Search

While detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by diagnostic reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is highly sensitive for viral RNA, the nucleic acid amplification of subgenomic RNAs (sgRNAs) that are the product of viral replication may more accurately identify replication. We characterized the diagnostic RNA and sgRNA detection by RT-PCR from nasal swab samples collected daily by participants in postexposure prophylaxis or treatment studies for SARS-CoV-2. Among 1932 RT-PCR–positive swab samples with sgRNA tests, 40% (767) had detectable sgRNA. Above a diagnostic RNA viral load (VL) threshold of 5.1 log10 copies/mL, 96% of samples had detectable sgRNA with VLs that followed a linear trend. The trajectories of diagnostic RNA and sgRNA VLs differed, with 80% peaking on the same day but duration of sgRNA detection being shorter (8 vs 14 days). With a large sample of daily swab samples we provide comparative sgRNA kinetics and a diagnostic RNA threshold that correlates with replicating virus independent of symptoms or duration of illness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Transmission rates after exposure to a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-positive individual within households and healthcare settings varies significantly between studies. Variability in the extent of exposure and community SARS-CoV-2 incidence may contribute to differences in observed rates.Methods: We examined risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a randomized controlled trial of hydroxychloroquine as postexposure prophylaxis. Study procedures included standardized questionnaires at enrollment and daily self-collection of midturbinate swabs for SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing. County-level incidence was modeled using federally sourced data. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using modified Poisson regression.Results: Eighty-six of 567 (15.2%) household/social contacts and 12 of 122 (9.8%) healthcare worker contacts acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection. Exposure to 2 suspected index cases (vs 1) significantly increased risk for both household/social contacts (relative risk [RR], 1.86) and healthcare workers (RR, 8.18). Increased contact time also increased risk for healthcare workers (3-12 hours: RR, 7.82, >12 hours: RR, 11.81, vs ≤2 hours), but not for household/social contacts. County incidence did not impact risk.Conclusions: In our study, increased exposure to SARS-CoV-2 within household or healthcare settings led to higher risk of infection, but elevated community incidence did not. This reinforces the importance of interventions to decrease transmission in close contact settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Coronavirus disease 2019 symptom definitions rarely include symptom severity. We collected daily nasal swab samples and symptom diaries from contacts of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) case patients. Requiring ≥1 moderate or severe symptom reduced sensitivity to predict SARS-CoV-2 shedding from 60.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.9%−66.7%) to 31.5% (95% CI, 25.7%− 38.0%) but increased specificity from 77.5% (95% CI, 75.3%−79.5%) to 93.8% (95% CI, 92.7%−94.8%). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Influenza vaccine immunogenicity was assessed as part of a cluster-randomized trial. • Children aged 6 months through 8 years in rural Senegal were enrolled. • Inactivated influenza vaccines were immunogenic in Senegalese children. • Seroconversion rates are higher for older children and with influenza A antigens. • Antigenically naïve children have lower post-vaccine geometric mean titers. Data on influenza vaccine immunogenicity in children are limited from tropical developing countries. We recently reported significant, moderate effectiveness of a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) in a controlled, cluster-randomized trial in children in rural Senegal during 2009, a year of H3N2 vaccine mismatch (NCT00893906). We report immunogenicity of IIV3 and inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) from that trial. We evaluated hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and polio antibody titers in response to vaccination of three age groups (6 through 35 months, 3 through 5 years, and 6 through 8 years). As all children were IIV naïve, each received two vaccine doses, although titers were assessed after only the first dose for subjects aged 6 through 8 years. Seroconversion rates (4-fold titer rise or increase from <1:10 to ≥1:40) were 74–87% for A/H1N1, 76–87% for A/H3N2, and 54–79% for B/Yamagata. Seroprotection rates (HAI titer ≥ 1:40) were 79–88% for A/H1N1, 88–96% for A/H3N2, and 52–74% for B/Yamagata. IIV responses were lowest in the youngest age group, and they were comparable between ages 3 through 5 years after two doses and 6 through 8 years after one dose. We found that baseline seropositivity (HAI titer ≥ 1:10) was an effect modifier of IIV response. Using a seroprotective titer (HAI titer ≥ 1:160) recommended for IIV evaluation in children, we found that among subjects who were seropositive at baseline, 69% achieved seroprotection for both A/H1N1 and A/H3N2, while among those who were seronegative at baseline, seroprotection was achieved in 11% for A/H1N1 and 22% for A/H3N2. The IPV group had high baseline polio antibody seropositivity and appropriate responses to vaccination. Our data emphasize the importance of a two-dose IIV3 series in vaccine naïve children. IIV and IPV vaccines were immunogenic in Senegalese children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the emergence of COVID-19 in the context of the virus characteristics and pathogenesis, transmission, clinical syndrome, and potential therapeutics or vaccines. Topics covered include Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and seasonal human CoVs that circulate yearly as mild common cold viruses causing upper respiratory symptoms.

The Omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exhibits reduced susceptibility to vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies, requiring a boost to generate protective immunity. We assess the magnitude and short-term durability of neutralizing antibodies after homologous and heterologous boosting with mRNA and Ad26.COV2.S vaccines. All prime-boost combinations substantially increase the neutralization titers to Omicron, although the boosted titers decline rapidly within 2 months from the peak response compared with boosted titers against the prototypic D614G variant. Boosted Omicron neutralization titers are substantially higher for homologous mRNA vaccine boosting, and for heterologous mRNA and Ad26.COV2.S vaccine boosting, compared with homologous Ad26.COV2.S boosting. Homologous mRNA vaccine boosting generates nearly equivalent neutralizing activity against Omicron sublineages BA.1, BA.2, and BA.3 but modestly reduced neutralizing activity against BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/BA.5 compared with BA.1. These results have implications for boosting requirements to protect against Omicron and future variants of SARS-CoV-2. This trial was conducted under ClincalTrials.gov: NCT04889209., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests R.L.A., C.D.I., C.M.P., D.S., R.P.C., M.E.D., A.E., H.M.E.S., R.E.R., M.B., A.C.K., T.M.B., D.D., R.N.C., J.I.A., S.C., J.A.Z., S.U.N., E.R.B., and D.J.P. report no competing interests. K.E.L. receives grant awards from Pfizer, Inc., COVID-19 vaccine research. L.A.J.’s institution receives grant funding from NIH and CDC for vaccine-related assessments, including those of COVID-19 vaccines. A.R.B. has grant funding from Pfizer, Janssen, Merck, and Cyanvac for non-COVID-19-related work and serves as a consultant for GSK and Janssen. C.A.R.'s institution has received funds to conduct clinical research from the National Institutes of Health, CDC, BioFire, Inc., Genentech, GSK, Janssen, MedImmune, Merck, Micron, Moderna, Novavax, PaxVax, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sanofi-Pasteur. She is co-inventor of patented RSV vaccine technology, which has been licensed to Meissa Vaccines, Inc. J.M.M. has served as a consultant for Merck, Sharp, and Dohme for non-Covid-related work. C.J. receives funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, NIH, and CDC, consults for Gilead and Abbvie, serves on a DSMB for MedPace, and receives royalties from UpToDate. M.J.M. has laboratory research and clinical trials contracts for vaccines or MAB versus SARS-CoV-2 with Lilly, Pfizer (exclusive of the current work), and Sanofi and personal fees for Scientific Advisory Board service from Merck, Meissa Vaccines, Inc., and Pfizer. R.C.B. receives funding for vaccine trials from Path Nipah and Pfizer. R.W.F. receives funding to perform clinical trials from Pfizer, Moderna, Astra Zeneca, and Emergent Health, and he serves on advisory boards for Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Sanofi Pasteur, and Seqirus. S.E. receives funding to her institution from Sanofi Pasteur for a non-COVID-19 vaccine study. K.M.N. holds a grant from Pfizer, without salary support, for a COVID-19 vaccine study and salary support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for work on multiple COVID-19 vaccine trials. D.S.S. is supported by grant awards from NIH/NIAID. P.C.R. and J.H.B. report a pending US patent application no. 63/025918 entitled “Coronavirus RNA vaccines and methods of use.” D.C.M. receives funding from NIH and Moderna for laboratory studies of COVID-19 vaccine antibody responses. M.S.S. receives funding from Moderna, Inc., and Ocugen. D.C.M. receives funding from Moderna, Inc., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although the three vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) that have received emergency use authorization in the United States are highly effective, breakthrough infections are occurring. Data are needed on the serial use of homologous boosters (same as the primary vaccine) and heterologous boosters (different from the primary vaccine) in fully vaccinated recipients., Methods: In this phase 1-2, open-label clinical trial conducted at 10 sites in the United States, adults who had completed a Covid-19 vaccine regimen at least 12 weeks earlier and had no reported history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection received a booster injection with one of three vaccines: mRNA-1273 (Moderna) at a dose of 100 μg, Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson-Janssen) at a dose of 5×10 10 virus particles, or BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) at a dose of 30 μg. The primary end points were safety, reactogenicity, and humoral immunogenicity on trial days 15 and 29., Results: Of the 458 participants who were enrolled in the trial, 154 received mRNA-1273, 150 received Ad26.COV2.S, and 153 received BNT162b2 as booster vaccines; 1 participant did not receive the assigned vaccine. Reactogenicity was similar to that reported for the primary series. More than half the recipients reported having injection-site pain, malaise, headache, or myalgia. For all combinations, antibody neutralizing titers against a SARS-CoV-2 D614G pseudovirus increased by a factor of 4 to 73, and binding titers increased by a factor of 5 to 55. Homologous boosters increased neutralizing antibody titers by a factor of 4 to 20, whereas heterologous boosters increased titers by a factor of 6 to 73. Spike-specific T-cell responses increased in all but the homologous Ad26.COV2.S-boosted subgroup. CD8+ T-cell levels were more durable in the Ad26.COV2.S-primed recipients, and heterologous boosting with the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine substantially increased spike-specific CD8+ T cells in the mRNA vaccine recipients., Conclusions: Homologous and heterologous booster vaccines had an acceptable safety profile and were immunogenic in adults who had completed a primary Covid-19 vaccine regimen at least 12 weeks earlier. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; DMID 21-0012 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04889209.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Current seasonal influenza virus vaccines do not induce robust immune responses to neuraminidase. Several factors, including immunodominance of hemagglutinin over neuraminidase, instability of neuraminidase in vaccine formulations, and variable, nonstandardized amounts of neuraminidase in the vaccines, may contribute to this effect. However, vaccines that induce strong antineuraminidase immune responses would be beneficial, as they are highly protective. Furthermore, antigenic drift is slower for neuraminidase than for hemagglutinin, potentially providing broader coverage. Here, we designed stabilized recombinant versions of neuraminidase by replacing the N-terminal cytoplasmic domain, transmembrane, and extracellular stalk with tetramerization domains from the measles or Sendai virus phosphoprotein or from an Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factor. The measles virus tetramerization domain-based construct, termed N1-MPP, was chosen for further evaluation, as it retained antigenicity, neuraminidase activity, and structural integrity and provided robust protection in vivo against lethal virus challenge in the mouse model. We tested N1-MPP as a standalone vaccine, admixed with seasonal influenza virus vaccines, or given with seasonal influenza virus vaccines but in the other leg of the mouse. Admixture with different formulations of seasonal vaccines led to a weak neuraminidase response, suggesting a dominant effect of hemagglutinin over neuraminidase when administered in the same formulation. However, administration of neuraminidase alone or with seasonal vaccine administered in the alternate leg of the mouse induced robust antibody responses. Thus, this recombinant neuraminidase construct is a promising vaccine antigen that may enhance and broaden protection against seasonal influenza viruses. IMPORTANCE Influenza virus infections remain a high risk to human health, causing up to 650,000 deaths worldwide every year, with an enormous burden on the health care system. Since currently available seasonal vaccines are only partially effective and often mismatched to the circulating strains, a broader protective influenza virus vaccine is needed. Here, we generated a recombinant influenza virus vaccine candidate based on the more conserved neuraminidase surface glycoprotein in order to induce a robust and broader protective immune response against a variety of circulating influenza virus strains.

Background: While Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) vaccines are highly effective, breakthrough infections are occurring. Booster vaccinations have recently received emergency use authorization (EUA) for certain populations but are restricted to homologous mRNA vaccines. We evaluated homologous and heterologous booster vaccination in persons who had received an EUA Covid-19 vaccine regimen., Methods: In this phase 1/2 open-label clinical trial conducted at ten U.S. sites, adults who received one of three EUA Covid-19 vaccines at least 12 weeks prior to enrollment and had no reported history of SARS-CoV-2 infection received a booster injection with one of three vaccines (Moderna mRNA-1273 100-μg, Janssen Ad26.COV2.S 5×10 10 virus particles, or Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 30-μg; nine combinations). The primary outcomes were safety, reactogenicity, and humoral immunogenicity on study days 15 and 29., Results: 458 individuals were enrolled: 154 received mRNA-1273, 150 received Ad26.CoV2.S, and 153 received BNT162b2 booster vaccines. Reactogenicity was similar to that reported for the primary series. Injection site pain, malaise, headache, and myalgia occurred in more than half the participants. Booster vaccines increased the neutralizing activity against a D614G pseudovirus (4.2-76-fold) and binding antibody titers (4.6-56-fold) for all combinations; homologous boost increased neutralizing antibody titers 4.2-20-fold whereas heterologous boost increased titers 6.2-76-fold. Day 15 neutralizing and binding antibody titers varied by 28.7-fold and 20.9-fold, respectively, across the nine prime-boost combinations., Conclusion: Homologous and heterologous booster vaccinations were well-tolerated and immunogenic in adults who completed a primary Covid-19 vaccine regimen at least 12 weeks earlier.