Search

Background: Bidirectional crosstalk between HER2 and estrogen receptor (ER) pathways may influence outcomes and the efficacy of endocrine therapy (ET). Low HER2 expression levels (HER2-low) have emerged as a predictive biomarker in patients with breast cancer (BC)., Methods: PALLAS is an open, international, phase 3 study evaluating the addition of palbociclib for 2 years to adjuvant ET in patients with stage II-III ER-positive/HER2-negative BC. To assess the impact of HER2 expression on patient outcomes in the phase III PALLAS trial, we analyzed (1) the association between rate of HER2-low with demographic and clinicopathological parameters, (2) the prognostic value of HER2-low status on invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS) and (3) HER2 expression's value as a predictive biomarker of response to palbociclib. HER2-low was defined as HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1 + or IHC 2 + with negative in situ hybridization (ISH). All pathologic evaluation was performed locally. Prognostic and predictive power of HER2 were assessed with Cox models., Results: From the original PALLAS intention-to-treat population (N = 5753), 5304 patients (92.2%) were included in this analysis. Among these, 2254 patients (42.5%) were classified as having HER2 IHC 0 (HER2-0), and 3050 (57.5%) as having HER2-low disease (1838 with IHC 1 + and 1212 with IHC 2 +). Median follow-up was 59.8 months. HER2-low prevalence varied significantly across 21 participating countries (range 16.7% to 75.6%; p < 0.001) and was more frequent in patients enrolled in North America (63.1%) than in Europe (53.4%) or other regions (53.4%) (p < 0.001). HER2 status was not significantly associated with iDFS in a multivariable Cox model (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.81 - 1.06). No significant interaction was observed between treatment arm and HER2 status for iDFS (p = 0.43). Similar results were obtained for DRFS and OS., Conclusions: In this large, prospective, global patient cohort, no differences were observed in clinical parameters, prognosis, or differential benefit from palbociclib between HER2-0 and HER2-low tumors. Significant geographic variability was observed in the prevalence of HER2-low status, suggesting a high degree of variation in pathologic assessment of HER2 expression without impact on outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Young women with breast cancer (BC) have an increased chance of carrying germline BRCA pathogenic variants (PVs). Limited data exist on the prognostic impact of tumor histology (i.e. ductal versus lobular) in hereditary breast cancer., Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included women aged ≤40 years with early-stage breast cancer diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2020 and known to carry germline PVs in BRCA1/2. Histology was locally assessed in each center. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to assess disease-free survival and overall survival., Results: Of 4628 patients included from 78 centers worldwide, 3969 (86%) had pure ductal, 135 (3%) pure lobular, and 524 (11%) other histologies. Compared with ductal tumors, lobular tumors were more often grade 1/2 (57.7% versus 22.1%), stage III (29.6% versus 18.5%), and luminal A-like (42.2% versus 12.2%). Lobular tumors were more often associated with BRCA2 PVs (71.1% BRCA2), while ductal tumors were more often associated with BRCA1 PVs (65.7% BRCA1). Patients with lobular tumors more often had mastectomy (68.9% versus 58.3%), and less often received chemotherapy (83.7% versus 92.9%). With a median follow-up of 7.8 years, no significant differences were observed in disease-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.37) or overall survival (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.62-1.50) between patients with ductal versus lobular tumors. No significant survival differences were observed according to specific BRCA gene, breast cancer subtype, or body mass index., Conclusions: In this large global cohort of young BRCA carriers with breast cancer, the incidence of pure lobular histology was low and associated with higher disease stage at diagnosis, luminal-like disease and BRCA2 PVs. Histology did not appear to impact prognosis., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The results of the SOLAR-1 and CAPItello-291, highlight the benefit of the ɑ-selective phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Pathway inhibitor (PI3Ki) alpelisib and the AKT inhibitor (AKTi) capivasertib in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)- negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) that have PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN tumour alterations. Although effective, these drugs are associated with significant toxicities, which often limit their use, particularly in frail patients. Following the recent incorporation of these agents into clinical practice, and with many others currently in development, significant challenges have emerged, particularly those regarding biomarkers for patient selection. This review will discuss biomarkers of response and their resistance to PI3K/AKT inhibitors (PI3K/AKTis) in HR+/HER- BC in early and advanced settings to ascertain which populations will most benefit from these drugs. Of the biomarkers that were analysed, such as PIK3CA, AKT, PTEN mutations, insulin levels, 18 F- FDG-PET/TC, only the PIK3CA-mutations (PIK3CA-mut) and the AKT pathway alterations seem to have a predictive value for treatments with alpelisib and capivasertib. However, due to the retrospective and exploratory nature of the study, the data did not provide conclusive results. In addition, the different methods used to detect PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations underline the fact that the optimal diagnostic companion has yet to be established. We have summarised the clinical data on the approved and discontinued agents targeting this pathway and have assessed the drugs development, successes, and failures. Finally, because of tumour heterogeneity, we emphasise the importance of reassessing the mutational status of PI3KCA in both metastatic tissue and blood at the time of disease progression to better tailor treatment for patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships, which may be considered as potential competing interests: GNM: meeting/travel grants from Roche, Bayer, and AstraZeneca (all outside the submitted work). EdA: Financial: Honoraria and/or advisory board from Roche/GNE, Novartis, SeaGen, Zodiac, Libbs, Pierre Fabre, Lilly, Astra-Zeneca, MSD, Gilead Sciences; Travel grants from Roche/GNE and Astra-Zeneca; Research grant to my institution from Roche/GNE, Astra-Zeneca, and GSK/Novartis, Gilead Sciences; Non-financial: ESMO director of Membership 2023–2024 and BSMO President 2023–2026. UdG: Advisory Board: MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Astellas, Sanofi, Bayer, Pfizer, Ipsen, Novartis, and PharmaMar. Institutional research grants: AstraZeneca, Sanofi, and Roche, (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The CLEOPATRA trial (NCT00567190) established a dual anti-HER2 blockade in combination with docetaxel as the first-line standard of care for patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. While this treatment is overall associated with significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), not all patients respond equally. We hypothesized that a radiological complete response (CR) at week 9 (i.e., first disease re-evaluation) is associated with prolonged OS and PFS compared to radiological partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD)., Methods: We performed an exploratory analysis of the CLEOPATRA study to address this question., Results: Out of 362 patients treated with docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab eligible for our analysis, 46 (12.7%) had radiological CR at week 9, 243 (67.1%) PR, and 73 (20.2%) SD per central RECIST v1.0. Radiological CR at first tumor re-evaluation was associated with a 60% risk reduction for death compared to SD (adjusted HR = 0.40 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23-0.70), whereas no significant impact on survival was observed for PR (adjusted HR = 0.85 95% CI 0.60-1.20). The same was observed for PFS with adjusted HR = 0.30 (95% CI 0.18-0.48) for the CR subgroup and adjusted HR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.60-1.09) for the PR subgroup. In multivariate analysis, no variables were associated with radiological CR., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that radiological CR at first disease re-evaluation is associated with more prolonged survival; this might result from stronger dependence on HER2 pathway addiction, supporting the need for further translational research., Competing Interests: Disclosure VD, MB, MC, FJ: none; EA: consultancy fee/honoraria from Eli Lilly, Sandoz, AstraZeneca. Research grant to my Institution from Gilead; Support to attend medical conferences (travel/accommodation/expenses) from Novartis, Roche, Eli Lilly, Genetic, IstitutoGentili, Daiichi Sankyo (all outside the submitted work); CM: honoraria from Novartis and Lilly; DMB: declares full-time employment from the European Society for Medical Oncology since September 1, 2023; speaker's engagement from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo; meeting/travel grant from Novartis; institutional research funding from Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Novartis; non-remunerated activity as a member of the board of directors for Associaҫão de Investigaҫão e Cuidados de Suporte em Oncologia; non-remunerated leadership role as prior Portuguese Young Oncologists; Committee Chair of Sociedade Portuguesa de Oncologia; GNM: support to attend medical conferences: Roche and Bayer (all outside the submitted work); ML: honoraria and/or advisory board from Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Seagen, MSD, Exact Sciences, Takeda, Ipsen, Sandoz, Libbsand Knight, a travel grant from Gilead and research support (to the Institution) from Gilead (all outside the submitted work); EdA: honoraria and/or advisory board from Roche/GNE, Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Zodiac, Libbsand Pierre Fabre. Travel grants from Roche/GNE and GSK/Novartis. Research grant to his institution from Roche/GNE, Astra-Zeneca, GSK/Novartis, and Servier(all outside the submitted work)., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) has advocated the establishment of guidelines to optimise precision radiotherapy (RT) in conjunction with contemporary therapeutics for cancer care. Quality assurance in RT (QART) plays a pivotal role in influencing treatment outcomes. Clinical trials incorporating QART protocols have demonstrated improved survival rates with minimal associated toxicity. Nonetheless, in routine clinical practice, there can be variability in the indications for RT, dosage, fractionation, and treatment planning, leading to uncertainty. In pivotal trials reporting outcomes of systemic therapy for breast cancer, there is limited information available regarding RT, and the potential interaction between modern systemic therapy and RT remains largely uncharted. This article is grounded in a consensus recommendation endorsed by ESTRO, formulated by international breast cancer experts. The consensus was reached through a modified Delphi process and was presented at an international meeting convened in Florence, Italy, in June 2023. These recommendations are regarded as both optimal and essential standards, with the latter aiming to define the minimum requirements. A template for a case report form (CRF) has been devised, which can be utilised by all clinical breast cancer trials involving RT. Optimal requirements include adherence to predefined RT planning protocols and centralised QART. Essential requirements aim to reduce variations and deviations from the guidelines in RT, even when RT is not the primary focus of the trial. These recommendations underscore the significance of implementing these practices in both clinical trials and daily clinical routines to generate high-quality data., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest IMe declares advisory boards supported by Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, SeaGen, Daiichi Sankyo, Astra Zeneca. CB declares honoraria supported by declares advisory boards supported by Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Amgen. ML received honoraria and/or participated in advisory board from Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, SeaGen, MSD, Exact Sciences, Takeda, Ipsen, Sandoz, Libbs & Knight, a travel grant from Gilead and research support to the Institution from Gilead. EdA disclosed honoraria and/or advisory board from Roche/GNE, Novartis, SeaGen, Zodiac, Libbs, Pierre Fabre, Lilly, AstraZeneca. JC disclosed consulting/advisor for Roche, Celgene, Cellestia, AstraZeneca, SeaGen, Daiichi Sankyo, Erytech, Athenex, Polyphor, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, GSK, Leuko, Bioasis, Clovis Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses, Hibercell, BioInvent, Gemoab, Gilead, Menarini, Zymeworks, Reveal Genomics, Expres2ion Biotechnologies. NH disclosed honoraria for lectures and/or consulting from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Sandoz, SeaGen. HSR disclosed institutional research support by Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo Inc., F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG/Genentech, Inc., Gilead Sciences Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck & Co. Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, OBI Pharma, Pfizer, Pionyr Immunotherapeutics, Sermonix Pharmaceuticals Inc., Taiho Oncology Inc., and Veru Inc. GC reports personal fees for consulting, advisory role and speakers’ bureau from Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, Foundation Medicine, Samsung and Daiichi Sankyo; honoraria from Ellipses Pharma and fees for travel and accommodations from Roche/Genentech and Pfizer. LV declares participation on advisory board from Daiichi Sankyo and Pfizer. ME declares advisory board supported by Pfizer and Novartis and lecture fees supported by AstraZeneca. GM declares consultancy honoraria from Roche, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Jensen, Lilly, and Sanofi. LDM declares consulting fees from Roche, Novartis, Eli Lilly, MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, SeaGen, Gilead, Eisai, Pierre Fabre, AstraZeneca, Stemline Menarini, Exact Sciences, Agendia, GSK, Pfizer. No other competing interests declared., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The results of several studies aiming to tailor early breast cancer treatment to individual risk were released in 2023. Axillary lymph node dissections and radiotherapy may be safely omitted in carefully selected patients. Sustained benefit from adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors was observed in high-risk hormone receptor-positive disease and the addition of immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved pathological response. Continued benefit from perioperative pembrolizumab was reported in patients with triple negative breast cancer, while atezolizumab did not improve the risk of recurrence either pre- or postoperatively. The chance of pregnancy was higher in younger patients attempting to conceive after breast cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Wolters-Kluwer-royalties (AHP); Novartis-research support (AHP). AstraZeneca - travel grants for meetings (GNM)., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Opinion Statement: Around 90% of breast tumours are diagnosed in the early stage, with approximately 70% being hormone receptor-positive. The cornerstone of adjuvant therapy for early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer is endocrine therapy, tailored according to disease stage, biological characteristics of the tumour, patient's comorbidities, preferences and age. In premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ovarian function suppression is a key component of the adjuvant endocrine treatment in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen. Moreover, it can be used during chemotherapy as a standard strategy for ovarian function preservation in all breast cancer subtypes. In the metastatic setting, ovarian function suppression should be used in all premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer to achieve a post-menopausal status. Despite its efficacy, ovarian function suppression may lead to several side effects that can have a major negative impact on patients' quality of life if not properly managed (e.g. hot flashes, depression, cognitive impairment, osteoporosis, sexual dysfunction, weight gain). A deep knowledge of the side effects of ovarian function suppression is necessary for clinicians. A correct counselling in this regard and proactive management should be considered a fundamental part of survivorship care to improve treatment adherence and patients' quality of life., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The incorporation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) into the management of operable breast cancer (BC) has been hampered by the heterogeneous results from different studies. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of ctDNA in patients with operable (non metastatic) BC., Materials and Methods: A systematic search of databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL) and conference proceedings was conducted to identify studies reporting the association of ctDNA detection with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with stage I-III BC. Log-hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled at each timepoint of ctDNA assessment (baseline, after neoadjuvant therapy, and follow-up). ctDNA assays were classified as primary tumor-informed and non tumor-informed., Results: Of the 3174 records identified, 57 studies including 5779 patients were eligible. In univariate analyses, ctDNA detection was associated with worse DFS at baseline [HR 2.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.92-4.63], after neoadjuvant therapy (HR 7.69, 95% CI 4.83-12.24), and during follow-up (HR 14.04, 95% CI 7.55-26.11). Similarly, ctDNA detection at all timepoints was associated with worse OS (at baseline: HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.60-4.77; after neoadjuvant therapy: HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.44-5.14; and during follow-up: HR 9.19, 95% CI 3.26-25.90). Similar DFS and OS results were observed in multivariate analyses. Pooled HRs were numerically higher when ctDNA was detected at the end of neoadjuvant therapy or during follow-up and for primary tumor-informed assays. ctDNA detection sensitivity and specificity for BC recurrence ranged from 0.31 to 1.0 and 0.7 to 1.0, respectively. The mean lead time from ctDNA detection to overt recurrence was 10.81 months (range 0-58.9 months)., Conclusions: ctDNA detection was associated with worse DFS and OS in patients with operable BC, particularly when detected after treatment and using primary tumor-informed assays. ctDNA detection has a high specificity for anticipating BC relapse., Competing Interests: Disclosure GNM reports meeting/travel grants from AstraZeneca. EA reports consultancy fees/honoraria from Eli Lilly, Sandoz, and AstraZeneca; research grant to the institution from Gilead; meeting/travel grants from Novartis, Roche, Eli Lilly, Genetic, Istituto Gentili, Daiichi Sankyo, and AstraZeneca (all outside the submitted work). DMB reports full time employment at European Society for Medical Oncology since September 1, 2023; speaker’s engagement from Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca; participation as medical research fellow in research studies with institutionally funded by Eli Lilly, Novartis, and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd to Institut Jules Bordet; non-financial interest as member of the board of directors for Associaҫão de Investigaҫão e Ciudados de Suporte em Oncologia; non-remunerated prior leadership role as Portuguese Young Oncologists Committee Chair from Sociedade Portuguesa de Oncologia (all outside the submitted work). ALC reports leadership role at Eisai, Celgene, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, and MSD; intellectual property for MEDSIR; a consulting role for Lilly, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Exact Sciences, Seagen, and GSK; to be part of the speaker bureau for Lilly, AstraZeneca, and MSD; to receive research funding from Pfizer, Roche, Foundation Medicine, Exact Sciences, Pierre-Fabre, and Agendia; and travel compensation from Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. JC reports consulting/advisor role for Roche, Celgene, Cellestia, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Erytech, Athenex, Polyphor, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, GSK, Leuko, Bioasis, Clovis Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses, HiberCell, BioInvent, GEMoaB, Gilead, Menarini, Zymeworks, Reveal Genomics, Expres2ion Biotechnologies, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and AbbVie; honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Celgene, Eisai, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca; research funding to the institution from Roche, Ariad pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Baxalta GMBH/Servier Affaires, Bayer healthcare, Eisai, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Guardant Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, PIQUR Therapeutics, IQVIA, and Queen Mary University of London; stocks from MAJ3 Capital and Leuko (relative); travel, accommodation, and other expenses covered by Roche, Novartis, Eisai, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Gilead, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; patents ‘Pharmaceutical Combinations of A Pi3k Inhibitor And A Microtubule Destabilizing Agent’—Javier Cortés Castán, Alejandro Piris Giménez, Violeta Serra Elizalde, WO 2014/199294 A (issued) and ‘Her2 as a predictor of response to dual HER2 blockade in the absence of cytotoxic therapy’—Aleix Prat, Antonio Llombart, Javier Cortés, US 2019/ 0338368 A1 (licensed). MI reports honoraria from Novartis and Seattle Genetics; research support to the institution from Natera Inc, Inivata, Roche, and Pfizer; and travel grants from Roche and Gilead. GP reports being part of the advisory board/speaker bureau for Roche, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Illumina, and ADS Biotech; and grants from Candriam and Thermo Fisher. EA reports honoraria and/or being part of the advisory board for Roche/GNE, Novartis, Seagen, Zodiac, Libbs, Pierre Fabre, Lilly, and Astra-Zeneca; travel grants from Roche/GNE and AstraZeneca; research grant to the institution from Roche/GNE, Astra-Zeneca, and GSK/Novartis. SDC reports being on the speaker’s bureau for AstraZeneca; and on the advisory board for Pierre-Fabre, IQVIA, and MEDSIR. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Currently three antibody-drug-conjugates (ADC) are approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for treatment of breast cancer (BC) patient: trastuzumab-emtansine, trastuzumab-deruxtecan and sacituzumab-govitecan. ADC are composed of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting a specific antigen, a cytotoxic payload and a linker. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) distinguish ADC from conventional chemotherapy and must be understood by clinicians., Areas Covered: Our review delineates the PK/PD profiles of ADC approved for the treatment of BC with insight for future development. This is an expert opinion literature review based on the EMA's Assessment Reports, enriched by a comprehensive literature search performed on Medline in August 2023., Expert Opinion: All three ADC distributions are described by a two-compartment structure: tissue and serum. Payload concentration peak is immediate but remains at low concentration. The distribution varied for all ADC only with body weight. mAb will be metabolised firstly by the saturable complex formation of ADC/Tumour-Receptor and secondly by binding of FcgRs in immune cells. They are all excreted in the bile and faeces with minimal urine elimination. Dose adjustments, apart from weight, are not recommended. Novel ADC are composed of cleavable linkers with various targets/payloads with the same PK/PD properties, but novel structures of ADC are in development.

Introduction: This study aimed to compare SBRT and cEBRT for treating spinal metastases through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)., Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched up to 6 May 2023 for RCTs comparing SBRT and cEBRT for spinal metastases. Overall and complete pain response, local progression, overall survival, quality of life and adverse events were extracted. Data were pooled using random-effects models. Results were reported as risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes, and hazard ratios (HRs) for time-to-event outcomes, along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I 2 statistic., Results: Three RCTs were identified involving 642 patients. No differences were seen in overall pain response comparing SBRT and cEBRT (RR at 3 months: 1.12, 95% CI, 0.74-1.70, p = 0.59; RR at 6 months: 1.29, 95% CI, 0.97-1.72, p = 0.08). Only two of three studies presented complete pain response data. SBRT demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in complete pain response compared to cEBRT (RR at 3 months: 2.52; 95% CI, 1.58-4.01; P < 0.0001; RR at 6 months: 2.48; 95% CI, 1.23-4.99; P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in local progression and overall survival. Adverse events were similar, except for any grade radiation dermatitis, which was significantly lower in SBRT arm (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.96, P = 0.04)., Conclusion: SBRT is a safe treatment option for spine metastases. It may provide better complete pain response compared to cEBRT. Additional trials are needed to determine the potential benefits of SBRT in specific patient subsets., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Neoadjuvant treatment discriminates responders, but pathologic complete response is uncommon in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of Ki-67 index after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET)., Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and conference proceedings up to 22nd August 2023 to identify studies reporting the association of Ki-67 index after NET with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and/or overall survival (OS) in women with ER-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer. We combined RFS and OS hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)., Results: Twelve studies including 7897 patients were analysed. Most studies were clinical trials (n = 7547) including only postmenopausal women (n = 3953) treated with aromatase inhibitor (n = 3359). Three studies evaluated Ki-67 in a preplanned core biopsy at 2-4 weeks of NET (n = 3348), while nine evaluated Ki-67 in the surgical specimen (n = 4549) after 2-24 weeks of NET. Median follow-up ranged between 37 and 95 months for RFS and 62-84 months for OS. High Ki-67 index after NET was significantly associated with worse RFS (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.86-3.30) and OS (HR 2.66, 95% CI 1.65-4.28). A sensitivity analysis including three studies that measured Ki-67 in a preplanned core biopsy showed similar association with RFS (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.77-3.30)., Conclusions: High Ki-67 after NET is associated with worse survival outcomes, even after a short course of NET, emphasising the prognostic value of this biomarker in women with ER-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Diogo Martins-Branco: Honoraria and advisory board fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Angelini, AstraZeneca, and Novartis, meeting/travel grants from LEO Farmacêuticos, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Ipsen, Janssen, Roche, Laboratórios Vitória, and Novartis, and institutional research grants from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Novartis (all outside the submitted work); Guilherme Nader-Marta: Support to attend medical conferences: Roche, AstraZeneca, and Bayer (all outside the submitted work); Chiara Molinelli: Honoraria and advisory board fees from Lilly and Novartis; travel grant by Gilead (all outside the submitted work); Michail Ignatiadis: Honoraria from Novartis, Seattle Genetics; travel grants from Amgen, Roche, Gilead; research grant to my institution Roche/GNE, Pfizer, Natera Inc, Inivata Inc (all outside the submitted work); Philippe Aftimos: Honoraria and advisory board fees from Eli Lilly, Gilead, Menarini, Novartis, and Roche; travel grant from Daiichi Sankyo; and research funding from Roche (all outside the submitted work); Roberto Salgado: Honoraria from BMS, Exact Sciences, and Roche; intellectual property rights/patent from Merk; and research funding from Roche, Merk, and Puma Biotechnology (all outside the submitted work); Evandro de Azambuja: Honoraria and/or advisory board from Roche/GNE, Novartis, SeaGen, Zodiac, Libbs; Pierre Fabre, Lilly, Astra-Zeneca, MSD, and Gilead. Travel grants from Roche/GNE and Astra-Zeneca. Research grant to my institution from Roche/GNE, Astra-Zeneca, GSK/Novartis, and Servier (all outside the submitted work). Lieveke Ameye and Marianne Paesmans have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: This review aims to explore the role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a biomarker for patient selection in breast cancer. We describe the current evidence and the main ongoing trials both in the early and metastatic setting., Recent Findings: In the metastatic setting, the analysis of ctDNA can identify specific genetic alterations amenable of molecularly targeted treatments. Several assays are now approved for the detection of genetic alterations in plasma cell-free DNA to guide treatment decision (e.g., PIK3CA mutations for PI3K inhibitors, and ESR1 mutations for the selective estrogen receptor degrader elacestrant). In the early setting, emerging evidence is demonstrating that ctDNA can identify a disease relapse with a lead-time of approximately 10 months before imaging. This could help select patients who may benefit from escalation treatment strategy, although this hypothesis needs to be first prospectively validated., Summary: Liquid biopsy for ctDNA detection represents an exciting new field in rapid evolution. Several trials are ongoing to validate the clinical utility of ctDNA in daily practice in the early setting and to expand its current indications in the metastatic one., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have become the standard of care for hormone receptor-positive (HR + ) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer, improving survival outcomes compared to endocrine therapy alone. Abemaciclib and ribociclib, in combination with endocrine therapy, have demonstrated significant benefits in invasive disease-free survival for high-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer patients. Each CDK4/6i-palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib-exhibits distinct toxicity profiles. Radiation therapy (RT) can be delivered with a palliative or ablative intent, particularly using stereotactic body radiation therapy for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. However, pivotal randomized trials lack information on concomitant CDK4/6i and RT, and existing preclinical and clinical data on the potential combined toxicities are limited and conflicting. As part of a broader effort to establish international consensus recommendations for integrating RT and targeted agents in breast cancer treatment, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety profile of combining CDK4/6i with palliative and ablative RT in both metastatic and early breast cancer settings., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) represents up to 15% of all breast carcinomas. While the proportion of women with overweight and obesity increases globally, the impact of body mass index (BMI) at primary diagnosis on clinicopathological features of ILC and the prognosis of the patients has not been investigated yet., Patients and Methods: We performed a multicentric retrospective study including patients diagnosed with non-metastatic pure ILC. The association of BMI at diagnosis with clinicopathological variables was assessed using linear or multinomial logistic regression. Univariable and multivariable survival analyses were performed to evaluate the association of BMI with disease-free survival (DFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: The data of 2856 patients with ILC and available BMI at diagnosis were collected, of which 2570/2856 (90.0%) had oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) not amplified/overexpressed (ER+/HER2-) ILC. Of these 2570 patients, 80 were underweight (3.1%), 1410 were lean (54.9%), 712 were overweight (27.7%), and 368 were obese (14.3%). Older age at diagnosis, a higher tumour grade, a larger tumour size, a nodal involvement, and multifocality were associated with a higher BMI. In univariable models, higher BMI was associated with worse outcomes for all end-points (DFS: hazard ratio (HR) 1.21, 95CI 1.12-1.31, p value<0.01; DRFS: HR 1.25, 95CI 1.12-1.40, p value<0.01; OS: HR 1.25, 95CI 1.13-1.37, p value<0.01). This association was not statistically significant in multivariable analyses (DFS: HR 1.09, 95CI 0.99-1.20, p value 0.08; DRFS: HR 1.03, 95CI 0.89-1.20, p value 0.67; OS: HR 1.11, 95CI 0.99-1.24, p value 0.08), whereas grade, tumour size, and nodal involvement were still prognostic for all end-points., Conclusion: Worse prognostic factors such as higher grade, larger tumour size, and nodal involvement are associated with higher BMI in ER+/HER2- ILC, while there was no statistical evidence for an independent prognostic role for BMI. Therefore, we hypothesise that the effect of BMI on survival could be mediated through its association with these clinicopathological variables., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low expression in breast cancer has been recently identified as a new therapeutic target. However, it is unclear if HER2-low status has an independent impact on prognosis., Materials and Methods: A systematic literature research was carried out to identify studies comparing survival outcomes of patients affected by HER2-low versus HER2-zero breast cancer. Using random-effects models, pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the metastatic setting as well as disease-free survival (DFS), OS and pathological complete response (pCR) in the early setting. Subgroup analyses by hormone receptor (HoR) status were carried out. The study protocol is registered on PROSPERO (n.CRD42023390777)., Results: Among 1916 identified records, 42 studies including 1 797 175 patients were eligible. In the early setting, HER2-low status was associated with significant improved DFS (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.92, P < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.95, P < 0.001) when compared to HER2-zero status. Improved OS was observed for both HoR-positive and HoR-negative HER2-low populations, while DFS improvement was observed only in the HoR-positive subgroup. HER2-low status was significantly associated with a lower rate of pCR as compared to HER2-zero status both in the overall population (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.88, P = 0.001) and in the HoR-positive subgroup (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.90, P = 0.001). In the metastatic setting, patients with HER2-low breast cancers showed better OS when compared with those with HER2-zero tumours in the overall population (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.98, P = 0.008), regardless of HoR status. No significant PFS differences were found., Conclusions: Compared with HER2-zero status, HER2-low status appears to be associated with a slightly increased OS both in the advanced and early settings, regardless of HoR expression. In the early setting, HER2-low tumours seem to be associated to lower pCR rates, especially if HoR-positive., Competing Interests: Disclosure CM reports support to attend medical conferences from Gilead and honoraria from Novartis and Lilly (all outside the submitted work). EA reports consultancy fees/honoraria from Eli Lilly, Sandoz, AstraZeneca, research grant to her institution from Gilead and support for attending medical conferences from Novartis, Roche, Eli Lilly, Genetic, Istituto Gentili, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca. GNM reports support to attend medical conferences from Roche and Bayer (all outside the submitted work). AP reports advisory and consulting fees from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Puma, Oncolytics Biotech, MSD, Guardant Health, Peptomyc and Lilly, lecture fees from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Nanostring Technologies and Daiichi Sankyo, institutional financial interests from Boehringer, Novartis, Roche, Nanostring, Sysmex Europe GmbH, Medica Scientia inno. Re-search, SL, Celgene, Astellas and Pfizer; and shares ownership and a leadership role in Reveal Genomics, SL. EB reports funding to her institution from Gilead Science. FS declares personal fees for educational activities from Novartis and Gilead and travel expenses from Gilead, Novartis and Daiichy Sankyo. GV received honoraria for advisory boards and consulting fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD Oncology and Pfizer. LDM reports institutional research grant from Eli Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo and Seagen, consulting fees from Eli Lilly; honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Seagen, Gilead, Pierre Fabre, Eisa, Exact Sciences and Ipsen and support for attending meetings from Roche, Pfizer and Eisai; and fees for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Novartis, Roche, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Exact Sciences, Gilead, Pierre Fabre, Eisai, AstraZeneca and Agendia. ML played an advisory role for Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Seagen, Gilead, MSD and Exact Sciences and received speaker honoraria from Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Libbs and Takeda and travel grants from Gilead outside the submitted work. EDA received honoraria and/or participated to advisory board from Roche/GNE, Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Zodiac, Libbs and Pierre Fabre; received travel grants from Roche/GNE and GSK/Novartis; and received research grant to his institution from Roche/GNE, AstraZeneca, GSK/Novartis and Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a class of antineoplastic agents whose structure is composed of three main components: a monoclonal antibody (mAB) targeting a specific target antigen, a cytotoxic payload, and a linker binding the antibody to the payload. By combining the specificity of mABs with the high potency of the payloads, ADCs constitute a smart drug delivery system with improved therapeutic index. After recognition and binding of the mAB to its target surface antigen, ADCs are internalized by endocytosis by the tumor cell, releasing the payloads into the cytoplasm, where they exert their cytotoxic activity, eventually leading to cell death. The composition of some of the new ADCs confers additional functional properties that allow expanding their activity to neighboring cells not expressing the target antigen, constituting a valuable strategy to overcome tumor heterogeneity. Some of these 'off-target effects', such as the bystander effect, are possibly the mechanism underlying the antitumor activity demonstrated in patients with low expression of the target antigens, which represents an important paradigm shift in anticancer targeted therapy. Three ADCs are currently approved for the treatment of breast cancer (BC); two anti-HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) ADCs (trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan); and one Trop-2-targeted ADC (sacituzumab govitecan). Based on the unprecedented efficacy data demonstrated by these agents, ADCs have been incorporated as part of standard regimens for all subtypes of advanced BC, as well as for high-risk early HER2-positive BC. Despite the remarkable advances, several hurdles still remain to overcome, including the development of reliable biomarkers for patient selection, prevention, and management of potentially severe toxicities, ADC resistance mechanisms, post-ADC resistance patterns, and optimal treatment sequencing and combinations. In this review, we will summarize the currently available evidence related to the use of these agents, as well as explore the current landscape of ADC development for BC treatment., (© The Author(s), 2023.)

Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the immune response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 prime-vaccination in patients with cancer., Methods: We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library until 28/09/2021, and conference proceedings from ASCO and ESMO 2021 annual meetings. We screened for observational or interventional studies including subjects ≥ 16 years old with cancer diagnosis who were vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Prime-vaccination was defined as one dose of Ad26.COV2-S vaccine or two doses of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1-S or inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The outcomes were humoral and adaptive immune responses (proportion of subjects with positive titers of antibody anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and anti-SARS-CoV-2 cellular responses, respectively)., Results: We included 89 records reporting data from 30,183 subjects. The overall seropositive rate within the first month after complete anti-SARS-CoV-2 prime-vaccination was 80% [95% confidence interval (CI), 72-86%], 60% (95%CI, 53-67%) in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) versus 94% (95%CI, 88-97%) in patients with solid malignancies (SM). The diagnosis of HM was significantly associated with a lower seropositive rate on multivariate meta-regression (odds ratio 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.69, HM versus both, p = 0.002). The overall humoral response was 49% (95% CI, 42-56%) after incomplete prime-vaccination and 79% (95% CI, 70-86%) at 2 months after complete prime-vaccination. These responses were also lower in patients with HM at these time points. The overall cellular response rate at any time after vaccination was 61% (95% CI, 44-76%)., Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides compelling evidence of humoral and adaptive immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with cancer, which last for at least 2 months following complete prime-vaccination., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma (CSCC) is among the most frequent malignancies worldwide. For those not amenable to treatment with curative intent, immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) with anti-programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) antibodies has emerged as a novel therapeutic option. In this study, the authors sought to investigate the activity of the anti-PD-1 agent nivolumab in patients with advanced CSCC (aCSCC)., Methods: CA209-9JC was an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and/or efficacy of nivolumab in systemic treatment-naive patients with aCSCC. Nivolumab (3 mg/kg) was administered every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or 12 months of treatment. The primary end point was the best objective response rate (BORR) as per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Secondary end points included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: Twenty-four patients with aCSCC were enrolled with a median age of 74 years (range, 48-93). Among the 24 patients evaluable for response, the BORR was 58.3% (14/24); there were no complete responses. With a median follow-up of 17.6 months, median duration of response has not been reached, and the estimated median PFS and OS were 12.7 and 20.7 months, respectively. Prior exposure to radiotherapy was associated with worse outcomes (p = .035, univariate analysis). Treatment-related adverse events of any grade and grade ≥ 3 occurred in 21 (87.5%) and six (25%) patients, respectively, and one patient discontinued nivolumab due to toxicities., Conclusions: Nivolumab resulted in robust antitumor activity, sustained responses, and good tolerability in systemic treatment-naive patients with aCSCC. These data provide further evidence to support the use of ICI as the standard treatment of aCSCC., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)

Background and Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women and radiation therapy (RT) is crucial in its multimodality management. Since bibliometrics is a powerful tool to reveal the scientific literature, we decided to perform a bibliometric analysis of the literature on breast cancer radiotherapy. We explored emerging trends and common patterns in research, tracking collaboration and networks, and foreseeing future directions in this clinical setting., Material and Methods: The electronic Scopus database was searched using the keywords "breast cancer" and "radiotherapy" to include manuscripts published in English, between 2000 and 2021. Data analysis was performed using R-Studio 0.98.1091 software with a machine-learning bibliometric method, based on the bibliometrix R package. The most relevant authors were quantified per number and fractionalized number of authored documents. Author productivity was analysed through Lotka's law. Bradford's law was applied to identify the nucleus of journals focused on the addressed topic. Mainstream themes area included isolated topics (niche themes), new topics (emerging themes), hot topics (motor themes) and essential topics (basic themes)., Results: A total of 27 184 documents was found, mainly original articles (76 %). The annual growth rate was 6.98 %, with an increase in scientific production from 485 to 2000 documents between 2000 and 2021. Overall, 2 544 journals published ≥ 1 documents. The most relevant authors were affiliated in the United States. Surgical procedures, cancer type and treatment strategies represented basic themes, while primary systemic therapy and sentinel lymph node biopsy were emerging themes. Health-related quality of life was a niche theme, while RT techniques had high centrality., Conclusion: The primary interests of breast cancer radiation oncologists have evolved over time, adding safety, health related quality of life, sustainability of treatments and combination to systemic therapies to radiotherapy efficacy and effectiveness and treatment outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: Special histological types (SHT) of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are a heterogeneous group of rare poorly understood diseases. We aimed to evaluate the clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of patients with SHT of TNBC., Methods: We evaluated patients with a SHT of TNBC treated in a cancer center between 2009 and 2020. The endpoints were characterization of clinical and pathological features, pathologic complete response (PCR) rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS)., Results: The 132 patients included had the following histologies: metaplastic (n=71), medullary pattern (n=14), lobular (n=12), adenoid cystic (n=12), apocrine (n=10), and others (n=13). Metaplastic, lobular, and medullary pattern tumors had higher grade (66.6-85.7% grade 3); adenoid cystic and apocrine had mainly grade 1-2 (70-83.3%). Metaplastic and lobular carcinomas had higher disease stages (47.8% and 58.2% stages III-IV). PCR rates were 10.3% for metaplastic and 33.3% for lobular carcinomas, with 5-year DFS rates of 56% and 51.4%. Medullary pattern carcinomas had a great response to treatment, with PCR rate of 100%, and 5-year DFS rate of 92.8%. Apocrine carcinomas also had favorable prognosis, with no recurrence after early disease treatment, and 5-year DFS rate of 83.3%. Adenoid cystic carcinomas had intermediate prognosis, with 5-year DFS rate of 66.6%., Conclusion: SHT of TNBC encompasses heterogeneous malignancies with distinct behaviors. Lobular and metaplastic carcinomas showed high aggressiveness and poor treatment response, while medullary pattern and apocrine carcinomas had favorable outcomes. Treatment strategies focus on molecular features of each of these diseases are warranted., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Patients with small node-negative HER2-positive breast cancer are commonly treated with paclitaxel and 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab. We performed a sub-analysis of the ALTTO trial to explore the long-term outcomes of patients with small node-negative tumours., Methods: The ALTTO trial randomised 8381 patients with early HER2-positive BC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (anthracycline/taxane- or taxane/carboplatin-based), to trastuzumab (T), lapatinib (L), their sequence (T → L) or their combination (L + T). Patients with tumours ≤3 cm and node-negative were included in this sub-analysis., Results: A total of 2821 patients were analysed (median follow-up of 7 years). The median age was 52 years, and most patients had tumours ≤2 cm (64.3%). The 7-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 88.1% (95% CI: 86.7-89.3%). DFS was similar for arms T, T + L and T⟶L and significantly lower for arm L (stratified log-rank P = 0.031). The 7-year overall survival rate was 95.9% (95% CI: [95.0-96.6%) and the 7-year time-to-distant recurrence was 93.4% (95% CI: 92.3-94.4%)., Conclusion: With most patients treated with anthracycline-based regimens, ALTTO shows that patients with small tumours treated with trastuzumab and concomitant chemotherapy have excellent long-term outcomes, similar to those of the APT trial., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00490139., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the most common histologic subtype of breast cancer after invasive ductal carcinoma (i.e., no special type [NST]). ILC differs from NST in clinical presentation, site-specific metastases and response to conventional therapies. Loss of E-cadherin protein expression, due to alterations in its encoding gene CDH1, is the most frequent oncogenic event in ILC. Synthetic lethality approaches have shown promising antitumor effects of ROS1 inhibitors in models of E-cadherin-defective breast cancer in in vivo studies and provide the rationale for testing their clinical activity in patients with ILC. Entrectinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting TRK, ROS1 and ALK tyrosine kinases. Here, the authors present ROSALINE (NCT04551495), a phase II study testing neoadjuvant entrectinib and endocrine therapy in women with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative early ILC.

Background: Brain metastases (BMs) are frequent events in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and are associated with poor prognosis. Small-molecule anti-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are promising agents for the treatment of BM. In this study, we assess the clinical outcomes of patients with HER2-positive MBC and BM treated with TKI-containing regimens compared with those treated with non-TKI-containing regimens., Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and conference proceedings (ASCO, SABCS, ESMO, and ESMO Breast) were searched up to June 2021. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with BM. Secondary endpoints included PFS in patients without BM and overall survival (OS). The study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Overall effects were pooled using random-effects models., Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis included data from 2437 patients (490 with and 1947 without BM at baseline) enrolled in five trials assessing tucatinib-, lapatinib-, pyrotinib-, or afatinib-based combinations. A nonstatistically significant PFS benefit favoring TKI-containing regimens was observed in both patients with BM [hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-1.12; P = 0.13] and without BM (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.24-1.26; P = 0.16). Sensitivity analysis, excluding each study singly, demonstrated a significant PFS benefit favoring TKI-containing regimens in patients with BM after the exclusion of afatinib from the analysis (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.90; P = 0.016). No statistically significant differences in OS were observed between the comparison groups., Conclusions: A trend in PFS favoring TKI-containing regimens was observed in patients with BM. Sensitivity analysis including only trials that evaluated regimens containing tucatinib, lapatinib, or pyrotinib demonstrated a significant PFS benefit favoring TKI-containing regimens in patients with BM., Competing Interests: Disclosure GNM reports support to attend medical conferences from Roche and Bayer (all outside the submitted work). DMB reports honoraria and advisory board fees from Janssen, Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Angelini, AstraZeneca, and Novartis; meeting/travel grants from LEO Farmacêuticos, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Ipsen, Janssen, Roche, Laboratórios Vitória, and Novartis; and institutional grant from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (all outside the submitted work). EA reports speaking fee from Lilly; support to attend medical conferences from Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Genetic, and Istituto Gentili (all outside the submitted work). ML plays advisory role for Roche, Lilly, Novartis, AstraZeneca, MSD, Seagen, Gilead, Pfizer, and Exact Sciences; and receives speaker honoraria from Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Takeda, Knight, Libbs, and Ipsen (all outside the submitted work). NK reports honoraria and advisory board fees from Erytech, Innate Pharma, Seattle Genetics, and LEO Pharma; and support to attend medical conferences from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and OSE Immunotherapeutics (all outside the submitted work). AA reports support from Roche, Lilly, Amgen, EISAI, BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, Genomic Health, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, LEO Pharma, Merck, Daiichi, Seattle Genetics, and Pierre Fabre (all outside the submitted work). EdA reports honoraria and/or advisory board fees from Roche/GNE, Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Zodiac, Libbs, and Pierre Fabre; travel grants from Roche/GNE and GSK/Novartis; research grant to institution from Roche/GNE, Astra-Zeneca, GSK/Novartis, and Servier (all outside the submitted work). All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an area of high unmet medical need in terms of new effective treatment strategies. Although breast cancer is traditionally considered a 'cold' tumor type, TNBC is the most appropriate subtype for immunotherapeutic strategies; this is due to the high level of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, PD-L1 expression, and tumor mutational burden compared to other breast cancer subtypes., Areas Covered: This review examines the available evidence on the use of immunotherapeutic strategies in early and advanced TNBC, discusses the pitfalls and limitations often encountered in clinical research, and summarizes data on novel promising immunomodulatory approaches that have been explored in early-phase trials., Expert Opinion: PD-1-blockade is approved for stage II/III TNBC and for first-line treatment of PD-L1-positive TNBC patients with metastatic disease and should be considered standard of care. However, question marks and difficulties remain; these include the identification of predictive biomarkers to select patients who benefit from the addition of PD1-blockade and the balance between efficacy and long-term toxicity for an individual patient. Numerous treatment combinations and new immunotherapeutic strategies beyond PD1 blockade are being evaluated, thus reflecting a promising evolution towards a more personalized approach, and extended clinical benefit in TNBC. Abbreviations: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); breast cancers (BCs); estrogen receptor (ER); progesterone receptor (PgR); human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER-2); basal-like 1 (BL1), basal-like 2 (BL2); mesenchymal (MES); mesenchymal stem-like (MSL); immunomodulatory (IM); luminal androgen receptor (LAR); basal-like immunosuppressed (BLIS); basal-like immune-activated (BLIA); tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs); tumor mutational burden (TMB); immune cells (ICs); immunohistochemistry (IHC); overall response rate (ORR); overall survival (OS); progression-free survival (PFS); intention-to-treat (ITT); hazard ratio (HR); confidence interval (CI); Food and Drug Administration (FDA); European Medicines Agency (EMA); immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI); Combined Positive Score (CPS); disease control rate (DCR); neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT); pathological complete response (pCR); event-free survival (EFS); disease-free survival (DFS); residual cancer burden (RCB); San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS); antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs); PARP inhibitors (PARPi); clinical benefit rate (CBR); Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi); Dendritic cell (DC); talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC); granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF); mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR).

HER2-positive breast cancer represents 15%-20% of breast malignancies and is characterized by an aggressive behavior and high recurrence rates. Anti-HER2-directed agents represent the mainstay of treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this review we propose a treatment algorithm for patients with HER2-positive MBC based on the currently available literature on the topic. The combination of trastuzumab, pertuzumab and a taxane (THP) remains the preferred first-line therapy in most scenarios. Results of trials recently presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2021 might have direct clinical impact in the second- and later-line settings. The randomized DESTINY-BREAST03 study compared trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. T-DXd significantly improved progression-free survival and showed a trend towards improved overall survival, establishing this agent as preferred second-line therapy. Treatment with T-DM1, or the combination of tucatinib, trastuzumab and capecitabine, are considered reasonable options after second-line therapy. For subsequent lines, trastuzumab duocarmazine, neratinib plus capecitabine or the continuation of trastuzumab with different chemotherapy partners are valid options. For patients experiencing disease relapse up to 6 months after completion of adjuvant therapy, as well as for those relapsing within 12 months from the completion of pertuzumab-based adjuvant treatment, we recommend T-DXd as preferred first-line option. For those relapsing between 6 and 12 months after non-pertuzumab-based adjuvant treatment, we recommend first-line THP. Finally, for patients with active brain metastasis, tucatinib-based combination represents a suitable second-line option., Competing Interests: Disclosure GNM Travel/accommodations/expenses: Roche and Bayer; DMB Honoraria and advisory board fees from Janssen, Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Angelini, AstraZeneca, and Novartis, and meeting/travel grants from LEO Farmacêuticos, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Ipsen, Janssen, Roche, Laboratórios Vitória, and Novartis; EdA Honoraria and/or advisory board from Roche/GNE, Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Zodiac, Libbs, and Pierre Fabre. Travel grants from Roche/GNE and GSK/Novartis. Research grant to my institution from Roche/GNE, Astra-Zeneca, GSK/Novartis, and Servier., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study aimed to explore whether adherence to intensive nutritional care during radiotherapy would avoid a meaningful worsening in quality of life in head and neck cancer patients; and whether adherence was associated with better nutritional outcomes., Methods: Observational prospective study that assessed head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy at a large oncology hospital, between August 2018 and April 2019. The main outcome was minimal clinically important difference in quality of life, assessed with EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ H&N35, between baseline and 12 weeks. To illustrate clinically significant changes in quality of life over timeby adherence, a heat map analysis was performed. We also evaluated nutritional outcomes., Results: Eighty patients were included, half of them (53.8%) were considered adherent. There were no significant difference in quality of life between groups at baseline, with the exception of swallowing (p = 0.029) and coughing (p < 0.01). After treatment, the heat map demonstrated that adherent patients had nonsignificant clinical change in function scales, while non-adherent patients had a clinically significant worsening in physical, cognitive and social function. The prevalence of malnutrition increased significantly only in non-adherent patients (p < 0.01)., Conclusion: Adherence to intensive nutritional care may be able to avoid a meaningful worsening in quality of life and result in better nutritional outcomes in head and neck cancer patients. Our results may help to increase the awareness of the assessment of adherence and minimal clinically important difference in quality of life for research purposes and clinical practice., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study aimed to validate the Brazilian version of EORTC CAT Core and compare the Brazilian results with those from the original European EORTC CAT Core validation study., Methods: After validated translation, 168 cancer patients from Brazil receiving radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy was assessed. Translated EORTC CAT Core and all QLQ-C30 items were administered to patients using CHES (Computer-Based Health Evaluation System) before (T0) and after (T1) treatment initiation. The association between QLQ-C30 and CAT scores and ceiling/floor effects were estimated. Based on estimates of relative validity (cross-sectional, known-group differences and changes over time), relative sample-size requirements for CAT compared to QLQ-C30 were estimated., Results: Correlation coefficients between CAT and QLQ-C30 domains ranged from 0.63 to 0.93; except for dyspnoea, all coefficients were >0.82 (corresponding figures were 0.81-0.93 in the European study). On average across domains, floor/ceiling was reduced by 10% using CAT (9% in the European study) corresponding to a relative reduction of 32% (37% in the European study). Analyses of known-group validity and responsiveness indicated that, on average across domains, the sample-size requirements may be reduced by 17% using CAT rather than QLQ-C30, without loss of power (28% in the European study). The Brazilian sample had less symptom/quality of life impairment than the European sample, which likely explains the lower sample-size reduction using CAT when comparing with the European sample., Conclusions: The results in the Brazilian cohort were generally similar to those from the European sample and confirm the validity and usefulness of the EORTC CAT Core.

Purpose: Patients with cancer are at increased risk for unfavorable outcomes from COVID-19. Knowledge about the outcome determinants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in this population is essential for risk stratification and definition of appropriate management. Our objective was to evaluate prognostic factors for all-cause mortality in patients diagnosed with both cancer and COVID-19., Methods: All consecutive patients with cancer hospitalized at our institution with COVID-19 were included. Electronic medical records were reviewed for clinical and laboratory characteristics potentially associated with outcomes., Results: Five hundred seventy-six consecutive patients with cancer and COVID-19 were included in the present study. An overall in-hospital mortality rate of 49.3% was demonstrated. Clinical factors associated with increased risk of death because of COVID-19 were age over 65 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status > 0 zero, best supportive care, primary lung cancer, and the presence of lung metastases. Laboratory findings associated with a higher risk of unfavorable outcomes were neutrophilia, lymphopenia, and elevated levels of D-dimer, creatinine, C-reactive protein, or AST., Conclusion: A high mortality rate in patients with cancer who were diagnosed with COVID-19 was demonstrated in the present study, emphasizing the need for close surveillance in this group of patients, especially in those with unfavorable prognostic characteristics., Competing Interests: Guilherme Nader MartaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bayer Schering Pharma, Roche Renata Colombo BonadioResearch Funding: Novartis, AstraZenecaExpert Testimony: AcheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, AstraZeneca Driele Peixoto BittencourtHonoraria: Novo Nordisk, EMS, GE Healthcare, NovartisConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer Camilla Oliveira HoffLeadership: Rede D'OrStock and Other Ownership Interests: OncostarHonoraria: Bayer, Exelixis, Lilly, United MedicalConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, Exelixis, United Medical, LillyResearch Funding: Exelixis, Lilly Juliana PereiraConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca Vanderson RochaHonoraria: Takeda, Novartis, RocheConsulting or Advisory Role: Takeda, Agios, Zodiac Pharma, Novartis, AbbVieSpeakers' Bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, Amgen, Agios, Pfizer, Janssen Paulo M. HoffLeadership: Oncologia D'OrStock and Other Ownership Interests: OncoStar Oncology ClinicsHonoraria: Bayer Health, United MedicalConsulting or Advisory Role: United Health Group, Bayer, Lilly, ExelixisResearch Funding: Bayer, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Exelixis, Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, LillyNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Purpose: A substantial increase in melanoma incidence has been consistently observed worldwide over the past decades. However, melanoma mortality rates have remained stable or declined over the past years in most regions. Given the paucity of melanoma mortality data for different Brazilian regions, we sought to describe melanoma mortality trends in southeastern Brazil and their relationship with demographic variables., Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional registry-based analysis was conducted to describe melanoma mortality trends in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, from 1996 to 2016. Demographic information from melanoma-related death records, including sex and age, was collected from the Fundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados database. The annual percentage change (APC) was calculated to identify mortality trends over the period., Results: An increasing melanoma mortality trend was detected among males, regardless of age (APC, 1.72%; P < .001), and was more pronounced for men ≥ 60 years old (APC, 2.63%; P < .001). Melanoma mortality rates have also increased for patients ≥ 60 years old, regardless of sex (APC, 1.11%; P < .001). A non-statistically significant increase in the overall melanoma mortality rate was observed over the 20-year period analyzed (APC, 0.36%; P = .4)., Conclusion: Our data suggest a stable melanoma mortality over the past two decades for the overall population studied; however, a significant increase in melanoma mortality rates has been demonstrated among males and in the population ≥ 60 years old, emphasizing the need to implement prevention strategies and expand access to effective therapies for this population.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) encompasses a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with distinct clinical behavior and prognoses. As a result of the increasing number of therapeutic options in the metastatic setting, it is crucial to improve prognostic stratification ability. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and combination platelet count and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (COP-NLR) in patients with mRCC. We evaluated a cohort of mRCC patients treated with first-line pazopanib or sunitinib. Levels of NLR, PLR and COP-NLR were measured prior to systemic treatment and evaluated as prognostic predictors. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Data from 276 patients were included, of which 54.7% received first-line pazopanib and 45.3%, sunitinib. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center risk classification was intermediate and poor in 50% and 42.6% of patients, respectively. High NLR (> 3.5) was associated with inferior OS (median 9.6 vs 17.8 months, P < 0.001). A high PLR (> 200) was associated with inferior OS (median 10.3 vs 17 months, P = 0.002). The median OS in the COP-NLR 1, 2 and 3 groups were 19.0 months (95% CI 15.3-26.0), 13.1 months (95% CI 9.8-17.0) and 7.4 months (95% CI 3.6-11.9), respectively (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, high NLR and high COP-NLR were associated with inferior OS. Both high NLR and high COP-NLR were associated with poorer OS in our cohort of patients with mRCC treated with first-line pazopanib or sunitinib.

Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) rates after mastectomy are increasing. Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) contouring guidelines for target volumes in the setting of IBR are lacking. Therefore, many patients who have had IBR receive PMRT to target volumes similar to conventional simulator-based whole breast irradiation. The aim of this paper is to describe delineation guidelines for PMRT after implant-based IBR based on a thorough understanding of the surgical procedures, disease stage, patterns of recurrence and radiation techniques. They are based on a consensus endorsed by a global multidisciplinary group of breast cancer experts., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)