151 results on '"Kremen C"'
Search Results
2. Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people
- Author
-
Kremen, C. and Merenlender, A. M.
- Published
- 2018
3. Economic Incentives for Rain Forest Conservation across Scales
- Author
-
Kremen, C., Niles, J. O., Dalton, M. G., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., Fay, J. P., Grewal, D., and Guillery, R. P.
- Published
- 2000
4. Evaluating the Quality of Citizen-Scientist Data on Pollinator Communities
- Author
-
KREMEN, C., ULLMANN, K. S., and THORP, R. W.
- Published
- 2011
5. Aligning Conservation Priorities across Taxa in Madagascar with High-Resolution Planning Tools
- Author
-
Kremen, C., Cameron, A., Moilanen, A., Phillips, S. J., Thomas, C. D., Beentje, H., Dransfield, J., Fisher, B. L., Glaw, F., Good, T. C., Harper, G. J., Hijmans, R. J., Lees, D. C., Louis, E., Nussbaum, R. A., Raxworthy, C. J., Razafimpahana, A., Schatz, G. E., Vences, M., Vieites, D. R., Wright, P. C., and Zjhra, M. L.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Terrestrial Arthropod Assemblages: Their Use in Conservation Planning
- Author
-
Kremen, C., Colwell, R. K., Erwin, T. L., Murphy, D. D., Noss, R. F., and Sanjayan, M. A.
- Published
- 1993
7. Testing the `Mimicry' Explanation for the Colias `alba' Polymorphism: Patterns of Co-Occurrence of Colias and Pierine Butterflies
- Author
-
Watt, W. B., Kremen, C., and Carter, P.
- Published
- 1989
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Functional connectivity of the world’s protected areas.
- Author
-
Brennan, A., Naidoo, R., Greenstreet, L., Mehrabi, Z., Ramankutty, N., and Kremen, C.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Ecosystem-Service Science and the Way Forward for Conservation
- Author
-
Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., Kremen, C., Ricketts, T. H., and Sanjayan, M. A.
- Published
- 2007
10. Ecosystem-Service Science and the Way Forward for Conservation
- Author
-
Armsworth, P. R., Chan, K. M. A., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., Kremen, C., Ricketts, T. H., and Sanjayan, M. A.
- Published
- 2007
11. Opportunistic attachment assembles plant–pollinator networks
- Author
-
Ponisio, LC, Gaiarsa, MP, and Kremen, C
- Abstract
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS Species and interactions are being lost at alarming rates and it is imperative to understand how communities assemble if we have to prevent their collapse and restore lost interactions. Using an 8-year dataset comprising nearly 20 000 pollinator visitation records, we explore the assembly of plant–pollinator communities at native plant restoration sites in an agricultural landscape. We find that species occupy highly dynamic network positions through time, causing the assembly process to be punctuated by major network reorganisations. The most persistent pollinator species are also the most variable in their network positions, contrary to what preferential attachment – the most widely studied theory of ecological network assembly – predicts. Instead, we suggest assembly occurs via an opportunistic attachment process. Our results contribute to our understanding of how communities assembly and how species interactions change through time while helping to inform efforts to reassemble robust communities.
- Published
- 2017
12. Functional traits in agriculture: Agrobiodiversity and ecosystem services
- Author
-
Wood, SA, Karp, DS, DeClerck, F, Kremen, C, Naeem, S, and Palm, CA
- Subjects
Evolutionary Biology ,Theoretical ,Models ,agrobiodiversity ,biodiversity-ecosystem functioning ,Agriculture ,Biodiversity ,Biological Sciences ,ecosystem services ,functional trait ,functional diversity ,Ecosystem ,Environmental Sciences - Abstract
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. Functional trait research has led to greater understanding of the impacts of biodiversity in ecosystems. Yet, functional trait approaches have not been widely applied to agroecosystems and understanding of the importance of agrobiodiversity remains limited to a few ecosystem processes and services. To improve this understanding, we argue here for a functional trait approach to agroecology that adopts recent advances in trait research for multitrophic and spatially heterogeneous ecosystems. We suggest that trait values should be measured across environmental conditions and agricultural management regimes to predict how ecosystem services vary with farm practices and environment. This knowledge should be used to develop management strategies that can be easily implemented by farmers to manage agriculture to provide multiple ecosystem services.
- Published
- 2015
13. EDITOR'S CHOICE: Small-scale restoration in intensive agricultural landscapes supports more specialized and less mobile pollinator species
- Author
-
Kremen, C, M'Gonigle, LK, and Diamond, Sarah
- Subjects
Ecology ,Life on Land ,Environmental Science and Management ,syrphid fly ,fungi ,conservation ,response traits ,land-use change ,Ecological Applications ,before-after control-impact ,pollination service ,bee ,Apoidea ,hedgerow - Abstract
© 2015 British Ecological Society. Agriculture now constitutes 40-50% of terrestrial land use globally. By enhancing habitat suitability and connectivity, restoration within agricultural landscapes could have a major influence on biodiversity conservation. However, habitat management within intensive agricultural landscapes may primarily boost abundances of common, highly mobile generalists, rather than vulnerable or endangered species. We studied pollinator community response to small-scale habitat restoration in the intensively farmed Central Valley of California to determine whether restoration could also promote more specialized, less common and/or less mobile species. Composition of pollinator communities was assessed in five experimental and 10 control (unrestored) sites before and after restoration of native plant hedgerows over an 8-year period, using a before-after control-impact design. We characterized bee and fly species based on functional response traits [floral specialization, habitat specialization, abundance, body size and sociality (bees only)] known to influence the response to habitat change. We modelled how species occurrences changed with habitat restoration over time as modulated by their response traits. We found that hedgerows not only significantly enhanced occurrences of native bee and syrphid fly species, but that as hedgerows matured, they had a greater positive effect on species that were more specialized in floral and nesting resources and smaller (less mobile). Synthesis and applications. Unlike previous studies that suggest habitat restoration in agricultural landscapes only benefits mobile, generalist species, our results suggest that small-scale habitat restoration can promote species whose traits likely render them particularly vulnerable to habitat degradation. Thus, even within highly intensive agricultural landscapes, small-scale habitat restoration can be a conservation management tool. However, tailoring habitat enhancements to promote certain species or guilds may be critical for their success as a conservation intervention in agricultural landscapes. Unlike previous studies that suggest habitat restoration in agricultural landscapes only benefits mobile, generalist species, our results suggest that small-scale habitat restoration can promote species whose traits likely render them particularly vulnerable to habitat degradation. Thus, even within highly intensive agricultural landscapes, small-scale habitat restoration can be a conservation management tool. However, tailoring habitat enhancements to promote certain species or guilds may be critical for their success as a conservation intervention in agricultural landscapes.
- Published
- 2015
14. Giving Back: Nature Conservation in Madagascar
- Author
-
Kremen, C
- Subjects
lcsh:Academies and learned societies ,conservation biology ,livelihood ,sustainable development ,capacity building ,Business and Management ,nature conservation ,park design ,environmental science ,Education ,Sociology ,Other Education ,Madagascar ,lcsh:AS1-945 - Abstract
This research note is part of the thematic section, Practical Realities of Giving Back, in the special issue titled “Giving Back in Field Research,” published as Volume 10, Issue 2 in the Journal of Research Practice.
- Published
- 2014
15. 4.11 - Vulnerability of Pollination Ecosystem Services
- Author
-
Jha, S., Burkle, L., and Kremen, C.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Vulnerability of Pollination Ecosystem Services
- Author
-
Jha, S, Burkle, L, and Kremen, C
- Abstract
Humans are dependent on pollinators for food security and for a vast number of services mediated by wild and cultivated plants, yet we know little about how pollination services could be affected by changes in local and regional climate. In this chapter, we review the current literature on pollination services and environmental change and provide ecologically informed suggestions for managing pollination services, focusing on native pollinators. Our management suggestions are intended to be generalizable for scientists and policy makers across communities and ecoregions. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- Published
- 2013
17. Letter to the editor: Conservation: Limits of Land Sparing
- Author
-
Fischer, J., Batáry, P., Bawa, K., Brussaard, L., Chappell, M.J., Clough, Y., Daily, G., Dorrough, J., Hartel, T., Jackson, L.E., Klein, A.M., Kremen, C., Kuemmerle, T., Lindenmayer, D.B., Mooney, H.A., Perfecto, I., Philpott, S.M., Tscharntke, T., van der Meer, J., Wanger, T.C., and von Wehrden, H.
- Subjects
food ,ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION ,Soil Biology ,biodiversity conservation ,PE&RC ,Bodembiologie - Published
- 2011
18. Pest Control and Pollination Cost-Benefit Analysis of Hedgerow Restoration in a Simplified Agricultural Landscape.
- Author
-
Morandin, L. A., Long, R. F., and Kremen, C.
- Subjects
HEDGEROW ecology ,BIOLOGICAL control of insects ,RESTORATION ecology ,HONEYBEES ,POLLINATION ,COST effectiveness - Abstract
Field edge habitat in homogeneous agricultural landscapes can serve multiple purposes including enhanced biodiversity, water quality protection, and habitat for beneficial insects, such as native bees and natural enemies. Despite this ecosystem service value, adoption of field border plantings, such as hedgerows, on largescale mono-cropped farms is minimal. With profits primarily driving agricultural production, a major challenge affecting hedgerow plantings is linked to establishment costs and the lack of clear economic benefits on the restoration investment. Our study documented that hedgerows are economically viable to growers by enhancing beneficial insects and natural pest control and pollination on farms. With pest control alone, our model shows that it w o u l d take 16 yr to break even f r om insecticide savings on the US$4,000 cost of a typical 300-m hedgerow field edge planting. By adding in pollination benefits by native bees, where honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) may be limiting, the return time is reduced to 7 yr. USDA cost share programs allow for a quicker return on a hedgerow investment. Our study shows that over time, small-scale restoration can be profitable, helping to overcome the barrier of cost associated with field edge habitat restoration on farms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Interacting effects of pollination, water and nutrients on fruit tree performance.
- Author
-
Klein, A.‐M., Hendrix, S. D., Clough, Y., Scofield, A., Kremen, C., and Vereecken, N.
- Subjects
POLLINATION ,PLANT nutrients ,FRUIT trees ,PERFORMANCE evaluation ,PLANT reproduction ,ALMOND - Abstract
Pollination is critical to fruit production, but the interactions of pollination with plant resources on a plant's reproductive and vegetative features are largely overlooked. We examined the influences of pollination, irrigation and fertilisation on the performance of almond, Prunus dulcis, in northern California. We used a full-factorial design to test for the effects of pollination limitation on fruit production and foliage variables of whole trees experiencing four resource treatments: (i) normal water and nutrients, (ii) reduced water, (iii) no nutrients, and (iv) reduced water and no nutrients. In each of these combinations, we applied three pollination treatments: hand-cross pollination, open-pollination and pollinator exclusion. Pollination strongly affected yield even under reduced water and no nutrient applications. Hand-cross pollination resulted in over 50% fruit set with small kernels, while open-pollinated flowers showed over 30% fruit set with moderate-sized kernels. Pollinator-excluded flowers had a maximum fruit set of 5%, with big and heavy kernels. Reduced water interacted with the open- and hand-cross pollination treatments, reducing yield more than in the pollinator exclusion treatment. The number of kernels negatively influenced the number of leaves, and reduced water and no nutrient applications interacted with the pollination treatments. Overall, our results indicate that the influences of pollination on fruit tree yield interact with the plant availability of nutrients and water and that excess pollination can reduce fruit quality and the production of leaves for photosynthesis. Such information is critical to understand how pollination influences fruit tree performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. List of Contributors
- Author
-
Abayomi, E.A., AghaKouchak, A., Ahmed, M., Akanda, A.S., Aneja, V.P., Annesi Maesano, I., Archer, S.R., Ayivor, J.S., Azad Hossain, A.K.M., Baldocchi, D., Barnard, L.T., Barros, A.P., Barthelmie, R.J., Bates, P., Beamon, B.M., Becker, D., Becker, R., Beckingham, A., Belhouchette, H., Best, K.M., Bestelmeyer, B.T., Betman, E., Blenckner, T., Blöschl, G., Boisvenue, C., Bolton, S., Borga, M., Booker, F., Borma, L.S., Bornstein, B., Brooks, M.L., Brown, J., Buckley, R., Burian, S.J., Burkle, L., Butler, C.D., Cardoso, M.F., Cecchi, L., Chapin, F.S., III, Chen, J., Chhetri, N., Chouinard, K., Christie, D., Chuluun, T., Cinderich, A.B., Clausen, N.-E., Cloke, H., Compton, J.E., Comrie, A.C., Convertino, M., Côté, I.M., Cull, T., Darko, D., Darling, E.S., Davis, M.A., Ddumba, S.D., De Felice, M., Degu, A.M., Dennis, R., Diaz, J.H., Doubler, D., D’Amato, G., Eilerts, G., Elmore, R.W., Emery, N., Fang, C.M., Fekete, B.M., Fong, L.P., Funk, C., Gall, H.E., Galvin, K.A., Gao, X., Gebregiorgis, A.S., Ghebreegziabhe, A.T., Giebel, G., Gimblett, H.R., Goldstein, J.H., Gonzalez Cruz, J., Gordon, C., Groisman, P.Y., Hajat, S., Hanna, E., Hanna, L., Hashizume, M., Havstad, K.M., He, Y., He, Z., Hill, B., Hoffman, M.T., Holcombe, T., Hossain, F., Hoverman, J.T., Hsu, K., Husak, G., Islam, S., Jha, S., Johnson, P.T.J., Joshi, A.K., Jules-Plag, S., Jutla, A.S., Kafatos, M., Kalyanapu, A.J., Karlsson, E.M., Katsman, C., Kiker, G.A., Kim, S.-H., Kimmerer, W., Kittel, T.G.F., Kjellstrom, T., Klein Tank, A., Knight, R.W., Koranteng, S., Kovats, S., Kremen, C., Lal, R., Lammers, R.B., Lange, M.A., Larsen, S.G., Lawler, J.J., Lemke, B., Lemos, M.C., Lenderink, G., LePoire, D.J., Le Quesne, C., Linkov, I., Liu, Z., Logan, L.H., López-Hoffman, L., Lowe, C., Luckman, B.H., Mahbubur Rahman, S.M., Mahiny, A.S., Manful, D., Mase, A.S., Masiokas, M.H., Mauget, S., Mensah, A.M., Mihaltcheva, S., Milewski, A., Miller, C.A., Mishra, V., Mitra, C., Modak, P., Moges, S.A., Mohanty, U.C., Molina, Y., Molloy, S.L., Monger, H.C., Montaña, E., Montanari, A., Munoz-Carpena, R., Nardi, F., Niiranen, S., Nikolic, J., Nishat, B., Niu, J., Niyogi, D., Nobre, C.A., Nukpezah, D., Ofori, B.D., Ojima, D.S., Okin, G.S., Olden, J.D., Otieno, F.O., Owens, P., Pabi, O., Papalexopoulos, A., Pappenberger, F., Park, J., Parkes, B., Paull, S.H., Pearce, T., Penna, D., Perdinan, Perry-Hill, R., Peters, D.P.C., Picon, R., Pillich, J., Pinson, P., Plag, H.-P., Pollyea, A.M., Powers, W., Prokopy, L.S., Pryor, S.C., Rango, A., Rao, M., Rao, P.S.C., Rashid, H., Rawade, Y.A., Ray, D.K., Renaud, A.L., Rodell, M., Rosenberg, A.A., Rowland, J., Rudek, J., Running, S.W., Ruti, P.M., Sailor, D.J., Sala, O.E., Samaras, Z., Sarafoglou, N., Schmitz, O.J., Scholes, R.J., Scott, D., Seastedt, T.R., Sequera, P., Shah-Newaz, S.M., Shakeela, A., Shepherd, J.M., Shiklomanov, A.I., Shinde, S.S., Shum, C.K., Siddique-E-Akbor, A.H.M., Smart, K., Smit, B., Smith, M.D., Soper, E.J., Sorooshian, S., Souissi, I., Spencer, B., Sreckovic, G., Steiger, R., Stohlgren, T.J., Sturchio, N., Suding, K.N., Sultan, M., Sun, L., Swain, D.K., Taub, D.R., te Linde, A., Temani, N., Thompson, L., Todd, S.W., Troccolli, A., Tsikalakis, A.G., Tuinstra, M.R., Tweedie, C.E., Tweneboah-Lawson, E., Tylianakis, J.M., Vaddella, V., van den Hurk, B., Venugopal, V., Verdin, J., Viglione, A., Villalba, R., Vincent, K., Vivoni, E.R., Voss, J.G., Vouitsis, I., Vrontisi, Z.N., Wahr, J., Walsh, T., Wang, X., Weaver, M.J., Wetterhall, F., Winkler, J.A., Woldemichael, A.T., Wood, A.W., Yan, E., Yigzaw, W., Yirenya-Tawiah, D., Young, D.R., Zaman, A.M., Zavalloni, C., Zhang, W., and Zolina, O.G.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Urban land use limits regional bumble bee gene flow.
- Author
-
Jha, Shalene and Kremen, C.
- Subjects
- *
URBAN land use , *BUMBLEBEES , *GENE flow , *POLLINATORS , *MICROSATELLITE repeats , *URBAN ecology , *INSECTS - Abstract
Potential declines in native pollinator communities and increased reliance on pollinator-dependent crops have raised concerns about native pollinator conservation and dispersal across human-altered landscapes. Bumble bees are one of the most effective native pollinators and are often the first to be extirpated in human-altered habitats, yet little is known about how bumble bees move across fine spatial scales and what landscapes promote or limit their gene flow. In this study, we examine regional genetic differentiation and fine-scale relatedness patterns of the yellow-faced bumble bee, Bombus vosnesenskii, to investigate how current and historic habitat composition impact gene flow. We conducted our study across a landscape mosaic of natural, agricultural and urban/suburban habitats, and we show that B. vosnesenskii exhibits low but significant levels of differentiation across the study system ( FST = 0.019, Dest = 0.049). Most importantly, we reveal significant relationships between pairwise FST and resistance models created from contemporary land use maps. Specifically, B. vosnesenskii gene flow is most limited by commercial, industrial and transportation-related impervious cover. Finally, our fine-scale analysis reveals significant but declining relatedness between individuals at the 1-9 km spatial scale, most likely due to local queen dispersal. Overall, our results indicate that B. vosnesenskii exhibits considerable local dispersal and that regional gene flow is significantly limited by impervious cover associated with urbanization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation
- Author
-
Kleijn, D, Winfree, R, Bartomeus, I, Carvalheiro, LG, Henry, M, Rufus Isaacs, R, Klein, AM, Kremen, C, Rader, R, Ricketts, TH, Williams, NM, Adamson, NL, Ascher, JS, Báldi, A, Batáry, P, Benjamin, F, Biesmeijer, JC, Blitzer, EJ, Bommarco, R, Brand, MR, Bretagnolle, V, Button, L, Cariveau, DP, Chifflet, R, Colville, JF, Danforth, BN, Elle, E, Garratt, MPD, Herzog, F, Holzschuh, A, Howlett, BG, Jauker, F, Jha, S, Knop, Eva, Krewenka, KM, Le Féon, V, Mandelik, Y, May, EA, Park, MG, Pisanty, G, Reemer, M, Riedinger, V, Rollin, O, Rundlöf, M, Sardiñas, HS, Scheper, J, Sciligo, AR, Smith, HG, Steffan-Dewenter, I, Thorp, T, Tscharntke, T, Verhulst, J, Viana, BF, Vaissière, BE, Veldtman, R, Westphal, C, Potts, SG, and M'Gonigle, Leithen K
- Subjects
2. Zero hunger ,fungi ,food and beverages ,570 Life sciences ,biology ,15. Life on land - Abstract
There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost-effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost-effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments.
23. The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: A quantitative synthesis
- Author
-
Albrecht, M, Kleijn, D, Williams, NM, Tschumi, M, Blaauw, BR, Bommarco, R, Campbell, AJ, Dainese, M, Drummond, FA, Entling, MH, Ganser, D, de Groot, GA, Goulson, D, Grab, H, Hamilton, H, Herzog, F, Isaacs, R, Jacot, K, Jeanneret, P, Jonsson, M, Knop, E, Kremen, C, Landis, DA, Loeb, GM, Marini, L, McKerchar, M, Morandin, L, Pfister, SC, Potts, SG, Rundlöf, M, Sardiñas, H, Sciligo, A, Thies, C, Tscharntke, T, Venturini, E, Veromann, E, Vollhardt, IMG, Wäckers, F, Ward, K, Wilby, A, Woltz, M, Wratten, S, and Sutter, L
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production
- Author
-
Dainese, M, Martin, EA, Aizen, MA, Albrecht, M, Bartomeus, I, Bommarco, R, Carvalheiro, LG, Chaplin-Kramer, R, Gagic, V, Garibaldi, LA, Ghazoul, J, Grab, H, Jonsson, M, Karp, DS, Kennedy, CM, Kleijn, D, Kremen, C, Landis, DA, Letourneau, DK, Marini, L, Poveda, K, Rader, R, Smith, HG, Tscharntke, T, Andersson, GKS, Badenhausser, I, Baensch, S, Bezerra, ADM, Bianchi, FJJA, Boreux, V, Bretagnolle, V, Caballero-Lopez, B, Cavigliasso, P, Ćetković, A, Chacoff, NP, Classen, A, Cusser, S, Da Silva E Silva, FD, de Groot, GA, Dudenhöffer, JH, Ekroos, J, Fijen, T, Franck, P, Freitas, BM, Garratt, MPD, Gratton, C, Hipólito, J, Holzschuh, A, Hunt, L, Iverson, AL, Jha, S, Keasar, T, Kim, TN, Kishinevsky, M, Klatt, BK, Klein, AM, Krewenka, KM, Krishnan, Smitha, Larsen, AE, Lavigne, C, Liere, H, Maas, B, Mallinger, RE, Pachon, EM, Martínez-Salinas, A, Meehan, TD, Mitchell, MGE, Molina, GAR, Nesper, M, Nilsson, L, O'Rourke, ME, Peters, MK, Plećaš, M, Potts, SG, Ramos, DDL, Rosenheim, JA, Rundlöf, M, Rusch, A, Sáez, A, Scheper, J, Schleuning, M, Schmack, JM, Sciligo, AR, Seymour, Colleen, Stanley, DA, Stewart, R, Stout, JC, Sutter, L, Takada, MB, Taki, H, Tamburini, G, Tschumi, M, Viana, BF, Westphal, C, Willcox, BK, Wratten, SD, Yoshioka, A, Zaragoza-Trello, C, Zhang, Wei, Zou, Yi, and Steffan-Dewenter, I
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. A cautious approach to subsidies for environmental sustainability.
- Author
-
Segerson K, Polasky S, Scheffer M, Sumaila UR, Cárdenas JC, Nyborg K, Fenichel EP, Anderies JM, Barrett S, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Crona B, Daily G, de Zeeuw A, Fischer J, Folke C, Kautsky N, Kremen C, Levin SA, Lindahl T, Pinsky ML, Tavoni A, Walker B, and Weber EU
- Abstract
Transformational change is possible, but design and implementation must seek to avoid lock-in.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Environmental impacts of genetically modified crops.
- Author
-
Noack F, Engist D, Gantois J, Gaur V, Hyjazie BF, Larsen A, M'Gonigle LK, Missirian A, Qaim M, Sargent RD, Souza-Rodrigues E, and Kremen C
- Subjects
- Humans, Pesticides toxicity, Pesticides adverse effects, Agriculture, Conservation of Natural Resources, Crops, Agricultural genetics, Plants, Genetically Modified adverse effects, Biodiversity, Environment
- Abstract
Genetically modified (GM) crops have been adopted by some of the world's leading agricultural nations, but the full extent of their environmental impact remains largely unknown. Although concerns regarding the direct environmental effects of GM crops have declined, GM crops have led to indirect changes in agricultural practices, including pesticide use, agricultural expansion, and cropping patterns, with profound environmental implications. Recent studies paint a nuanced picture of these environmental impacts, with mixed effects of GM crop adoption on biodiversity, deforestation, and human health that vary with the GM trait and geographic scale. New GM or gene-edited crops with different traits would likely have different environmental and human health impacts.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Joint environmental and social benefits from diversified agriculture.
- Author
-
Rasmussen LV, Grass I, Mehrabi Z, Smith OM, Bezner-Kerr R, Blesh J, Garibaldi LA, Isaac ME, Kennedy CM, Wittman H, Batáry P, Buchori D, Cerda R, Chará J, Crowder DW, Darras K, DeMaster K, Garcia K, Gómez M, Gonthier D, Guzman A, Hidayat P, Hipólito J, Hirons M, Hoey L, James D, John I, Jones AD, Karp DS, Kebede Y, Kerr CB, Klassen S, Kotowska M, Kreft H, Llanque R, Levers C, Lizcano DJ, Lu A, Madsen S, Marques RN, Martins PB, Melo A, Nyantakyi-Frimpong H, Olimpi EM, Owen JP, Pantevez H, Qaim M, Redlich S, Scherber C, Sciligo AR, Snapp S, Snyder WE, Steffan-Dewenter I, Stratton AE, Taylor JM, Tscharntke T, Valencia V, Vogel C, and Kremen C
- Subjects
- Humans, Farms, Soil, Agriculture, Biodiversity, Conservation of Natural Resources, Ecosystem
- Abstract
Agricultural simplification continues to expand at the expense of more diverse forms of agriculture. This simplification, for example, in the form of intensively managed monocultures, poses a risk to keeping the world within safe and just Earth system boundaries. Here, we estimated how agricultural diversification simultaneously affects social and environmental outcomes. Drawing from 24 studies in 11 countries across 2655 farms, we show how five diversification strategies focusing on livestock, crops, soils, noncrop plantings, and water conservation benefit social (e.g., human well-being, yields, and food security) and environmental (e.g., biodiversity, ecosystem services, and reduced environmental externalities) outcomes. We found that applying multiple diversification strategies creates more positive outcomes than individual management strategies alone. To realize these benefits, well-designed policies are needed to incentivize the adoption of multiple diversification strategies in unison.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Biodiversity-production feedback effects lead to intensification traps in agricultural landscapes.
- Author
-
Burian A, Kremen C, Wu JS, Beckmann M, Bulling M, Garibaldi LA, Krisztin T, Mehrabi Z, Ramankutty N, and Seppelt R
- Subjects
- Feedback, Biodiversity, Agriculture methods, Conservation of Natural Resources methods, Pesticides
- Abstract
Intensive agriculture with high reliance on pesticides and fertilizers constitutes a major strategy for 'feeding the world'. However, such conventional intensification is linked to diminishing returns and can result in 'intensification traps'-production declines triggered by the negative feedback of biodiversity loss at high input levels. Here we developed a novel framework that accounts for biodiversity feedback on crop yields to evaluate the risk and magnitude of intensification traps. Simulations grounded in systematic literature reviews showed that intensification traps emerge in most landscape types, but to a lesser extent in major cereal production systems. Furthermore, small reductions in maximal production (5-10%) could be frequently transmitted into substantial biodiversity gains, resulting in small-loss large-gain trade-offs prevailing across landscape types. However, sensitivity analyses revealed a strong context dependence of trap emergence, inducing substantial uncertainty in the identification of optimal management at the field scale. Hence, we recommend the development of case-specific safety margins for intensification preventing double losses in biodiversity and food security associated with intensification traps., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. How does framing influence preference for multiple solutions to societal problems?
- Author
-
Wu JS, Kremen C, and Zhao J
- Abstract
Solutions to environmental and social problems are often framed in dichotomous ways, which can be counterproductive. Instead, multiple solutions are often needed to fully address these problems. Here we examine how framing influences people's preference for multiple solutions. In a pre-registered experiment, participants (N = 1,432) were randomly assigned to one of four framing conditions. In the first three conditions, participants were presented with a series of eight problems, each framed with multiple causes, multiple impacts, or multiple solutions to the problem. The control condition did not present any framing information. Participants indicated their preferred solution, perceived severity and urgency of the problem, and their dichotomous thinking tendency. Pre-registered analyses showed that none of the three frames had a significant impact on preference for multiple solutions, perceived severity, perceived urgency, or dichotomous thinking. However, exploratory analyses showed that perceived severity and urgency of the problem were positively correlated with people's preference for multiple solutions, while dichotomous thinking was negatively correlated. These findings showed no demonstrable impact of framing on multi-solution preference. Future interventions should focus on addressing perceived severity and urgency, or decreasing dichotomous thinking to encourage people to adopt multiple solutions to address complex environmental and social problems., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Exploring scenarios for the food system-zoonotic risk interface.
- Author
-
Shepon A, Wu T, Kremen C, Dayan T, Perfecto I, Fanzo J, Eshel G, and Golden CD
- Subjects
- Animals, Humans, Pandemics, Zoonoses epidemiology, Animals, Wild, COVID-19, Communicable Diseases, Emerging epidemiology
- Abstract
The unprecedented economic and health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have shown the global necessity of mitigating the underlying drivers of zoonotic spillover events, which occur at the human-wildlife and domesticated animal interface. Spillover events are associated to varying degrees with high habitat fragmentation, biodiversity loss through land use change, high livestock densities, agricultural inputs, and wildlife hunting-all facets of food systems. As such, the structure and characteristics of food systems can be considered key determinants of modern pandemic risks. This means that emerging infectious diseases should be more explicitly addressed in the discourse of food systems to mitigate the likelihood and impacts of spillover events. Here, we adopt a scenario framework to highlight the many connections among food systems, zoonotic diseases, and sustainability. We identify two overarching dimensions: the extent of land use for food production and the agricultural practices employed that shape four archetypal food systems, each with a distinct risk profile with respect to zoonotic spillovers and differing dimensions of sustainability. Prophylactic measures to curb the emergence of zoonotic diseases are therefore closely linked to diets and food policies. Future research directions should explore more closely how they impact the risk of spillover events., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Common pesticides disrupt critical ecological interactions.
- Author
-
Sargent RD, Carrillo J, and Kremen C
- Subjects
- Ecosystem, Pesticides toxicity, Pesticides analysis
- Abstract
Critical ecological interactions can be disrupted by pesticides, leading to serious ecosystem and economic harm. For the most part, however, the extent and magnitude of these impacts are unknown. We argue for increased investigation of ecosystem impacts of common pesticides by scientists and scrutiny by regulators., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests No interests are declared., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Farm size affects the use of agroecological practices on organic farms in the United States.
- Author
-
Liebert J, Benner R, Bezner Kerr R, Björkman T, De Master KT, Gennet S, Gómez MI, Hart AK, Kremen C, Power AG, and Ryan MR
- Subjects
- Farmers, Farms, Humans, United States, Agriculture methods, Organic Agriculture
- Abstract
Organic agriculture outperforms conventional agriculture across several sustainability metrics due, in part, to more widespread use of agroecological practices. However, increased entry of large-scale farms into the organic sector has prompted concerns about 'conventionalization' through input substitution, agroecosystem simplification and other changes. We examined this shift in organic agriculture by estimating the use of agroecological practices across farm size and comparing indicators of conventionalization. Results from our national survey of 542 organic fruit and vegetable farmers show that fewer agroecological practices were used on large farms, which also exhibited the greatest degree of conventionalization. Intercropping, insectary plantings and border plantings were at least 1.4 times more likely to be used on small (0.4-39 cropland ha) compared with large (≥405 cropland ha) farms, whereas reduced tillage was less likely and riparian buffers were more likely on small compared with medium (40-404 cropland ha) farms. Because decisions about management practices can drive environmental sustainability outcomes, policy should support small and medium farms that already use agroecological practices while encouraging increased use of agroecological practices on larger farms., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Interactive effects of multiscale diversification practices on farmland bird stress.
- Author
-
Olimpi EM, Daly H, Garcia K, Glynn VM, Gonthier DJ, Kremen C, M'Gonigle LK, and Karp DS
- Subjects
- Agriculture, Animals, Ecosystem, Farms, Biodiversity, Conservation of Natural Resources methods
- Abstract
Farmland diversification practices (i.e., methods used to produce food sustainably by enhancing biodiversity in cropping systems) are sometimes considered beneficial to both agriculture and biodiversity, but most studies of these practices rely on species richness, diversity, or abundance as a proxy for habitat quality. Biodiversity assessments may miss early clues that populations are imperiled when species presence does not imply persistence. Physiological stress indicators may help identify low-quality habitats before population declines occur. We explored how avian stress indicators respond to on-farm management practices and surrounding seminatural area (1-km radius) across 21 California strawberry farms. We examined whether commonly used biodiversity metrics correlate with stress responses in wild birds. We used ∼1000 blood and feather samples and body mass and wing chord measurements, mostly from passerines, to test the effects of diversification practices on four physiological stress indicators: heterophil to lymphocyte ratios (H:L), body condition, hematocrit values, and feather growth rates of individual birds. We then tested the relationship between physiological stress indicators and species richness, abundance, occurrence, and diversity derived from 285 bird point count surveys. After accounting for other biological drivers, landscape context mediated the effect of local farm management on H:L and body condition. Local diversification practices were associated with reduced individual stress in intensive agricultural landscapes but increased it in landscapes surrounded by relatively more seminatural area. Feathers grew more slowly in landscapes dominated by strawberry production, suggesting that nutritional condition was lower here than in landscapes with more crop types and seminatural areas. We found scant evidence that species richness, abundance, occurrence, or diversity metrics were correlated with the individual's physiological stress, suggesting that reliance on these metrics may obscure the impacts of management on species persistence. Our findings underscore the importance of considering landscape context when designing local management strategies to promote wildlife conservation., (© 2022 Society for Conservation Biology.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Pesticide exposure of wild bees and honey bees foraging from field border flowers in intensively managed agriculture areas.
- Author
-
Ward LT, Hladik ML, Guzman A, Winsemius S, Bautista A, Kremen C, and Mills NJ
- Subjects
- Agriculture methods, Animals, Bees, Flowers, Pollination, Soil, Pesticide Residues analysis, Pesticides analysis
- Abstract
Bees are critical for food crop pollination, yet their populations are declining as agricultural practices intensify. Pollinator-attractive field border plantings (e.g. hedgerows and forb strips) can increase bee diversity and abundance in agricultural areas; however, recent studies suggest these plants may contain pesticides. Pesticide exposure for wild bees remains largely unknown; however, this information is needed to inform agricultural practices and pesticide regulations meant to protect bees. It is important to determine whether border plantings that attract and support pollinators may also deliver pesticides to them. In this study, we collected various samples for pesticide residue analysis, including: multiple species of wild bees, honey bees, flowers from four types of bee-attractive field border plants, and soil. Silicone bands were also utilized as passive aerial samplers of pesticide residues. The five pesticides detected most frequently across all samples were the insecticide bifenthrin, the herbicides thiobencarb, metolaclor, and propanil, and the fungicide fluopyram. We detected the greatest number of parent pesticides in bands (24), followed by soil (21). Pesticides were also detected in field border plant flowers (16), which do not receive direct pesticide applications, and included many products which were not applied to adjacent field crops. Pesticide concentrations were lower in bees than in flowers but higher in bees than in soils. Pesticide residue per bee (ng/bee) increased with increasing wild bee size, though pesticide concentration (ng/g) did not increase. While honey bees and wild bees contained a similar number and concentration of pesticides overall, pesticide mixtures varied by bee type, and included some mixtures known to cause sublethal effects. The results from this study highlight the benefits of measuring more sample types to capture the total exposome of bees, including a greater range of bee species, as well as the need to consider exposure to pesticides at the landscape level., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Dietary patterns of a versatile large carnivore, the puma ( Puma concolor ).
- Author
-
Karandikar H, Serota MW, Sherman WC, Green JR, Verta G, Kremen C, and Middleton AD
- Abstract
Large carnivores play critical roles in terrestrial ecosystems but have suffered dramatic range contractions over the past two centuries. Developing an accurate understanding of large carnivore diets is an important first step towards an improved understanding of their ecological roles and addressing the conservation challenges faced by these species.The puma is one of seven large felid species in the world and the only one native to the non-tropical regions of the New World. We conducted a meta-analysis of puma diets across the species' range in the Americas and assessed the impact of varying environmental conditions, niche roles, and human activity on puma diets. Pumas displayed remarkable dietary flexibility, consuming at least 232 different prey species, including one Critically Endangered and five Endangered species.Our meta-analysis found clear patterns in puma diets with changing habitat and environmental conditions. Pumas consumed more larger-bodied prey species with increasing distance from the equator, but consumption of medium-sized species showed the opposite trend.Puma diets varied with their realized niche; however, contrary to our expectations, puma consumption of large species did not change with their trophic position, and pumas consumed more small prey and birds as apex predators. Consumption of domestic species was negatively correlated with consumption of medium-sized wild species, a finding which underscores the importance of maintaining intact native prey assemblages.The tremendous dietary flexibility displayed by pumas represents both an opportunity and a challenge for understanding the puma's role in ecosystems and for the species' management and conservation. Future studies should explore the linkages between availability and selection of primary and other wild prey, and consequent impacts on predation of domestic species, in order to guide conservation actions and reduce conflict between pumas and people., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. A Framework on Polarization, Cognitive Inflexibility, and Rigid Cognitive Specialization.
- Author
-
Wu JS, Hauert C, Kremen C, and Zhao J
- Abstract
Polarization is pervasive in the current sociopolitical discourse. Polarization tends to increase cognitive inflexibility where people become less capable of updating their beliefs upon new information or switching between different ways of thinking. Cognitive inflexibility can in turn increase polarization. We propose that this positive feedback loop between polarization and cognitive inflexibility is a form of threat response that has benefited humans throughout their evolutionary history. This feedback loop, which can be driven by conflict mindset, group conformity, and simplification of information, facilitates the formation of strong bonds within a group that are able to eliminate threats and increase individual fitness. Although cognitive inflexibility is conventionally seen as maladaptive, here we argue that cognitive inflexibility may be an adaptation under polarization. That is, in a highly polarized society most people only interact with members of their own social group, without having to confront perspectives from another group or interacting with out-group members. In this context, cognitive inflexibility creates rigid cognitive specialization, a set of cognitive traits that allow people to operate efficiently within their social circles but not outside of it. Although rigid cognitive specialization benefits individuals in the short term, it may lead to more polarization over the long run, and thus produce more conflict between groups. We call on future research to examine the link between cognitive inflexibility and rigid cognitive specialization., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wu, Hauert, Kremen and Zhao.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. CropPol: A dynamic, open and global database on crop pollination.
- Author
-
Allen-Perkins A, Magrach A, Dainese M, Garibaldi LA, Kleijn D, Rader R, Reilly JR, Winfree R, Lundin O, McGrady CM, Brittain C, Biddinger DJ, Artz DR, Elle E, Hoffman G, Ellis JD, Daniels J, Gibbs J, Campbell JW, Brokaw J, Wilson JK, Mason K, Ward KL, Gundersen KB, Bobiwash K, Gut L, Rowe LM, Boyle NK, Williams NM, Joshi NK, Rothwell N, Gillespie RL, Isaacs R, Fleischer SJ, Peterson SS, Rao S, Pitts-Singer TL, Fijen T, Boreux V, Rundlöf M, Viana BF, Klein AM, Smith HG, Bommarco R, Carvalheiro LG, Ricketts TH, Ghazoul J, Krishnan S, Benjamin FE, Loureiro J, Castro S, Raine NE, de Groot GA, Horgan FG, Hipólito J, Smagghe G, Meeus I, Eeraerts M, Potts SG, Kremen C, García D, Miñarro M, Crowder DW, Pisanty G, Mandelik Y, Vereecken NJ, Leclercq N, Weekers T, Lindstrom SAM, Stanley DA, Zaragoza-Trello C, Nicholson CC, Scheper J, Rad C, Marks EAN, Mota L, Danforth B, Park M, Bezerra ADM, Freitas BM, Mallinger RE, Oliveira da Silva F, Willcox B, Ramos DL, D da Silva E Silva F, Lázaro A, Alomar D, González-Estévez MA, Taki H, Cariveau DP, Garratt MPD, Nabaes Jodar DN, Stewart RIA, Ariza D, Pisman M, Lichtenberg EM, Schüepp C, Herzog F, Entling MH, Dupont YL, Michener CD, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Burns KLW, Vilà M, Robson A, Howlett B, Blechschmidt L, Jauker F, Schwarzbach F, Nesper M, Diekötter T, Wolters V, Castro H, Gaspar H, Nault BA, Badenhausser I, Petersen JD, Tscharntke T, Bretagnolle V, Willis Chan DS, Chacoff N, Andersson GKS, Jha S, Colville JF, Veldtman R, Coutinho J, Bianchi FJJA, Sutter L, Albrecht M, Jeanneret P, Zou Y, Averill AL, Saez A, Sciligo AR, Vergara CH, Bloom EH, Oeller E, Badano EI, Loeb GM, Grab H, Ekroos J, Gagic V, Cunningham SA, Åström J, Cavigliasso P, Trillo A, Classen A, Mauchline AL, Montero-Castaño A, Wilby A, Woodcock BA, Sidhu CS, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vogiatzakis IN, Herrera JM, Otieno M, Gikungu MW, Cusser SJ, Nauss T, Nilsson L, Knapp J, Ortega-Marcos JJ, González JA, Osborne JL, Blanche R, Shaw RF, Hevia V, Stout J, Arthur AD, Blochtein B, Szentgyorgyi H, Li J, Mayfield MM, Woyciechowski M, Nunes-Silva P, Halinski de Oliveira R, Henry S, Simmons BI, Dalsgaard B, Hansen K, Sritongchuay T, O'Reilly AD, Chamorro García FJ, Nates Parra G, Magalhães Pigozo C, and Bartomeus I
- Subjects
- Animals, Bees, Crops, Agricultural, Flowers, Insecta, Ecosystem, Pollination
- Abstract
Seventy five percent of the world's food crops benefit from insect pollination. Hence, there has been increased interest in how global change drivers impact this critical ecosystem service. Because standardized data on crop pollination are rarely available, we are limited in our capacity to understand the variation in pollination benefits to crop yield, as well as to anticipate changes in this service, develop predictions, and inform management actions. Here, we present CropPol, a dynamic, open, and global database on crop pollination. It contains measurements recorded from 202 crop studies, covering 3,394 field observations, 2,552 yield measurements (i.e., berry mass, number of fruits, and fruit density [kg/ha], among others), and 47,752 insect records from 48 commercial crops distributed around the globe. CropPol comprises 32 of the 87 leading global crops and commodities that are pollinator dependent. Malus domestica is the most represented crop (32 studies), followed by Brassica napus (22 studies), Vaccinium corymbosum (13 studies), and Citrullus lanatus (12 studies). The most abundant pollinator guilds recorded are honey bees (34.22% counts), bumblebees (19.19%), flies other than Syrphidae and Bombyliidae (13.18%), other wild bees (13.13%), beetles (10.97%), Syrphidae (4.87%), and Bombyliidae (0.05%). Locations comprise 34 countries distributed among Europe (76 studies), North America (60), Latin America and the Caribbean (29), Asia (20), Oceania (10), and Africa (7). Sampling spans three decades and is concentrated on 2001-2005 (21 studies), 2006-2010 (40), 2011-2015 (88), and 2016-2020 (50). This is the most comprehensive open global data set on measurements of crop flower visitors, crop pollinators and pollination to date, and we encourage researchers to add more datasets to this database in the future. This data set is released for non-commercial use only. Credits should be given to this paper (i.e., proper citation), and the products generated with this database should be shared under the same license terms (CC BY-NC-SA)., (© 2021 The Ecological Society of America.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Building effective policies to conserve pollinators: translating knowledge into policy.
- Author
-
Gemmill-Herren B, Garibaldi LA, Kremen C, and Ngo HT
- Subjects
- Animals, Policy, Agriculture, Pollination
- Abstract
Pollination management recommendations are becoming increasingly precise, context-specific and knowledge-intensive. Pollination is a service delivered across landscapes, entailing policy constructs across agricultural landscapes. Diversified farming practices effectively promote pollination services. Yet it remains difficult to secure large-scale uptake by farming communities. A strong foundation upon which to base policy formulation stems from respecting the perspective of farmers and local communities on the need to conserve pollinators, alongside scientific understanding. Ecological intensification resonates with both indigenous knowledge, local communities and scientific understanding. It emphasizes that the regulating functions of nature require both landscape-level agroecosystem design and recognition of the complexity of agricultural systems. Facilitating ecological intensification across landscapes requires collective decision-making, with institutional innovation in local structures and food system governance., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Crop diversity enriches arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in an intensive agricultural landscape.
- Author
-
Guzman A, Montes M, Hutchins L, DeLaCerda G, Yang P, Kakouridis A, Dahlquist-Willard RM, Firestone MK, Bowles T, and Kremen C
- Subjects
- Agriculture, Plant Roots, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Mycobiome, Mycorrhizae
- Abstract
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are keystone symbionts of agricultural soils but agricultural intensification has negatively impacted AMF communities. Increasing crop diversity could ameliorate some of these impacts by positively affecting AMF. However, the underlying relationship between plant diversity and AMF community composition has not been fully resolved. We examined how greater crop diversity affected AMF across farms in an intensive agricultural landscape, defined by high nutrient input, low crop diversity and high tillage frequency. We assessed AMF communities across 31 field sites that were either monocultures or polycultures (growing > 20 different crop types) in three ways: richness, diversity and composition. We also determined root colonization across these sites. We found that polycultures drive the available AMF community into richer and more diverse communities while soil properties structure AMF community composition. AMF root colonization did not vary by farm management (monocultures vs polycultures), but did vary by crop host. We demonstrate that crop diversity enriches AMF communities, counteracting the negative effects of agricultural intensification on AMF, providing the potential to increase agroecosystem functioning and sustainability., (© 2021 The Authors New Phytologist © 2021 New Phytologist Foundation.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Time to Integrate Pollinator Science into Soybean Production.
- Author
-
Garibaldi LA, Schulte LA, Nabaes Jodar DN, Gomez Carella DS, and Kremen C
- Subjects
- Agriculture, Bees, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Pollination, Crops, Agricultural, Glycine max
- Abstract
Soybeans cover 129 million hectares globally. Soybean productivity can increase with pollinator management, but soybean cultivation practices commonly ignore biotic pollination. If pollinator habitats are created within soybean landscapes and policies to limit agricultural expansion are implemented, millions of hectares could be restored for biodiversity without loss of soybean production., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Pollinator interaction flexibility across scales affects patch colonization and occupancy.
- Author
-
Gaiarsa MP, Kremen C, and Ponisio LC
- Subjects
- Symbiosis, Ecosystem, Environment
- Abstract
Global change alters ecological communities and may disrupt ecological interactions and the provision of ecosystem functions. As ecological communities respond to global change, species may either go locally extinct or form novel interactions. To date, few studies have assessed how flexible species are in their interaction patterns, mainly due to the scarcity of data spanning long time series. Using a ten-year species-level dataset on the assembly of mutualistic networks from the Central Valley in California, we test whether interaction flexibility affects pollinators' colonization and persistence and their resulting habitat occupancy in a highly modified landscape. We propose three metrics of interaction flexibility associated with different scales of organization within ecological communities and explore which species' traits affect them. Our results provide empirical evidence linking species' ability to colonize habitat patches across a landscape to the role they play in networks. Phenological breadth and body size had contrasting effects on interaction flexibility. We demonstrate the relationship between mutualistic networks and species' ability to colonize and persist in the landscape, suggesting interaction flexibility as a potential mechanism for communities to maintain ecosystem function despite changes in community composition.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Integrating high-speed videos in capture-mark-recapture studies of insects.
- Author
-
Khelifa R, Mahdjoub H, M'Gonigle LK, and Kremen C
- Abstract
Capture-mark-recapture (CMR) studies have been used extensively in ecology and evolution. While it is feasible to apply CMR in some animals, it is considerably more challenging in small fast-moving species such as insects. In these groups, low recapture rates can bias estimates of demographic parameters, thereby handicapping effective analysis and management of wild populations. Here, we use high-speed videos (HSV) to capture two large dragonfly species, Anax junius and Rhionaeschna multicolor , that rarely land and, thus, are particularly challenging for CMR studies. We test whether HSV, compared to conventional "eye" observations, increases the "resighting" rates and, consequently, improves estimates of both survival rates and the effects of demographic covariates on survival. We show that the use of HSV increases the number of resights by 64% in A. junius and 48% in R. multicolor . HSV improved our estimates of resighting and survival probability which were either under- or overestimated with the conventional observations. Including HSV improved credible intervals for resighting rate and survival probability by 190% and 130% in A. junius and R. multicolor , respectively. Hence, it has the potential to open the door to a wide range of research possibilities on species that are traditionally difficult to monitor with distance sampling, including within insects and birds., Competing Interests: The authors have no competing interests, financial or otherwise, to declare., (© 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Agricultural diversification promotes multiple ecosystem services without compromising yield.
- Author
-
Tamburini G, Bommarco R, Wanger TC, Kremen C, van der Heijden MGA, Liebman M, and Hallin S
- Abstract
Enhancing biodiversity in cropping systems is suggested to promote ecosystem services, thereby reducing dependency on agronomic inputs while maintaining high crop yields. We assess the impact of several diversification practices in cropping systems on above- and belowground biodiversity and ecosystem services by reviewing 98 meta-analyses and performing a second-order meta-analysis based on 5160 original studies comprising 41,946 comparisons between diversified and simplified practices. Overall, diversification enhances biodiversity, pollination, pest control, nutrient cycling, soil fertility, and water regulation without compromising crop yields. Practices targeting aboveground biodiversity boosted pest control and water regulation, while those targeting belowground biodiversity enhanced nutrient cycling, soil fertility, and water regulation. Most often, diversification practices resulted in win-win support of services and crop yields. Variability in responses and occurrence of trade-offs highlight the context dependency of outcomes. Widespread adoption of diversification practices shows promise to contribute to biodiversity conservation and food security from local to global scales., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: a quantitative synthesis.
- Author
-
Albrecht M, Kleijn D, Williams NM, Tschumi M, Blaauw BR, Bommarco R, Campbell AJ, Dainese M, Drummond FA, Entling MH, Ganser D, Arjen de Groot G, Goulson D, Grab H, Hamilton H, Herzog F, Isaacs R, Jacot K, Jeanneret P, Jonsson M, Knop E, Kremen C, Landis DA, Loeb GM, Marini L, McKerchar M, Morandin L, Pfister SC, Potts SG, Rundlöf M, Sardiñas H, Sciligo A, Thies C, Tscharntke T, Venturini E, Veromann E, Vollhardt IMG, Wäckers F, Ward K, Westbury DB, Wilby A, Woltz M, Wratten S, and Sutter L
- Subjects
- Agriculture, Bees, Biodiversity, Europe, Flowers, New Zealand, North America, Pest Control, Ecosystem, Pollination
- Abstract
Floral plantings are promoted to foster ecological intensification of agriculture through provisioning of ecosystem services. However, a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of different floral plantings, their characteristics and consequences for crop yield is lacking. Here we quantified the impacts of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control (18 studies) and pollination services (17 studies) in adjacent crops in North America, Europe and New Zealand. Flower strips, but not hedgerows, enhanced pest control services in adjacent fields by 16% on average. However, effects on crop pollination and yield were more variable. Our synthesis identifies several important drivers of variability in effectiveness of plantings: pollination services declined exponentially with distance from plantings, and perennial and older flower strips with higher flowering plant diversity enhanced pollination more effectively. These findings provide promising pathways to optimise floral plantings to more effectively contribute to ecosystem service delivery and ecological intensification of agriculture in the future., (© 2020 The Authors. Ecology Letters published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Ecological intensification and diversification approaches to maintain biodiversity, ecosystem services and food production in a changing world.
- Author
-
Kremen C
- Subjects
- Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Crops, Agricultural, Farms, Fertilizers, Food Supply, Humans, Insecta, Pollination, Biodiversity, Crop Production, Ecosystem
- Abstract
How do we redesign agricultural landscapes to maintain their productivity and profitability, while promoting rather than eradicating biodiversity, and regenerating rather than undermining the ecological processes that sustain food production and are vital for a liveable planet? Ecological intensification harnesses ecological processes to increase food production per area through management processes that often diversify croplands to support beneficial organisms supplying these services. By adding more diverse vegetation back into landscapes, the agricultural matrix can also become both more habitable and more permeable to biodiversity, aiding in conserving biodiversity over time. By reducing the need for costly inputs while maintaining productivity, ecological intensification methods can maintain or even enhance profitability. As shown with several examples, ecological intensification and diversification can assist in creating multifunctional landscapes that are more environmentally and economically sustainable. While single methods of ecological intensification can be incorporated into large-scale industrial farms and reduce negative impacts, complete redesign of such systems using multiple methods of ecological intensification and diversification can create truly regenerative systems with strong potential to promote food production and biodiversity. However, the broad adoption of these methods will require transformative socio-economic changes because many structural barriers continue to maintain the current agrichemical model of agriculture., (© 2020 The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Integrating agroecological production in a robust post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework.
- Author
-
Wanger TC, DeClerck F, Garibaldi LA, Ghazoul J, Kleijn D, Klein AM, Kremen C, Mooney H, Perfecto I, Powell LL, Settele J, Solé M, Tscharntke T, and Weisser W
- Subjects
- Biodiversity, Conservation of Natural Resources
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production.
- Author
-
Dainese M, Martin EA, Aizen MA, Albrecht M, Bartomeus I, Bommarco R, Carvalheiro LG, Chaplin-Kramer R, Gagic V, Garibaldi LA, Ghazoul J, Grab H, Jonsson M, Karp DS, Kennedy CM, Kleijn D, Kremen C, Landis DA, Letourneau DK, Marini L, Poveda K, Rader R, Smith HG, Tscharntke T, Andersson GKS, Badenhausser I, Baensch S, Bezerra ADM, Bianchi FJJA, Boreux V, Bretagnolle V, Caballero-Lopez B, Cavigliasso P, Ćetković A, Chacoff NP, Classen A, Cusser S, da Silva E Silva FD, de Groot GA, Dudenhöffer JH, Ekroos J, Fijen T, Franck P, Freitas BM, Garratt MPD, Gratton C, Hipólito J, Holzschuh A, Hunt L, Iverson AL, Jha S, Keasar T, Kim TN, Kishinevsky M, Klatt BK, Klein AM, Krewenka KM, Krishnan S, Larsen AE, Lavigne C, Liere H, Maas B, Mallinger RE, Martinez Pachon E, Martínez-Salinas A, Meehan TD, Mitchell MGE, Molina GAR, Nesper M, Nilsson L, O'Rourke ME, Peters MK, Plećaš M, Potts SG, Ramos DL, Rosenheim JA, Rundlöf M, Rusch A, Sáez A, Scheper J, Schleuning M, Schmack JM, Sciligo AR, Seymour C, Stanley DA, Stewart R, Stout JC, Sutter L, Takada MB, Taki H, Tamburini G, Tschumi M, Viana BF, Westphal C, Willcox BK, Wratten SD, Yoshioka A, Zaragoza-Trello C, Zhang W, Zou Y, and Steffan-Dewenter I
- Subjects
- Agriculture methods, Biodiversity, Crop Production methods, Ecosystem, Humans, Pest Control, Biological methods, Pollination physiology, Crops, Agricultural metabolism, Crops, Agricultural physiology
- Abstract
Human land use threatens global biodiversity and compromises multiple ecosystem functions critical to food production. Whether crop yield-related ecosystem services can be maintained by a few dominant species or rely on high richness remains unclear. Using a global database from 89 studies (with 1475 locations), we partition the relative importance of species richness, abundance, and dominance for pollination; biological pest control; and final yields in the context of ongoing land-use change. Pollinator and enemy richness directly supported ecosystem services in addition to and independent of abundance and dominance. Up to 50% of the negative effects of landscape simplification on ecosystem services was due to richness losses of service-providing organisms, with negative consequences for crop yields. Maintaining the biodiversity of ecosystem service providers is therefore vital to sustain the flow of key agroecosystem benefits to society., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Proximity of restored hedgerows interacts with local floral diversity and species' traits to shape long-term pollinator metacommunity dynamics.
- Author
-
Ponisio LC, de Valpine P, M'Gonigle LK, and Kremen C
- Subjects
- Animals, Bees, Flowers, Population Dynamics, Agriculture, Biodiversity, Ecosystem
- Abstract
Disconnected habitat fragments are poor at supporting population and community persistence; restoration ecologists, therefore, advocate for the establishment of habitat networks across landscapes. Few empirical studies, however, have considered how networks of restored habitat patches affect metacommunity dynamics. Here, using a 10-year study on restored hedgerows and unrestored field margins within an intensive agricultural landscape, we integrate occupancy modelling with network theory to examine the interaction between local and landscape characteristics, habitat selection and dispersal in shaping pollinator metacommunity dynamics. We show that surrounding hedgerows and remnant habitat patches interact with the local floral diversity, bee diet breadth and bee body size to influence site occupancy, via colonisation and persistence dynamics. Florally diverse sites and generalist, small-bodied species are most important for maintaining metacommunity connectivity. By providing the first in-depth assessment of how a network of restored habitat influences long-term population dynamics, we confirm the conservation benefit of hedgerows for pollinator populations and demonstrate the importance of restoring and maintaining habitat networks within an inhospitable matrix., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Response.
- Author
-
Kremen C and Merenlender A
- Subjects
- Conservation of Natural Resources
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Pollination Requirements of Almond (Prunus dulcis): Combining Laboratory and Field Experiments.
- Author
-
Henselek Y, Eilers EJ, Kremen C, Hendrix SD, and Klein AM
- Subjects
- Animals, Flowers physiology, Pollen physiology, Bees physiology, Diptera physiology, Pollination, Prunus dulcis physiology
- Abstract
Almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D. A. Webb; Rosales: Rosaceae) is a cash crop with an estimated global value of over seven billion U.S. dollars annually and commercial varieties are highly dependent on insect pollination. Therefore, the understanding of basic pollination requirements of the main varieties including pollination efficiency of honey bees (Apis mellifera, Linnaeus, Hymenoptera: Apidae) and wild pollinators is essential for almond production. We first conducted two lab experiments to examine the threshold number of pollen grains needed for successful pollination and to determine if varietal identity or diversity promotes fruit set and weight. Further, we examined stigma and ovules of flowers visited by Apis and non-Apis pollinators in the field to study the proportion of almond to non-almond pollen grains deposited, visitation time per flower visit, and tube set. Results indicate that the threshold for successful fertilization is around 60 pollen grains, but pollen can be from any compatible variety as neither pollen varietal identity nor diversity enhanced fruit set or weight. Andrena cerasifolii Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) was a more effective pollinator on a per single visit basis than Apis and syrphid flies. Nevertheless, Apis was more efficient than A. cerasifolii and syrphid flies as they spent less time on a flower during a single visit. Hence, planting with two compatible varieties and managing for both Apis and non-Apis pollinators is likely to be an optimal strategy for farmers to secure high and stable pollination success.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.