Search

Background: Antiseizure medications can have negative effects on plasma lipid levels. Objectives: To evaluate plasma lipid changes in patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy treated with eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) or controlled-release carbamazepine (CBZ-CR) monotherapy during a phase III, randomized, double-blind (DB) trial and 2 years of ESL treatment in an open-label extension (OLE). Design: Post hoc analysis of a phase III trial and OLE study. Methods: Proportions of patients with elevated levels of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were assessed at DB baseline, OLE baseline (last visit of DB trial), and end of OLE. Results: A total of 184 patients received ESL monotherapy during the OLE: 96 received ESL monotherapy in the DB trial and 88 patients received CBZ-CR monotherapy. The proportions of patients with elevated total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol increased significantly during the DB trial in those treated with CBZ-CR monotherapy [total cholesterol, +14.9% (p < 0.001); LDL cholesterol, +11.5% (p = 0.012)] but decreased significantly after switching to ESL monotherapy in the OLE [total cholesterol, −15.3% (p = 0.008); LDL cholesterol, −11.1% (p = 0.021)]. No significant changes were observed in those treated with ESL monotherapy during the DB trial and OLE. At the end of the DB trial, between-group differences (ESL–CBZ-CR) in the proportions of patients with elevated total and LDL cholesterol were −13.6% (p = 0.037) and −12.3% (p = 0.061), respectively; at the end of the OLE, these between-group differences were −6.0% (p = 0.360) and −0.6% (p = 1.000), respectively. Conclusion: A lower proportion of patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy had increased levels of total and LDL cholesterol, compared to baseline, following monotherapy with ESL versus CBZ-CR; after switching from CBZ-CR to ESL, the proportions of patients with increased levels decreased significantly. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01162460/NCT02484001; EudraCT 2009-011135-13/2015-001243-36. Plain language summary The impact of treatment with either eslicarbazepine acetate or controlled-release carbamazepine on cholesterol levels in patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy Patients with epilepsy have an increased risk of having cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (e.g., myocardial infarction and stroke). Treatment with antiseizure medications can have a negative effect on blood cholesterol levels [such as total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol], which can further increase the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. We examined the impact of monotherapy treatment (i.e., treatment with only one antiseizure medication) using either eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) or a controlled-release formulation of carbamazepine (CBZ-CR) in 184 patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy (ESL, 96 patients; CBZ-CR, 88 patients). Patients received monotherapy with ESL or CBZ-CR for approximately 1 year in a phase III clinical trial. After this, the patients could continue into a 2-year extension study during which they all received monotherapy with ESL. We assessed the proportions of patients with elevated levels of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol at the beginning and end of the phase III trial, and at the end of the extension study. At the beginning of the phase III trial, the proportions of patients with elevated total cholesterol and elevated LDL cholesterol were similar between treatment groups. During the phase III trial, the proportions of patients with elevated total cholesterol and elevated LDL cholesterol increased in those treated with CBZ-CR monotherapy (total cholesterol, +14.9%; LDL cholesterol, +11.5%) but decreased after switching to ESL monotherapy in the extension study (total cholesterol, −15.3%; LDL cholesterol, −11.1%). By contrast, the proportions of patients with elevated levels of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol remained relatively stable in those treated with ESL monotherapy during the phase III trial and extension study. These findings indicate that ESL monotherapy may be an appropriate treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy who either already have, or who are at risk of developing, high levels of cholesterol, since this may reduce their likelihood of having cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once‐daily (QD), oral anti‐seizure medication for the treatment of focal (partial‐onset) seizures. Here, we evaluate risk factors for the development of psychiatric treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in clinical trials of adjunctive ESL in adults with focal seizures. Methods: This post‐hoc analysis evaluated data pooled from three Phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials (BIA‐2093‐301, ‐302, ‐304). After an 8‐week baseline period, patients were randomized equally to receive placebo, ESL 400 mg (not reported here), 800 mg, or 1200 mg QD (up to 2‐week titration; 12‐week maintenance; optional open‐label extension [OLE]). Incidences of psychiatric TEAEs were evaluated according to three separate criteria: medical history of psychiatric disorders (yes/no); baseline use of psychotropic drugs (yes/no); Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score at baseline (0–6: normal; 7–19: mild depression; 20–34: moderate depression). Results: The analysis populations comprised 1251 patients for the controlled study period and 1137 patients for the 1‐year OLE. Psychiatric TEAE incidence was similar between patients taking ESL and placebo in the controlled and OLE study periods and was not related to ESL dose. Psychiatric TEAEs generally occurred more frequently in patients with a medical history of psychiatric disorders, using psychotropic drugs, or with depressive symptoms than in those without a history, not using psychotropic drugs, or with no depressive symptoms. Depression and anxiety were the most frequently reported psychiatric TEAEs. Significance: Overall, in clinical trials of ESL in adults with focal seizures, incidences of psychiatric events were not statistically different between patients taking ESL and placebo, were not related to ESL dose, and generally occurred more frequently in patients with baseline psychiatric symptoms or a history of psychiatric disorders. Long‐term exposure to ESL was not associated with a marked increase in the incidence of psychiatric TEAEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) monotherapy during long-term treatment., Methods: An open-label extension (OLE) study was conducted in adults completing a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial, during which they had received monotherapy with either once-daily ESL or twice-daily controlled-release carbamazepine (CBZ-CR) for newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. In the OLE study, all patients received ESL (800-1600 mg/d) for 2 years. Primary efficacy outcome was retention time (from baseline of the OLE study). Secondary efficacy assessments included seizure freedom rate (no seizures during the OLE study) and responder rate (≥50% seizure frequency reduction from baseline of double-blind trial). Safety assessments included evaluation of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)., Results: Of 206 randomized patients, 96 who received ESL in the double-blind trial (ESL/ESL) and 88 who received CBZ-CR in the double-blind trial (CBZ-CR/ESL) were treated with ESL monotherapy (89.3% overall). Treatment retention time was similar between groups, with low probability of ESL withdrawal overall (<0.07 at any time). After 24 months, the probability of ESL withdrawal was 0.0638 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.0292-0.1366) in the ESL/ESL group and 0.0472 (95% CI = 0.0180-0.1210) in the CBZ-CR/ESL group. Seizure freedom rates were 90.6% (ESL/ESL) and 80.7% (CBZ-CR/ESL; P = .0531). Responder rates remained >80% in both groups throughout the study. Incidence of serious TEAEs was similar between groups (7.3% vs 5.7%; 0% vs 1.1% possibly related), as were the incidences of TEAEs considered at least possibly related to treatment (17.7% vs 18.2%) and TEAEs leading to discontinuation (3.1% vs 4.5%). The types of TEAEs were generally consistent with the known safety profile of ESL., Significance: ESL monotherapy was efficacious and generally well tolerated over the long term, including in patients who transitioned from CBZ-CR monotherapy. No new safety concerns emerged., (© 2020 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.)