Search

In neurons, mRNAs can be repressed postinitiation and assembled into granules enabling the transport and later, regulated reactivation of the paused mRNAs. It has been suggested that a large percentage of transcripts in neuronal processes are stored in these stalled polysomes. Given this, it is predicted that nascent peptides should be abundant in these granules. Nascent peptides can be visualized in real time by the SunTag system. Using this system, we observe nascent peptides in neuronal processes that are resistant to runoff with the initiation inhibitor homoharringtonin (HHT) and to release by puromycin, properties expected from RNA granules consisting of stalled polysomes. In contrast, nascent peptides in nonneuronal cells and neuronal cell bodies were not resistant to HHT or puromycin. Stalled polysomes can also be visualized after runoff with ribopuromycylation and the RNA granules imaged with ribopuromycylation were the same as those with SunTag visualized nascent peptides. Accordingly, the ribopuromycylated puncta in neuronal dendrites were also resistant to puromycin. Thus, the SunTag technique corroborates in situ evidence of stalled polysomes and will allow for the live examination of these translational structures as a mechanism for mRNA transport and regulated protein synthesis.

It has been known since the time of patient H. M. and Karl Lashley's equipotentiality studies that the hippocampus and cortex serve mnestic functions. Current memory models maintain that these two brain structures accomplish unique, but interactive, memory functions. Specifically, most modeling suggests that memories are rapidly acquired during waking experience by the hippocampus, before being later consolidated into the cortex for long-term storage. Sleep has been shown to be critical for the transfer and consolidation of memories in the cortex. Like memory consolidation, a role for sleep in adaptive forgetting has both historical precedent, as Francis Crick suggested in 1983 that sleep was for "reverse-learning," and recent empirical support. In this article I review the evidence indicating that the same brain activity involved in sleep replay associated memory consolidation is responsible for sleep-dependent forgetting. In reviewing the literature, it became clear that both a cellular mechanism for systems consolidation and an agreed upon general, as well as cellular, mechanism for sleep-dependent forgetting is seldom discussed or is lacking. I advocate here for a candidate cellular systems consolidation mechanism wherein changes in calcium kinetics and the activation of consolidative signaling cascades arise from the triple phase locking of non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS) slow oscillation, sleep spindle and sharp-wave ripple rhythms. I go on to speculatively consider several sleep stage specific forgetting mechanisms and conclude by discussing a notional function of NREM-rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) cycling. The discussed model argues that the cyclical organization of sleep functions to first lay down and edit and then stabilize and integrate engrams. All things considered, it is increasingly clear that hallmark sleep stage rhythms, including several NREMS oscillations and the REMS hippocampal theta rhythm, serve the dual function of enabling simultaneous memory consolidation and adaptive forgetting. Specifically, the same sleep rhythms that consolidate new memories, in the cortex and hippocampus, simultaneously organize the adaptive forgetting of older memories in these brain regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses human rapid eye movement (REM) sleep delta waves and the blurring distinction between non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and REM sleep. Topics include component of NREM sleep in specific regions of the brain during REM sleep, regional delta waves during REM sleep, and how information is encoded during waking by the strengthening of synapses.

Treatments that improve cognition and decrease depression converge on decreasing phosphorylation of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2). This decrease is sufficient to lead to altered levels of proteins that cause an increase in new neurons, improved cognition and less depression., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Trettenbrein (2016) has argued that the concept of the synapse as the locus of memory is outdated and has made six critiques of this concept. In this article, we examine these six critiques and suggest that the current theories of the neurobiology of memory and the empirical data indicate that synaptic activation is the first step in a chain of cellular and biochemical events that lead to memories formed in cell assemblies and neural networks that rely on synaptic modification for their formation. These neural networks and their modified synaptic connections can account for the cognitive basis of learning and memory and for memory deterioration in neurological disorders. We first discuss Hebb's (1949) theory that synaptic change and the formation of cell assemblies and phase sequences can link neurophysiology to cognitive processes. We then examine each of Trettenbrein's (2016) critiques of the synaptic theory in light of Hebb's theories and recent empirical data. We examine the biochemical basis of memory formation and the necessity of synaptic modification to form the neural networks underlying learning and memory. We then examine the use of Hebb's theories of synaptic change and cell assemblies for integrating neurophysiological and cognitive conceptions of learning and memory. We conclude with an examination of the applications of the Hebb synapse and cell assembly theories to the study of the neuroscience of learning and memory, the development of computational models of memory and the construction of "intelligent" robots. We conclude that the synaptic theory of memory has not met its demise, but is essential to our understanding of the neural basis of memory, which has two components: synaptic plasticity and intrinsic plasticity.