Search

Background The Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) global health crisis has resulted in an unprecedented strain on healthcare systems, reorganization of medical training programs and disruption in professional and personal lives of medical trainees. The impact of COVID-19 on infectious disease (ID) fellows, who are frontline healthcare professionals, has not been assessed. Methods We conducted a national survey of adult and pediatric ID fellows to assess impact on educational activities, availability of personal protective equipment (PPE), well-being, and career prospects. Anxiety and burnout were assessed by 7-item generalized anxiety disorder scale and abbreviated Maslach burnout inventory respectively. Invitations to participate in the survey were sent via email to all ID fellows through Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) fellowship directors. Survey responses collected from August 1 to September 30, 2020 have been reported. Results 136 fellows completed the survey (Table 1). 84% reported their institution had provided evidence-based didactics for management of COVID-19 and 53% indicated their general ID didactics were affected by the pandemic. 86% of fellows were involved in care of patients with COVID-19, and 31% reported a shortage of PPE affecting their clinical duties. Those living in highly impacted states (CA, FL, NY, TX) at the time of the survey were 1.70 times as likely to experience moderate to severe anxiety (vs. minimal to moderate) than those in other states; similarly, those who saw ≥11 COVID-19 patients weekly and reported PPE shortages were 2.5 and 2.0 times as likely, respectively, to experience moderate to severe anxiety compared to their peers who took care of 10 or fewer COVID-19 patients and did not experience PPE shortages. Burnout scores were not significant (Table 2). Table 1. Demographics, Responses to Personal Exposure, Educational Activities and Career Prospects Table 2. Stress, Burnout, Anxiety , Sleep and Quality of Life Among Survey Participants. Conclusion It is imperative that ID fellows feel adequately protected and supported during this pandemic. Pandemic preparedness should be included in the ID fellowship curriculum. Interventions for anxiety and burnout reduction should be implemented. ID fellowship programs should continue to accept feedback from fellows to ensure their ongoing safety, well-being, and education as we navigate this pandemic. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Background In the past decades, behavioral medicine has attained global recognition. Due to its global reach, a critical need has emerged to consider whether the original definition of behavioral medicine is still valid, comprehensive, and inclusive, and to reconsider the main tasks and goals of the International Society of Behavioral Medicine (ISBM), as the umbrella organization in the field. The purpose of the present study was to (i) update the definition and scope of behavioral medicine and its defining characteristics; and (ii) develop a proposal on ISBM’s main tasks and goals. Method Our study used the Delphi method. A core group prepared a discussion paper. An international Delphi panel rated questions and provided comments. The panel intended to reach an a priori defined level of consensus (i.e., 70%). Results The international panel reached consensus on an updated definition and scope of behavioral medicine as a field of research and practice that builds on collaboration among multiple disciplines. These disciplines are concerned with development and application of behavioral and biomedical evidence across the disease continuum in clinical and public health domains. Consensus was reached on a proposal for ISBM’s main tasks and goals focused on supporting communication and collaboration across disciplines and participating organizations; stimulating research, education, and practice; and supporting individuals and organizations in the field. Conclusion The consensus on definition and scope of behavioral medicine and ISBM’s tasks and goals provides a foundational step toward achieving these goals.

Background As the COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to unfold, drastic changes in daily life pose significant challenges on mental and clinical health. While public health interventions such as national lockdowns and social distancing are enforced to reduce the spread of COVID-19, the psychosocial and physical consequences have yet to be determined that may disproportionately affect people living with HIV (PLWH). Methods To evaluate the impact of COVID-related stress on mental and clinical health, we conducted a 20-minute questionnaire eliciting sociodemographic information, clinical and psychological factors from people living in Miami, Fl. All individuals >18 years with or without a history of COVID-19 were included. Participating PLWH were recruited from an existing HIV registry and HIV uninfected participants from community flyers and word of mouth. Results A total of 135 participants were recruited from 05/2020-06/2020. The mean age was 50 years old, 73/135 (54%) were female, and 102/135 (75%) were PLWH. Among participating PLWH, 60/102 (58.8%) self-identified as African American, and 9/102 (8.8%) were positive for COVID-19 by a commercially approved test. Among HIV-negative participants, 15/33 (45.5%) self-identified as White and 11/33 (33%) were positive for COVID-19. Both PLWH and HIV-negative participants described significant disruptions in health care access (47%), difficulty paying basic needs (41%), and feelings of anxiety and depression (48%); there was no statistically significant difference by HIV status. However, HIV negative participants were less likely to experience job loss and income disruption compared to PLWH during the pandemic (70% for HIV-negative vs 48% for PLWH; OR 0.40, p=0.03). Conclusion The impact of COVID-19 on emotional and clinical health is significant in both PLWH and HIV-negative groups. These findings highlight the need for providing mental and physical health care during the pandemic, especially for coping with stress and anxiety during these difficult times and ensuring adequate access to health care. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures