Search

Children with congenital or acquired heart disease can be exposed to relatively high lifetime cumulative doses of ionizing radiation from necessary medical imaging procedures including radiography, fluoroscopic procedures including diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterizations, electrophysiology examinations, cardiac computed tomography (CT) studies, and nuclear cardiology examinations. Despite the clinical necessity of these imaging studies, the related ionizing radiation exposure could pose an increased lifetime attributable cancer risk. The Image Gently "Have-A-Heart" campaign is promoting the appropriate use of medical imaging studies in children with congenital or acquired heart disease while minimizing radiation exposure. The focus of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive review of radiation dose management and CT performance in children with congenital or acquired heart disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is a need for consensus recommendations for ionizing radiation dose optimization during multimodality medical imaging in children with congenital and acquired heart disease (CAHD). These children often have complex diseases and may be exposed to a relatively high cumulative burden of ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures, including cardiac computed tomography, nuclear cardiology studies, and fluoroscopically guided diagnostic and interventional catheterization and electrophysiology procedures. Although these imaging procedures are all essential to the care of children with CAHD and have contributed to meaningfully improved outcomes in these patients, exposure to ionizing radiation is associated with potential risks, including an increased lifetime attributable risk of cancer. The goal of these recommendations is to encourage informed imaging to achieve appropriate study quality at the lowest achievable dose. Other strategies to improve care include a patient-centered approach to imaging, emphasizing education and informed decision making and programmatic approaches to ensure appropriate dose monitoring. Looking ahead, there is a need for standardization of dose metrics across imaging modalities, so as to encourage comparative effectiveness studies across the spectrum of CAHD in children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess, in a general cardiology cohort screened for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), the effectiveness and frequency with which multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography unexpectedly imaged and identified other nonatherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Background: MDCT angiography is a novel imaging strategy employed primarily to diagnose CAD that, in the course of these studies, can also potentially identify other important but previously unrecognized cardiovascular abnormalities. Methods: Consecutive 64-slice MDCT angiography studies were obtained in 4,543 patients with suspected atherosclerotic CAD at the Minneapolis Heart Institute, over a 29-month period (2005 to 2007). Results: Nonatherosclerotic-related cardiovascular abnormalities judged to be of potential clinical relevance were identified in 201 patients (4.4%). In 50 of these patients (1.1% of 4,543) the abnormality was previously unrecognized despite other imaging studies performed in 40%. Most common among the 50 patients were: congenital coronary artery anomalies (38%; largely right coronary artery from the left aortic sinus); ascending aortic aneurysms ≥45 mm (22%); hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with apical left ventricular (LV) wall thickening (14%); valvular heart diseases (8%), congenital heart diseases, including ventricular septal defect (6%); pulmonary embolus (6%); as well as LV noncompaction, left atrial myxoma, and LV apical aneurysm (2% each). As a consequence of MDCT angiography findings, new management strategies were instituted in 15 of 50 patients (30%), including surgical correction of coronary artery anomalies of wrong sinus origin, ascending aneurysm graft repair, thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism, and myxoma resection. Conclusions: Approximately 1% of patients undergoing MDCT angiography for suspicion of CAD proved to have otherwise unsuspected, but clinically relevant, cardiovascular abnormalities unrelated to coronary atherosclerosis. Almost one-third of these patients had cardiovascular diseases with major clinical implications for subsequent therapy. These findings underscore the value of MDCT angiography and the importance of careful assessment of scans for the recognition of a variety of cardiovascular abnormalities. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement has emerged as an alternative to operation for some patients with congenital heart disease requiring intervention. Endocarditis is increasingly described as an adverse event during follow-up [1–4] . Diagnosis is difficult because of the poor visualization of the prosthetic valve in the pulmonary position by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiogram and by the metallic artifact that degrades the image quality of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Two cases of percutaneous pulmonary valve obstruction diagnosed by cardiac computed tomographic angiography are presented. These cases demonstrate the utility of cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive imaging of suspected thrombus or endocarditis in a percutaneously placed pulmonary valve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This consensus document for the performance of cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT) to guide intervention in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) was developed collaboratively by pediatric and adult interventionalists, surgeons, and cardiac imagers with expertise specific to this patient subset. The document summarizes definitions of RVOT dysfunction as assessed by multimodality imaging techniques and reviews existing consensus statements and guideline documents pertaining to indications for intervention. In the context of this background information, recommendations for CCT scan acquisition and a standardized approach for reporting prior to surgical or transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement are proposed and presented. It is the first Imaging for Intervention collaboration for CHD patients and encompasses imaging and reporting recommendations prior to both surgical and percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Patients with single ventricle (SV) congenital heart disease (CHD) undergo several interventions in the first years of life. Advanced diagnostics are required for interstage assessment of anatomy, but are associated with significant diagnostic risk. We sought to evaluate image quality, risk, and accuracy of cardiac computed tomography (CCT) for evaluation of anatomy prior to superior cavopulmonary connection (SCPC) compared to surgical findings across 2 institutions., Methods: A retrospective evaluation of image quality, risk, and accuracy of pre-SCPC CCT was performed at 2 institutions between January 1, 2010 and September 30, 2016., Results: CCT was performed in 90 SV CHD patients with a median age of 4.03 months (interquartile range [IQR] 3.36, 5.33) prior to SCPC. Image quality was optimal (84%) or good (16%) in all patients, without significant discrepancy compared to surgical findings. 7 patients (8%) required interventional cardiac catheterization subsequent to CCT and before surgical intervention. 49% of scans were performed without sedation, 43% of scans were performed with mild to moderate sedation, and 8% of scans were performed with general anesthesia. The median total procedural dose-length product (DLP) was 18 (IQR 14, 26) mGy*cm, estimating an age adjusted radiation dose of 1.4 millisievert (mSv). One minor (1%) adverse event was reported within 24 h of the CCT. Surgical complications were unrelated to the presurgical findings., Conclusions: CCT for pre-SCPC evaluation is safe, with excellent accuracy for anatomy at the time of surgical intervention across 2 institutions. In select patients, noninvasive evaluation with CCT may be indicated.

Background: Image quality and radiation dose are optimized with a slow, steady heart rate (HR) when imaging the coronary arteries during cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA). The safety, efficacy, and protocol for HR reduction with beta blocker medication is not well described in a pediatric patient population., Objective: Provide a safe and efficient metoprolol dose protocol to be used in pediatric outpatients undergoing CCTA., Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all pediatric outpatients who received metoprolol during CCTA. Demographic and clinical characteristics were summarized and the average reduction in HR was estimated using a multivariate linear regression model. Images were evaluated on a 1-4 scale (1= optimal)., Results: Seventy-eight pediatric outpatients underwent a CCTA scan with the use of metoprolol. The median age was 13 years, median weight of 46 kg, and 36 (46%) were male. The median doses of metoprolol were 1.5 (IQR 1.1, 1.8) mg/kg and 0.4 (IQR 0.2, 0.7) mg/kg for oral and intravenous administrations, respectively. Procedural dose-length product was 57 (IQR 30, 119) mGy*cm. The average reduction in HR was 19 (IQR 12, 26) beats per minute, or 23%. No complications or adverse events were reported., Conclusion: Use of metoprolol in a pediatric outpatient setting for HR reduction prior to CCTA is safe and effective. A metoprolol dose protocol can be reproduced when a slower HR is needed, ensuring faster acquisition times, clear images, and associated reduction in radiation exposure in this population. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021; 116(1):100-105).

The American College of Cardiology (ACC) collaborated with the American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, Heart Rhythm Society, International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Pediatric Echocardiography to develop Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for multimodality imaging during the follow-up care of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). This is the first AUC to address cardiac imaging in adult and pediatric patients with established CHD. A number of common patient scenarios (also termed "indications") and associated assumptions and definitions were developed using guidelines, clinical trial data, and expert opinion in the field of CHD. 1 The indications relate primarily to evaluation before and after cardiac surgery or catheter-based intervention, and they address routine surveillance as well as evaluation of new-onset signs or symptoms. The writing group developed 324 clinical indications, which they separated into 19 tables according to the type of cardiac lesion. Noninvasive cardiac imaging modalities that could potentially be used for these indications were incorporated into the tables, resulting in a total of 1,035 unique scenarios. These scenarios were presented to a separate, independent panel for rating, with each being scored on a scale of 1 to 9, with 1 to 3 categorized as "Rarely Appropriate," 4 to 6 as "May Be Appropriate," and 7 to 9 as "Appropriate." Forty-four percent of the scenarios were rated as Appropriate, 39% as May Be Appropriate, and 17% as Rarely Appropriate. This AUC document will provide guidance to clinicians in the care of patients with established CHD by identifying the reasonable imaging modality options available for evaluation and surveillance of such patients. It will also serve as an educational and quality improvement tool to identify patterns of care and reduce the number of Rarely Appropriate tests in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2020 The American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess the accuracy and risk of substituting cardiac computed tomography for cardiac catheterization in select patients for evaluation of anatomy before second-stage single ventricle palliation., Methods: This is a retrospective review of consecutive diagnostic cardiac catheterization (n=16) and computed tomography studies (n=16) performed before second-stage single ventricle palliation from March 2010 to July 2012 at a single institution. Risk (anesthesia, vascular access, contrast, and radiation exposure), accuracy, and postoperative course were compared. Nonparametric analysis was used to compare differences in group medians., Results: General anesthesia was used for 16 of 16 cardiac catheterization studies and 1 of 16 computed tomography studies. Vascular access was central venous and/or arterial for all cardiac catheterization studies and a peripheral intravenous line for all computed tomography studies. Median age- and size-adjusted radiation dose was 14.0 mSv for cardiac catheterization and 1.1 mSv for computed tomography. Contrast dose was 4.8 mL/kg for the cardiac catheterization group and 2 mL/kg for the computed tomography group. There were no computed tomography discrepancies and 1 discrepancy between cardiac catheterization and surgical findings. There were 8 adverse events in 6 patients in the cardiac catheterization group and 1 adverse event in the computed tomography group. There was no difference between groups in postoperative course or need for repeat intervention., Conclusions: Cardiac computed tomography and cardiac catheterization are equally accurate for evaluation of anatomy before second-stage single ventricle palliation when compared with surgical findings. Computed tomography may be the preferred test in select patients because of decreased vascular access and anesthesia risk, lower radiation and contrast exposure, and fewer adverse events., (Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)