1. Clinical use of 0.1% polyhexanide and propylbetaine on acute and hard-to-heal wounds: a literature review.
- Author
-
Lazzari, Giuseppe, Cesa, Simonetta, and Lo Palo, Emilia
- Subjects
CLEANING compounds ,WOUND healing ,MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems ,CINAHL database ,BANDAGES & bandaging ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,MEDLINE ,STERILIZATION (Disinfection) ,BACTERICIDES ,DRUG efficacy ,PAIN management ,WOUND care ,SURGICAL dressings ,PATIENT satisfaction ,DEBRIDEMENT ,CHRONIC wounds & injuries ,PRESSURE ulcers ,EVALUATION - Abstract
Objective: To summarise the findings on the effect of the clinical use of 0.1% polyhexanide–propylbetaine (PHMB/betaine) solution/gel on acute and hard-to-heal (chronic) wound healing. Method: A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus and the CENTRAL Trials Registry of the Cochrane Collaboration. Paired reviewers conducted title and abstract screening and full-text screening to identify experimental, quasi-experimental and observational studies. Study quality and risk of bias were not formally evaluated. Results: A total of 17 studies met the eligibility criteria. The findings from 12 studies indicated that the use of 0.1% PHMB/betaine solution/gel had: a low risk of contact sensitivity; could help debridement during wound cleansing; aided effective wound bed preparation; reduced wound size, odour and exudate; improved pain control; reduced microbial load; and enhanced wound healing. The results of three studies indicated that both 0.1% PHMB and saline solution were effective in reducing bacterial load, while another showed that adding 0.1% PHMB to tie-over dressings had no effect on reducing bacterial loads in wounds. Another study concluded that disinfection and granulation of pressure ulcers with hydrobalance dressing with 0.3% PHMB was faster and more effective than using 0.1% PHMB/betaine. Conclusion: The findings of this literature review showed that 0.1% PHMB/betaine solution/gel appeared to be useful and safe for wound cleansing, was effective in removing soft debris and slough from the wound bed, and created a wound environment optimal for healing. Although these actions cannot be attributed solely to this treatment modality, these results do highlight the unique action of this combined product. However, more robust studies are needed to confirm these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF