Search

Both silicone gel and quercetin are effective in scar treatment but have different action mechanisms. Quercetin is mainly applied in the gel form and can lead to poor adhesion of silicone gel sheet; therefore, they cannot be combined in clinical use. In this study, a silicone gel sheet that releases quercetin in a sustained manner for 48 hours was successfully developed. Four round scars (Ø: 1 cm) were made in the ears of New Zealand albino rabbits (n = 10). After scar healing, the rabbits were divided into four groups: blank control group with no treatment, silicone gel sheet group with dressing change every 2 days, quercetin group with dressing change three times daily, and combination treatment group with dressing change every 2 days. Scar assessment was performed 3 months later. Transepidermal water loss showed no difference between the combination treatment group and the silicone gel sheet group, but was lower than that in the quercetin group and the blank control group. Immunohistochemistry of CD 31 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen showed the following results: combination treatment group < silicone gel sheet group = quercetin group < blank control group. Polymerase chain reaction results showed that the expression of type-I and type-III collagen in the combination treatment group and the quercetin group was significantly lower than that in the other two groups. Thus, quercetin-modified silicone gel sheet combines the advantages of the two treatments and is more effective at inhibiting cell proliferation in scar tissue than either of the two treatments alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current wound scaffold dressing constructs can facilitate wound healing but do not exhibit antibacterial activity, resulting in high infection rates. We aimed to endow wound scaffold dressing with anti‐infective ability by polyhexamethylenebiguanide (PHMB). We prepared PHMB hydrogel at varying concentrations (0.25%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%) and assessed release and cytotoxicity. PHMB hydrogel was added to the wound scaffold dressing to generate a PHMB hydrogel‐modified wound scaffold dressing. Wound healing and infection prevention were evaluated using a full‐thickness skin defect model in rats. In vitro, the hydrogel PHMB release time positively correlated with PHMB concentration, with 1% allowing sufficiently long release time to encompass the high‐incidence period (3‐5 days) of infection following wound scaffold dressing implantation. Implantation of 1% PHMB hydrogel into the skin did not cause adverse responses. in vitro cytotoxicity assays showed the PHMB hydrogel‐modified wound scaffold dressing did not significantly affect proliferation of fibroblasts or vascular endothelial cells, 99.90% vs 99.84% for fibroblasts and 100.21% vs 99.28% for vascular endothelial cells at 21 days. Transplantation of PHMB hydrogel‐modified wound scaffold dressing/unmodified wound scaffold dressing on the non‐infected wounds of rats yielded no significant difference in relative vascularization rate, 47.40 vs 50.87 per view at 21 days, whereas bacterial content of the wound tissue in the PHMB hydrogel‐modified wound scaffold dressing group was significantly lower than the unmodified wound scaffold dressing group, (1.80 ± 0.35) × 103 vs (9.34 ± 0.45) × 103 at 14 days. Prevalence of persistent wound infection in the rats receiving PHMB hydrogel‐modified wound scaffold dressing transplantation onto infected wounds was significantly lower than the unmodified wound scaffold dressing group, 30% vs 100%. PHMB hydrogel‐modified wound scaffold dressing exhibited suitable antibacterial ability, and its biological activity did not significantly differ from that of the unmodified wound scaffold dressing, thereby allowing it to effectively prevent infection following wound scaffold dressing implantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to evaluate burn-related variations of inflammation and immunity. Fifty-five mice were divided randomly into sham burn and burn groups. Eighty-seven hospitalized burn patients were also reviewed. In mice, neutrophils and monocytes were elevated significantly on post burn day (PBD 1). Lymphocytes were reduced on PBDs 1 and 3. Levels of serum tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 were highest on PBD 1. Interleukin-1β levels were the highest on PBD 3. On PBD 3, CD4CD25T regulatory cells/CD4 cells in spleen were higher. On PBDs 1, 3, 7, and 14, percentage of splenic dendritic cells were significantly lower than the sham burn group. In patients, neutrophils and monocytes were significantly elevated on PBD 1. Levels declined but remained elevated at most days to PBD 7. Lymphocytes in burn groups 1 and 2 were reduced on PBDs 1 and 3, respectively. Our results exhibited that severe burn injury initiated a hyperinflammatory response and immunosuppression. PBDs 1 to 3 were important for changes in inflammation and immunosuppression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Patients and Methods Results Conclusion This study aims to investigate the role of recombinant human type III collagen (RHC3) in preventing abdominal adhesion.The amino acid sequence was analysed to determine the content of GPP fragments. RHC3 was co‐cultured with macrophages, and the phenotypic classification of macrophages was based on immunofluorescence detection of inducible nitric oxide synthase for M1 macrophages and arginase 1 for M2 macrophages. This approach was used to assess the impact of RHC3 on promoting M2 polarisation. Levels of inflammatory factor levels, including interleukin 1‐beta (IL‐1β), tumour necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α), and IL‐10, were quantified using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay to evaluate the improvement in inflammatory response. The capability of RHC3 to prevent abdominal adhesions was assessed by rinsing the abdominal cavity in an animal model.RHC3 contains GPP fragments that account for over 5% of its amino acid sequence. Cell studies indicated that RHC3 induced M2 polarisation in macrophages, significantly reduced levels of pro‐inflammatory factors (IL‐1β and TNF‐α), and significantly increased levels of the anti‐inflammatory factor IL‐10. Similarly, animal studies demonstrated a significant reduction in abdominal adhesion scores.These results suggest that RHC3 exhibits notable inflammation‐ameliorating activity and effectively prevents abdominal adhesions when used as a lavage solution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]