Search

One of the most important aspects of livestock is the supply of essential quantities of balanced nutrients manufacture. In several physiological functions of nutrients, concerning organisms, protein has an important role. Ruminants are not wholly protected of amino acids by microflora degradation of animal feed sources and by maintaining proteins from the breakdown in the rumen where both high and medium yielding ruminant amino acids are required, they must be met; therefore, rumen-protected protein (RPP) dietary supplementation, including primarily rumen-protected protein (RPP), methionine (RPMeth), protected from rumen flora, it was necessary. Numerous scientists are attracted in the study of the character of (RPMeth) in a dairy cow about it’s an impact on milk produce, growth rate, N- efficiency, coefficient digestibility, intake of DM. Unluckily, the findings obtained from many RPMeth investigations showed excessive fluctuation results in ruminant nutrition between its helpful and useless influence, specifically during early and late lactation periods. Thus, for ruminants, when they use this review post, farm owners may be careful when they are plan to apply RPMeth to the diet of animals. In summary, supplementation RPMeth also has a positive balanced effect, even with no detrimental effect on the yield of milk, animal productivity and hemato-biochemical parameters, especially during the early lactation when used with a ruminant diet low in crude protein

Copyright of Strahlentherapie und Onkologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract Neurocognitive impairment is being increasingly recognized as an important issue in patients with cancer who develop cognitive difficulties either as part of direct or indirect involvement of the nervous system or as a consequence of either chemotherapy-related or radiotherapy-related complications. Brain radiotherapy in particular can lead to significant cognitive defects. Neurocognitive decline adversely affects quality of life, meaningful employment, and even simple daily activities. Neuroprotection may be a viable and realistic goal in preventing neurocognitive sequelae in these patients, especially in the setting of cranial irradiation. Lithium is an agent that has been in use for psychiatric disorders for decades, but recently there has been emerging evidence that it can have a neuroprotective effect. This review discusses neurocognitive impairment in patients with cancer and the potential for investigating the use of lithium as a neuroprotectant in such patients.

Identification of immunogenic cancer neoantigens as targets for therapy is challenging. Here, we integrate the whole-genome and long-read transcript sequencing of cancers to identify the collection of neo-open reading frame peptides (NOP) expressed in tumors. We termed this collection of NOPs the tumor framome. NOPs represent tumor-specific peptides that are different from wild-type proteins and may be strongly immunogenic. We describe a class of hidden NOPs that derive from structural genomic variants involving an upstream protein coding gene driving expression and translation of noncoding regions of the genome downstream of a rearrangement breakpoint, i.e., where no gene annotation or evidence for transcription exists. The entire collection of NOPs represents a vast number of possible neoantigens particularly in tumors with many structural genomic variants and a low number of missense mutations. We show that NOPs are immunogenic and epitopes derived from NOPs can bind to MHC class I molecules. Finally, we provide evidence for the presence of memory T cells specific for hidden NOPs in peripheral blood from a patient with lung cancer. This work highlights NOPs as a major source of possible neoantigens for personalized cancer immunotherapy and provides a rationale for analyzing the complete cancer genome and transcriptome as a basis for the detection of NOPs., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose of Review: This manuscript will update prior reviews of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in light of basic science, translational, and clinical discoveries in the field of cancer immunology and aging., Recent Findings: ICIs have led to significant advancements in the treatment of cancer. Landmark trials of ICIs have cited the efficacy and toxicity experienced by older patients, but most trials are not specifically designed to address outcomes in older patients. Underlying mechanisms of aging, like cellular senescence, affect the immune system and may ultimately alter the host's response to ICIs. Validated tools are currently used to identify older adults who may be at greater risk of developing complications from their cancer treatment. We review changes in the aging immune system that may alter responses to ICIs, report outcomes and toxicities in older adults from recent ICI clinical trials, and discuss clinical tools specific to older patients with cancer., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Nearly 60% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with metastatic disease, and approximately 20% have brain metastases (BrMs) at diagnosis. During the disease course, 25-50% of patients will develop BrMs. Despite available treatments, survival rates for patients with NSCLC and BrMs remain low, and their overall prognosis is poor. Even with newer agents for NSCLC, options for treating BrMs can be limited by their ineffective transport across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the unique brain tumor microenvironment. The presence of actionable genomic alterations (AGAs) is a key determinant of optimal treatment selection, which aims to maximize responses and minimize toxicities. The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to understand the current landscape of the clinical management of patients with NSCLC and BrMs, particularly those with AGAs., Method: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-compliant SLR was conducted to identify studies in patients with BrMs in NSCLC. Searches used the EMBASE and MEDLINE ® databases, and articles published between January 1, 2017 and September 26, 2022 were reviewed., Results: Overall, 179 studies were included in the SLR. This subset review focused on 80 studies that included patients with NSCLC, BrMs, and AGAs (19 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], two single-arm studies, and 59 observational studies). Sixty-four of the 80 studies reported on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, 14 on anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations, and two on both alterations. Ninety-five percent of studies evaluated targeted therapy. All RCTs allowed patients with previously treated, asymptomatic, or neurologically stable BrMs; the percentage of asymptomatic BrMs varied across observational studies., Conclusions: Although targeted therapies demonstrate systemic benefits for patients with NSCLC, BrMs, and AGAs, there remains a continued need for effective therapies to treat and prevent BrMs in this population. Increased BBB permeability of emerging therapies may improve outcomes for this population., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction, A decade ago, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) without whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was emerging as preferred treatment for oligometastatic brain metastases. Studies of cavity SRS after neurosurgery were underway. Data specific to metastatic HER2 breast cancer (MHBC), describing intracranial, systemic and survival outcomes without WBRT, were lacking. A Phase II study was designed to address this gap. Method, Adults with MHBC, performance status 0-2, ≤ five BrM, receiving/planned to receive HER2-targeted therapy were eligible. Exclusions included leptomeningeal disease and prior WBRT. Neurosurgery allowed ≤6 weeks before registration and required for BrM >4 cm. Primary endpoint was 12-month requirement for WBRT. Secondary endpoints; freedom from (FF-) local failure (LF), distant brain failure (DBF), extracranial disease failure (ECDF), overall survival (OS), cause of death, mini-mental state examination (MMSE), adverse events (AE). Results, Twenty-five patients accrued Decembers 2016-2020. The study closed early after slow accrual. Thirty-seven BrM and four cavities received SRS. Four cavities and five BrM were observed. At 12 months: one patient required WBRT (FF-WBRT 95 %, 95 % CI 72-99), FFLF 91 % (95 % CI 69-98), FFDBF 57 % (95 % CI 34-74), FFECDF 64 % (95 % CI 45-84), OS 96 % (95 % CI 74-99). Two grade 3 AE occurred. MMSE was abnormal for 3/24 patients at baseline and 1/17 at 12 months. Conclusion, At 12 months, SRS and/or neurosurgery provided good control with low toxicity. WBRT was not required in 95 % of cases. This small study supports the practice change from WBRT to local therapies for MHBC BrM., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No conflicting relationship exists for any author., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

There is unmet need for additional biomarkers to better select patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that are likely to benefit from immunotherapy in order to improve patient outcomes, reduce patient toxicity, and relieve the growing burden of healthcare costs. In this issue of the JCI, Hayashi and colleagues evaluated soluble forms of the immune checkpoint molecules PD-L1, PD-1, and CTLA-4 in the plasma of patients with advanced NSCLC who had been treated with anti-PD-1/L1 therapy. The findings suggest that these soluble immune-checkpoint factors may provide a complementary biomarker to PD-L1 IHC, although application into the clinic may not be straightforward.

Tumor adaptation or selection is thought to underlie therapy resistance in glioma. To investigate longitudinal epigenetic evolution of gliomas in response to therapeutic pressure, we performed an epigenomic analysis of 132 matched initial and recurrent tumors from patients with IDH-wildtype (IDHwt) and IDH-mutant (IDHmut) glioma. IDHwt gliomas showed a stable epigenome over time with relatively low levels of global methylation. The epigenome of IDHmut gliomas showed initial high levels of genome-wide DNA methylation that was progressively reduced to levels similar to those of IDHwt tumors. Integration of epigenomics, gene expression, and functional genomics identified HOXD13 as a master regulator of IDHmut astrocytoma evolution. Furthermore, relapse of IDHmut tumors was accompanied by histologic progression that was associated with survival, as validated in an independent cohort. Finally, the initial cell composition of the tumor microenvironment varied between IDHwt and IDHmut tumors and changed differentially following treatment, suggesting increased neoangiogenesis and T-cell infiltration upon treatment of IDHmut gliomas. This study provides one of the largest cohorts of paired longitudinal glioma samples with epigenomic, transcriptomic, and genomic profiling and suggests that treatment of IDHmut glioma is associated with epigenomic evolution toward an IDHwt-like phenotype., Significance: Standard treatments are related to loss of DNA methylation in IDHmut glioma, resulting in epigenetic activation of genes associated with tumor progression and alterations in the microenvironment that resemble treatment-naïve IDHwt glioma., (©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) is commonly mutated (mIDH) in gliomas, and this mutant enzyme produces the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG). 2HG promotes gliomagenesis and is implicated in epileptogenesis. Ivosidenib (IVO), a small molecule oral mIDH1 inhibitor, is FDA-approved for mIDH1 newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Moreover, IVO has efficacy in clinical trials for recurrent mIDH1 gliomas. Given the lack of targeted treatments for gliomas, we initiated off-label IVO for mIDH glioma patients in October 2020., Methods: Retrospectively, we sought to assess early outcomes in our patients and describe their experience on IVO from October 2020 through February 2022. Our objective was to report on the following variables of off-label use of IVO: radiographic response, seizure control, tolerability, and access to the medication. All patients initially received single-agent IVO dosed at 500 mg orally once daily., Results: The cohort age range was 21-74 years. Tumor types included astrocytoma ( n = 14) and oligodendroglioma ( n = 16), with most being grade 2 ( n = 21). The best radiographic response in nonenhancing disease ( n = 22) was 12 stable diseases, 5 minor responses, 3 partial responses, and 2 progressive diseases. Seizure frequency was stable to improved for most patients (70%, n = 21). IVO was well-tolerated, with the most common toxicities being diarrhea, elevated creatine kinase, and QTc interval prolongation. Most patients (66.7%, n = 20) received drugs via the patient assistance program, with insurance initially covering a third of patients and with ongoing use, later covering 60%., Conclusions: Targeted therapies like IVO are options for mIDH glioma patients and can provide positive oncologic and neurological outcomes., Competing Interests: K.B.P.: Advisory Board—Servier, Cordance Medical, Vivicitas Oncology, Sapience, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ono Pharmaceuticals; Research Funding—Biomimetix; Varian; Servier. D.B.L.: Advisory Board—iADVISE, Roche. A.D.: Advisory Board—Orbus Therapeutics, Midatech LTD; Stock Options—Istari Oncology; Patents—Genetically modified poliovirus for the treatment of cancer. M.K.: Research Funding to Institution—BMS, AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, BioNTech, Celldex, Astellas, CNS Pharmaceuticals, Immorna Therapeutics, Immvira, Personalis; Honoraria—JAX lab for genomic research, Novocure, Servier, Johnson and Johnson, Voyager Therapeutics, George Clinical, and AnHeart Therapeutics; H.S.F.: Consulting or Advisory Role—Cancer Expert Now, Diverse Biotech, Istari Oncology; Stock Options—Cancer Expert Now, Diverse Biotech, Istari Oncology; Patents—Genetically modified poliovirus for the treatment of cancer., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Glioblastoma is a deadly brain tumor without any significantly successful treatments to date. Tumor antigen-targeted immunotherapy platforms including peptide and dendritic cell (DC) vaccines, have extended survival in hematologic malignancies. The relatively "cold" tumor immune microenvironment and heterogenous nature of glioblastoma have proven to be major limitations to translational application and efficacy of DC vaccines. Furthermore, many DC vaccine trials in glioblastoma are difficult to interpret due to a lack of contemporaneous controls, absence of any control comparison, or inconsistent patient populations. Here we review glioblastoma immunobiology aspects that are relevant to DC vaccines, review the clinical experience with DC vaccines targeting glioblastoma, discuss challenges in clinical trial design, and summarize conclusions and directions for future research for the development of effective DC vaccines for patients., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: There is an immunologic rationale to evaluate immunotherapy in the older glioblastoma population, who have been underrepresented in prior trials. The NUTMEG study evaluated the combination of nivolumab and temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma aged 65 years and older., Methods: NUTMEG was a multicenter 2:1 randomized phase II trial for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma aged 65 years and older. The experimental arm consisted of hypofractionated chemoradiation with temozolomide, then adjuvant nivolumab and temozolomide. The standard arm consisted of hypofractionated chemoradiation with temozolomide, then adjuvant temozolomide. The primary objective was to improve overall survival (OS) in the experimental arm., Results: A total of 103 participants were randomized, with 69 in the experimental arm and 34 in the standard arm. The median (range) age was 73 (65-88) years. After 37 months of follow-up, the median OS was 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.7-13.4) in the experimental arm and 11.8 months (95% CI, 8.3-14.8) in the standard arm. For the experimental arm relative to the standard arm, the OS hazard ratio was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.54-1.33). In the experimental arm, there were three grade 3 immune-related adverse events which resolved, with no unexpected serious adverse events., Conclusions: Due to insufficient evidence of benefit with nivolumab, the decision was made not to transition to a phase III trial. No new safety signals were identified with nivolumab. This complements the existing series of immunotherapy trials. Research is needed to identify biomarkers and new strategies including combinations., Competing Interests: HWS acknowledges institutional research funding from AbbVie and Bristol-Myers Squibb and has received honoraria from Eli Lilly. ABH serves on the advisory board of Caris Life Sciences and WIRB-Copernicus Group, and is supported by research grants from AbbVie, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and Cellularity. BME serves on the advisory board and as a consultant for Alpheus Medical, Curtana Pharmaceuticals, Ellipses Pharma, Global Coalition for Adaptive Research, ImmunoGenesis, Medicenna, MedQIA, Monteris, Neosoma, Sagimet Biosciences, Sapience Therapeutics, Servier Pharmaceuticals, Siemens and Sumitomo Pharma Oncology, serves as a consultant for Carthera and Chimerix, and is supported by a research grant from Siemens. HG serves on the advisory board of Merck Serono, and serves as a consultant for Curis and Telix Pharmaceuticals. HL acknowledges institutional research funding from Pfizer, and has received honoraria from AstraZeneca. JRS acknowledges institutional research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cancer Australia, Cancer Institute NSW, Merck Serono, National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Pfizer and Roche. ZL serves on the scientific advisory committee of Merck Sharp Dohme, has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Roche, and has received travel funding from Pfizer. MK acknowledges institutional research funding from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Specialized Therapeutics, and has received honoraria from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Ipsen, Pfizer and Roche., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.)

Background: Collaborative relationships between academic oncology and industry (pharmaceutical, biotechnology, "omic," and medical device companies) are essential for therapeutic development in oncology; however, limited research on engagement in and perceptions of these relationships has been done., Methods: Survey questions were developed to evaluate relationships between academic oncology and industry. An electronic survey was delivered to 1000 randomly selected members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, a professional organization for oncologists, eliciting respondents' views around oncology-industry collaborations. The responses were analyzed according to prespecified plans., Results: There were 225 survey respondents. Most were from the United States (70.0%), worked at an academic institution (60.1%), worked in medical oncology (81.2%), and had an active relationship with industry (85.8%). One quarter (26.7%) of respondents reported difficulty establishing a relationship with industry collaborators, and most respondents (75%) did not report having had mentorship in developing these relationships. The majority (85.3%) of respondents considered these collaborations important to their careers. Respondents generally thought that scientific integrity was preserved (92%), and most respondents (95%) had little concern over the quality of the collaborative product. Many (60%) shared concerns over potential conflict of interest if an individual with a compensated relationship promoted an industry product for clinical care/research, yet most respondents (67%) stated these relationships did not shape their interactions with patients., Conclusions: This study provides novel data characterizing the nature of collaborative relationships between clinicians, researchers, and industry in oncology. Although respondents considered these collaborations an important part of clinical and academic oncology, formal education or mentorship around these relationships was rare. Conflicting findings around conflict of interest highlight the importance of more dedicated research in this area., Plain Language Summary: Business enterprises in health care play a central role in cancer research and care, driving the development of new medical testing, drugs, and devices. Effective working relationships among clinicians, researchers, and these industry partners can promote innovative research and enhance patient care. Study of these collaborations has been limited to date. Through distribution of a questionnaire to cancer clinicians and researchers, we found that most participants consider these relationships valuable, though they find establishing such relationships challenging partly because of gaps in educational programs in this area. Our findings also highlight the need for further policy around the potential bias these relationships can introduce., (© 2023 American Cancer Society.)

The accepted paradigm for both cellular and anti-tumor immunity relies upon tumor cell killing by CD8 + T cells recognizing cognate antigens presented in the context of target cell major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I (MHC-I) molecules. Likewise, a classically described mechanism of tumor immune escape is tumor MHC-I downregulation. Here, we report that CD8 + T cells maintain the capacity to kill tumor cells that are entirely devoid of MHC-I expression. This capacity proves to be dependent instead on interactions between T cell natural killer group 2D (NKG2D) and tumor NKG2D ligands (NKG2DLs), the latter of which are highly expressed on MHC-loss variants. Necessarily, tumor cell killing in these instances is antigen independent, although prior T cell antigen-specific activation is required and can be furnished by myeloid cells or even neighboring MHC-replete tumor cells. In this manner, adaptive priming can beget innate killing. These mechanisms are active in vivo in mice as well as in vitro in human tumor systems and are obviated by NKG2D knockout or blockade. These studies challenge the long-advanced notion that downregulation of MHC-I is a viable means of tumor immune escape and instead identify the NKG2D-NKG2DL axis as a therapeutic target for enhancing T cell-dependent anti-tumor immunity against MHC-loss variants., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Glioblastoma is the most common aggressive primary central nervous system cancer in adults characterised by uniformly poor survival. Despite maximal safe resection and postoperative radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide-based chemotherapy, tumours inevitably recur. Imaging with O-(2-[ 18 F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography (PET) has the potential to impact adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) planning, distinguish between treatment-induced pseudoprogression versus tumour progression as well as prognostication., Methods and Analysis: The FET-PET in Glioblastoma (FIG) study is a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, phase II study across 10 Australian sites and will enrol up to 210 adults aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. FET-PET will be performed at up to three time points: (1) following initial surgery and prior to commencement of chemoradiation (FET-PET1); (2) 4 weeks following concurrent chemoradiation (FET-PET2); and (3) within 14 days of suspected clinical and/or radiological progression on MRI (performed at the time of clinical suspicion of tumour recurrence) (FET-PET3). The co-primary outcomes are: (1) to investigate how FET-PET versus standard MRI impacts RT volume delineation and (2) to determine the accuracy and management impact of FET-PET in distinguishing pseudoprogression from true tumour progression. The secondary outcomes are: (1) to investigate the relationships between FET-PET parameters (including dynamic uptake, tumour to background ratio, metabolic tumour volume) and progression-free survival and overall survival; (2) to assess the change in blood and tissue biomarkers determined by serum assay when comparing FET-PET data acquired prior to chemoradiation with other prognostic markers, looking at the relationships of FET-PET versus MRI-determined site/s of progressive disease post chemotherapy treatment with MRI and FET-PET imaging; and (3) to estimate the health economic impact of incorporating FET-PET into glioblastoma management and in the assessment of post-treatment pseudoprogression or recurrence/true progression. Exploratory outcomes include the correlation of multimodal imaging, blood and tumour biomarker analyses with patterns of failure and survival., Ethics and Dissemination: The study protocol V.2.0 dated 20 November 2020 has been approved by a lead Human Research Ethics Committee (Austin Health, Victoria). Other clinical sites will provide oversight through local governance processes, including obtaining informed consent from suitable participants. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. Results of the FIG study (TROG 18.06) will be disseminated via relevant scientific and consumer forums and peer-reviewed publications., Trial Registration Number: ANZCTR ACTRN12619001735145., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Brain metastases are an increasing global public health concern, even as survival rates improve for patients with metastatic disease. Both metastases and the sequelae of their treatment are key determinants of the inter-related priorities of patient survival, function, and quality of life, mandating a multidimensional approach to clinical care and research. At a virtual National Cancer Institute Workshop in September, 2022, key stakeholders convened to define research priorities to address the crucial areas of unmet need for patients with brain metastases to achieve meaningful advances in patient outcomes. This Policy Review outlines existing knowledge gaps, collaborative opportunities, and specific recommendations regarding consensus priorities and future directions in brain metastases research. Achieving major advances in research will require enhanced coordination between the ongoing efforts of individual organisations and consortia. Importantly, the continual and active engagement of patients and patient advocates will be necessary to ensure that the directionality of all efforts reflects what is most meaningful in the context of patient care., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests TSA, DKS, PSS, JAH, MGE, JSB-S, PGP, CNC, and MMA are employees of the US National Institutes of Health. BME received consulting fees from Medicenna, MedQIA, Servier, Chimerix, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, ImmunoGenesis, Ellipses Pharma, Alpheus Medical, Curtana Pharma, Sagimet Biosciences, and Sapience Therapeutics; and other support from Siemens. SCF received grants from Siemens and Neosoma; consulting fees from Medicenna, MedQIA, Servier, Chimerix, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, ImmunoGenesis, Ellipses Pharma, Alpheus Medical, Curtana Pharma, Sagimet Biosciences, and Sapience Therapeutics; and other services from Siemens. AAA received grants from Varian and NH TheraAguix, and consulting fees from Novartis and Seagen. DMT received grants from Varian Medical Systems, Blue Earth Diagnostics, and NovoCure, and consulting fees from Boston Scientific. RK received grants from Medtronic, Blue Earth Diagnostics, NovoCure, GT Medical Technologies, AstraZeneca, Exelixis, Viewray, Brainlab, and Cantex Pharmaceuticals; consulting fees from Kazia Therapeutics, Elekta, Viewray, Castle Biosciences, and NovoCure; travel support from Elekta, Accuray, NovoCure, and Peerview Institute for Medical Education; other support from Elekta, Accuray, Novocure, and the Peerview Institute for Medical Education; and is on the Viewray Medical Advisory Board. CKA received grants from PUMA, Lilly, Merck, Seattle Genetics, Nektar, Tesaro, G1-Therapeutics, ZION, Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Elucida, and Caris; licences from UpToDate and Jones and Bartlett; other support from Genentech, Eisai, IPSEN, Seattle Genetics, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Immunomedics, Elucida, and Athenex; and is on the Genentech board. PWS received consulting fees from Varian. JH-G has funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) and received payment for a lecture from Aptitude Health. DNY has a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Medical Grant and Brockman Foundation Medical Grant. ICGO received grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, and Pfizer; and consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Array, Novartis, Sintetica, and Leal Therapeutics. AM received grants from Eisai/H3B Pharmaceutical, Takeda Millenium Pharm, Lilly, Pfizer, MTEM, Merck, Roche, Zion, Norvatis, Dantari, and Genentech; payment from Taiho; research support from Tempus and PUMA; and was on the boards for Seagen and Eli Lilly. EG received grants from Celgene, Denovo Biopharma, MedImmune, and Servier Pharmaceuticals; and is on the boards for Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kiyatec, and Boston Scientific. VG received grants from ImmunoChem Therapeutics. PKB received grants from Mirati, Eli Lilly, Kinnate, Merck, NIH, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Damon Runyon, AACR, the Terry and Jean de Gunzburg MGH Research Scholar Fund, and the Demetra fund; consulting fees from Axiom Healthcare, Pfizer, Dantari, Advice Connect inspire, ElevateBio, Sintetica, SK Life Sciences, Voyager Therapeutics, Kazia, MPM Capital, Medscape, Eli Lilly, and Tesaro; other payments from Medscape and Pfizer; other support from GSK, Genentech-Roche, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Kazia, Merck, Mirati, and Pfizer; and was the Chair of Society of Annual Neuro-Oncology Meetings. LC has grants from CDC/Johns Hopkins, DSI, Hological, and Myriad; US patent US7734496B1; stock from UNH; and a leadership role at Touch4Life and MD HBEB. MPM received consulting fees from Kazia, Novocure, Zap, Xoft, Karyopharm, and Sapience; has stocks at Oncoceutics and Chimerix; and is on the boards for Mevion, Oncoceutics, and Xcision. MK received grants from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, BioNTech, CNS pharmaceuticals, Immorna Therapeutics, Celldex Therapeutics, and Astellas; consulting fees from Novocure and George Clinical; miscellaneous payment from Jax Lab, GSK, Voyager Therapeutics, and Johnson and Johnson; and is on the board for Berg Pharmaceuticals. MSA received grants from Seagen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, Incyte, Pharmacyclics, Novocure, Mimivax, and Merck; consulting fees from Bayer, Novocure, Kiyatec, Insightec, GSK, Xoft, Nuvation, Cellulartity, SDP Oncology, Apollomics, Prelude, Janssen, Tocagen, Voyager Therapeutics, Viewray, Caris Lifesciences, Pyramid Biosciences, Anheart Therapeutics, Varian Medical Systems, Theraguix, and Menarini Ricerche; has stocks from Mimivax, Cytodyn, and Medlnnovate Advisors; and is on the boards for Cairn Therapeutics, Pyramid Biosciences, Modifi Biosciences, and Bugworks. MHG has grant number U54CA261717 from the NIH/NCI and received consulting fees from Midatech. JL has research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb. MMK has a grant (number R50CA276015) from the NIH/NCI and Blue Earth Diagnostics; and is on the boards for the NCCN CNS Cancers Guidelines Committee, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Neuro-Oncology, and the External Advisory Board for Stanford U54 MetNet. JR received grants from Black Diamond Therapeutics, Blueprint Medicines, Hummingbird, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology/Cancer Core Europe, Yingli, AadiBioscience, Amgen, Bayer, Bicycle Therapeutics, BioAtla, BioMed Valley Discoveries, Cellestia, Curis, CytomX, Deciphera, ForeBio, GenMab, GlaxoSmithKline, Hummingbird, Hucthinson MediPharma, Ideaya, Kelun-Biotech, Linnaeus Therapeutics, Loxo Oncology, Merus, Mirati, Novartis, Nuvation, Pfizer, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Symphogen, Taiho, Takeda-Millennium, and Tango Therapeutics; consulting fees from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Avoro Capital Advisors, Boxer Capital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Clarion Healthcare, Columbus Venture Partners, Cullgen, Debiopharm, Incyte, Macrogenics, Merus, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Oncology One, Pfizer, Sardona Therapeutics, Tang Advisors, and the Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology/Ministero De Empleo Y Seguridad Social; travel support from European Society for Medical Oncology; is on boards for AadiBioscience, Ellipses Pharma, Envision Pharma Limited, Incyte, IONCTURA, Merus, and Monte Rosa Therapeutics; and is on the steering committee for the Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology/Ministero De Empleo Y Seguridad Social. AB received support from NIH grant number P30 CA008748, has four US patents, and is on the Evren Technologies Scientific Advisory Board. HT has grants from BMS Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Merck, Genentech, Eisai, GSK, RAPT, and Dragonfly; and received consulting fees from BMS Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Merck, Genentech, Eisai, Iovance, Pfizer, Karyopharm, Boxer Capital, Jazz Pharma, and Medicenna. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Glioblastoma is highly aggressive and remains difficult to treat despite being the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Current standard-of-care treatment calls for maximum resection of the tumor mass followed by concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy and further adjuvant chemotherapy if necessary. Despite this regimen, prognosis remains grim. Immunotherapy has shown promising success in a variety of solid tumor types, but efficacy in glioblastoma is yet to be demonstrated. Barriers to the success of immunotherapy in glioblastoma include: a heterogeneous tumor cell population, a highly immunosuppressive microenvironment, and the blood-brain barrier, to name a few. Several immunotherapeutic approaches are actively being investigated and developed to overcome these limitations. In this review, we present different classes of immunotherapy targeting glioblastoma, their most recent results, and potential future directions., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Purpose of Review: The management of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastomas is an area of unmet need. Despite multimodal therapy incorporating maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, and temozolomide, clinical outcomes remain poor. At disease progression or relapse, available systemic agents such as temozolomide, lomustine, and bevacizumab have limited efficacy. We review the recent advances in the treatment of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas., Recent Findings: A broad repertoire of systemic agents is in the early stages of development, encompassing the areas of precision medicine, immunotherapy, and repurposed medications. The use of medical devices may present opportunities to bypass the blood-brain barrier. Novel clinical trial designs aim to efficiently test treatment options to advance the field. There are a number of emerging treatment options for IDH-wildtype glioblastomas which are undergoing evaluation in clinical trials. Advances in our scientific understanding of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas offer hope and the prospect of incremental improvements in clinical outcomes., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Gliomas are the most common primary brain malignancy and are universally fatal. Despite significant breakthrough in understanding tumor biology, treatment breakthroughs have been limited. There is a growing appreciation that major limitations on effective treatment are related to the unique and highly complex glioma tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME consists of multiple different cell types, broadly categorized into tumoral, immune and non-tumoral, non-immune cells. Each group provides significant influence on the others, generating a pro-tumor dynamic with significant immunosuppression. In addition, glioma cells are highly heterogenous with various molecular distinctions on the cellular level. These variations, in turn, lead to their own unique influence on the TME. To develop future treatments, an understanding of this complex TME interplay is needed. To this end, we describe the TME in adult gliomas through interactions between its various components and through various glioma molecular phenotypes.

Objectives: To explore informal caregivers' perspectives on precision medicine in cancer care., Design: Semi-structured interviews with the informal caregivers of people living with cancer and receiving targeted/immunotherapies. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically using a framework approach., Setting: Recruitment was facilitated by two hospitals and five Australian cancer community groups., Participants: Informal caregivers (n=28; 16 men, 12 women; aged 18-80) of people living with cancer and receiving targeted/immunotherapies., Results: Thematic analysis identified three findings, centred largely on the pervasive theme of hope in relation to precision therapies including: (1) precision as a key component of caregivers' hope; (2) hope as a collective practice between patients, caregivers, clinicians and others, which entailed work and obligation for caregivers; and (3) hope as linked to expectations of further scientific progress, even if there may be no personal, immediate benefit., Conclusions: Innovation and change in precision oncology are rapidly reconfiguring the parameters of hope for patients and caregivers, creating new and difficult relational moments and experiences in everyday life and in clinical encounters. In the context of a shifting therapeutic landscape, caregivers' experiences illustrate the need to understand hope as collectively produced, as emotional and moral labour, and as entangled in broader cultural expectations of medical advances. Such understandings may help clinicians as they guide patients and caregivers through the complexities of diagnosis, treatment, emerging evidence and possible futures in the precision era. Developing a better understanding of informal caregivers' experiences of caring for patients receiving precision therapies is important for improving support to patients and their caregivers., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

For three years, COVID-19 has circulated among our communities and around the world, fundamentally changing social interactions, health care systems, and service delivery. For people living with (and receiving treatment for) cancer, pandemic conditions presented significant additional hurdles in an already unstable and shifting environment, including disrupted personal contact with care providers, interrupted access to clinical trials, distanced therapeutic encounters, multiple immune vulnerabilities, and new forms of financial precarity. In a 2020 perspective in this journal, we examined how COVID-19 was reshaping cancer care in the early stages of the pandemic and how these changes might endure into the future. Three years later, and in light of a series of interviews with patients and their caregivers from the United States and Australia conducted during the pandemic, we return to consider the potential legacy effects of the pandemic on cancer care. While some challenges to care provision and survivorship were unforeseen, others accentuated and amplified existing problems experienced by patients, caregivers, and health care providers. Both are likely to have enduring effects in the "post-pandemic" world, raising the importance of focusing on lessons that can be learned for the future., (©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Successful drug development for people with cancers of the CNS has been challenging. There are multiple barriers to successful drug development including biological factors, rarity of the disease, and ineffective use of clinical trials. Based upon a series of presentations at the First Central Nervous System Clinical Trials Conference hosted by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the Society for Neuro-Oncology, we provide an overview on drug development and novel trial designs in neuro-oncology. This Review discusses the challenges of therapeutic development in neuro-oncology and proposes strategies to improve the drug discovery process by enriching the pipeline of promising therapies, optimising trial design, incorporating biomarkers, using external data, and maximising efficacy and reproducibility of clinical trials., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests RR has received research support from Project Data Sphere and personal fees from St Lucia Consulting, outside the submitted work;and has been supported by the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy Foundation Grant. CKA has received research support from Puma Biotechnology, Lilly, Merck, Seattle Genetics, Nektar, Tesaro, G1-Therapeutics, Zion Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Elucida; served as consultant for Genentech, Eisai, IPSEN, Seattle Genetics, AstraZeneca, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Immunomedics, Elucida, and Athenex; and received royalties from UpToDate, Jones & Bartlett. HAT received personal fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals; grants and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, and Genentech; and grants from Merck and Celegene, outside the submitted work. MM reports personal fees from KaryoPharm, Mevio, Zapprx, Sapience, and Xoft outside the submitted work. He reports participation in the board of directors for Oncoceutics and stock ownership in Chimerix. PYW has received research support from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Celgene, Chimerix, Eli Lily, Genentech, Roche, Kazia, MediciNova, Merck, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Nuvation Bio, Puma, Servier, Vascular Biogenics, and Variation Biotechnologies Vaccines; and is on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Black Diamond, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Celularity, Chimerix, Day One Bio, Genenta, GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm, Merck, Mundipharma, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novocure, Nuvation Bio, Prelude Therapeutics, Sapience, Servier, Sagimet, Vascular Biogenics, and VBI Vaccines. JdG reports grant or research support from Sanofi-Aventis, AstraZeneca, EMD-Serono, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, and Mundipharma; paid consultancies from Celldex, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, FivePrime Therapeutics, GW Pharmaceuticals, Carthera, Eli Lilly, Kadmon, Boston Biomedical, Taiho Pharmaceuticals, Kairos Venture Investments, Syneos Health, Monteris, Agios, Mundipharma Research, GenomiCare, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Del Mar Pharmaceuticals, Insightec, Voyager Therapeutics, Merck, Tocagen, Bioasis Technologies, and ResTORbio; advisory board membership for Genentech, Celldex, Foundation Medicine, Novogen, Deciphera, AstraZeneca, Insys Therapeutics, Merck, Eli Lilly, Novella Clinical, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Kiyatec, Vanquish Oncology, Orsenix, Insightec, Prelude Therapeutics, Debiopharm Therapeutics, and Janssen Global Services; data safety monitoring board membership for VBL Therapeutics (VB111; glioblastoma), Novella (ICT-107; glioblastoma), and VBI Vaccines (VBI-1901; glioblastoma); stock ownership in Ziopharm Oncology and Gilead; and company employment (spouse) in Ziopharm Oncology. EG has received honoraria for advisory board participation from Kiyatec (personal compensation), and Karyopharm Therapetuics for data safety and monitoring board participation (compensation to employer). Her institution has received grant funding from Servier Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, MedImmune, and Tracon Pharmaceuticals; and she has been supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award numbers UG1CA189823 (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology), R01 CA258239, U19 CA264362, and The Ben and Catherine Ivy Foundation. MK reports research funding paid to their institution from BMS, AbbVie, Biontech, Astellas, Celldex, Daiichi Sankyo, and CNS pharmaceuticals; and honoraria from George Clinical, Voyager Therapeutics, Johnson & Johnson, and the Jax lab for genomic research; and is supported by NIH grants (U01-NS090284-05, U19-CA264385-01, P50CA190991-08, P01-CA225622-04, and R01-CA235612-03). M-YCP has been supported by the National Cancer Institute of the NIH under award number U10 CA180822 (NRG Oncology—Statistics and Data Management Center). All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are a devastating complication of HER2 + metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with no effective treatments. In a case series of 8 patients with heavily pretreated HER2 + MBC and progressing LM, all 8 patients (100%) derived clinical benefit from Trastuzumab deruxtecan (TDXd), and 4 patients (50%) had an objective partial response based on formal neuroradiology MRI reads using the EORTC/RANO-LM Revised-Scorecard. T-DXd warrants further study in LM in HER2 + MBC and solid tumors where T-DXd may be active., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to radiotherapy (RT) improves overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), but previous studies suggest that patients with tumors harboring an unmethylated MGMT promoter derive minimal benefit. The aim of this open-label, phase III CheckMate 498 study was to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab (NIVO) + RT compared with TMZ + RT in newly diagnosed GBM with unmethylated MGMT promoter., Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to standard RT (60 Gy) + NIVO (240 mg every 2 weeks for eight cycles, then 480 mg every 4 weeks) or RT + TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily during RT and 150-200 mg/m2/day 5/28 days during maintenance). The primary endpoint was OS., Results: A total of 560 patients were randomized, 280 to each arm. Median OS (mOS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.6 to 14.3) with NIVO + RT and 14.9 months (95% CI, 13.3 to 16.1) with TMZ + RT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.58; P = .0037). Median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 6.2) with NIVO + RT and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.9 to 6.7) with TMZ + RT (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.65). Response rates were 7.8% (9/116) with NIVO + RT and 7.2% (8/111) with TMZ + RT; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) rates were 21.9% and 25.1%, and any-grade serious TRAE rates were 17.3% and 7.6%, respectively., Conclusions: The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved OS; TMZ + RT demonstrated a longer mOS than NIVO + RT. No new safety signals were detected with NIVO in this study. The difference between the study treatment arms is consistent with the use of TMZ + RT as the standard of care for GBM.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02617589., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.)

Background: Serclutamab talirine (Ser-T, formerly ABBV-321) is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an antibody (AM-1-ABT-806) directed against activated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer. We investigated Ser-T monotherapy in a phase I, first-in-human, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study in patients with advanced solid tumors associated with EGFR overexpression., Methods: Eligible patients (≥18 years) had advanced, histologically confirmed solid tumors associated with EGFR overexpression (centralized testing). Patients received Ser-T intravenously once every 4 weeks (Q4W; 5-50 μg/kg) in the dose-escalation phase. Herein, preliminary antitumor activity at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) is reported only for patients with glioblastoma ( n = 24); additional assessments included all treated patients., Results: Sixty-two patients (median age: 58 years) were enrolled within the dose-escalation ( n = 43) and dose-expansion ( n = 19) phases. One dose-limiting toxicity, grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase elevation, occurred at 20 μg/kg during dose escalation. The Ser-T RP2D regimen of 50 μg/kg × 1 (loading dose) followed by 25 μg/kg Q4W (maintenance dose) was administered during dose expansion. Fatigue (37%) was the only treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) occurring in >25% of patients. Two patients (3%) reported mild treatment-related ocular AEs (eye pruritus). Responses in patients with glioblastoma included 1 partial response (~33 months), 6 stable disease, and 14 progressive disease (not evaluable: n = 3)., Conclusions: Ser-T monotherapy at doses up to 50 μg/kg initial dose, followed by 25 μg/kg Q4W demonstrated a tolerable safety profile with minimal antitumor activity observed in patients with glioblastoma. The glioblastoma dose-expansion cohort was closed due to a lack of efficacy (NCT03234712)., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.)

Aim: Palbociclib was approved in the United States in 2015 to treat estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). This study evaluated outcomes and safety in patients treated with palbociclib in Australia and India with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- ABC before palbociclib became commercially available., Methods: Postmenopausal women (≥18 years) with HR+/HER2- ABC who were appropriate candidates for letrozole therapy received palbociclib 125 mg once daily for 21 days followed by 7 days off, and letrozole 2.5 mg once daily (continuous). Safety, tumor response, and patient-reported outcomes (Australian cohort) were evaluated., Results: In total, 252 patients received palbociclib plus letrozole (Australia, n = 152; India, n = 100). More patients in the Australian versus Indian cohort had received prior chemotherapy (advanced/metastatic setting: 45.9% vs. 32.0%), endocrine therapy (advanced/metastatic setting: 63.2% vs. 54.3%), and advanced/metastatic therapies (61.8% vs. 31.0%). The most frequently reported all-grade palbociclib-related treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (66.7%), fatigue (35.3%), and stomatitis (26.6%); grade 3/4 neutropenia was reported as palbociclib-related in 62.7% of patients. Febrile neutropenia was reported in six patients (2.4%). Eight patients (3.2%) discontinued because of an adverse event. The objective response rate was 19.4% (95% CI, 14.7%-24.9%) overall and 2.3% in Australian patients with ≥2 lines of prior therapy for metastatic disease. Patient-reported quality of life scores were maintained throughout the study., Conclusions: In an expanded access setting in Australia and India, palbociclib plus letrozole was well tolerated in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC, with a safety profile consistent with previous reports., (© 2021 The Authors. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are relatively rare neoplasms occurring predominantly in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. Their heterogeneity poses challenges for diagnosis and treatment. There is a paucity of markers for characterisation of NEN tumours. For routine diagnosis, immunohistochemistry of the NEN-specific markers CgA and synaptophysin and the proliferation marker Ki-67 are used. These parameters, however, are qualitative and lack the capacity to fully define the tumour phenotype. Molecules of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) are potential candidates for improved tumour characterisation. Using qRT-PCR, we measured mRNA levels of 27 tumour markers, including 25 EMT-associated markers, in tumour tissue and matched non-tumour tissues for 13 patients with pancreatic NENs. Tissue from patients with three different grades of tumour had distinctly different mRNA profiles. Of the 25 EMT-associated markers analysed, 17 were higher in G3 tissue relative to matched non-tumour tissue, including CD14, CD24, CD31, CD44, CD45, CD56, CK6, CK7, CK13, CK20, NSE, CDX2, CgA, DAXX, PCNA, laminin and Ki-67. The differences in levels of seven EMT-associated markers, Ki-67, DAXX, CD24, CD44, vimentin, laminin and PDX1 plus CgA and NSE (neuroendocrine markers) enabled a distinct molecular signature for each tumour grade to be generated. EMT molecules differentially expressed in three tumour grades have potential for use in tumour stratification and prognostication and as therapeutic targets for treatment of neuroendocrine cancers, following validation with additional samples.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is notorious for its immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and is refractory to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Here, we identify calmodulin-dependent kinase kinase 2 (CaMKK2) as a driver of ICB resistance. CaMKK2 is highly expressed in pro-tumor cells and is associated with worsened survival in patients with GBM. Host CaMKK2, specifically, reduces survival and promotes ICB resistance. Multimodal profiling of the TME reveals that CaMKK2 is associated with several ICB resistance-associated immune phenotypes. CaMKK2 promotes exhaustion in CD8 + T cells and reduces the expansion of effector CD4 + T cells, additionally limiting their tumor penetrance. CaMKK2 also maintains myeloid cells in a disease-associated microglia-like phenotype. Lastly, neuronal CaMKK2 is required for maintaining the ICB resistance-associated myeloid phenotype, is deleterious to survival, and promotes ICB resistance. Our findings reveal CaMKK2 as a contributor to ICB resistance and identify neurons as a driver of immunotherapeutic resistance in GBM., (© 2022. The Author(s).)