Search

A blood test identifying patients at increased risk of pulmonary hypertension (PH) could streamline the investigative pathway. The prospective, multicenter CIPHER study aimed to develop a microRNA‐based signature for detecting PH in breathless patients and enrolled adults with a high suspicion of PH who had undergone right heart catheterization (RHC). The CIPHER‐MRI study was added to assess the performance of this CIPHER signature in a population with low probability of having PH who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) instead of RHC. The microRNA signature was developed using a penalized linear regression (LASSO) model. Data were modeled both with and without N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP). Signature performance was assessed against predefined thresholds (lower 98.7% CI bound of ≥0.73 for sensitivity and ≥0.53 for specificity, based on a meta‐analysis of echocardiographic data), using RHC as the true diagnosis. Overall, 926 CIPHER participants were screened and 888 were included in the analysis. Of 688 RHC‐confirmed PH cases, approximately 40% were already receiving PH treatment. Fifty microRNA (from 311 investigated) were algorithmically selected to be included in the signature. Sensitivity [97.5% CI] of the signature was 0.85 [0.80–0.89] for microRNA‐alone and 0.90 [0.86–0.93] for microRNA+NT‐proBNP, and the corresponding specificities were 0.33 [0.24–0.44] and 0.28 [0.20–0.39]. Of 80 CIPHER‐MRI participants with evaluable data, 7 were considered PH‐positive by cMRI whereas 52 were considered PH‐positive by the microRNA signature. Due to low specificity, the CIPHER miRNA‐based signature for PH (either with or without NT‐proBNP in model) did not meet the prespecified diagnostic threshold for the primary analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A placebo-controlled randomized study is conducted to examine the effectiveness of the human anti-interleukin-1beta monoclonal antibody canakinumab in the treatment of the cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS), an inflammatory disease associated with excess production of interleukin-1. Results suggest that canakinumab is rapidly and significantly effective over a long period in treating patients with CAPS.

Abstract Background Canakinumab is a fully human anti-interleukin IL-1beta monoclonal antibody, being investigated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This multicenter, phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-finding study investigated the efficacy and safety of canakinumab in patients with active RA despite ongoing therapy at stable doses of methotrexate. Methods Patients were randomized to receive one of four regimens, in addition to methotrexate, for 12 weeks: canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneously (SC) every 4 weeks (q4wk), canakinumab 300 mg SC (2 injections of 150 mg SC) every 2 weeks, a 600 mg intravenous loading dose of canakinumab followed by 300 mg SC every 2 weeks', or placebo SC every 2 weeks. Results Among 274 patients with evaluable efficacy data, the percentage of responders according to American College of Rheumatology 50 criteria (the primary endpoint, based on a 28-joint count) was significantly higher with canakinumab 150 mg SC q4wk than with placebo (26.5% vs. 11.4%, respectively; p = 0.028). Compared to placebo, this dosage of canakinumab was also associated with significantly more favorable responses at week 12 with respect to secondary endpoints including the Disease Activity Score 28, scores on the Health Assessment Questionnaire and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, swollen 28-joint count, and patient's and physician's global assessments of disease activity. No safety concerns were raised with canakinumab therapy, particularly with regard to infections. Few injection-site reactions occurred. Conclusion The addition of canakinumab 150 mg SC q4wk improves therapeutic responses among patients who have active RA despite stable treatment with methotrexate. Trial Registration (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00784628)

The 52-week Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET) investigated the gastrointestinal and cardiovascular safety profile of lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily compared with 2 traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): ibuprofen 800 mg 3 times daily and naproxen 500 mg twice daily. Data from TARGET were analyzed to examine the effect of lumiracoxib compared with ibuprofen and naproxen on blood pressure (BP), incidence of de novo and aggravated hypertension, prespecified edema events, and congestive heart failure. Lumiracoxib resulted in smaller changes in BP as early as week 4. Least-squares mean change from baseline at week 4 for systolic BP was +0.57 mm Hg with lumiracoxib compared with +3.14 mm Hg with ibuprofen (P <.0001) and +0.43 with lumiracoxib compared with +1.80 mm Hg with naproxen (P <.0001). In conclusion, the use of lumiracoxib and traditional NSAIDs results in differing BP changes; these might be of clinical relevance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are established as treatment for managing pain associated with primary dysmenorrhea. However, the efficacy and tolerability of lumiracoxib 200 mg once daily (q.d.) has not previously been examined in primary dysmenorrhea. Methods: Two randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover studies of similar design have assessed the efficacy and tolerability of two regimens of lumiracoxib compared with placebo (Study 1) or naproxen and placebo (Study 2) in women (aged 18–45 years) with moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhea. In Study 1 ( n = 132), patients received lumiracoxib 200 mg q.d., lumiracoxib 200 mg with a 200 mg redose (p.r.n.) on day 1, or placebo. In Study 2 ( n = 144), patients received lumiracoxib 200 mg q.d., lumiracoxib 200 mg with a 200 mg redose p.r.n. on day 1, naproxen 500 mg twice daily (b.i.d.), or placebo. Patients recorded study medication use, efficacy assessments, and rescue medication use. Results: The primary efficacy variable, summed (time-weighted) pain intensity difference (categorical scale) over the first 8 hours (SPID-8), was similar between all active treatments (e.g., p = 0.939 for naproxen 500 mg b.i.d. vs. lumiracoxib 200 mg q.d. in Study 2), and all active treatments were superior to placebo ( p < 0.001). Median time-to-onset of analgesia was similar between lumiracoxib 200 mg q.d. and naproxen 500 mg b.i.d. Similar trends were observed for all other secondary efficacy variables. All treatments were well tolerated. Conclusions: Short-term administration of lumiracoxib 200 mg q.d. is effective and well tolerated and provides an alternative treatment option for the management of moderate to severe pain associated with primary dysmenorrhea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Canakinumab is a fully human anti-interleukin IL-1beta monoclonal antibody, being investigated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This multicenter, phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-finding study investigated the efficacy and safety of canakinumab in patients with active RA despite ongoing therapy at stable doses of methotrexate.Methods: Patients were randomized to receive one of four regimens, in addition to methotrexate, for 12 weeks: canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneously (SC) every 4 weeks (q4wk), canakinumab 300 mg SC (2 injections of 150 mg SC) every 2 weeks, a 600 mg intravenous loading dose of canakinumab followed by 300 mg SC every 2 weeks', or placebo SC every 2 weeks.Results: Among 274 patients with evaluable efficacy data, the percentage of responders according to American College of Rheumatology 50 criteria (the primary endpoint, based on a 28-joint count) was significantly higher with canakinumab 150 mg SC q4wk than with placebo (26.5% vs. 11.4%, respectively; p = 0.028). Compared to placebo, this dosage of canakinumab was also associated with significantly more favorable responses at week 12 with respect to secondary endpoints including the Disease Activity Score 28, scores on the Health Assessment Questionnaire and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, swollen 28-joint count, and patient's and physician's global assessments of disease activity. No safety concerns were raised with canakinumab therapy, particularly with regard to infections. Few injection-site reactions occurred.Conclusion: The addition of canakinumab 150 mg SC q4wk improves therapeutic responses among patients who have active RA despite stable treatment with methotrexate.Trial Registration: (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00784628). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Overview of three dose-response studies demonstrating the efficacy of lumiracoxib, a novel COX-2 selective inhibitor, for chronic pain associated with osteoarthritis (0A), or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and acute pain following dental extraction., Methods: OA and RA: 4-week, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled studies of similar design. Patients (OA, n = 583; RA, n = 571) received lumiracoxib 50 mg, 100 mg or 200 mg twice daily (bid), lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily (od), diclofenac 75 mg bid or placebo. Dental: 12-h, single-center, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled study. Patients (n = 202) received single oral doses of lumiracoxib 100 mg or 400 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg or placebo., Main Outcome Measures: OA: pain intensity (PI) in the target joint (visual analogue scale [VAS]) and WOMAC score at Week 4; RA: overall PI (VAS) and ACR20 response at Week 4; Dental: difference (PID, categorical and VAS) score over 12h post dose, time to onset of analgesia., Results: Throughout the OA study, all lumiracoxib doses provided superior reductions in PI versus placebo and at Week 4, all lumiracoxib doses provided efficacy similar to each other and to diclofenac. In the RA study, lumiracoxib 100 mg bid, 200 mg bid and 400mg od were significantly better than placebo in PI at Weeks 1 and 2 (all p < 0.05) but demonstrated borderline significance at Week 4 (lumiracoxib 400 mg od, p = 0.06). In pain following dental surgery, PID scores for both lumiracoxib doses were superior to placebo from 1.5 h onwards and always comparable, or superior, to ibuprofen. Lumiracoxib 400 mg had the fastest onset of analgesia, measured as median time to confirmed first perceptible pain relief using the two-stopwatch method (37.4 min, superiority versus placebo, p < 0.001). Lumiracoxib was well tolerated in all studies., Conclusions: These studies provide initial evidence that lumiracoxib is an effective, well-tolerated agent for the treatment of chronic and acute pain.

Objective: To compare the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) treated with therapeutic doses of the novel COX-2 selective inhibitor, lumiracoxib (COX189, Prexige), and the standard nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) ibuprofen. The COX-2 selective inhibitor celecoxib was included as an active control., Methods: In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study, eligible patients were randomized to receive lumiracoxib 200 mg (n = 264) or 400 mg (n = 260) once daily (qd), ibuprofen 800 mg (n = 260) 3 times daily (tid), or celecoxib 200 mg qd (n = 258) for 13 weeks. The incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers and erosions was determined by endoscopy prior to randomization, and after 4 weeks and 13 weeks of treatment (end of study). Frequencies of adverse events were also recorded., Results: The cumulative incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers >/= 3 mm in diameter was significantly lower in the lumiracoxib groups (200 mg: 4.3%; 400 mg: 4.0%) than in the ibuprofen group (15.7%; p < 0.001) and similar to the celecoxib group (3.2%). In the ibuprofen group, a significantly greater number of patients (6.0%) had > 10 gastroduodenal erosions compared with lumiracoxib 200 mg (1.2%; p < 0.01), lumiracoxib 400 mg (1.6%; p < 0.05), and celecoxib (2.4%; p < 0.05). A greater number of patients in the ibuprofen group discontinued treatment due to an adverse event compared with both lumiracoxib groups and the celecoxib group., Conclusion: In patients with OA, lumiracoxib 200 mg or 400 mg qd was associated with a significantly lower risk of gastroduodenal ulceration than ibuprofen 800 mg tid, and was similar to celecoxib 200 mg qd.