1. Evaluating the Use of Machine Learning to Predict Expert-Driven Pareto-Navigated Calibrations for Personalised Automated Radiotherapy Planning.
- Author
-
Foster, Iona, Spezi, Emiliano, and Wheeler, Philip
- Subjects
AUTOMATED planning & scheduling ,RADIOTHERAPY treatment planning ,PROSTATE cancer patients ,MACHINE learning ,WEIGHT training ,CALIBRATION - Abstract
Featured Application: Fully automated and personalised radiotherapy treatment planning. Automated planning (AP) uses common protocols for all patients within a cancer site. This work investigated using machine learning to personalise AP protocols for fully individualised planning. A 'Pareto guided automated planning' (PGAP) solution was used to generate patient-specific AP protocols and gold standard Pareto navigated reference plans (MCO
gs ) for 40 prostate cancer patients. Anatomical features related to geometry were extracted and two ML approaches (clustering and regression) that predicted patient-specific planning goal weights were trained on patients 1–20. For validation, three plans were generated for patients 21–40 using a standard site-specific AP protocol based on averaged weights (PGAPstd ) and patient-specific AP protocols generated via regression (PGAP-MLreg ) and clustering (PGAP-MLclus ). The three methods were compared to MCOgs in terms of weighting factors and plan dose metrics. Results demonstrated that at the population level PGAPstd , PGAP-MLreg and PGAP-MLclus provided excellent correspondence with MCOgs . Deviations were either not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.05), or of a small magnitude, with all coverage and hotspot dose metrics within 0.2 Gy of MCOgs and OAR metrics within 0.7% and 0.4 Gy for volume and dose metrics, respectively. When compared to PGAPstd , patient-specific protocols offered minimal advantage for this cancer site, with both approaches highly congruent with MCOgs . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF