Search

Walleye Sander vitreus, Sauger S. canadensis, and Yellow Perch Perca flavescens (referred to as percids herein) are collectively among the most culturally and ecologically important fish species in North America. As ecosystems change in response to environmental drivers, such as climate change, nutrient loading, and invasive species, there is a need to understand how percid populations respond to these changes. To address this need, a symposium was held during the 81st Annual Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference to bring fishery scientists and managers together to describe and discuss percid population responses to ecosystem change. Prevailing symposium themes included the challenge of identifying mechanisms responsible for population‐level changes, developing strategies to adaptively manage for resilient fisheries, and consideration of scale, context, and methods when interpreting variable results. Given the uncertainty of how ecosystem changes affect percid populations, participants emphasized the importance of communicating uncertainties to stakeholders, implementing data‐driven management strategies, setting realistic goals, and revising management actions in an adaptive framework. There was universal agreement on both the challenge and necessity of facilitating constructive engagement among stakeholders in cooperative decision making. Symposium participants identified knowledge gaps and discussed future efforts to build on our current understanding of percid populations, including continuation of long‐term monitoring, improved standardization of evaluation metrics, implementing adaptive management experiments to identify causal relationships, development of more robust analytical methods, use of historical data sources, and refining techniques to realistically convey management options to stakeholders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Walleye Sander vitreus and Yellow Perch Perca flavescens are culturally, economically, and ecologically significant fish species in North America that are affected by drivers of global change. Here, we review and synthesize the published literature documenting the effects of ecosystem changes on Walleye and Yellow Perch. We focus on four drivers: climate (including temperature and precipitation), aquatic invasive species, land use and nutrient loading, and water clarity. We identified 1,232 tests from 370 papers, split evenly between Walleye (n = 613) and Yellow Perch (n = 619). Climate was the most frequently studied driver (n = 572), and growth or condition was the most frequently studied response (n = 297). The most commonly reported relationship was "no effect" (42% of analyses), usually because multiple variables were tested and only a few were found to be significant. Overall responses varied among studies for most species‐response–driver combinations. For example, the influence of invasive species on growth of both Walleye and Yellow Perch was approximately equally likely to be positive, negative, or have no effect. Even when results were variable, important patterns emerged; for example, growth responses of both species to temperature were variable, but very few negative responses were observed. A few relationships were relatively consistent across studies. Invasive species were negatively associated with Walleye recruitment and abundance, and higher water clarity was negatively associated with Walleye abundance, biomass, and production. Some variability in responses may be due to differences in methodology or the range of variables studied; others represent true context dependence, where the effect of a driver depends on the influence of other variables. Using common metrics of impact, publishing negative results, and robust analytical approaches could facilitate comparisons among systems and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the responses of Walleye and Yellow Perch to ecosystem change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Assessment of the Walleye Sander vitreus angling and tribal spearing fisheries in the Ceded Territory of Wisconsin (CTWI) is critical for the sustainability of this resource. Key to these assessments is an understanding of harvest demographics, exploitation, catch and harvest efficiency, and relationships between catch or harvest and adult density. We characterized the size distribution and mean length of harvested Walleyes, harvest, exploitation rate, and catch (angling) or harvest (spearing) rate for both fisheries during 1990–2015. Then, we evaluated catch and harvest rates in relation to adult density and tested for self‐regulation or hyperstability in each fishery. Size distribution and mean length of harvested Walleyes in both fisheries were statistically different but biologically similar. Anglers harvested significantly more Walleyes, and the mean exploitation rate was greater in the angling fishery. Spearfishers had significantly higher mean harvest rates compared with angler catch rates. Catch and harvest rates followed an asymptotic relationship with adult density, with the spear fishery showing more hyperstability than the angling fishery. In the CTWI, naturally reproducing Walleye populations are managed for densities ≥7.4 adults/ha. Our results suggest that maintaining adult Walleye densities near the point of diminishing returns of the asymptotic relationship (10–15 Walleyes/ha) will result in a sustainable fishery that also maximizes tribal harvest and angler catch. However, maintaining adult Walleye densities within this range in the unproductive lakes typical of the CTWI may be unrealistic. Due to the hyperstability observed in each fishery, active management of the spear fishery should continue and monitoring of the angling fishery should also continue given recent declines in natural recruitment and production observed in the CTWI in order to maintain Walleye populations in a "safe operating space." An empirical understanding of CTWI Walleye angler and spearfisher effort dynamics is critically needed to mechanistically explain the observed hyperstability in each fishery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We modeled variation in recruitment ( R) of age-0 muskellunge to identify factors influencing their abundance in Escanaba Lake, Wisconsin. Muskellunge R declined over the study period and ranged from 0.00 to 1.85 age-0 fish/km of shoreline (mean = 0.42 age-0 fish/km of shoreline). A Ricker stock-recruitment model determined that the following factors explained 88% of the variation in annual R of age-0 muskellunge between 1987 and 2006: abundance and age structure of the adult muskellunge population, abundance of bluntnose minnow , abundance of age-3 and older (age-3+) walleyes , abundance of age-0 white suckers , and coefficient of variation (CV) of May water temperatures. Abundance of adult muskellunge (≥76.2 cm total length) accounted for only 1% of the variation in R and showed no significant relationship with R. Abundance of bluntnose minnow improved the model fit to 40% of the variation in R and indicated that higher R was achieved with greater numbers of bluntnose minnow. The average age of adult muskellunge further improved the model fit to 59% of the variation in R, suggesting that R increased when more young adults were present in the population. The abundance of age-3+ walleyes enhanced the model fit to 69% of the variation in R and indicated that greater R occurred with high numbers of walleyes. The abundance of age-0 white suckers improved the model to explain 77% of the variation in R and indicated that more recruits occurred when numbers of age-0 white suckers were low. Finally, the CV of May water temperatures further improved the model to explain 88% of the variation in R and signified that lower variability in May water temperatures was beneficial to recruitment success. We interpret the model results to mean that muskellunge R in Escanaba Lake is regulated by the reproductive potential of the adult muskellunge population, forage availability, variation in May water temperatures, and other community dynamics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]