Search

Background/objective To reproduce the methods and results of the study by Alobeid et al. (2018) in which the efficacy of tooth alignment using conventional labial and lingual orthodontic bracket systems was assessed. Materials/methods We used the identical experimental protocol and tested (i) regular twin bracket (GAC-Twin [Dentsply]) and lingual twin bracket systems (Incognito [3M]), (ii) together with NiTi 0.014” wires (RMO), and (iii) a simulated malocclusion with a displaced maxillary central incisor in the x-axis (2 mm gingivally) and in the z-axis (2 mm labially). Results The method described by Alobeid et al. (2018) is not reproducible, and cannot be used to assess the efficacy of tooth alignment in labial or lingual orthodontic treatment. Major flaws concern the anteroposterior return of the Thermaloy-NiTi wire ligated with stainless steel ligatures. The reproduced experimental setting showed that a deflected Thermaloy-NiTi wire DOES NOT move back at all to its initial stage (= 0 per cent correction) because of friction and binding (see supplemented video), neither with the tested labial nor with the lingual brackets. Furthermore, an overcorrection of up to 138 per cent, which the authors indicate for some labial bracket-wire combinations and which deserves the characterization “irreal”, stresses the inappropriateness of the method of measurement.Further flaws include: a) incorrect interpretation of the measurement results, where a tooth tripping around (overcorrection) is interpreted as a better outcome than a perfect 100 per cent correction; b) using a statistical test in an inappropriate and misleading way; c) uncritical copying of text passages from older publications to describe the method, which do not correspond to this experimental protocol and lead to calculation errors; d) wrong citations; e)differences in table and bar graph values of the same variable; f) using a lingual mushroom shaped 0.013” Thermaloy-NiTi wire which does not exist; g) drawing uncritical conclusions of so called "clinical relevance" from a very limited in vitro testing. Conclusions Clinical recommendations based on in vitro measurements using the Orthodontic Measurement and Simulation System (OMSS) should be read with caution.

International audience

International audience; AIM:Mouth breathing is a functional disorder that affects craniofacial and dento-alveolar growth and also upper airway (UA) anatomy. This is apparent mainly in dimensional abnormalities of the UA caused by hypertrophy of Waldeyer's ring and excessive vertical development of the lower part, giving rise to labial incompetence that perpetuates the functional disorder. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the development of the oropharyngeal structures in young hyperdivergent patients who had undergone functional genioplasty in the context of orthodontic treatment.METHODS:This is a comparative retrospective study performed on 47 adolescents who were hyperdivergent, non-obese and exclusive or diurnal mouth breathers, treated at the Centre de soins, d'enseignement et de recherche dentaires (CSERD) in Montpellier, France. All were candidates for early genioplasty for vertical reduction, and were undergoing or at the end of treatment: 23 had been treated surgically (functional genioplasty), and 24 controls had received orthodontic treatment alone. Inter-group comparison of the changes in cephalometric measurements of the oro- and nasopharyngeal zones and maxillomandibular measurements was performed using covariance analysis (ANCOVA) to adjust for confounding factors.RESULTS:Concerning the skeletal structures: in the sagittal dimension, genioplasty led to significantly greater projection of the symphysis in the surgical group than in the control group (P