Search

The high public regard for nurses has not necessarily translated into an adequate supply of individuals who are willing to be nurses. The expected future demand for nurse labor challenges us to look more closely at the public's perceptions of nursing and nursing careers, and consider how they are shaped by personal experience, media messages, and socio-demographic factors. As part of ongoing efforts to examine factors shaping the future of the nursing workforce, a national survey of Americans was conducted to probe attitudes toward the nursing profession and their experiences with nurses. The data in this national survey of the public about nursing demonstrate that the nursing profession is highly respected and that the vast majority of the general public would recommend nursing careers to qualified students. If the profession is so well thought of and so highly recommended, why are there persistent concerns that not enough people are becoming RNs to avoid or at least slow down the development of future shortages? A prolonged and persistent effort is needed to educate people about nursing careers, to stimulate the expanded production of nursing faculty, and to bring creative approaches to financing nursing education and workforce improvements to convert the large number of seriously interested candidates into the nursing profession. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Americans with disabilities have wide-ranging health care needs and face serious challenges in the health care system. This 2003 survey of 1,505 nonelderly adults with disabilities finds relatively large shares of people with disabilities reporting cost-related barriers to care. The study also reveals marked differences in cost-related experiences both between those with and without health insurance and across sources of coverage. These findings suggest the need for additional research, along with policies to provide health insurance to people with disabilities who lack coverage, to fill gaps in coverage among those with Medicare and private insurance, and to maintain coverage for Medicaid enrollees amid rising costs and state budget shortfalls. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although polling is not irredeemably broken, changes in technology and society create challenges that, if not addressed well, can threaten the quality of election polls and other important surveys on topics such as the economy. This essay describes some of these challenges and recommends remediations to protect the integrity of all kinds of survey research, including election polls. These 12 recommendations specify ways that survey researchers, and those who use polls and other public-oriented surveys, can increase the accuracy and trustworthiness of their data and analyses. Many of these recommendations align practice with the scientific norms of transparency, clarity, and self-correction. The transparency recommendations focus on improving disclosure of factors that affect the nature and quality of survey data. The clarity recommendations call for more precise use of terms such as "representative sample" and clear description of survey attributes that can affect accuracy. The recommendation about correcting the record urges the creation of a publicly available, professionally curated archive of identified technical problems and their remedies. The paper also calls for development of better benchmarks and for additional research on the effects of panel conditioning. Finally, the authors suggest ways to help people who want to use or learn from survey research understand the strengths and limitations of surveys and distinguish legitimate and problematic uses of these methods., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of National Academy of Sciences.)

Aim of the Study: Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) improve survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), however bystander use remains low. Limited AED training may contribute to infrequent use of these devices, yet no studies have assessed AED training nationally. Given previously documented racial disparities among Latinos in CPR provision and OHCA outcomes, we hypothesized that racial and socioeconomic differences exist in AED training, with Whites having increased training compared to Latinos and higher socioeconomic status being associated with increased training., Methods: We administered a random digit dial survey to a nationally-representative adult sample. Using survey-weighted logistic regression adjusted for location, we assessed race and socioeconomic status of individuals trained in AEDs compared to never-trained individuals., Results: From 09/2015-11/2015, 9022 individuals completed the survey. Of those, 68% had never been AED trained. Self-identified Whites and Blacks were more likely to have AED training compared to Latinos (OR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.43-2.53 and OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.39-2.15, respectively). Higher educational attainment was associated with an increased likelihood of training, with an OR of 4.36 (95% CI: 2.57-7.40) for graduate school compared to less than high school education. Increased household income was not associated with an increase in AED training (p = .08)., Conclusions: The minority of respondents reported AED training. Whites and Blacks were more likely to be trained than Latinos. Higher educational attainment was associated with an increased likelihood of training. These findings highlight an important opportunity to improve training disparities and layperson response to OHCA., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is associated with increased survival from cardiac arrest, yet bystander CPR rates are low in many communities. The overall prevalence of CPR training in the United States and associated individual-level disparities are unknown. We sought to measure the national prevalence of CPR training and hypothesized that older age and lower socioeconomic status would be independently associated with a lower likelihood of CPR training., Methods and Results: We administered a cross-sectional telephone survey to a nationally representative adult sample. We assessed the demographics of individuals trained in CPR within 2 years (currently trained) and those who had been trained in CPR at some point in time (ever trained). The association of CPR training and demographic variables were tested using survey weighted logistic regression. Between September 2015 and November 2015, 9022 individuals completed the survey; 18% reported being currently trained in CPR, and 65% reported training at some point previously. For each year of increased age, the likelihood of being currently CPR trained or ever trained decreased (currently trained: odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99; P <0.01; ever trained: OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99; P =0.04). Furthermore, there was a greater then 4-fold difference in odds of being currently CPR trained from the 30-39 to 70-79 year old age groups (95% CI, 0.10-0.23). Factors associated with a lower likelihood of CPR training were lesser educational attainment and lower household income ( P <0.01 for each of these variables)., Conclusions: A minority of respondents reported current training in CPR. Older age, lesser education, and lower income were associated with reduced likelihood of CPR training. These findings illustrate important gaps in US CPR education and suggest the need to develop tailored CPR training efforts to address this variability., (© 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.)

Background: Little is known about the prevalence and cumulative burden of coexisting health conditions including chronic joint and muscular pain, urinary incontinence (UI), depression, osteoporosis risk, moderate/severe vasomotor symptoms, and vulvar/vaginal atrophy (VVA). We surveyed a nationally representative U.S. sample of midlife (age 40-64 years) women to ascertain the prevalence, general health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and health-seeking behaviors associated with these six conditions., Methods: This cross-sectional, telephone survey collected data from a sample of English- and Spanish-speaking U.S. women. The survey contained demographic and menopausal status questions, and also five condition-specific symptom/disease risk-screening instruments. The EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire was used to measure HRQoL. Health-seeking behavior was measured based on clinician discussion of and recent treatment for each condition., Results: Three thousand fifty eight women (mean age 53.4 years) completed the survey. The majority were white (75.6%), married (60.5%), employed full- or part-time (59.0%), and postmenopausal (69.8%; based on self-report). The prevalence [95% confidence interval] of 0, 1, 2, and ≥3 conditions was 35.2% [33.5-36.9], 34.2% [32.5-35.9], 17.9% [16.6-19.3], and 12.7% [11.5-13.9], respectively. Osteoporosis risk (30.6%) was most prevalent, followed by VVA (27.8%) and UI (26.6%). UI and VVA coexisted most frequently (11.3%), followed by osteoporosis risk and VVA (9.8%). EQ-5D scores decreased with increasing number of illnesses (0, 1, 2, and ≥3 conditions, means: 0.92, 0.87, 0.77, 0.61, respectively; p<0.01). Health-seeking behavior varied by condition., Conclusion: Over 25% of women surveyed had multiple coexisting conditions. Lower HRQoL was associated with multiple conditions and with each added condition.

Background: Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer care and survival are well documented. Patient navigation has been shown to improve timely follow-up of abnormal breast screenings for underserved patients. Few studies showed the impact of navigation on patient experiences of care., Objective: We compared the experiences of patients enrolled in a patient navigator program and non-navigated patients referred to a hospital breast center for follow-up of abnormal mammogram in an underserved community health center population., Design: Group comparison study using data from a mail and telephone survey to measure the experience of navigated and non-navigated patients., Participants: English- and Spanish-speaking patients with abnormal mammography attending the Avon Breast Center between April 1, 2005 and April 30, 2007. Seventy-two navigated patients and 181 non-navigated patients completed surveys; the survey response rate was 53.6%., Main Measures: Timeliness of care, preparation for the visit to the breast center, ease of access, quality of care, provider communication, unmet need and patient satisfaction., Key Results: Most measures of the patient experience did not differ between navigated and non-navigated patients. Overall quality of care was rated as excellent (55% vs 62%, p = 0.294). Navigated patients were significantly more likely than non-navigated to 'definitely' understand what to expect at their visit (79% vs 60%, p = 0.003), to receive a reminder letter or telephone call (89% vs 77%, p = 0.029), and to feel welcome (89% vs 75%, p = 0.012). Navigated patients were less likely than non-navigated to rate the concern shown for their cultural/religious beliefs as excellent (45% vs 54%, p = 0.014)., Conclusions: Assessing patient perspectives is essential to evaluate the success of quality improvement interventions. In our center, we measured few significant disparities in the perceptions of care of these two very different populations of patients, although, there are still areas in which our program needs improvement. Further research is needed to understand the effectiveness of patient navigation programs in reducing racial and ethnic disparities.