Search

Purpose: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has limited treatment options. We compared the efficacy of comprehensive precision medicine against that of the conventional treatment in PDAC., Patients and Methods: We report a phase III trial of advanced PDAC in which patients were randomized (1:2) to a conventional treatment treated at physician's discretion (arm A) or to precision medicine (arm B). Subjects randomized to arm B underwent a tumor biopsy for whole-exome sequencing and to generate avatar mouse models and patient-derived organoids for phenotypic drug screening, with final treatment recommended by the molecular tumor board. The primary objective was median overall survival (OS)., Results: A total of 137 patients were enrolled with 125 randomized, 44 to arm A and 81 to arm B. Whole-exome sequencing was performed in 80.3% (65/81) patients of arm B, with potentially actionable mutations detected in 21.5% (14/65). Experimental models were generated in 16/81 patients (19.8%). Second-line treatment was administered to 39 patients in the experimental arm, but only four (10.2%) received personalized treatment, whereas 35 could not receive matched therapy because of rapid clinical deterioration, delays in obtaining study results, or the absence of actionable targets. The median OS was 8.7 and 8.6 months (P = 0.849) and the median progression-free survival was 3.8 and 4.3 months (P = 0.563) for the conventional and experimental arms, respectively. Notably, the four patients who received personalized treatment had a median OS of 19.3 months., Conclusions: Personalized medicine was challenging to implement in most patients with PDAC, limiting the interpretation of intention-to-treat analysis. Survival was improved in the subset of patients who did receive matched therapy., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Liquid biopsies and the dynamic tracking of somatic mutations within circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can provide insight into the dynamics of cancer evolution and the intra-tumour heterogeneity that fuels treatment resistance. However, identifying and tracking dynamic changes in somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs), which have been associated with poor outcome and metastasis, using ctDNA is challenging. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a disease which has been considered to harbour early punctuated events in its evolution, leading to an early fitness peak, with minimal further subclonal evolution., Methods: To interrogate the role of SCNAs in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cancer evolution, we applied whole-exome sequencing of 55 longitudinal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples taken from 24 patients (including 8 from whom a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) was derived) with metastatic disease prospectively recruited into a clinical trial. We developed a method, Aneuploidy in Circulating Tumour DNA (ACT-Discover), that leverages haplotype phasing of paired tumour biopsies or PDXs to identify SCNAs in cfDNA with greater sensitivity., Results: SCNAs were observed within 28 of 47 evaluable cfDNA samples. Of these events, 30% could only be identified by harnessing the haplotype-aware approach leveraged in ACT-Discover. The exceptional purity of PDX tumours enabled near-complete phasing of genomic regions in allelic imbalance, highlighting an important auxiliary function of PDXs. Finally, although the classical model of pancreatic cancer evolution emphasises the importance of early, homogenous somatic events as a key requirement for cancer development, ACT-Discover identified substantial heterogeneity of SCNAs, including parallel focal and arm-level events, affecting different parental alleles within individual tumours. Indeed, ongoing acquisition of SCNAs was identified within tumours throughout the disease course, including within an untreated metastatic tumour., Conclusions: This work demonstrates the power of haplotype phasing to study genomic variation in cfDNA samples and reveals undiscovered intra-tumour heterogeneity with important scientific and clinical implications. Implementation of ACT-Discover could lead to important insights from existing cohorts or underpin future prospective studies seeking to characterise the landscape of tumour evolution through liquid biopsy., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To determine the efficacy and safety data of aflibercept + FOLFIRI in wt RAS mCRC patients after progression to standard chemotherapy + anti-EGFR treatment., Methods: Retrospective, observational study in real life conducted in wt RAS mCRC patients treated with FOLFIRI-aflibercept after progression to standard first line chemotherapy + anti-EGFR treatment., Results: A total of 120 patients from 12 Spanish hospitals were enrolled. Median age is 60 years (62.5%/37.5%male/female). Primary tumor site is 24.1%/75.9% right/left-side colon, and 40.8% of patients had a prior resection. All patients had wild-type RAS tumors including 5% of patients with BRAF mutations and received anti-EGFR treatment. At the time aflibercept was initiated, ECOG PS is 0/1 in 96% of patients. Median number of FOLFIRI-aflibercept cycles is 12. Efficacy results: Overall response rate is 33%; progression-free survival (PFS) is 6.9 months (95%CI: 6.1-7.8). Primary tumor resection was the only significant variable related to PFS in the multivariate analysis. Median overall survival (OS) is 14.5 months (95%CI: 9.7-19.3). ECOG and number of metastatic sites were related to OS in multivariate analysis. About 54.1% of patients received a third-line therapy including TAS-102 (23%), regorafenib (18.5%), and capecitabine (9.2%)., Toxicity: Grade 3-4 toxicities were observed in 37.5% of the patients (hematologic 16.6%, hypertension 7.5%, asthenia 5.9%, and perforation 2.5%). Aflibercept dose was reduced in 18.3% of patients., Conclusions: The results show that patients with wt RAS mCRC who received an anti-EGFR as part of the first-line treatment achieved similar RR, PFS, OS, and toxicities to those reported in VELOUR trial. These results suggest that FOLFIRI-aflibercept after first-line treatment with anti-EGFR is an appropriated option for RAS wt mCRC.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer death in Spain. Fifty percent of patients will develop colorectal liver metastases (CLM) during the course of the disease. Less than 20% of patients with CLM are initially resectable and for them 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) is about 20-25%, with a high recurrence rate. CLM is a heterogeneous disease. From a clinical point of view, four main groups can be differentiated: initially resectable, not optimally resectable, unresectable that could be resectable and unresectable that never will be likely to be resected. Treatment of CLM must be established, always, in a multidisciplinary team discussion with an analysis of prognostic factors and resectability. For patients with resectable CLM, the EORTC trial 364 demonstrated that chemotherapy plus surgery is better than surgery alone. Consequently most patients should be treated with perioperative chemotherapy based on oxaliplatin, and if resection has been done without chemotherapy, they should receive adjuvant chemotherapy after R0 resection. Based on oncological factors, the 5-year survival rate after resection of CLM ranges from 60% to only 14% with a poor score. If a patient has more than one of the poor prognostic factors he should probably be referred for preoperative (induction) chemotherapy. Only a minority of patients with CLM are amenable to surgery; therefore, efforts have been made to increase the percentage of patients who could be candidates for resection. Studies, mostly retrospective, have confirmed the ability of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (conversion chemotherapy) to render some metastases resectable. The regimens we must use depend on the KRAS mutational status and the toxicity profiles of drugs in the context of each patient. In k-ras mutated tumours we can use bevacizumab combined with standard chemotherapy or concomitant administration of the three active agents (FOLFOXIRI) in suitable patients. In k-ras wild-type patients, the combination of cetuximab and FOLFIRI-FOLFOX improved response rates and resection rate in phase III-II trials. With a lower level of evidence, panitumumab is an alternative combined with FOLFOX. Bevacizumab is also an alternative as it does not depend on KRAS status. Radiotherapy is becoming an alternative in selected patients, where surgery is not an alternative. For the majority of patients, who will never be resectable, the continuum of care with chemotherapy will be the paradigm for their management.

Objective: The objectives of this phase I/II study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), characterise the principal toxicities in the phase I part and assess the efficacy in the phase II part of gefitinib, an oral selective inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor, in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC)., Methods and Patients: Patients with advanced CRC were treated with gefitinib administered daily for 21 days and capecitabine administered twice daily for 14 days of a 21-day cycle. The dose levels of gefitinib (mg) and capecitabine (mg/m(2) bid) assessed were 250/1000 and 250/ 1250. An expanded cohort was enrolled at the MTD to better characterise toxicity and efficacy. A total of 32 previously treated patients were accrued. In the phase I part 10 subjects were treated, with one dose-limiting toxicity. Overall 26 patients were treated at the MTD of the combination, which was gefitinib 250 mg/day and capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily., Results: The most frequent treatment-related adverse events included asthenia, diarrhoea, nausea, rash and anorexia. The incidence profile was very similar in phases I and II. No objective responses were documented but 53% of the patients achieved stable disease as best response to therapy., Conclusions: Capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily 14 of 21 days and gefitinib at 250 mg/day can be safely administered in combination. The combination is relatively well tolerated. There were no objective responses, although an interesting stabilisation rate was documented, in previously treated advanced CRC patients.