Search

Objectives: Our institution was the victim of a cyberattack that necessitated use of manual laboratory systems for more than 25 days. These manual processes had to be created not only to enable us to process our case volume without bottlenecks but also to maintain patient safety and allow for billing.Methods: Our laboratory needed to create a safe reporting process to ensure ongoing patient safety and error reduction during the downtime. Additionally, we needed to ensure the ability to bill for performed tests in some areas of the lab and maintain compliance with regulatory policies.Results: Amendment rates in our system were higher than before the attack, but no patient harm was observed. Intraoperative assessments declined, but high-acuity cases continued with a discrepancy rate comparable with the normal state. Many hours and resources (human and otherwise) were necessary to reconcile the work done to bill for services, but we were able to capture revenue through careful planning.Conclusions: This article records the challenges we faced and the successes we achieved in maintaining compliance and a low error rate in the face of manual processes, the steps necessary to bring the cases into the newly restored electronic health record, and how we billed for the services we rendered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Our institution was subject to a multi-institutional, systemwide cyberattack that led to a complete shutdown of multiple major patient care, operational, and communication systems for more than 25 days. The electronic health record computer system was taken offline, as was the hospital email and authentication systems, internet access, and the laboratory information system. The impact on the hospital and patient care was substantial, and our laboratories were crippled.Methods: Our laboratory endured challenges in communication because of the loss of connectivity and difficulties in laboratory management, and we recognized a need to restructure leadership to maintain operations during the crisis. As an academic institution, residents and trainees were also significantly affected by the disaster.Results: We developed an incident command team (ICT), alternative methods of communication, and innovative management strategies to remain operational. Trainees were incorporated into the disaster-relief efforts, with negative impacts on resident education.Conclusions: This paper focuses on the challenges in communication and lab management as well as the need for an alternative leadership structure during the crisis. We also highlight the unique experience of our trainees during this prolonged downtime, underscoring the importance of incorporating resident trainees into the daily ICT's administrative activities as an invaluable lab management experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Our institution was affected by a multi-institution, systemwide cyberattack that led to a complete shutdown of major patient care, operational, and communication systems. The attack affected our electronic health record (EHR) system, including all department-specific modules, the laboratory information system (LIS), pharmacy, scheduling, billing and coding, imaging software, internet access, and payroll. Downtime for the EHR lasted 25 days, while other systems were nonfunctional for more than 40 days, causing disruptions to patient care and significantly affecting our laboratories. As more institutions transition to network EHR systems, laboratories are increasingly vulnerable to cyberattack. This article focuses on the approaches we developed in the anatomic pathology (AP) laboratory to continue operations, consequences of the prolonged downtime, and strategies for the future.Methods: Our AP laboratory developed manual processes for surgical and cytopathology processing, redeployed staff, and used resources within the department and of nearby facilities to regain and maintain operations.Results: During the downtime, our AP laboratory processed 1,362 surgical pathology and consult cases as well as 299 cytology specimens and outsourced 1,308 surgical pathology and 1,250 cytology cases.Conclusions: Our laboratory successfully transitioned to downtime processes during a 25-day complete network outage. The crisis allowed for innovative approaches in managing resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: ThinPrep® (TP) cervical cytology, as a liquid‑based method, has many benefits but also a relatively high unsatisfactory rate due to debris/lubricant contamination and the presence of blood. These contaminants clog the TP filter and prevent the deposition of adequate diagnostic cells on the slide. An acetic acid wash (AAW) protocol is often used to lyse red blood cells, before preparing the TP slides. Design: From 23,291 TP cervical cytology specimens over a 4‑month period, 2739 underwent AAW protocol due to initial unsatisfactory smear (UNS) with scant cellularity due to blood or being grossly bloody. Randomly selected 2739 cervical cytology specimens which did not undergo AAW from the same time period formed the control (non‑AAW) group. Cytopathologic interpretations of AAW and non‑AAW groups were compared using the Chi‑square test. Results: About 94.2% of the 2739 cases which underwent AAW were subsequently satisfactory for evaluation with interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) 4.9% (135), low‑grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) 3.7% (102), and high‑grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) 1% (28). From the 2739 control cases, 96.3% were satisfactory with ASCUS 5.5% (151), LSIL 5.1% (139), and HSIL 0.7% (19). The prevalence of ASCUS interpretations was similar (P = 0.33). Although there were 32% more HSIL interpretations in the AAW group (28 in AAW vs. 19 in non‑AAW), the difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.18). AAW category; however, had significantly fewer LSIL interpretations (P = 0.02). The percentage of UNS cases remained higher in the AAW group with statistical significance (P < 0.01). Conclusions: While AAW had a significantly higher percent of UNS interpretations, the protocol was effective in rescuing 94.2% of specimens which otherwise may have been reported unsatisfactory. This improved patient care by avoiding a repeat test. The prevalence of ASCUS and HSIL interpretations between AAW and non‑AAW groups were comparable. Though not statistically significant, HSIL interpretations were relatively higher in the AAW group. LSIL interpretations showed lower prevalence in AAW group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In cervical cytology, the unsatisfactory rates for ThinPrep (TP) are slightly higher compared to SurePath. We examined various causes and explored potential for resolution of this discrepancy. Materials and Methods: Totally, 19,422 cases were reviewed and 1000 unsatisfactory specimens were selected and analyzed. 531 specimens were available for wash protocol. Out of 114 unsatisfactory specimens associated with atrophic cellular changes (ACC), 48 were resubmitted by provider and reevaluated. Results: Lubricant and lubricant-like debris/contamination (LUBE) was the most common cause of unsatisfactory specimens (68%; 681/1000) followed by blood (7.5%); ACC only (without other interfering factors) (2.4%); inflammation (3.0%); and combinations thereof (1.9%). 11.5% showed scant cellularity without an identifiable cause. 3.3% were virtually acellular. Wash protocol improved cellularity in 48% (256/531) of cases. However, only 29% (73/256) of those were satisfactory (with more than 5000 cells). Quantitative reduction in LUBE after wash protocol varied with different morphological subtypes. Interpretation patterns on satisfactory specimens after wash protocol were comparable to the results on selected cohort of specimens during the same study period. Out of 114 ACC, wash protocol was performed on 68 ACC specimens leading to satisfactory TP in 24% (16/68). Totally, 48 cases reported as unsatisfactory with ACC, were resubmitted by the providers between 2 weeks and 2 years. 44 (92%) showed increased cellularity, out of which 52% (23/44) did not show ACC. Conclusion: LUBE was the most common cause of unsatisfactory TP in addition to interference by blood and association with atrophic changes. Knowing the morphological spectrum of LUBE would help to identify it as the cause of “unsatisfactory” TP. Communicating the cause of unsatisfactory TP such as LUBE, ACC, and blood would hint the provider to take appropriate precaution during submission of the repeat specimen, leading to improved patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The recovery of cells after washing core needle biopsies represents an under-utilized approach to extend the diagnostic capacity of these diminutive specimens. Recovery of these cells can be dedicated for molecular studies so that the biopsy itself can be used apropos for its intended purpose, diagnosis. Non-enzymatic and enzymatic reagents have the potential to increase the number of cells dissociating from the tissue core, but can also negatively impact the quality of the tissue itself., Materials and Methods: Three different means (phosphate-buffered saline, a non-enzymatic and an enzymatic solution) were used to wash core needle biopsies. The washed cells were recovered by traditional preparatory methods and evaluated for cellularity and cytomorphology. The post-washed cores were processed by formalin fixation, paraffin embedding and evaluated for integrity and morphological quality., Results: The enzymatic solution damaged both the cytological and tissue specimens, while the saline and non-enzymatic process allowed for the comparable recovery of cells and tissue for evaluation., Conclusion: Adequate numbers of cells are dissociated from the tissue core when needle biopsies are washed. The recovery and preservation of cells and tissue for morphological interpretation was optimal when solutions devoid of enzymes were used for washing., (Copyright© 2015 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)

Background: The era of Open Access (OA) publication, a platform which serves to better disseminate scientific knowledge, is upon us, as more OA journals are in existence than ever before. The idea that peer-reviewed OA publication leads to higher rates of citation has been put forth and shown to be true in several publications. This is a significant benefit to authors and is in addition to another relatively less obvious but highly critical component of the OA charter, i.e. retention of the copyright by the authors in the public domain. In this study, we analyzed the citation rates of OA and traditional non-OA publications specifically for authors in the field of cytopathology., Design: We compared the citation patterns for authors who had published in both OA and traditional non-OA peer-reviewed, scientific, cytopathology journals. Citations in an OA publication (CytoJournal) were analyzed comparatively with traditional non-OA cytopathology journals (Acta Cytologica, Cancer Cytopathology, Cytopathology, and Diagnostic Cytopathology) using the data from web of science citation analysis site (based on which the impact factors (IF) are calculated). After comparing citations per publication, as well as a time adjusted citation quotient (which takes into account the time since publication), we also analyzed the statistics after excluding the data for meeting abstracts., Results: Total 28 authors published 314 publications as articles and meeting abstracts (25 authors after excluding the abstracts). The rate of citation and time adjusted citation quotient were higher for OA in the group where abstracts were included (P < 0.05 for both). The rates were also slightly higher for OA than non-OA when the meeting abstracts were excluded, but the difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.57 and P = 0.45)., Conclusion: We observed that for the same author, the publications in the OA journal attained a higher rate of citation than the publications in the traditional non-OA journals in the field of cytopathology over a 5 year period (2007-2011). However, this increase was statistically insignificant if the meeting abstracts were excluded from the analysis. Overall, the rates of citation for OA and non-OA were slightly higher to comparable.