Search

Background: Primary arthrodesis of Lisfranc fracture-dislocations is a reliable treatment option, yet concerns remain about nonunion. Nitinol staple use has recently proliferated in midfoot arthrodesis. The purpose of this study is to examine the union rate of primary arthrodesis of acute Lisfranc fracture-dislocations treated with nitinol staples compared with traditional plate-and-screw fixation. The secondary objective is to assess the difference in operative times and reoperation rates., Methods: Midfoot fracture-dislocations treated with primary arthrodesis by 7 foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons were reviewed. Of 160 eligible patients, 121 patients (305 joints) met the required 4-month minimum radiographic follow-up. Radiographic outcomes were analyzed at the individual joint level. Each joint was classified as either staples alone (45 patients, 154 joints), staples plus plates and screws (hybrid) (45 patients, 40 joints), or plates and screws alone (31 patients, 111 joints). The primary outcome was arthrodesis union at each joint fused., Results: Nonunion was more common (9.0%, 10/111) among joints fixed with plate and screws than with hybrid (2.5%, 1/40) or staples only (1.3%, 2/154) ( P  = .0085). Multivariable regression demonstrated that autograft use was independent associated with union ( P  = .0035) and plate-and-screw only fixation was an independent risk factor for nonunion ( P  = .0407). Median operating room and tourniquet times were shorter for hybrid (92 and 83 minutes) and staple only (67 and 63 minutes) constructs compared to plate-and-screw only fixation (105 and 95 minutes) ( P   ≤  .0001 and .0003). There was no difference in reoperation rates among patients with different fixation types., Conclusion: We found that use of nitinol compression staple and bone autograft in primary arthrodesis of Lisfranc and midfoot fracture-dislocations was associated with both improved union rates and shorter tourniquet and operative times compared to traditional plate-and-screw fixation techniques., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Todd A. Irwin, MD, reports royalties or licenses and consulting fees from Paragon 28 and MEDLINE. Bruce E. Cohen, MD, reports royalties or licenses and consulting fees from Stryker. J. Kent Ellington, MD, reports royalties or licenses from Synthes, Stryker, and MEDLINE, and consulting fees from Stryker and MEDLINE. Carroll P. Jones III, MD, reports royalties or licenses and consulting fees from Stryker (EasyFuse Staples). Scott B. Shawen, MD, reports royalties or licenses; consulting fees; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from CrossRoads Extremities, Synthes, J&J; Medline Industries; and patents planned, issued, or pending from CrossRoads Extremities. Samuel E. Ford, MD, reports consulting fees from Stryker. Disclosure forms for all authors are available online.

Background: As clinical suspicion increases and radiographic evaluation improves, navicular stress fractures are becoming a more recognized injury. To date, there is a small volume of literature examining these stress fractures, particularly as it pertains to outcomes of surgical management., Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and computed tomography (CT) outcomes of surgically treated navicular stress fractures., Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4., Methods: Ten navicular stress fractures in 10 patients were available for follow-up at an average of 42.4 months postoperatively (range, 16.8-79.9). These patients underwent a clinical examination and a CT scan of their operatively treated foot. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) and SF-36 scores were completed for each fracture at the time of examination. The CT scans were blindly evaluated for bony union., Results: According to the CT scan evaluation, 8 of 10 navicula (80%) had gone on to union. Clinical outcome scores on all patients were an average AOFAS hindfoot score of 88.5 and an average SF-36 score of 88.3. The feet with united fractures had an average AOFAS score of 92.1 (range, 83-100) and an average SF-36 score of 91.9 (range, 79-98). The 2 patients with nonunions had AOFAS scores of 74 and 74 and SF-36 scores of 70 and 78, respectively. Both nonunions were complete, displaced fractures on preoperative imaging., Conclusion: In our series of operatively treated navicular stress fractures, 80% went on to union, as verified by CT scan. Patients with united fractures had a clinically significant improvement in outcome, with higher AOFAS and SF-36 scores as compared with the 2 patients with nonunions. Patients with complete, displaced navicular stress fractures may be more likely to develop nonunions.