183 results on '"Hucka Michael"'
Search Results
2. Specifications of standards in systems and synthetic biology: status and developments in 2021
- Author
-
Schreiber Falk, Gleeson Padraig, Golebiewski Martin, Gorochowski Thomas E., Hucka Michael, Keating Sarah M., König Matthias, Myers Chris J., Nickerson David P., Sommer Björn, and Waltemath Dagmar
- Subjects
Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
This special issue of the Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics contains updated specifications of COMBINE standards in systems and synthetic biology. The 2021 special issue presents four updates of standards: Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual Version 2.3, Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual Version 3.0, Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language Level 1 Version 4, and OMEX Metadata specification Version 1.2. This document can also be consulted to identify the latest specifications of all COMBINE standards.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. The first 10 years of the international coordination network for standards in systems and synthetic biology (COMBINE)
- Author
-
Waltemath Dagmar, Golebiewski Martin, Blinov Michael L, Gleeson Padraig, Hermjakob Henning, Hucka Michael, Inau Esther Thea, Keating Sarah M, König Matthias, Krebs Olga, Malik-Sheriff Rahuman S, Nickerson David, Oberortner Ernst, Sauro Herbert M, Schreiber Falk, Smith Lucian, Stefan Melanie I, Wittig Ulrike, and Myers Chris J
- Subjects
combine ,community building ,meeting report ,standardization ,Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
This paper presents a report on outcomes of the 10th Computational Modeling in Biology Network (COMBINE) meeting that was held in Heidelberg, Germany, in July of 2019. The annual event brings together researchers, biocurators and software engineers to present recent results and discuss future work in the area of standards for systems and synthetic biology. The COMBINE initiative coordinates the development of various community standards and formats for computational models in the life sciences. Over the past 10 years, COMBINE has brought together standard communities that have further developed and harmonized their standards for better interoperability of models and data. COMBINE 2019 was co-located with a stakeholder workshop of the European EU-STANDS4PM initiative that aims at harmonized data and model standardization for in silico models in the field of personalized medicine, as well as with the FAIRDOM PALs meeting to discuss findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR) data sharing. This report briefly describes the work discussed in invited and contributed talks as well as during breakout sessions. It also highlights recent advancements in data, model, and annotation standardization efforts. Finally, this report concludes with some challenges and opportunities that this community will face during the next 10 years.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Specifications of standards in systems and synthetic biology: status and developments in 2020
- Author
-
Schreiber Falk, Sommer Björn, Czauderna Tobias, Golebiewski Martin, Gorochowski Thomas E., Hucka Michael, Keating Sarah M., König Matthias, Myers Chris, Nickerson David, and Waltemath Dagmar
- Subjects
ontologies ,standards ,systems biology ,synthetic biology ,Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
This special issue of the Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics presents papers related to the 10th COMBINE meeting together with the annual update of COMBINE standards in systems and synthetic biology.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology: Status and Developments in 2019
- Author
-
Schreiber Falk, Sommer Björn, Bader Gary D., Gleeson Padraig, Golebiewski Martin, Hucka Michael, Keating Sarah M., König Matthias, Myers Chris, Nickerson David, and Waltemath Dagmar
- Subjects
Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
This special issue of the Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics presents an overview of COMBINE standards and their latest specifications. The standards cover representation formats for computational modeling in synthetic and systems biology and include BioPAX, CellML, NeuroML, SBML, SBGN, SBOL and SED-ML. The articles in this issue contain updated specifications of SBGN Process Description Level 1 Version 2, SBML Level 3 Core Version 2 Release 2, SBOL Version 2.3.0, and SBOL Visual Version 2.1.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Systems biology markup language (SBML) level 3 package: multistate, multicomponent and multicompartment species, version 1, release 2
- Author
-
Zhang Fengkai, Smith Lucian P., Blinov Michael L., Faeder James, Hlavacek William S., Juan Tapia Jose, Keating Sarah M., Rodriguez Nicolas, Dräger Andreas, Harris Leonard A., Finney Andrew, Hu Bin, Hucka Michael, and Meier-Schellersheim Martin
- Subjects
rule-based modeling ,specification ,standard ,systems biology ,Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
Rule-based modeling is an approach that permits constructing reaction networks based on the specification of rules for molecular interactions and transformations. These rules can encompass details such as the interacting sub-molecular domains and the states and binding status of the involved components. Conceptually, fine-grained spatial information such as locations can also be provided. Through “wildcards” representing component states, entire families of molecule complexes sharing certain properties can be specified as patterns. This can significantly simplify the definition of models involving species with multiple components, multiple states, and multiple compartments. The systems biology markup language (SBML) Level 3 Multi Package Version 1 extends the SBML Level 3 Version 1 core with the “type” concept in the Species and Compartment classes. Therefore, reaction rules may contain species that can be patterns and exist in multiple locations. Multiple software tools such as Simmune and BioNetGen support this standard that thus also becomes a medium for exchanging rule-based models. This document provides the specification for Release 2 of Version 1 of the SBML Level 3 Multi package. No design changes have been made to the description of models between Release 1 and Release 2; changes are restricted to the correction of errata and the addition of clarifications.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) Level 3 Package: Distributions, Version 1, Release 1
- Author
-
Smith Lucian P., Moodie Stuart L., Bergmann Frank T., Gillespie Colin, Keating Sarah M., König Matthias, Myers Chris J., Swat Maciek J., Wilkinson Darren J., and Hucka Michael
- Subjects
distributions ,modeling ,sbml ,systems biology ,uncertainty ,Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
Biological models often contain elements that have inexact numerical values, since they are based on values that are stochastic in nature or data that contains uncertainty. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) Level 3 Core specification does not include an explicit mechanism to include inexact or stochastic values in a model, but it does provide a mechanism for SBML packages to extend the Core specification and add additional syntactic constructs. The SBML Distributions package for SBML Level 3 adds the necessary features to allow models to encode information about the distribution and uncertainty of values underlying a quantity.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology: Status and Developments in 2017
- Author
-
Schreiber Falk, Bader Gary D., Gleeson Padraig, Golebiewski Martin, Hucka Michael, Keating Sarah M., Novère Nicolas Le, Myers Chris, Nickerson David, Sommer Björn, and Waltemath Dagmar
- Subjects
combine ,systems biology ,synthetic biology ,standards ,Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
Standards are essential to the advancement of Systems and Synthetic Biology. COMBINE provides a formal body and a centralised platform to help develop and disseminate relevant standards and related resources. The regular special issue of the Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics aims to support the exchange, distribution and archiving of these standards by providing unified, easily citable access. This paper provides an overview of existing COMBINE standards and presents developments of the last year.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML): Language Specification for Level 3 Version 2 Core Release 2
- Author
-
Hucka Michael, Bergmann Frank T., Chaouiya Claudine, Dräger Andreas, Hoops Stefan, Keating Sarah M., König Matthias, Novère Nicolas Le, Myers Chris J., Olivier Brett G., Sahle Sven, Schaff James C., Sheriff Rahuman, Smith Lucian P., Waltemath Dagmar, Wilkinson Darren J., and Zhang Fengkai
- Subjects
systems biology markup language ,standards ,visualization ,representation ,Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
Computational models can help researchers to interpret data, understand biological functions, and make quantitative predictions. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) is a file format for representing computational models in a declarative form that different software systems can exchange. SBML is oriented towards describing biological processes of the sort common in research on a number of topics, including metabolic pathways, cell signaling pathways, and many others. By supporting SBML as an input/output format, different tools can all operate on an identical representation of a model, removing opportunities for translation errors and assuring a common starting point for analyses and simulations. This document provides the specification for Release 2 of Version 2 of SBML Level 3 Core. The specification defines the data structures prescribed by SBML as well as their encoding in XML, the eXtensible Markup Language. Release 2 corrects some errors and clarifies some ambiguities discovered in Release 1. This specification also defines validation rules that determine the validity of an SBML document, and provides many examples of models in SBML form. Other materials and software are available from the SBML project website at http://sbml.org/.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology: Status and Developments in 2016
- Author
-
Schreiber Falk, Bader Gary D., Gleeson Padraig, Golebiewski Martin, Hucka Michael, Novère Nicolas Le, Myers Chris, Nickerson David, Sommer Björn, and Waltemath Dagmar
- Subjects
Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
Standards are essential to the advancement of science and technology. In systems and synthetic biology, numerous standards and associated tools have been developed over the last 16 years. This special issue of the Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics aims to support the exchange, distribution and archiving of these standards, as well as to provide centralised and easily citable access to them.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. SBML Level 3 package: Groups, Version 1 Release 1
- Author
-
Hucka Michael and Smith Lucian P.
- Subjects
Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
Biological models often contain components that have relationships with each other, or that modelers want to treat as belonging to groups with common characteristics or shared metadata. The SBML Level 3 Version 1 Core specification does not provide a n explicit mechanism for expressing such relationships, but it does provide a mechanism for SBML packages to extend the Core specification and add additional syntactical constructs. The SBML Groups package for SBML Level 3 adds the necessary features to SBML to allow grouping of model components to be expressed. Such groups do not affect the mathematical interpretation of a model, but they do provide a way to add information that can be useful for modelers and software tools. The SBML Groups package enables a modeler to include definitions of groups and nested groups, each of which may be annotated to convey why that group was created, and what it represents.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML): Language Specification for Level 3 Version 1 Core
- Author
-
Hucka Michael, Bergmann Frank T., Dräger Andreas, Hoops Stefan, Keating Sarah M., Le Novère Nicolas, Myers Chris J., Olivier Brett G., Sahle Sven, Schaff James C., Smith Lucian P., Waltemath Dagmar, and Wilkinson Darren J.
- Subjects
sbml ,modeling ,standards ,Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
Computational models can help researchers to interpret data, understand biological functions, and make quantitative predictions. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) is a file format for representing computational models in a declarative form that different software systems can exchange. SBML is oriented towards describing biological processes of the sort common in research on a number of topics, including metabolic pathways, cell signaling pathways, and many others. By supporting SBML as an input/output format, different tools can all operate on an identical representation of a model, removing opportunities for translation errors and assuring a common starting point for analyses and simulations. This document provides the specification for Release 2 of Version 1 of SBML Level 3 Core. The specification defines the data structures prescribed by SBML, their encoding in XML (the eXtensible Markup Language), validation rules that determine the validity of an SBML document, and examples of models in SBML form. No design changes have been made to the description of models between Release 1 and Release 2; changes are restricted to the format of annotations, the correction of errata and the addition of clarifications. Other materials and software are available from the SBML project website at http://sbml.org/.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML): Language Specification for Level 3 Version 2 Core
- Author
-
Hucka Michael, Bergmann Frank T., Dräger Andreas, Hoops Stefan, Keating Sarah M., Le Novère Nicolas, Myers Chris J., Olivier Brett G., Sahle Sven, Schaff James C., Smith Lucian P., Waltemath Dagmar, and Wilkinson Darren J.
- Subjects
sbml ,modeling ,computational biology ,systems biology ,standards ,Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
Computational models can help researchers to interpret data, understand biological functions, and make quantitative predictions. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) is a file format for representing computational models in a declarative form that different software systems can exchange. SBML is oriented towards describing biological processes of the sort common in research on a number of topics, including metabolic pathways, cell signaling pathways, and many others. By supporting SBML as an input/output format, different tools can all operate on an identical representation of a model, removing opportunities for translation errors and assuring a common starting point for analyses and simulations. This document provides the specification for Version 2 of SBML Level 3 Core. The specification defines the data structures prescribed by SBML, their encoding in XML (the eXtensible Markup Language), validation rules that determine the validity of an SBML document, and examples of models in SBML form. The design of Version 2 differs from Version 1 principally in allowing new MathML constructs, making more child elements optional, and adding identifiers to all SBML elements instead of only selected elements. Other materials and software are available from the SBML project website at http://sbml.org/.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) Level 2 Version 5: Structures and Facilities for Model Definitions
- Author
-
Hucka Michael, Bergmann Frank T., Dräger Andreas, Hoops Stefan, Keating Sarah M., Le Novère Nicolas, Myers Chris J., Olivier Brett G., Sahle Sven, Schaff James C., Smith Lucian P., Waltemath Dagmar, and Wilkinson Darren J.
- Subjects
Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
Computational models can help researchers to interpret data, understand biological function, and make quantitative predictions. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) is a file format for representing computational models in a declarative form that can be exchanged between different software systems. SBML is oriented towards describing biological processes of the sort common in research on a number of topics, including metabolic pathways, cell signaling pathways, and many others. By supporting SBML as an input/output format, different tools can all operate on an identical representation of a model, removing opportunities for translation errors and assuring a common starting point for analyses and simulations. This document provides the specification for Version 5 of SBML Level 2. The specification defines the data structures prescribed by SBML as well as their encoding in XML, the eXtensible Markup Language. This specification also defines validation rules that determine the validity of an SBML document, and provides many examples of models in SBML form. Other materials and software are available from the SBML project web site, http://sbml.org/.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. SBML Level 3 package: Hierarchical Model Composition, Version 1 Release 3
- Author
-
Smith Lucian P., Hucka Michael, Hoops Stefan, Finney Andrew, Ginkel Martin, Myers Chris J., Moraru Ion, and Liebermeister Wolfram
- Subjects
Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
Constructing a model in a hierarchical fashion is a natural approach to managing model complexity, and offers additional opportunities such as the potential to re-use model components. The SBML Level 3 Version 1 Core specification does not directly provide a mechanism for defining hierarchical models, but it does provide a mechanism for SBML packages to extend the Core specification and add additional syntactical constructs. The SBML Hierarchical Model Composition package for SBML Level 3 adds the necessary features to SBML to support hierarchical modeling. The package enables a modeler to include submodels within an enclosing SBML model, delete unneeded or redundant elements of that submodel, replace elements of that submodel with element of the containing model, and replace elements of the containing model with elements of the submodel. In addition, the package defines an optional “port” construct, allowing a model to be defined with suggested interfaces between hierarchical components; modelers can chose to use these interfaces, but they are not required to do so and can still interact directly with model elements if they so chose. Finally, the SBML Hierarchical Model Composition package is defined in such a way that a hierarchical model can be “flattened” to an equivalent, non-hierarchical version that uses only plain SBML constructs, thus enabling software tools that do not yet support hierarchy to nevertheless work with SBML hierarchical models.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML): Language Specification for Level 3 Version 1 Core
- Author
-
Hucka Michael, Bergmann Frank T., Hoops Stefan, Keating Sarah M., Sahle Sven, Schaff James C., Smith Lucian P., and Wilkinson Darren J.
- Subjects
Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
Computational models can help researchers to interpret data, understand biological function, and make quantitative predictions. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) is a file format for representing computational models in a declarative form that can be exchanged between different software systems. SBML is oriented towards describing biological processes of the sort common in research on a number of topics, including metabolic pathways, cell signaling pathways, and many others. By supporting SBML as an input/output format, different tools can all operate on an identical representation of a model, removing opportunities for translation errors and assuring a common starting point for analyses and simulations. This document provides the specification for Version 1 of SBML Level 3 Core. The specification defines the data structures prescribed by SBML as well as their encoding in XML, the eXtensible Markup Language. This specification also defines validation rules that determine the validity of an SBML document, and provides many examples of models in SBML form. Other materials and software are available from the SBML project web site, http://sbml.org/.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology
- Author
-
Schreiber Falk, Bader Gary D., Golebiewski Martin, Hucka Michael, Kormeier Benjamin, Le Novère Nicolas, Myers Chris, Nickerson David, Sommer Björn, Waltemath Dagmar, and Weise Stephan
- Subjects
Biotechnology ,TP248.13-248.65 - Abstract
Standards shape our everyday life. From nuts and bolts to electronic devices and technological processes, standardised products and processes are all around us. Standards have technological and economic benefits, such as making information exchange, production, and services more efficient. However, novel, innovative areas often either lack proper standards, or documents about standards in these areas are not available from a centralised platform or formal body (such as the International Standardisation Organisation).
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Software that goes with the flow in systems biology
- Author
-
Le Novère Nicolas and Hucka Michael
- Subjects
Biology (General) ,QH301-705.5 - Abstract
Abstract A recent article in BMC Bioinformatics describes new advances in workflow systems for computational modeling in systems biology. Such systems can accelerate, and improve the consistency of, modeling through automation not only at the simulation and results-production stages, but also at the model-generation stage. Their work is a harbinger of the next generation of more powerful software for systems biologists. See research article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/11/582/abstract/ Ever since the rise of systems biology at the end of the last century, mathematical representations of biological systems and their activities have flourished. They are being used to describe everything from biomolecular networks, such as gene regulation, metabolic processes and signaling pathways, at the lowest biological scales, to tissue growth and differentiation, drug effects, environmental interactions, and more. A very active area in the field has been the development of techniques that facilitate the construction, analysis and dissemination of computational models. The heterogeneous, distributed nature of most data resources today has increased not only the opportunities for, but also the difficulties of, developing software systems to support these tasks. The work by Li et al. 1 published in BMC Bioinformatics represents a promising evolutionary step forward in this area. They describe a workflow system - a visual software environment enabling a user to create a connected set of operations to be performed sequentially using seperate tools and resources. Their system uses third-party data resources accessible over the Internet to elaborate and parametrize (that is, assign parameter values to) computational models in a semi-automated manner. In Li et al.'s work, the authors point towards a promising future for computational modeling and simultaneously highlight some of the difficulties that need to be overcome before we get there.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. SBML qualitative models: a model representation format and infrastructure to foster interactions between qualitative modelling formalisms and tools
- Author
-
Chaouiya, Claudine, Bérenguier, Duncan, Keating, Sarah M, Naldi, Aurélien, van Iersel, Martijn P, Rodriguez, Nicolas, Dräger, Andreas, Büchel, Finja, Cokelaer, Thomas, Kowal, Bryan, Wicks, Benjamin, Gonçalves, Emanuel, Dorier, Julien, Page, Michel, Monteiro, Pedro T, von Kamp, Axel, Xenarios, Ioannis, de Jong, Hidde, Hucka, Michael, Klamt, Steffen, Thieffry, Denis, Le Novère, Nicolas, Saez-Rodriguez, Julio, and Helikar, Tomáš
- Abstract
Abstract Background Qualitative frameworks, especially those based on the logical discrete formalism, are increasingly used to model regulatory and signalling networks. A major advantage of these frameworks is that they do not require precise quantitative data, and that they are well-suited for studies of large networks. While numerous groups have developed specific computational tools that provide original methods to analyse qualitative models, a standard format to exchange qualitative models has been missing. Results We present the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) Qualitative Models Package (“qual”), an extension of the SBML Level 3 standard designed for computer representation of qualitative models of biological networks. We demonstrate the interoperability of models via SBML qual through the analysis of a specific signalling network by three independent software tools. Furthermore, the collective effort to define the SBML qual format paved the way for the development of LogicalModel, an open-source model library, which will facilitate the adoption of the format as well as the collaborative development of algorithms to analyse qualitative models. Conclusions SBML qual allows the exchange of qualitative models among a number of complementary software tools. SBML qual has the potential to promote collaborative work on the development of novel computational approaches, as well as on the specification and the analysis of comprehensive qualitative models of regulatory and signalling networks.
- Published
- 2013
20. Path2Models: large-scale generation of computational models from biochemical pathway maps
- Author
-
Büchel, Finja, Rodriguez, Nicolas, Swainston, Neil, Wrzodek, Clemens, Czauderna, Tobias, Keller, Roland, Mittag, Florian, Schubert, Michael, Glont, Mihai, Golebiewski, Martin, van Iersel, Martijn, Keating, Sarah, Rall, Matthias, Wybrow, Michael, Hermjakob, Henning, Hucka, Michael, Kell, Douglas B, Müller, Wolfgang, Mendes, Pedro, Zell, Andreas, Chaouiya, Claudine, Saez-Rodriguez, Julio, Schreiber, Falk, Laibe, Camille, Dräger, Andreas, and Le Novère, Nicolas
- Abstract
Abstract Background Systems biology projects and omics technologies have led to a growing number of biochemical pathway models and reconstructions. However, the majority of these models are still created de novo, based on literature mining and the manual processing of pathway data. Results To increase the efficiency of model creation, the Path2Models project has automatically generated mathematical models from pathway representations using a suite of freely available software. Data sources include KEGG, BioCarta, MetaCyc and SABIO-RK. Depending on the source data, three types of models are provided: kinetic, logical and constraint-based. Models from over 2 600 organisms are encoded consistently in SBML, and are made freely available through BioModels Database at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels-main/path2models. Each model contains the list of participants, their interactions, the relevant mathematical constructs, and initial parameter values. Most models are also available as easy-to-understand graphical SBGN maps. Conclusions To date, the project has resulted in more than 140 000 freely available models. Such a resource can tremendously accelerate the development of mathematical models by providing initial starting models for simulation and analysis, which can be subsequently curated and further parameterized.
- Published
- 2013
21. Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models using the COBRA Toolbox v.3.0
- Author
-
Heirendt, Laurent, Arreckx, Sylvain, Pfau, Thomas, Mendoza, Sebastián N., Richelle, Anne, Heinken, Almut, Haraldsdóttir, Hulda S., Wachowiak, Jacek, Keating, Sarah M., Vlasov, Vanja, Magnusdóttir, Stefania, Ng, Chiam Yu, Preciat, German, Žagare, Alise, Chan, Siu H. J., Aurich, Maike K., Clancy, Catherine M., Modamio, Jennifer, Sauls, John T., Noronha, Alberto, Bordbar, Aarash, Cousins, Benjamin, El Assal, Diana C., Valcarcel, Luis V., Apaolaza, Iñigo, Ghaderi, Susan, Ahookhosh, Masoud, Ben Guebila, Marouen, Kostromins, Andrejs, Sompairac, Nicolas, Le, Hoai M., Ma, Ding, Sun, Yuekai, Wang, Lin, Yurkovich, James T., Oliveira, Miguel A. P., Vuong, Phan T., El Assal, Lemmer P., Kuperstein, Inna, Zinovyev, Andrei, Hinton, H. Scott, Bryant, William A., Aragón Artacho, Francisco J., Planes, Francisco J., Stalidzans, Egils, Maass, Alejandro, Vempala, Santosh, Hucka, Michael, Saunders, Michael A., Maranas, Costas D., Lewis, Nathan E., Sauter, Thomas, Palsson, Bernhard Ø., Thiele, Ines, and Fleming, Ronan M. T.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. SBML Level 3: an extensible format for the exchange and reuse of biological models
- Author
-
Keating, Sarah M, Waltemath, Dagmar, König, Matthias, Zhang, Fengkai, Dräger, Andreas, Chaouiya, Claudine, Bergmann, Frank T, Finney, Andrew, Gillespie, Colin S, Helikar, Tomáš, Hoops, Stefan, Malik‐Sheriff, Rahuman S, Moodie, Stuart L, Moraru, Ion I, Myers, Chris J, Naldi, Aurélien, Olivier, Brett G, Sahle, Sven, Schaff, James C, Smith, Lucian P, Swat, Maciej J, Thieffry, Denis, Watanabe, Leandro, Wilkinson, Darren J, Blinov, Michael L, Begley, Kimberly, Faeder, James R, Gómez, Harold F, Hamm, Thomas M, Inagaki, Yuichiro, Liebermeister, Wolfram, Lister, Allyson L, Lucio, Daniel, Mjolsness, Eric, Proctor, Carole J, Raman, Karthik, Rodriguez, Nicolas, Shaffer, Clifford A, Shapiro, Bruce E, Stelling, Joerg, Swainston, Neil, Tanimura, Naoki, Wagner, John, Meier‐Schellersheim, Martin, Sauro, Herbert M, Palsson, Bernhard, Bolouri, Hamid, Kitano, Hiroaki, Funahashi, Akira, Hermjakob, Henning, Doyle, John C, Hucka, Michael, Adams, Richard R, Allen, Nicholas A, Angermann, Bastian R, Antoniotti, Marco, Bader, Gary D, Červený, Jan, Courtot, Mélanie, Cox, Chris D, Dalle Pezze, Piero, Demir, Emek, Denney, William S, Dharuri, Harish, Dorier, Julien, Drasdo, Dirk, Ebrahim, Ali, Eichner, Johannes, Elf, Johan, Endler, Lukas, Evelo, Chris T, Flamm, Christoph, Fleming, Ronan MT, Fröhlich, Martina, Glont, Mihai, Gonçalves, Emanuel, Golebiewski, Martin, Grabski, Hovakim, Gutteridge, Alex, Hachmeister, Damon, Harris, Leonard A, Heavner, Benjamin D, Henkel, Ron, Hlavacek, William S, Hu, Bin, Hyduke, Daniel R, de Jong, Hidde, Juty, Nick, Karp, Peter D, Karr, Jonathan R, Kell, Douglas B, Keller, Roland, Kiselev, Ilya, Klamt, Steffen, Klipp, Edda, Knüpfer, Christian, Kolpakov, Fedor, Krause, Falko, Kutmon, Martina, Laibe, Camille, Lawless, Conor, Li, Lu, Loew, Leslie M, Machne, Rainer, Matsuoka, Yukiko, Mendes, Pedro, Mi, Huaiyu, Mittag, Florian, Monteiro, Pedro T, Natarajan, Kedar Nath, Nielsen, Poul MF, Nguyen, Tramy, Palmisano, Alida, Pettit, Jean‐Baptiste, Pfau, Thomas, Phair, Robert D, Radivoyevitch, Tomas, Rohwer, Johann M, Ruebenacker, Oliver A, Saez‐Rodriguez, Julio, Scharm, Martin, Schmidt, Henning, Schreiber, Falk, Schubert, Michael, Schulte, Roman, Sealfon, Stuart C, Smallbone, Kieran, Soliman, Sylvain, Stefan, Melanie I, Sullivan, Devin P, Takahashi, Koichi, Teusink, Bas, Tolnay, David, Vazirabad, Ibrahim, von Kamp, Axel, Wittig, Ulrike, Wrzodek, Clemens, Wrzodek, Finja, Xenarios, Ioannis, Zhukova, Anna, and Zucker, Jeremy
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Towards NeuroML: Model Description Methods for Collaborative Modelling in Neuroscience
- Author
-
Goddard, Nigel H., Hucka, Michael, Howell, Fred, Cornelis, Hugo, Shankar, Kavita, and Beeman, David
- Published
- 2001
24. Correction to: Meeting report from the fourth meeting of the Computational Modeling in Biology Network (COMBINE)
- Author
-
Waltemath, Dagmar, Bergmann, Frank T., Chaouiya, Claudine, Czauderna, Tobias, Gleeson, Padraig, Goble, Carole, Golebiewski, Martin, Hucka, Michael, Juty, Nick, Krebs, Olga, Le Novère, Nicolas, Mi, Huaiyu, Moraru, Ion I., Myers, Chris J., Nickerson, David, Olivier, Brett G., Rodriguez, Nicolas, Schreiber, Falk, Smith, Lucian, Zhang, Fengkai, and Bonnet, Eric
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. The Modeler’s Workspace : Making Model-Based Studies of the Nervous System More Accessible
- Author
-
Hucka, Michael, Shankar, Kavita, Beeman, David, Bower, James M., and Ascoli, Giorgio A., editor
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Meeting report from the fourth meeting of the Computational Modeling in Biology Network (COMBINE)
- Author
-
Waltemath, Dagmar, Bergmann, Frank T., Chaouiya, Claudine, Czauderna, Tobias, Gleeson, Padraig, Goble, Carole, Golebiewski, Martin, Hucka, Michael, Juty, Nick, Krebs, Olga, Le Novère, Nicolas, Mi, Huaiyu, Moraru, Ion I., Myers, Chris J., Nickerson, David, Olivier, Brett G., Rodriguez, Nicolas, Schreiber, Falk, Smith, Lucian, Zhang, Fengkai, and Bonnet, Eric
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. JSBML 1.0: providing a smorgasbord of options to encode systems biology models
- Author
-
Rodriguez, Nicolas, Thomas, Alex, Watanabe, Leandro, Vazirabad, Ibrahim Y., Kofia, Victor, Gómez, Harold F., Mittag, Florian, Matthes, Jakob, Rudolph, Jan, Wrzodek, Finja, Netz, Eugen, Diamantikos, Alexander, Eichner, Johannes, Keller, Roland, Wrzodek, Clemens, Fröhlich, Sebastian, Lewis, Nathan E., Myers, Chris J., Le Novère, Nicolas, Palsson, Bernhard Ø., Hucka, Michael, and Dräger, Andreas
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. BioModels: ten-year anniversary
- Author
-
Chelliah, Vijayalakshmi, Juty, Nick, Ajmera, Ishan, Ali, Raza, Dumousseau, Marine, Glont, Mihai, Hucka, Michael, Jalowicki, Gaël, Keating, Sarah, Knight-Schrijver, Vincent, Lloret-Villas, Audald, Natarajan, Kedar Nath, Pettit, Jean-Baptiste, Rodriguez, Nicolas, Schubert, Michael, Wimalaratne, Sarala M., Zhao, Yangyang, Hermjakob, Henning, Le Novère, Nicolas, and Laibe, Camille
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Nine Best Practices for Research Software Registries and Repositories: A Concise Guide
- Author
-
Registries, Task Force On Best Practices For Software, Monteil, Alain, Gonzalez-Beltran, Alejandra, Ioannidis, Alexandros, Allen, Alice, Lee, Allen, Bandrowski, Anita, Wilson, Bruce, Mecum, Bryce, Du, Cai Fan, Robinson, Carly, Garijo, Daniel, Katz, Daniel S., Long, David, Milliken, Genevieve, Ménager, Hervé, Hausman, Jessica, Spaaks, Jurriaan, Fenlon, Katrina, Vanderbilt, Kristin, Hwang, Lorraine, Davis, Lynn, Fenner, Martin, Crusoe, Michael, Hucka, Michael, Wu, Mingfang, Hong, Neil Chue, Teuben, Peter, Stall, Shelley, Druskat, Stephan, Carnevale, Ted, Morrell, Thomas, Information et Édition Scientifiques (IES), Inria Siège, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria), Software Heritage, Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), University of Maryland [College Park], University of Maryland System, Arizona State University [Tempe] (ASU), University of California [San Diego] (UC San Diego), University of California, Oak Ridge National Laboratory [Oak Ridge] (ORNL), UT-Battelle, LLC, University of California [Santa Barbara] (UCSB), University of Texas at Austin [Austin], U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information (DOE-OSTI), University of Southern California (USC), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign [Urbana], University of Illinois System, Brigham Young University (BYU), New York University [New York] (NYU), NYU System (NYU), Institut Pasteur [Paris], Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), NASA-California Institute of Technology (CALTECH), Netherlands eScience Center, The University of New Mexico [Albuquerque], University of California [Davis] (UC Davis), DataCite, Common Workflow Language project, California Institute of Technology (CALTECH), Australian Research Data Commons, University of Edinburgh, American Geophysical Union, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Friedrich-Schiller-Universität = Friedrich Schiller University Jena [Jena, Germany], Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Yale University [New Haven], Direction de la Culture et de l’Information Scientifiques (DCIS), Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Inria Siège, University of California (UC), University of California [Santa Barbara] (UC Santa Barbara), Institut Pasteur [Paris] (IP), American Geophysical Union [Washington], and Humboldt University Of Berlin
- Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences ,Computer Science - Computers and Society ,Computers and Society (cs.CY) ,Scientific software ,Information Transfer and Management ,Intelligente und verteilte Systeme ,[INFO.INFO-DL]Computer Science [cs]/Digital Libraries [cs.DL] ,Digital Libraries (cs.DL) ,Computer Science - Digital Libraries ,Institut für Softwaretechnologie ,cs.DL ,cs.CY ,Computing and Computers - Abstract
Scientific software registries and repositories serve various roles in their respective disciplines. These resources improve software discoverability and research transparency, provide information for software citations, and foster preservation of computational methods that might otherwise be lost over time, thereby supporting research reproducibility and replicability. However, developing these resources takes effort, and few guidelines are available to help prospective creators of registries and repositories. To address this need, we present a set of nine best practices that can help managers define the scope, practices, and rules that govern individual registries and repositories. These best practices were distilled from the experiences of the creators of existing resources, convened by a Task Force of the FORCE11 Software Citation Implementation Working Group during the years 2019-2020. We believe that putting in place specific policies such as those presented here will help scientific software registries and repositories better serve their users and their disciplines., 18 pages
- Published
- 2020
30. Do genome‐scale models need exact solvers or clearer standards?
- Author
-
Ebrahim, Ali, Almaas, Eivind, Bauer, Eugen, Bordbar, Aarash, Burgard, Anthony P, Chang, Roger L, Dräger, Andreas, Famili, Iman, Feist, Adam M, Fleming, Ronan MT, Fong, Stephen S, Hatzimanikatis, Vassily, Herrgård, Markus J, Holder, Allen, Hucka, Michael, Hyduke, Daniel, Jamshidi, Neema, Lee, Sang Yup, Le Novère, Nicolas, Lerman, Joshua A, Lewis, Nathan E, Ma, Ding, Mahadevan, Radhakrishnan, Maranas, Costas, Nagarajan, Harish, Navid, Ali, Nielsen, Jens, Nielsen, Lars K, Nogales, Juan, Noronha, Alberto, Pal, Csaba, Palsson, Bernhard O, Papin, Jason A, Patil, Kiran R, Price, Nathan D, Reed, Jennifer L, Saunders, Michael, Senger, Ryan S, Sonnenschein, Nikolaus, Sun, Yuekai, and Thiele, Ines
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. JSBML: a flexible Java library for working with SBML
- Author
-
Dräger, Andreas, Rodriguez, Nicolas, Dumousseau, Marine, Dörr, Alexander, Wrzodek, Clemens, Le Novère, Nicolas, Zell, Andreas, and Hucka, Michael
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. SBML2LATEX: Conversion of SBML files into human-readable reports
- Author
-
Dräger, Andreas, Planatscher, Hannes, Motsou Wouamba, Dieudonné, Schröder, Adrian, Hucka, Michael, Endler, Lukas, Golebiewski, Martin, Müller, Wolfgang, and Zell, Andreas
- Published
- 2009
33. LibSBML: an API Library for SBML
- Author
-
Bornstein, Benjamin J., Keating, Sarah M., Jouraku, Akiya, and Hucka, Michael
- Published
- 2008
34. Harmonizing semantic annotations for computational models in biology
- Author
-
Neal, Maxwell Lewis and Hucka, Michael
- Abstract
Life science researchers use computational models to articulate and test hypotheses about the behavior of biological systems. Semantic annotation is a critical component for enhancing the interoperability and reusability of such models as well as for the integration of the data needed for model parameterization and validation. Encoded as machine-readable links to knowledge resource terms, semantic annotations describe the computational or biological meaning of what models and data represent. These annotations help researchers find and repurpose models, accelerate model composition and enable knowledge integration across model repositories and experimental data stores. However, realizing the potential benefits of semantic annotation requires the development of model annotation standards that adhere to a community-based annotation protocol. Without such standards, tool developers must account for a variety of annotation formats and approaches, a situation that can become prohibitively cumbersome and which can defeat the purpose of linking model elements to controlled knowledge resource terms. Currently, no consensus protocol for semantic annotation exists among the larger biological modeling community. Here, we report on the landscape of current annotation practices among the COmputational Modeling in BIology NEtwork community and provide a set of recommendations for building a consensus approach to semantic annotation.
- Published
- 2019
35. Data Management in Computational Systems Biology
- Author
-
Stanford, Natalie J., Scharm, Martin, Dobson, Paul D., Golebiewski, Martin, Hucka, Michael, Kothamachu, Varun B., Nickerson, David, Owen, Stuart, Pahle, Jürgen, Wittig, Ulrike, Waltemath, Dagmar, Goble, Carole, Mendes, Pedro, Snoep, Jacky, Oliver, Stephen G., Castrillo, Juan I., Molecular Cell Physiology, AIMMS, Oliver, Stephen G., and Castrillo, Juan I.
- Subjects
Standards ,Computer science ,Process (engineering) ,Best practice ,Data management ,Interoperability ,Model storage ,computer.software_genre ,Reproducible research ,Set (abstract data type) ,03 medical and health sciences ,Databases ,0302 clinical medicine ,Data storage ,030304 developmental biology ,FAIR ,0303 health sciences ,Metadata ,Database ,business.industry ,Modelling biological systems ,business ,computer ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Computational systems biology involves integrating heterogeneous datasets in order to generate models. These models can assist with understanding and prediction of biological phenomena. Generating datasets and integrating them into models involves a wide range of scientific expertise. As a result these datasets are often collected by one set of researchers, and exchanged with others researchers for constructing the models. For this process to run smoothly the data and models must be FAIR—findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. In order for data and models to be FAIR they must be structured in consistent and predictable ways, and described sufficiently for other researchers to understand them. Furthermore, these data and models must be shared with other researchers, with appropriately controlled sharing permissions, before and after publication. In this chapter we explore the different data and model standards that assist with structuring, describing, and sharing. We also highlight the popular standards and sharing databases within computational systems biology.
- Published
- 2019
36. SBMLToolbox: an SBML toolbox for MATLAB users
- Author
-
Keating, Sarah M., Bornstein, Benjamin J., Finney, Andrew, and Hucka, Michael
- Published
- 2006
37. CellML2SBML: conversion of CellML into SBML
- Author
-
Schilstra, Maria J., Li, Lu, Matthews, Joanne, Finney, Andrew, Hucka, Michael, and Le Novère, Nicolas
- Published
- 2006
38. BioModels Database: a free, centralized database of curated, published, quantitative kinetic models of biochemical and cellular systems
- Author
-
Le Novère, Nicolas, Bornstein, Benjamin, Broicher, Alexander, Courtot, Mélanie, Donizelli, Marco, Dharuri, Harish, Li, Lu, Sauro, Herbert, Schilstra, Maria, Shapiro, Bruce, Snoep, Jacky L., and Hucka, Michael
- Published
- 2006
39. MathSBML: a package for manipulating SBML-based biological models
- Author
-
Shapiro, Bruce E., Hucka, Michael, Finney, Andrew, and Doyle, John
- Published
- 2004
40. Controlled vocabularies and semantics in systems biology
- Author
-
Courtot, Mélanie, Juty, Nick, Knüpfer, Christian, Waltemath, Dagmar, Zhukova, Anna, Dräger, Andreas, Dumontier, Michel, Finney, Andrew, Golebiewski, Martin, Hastings, Janna, Hoops, Stefan, Keating, Sarah, Kell, Douglas B, Kerrien, Samuel, Lawson, James, Lister, Allyson, Lu, James, Machne, Rainer, Mendes, Pedro, Pocock, Matthew, Rodriguez, Nicolas, Villeger, Alice, Wilkinson, Darren J, Wimalaratne, Sarala, Laibe, Camille, Hucka, Michael, and Le Novère, Nicolas
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Software Infrastructure for Effective Communication and Reuse of Computational Models
- Author
-
Finney, Andrew, author, Hucka, Michael, author, Bornstein, Benjamin J., author, Keating, Sarah M., author, Shapiro, Bruce E., author, Matthews, Joanne, author, Kovitz, Ben L., author, Schilstra, Maria J., author, Funahashi, Akira, author, Doyle, John, author, and Kitano, Hiroaki, author
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Escalating model sizes and complexities call for standardized forms of representation
- Author
-
Hucka, Michael and Finney, Andrew
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v3.0
- Author
-
Heirendt, Laurent, Arreckx, Sylvain, Pfau, Thomas, Mendoza, Sebasti��n N., Richelle, Anne, Heinken, Almut, Haraldsd��ttir, Hulda S., Wachowiak, Jacek, Keating, Sarah M., Vlasov, Vanja, Magnusd��ttir, Stefania, Ng, Chiam Yu, Preciat, German, ��agare, Alise, Chan, Siu H. J., Aurich, Maike K., Clancy, Catherine M., Modamio, Jennifer, Sauls, John T., Noronha, Alberto, Bordbar, Aarash, Cousins, Benjamin, Assal, Diana C. El, Valcarcel, Luis V., Apaolaza, I��igo, Ghaderi, Susan, Ahookhosh, Masoud, Guebila, Marouen Ben, Kostromins, Andrejs, Sompairac, Nicolas, Le, Hoai M., Ma, Ding, Sun, Yuekai, Wang, Lin, Yurkovich, James T., Oliveira, Miguel A. P., Vuong, Phan T., Assal, Lemmer P. El, Kuperstein, Inna, Zinovyev, Andrei, Hinton, H. Scott, Bryant, William A., Artacho, Francisco J. Arag��n, Planes, Francisco J., Stalidzans, Egils, Maass, Alejandro, Vempala, Santosh, Hucka, Michael, Saunders, Michael A., Maranas, Costas D., Lewis, Nathan E., Sauter, Thomas, Palsson, Bernhard ��., Thiele, Ines, and Fleming, Ronan M. T.
- Subjects
q-bio.QM ,FOS: Biological sciences ,Quantitative Biology - Quantitative Methods ,Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM) - Abstract
COnstraint-Based Reconstruction and Analysis (COBRA) provides a molecular mechanistic framework for integrative analysis of experimental data and quantitative prediction of physicochemically and biochemically feasible phenotypic states. The COBRA Toolbox is a comprehensive software suite of interoperable COBRA methods. It has found widespread applications in biology, biomedicine, and biotechnology because its functions can be flexibly combined to implement tailored COBRA protocols for any biochemical network. Version 3.0 includes new methods for quality controlled reconstruction, modelling, topological analysis, strain and experimental design, network visualisation as well as network integration of chemoinformatic, metabolomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and thermochemical data. New multi-lingual code integration also enables an expansion in COBRA application scope via high-precision, high-performance, and nonlinear numerical optimisation solvers for multi-scale, multi-cellular and reaction kinetic modelling, respectively. This protocol can be adapted for the generation and analysis of a constraint-based model in a wide variety of molecular systems biology scenarios. This protocol is an update to the COBRA Toolbox 1.0 and 2.0. The COBRA Toolbox 3.0 provides an unparalleled depth of constraint-based reconstruction and analysis methods.
- Published
- 2017
44. JSBML: a flexible and entirely Java-based library for working with SBML
- Author
-
Jouraku, Akiya, Le Novère, Nicolas, Zell, Andreas, Hucka, Michael, Rodriguez, Nicolas, Dumousseau, Marine, Dräger, Andreas, Wrzodek, Clemens, Dörr, Alexander, and Keating, Sarah
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. JSBML: a flexible and entirely Java-based library for working with SBML
- Author
-
Fröhlich, Sebastian, Le Novère, Nicolas, Zell, Andreas, Hucka, Michael, Dräger, Andreas, Rodriguez, Nicolas, Dumousseau, Marine, Dörr, Alexander, Wrzodek, Clemens, and Keller, Roland
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. General updates about SBML and SBML Team activities
- Author
-
Hucka, Michael
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. SBML Level 3 Package Proposal: Annotation
- Author
-
Hucka, Michael, Laibe, Camille, Juty, Nick, Liebermeister, Wolfram, Keating, Sarah, Lloyd, Catherine, Knuepfer, Christian, Misirli, Goksel, Schulz, Marvin, Waltemath, Dagmar, Taschuk, Morgan, Swainston, Neil, Le Novère, Nicolas, Lister, Allyson, Bergmann, Frank, Henkel, Ron, Krause, Falko, and Hoops, Stefan
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. SBML Level 3 Hierarchical Model Composition
- Author
-
Smith, Lucian and Hucka, Michael
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. SBML Level 3 Brief Update
- Author
-
Hucka, Michael
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML): Language Specification for Level 3 Version 1 Core
- Author
-
Smith, Lucian, Wilkinson, Darren, Hucka, Michael, Bergmann, Frank, Hoops, Stefan, Keating, Sarah, Sahle, Sven, and Schaff, James
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.