or FMS™ measures. Type-I error; α=0.05., Results: 40 Participants were successfully recruited: (24 males: 27±5yr, 79±9kg; |16 females: 25±3yr, 63±4kg). YBT: Correlations were found between anterior reach and height (r=-0.36), total lean mass (LM)(r=-0.39), and trunk LM(r=-0.39) as well as between posterolateral reach and pelvic width (PW)(r=0.42), femur length (r=0.44), and tibia length (r=0.51)(all p<0.05). FMS™: The deep squat score was correlated with height(r=-0.40), PW(r=0.40), LM(r=-0.43), and trunk LM (r =-0.40)(p<0.05). Inline lunge scores were correlated with height(r=-0.63), PW(r=0.60), LM(r=-0.77), trunk LM(r=-0.73), and leg LM(r=0.70)(all p<0.05). Straight leg raise scores were correlated with PW (r=0.45, p<0.05). Females scored higher for the three lower body FMS™ measures where correlations were observed (p<0.05)., Conclusions: Lower body FMS™ scores differ between male and female professional soccer athletes and are related to anthropometric factors that may influence screening and outcomes for the FMS™ and YBT, respectively. Thus, these anatomical factors likely need to be taken into account when assessing baseline performance and risk of injury to improve screening efficacy., Level of Evidence: Level 3b., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose and no funding support was provided for the work presented in this manuscript.

Background: The use of translaminar screws may serve as a viable salvage method for complicated cases. To our understanding, the study of the feasibility of translaminar screw insertion in the actual entire subaxial cervical spine has not been carried out yet. The purpose of this study was to report the feasibility of translaminar screw insertion in the entire subaxial cervical spine., Methods: Eighteen cadaveric spines were harvested from C3 to C7 and 1-mm computed tomography (CT) scans and three-dimensional reconstructions were created to exclude any bony anomaly. Thirty anatomically intact segments were collected (C3, 2; C4, 3; C5, 3; C6, 8; and C7, 14), and randomly arranged. Twenty-one segments were physically separated at each vertebral level (group S), while 9 segments were not separated from the vertebral column and left in situ (group N-S). CT measurement of lamina thickness was done for both group S and group N-S, and manual measurement of various length and angle was done for group S only. Using the trajectory proposed by the previous studies, translaminar screws were placed at each level. Screw diameter was the same or 0.5 mm larger than the proposed diameter based on CT measurement. Post-insertion CT was performed. Cortical breakage was checked either visually or by CT., Results: When 1° and 2° screws of the same size were used, medial cortex breakage was found 13% and 33% of the time, respectively. C7 was relatively safer than the other levels. With larger-sized screws, medial cortex breakage was found in 47% and 46% of 1° and 2° screws, respectively. There were no facet injuries due to the screws in group N-S., Conclusions: Translaminar screw insertion in the subaxial cervical spine is feasible only when the lamina is thick enough to avoid any breakage that could lead to further complications. The authors do not recommend inserting translaminar screws in the subaxial cervical spine except in some salvage cases in the presence of a thick lamina., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (Copyright © 2022 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association.)

Introduction: Pneumatic tourniquets are used extensively in orthopedic hand/wrist surgery. Complications, while rare, are associated with elevated pressure and duration of tourniquet use. Limb occlusion pressure (LOP) is the minimum tourniquet pressure at which arterial blood flow is restricted. Therefore, we performed a cross-sectional double-blinded randomized control trial to assess if there is a difference in post-operative pain at the surgical and tourniquet site between LOP and standard tourniquet pressure and if there is a difference in post-operative opioid usage., Methods: A total of 44 patients (Age 60±13, 30 female, 14 male) were randomized into two groups (LOP, 191±14 mmHg | STP, 250 mmHg) of 22 patients controlling for gender (15 female, seven male). The primary outcome was a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at the tourniquet and surgical sites, recorded for the first two weeks post-operative. Daily pain medication usage was recorded and quantified using oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME). A group-by-time generalized mixed-model ANOVA was used to detect within-group and between group (LOP vs STP) differences in VAS at the surgical and tourniquet sites as well as medication use.  Results: LOP significantly decreased post-operative pain medication usage across the first week (-50%; p<0.05). Both groups had similar VAS pain at the surgery site, but the LOP group had 80% reduced pain at the tourniquet site when averaged across the first post-operative week (p<0.05).  Conclusions: The use of LOP compared to STP elicits reduced post-operative pain at the tourniquet site and reduces post-operative pain medication use in the first post-operative week., Competing Interests: The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section., (Copyright © 2021, Morehouse et al.)

Importance: Glaucoma affects more than 75 million people worldwide. Intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering surgery is an important treatment for this disease. Interest in reducing surgical morbidity has led to the introduction of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS). Understanding the comparative effectiveness and safety of MIGS is necessary for clinicians and patients., Objective: To summarize data from randomized clinical trials of MIGS for open-angle glaucoma, which were evaluated in a suite of Cochrane reviews., Data Sources: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews including studies published before June 1, 2021., Study Selection: Reviews of randomized clinical trials comparing MIGS with cataract extraction alone, other MIGS, traditional glaucoma surgery, laser trabeculoplasty, or medical therapy., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines by one investigator and confirmed by a second. Methodologic rigor was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 appraisal tool and random-effects network meta-analyses were conducted., Main Outcomes and Measures: The proportion of participants who did not need to use medication to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) postsurgery (drop-free). Outcomes were analyzed at short-term (<6 months), medium-term (6-18 months), and long-term (>18 months) follow-up., Results: Six eligible Cochrane reviews were identified discussing trabecular bypass with iStent or Hydrus microstents, ab interno trabeculotomy with Trabectome, subconjunctival and supraciliary drainage devices, and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation. Moderate certainty evidence indicated that adding a Hydrus safely improved the likelihood of drop-free glaucoma control at medium-term (relative risk [RR], 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 1.8) and long-term (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 1.9) follow-up and conferred 2.0-mm Hg (95% CI, -2.7 to -1.3 mm Hg) greater IOP reduction at long-term follow-up, compared with cataract surgery alone. Adding an iStent also safely improved drop-free disease control compared with cataract surgery alone (RR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.6), but the short-term IOP-lowering effect of the iStent was not sustained. Addition of a CyPass microstent improved drop-free glaucoma control compared with cataract surgery alone (RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.5) but was associated with an increased risk of vraision loss. Network meta-analyses supported the direction and magnitude of these results., Conclusions and Relevance: Based on data synthesized in Cochrane reviews, some MIGS may afford patients with glaucoma greater drop-free disease control than cataract surgery alone. Among the products currently available, randomized clinical trial data associate the Hydrus with greater drop-free glaucoma control and IOP lowering than the iStent; however, these effect sizes were small.

Objective: Epileptic spasms are a hallmark of a severe epileptic state. A previous study showed neocortical up and down states defined by unit activity play a role in the generation of spasms. However, recording unit activity is challenging in clinical settings, and more accessible neurophysiological signals are needed for the analysis of these brain states., Methods: In the tetrodotoxin model, we used 16-channel microarrays to record electrophysiological activity in the neocortex during interictal periods and spasms. High-frequency activity (HFA) in the frequency range of fast ripples (200-500 Hz) was analyzed, as were slow wave oscillations (1-8 Hz), and correlated with the neocortical up and down states defined by multiunit activity (MUA)., Results: HFA and MUA had high temporal correlation during interictal and ictal periods. Both increased strikingly during interictal up states and ictal events but were silenced during interictal down states and preictal pauses, and their distributions were clustered at the peak of slow oscillations in local field potential recordings. In addition, both HFA power and MUA firing rates were increased to a greater extent during spasms than interictal up states. During non-rapid eye movement sleep, the HFA rhythmicity faithfully followed the MUA up and down states, but during rapid eye movement sleep when MUA up and down states disappeared the HFA rhythmicity was largely absent. We also observed an increase in the number of HFA down state minutes prior to ictal onset, consistent with the results from analyses of MUA down states., Significance: This study provides evidence that HFA may serve as a biomarker for the pathological up states of epileptic spasms. The availability of HFA recordings makes this a clinically practical technique. These findings will likely provide a novel approach for localizing and studying epileptogenic neocortical networks not only in spasms patients but also in other types of epilepsy., (© 2021 International League Against Epilepsy.)

Laboratory stress-induction procedures have been critical in illuminating the effects of stress on human health, cognition, and functioning. Here, we present a novel stress induction procedure, the Simple Singing Stress Procedure (SSSP), that overcomes some of the practical challenges and conceptual limitations of existing procedures in measuring the causal influence of stress on psychological variables. In the stress condition of the SSSP, participants were instructed to sing a song in front of the experimenter while being video- and audio-recorded. Participants were also informed that they would have to sing again at the end of the experiment, and that this second performance would later be assessed by a panel of experimenters. Participants in a no-stress condition instead read lyrics in each phase. Our findings revealed that participants in the stress condition showed significantly higher blood pressure immediately following the initial singing session, as well as heightened salivary cortisol at a latency consistent with the initial singing session, than those in the no-stress condition. Our stress procedure also generated elevations in self-reported stress ratings immediately after the first singing session and subsequently in anticipation of the second singing session, relative to the no-stress condition. Collectively, these findings suggest that the SSSP is a simple and effective stress induction procedure that may be a promising alternative to existing protocols., (© 2020. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.)

Studies were undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of Acthar® Gel (repository corticotropin injection [RCI]) in the tetrodotoxin (TTX) model of early-life-induced epileptic spasms. Repository corticotropin injection (RCI) is widely used in the United States to treat infantile spasms. A major component of RCI is N25 deamidated ACTH. Additionally, we hoped to provide some insight into the possible role circulating corticosteroids play in spasm cessation by comparing the RCI dose-response relationships for spasm suppression to RCI-induced corticosterone release from the adrenal gland. Spasms were induced by chronic TTX infusion into the neocortex beginning on postnatal day 11. Repository corticotropin injection (RCI) dosages were between 8 and 32 IU/kg/day. Drug titration protocols were used, and comparisons were made to injections of a vehicle gel. Video/EEG recordings (24/7) monitored the drug's effects continuously for up to 2 months. Tetrodotoxin (TTX)-infused control rats were monitored for the same period of time. In separate experiments, the same dosages of RCI were given to rats and 1 h later plasma was collected and assayed for corticosterone. A parallel study compared the effects of 1-day and 10-day RCI treatments on circulating corticosterone. Results showed that RCI was ineffective at dosages of 8, 12, and 16 IU/kg/day but eliminated spasms in 66% of animals treated with 24 or 32 IU/kg/day. Treating animals with 32 IU/kg/day alone produced the same degree of spasms suppression as observed during the titration protocols. In rats that had hypsarrhythmia-like activity, RCI eliminated this abnormal interictal EEG pattern in all rats that became seizure-free. In terms of plasma corticosterone, 1- and 10-day treatments with RCI produced similar increases in this hormone and the levels increased linearly with increasing dosages of RCI. This stood in sharp contrast to the sigmoid-like dose-response curve for decreases in spasm counts. Our results further validate the TTX model as relevant for the study of infantile spasms. The model should be useful for investigating how RCI acts to eliminate seizures and hypsarrhythmia. Dose-response results suggest that either very high concentrations of circulating corticosteroids are required to abolish spasms or RCI acts through a different mechanism., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Epileptic spasms are a hallmark of severe seizure disorders. The neurophysiological mechanisms and the neuronal circuit(s) that generate these seizures are unresolved and are the focus of studies reported here., Methods: In the tetrodotoxin model, we used 16-channel microarrays and microwires to record electrophysiological activity in neocortex and thalamus during spasms. Chemogenetic activation was used to examine the role of neocortical pyramidal cells in generating spasms. Comparisons were made to recordings from infantile spasm patients., Results: Current source density and simultaneous multiunit activity analyses indicate that the ictal events of spasms are initiated in infragranular cortical layers. A dramatic pause of neuronal activity was recorded immediately prior to the onset of spasms. This preictal pause is shown to share many features with the down states of slow wave sleep. In addition, the ensuing interictal up states of slow wave rhythms are more intense in epileptic than control animals and occasionally appear sufficient to initiate spasms. Chemogenetic activation of neocortical pyramidal cells supported these observations, as it increased slow oscillations and spasm numbers and clustering. Recordings also revealed a ramp-up in the number of neocortical slow oscillations preceding spasms, which was also observed in infantile spasm patients., Interpretation: Our findings provide evidence that epileptic spasms can arise from the neocortex and reveal a previously unappreciated interplay between brain state physiology and spasm generation. The identification of neocortical up states as a mechanism capable of initiating epileptic spasms will likely provide new targets for interventional therapies. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:226-241., (© 2020 American Neurological Association.)

Renal transplant recipients are at an increased risk of atypical nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections. Infections caused by NTM are uncommon in the general population, rarely occurring in immunocompetent individuals. NTM infections are an uncommon cause of tenosynovitis. Mycobacterium marseillense is a rare, atypical mycobacteria that has been reported to cause pulmonary and cutaneous infections; however, no previous reports of this pathogen causing tenosynovitis exist. This case reports a 73-year-old male renal transplant recipient who presented with chronic extensor tenosynovitis of the right hand caused by M marseillense. The patient was treated with radical extensor tenosynovectomy and 6 months of antibiotic treatment. A review of literature on tenosynovitis caused by atypical mycobacteria was performed. The patient successfully responded to treatment with no complications or recurrence of infection at the 18-month follow-up. Tenosynovitis of the hand caused by atypical mycobacteria is rare. A high index of suspicion is required to prevent a delay in diagnosis, particularly in immunocompromised individuals., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: Transthyretin and immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidoses cause amyloid deposition throughout various organ systems. Recent evidence suggests that soft tissue amyloid deposits may lead to orthopedic conditions before cardiac manifestations occur. Pharmacologic treatments reduce further amyloid deposits in these patients. Thus, early diagnosis improves long term survival., Questions/purposes: The primary purpose of this systematic review was to characterize the association between amyloid deposition and musculoskeletal pathology in patients with common orthopedic conditions. A secondary purpose was to determine the relationship between amyloid positive biopsy in musculoskeletal tissue and the eventual diagnosis of systemic amyloidosis., Methods: We performed a systematic review using PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were level I-IV evidence articles that analyzed light-chain or transthyretin amyloid deposits in common orthopedic surgeries. Study methodological quality, risk of bias, and recommendation strength were assessed using MINORS, ROBINS-I, and SORT., Results: This systematic review included 24 studies for final analysis (3606 subjects). Amyloid deposition was reported in five musculoskeletal pathologies, including carpal tunnel syndrome (transverse carpal ligament and flexor tenosynovium), hip and knee osteoarthritis (synovium and articular cartilage), lumbar spinal stenosis (ligamentum flavum), and rotator cuff tears (tendon). A majority of studies reported a mean age greater than 70 for patients with TTR or AL positive amyloid., Conclusions: This systematic review has shown the presence of amyloid deposition detected at the time of common orthopedic surgeries, especially in patients ≥70 years old. Subtyping of the amyloid has been shown to enable diagnosis of systemic light-chain or transthyretin amyloidosis prior to cardiac manifestations., Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Objective: To evaluate the association between glycemic control (hemoglobin A1C, fasting glucose, and random glucose) and the outcomes of wound healing and lower extremity amputation (LEA) among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs)., Research Design and Methods: Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched for observational studies published up to March 2019. Five independent reviewers assessed in duplicate the eligibility of each study based on predefined eligibility criteria and two independent reviewers assessed risk of bias. Ameta-analysis was performed to calculate a pooled odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) using random effects for glycemic measures in relation to the outcomes of wound healing and LEA. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential source of heterogeneity between studies. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018096842)., Results: Of 4572 study records screened, 60 observational studies met the study eligibility criteria of which 47 studies had appropriate data for inclusion in one or more meta-analyses(n = 12,604 DFUs). For cohort studies comparing A1C >7.0 to 7.5% vs. lower A1C levels, the pooled OR for LEA was 2.04 (95% CI, 0.91, 4.57) and for studies comparing A1C ≥ 8% vs. <8%, the pooled OR for LEA was 4.80 (95% CI 2.83, 8.13). For cohort studies comparing fasting glucose ≥126 vs. <126 mg/dl, the pooled OR for LEA was 1.46 (95% CI, 1.02, 2.09). There was no association with A1C category and wound healing (OR or HR). There was high risk of bias with respect to comparability of cohorts as many studies did not adjust for potential confounders in the association between glycemic control and DFU outcomes., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that A1C levels ≥8% and fasting glucose levels ≥126 mg/dl are associated with increased likelihood of LEA in patients with DFUs. A purposively designed prospective study is needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying the association between hyperglycemia and LEA., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this study were reported. This work was prepared when J.L. was a methodologist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. The opinions expressed in this article are the author's own and do not reflect the view of the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the United States government., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Lymphatic flow plays a notable role in the regulation of bone formation and remodeling. Chronic accumulation of the lymph fluid within tissues may lead to issues with proper bone healing after fractures, emphasizing the importance of proper management of lymphedema after trauma. Many associated risk factors place patients at risk for lymphedema, including previous surgery with nodal dissection, radiation therapy, infection, malignancy, family history of congenital lymphedema, and trauma. The benchmark imaging technique for the diagnosis of lymphedema is lymphoscintigraphy. Other modalities include duplex ultrasonography, CT, and MRI. First-line conservative treatment of lymphedema is compression. Complete decongestive therapy or complex physical therapy, also known as decongestive lymphatic therapy (DLT), has shown positive results in reducing lymphedema. Surgical interventions aim to either reconstruct and restore function of the lymphatic system or debulk and reduce tissues and fluids. Understanding the significance of lymphedema on bone healing and techniques available to recognize it are important factors in preventing delay in diagnosis and ensuring proper management of lymphedema after trauma.

Purpose: To explore patients' perspectives and experiences living with moderate to severe glaucoma through qualitative, semistructured interviews and to identify important benefits and risks that patients consider when choosing glaucoma treatments., Design: Semistructured, in-person qualitative interviews with a convenience sample of patients seen at the Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute., Participants: Surgery-naive patients 21 years of age or older with moderate to severe open-angle glaucoma seeking treatment at the Wilmer Eye Institute's Glaucoma Center of Excellence between August and December 2018., Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with patients diagnosed with moderate to severe open-angle glaucoma, focusing on outcomes they prioritize when considering various treatment options. We used Atlas.ti software version 7.5.12 (Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany) to process interview transcripts and the framework approach to analyze the qualitative data., Main Outcome Measures: Patients' descriptions of outcomes important to them in management of moderate to severe open-angle glaucoma., Results: Thirteen men and 15 women with a median age 67 years participated in the study. Compared with the mild-to-moderate glaucoma patients interviewed previously, these participants similarly emphasized (1) activities of daily living, (2) visual symptoms, (3) treatment burden, and (4) intraocular pressure (IOP) control, but unlike patients with milder disease, most related IOP control directly to (5) avoiding disease progression. Almost all (27/28) had also given significant thought to (6) surgical decision making and could describe how they would decide for or against a particular procedure. Finally, two thirds (18/28) expressed (7) significant fear and worry related to their glaucoma diagnosis., Conclusions: We identified outcomes that matter to patients who are undergoing treatment for moderate to severe glaucoma, many of which may serve as end points in clinical trials, such as functional independence in vision-dependent activities of daily living, avoidance of visual symptoms, and disease progression via maintenance of IOP control. We also observed that these patients have varied and nuanced perspectives on surgical management and its outcomes. It behooves providers and trial designers to consider these in future evaluations of new treatments for moderate to severe glaucoma., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Climate change manifestation in the ocean, through warming, oxygen loss, increasing acidification, and changing particulate organic carbon flux (one metric of altered food supply), is projected to affect most deep-ocean ecosystems concomitantly with increasing direct human disturbance. Climate drivers will alter deep-sea biodiversity and associated ecosystem services, and may interact with disturbance from resource extraction activities or even climate geoengineering. We suggest that to ensure the effective management of increasing use of the deep ocean (e.g., for bottom fishing, oil and gas extraction, and deep-seabed mining), environmental management and developing regulations must consider climate change. Strategic planning, impact assessment and monitoring, spatial management, application of the precautionary approach, and full-cost accounting of extraction activities should embrace climate consciousness. Coupled climate and biological modeling approaches applied in the water and on the seafloor can help accomplish this goal. For example, Earth-System Model projections of climate-change parameters at the seafloor reveal heterogeneity in projected climate hazard and time of emergence (beyond natural variability) in regions targeted for deep-seabed mining. Models that combine climate-induced changes in ocean circulation with particle tracking predict altered transport of early life stages (larvae) under climate change. Habitat suitability models can help assess the consequences of altered larval dispersal, predict climate refugia, and identify vulnerable regions for multiple species under climate change. Engaging the deep observing community can support the necessary data provisioning to mainstream climate into the development of environmental management plans. To illustrate this approach, we focus on deep-seabed mining and the International Seabed Authority, whose mandates include regulation of all mineral-related activities in international waters and protecting the marine environment from the harmful effects of mining. However, achieving deep-ocean sustainability under the UN Sustainable Development Goals will require integration of climate consideration across all policy sectors., (© 2020 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Demodex blepharitis is a chronic condition commonly associated with recalcitrant dry eye symptoms though many people with Demodex mites are asymptomatic. The primary cause of this condition in humans is two types of Demodex mites: Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis. There are varying reports of the prevalence of Demodex blepharitis among adults, and it affects both men and women equally. While Demodex mites are commonly treated with tea tree oil, the effectiveness of tea tree oil for treating Demodex blepharitis is not well documented., Objectives: To evaluate the effects of tea tree oil on ocular Demodex infestation in people with Demodex blepharitis., Search Methods: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2019, Issue 6); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; LILACS; ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We used no date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the databases on 18 June 2019., Selection Criteria: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared treatment with tea tree oil (or its components) versus another treatment or no treatment for people with Demodex blepharitis., Data Collection and Analysis: Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts and then full text of records to determine their eligibility. The review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using Covidence. A third review author resolved any conflicts at all stages., Main Results: We included six RCTs (1124 eyes of 562 participants; 17 to 281 participants per study) from the US, Korea, China, Australia, Ireland, and Turkey. The RCTs compared some formulation of tea tree oil to another treatment or no treatment. Included participants were both men and women, ranging from 39 to 55 years of age. All RCTs were assessed at unclear or high risk of bias in one or more domains. We also identified two RCTs that are ongoing or awaiting publications. Data from three RCTs that reported a short-term mean change in the number of Demodex mites per eight eyelashes contributed to a meta-analysis. We are uncertain about the mean reduction for the groups that received the tea tree oil intervention (mean difference [MD] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24 to 1.16) at four to six weeks as compared to other interventions. Only one RCT reported data for long-term changes, which found that the group that received intense pulse light as the treatment had complete eradication of Demodex mites at three months. We graded the certainty of the evidence for this outcome as very low. Three RCTs reported no evidence of a difference for participant reported symptoms measured on the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) between the tea tree oil group and the group receiving other forms of intervention. Mean differences in these studies ranged from -10.54 (95% CI - 24.19, 3.11) to 3.40 (95% CI -0.70 7.50). We did not conduct a meta-analysis for this outcome given substantial statistical heterogeneity and graded the certainty of the evidence as low. One RCT provided information concerning visual acuity but did not provide sufficient data for between-group comparisons. The authors noted that mean habitual LogMAR visual acuity for all study participants improved post-treatment (mean LogMAR 1.16, standard deviation 0.26 at 4 weeks). We graded the certainty of evidence for this outcome as low. No RCTs provided data on mean change in number of cylindrical dandruff or the proportion of participants experiencing conjunctival injection or experiencing meibomian gland dysfunction. Three RCTs provided information on adverse events. One reported no adverse events. The other two described a total of six participants randomized to treatment with tea tree oil who experienced ocular irritation or discomfort that resolved with re-educating the patient on application techniques and continuing use of the tea tree oil. We graded the certainty of the evidence for this outcome as very low., Authors' Conclusions: The current review suggests that there is uncertainty related to the effectiveness of 5% to 50% tea tree oil for the short-term treatment of Demodex blepharitis; however, if used, lower concentrations may be preferable in the eye care arena to avoid induced ocular irritation. Future studies should be better controlled, assess outcomes at long term (e.g. 10 to 12 weeks or beyond), account for patient compliance, and study the effects of different tea tree oil concentrations., (Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: During systematic reviews, "data abstraction" refers to the process of collecting data from reports of studies. The data abstractors' level of experience may affect the accuracy of data abstracted. Using data from a randomized crossover trial in which different data abstraction approaches were compared, we examined the association between abstractors' level of experience and accuracy of data abstraction., Methods: We classified abstractors as "more experienced" if they had authored three or more published systematic reviews, and "less experienced" otherwise. Each abstractor abstracted data related to study design, baseline characteristics, and outcomes/results from six articles. We considered two types of errors: incorrect abstraction and errors of omission. We estimated the proportion of errors by level of experience using a binomial generalized linear mixed model., Results: We used data from 25 less experienced and 25 more experienced data abstractors. Overall error proportions were similar for less experienced abstractors (21%) and more experienced abstractors (19%). Compared with less experienced abstractors, more experienced abstractors had a lower odds of errors for data items related to outcomes/results (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.82) and potentially for data items related to study design (adjusted OR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.64-1.09) but a potentially higher odds of errors for items related to baseline characteristics (adjusted OR = 1.42; 95% CI, 0.97-2.06)., Conclusion: Experience of data abstraction matters little. Errors are reduced by adjudication but still remain high for data items related to outcomes/results., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Despite its widespread value to molecular biology, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) encounters modes that unproductively consume PCR resources and prevent clean signals, especially when high sensitivity, high SNP discrimination, and high multiplexing are sought. Here, we show how "self-avoiding molecular recognition systems" (SAMRS) manage such difficulties. SAMRS nucleobases pair with complementary nucleotides with strengths comparable to the A:T pair, but do not pair with other SAMRS nucleobases. This should allow primers holding SAMRS components to avoid primer-primer interactions, preventing primer dimers, allowing more sensitive SNP detection, and supporting higher levels of multiplex PCR. The experiments here examine the PCR performances of primers containing different numbers of SAMRS components placed strategically at different positions, and put these performances in the context of estimates of SAMRS:standard pairing strengths. The impact of these variables on primer dimer formation, the overall efficiency and sensitivity of SAMRS-based PCR, and the value of SAMRS primers when detecting single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are also evaluated. With appropriately chosen polymerases, SNP discrimination can be greater than the conventional allele-specific PCR, with the further benefit of avoiding primer dimer artifacts. General rules guiding the design of SAMRS-modified primers are offered to support medical research and clinical diagnostics products., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Many therapeutic options are available to glaucoma patients. One recent therapeutic option is minimally invasive glaucoma surgical (MIGS) devices. It is unclear how patients view different treatments and which patient-reported outcomes would be most relevant in patients with mild to moderate glaucoma. We developed a questionnaire for patients eligible for MIGS devices and a patient preference study to examine the value patients place on certain outcomes associated with glaucoma and its therapies., Objectives: To summarize the progress to date., Methods: Questionnaire development: We drafted the questionnaire items based on input from one physician and four patient focus groups, and a review of the literature. We tested item clarity with six cognitive interviews. These items were further refined. Patient preference study: We identified important benefit and risk outcomes qualitatively using semi-structured, one-on-one interviews with patients who were eligible for MIGS devices. We then prioritized these outcomes quantitatively using best-worst scaling methods., Results: Questionnaire testing: Three concepts were deemed relevant for the questionnaire: functional limitations, symptoms, and psychosocial factors. We will evaluate the reliability and validity of the 52-item draft questionnaire in an upcoming field test. Patient preference study: We identified 13 outcomes that participants perceived as important. Outcomes with the largest relative importance weights were "adequate IOP control" and "drive a car during the day.", Conclusions: Patients have the potential to steer clinical research towards outcomes that are important to them. Incorporating patients' perspectives into the MIGS device development and evaluation process may expedite innovation and availability of these devices.

Importance: Patient care and clinical practice guidelines should be informed by evidence from reliable systematic reviews. The reliability of systematic reviews related to forthcoming guidelines for retina and vitreous conditions is unknown., Objectives: To summarize the reliability of systematic reviews on interventions for 7 retina and vitreous conditions, describe characteristics of reliable and unreliable systematic reviews, and examine the primary area in which they appeared to be lacking., Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews was conducted. Systematic reviews of interventions for retina- and vitreous-related conditions in a database maintained by the Cochrane Eyes and Vision United States Satellite were identified. Databases that the reviewers searched, whether any date or language restrictions were applied, and bibliographic information, such as year and journal of publication, were documented. The initial search was conducted in March 2007, and the final update was performed in July 2018. The conditions of interest were age-related macular degeneration; diabetic retinopathy; idiopathic epiretinal membrane and vitreomacular traction; idiopathic macular hole; posterior vitreous detachment, retinal breaks, and lattice degeneration; retinal and ophthalmic artery occlusions; and retinal vein occlusions. The reliability of each review was evaluated using prespecified criteria. Data were extracted by 2 research assistants working independently, with disagreements resolved through discussion or by 1 research assistant with verification by a senior team member., Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of reviews that meet all of the following criteria: (1) defined eligibility criteria for study selection, (2) described conducting a comprehensive literature search, (3) reported assessing risk of bias in included studies, (4) described using appropriate methods for any meta-analysis performed, and (5) provided conclusions consistent with review findings., Results: A total of 327 systematic reviews that addressed retina and vitreous conditions were identified; of these, 131 reviews (40.1%) were classified as reliable and 196 reviews (59.9%) were classified as not reliable. At least 1 reliable review was found for each of the 7 retina and vitreous conditions. The most common reason that a review was classified as not reliable was lack of evidence that a comprehensive literature search for relevant studies had been conducted (149 of 196 reviews [76.0%])., Conclusion and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that most systematic reviews that addressed interventions for retina and vitreous conditions were not reliable. Systematic review teams and guideline developers should work with information professionals who can help navigate sophisticated and varied syntaxes required to search different resources.

Importance: For findings from clinical trials to be actionable, outcomes measured in trials must be fully defined and, when appropriate, defined consistently across trials. Otherwise, it is difficult to compare findings between trials, combine results in meta-analyses, or leverage findings collectively to inform health care decision-making., Objective: To identify and characterize outcomes specified in ClinicalTrials.gov records for publicly funded clinical trials for 3 high-burden, high-prevalence eye conditions., Design, Setting, and Participants: ClinicalTrials.gov, a registry of publicly and privately supported clinical studies, was searched on January 31, 2019, for records of clinical trials for age-related macular degeneration (AMD), dry eye, or refractive error. The search was limited to trials funded by the National Eye Institute but did not impose a date restriction. Five elements of a well-specified outcome were extracted from each outcome stated in each record, including the domain, method of measurement, metric, method of aggregation, and time points., Main Outcomes and Measures: Number of outcome domains specified for trials for AMD, dry eye, and refractive error and the number of trial records specifying each unique domain., Results: A total of 49 unique outcome domains specified across 39 records of trials were identified. The median (interquartile range) number of records specifying each unique outcome domain was 1 (1-3), 1.5 (1-2), and 1 (1-1) for AMD, dry eye, and refractive error, respectively. Even when the same domains were registered across multiple trials, the time point, specific metric, and method of aggregation were specified in multiple ways., Conclusions and Relevance: There were too many outcomes with too little overlap in the sample of trials that were examined. Differences in how outcomes are measured across trials make it difficult to compare results, even for well-established domains, such as visual acuity. To reduce this waste in eye and vision research, the time is ripe for agreeing on what outcomes to measure.

Purpose: To quantify patients' preferences for glaucoma outcomes and use this information to prioritize outcomes that are important to patients., Design: A cross-sectional study using best-worst scaling object case (BWS)., Participants: Two hundred seventy-four participants newly diagnosed with ocular hypertension or mild to moderate open angle glaucoma from three private practices and one academic medical center in the United States., Methods: We designed a preference-elicitation survey based on findings from 25 semi-structured, qualitative interviews with patients with glaucoma (reported elsewhere). The survey asked participants to rate the importance of 13 glaucoma outcomes on a Likert scale as a warm-up exercise followed by completion of 13 BWS tasks. For each task, we presented participants a subset of four outcomes from the possible thirteen, and participants chose the most important and least important outcome. Outcomes included in the survey pertain to maintaining ability to perform vision-dependent activities of daily living (e.g., driving), maintaining visual function and perception (e.g., depth perception), minimizing need to take glaucoma drops, not experiencing ocular surface symptoms (e.g., red eyes, teary eyes), and having adequate control of intraocular pressure (IOP). We administered the survey online and analyzed response patterns using conditional logistic regression to determine the relative importance of different outcomes., Main Outcome: Ordinal ranking of glaucoma outcomes based on preference weights., Results: Between September 1, 2017 and February 28, 2018, we invited 1035 patients to complete our survey, among whom 274 (26%) responded. Most participants were older than 65 years of age (146/274, 53%) and currently on IOP-lowering drops (179/274, 65%). Participants identified that outcomes with the largest relative importance weight were having "adequate IOP control" and ability to "drive a car during the day," and the outcomes with the smallest relative importance weights were "maintaining appearance of the eye" and "reducing the number of IOP-lowering drops"., Conclusions: Determining the relative importance of glaucoma outcomes to patients can help researchers design studies that may better inform clinical and regulatory decision-making. Although IOP is an outcome that researchers often measure in glaucoma clinical trials, patients also prioritized outcomes related to the ability to perform vision-dependent activities such as driving., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST See ICMJE form and Funding

Purpose: To explore patients' perspectives and experiences living with glaucoma and identify important benefits and risks that patients consider before electing for new glaucoma treatments, such as minimally invasive glaucoma surgical (MIGS) devices., Design: Semi-structured, in-person qualitative interviews with patients seen at the Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute., Participants: Adults older than 21 years of age who were suspected or diagnosed with ocular hypertension or mild to moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) (and thus eligible for treatment with a MIGS procedure) presenting to a glaucoma clinic in Baltimore, Maryland, between May and December 2016., Method: We conducted in-person interviews with patients recently diagnosed with ocular hypertension or POAG. We focused on considerations patients take into account when deciding between different treatments. We used the framework approach to code and analyze the qualitative data. Considerations of special interest to us were those that can be translated into outcomes (or endpoints) in clinical trials., Main Outcome Measures: Patients' perspectives concerning outcomes that matter to them when managing ocular hypertension or POAG., Results: Ten male and fifteen female patients participated in our study. The median participant age was 69 years (range 47 - 82 years). We identified outcomes that patients expressed as important, which we grouped into four thematic categories: (1) limitations in performing specific vision-dependent activities of daily living; (2) problems with general visual function or perceptions; (3) treatment burden, including ocular adverse events; and (4) intraocular pressure (IOP). All 25 participants expressed some concerns with their ability to perform vision-dependent activities, such as reading and driving. Most (23/25) participants had an opinion about IOP, and among those currently taking ocular hypotensive eye drops, all recognized the relationship between eye drops and IOP., Conclusion: We have identified outcomes that matter to patients who are deciding between different treatments for ocular hypertension and POAG, such as the ability to drive or maintain mobility outside the home. These outcomes will be important in future evaluations of new treatments for glaucoma., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTERST No conflicting relationship exists for any author

Background: Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. In early stages, glaucoma results in progressive loss of peripheral (side) vision; in later stages, it results in loss of central vision leading to blindness. Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only known modifiable risk factor for glaucoma. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgical (MIGS) techniques, such as ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with iStent (Glaukos Corporation, Laguna Hills, CA, USA), have been introduced as a new treatment modality for glaucoma. However, the effectiveness of MIGS on keeping people 'drop-free' (i.e. not having to use eye drops to control IOP) and other outcomes is uncertain., Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and safety of ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with iStent (or iStent inject) for open-angle glaucoma in comparison to conventional medical, laser, or surgical treatment., Search Methods: Cochrane Eyes and Vision's Information Specialist searched the following databases on 17 August 2018: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2018, Issue 7), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, the ISRCTN registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We applied no date or language restrictions. We searched the reference lists of reports from included studies., Selection Criteria: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that had compared iStent or iStent inject to medical therapy, laser treatment, conventional glaucoma surgery (trabeculectomy), or other MIGS procedures. We included RCTs that had compared iStent or iStent inject in combination with phacoemulsification to phacoemulsification alone., Data Collection and Analysis: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently screened search results, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data from reports of included RCTs using an electronic data collection form., Main Results: We included seven RCTs (765 eyes of 764 participants; range per study 33 to 239 participants) that evaluated iStent in people with open-angle glaucoma. We also identified 13 studies that are ongoing or awaiting publications of results. Most participants in the included studies were women (417/764 (55%) participants) and older age (age range: 49 to 89 years). We assessed most trials at unclear or high risk of bias: four trials did not clearly report the method of generating the random sequence or concealing allocation; five were unmasked, open-label studies, which we assessed at high risk of bias for performance and detection bias. All seven trials were funded by the Glaukos Corporation. We graded the certainty of evidence as very low.Four RCTs compared iStent in combination with phacoemulsification to phacoemulsification alone. The summary estimate which we derived from two of the four RCTs suggested that participants in the iStent in combination with phacoemulsification group were 1.38 times more likely to be drop-free between six and 18 months than those in the phacoemulsification alone group (risk ratio (RR) 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18 to 1.63, I 2 = 67%). Data from two RCTs also suggested that iStent in combination with phacoemulsification compared to phacoemulsification alone may have offered a small reduction in number of IOP-lowering drops (mean difference (MD) -0.42 drops, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.23). It is uncertain whether there was any difference in terms of mean reduction in IOP from baseline (no meta-analysis).Two RCTs compared treatment with iStent to medical therapy; one of the two trials used the iStent inject. We determined the two trials to be clinically and methodologically heterogeneous and did not conduct a meta-analysis; however, the investigators of both trials reported that over 90% of participants in the treatment groups were drop-free compared to no participants in the medical therapy groups at six to 18 months.One RCT compared treatment with one versus two versus three iStents. There was no difference in terms of participants who were drop-free at 36 months or less; however, at longer follow-up (i.e. at 42 months) participants in the one iStent treatment were less likely to be drop-free than those in the two iStent (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.75) or three iStent (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.73) treatment groups. The study did not report the mean change in number of IOP-lowering drops.The type and timing of complications reported varied by RCTs. Similar proportions of participants who underwent treatment with iStent in combination with phacoemulsification and who underwent phacoemulsification alone needed secondary glaucoma surgery. None of RCTs reported findings related to quality of life., Authors' Conclusions: There is very low-quality evidence that treatment with iStent may result in higher proportions of participants who are drop-free or achieving better IOP control, in the short, medium, or long-term. Results from the 13 studies with results not yet available may clarify the benefits of treatment of people with iStent. Additionally, future MIGS studies should consider measuring quality of life and outcomes that reflect people's ability to perform vision-dependent activities.

Neutrophil migration to the site of bacterial infection is a critical step in host defense. Exclusively produced in the bone marrow, neutrophil release into the blood is tightly controlled. Although the chemokine CXCL1 induces neutrophil influx during bacterial infections, its role in regulating neutrophil recruitment, granulopoiesis, and neutrophil mobilization in response to lung infection-induced sepsis is unclear. Here, we used a murine model of intrapulmonary Streptococcus pneumoniae infection to investigate the role of CXCL1 in host defense, granulopoiesis, and neutrophil mobilization. Our results demonstrate that CXCL1 augments neutrophil influx to control bacterial growth in the lungs, as well as bacterial dissemination, resulting in improved host survival. This was shown in Cxcl1 -/- mice, which exhibited defective amplification of early neutrophil precursors in granulocytic compartments, and CD62L- and CD49d-dependent neutrophil release from the marrow. Administration of recombinant CXCL2 and CXCL5 after infection rescues the impairments in neutrophil-dependent host defense in Cxcl1 -/- mice. Taken together, these findings identify CXCL1 as a central player in host defense, granulopoiesis, and mobilization of neutrophils during Gram-positive bacterial pneumonia-induced sepsis., (© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.)