Search

As part of the National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiologic Catchment Area study, 7954 respondents were questioned at baseline and 1 year later about sleep complaints and psychiatric symptoms using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Of this community sample, 10.2% and 3.2% noted insomnia and hypersomnia, respectively, at the first interview. Forty percent of those with insomnia and 46.5% of those with hypersomnia had a psychiatric disorder compared with 16.4% of those with no sleep complaints. The risk of developing new major depression was much higher in those who had insomnia at both interviews compared with those without insomnia (odds ratio, 39.8; 95% confidence interval, 19.8 to 80.0). The risk of developing new major depression was much less for those who had insomnia that had resolved by the second visit (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.5 to 5.3). Further research is needed to determine if early recognition and treatment of sleep disturbances can prevent future psychiatric disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is an analysis of data from the NIMH-sponsored Epidemiologic Catchment Area community-based study, investigating who reported discussing mental health or substance abuse problems with nonpsychiatric physicians. Data were from 7,092 respondents in four sites, all of whom had received care only in the nonpsychiatric sector in the previous six months. A multiple logistic model found that those individuals who had psychiatric disorders, and female, middle-aged, and Hispanic respondents, were more likely to have discussed emotional or mental health problems with their physicians. Respondents with alcohol abuse and substance abuse disorders did not report any more discussion of mental health problems than did respondents without alcohol or substance abuse disorders. Only 36% of the respondents who said they had discussed mental health problems were found to have psychiatric disorders by the Diagnostic Interview Survey (DIS), but many of those without disorders reported more anxiety symptoms. An analysis was done to predict which respondents with DIS-defined psychiatric disorders did not report discussing mental health problems with their nonpsychiatric physicians. Those less than 35 years of age, those older than 65 years of age, males, and those with only one recent visit to a provider were statistically at high risk for not discussing their psychiatric problems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Discusses the 'Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: An Assessment of the Effectiveness of 169 Interventions,' by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Importance of personal health practices; Shifting priorities in primary care; Designing medical practice to individual risks; Timing of preventive services; Changing role of patient.

Competing Interests: Competing interests: See www.bmj.com/about-bmj/editorial-staff/douglas-kamerow

Competing Interests: Competing interests: See www.bmj.com/about-bmj/editorial-staff/douglas-kamerow.

Competing Interests: Competing interests: See www.bmj.com/about-bmj/editorial-staff/douglas-kamerow.

Competing Interests: Competing interests: See www.bmj.com/about-bmj/editorial-staff/douglas-kamerow.

Competing Interests: Competing interests: See www.bmj.com/about-bmj/editorial-staff/douglas-kamerow.

Primary care panel sizes are an important component of primary care practices. Determining the appropriate panel size has implications for patient access, physician workload, and care comprehensiveness and will have an impact on quality of care. An often quoted standard panel size is 2500. However, this number seems to arise in the literature anecdotally, without a basis in research. Subsequently, multiple studies observed that a panel size of 2500 is not feasible because of time constraints and results in incomplete preventive care and health care screening services. In this article we review the origins of a panel size of 2500, review the subsequent work examining this number and effectively debunking it as a feasible panel size, and discuss the importance of primary care physicians setting an appropriate panel size., (© Copyright 2016 by the American Board of Family Medicine.)