Search

The present work deals with surface modification and gamma (γ) irradiation treatment to improve the performance of polyester/bitumen emulsion polymer-coated jute woven textiles for geotextile applications. There are different formulations of jute used such as raw (untreated) jute textile fabrics (J0) were modified by HEMA (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) monomer (J1), raw jute was only coated with the blend of polyester resin/bitumen emulsion (10 %/30 %) (J2), and the HEMA-treated jute was coated with polymer blends (J3). It was revealed that the HEMA treatment increased the tensile breaking force of the polymer-coated jute textiles (J3) by 13.2 %, and moisture properties decreased by 18–24 %. Further, γ-irradiation of 2.5 and 5.0 kGy was exposed to the processed jute fabrics for the yield of improved performance. In this case, a 5.0 kGy dose of γ-irradiation demonstrated maximum improvement compared to their non-irradiated ones, which is 6.1 % and 3.7 % increase of tensile breaking force for J2 (γ) and J3 (γ), respectively, than their non-irradiated jute samples (J2 and J3), whilst the enhancement of the values were 15.4 % and 17.4 %, respectively, compared to the raw jute (J0) sample. The moisture properties were reduced by up to 60 % as a function of γ-irradiation. Further characterization of the jute fabric samples was assessed by FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared) Spectroscopy, XRD (X-ray diffraction), TGA (Thermogravimetric Analysis), and SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy) testing.

Abstract Cocaine/crack abstinence periods have higher risk of relapse. Abstinence as initial part of the recovery process is affected by learning and memory changes that could preserve the addictive cycle. To further understand how the interruption of cocaine/crack consumption affects neurotrophin level we performed the present systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA statement (number CRD42019121643). The search formula was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases. The inclusion criterion was cocaine use disorder in 18 to 60-year-old people, measuring at least one neurotrophin in blood before and after a controlled abstinence period. Studies without pre-post design were excluded. Five investigations had nine different reports, four of them were subjected to a meta-analysis (n = 146). GRADE risk of bias method was followed. Individual studies reported increased peripheral brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) after abstinence, evidence pooled by Hedge’s g showed no significant change in BDNF after abstinence. Relevant heterogeneity in the length of the abstinence period (12–32 days), last cocaine/crack consumption monitoring and blood processing were detected that could help to explain non-significant results. Further improved methods are suggested, and a potential BDNF augmentation hypothesis is proposed that, if true, would help to understand initial abstinence as a re-adaptation period influenced by neurotrophins such as the BDNF.

Background: Species identification in commercially processed food and feed products is one of the important issues. This study was conducted to develop a genetic method for the detection of pig and cattle species in processed food and feed products using newly designed species-specific primers targeting mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene fragments. Methods: Two sets of specific primers were designed based on the 12S rRNA gene sequences of pig and cattle species from GenBank. The primers were validated by using the DNA extracted from nine different chordates, including pig, cattle, chicken, bata fish, bat, toad, African parrot, rat, and human origin. Annealing temperature ranging from 46-54 °C for 30 seconds and template DNA 1:10 serial dilutions ranging from 10 to 0.00001 ng/µl were employed for primer annealing and sensitivity analysis. Samples were analyzed using optimized Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) conditions. Results: The most intense expected DNA bands of pig and cattle were produced at 50 °C. Under that optimized annealing temperature pig and cattle-specific primers did not anneal with the DNA of other chordates. Total extracted DNA 0.001 ng and 0.01 ng of pig and cattle respectively containing the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) was successfully detected. Conclusion: These findings indicate that the newly designed primer pairs can be used to detect pig and cattle derivatives in various processed food and feed products. DOI: 10.18502/jfqhc.8.4.8256

The purpose of the study is to examine the role of entrepreneur education in the relationship between entrepreneur career and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. The study serves as substantiation for the previous entrepreneurial career studies and promotes better understanding of factors prompting the antecedents to entrepreneurial behavior. There is a need for more empirical research in this aspect because reviewed literature highlighted a number of problems associated with entrepreneurial education and entrepreneurial career in many nations’ world over and particular the developing countries. The study used survey-based method and SEM-PLS is employed to achieve the research objectives of the study. The data is collected from the manufacturing firms in Pakistan.The empirical evidence on the association between entrepreneurial education, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career with moderating effect of SEN will strengthened previously established models such as the entrepreneurial intention model, which is modification in the theory of planned behavior and entrepreneurial event theory, both of which are linked to the theory of reasoned action. It is assumed that human actions are reasoned, controlled and planned. Thus, action is possible for the consequences of the reflected behavior. The findings are in line with the proposed hypothesized results.The study could offer valuable insights into the stage of entrepreneurial education for a range of stakeholders in Pakistan at particular and the world at large. Perhaps it is among the earliest studies of this kind in Pakistan that examined the effects of entrepreneurial education on students’ attitude toward entrepreneurial career. The outcomes from this study would be of beneficial for variety of interested parties including academicians, policymakers, learning institutions, supervisory bodies and the public in general.

Objective: To describe the experience of a Mexican cancer centre in vulvar cancer and the opportunity to incorporate palliative care (PC) during treatment., Patients and Methods: A retrospective study of clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of women with vulvar cancer referred to the PC service (PCS) between 2010 and 2021 is reported. Frequencies were estimated, as well as medians and IQRs, accordingly. Referral time and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: 125 women with vulvar cancer were seen between 2010 and 2021, but only 42% were seen at PCS, mostly polysymptomatic, after several visits to the emergency room. 89% of the patients seen at PCS died at home., Conclusions: Vulvar cancer is a rare type of cancer, while squamous cell carcinoma is the most frequent type. At the time of referral, almost half of the patients had severe pain, bleeding, malodor, infection and urinary incontinence. Most of these patients lived in poverty, were poorly educated and had multiple surgeries. PC may play an important role in the care of patients with advanced vulvar cancer, relieving the physical and psychological symptoms, avoiding unnecessary hospitalisation and favouring death at home without pain and other symptoms., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.)

Background: While targeted therapies have transformed the treatment landscape of oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the influence of sex on treatment outcomes remains insufficiently understood., Objectives: This systematic review aimed to investigate the impact of sex on clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC harboring driver fusions treated with targeted therapies enrolled in clinical trials., Data Sources and Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and relevant conference abstracts to identify phase III randomized and early clinical trials that reported sex-specific data, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate, and adverse events (AEs), in patients with fusion-positive NSCLC treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)., Results: This review involved 10 studies reporting PFS data and 3 studies with OS data, focusing on first-line treatments for ALK fusion (9 studies) and RET fusion-positive (1 study) NSCLC. Pooled analysis of hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS in ALK inhibitors trials revealed no significant differences in survival outcomes based on sex. Additionally, none of the studies provided data on sex-based differences in response rates or toxicities, highlighting a significant knowledge gap regarding the impact of sex on secondary outcomes in targeted therapy., Conclusion: This review found no significant sex-related differences in survival outcomes among patients treated with ALK inhibitors. However, the lack of data on sex-specific response and toxicity emphasizes the need for future research to better understand the role of sex in modulating treatment outcomes and treatment decisions with TKIs., Competing Interests: E.A.—Lectures and educational activities: MSD, Janssen; Consulting, Advisory role: from Amgen and Sanofi; Travel, Accommodations: Amgen, Ipsen. D.M.: Lectures and educational activities: Astellas Pharma, PharmaMar, Roche; Travel, Accommodations: Novartis, Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck. D.I.—Lectures and educational activities: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Pharmamar, Takeda; Consulting, advisory role: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Beigene, Boehringer Ingelheim, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Pharmamar, Sanofi, Takeda; Clinical Trials: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Merck, Mirati, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmamar, Sanofi; Research Grants: AstraZeneca, BMS, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, GSK. G.L.R.—Consulting, advisory role: Merck Sharp and Dohme, Takeda, Amgen, Eli Lilly, BMS, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Italfarmaco, Novartis, Sanofi, Pfizer, AstraZeneca. L.M.—Lectures and educational activities: Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Roche, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, MSD, Radonova; Consulting, advisory role: Roche, Takeda, Janssen, MSD; Research Grants: Inivata, AstraZeneca, Gilead; Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Janssen. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s), 2024.)

Introduction: Pembrolizumab stands as a first-line option for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (PD-L1 ≥50%). Several factors such as antibiotic exposure, low body mass index (BMI), certain metastatic location or poor performance status may influence outcomes., Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis in a cohort of patients with advanced high PD-L1 expression NSCLC treated with first-line pembrolizumab in clinical practice. We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes according to several factors., Results: Among the 494 included patients, median age was 67.29 years, 77% were male, 54% and 38% were former or current smokers, respectively; 84% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) of 0-1, and 48% had a BMI of <25. 32% of patients had bone metastases, 32% brain metastases and 16% liver metastases. 35% of patients had exposure to antibiotics (AB), 44% to corticosteroids and 62% to proton pump inhibitors (PPi). With a median follow-up of 14.3 months, the median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 15.9m (95% CI 13.1 to 18.8) and 9.9m (95% CI 7.7 to 12.1), and the overall response rate (ORR) was 43%. After univariate analysis, median OS in patients with ECOG-PS 0 vs. 1 vs. 2 was 36.7m vs. 14.8m vs. 2.7m (p<0.001). Median OS in patients who received treatment with corticosteroids vs. patients without exposure was 11.4m vs. 22.3m (p<0.001). After multivariate analysis, corticosteroid exposure (HR 1.41) and ECOG-PS (HR 2.40) maintained a prognostic impact., Discussion: First-line pembrolizumab outcomes in advanced high PD-L1 expression NSCLC patients could be negatively influenced by corticosteroid exposure or poor ECOG-PS., Competing Interests: The following authors declare potential conflicts of interest outside the submitted work: DI: Consultation Honoraria: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda. Speaker Honoraria: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda. Clinical Trials: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi. Research grant: AstraZeneca, BMS, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, GSK. AC 12th author: AstraZeneca, Advisory Board, Personal. Bayer, Other, Personal, Speaker honoraria. Boehringer Ingelheim, Advisory Board, Personal. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Advisory Board, Personal. Janssen, Advisory Board, Personal. Lilly, Advisory Board, Personal. Merck Sharp & Dohme, Advisory Board, Personal. Novartis, Advisory Board, Personal. Pfizer, Advisory Board, Personal. PharmaMar, Invited Speaker, Personal. Regeneron, Advisory Board, Personal. Roche, Advisory Board, Personal. Sanofi, Advisory Board, Personal. Takeda, Advisory Board, Personal. Merck Sharp & Dohme, Research Grant, Institutional, Financial interest, Drug-only for Investigator-initiated trial. PI: Advisory role and/or travel compensation: Bristol‐Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann, La Roche AG, MSD Oncology, Pfizer, Medscape, Astra Zeneca, Takeda, Amgen. JS-L: Astra Zeneca, Invited Speaker, Personal. Astra Zeneca, Advisory Board, Personal. BMS, Invited Speaker, Personal. BMS, Advisory Board, Personal. MSD, Invited Speaker, Personal. MSD, Advisory Board, Personal. Roche, Invited Speaker, Personal. Roche, Advisory board, Personal. Eisai, Invited Speaker, Personal. La Roche Posay, invited Speaker, Personal. AB: Astrazeneca advisory board and personal and invited speaker, BMS expert testimony and invited speaker, MSD invited speaker, Novartis invited speaker, Pfizer invited speaker, Personal, Piere Fabre invited speaker, Roche invited speaker and advisory board, Sanofy advisory board and invited speakerBMS, Principal Investigator, Clinical Trial CA224-1044. Pfizer, Principal Investigator, Clinical Trial C4221016. EA: Consultant or Advisory Role: MSD, Bristol-Myers, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Takeda. Speaking: MSD, Bristol-Myers, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Takeda. Co-founder: Trialing Health S.L. MC: Consultant or Advisory Role: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Takeda, Phyzer, Kyowa, Sanofi,Jansen. Speaking: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Takeda, Kyowa, Pierre-fabre, Novocure, Sanofi, Jansen. MF: AstraZeneca, Invited Speaker, Personal. BMS, Invited Speaker, Personal. BMS, Advisory Board, Personal. Janssen, Invited Speaker, Personal. Janssen, Advisory Board, Personal. Pfizer, Invited Speaker, Personal. RG-C: Astra Zeneca, Invited Speaker, Personal; Astra Zeneca, Advisory Board, Personal; BMS, Invited Speaker, Personal; BMS, Advisory Board, Personal; Jansen, Advisory Board, Personal; Jansen, Invited Speaker, Personal; lilly, Invited Speaker, Personal; lilly, Advisory Board, Personal; MSD, Advisory Board, Personal; novartis, Invited Speaker, Personal; novartis, Advisory Board, Personal; pfizer, Invited Speaker, Personal; pfizer, Advisory Board, Personal; roche, Invited Speaker, Personal; roche, Advisory Board, Personal; Sanofi, Advisory Board, Personal; Takeda, Advisory Board, Personal; Takeda, Invited Speaker, Personal; Astra Zeneca, Steering Committee Member, Personal, Financial interest; Jansen, Steering Committee Member, Personal, Financial interest. EF: Personal honoraria for advisory board participation from Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genmab, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, Turning Point, Daiichi Sankyo; personal speaker honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, Janssen, Medical Trends, Medscape, Merck Serono, MSD, Peervoice, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, Touch Oncology; Board of Director role: Grifols; financial support for meeting attendance and/or travel from AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche. MM: Advisory Board,consulting fees or sspeakin honoraria: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Helsinn Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Immedica, Beigene, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Takeda, Sanofi, Janssen, Amgen, Cassen. Research funding institution: Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Travel and accommodation support: AstraZeneca, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Pfizer, MSD. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Piedra, Martínez-Recio, Hernández, Morán, Arriola, Recuero-Borau, Cobo, Cordeiro, Mosquera, Fernández, García-Campelo, Calles, Álvarez, Zapata-García, Isla, Callejo, Iranzo, Serra-López, Barba, Sullivan, Felip and Majem.)

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of sentinel lymph node (SLN) in addition to lymphadenectomy was associated with survival benefit in patients with early-stage cervical cancer., Methods: International, multicenter, retrospective study., Inclusion Criteria: cervical cancer treated between 01/2007 and 12/2016 by surgery only; squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, FIGO 2009 stage IB1-IIA2, negative surgical margins, and laparotomy approach. Patients undergoing neo-adjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment and/or with positive para-aortic lymph nodes, were excluded. Women with positive pelvic nodes who refused adjuvant treatment, were included. Lymph node assessment was performed by SLN (with ultrastaging protocol) plus pelvic lymphadenectomy ('SLN' group) or pelvic lymphadenectomy alone ('non-SLN' group)., Results: 1083 patients were included: 300 (27.7 %) in SLN and 783 (72.3 %) in non-SLN group. 77 (7.1 %) patients had recurrence (N = 11, 3.7 % SLN versus N = 66, 8.4 % non-SLN, p = 0.005) and 34 (3.1 %) (N = 4, 1.3 % SLN versus N = 30, 3.8 % non-SLN, p = 0.033) died. SLN group had better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (96.0 %,95 %CI:93.5-98.5 versus 92.0 %,95 %CI:90.0-94.0; p = 0.024). No 5-year overall survival (OS) difference was shown (98.4 %,95 %CI:96.8-99.9 versus 96.8 %,95 %CI:95.4-98.2; p = 0.160). SLN biopsy and lower stage were independent factors associated with improved DFS (HR:0.505,95 %CI:0.266-0.959, p = 0.037 and HR:2.703,95 %CI:1.389-5.261, p = 0.003, respectively). Incidence of pelvic central recurrences was higher in the non-SLN group (1.7 % versus 4.5 %, p = 0.039)., Conclusion: Adding SLN biopsy to pelvic lymphadenectomy was associated with lower recurrence and death rate and improved 5-year DFS. This might be explained by the lower rate of missed nodal metastasis thanks to the use of SLN ultrastaging. SLN biopsy should be recommended in patients with early-stage cervical cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Abu-Rustum received research funding paid to the institution from GRAIL. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center also has equity in GRAIL. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival between open and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with participants followed for 4.5 years. The primary objective was to evaluate whether minimally invasive surgery was noninferior in disease-free survival (DFS) to abdominal radical hysterectomy. Secondary outcomes included overall survival. Sample size was based on DFS of 90% at 4.5 years and 7.2% noninferiority margin for minimally invasive surgery. A total of 631 patients were enrolled: 319 assigned to minimally invasive and 312 to open surgery. Of these, 289 (90.6%) patients underwent minimally invasive surgery and 274 (87.8%) patients open surgery. At 4.5 years, DFS was 85.0% in the minimally invasive group and 96% in the open group (difference of -11.1; 95% CI, -15.8 to -6.3; P = .95 for noninferiority). Minimally invasive surgery was associated with lower rate of DFS compared with open surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 3.91 [95% CI, 2.02 to 7.58]; P < .001). Rate of overall survival at 4.5 years was 90.6% versus 96.2% for the minimally invasive and open surgery groups, respectively (HR for death of any cause = 2.71 [95% CI, 1.32 to 5.59]; P = .007). Given higher recurrence rate and worse overall survival with minimally invasive surgery, an open approach should be standard of care.

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has changed the therapeutic paradigm of lung cancer (LC), becoming the standard of treatment for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without actionable mutations. It has allowed the achievement of durable responses and resulted in significant survival benefits. However, not all patients respond; hence, molecular biomarkers are needed to help us predict which patients will respond. With this objective, a prospective observational study was designed, including a cohort of 55 patients with NSCLC who received ICIs. We studied whether biomarkers such as TCRβ and specific cytokines involved in the regulation of T cell activity were related to the immunotherapy response. In the survival analysis, it was found that patients with higher TCRβ clonality, lower TCRβ evenness, higher TCRβ Shannon diversity and lower TCRβ convergence had higher overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). However, no statistically significant association was observed. Regarding cytokines, those patients with higher levels of IL-2 and IL-15 presented statistically significantly shorter OS and PFS, respectively. In fact, in the multivariable analysis, the high IL-15 level increased the risk of death by three times. Although the sample size was small and more studies are needed to confirm our results, our study reveals promising markers of responses to ICIs.

The use of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as lorlatinib, for the treatment of patients with ALK gene rearrangement (or ALK-positive) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been shown to improve the overall survival and quality of life of these patients. However, lorlatinib is not exempt from potential adverse events. Adequate monitoring and management of these adverse events are critical for increasing patient adherence to lorlatinib, thereby maximizing the benefits of treatment and minimizing the risks associated with treatment discontinuation. Considering that the adverse events of lorlatinib can affect different organs and systems, the participation of a multidisciplinary team, including cardiologists, neurologists, internal medicine specialists, and oncology pharmacists, is needed. This article presents specific and pragmatic strategies for identifying and treating the most relevant adverse events associated with lorlatinib in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC based on the clinical experience of a multidisciplinary panel of experts., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Transcriptomic subtyping holds promise for personalized therapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). In this study, we aimed to assess intratumoral transcriptomic subtype diversity and to identify biomarkers of long-term chemoimmunotherapy benefit in human ES-SCLC., Experimental Design: We analyzed tumor samples from 58 patients with ES-SCLC enrolled in two multicenter single-arm phase IIIb studies evaluating frontline chemoimmunotherapy in Spain: n = 32 from the IMfirst trial and n = 26 from the CANTABRICO trial. We used the GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiler system to perform multi-region transcriptomic analysis. For subtype classification, we performed hierarchical clustering using the relative expression of ASCL1 (SCLC-A), NEUROD1 (SCLC-N), POU2F3 (SCLC-P), and YAP1 (SCLC-Y)., Results: Subtype distribution was found to be similar between bothcohorts, except for SCLC-P, which was not identified in the CANTABRICO&#95;DSP cohort. A total of 44% of the patients in both cohorts had tumors with multiple coexisting transcriptional subtypes. Transcriptional subtypes or subtype heterogeneity was not associated with outcomes. Most potential targets did not show subtype-specific expression. Consistently in both cohorts, tumors from patients with long-term benefit (time to progression ≥12 months) contained an IFNγ-dominated mRNA profile, including enhanced capacity for antigen presentation. Hypoxia and glycolytic pathways were associated with resistance to chemoimmunotherapy., Conclusions: This work suggests that intratumoral heterogeneity, inconsistent association with outcome, and unclear subtype-specific target expression might be significant challenges for subtype-based precision oncology in SCLC. Preexisting IFNγ-driven immunity and mitochondrial metabolism seem to be correlates of long-term efficacy in this study, although the absence of a chemotherapy control arm precludes concluding that these are predictive features specific for immunotherapy., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Lung cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with its high mortality rate attributed mainly to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has revolutionized its treatment, patient response is highly variable and lacking predictive markers. We conducted a prospective study on 55 patients with NSCLC undergoing ICI therapy to identify predictive markers of both response and immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) in the airway microbiota. We also analyzed the clinical evolution and overall survival (OS) with respect to treatments that affect the integrity of the microbiota, such as antibiotics and corticosteroids. Our results demonstrated that respiratory microbiota differ significantly in ICI responders: they have higher alpha diversity values and lower abundance of the Firmicutes phylum and the Streptococcus genus. Employing a logistic regression model, the abundance of Gemella was the major predictor of non-ICI response, whereas Lachnoanaerobaculum was the best predictor of a positive response to ICI. The most relevant results were that antibiotic consumption is linked to a lower ICI response, and the use of corticosteroids correlated with poorer overall survival. Whereas previous studies have focused on gut microbiota, our findings highlight the importance of the respiratory microbiota in predicting the treatment response. Future research should explore microbiota modulation strategies to enhance immunotherapy outcomes. Understanding the impact of antibiotics, corticosteroids, and microbiota on NSCLC immunotherapy will help personalize treatment and improve patient outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Objectives: The S-REAL study aimed to assess the effectiveness of durvalumab as consolidation therapy after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in a real-world cohort of patients with locally advanced, unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) included in a Spanish early access program (EAP)., Methods: In this multicentre, observational, retrospective study we analysed data from patients treated in 39 Spanish hospitals, who started intravenous durvalumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) between September 2017 and December 2018. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included patient characterization and adverse events of special interest (AESI)., Results: A total of 244 patients were followed up for a median of 21.9 months [range 1.2-34.7]. Median duration of durvalumab was 45.5 weeks (11.4 months) [0-145]. Median PFS was 16.7 months (95% CI 12.2-25). No remarkable differences in PFS were observed between patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% or < 1% (16.7 versus 15.6 months, respectively). However, PFS was higher in patients who had received prior concurrent CRT (cCRT) versus sequential CRT (sCRT) (20.6 versus 9.4 months). AESIs leading to durvalumab discontinuation were registered in 11.1% of patients., Conclusions: These results are in line with prior published evidence and confirm the benefits of durvalumab in the treatment of LA-NSCLC patients in a real-world setting. We also observed a lower incidence of important treatment-associated toxicities, such as pneumonitis, compared with the pivotal phase III PACIFIC clinical study., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).)

Introduction: Cervical cancer is a public health problem in our country and worldwide. Less than 25% of cases are diagnosed in the early stages, where survival is more remarkable than 90% at five years. Here, we review surgical treatment in the early stages of cervical cancer., Methodology: A literature review was carried out in the MEDLINE database. The search was mainly limited to the English language, with priority given to systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis and randomized studies. However, only retrospective or observational evidence was found for some topics., Results: The standard treatment for early-stage cervical cancer is hysterectomy, and its radical nature will depend on the tumor size, lymphovascular permeation, and tumor-specific prognostic factors. Furthermore, the type of surgery (hysterectomy or trachelectomy) will rely on the patient's desire to preserve fertility. Nodal evaluation is indicated as part of the treatment from stage IAI with PLV. However, the sentinel lymph node is more relevant in the treatment. The incidental finding of cervical cancer after a hysterectomy requires a multidisciplinary evaluation to determine the therapeutic approach. Less radical surgery has been described as oncologically safe in low-risk groups., Conclusion: Surgical treatment in its early stages has evolved in recent decades, making it more individualized and seeking less morbidity in patients without compromising their survival., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Nájera-Muñoz, Hernández-Romero, Isla-Ortiz and Salcedo-Hernández.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been proposed as the standard first-line and subsequent treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study analyzed whether patients with good lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) have a better response to ICIs and the relationship between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and response in clinical practice., Methods: This was an observational, retrospective, single-center study. Patients with stage IV NSCLC between 2016 and 2021 were included in the study. Toxicity was assessed according to The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Response assessment was performed according to RECIST 2.0 and immuno-related criteria. Descriptive and survival analyses were conducted. Degree of toxicity and response to treatment (based on treatment and histology) were assessed. LIPI and response were assessed. LIPI included dNLR (absolute neutrophil count/(white blood cell count - absolute neutrophil count)) ≥ 3 and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) greater than the upper limit of normal. Patients were stratified into good (G), intermediate (I), and poor (P) prognostic groups., Results: A total of 168 patients were included (130 men and 38 women, mean age 64.3 years). ICI use in the first- or second-line treatment was 65% and 35%, respectively. Fifteen (9%) patients showed complete response (CR), 50 (30%) showed partial response (PR), 39 (22%) had stable disease (SD), 45 (28%) had progressive disease (PD), and 19 (11%) were not evaluated (NE). Patients with good prognostic LIPI (dNLR < 3 and normal LDH levels) showed a better response. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 19 months in G, 6 months in I, and 2 months in P. Overall survival (OS) was 27 months in G, 8 months in I, and 3 months in P. One hundred fourteen patients died (56% G, 76% I, 93% P). Patients with adenocarcinoma were 116 (77 with irAEs G1-4 (13 CR, 31 PR, 21 SD, eight PD, and four NE)), and without were 39 (three PR, six SD, 21 PD, and nine NE). Fifty-two patients had squamous carcinoma (27 with irAEs G1-4 (two CR, 12 PR, nine SD, and four PD)), and 25 did not (four PR, three SD, 12 PD, and six NE)). IrAEs appearance was observed in longer PFS (19 vs. 2 months) and OS (27 vs. 4 months; P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: LIPI was a positive predictor of response to ICI. The presence of irAEs is associated with a better immune response. In contrast, the absence of toxicity predicted a worse prognosis., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright 2024, Moratiel Pellitero et al.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been proposed as the standard treatment for different stages of non-small-cell lung cancer in multiple indications. Not all patients benefit from these treatments, however, and certain patients develop immune-related adverse events. Although the search for predictors of response to these drugs is a major field of research, these issues have yet to be resolved. It has been postulated that microbiota could play a relevant role in conditioning the response to cancer treatments; however, the human factor of intestinal permeability also needs to be considered as it is closely related to the regulation of host-microbiota interaction. In this article, we analyzed the possible relationship between the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors and the onset of immune-related adverse events, gut microbiota status, and intestinal membrane permeability. In a pioneering step, we also measured short-chain fatty acid content in feces. Although the correlation analyses failed to identify predictive biomarkers, even when all variables were integrated, our patients' microbial gut ecosystems were rich and diverse, and the intestinal barrier's integrity was preserved. These results add new knowledge on the composition of microbiota and its correlation with barrier permeability and short-chain fatty acids and suggest that more studies are required before these potential biomarkers can be incorporated into the clinical management of patients via immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Inherited mutations in the CHEK2 gene have been associated with an increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer (BC). We aim to identify in the study population the prevalence of mutations in the CHEK2 gene in diagnosed BC patients, evaluate the phenotypic characteristics of the tumor and family history, and predict the deleteriousness of the variants of uncertain significance (VUS). A genetic study was performed, from May 2016 to April 2020, in 396 patients diagnosed with BC at the University Hospital Lozano Blesa of Zaragoza, Spain. Patients with a genetic variant in the CHEK2 gene were selected for the study. We performed a descriptive analysis of the clinical variables, a bibliographic review of the variants, and a cosegregation study when possible. Moreover, an in-depth bioinformatics analysis of CHEK2 VUS was carried out. We identified nine genetic variants in the CHEK2 gene in 10 patients (two pathogenic variants and seven VUS). This supposes a prevalence of 0.75% and 1.77%, respectively. In all cases, there was a family history of BC in first- and/or second-degree relatives. We carried out a cosegregation study in two families, being positive in one of them. The bioinformatics analyses predicted the pathogenicity of six of the VUS. In conclusion, CHEK2 mutations have been associated with an increased risk for BC. This risk is well-established for foundation variants. However, the risk assessment for other variants is unclear. The incorporation of bioinformatics analysis provided supporting evidence of the pathogenicity of VUS., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Alonso, Menao, Lastra, Arruebo, Bueso, Pérez, Murillo, Álvarez, Alonso, Rebollar, Cruellas, Arribas, Ramos, Isla, Galano-Frutos, García-Cebollada, Sancho and Andrés.)

The incidence and mortality of lung cancer in women are rising, with both increasing by 124% between 2003 and 2019. The main risk factor for lung cancer is tobacco use, but indoor radon gas exposure is one of the leading causes in nonsmokers. The most recent evidence demonstrates that multiple factors can make women more susceptible to harm from these risk factors or carcinogens. For this consensus statement, the Association for Lung Cancer Research in Women (ICAPEM) invited a group of lung cancer experts to perform a detailed gender-based analysis of lung cancer. Clinically, female patients have different lung cancer profiles, and most actionable driver alterations are more prevalent in women, particularly in never-smokers. Additionally, the impact of certain therapies seems to be different. In the future, it will be necessary to carry out specific studies to improve the understanding of the role of certain biomarkers and gender in the prognosis and evolution of lung cancer., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).)

Objective: Liquid biopsy (LB) is a non-invasive technique to detect genetic alterations by next-generation sequencing (NGS) when tissue biopsy is not available. This study aims to estimate in the Spanish setting, the cost-effectiveness of using FoundationOne Liquid CDx (F1L CDx), a novel blood-derived LB test based on NGS, versus non-molecular diagnosis (non-mDx) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in whom tissue sampling is not feasible., Methods: A joint model was developed combining a decision-tree with partitioned survival models to calculate the costs and health outcomes over a lifetime horizon, comparing F1L CDx in LB versus non-mDx. Only direct costs (expressed in € of 2023) were included and a 3% discount rate for future costs and effects was considered. Health outcomes were expressed in Life Years (LYs) and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). Utilities and treatment efficacy were obtained from the literature. An expert panel of 11 Spanish oncologists determined the treatment allocation and validated all model inputs and assumptions. Several sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results., Results: In a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients, LB using F1L CDx would detect 386 alterations, so those patients could be treated with targeted therapies or enrolled in clinical trials. Cost-effectiveness results showed that F1L CDx provides greater effectiveness than non-mDx (+383.95 LYs and +305.94 QALYs), with an additional cost of €2,898,308. The incremental cost-utility ratio was €9,473/QALY gained. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the cost-effectiveness results., Limitations: Various limitations inherent to cost-effectiveness analyses were described., Conclusion: LB with F1L CDx test is a cost-effective strategy in Spain for patients with advanced NSCLC without tissue sample available for molecular diagnosis, improving the personalized treatment of these patients.

Background: Malignant small bowel obstruction has a poor prognosis and is associated with multiple related symptoms. The optimal treatment approach is often unclear. We aimed to compare surgical versus non-surgical management with the aim to determine the optimal approach for managing malignant bowel obstruction., Methods: S1316 was a pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial done within the National Cancer Trials Network at 30 hospital and cancer research centres in the USA, Mexico, Peru, and Colombia. Participants had an intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal primary cancer confirmed via pathological report and malignant bowel disease; were aged 18 years or older with a Zubrod performance status 0-2 within 1 week before admission; had a surgical indication; and treatment equipoise. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to surgical or non-surgical treatment using a dynamic balancing algorithm, balancing on primary tumour type. Patients who declined consent for random assignment were offered a prospective observational patient choice pathway. The primary outcome was the number of days alive and out of the hospital (good days) at 91 days. Analyses were based on intention-to-treat linear, logistic, and Cox regression models combining data from both pathways and adjusting for potential confounders. Treatment complications were assessed in all analysed patients in the study. This completed study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02270450., Findings: From May 11, 2015, to April 27, 2020, 221 patients were enrolled (143 [65%] were female and 78 [35%] were male). There were 199 evaluable participants: 49 in the randomised pathway (24 surgery and 25 non-surgery) and 150 in the patient choice pathway (58 surgery and 92 non-surgery). No difference was seen between surgery and non-surgery for the primary outcome of good days: mean 42·6 days (SD 32·2) in the randomised surgery group, 43·9 days (29·5) in the randomised non-surgery group, 54·8 days (27·0) in the patient choice surgery group, and 52·7 days (30·7) in the patient choice non-surgery group (adjusted mean difference 2·9 additional good days in surgical versus non-surgical treatment [95% CI -5·5 to 11·3]; p=0·50). During their initial hospital stay, six participants died, five due to cancer progression (four patients from the randomised pathway, two in each treatment group, and one from the patient choice pathway, in the surgery group) and one due to malignant bowel obstruction treatment complications (patient choice pathway, non-surgery). The most common grade 3-4 malignant bowel obstruction treatment complication was anaemia (three [6%] patients in the randomised pathway, all in the surgical group, and five [3%] patients in the patient choice pathway, four in the surgical group and one in the non-surgical group)., Interpretation: In our study, whether patients received a surgical or non-surgical treatment approach did not influence good days during the first 91 days after registration. These findings should inform treatment decisions for patients hospitalised with malignant bowel obstruction., Funding: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Cancer Institute., Translation: For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests GLA received payments to Fred Hutch for support for the present manuscript. AAS has grants or contracts from AbbVie, Aravive, AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Ingelheim, Clovis, Eisai, Ellipses, Immunogen, Merck, Oncoquest, Roche/Genentech, SeagenInc, TapImmune, Tesaro/GSK, VBL Therapeutics, and National Cancer Trial Network; has received honoraria for educational presentations or lectures from @Point of Care, Clinical Care Optios, Curio Science, Peerview, Bio ASCEND, RTP, and GOG Foundation; has received honorarium from Myriad; and has received support for attending meetings or travel from GOG, Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and NRG. DCF received support for the present manuscript in the form of payments through S1316 to Valley Health for patient enrolment; received payment or honoraria for lectures from Intuitive for the resident lecture programme; and has stock options in Intuitive. JDW has grants or contracts from Merck; receives royalties or licenses from UptoDate; receives payments for expert testimony from Medicolegal for consulting on gynaecological cancer; is a journal editor for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. BFa received visiting professor honoraria in April, 2022, at the Ohio State University Department of Surgery, October, 2021, at the University of Nebraska Department of Surgery, and December, 2020, at the University of Tennessee Department of Surgery; and has stock or stock options in Align Tech, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, DexCom, Editas Medicine, Fulgent Genetics, GoodRx Holdings, Guardant Health, Globus Medical, Healthequity, HCA Healthcare, IDEXX Laboratories, Illumina, Intuitive Surgical, Invitae, Masimo, Moderna, Neurocrine Bioscience, Novocure, Quidel, Repligen, Seagen, Shockwave Medical, STAAR Surgical, UnitedHealth Group, Veeva Systems, Teladoc Health, and ResMed. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hospital readmission is a quality metric of hospital care and has been studied in ovarian carcinoma, but its evaluation has several limitations. Also, emergency room (ER) readmission is considered an adverse effect because it represents patient costs. Therefore, our objective was to determine the rate of ER readmission, its causes, and associated factors., Methods: A retrospective study of 592 patients with ovarian carcinoma who underwent upfront surgery, neoadjuvant therapy, or surgery for recurrent disease. An analysis of factors associated with ER readmission, hospital readmission, and surgical complications was performed, including multivariate analysis to assess for case-mix factors., Results: Of 592 patients, the median age was 51 years, and the predominant type of treatment was the neoadjuvant approach (52.9%); 46% underwent upfront surgeries and six surgeries for recurrence. The ratio to ER readmission was 11.8% (70 patients), of whom 12 patients were admitted more than once. The factors associated with ER readmission were prolonged surgery, intraoperative bleeding, extended hospital stay, the time of the day when the surgery was performed, and post-surgical complications. The hospital readmissions were 4.2%, and the overall morbidity was 17.6%. In the multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with ER readmission was the presence of surgical complications (OR = 39.01). The factors independently associated with hospital readmission were the entrance to the intensive care unit (OR = 1.37), the presence of surgical complications (OR = 2.85), and ER readmission (OR = 1.45)., Conclusion: ER readmission is an adverse event representing the presence of symptoms/complications in patients. Evaluating the ER readmission independently of the readmission to the hospital is critical because it will allow modifying medical care behaviors to prevent patients from unnecessarily returning to the hospital after a hospital discharge to manage preventable medical problems., Trial Registration: researchregistry7882., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: There are currently three first-line immunotherapy options used as monotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with high programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (≥50%). This manuscript aims to evaluate the available data on atezolizumab (AT), cemiplimab (CEMI), and pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) and to study the results obtained during pivotal trials, especially regarding patient subgroups., Methods: Nominal group and Delphi techniques were used. Eight Spanish experts in lung cancer (the scientific committee of the project) analyzed the use of immunotherapy monotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression. The expert scientific committee formulated several statements based on a scientific review and their own clinical experience. Subsequently, 17 additional Spanish lung cancer experts were selected to appraise the committee's statements through two Delphi rounds. They completed a Delphi round via an online platform and voted according to a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree). The statements were approved if ≥70% of experts voted 7 or more., Results: A total of 20 statements were proposed covering the following areas: (1) general characteristics of pivotal clinical trials; (2) overall main outcomes of pivotal clinical trials; and (3) subgroup analysis. All statements reached consensus in the first round., Conclusions: AT, CEMI, and PEMBRO as monotherapy can be considered the standard of care in patients with advanced NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression (≥50%). Moreover, some differences noted among the drugs analyzed in this document might facilitate treatment decision-making, especially in clinically relevant patient subgroups, when using PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The high level of agreement reached among experts supports the proposed statements.

Background: The present study assesses the time intervals from symptom discovery to treatment start and describes the health service use experiences of uninsured patients with cancer of the breast, cervix uteri, testicle, and prostate before their arrival to the cancer hospital., Methods: This cross-sectional study included 1468 patients who were diagnosed between June 2016 and May 2017 and received treatment for the selected cancers in two of the largest public cancer hospitals in Mexico City, financed through Seguro Popular. Data was collected through a survey administered via face-to-face interviews with patients and a review of their medical files., Results: The median time between detection (symptom discovery or first abnormal screening test) and treatment start was 6.6 months. For all types of cancer, the longest interval was the diagnostic interval -between the first use of healthcare services and the confirmation of cancer. Less than 20% cancer patients were diagnosed in the earliest stages that are associated with the best chances of long-term survival. The participants described a high use of private services for their first consultation, the use of several different types of health services and multiple consultations before arrival to the cancer centers, and 35% perceived being misdiagnosed by the first doctor they consulted., Conclusions: Most cancer patients treated in the two largest public institutions available for the uninsured faced long delays to get diagnosed and started treatment at advanced stages. Strengthening quality and access for effective early cancer diagnosis and treatment is key to improve patient outcomes in low and middle-income settings., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents the greatest number of identified therapeutic targets, some of which have therapeutic utility. Currently, detecting EGFR, BRAF, KRAS and MET mutations, ALK, ROS1, NTRK and RET translocations, and PD-L1 expression in these patients is considered essential. The use of next-generation sequencing facilitates precise molecular diagnosis and allows the detection of other emerging mutations, such as the HER2 mutation and predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy responses. In this consensus, a group of experts in the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC selected by the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology have evaluated currently available information and propose a series of recommendations to optimize the detection and use of biomarkers in daily clinical practice., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

To describe access to complete treatment in women with cervical cancer and state-sponsored insurance versus no insurance. We conducted a retrospective observational study. The source population consisted of women treated for cervical cancer from January 2000 to December 2015 in a tertiary care hospital. We included 411 women with state-sponsored insurance and 400 without insurance. We defined access to cervical cancer treatment as complete treatment (according NCCN/ESMO (National Comprehensive Cancer Network/European Society for Medical Oncology) standards) and timely initiation of treatment (less than 4 weeks). Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were described and analyzed with logistic regression using complete treatment as the main outcome. A total of 811 subjects were included, the median age was 46 (IQR (Interquartile range) 42-50) years. Most of them were married (36.1%), unemployed (50.4%), and had completed primary school (44.0%). The most common clinical stages at diagnosis were II (38.2%) and III (24.7%). In the adjusted regression model, being married (OR (odds ratio): 4.3, 95% CI (confidence interval): 1.74-10.61) and having paid employment (OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.59-4.90) or state-sponsored insurance (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.04-2.26) were positively associated with the possibility of having a complete treatment. Women with insurance were likely to be younger and receive timely treatment compared with uninsured women. Complete treatment was associated to insurance status and advanced stages of cervical cancer. State-sponsored insurance improves access to complete treatment. Government policies are needed to avoid social and economic inequity and provide better management of cervical cancer in our country., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the preventive services for cervical cancer (CC) control programs in Mexico, which will result in increased mortality. This study aims to assess the impact of the pandemic on the interruption of three preventive actions in the CC prevention program in Mexico., Methods: This study is a retrospective time series analysis based on administrative records for the uninsured population served by the Mexican Ministry of Health. Patient data were retrieved from the outpatient service information system and the hospital discharge database for the period 2017-2021. Data were aggregated by month, distinguishing a pre-pandemic and a pandemic period, considering April 2020 as the start date of the pandemic. A Poisson time series analysis was used to model seasonal and secular trends. Five process indicators were selected to assess the disruption of the CC program, these were analyzed as monthly data (N=39 pre-pandemic, N=21 during the pandemic). HPV vaccination indicators (number of doses and coverage) and diagnostic characteristics of CC cases were analyzed descriptively. The time elapsed between diagnosis and treatment initiation in CC cases was modeled using restricted cubic splines from robust regression., Results: Annual HPV vaccination coverage declined dramatically after 2019 and was almost null in 2021. The number of positive Papanicolaou smears decreased by 67.8% (90%CI: -72.3, -61.7) in April-December 2020, compared to their expected values without the pandemic. The immediate pandemic shock (April 2020) in the number of first-time and recurrent colposcopies was -80.5% (95%CI:-83.5, -77.0) and -77.9% (95%CI: -81.0, -74.4), respectively. An increasing trend was observed in the proportion of advanced stage and metastatic CC cases. The fraction of CC cases that did not receive medical treatment or surgery increased, as well as CC cases that received late treatment after diagnosis., Conclusions: Our analyses show significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic with declines at all levels of CC prevention and increasing inequalities. The restarting of the preventive programs against CC in Mexico offers an opportunity to put in place actions to reduce the disparities in the burden of disease between socioeconomic levels., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Cruz-Valdez, Palacio-Mejía, Quezada-Sánchez, Hernández-Ávila, Galicia-Carmona, Cetina-Pérez, Arango-Bravo, Isla-Ortiz, Aranda-Flores, Uscanga-Sánchez, Madrid-Marina and Torres-Poveda.)

Background: Atezolizumab has recently been approved for first-line treatment of high PD-L1 expression metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with no EGFR or ALK mutations, on the basis of the IMpower110 trial. This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab compared with pembrolizumab among these patients in Spanish settings, based on the results of the two cut-offs of the IMpower110 study., Methods: A three-state partitioned-survival model was adapted to Spanish settings to calculate health outcomes and costs over a lifetime horizon. Clinical data for atezolizumab were collected from the interim and the exploratory results (data cut-off: Sept'18 and Feb'20, respectively) of the IMpower110 trial while a network meta-analysis was used to model pembrolizumab treatment. Utility data were collected from the trial. Direct medical costs were considered based on resources identified by experts. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per year. Health outcomes were expressed as cost per Life Year (LY) and cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY). Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of results., Results: Over a lifetime horizon, the incremental results showed that atezolizumab generated similar health outcomes (LYs and QALYs) to pembrolizumab, with minimal differences depending on the cut-off used (+ 0.70 and + 0.42 LYs and QALYs with Sept'18 cut-off and - 0.80 and - 0.72 LYs and QALYs with Feb'20 cut-off). However, for both cut-offs, atezolizumab produced meaningfully less costs than pembrolizumab (€ - 54,261 with Sept'18 cut-off and € - 81,907 with Feb'20 cut-off). The sensitivity analyses carried out confirmed the robustness of the base-case results., Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing the two cut-off of IMpower110, shows that atezolizumab provides similar health gains to pembrolizumab but at a lower cost for the first-line treatment of metastasic NSCLC patients in Spain., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The PMS2 gene is involved in DNA repair by the mismatch repair pathway. Deficiencies in this mechanism have been associated with Lynch Syndrome (LS), which is characterized by a high risk for colorectal, endometrial, ovarian, breast, and other cancers. Germinal pathogenic variants of PMS2 are associated with up to 5% of all cases of LS. The prevalence is overestimated for the existence of multiple homologous pseudogenes. We report the case of a 44-year-old woman diagnosed with breast cancer at 34 years without a relevant cancer family history. The presence of pathogenic variant NM&#95;000535.7:c.1A > T, (p.Met1Leu) in PMS2 was determined by next-generation sequencing analysis with a panel of 322 cancer-associated genes and confirmed by capillary sequencing in the patient. The variant was determined in six family members (brothers, sisters, and a son) and seven non-cancerous unrelated individuals. Analysis of the amplified region showed high homology of PMS2 with five of its pseudogenes. We determined that the variant is associated with the PMS2P1 pseudogene following sequence alignment analysis. We propose considering the variant c.1A > T, (p.Met1Leu) in PMS2 for reclassification as not hereditary cancer-related, given the impact on the diagnosis and treatment of cancer patients and families carrying this variant.

(1) Despite the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lung cancer, there is a lack of knowledge about predictive biomarkers. The objective of our study is to analyze different subsets of T-lymphocytes and natural killer (NK) cells as predictive biomarkers in a cohort of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with ICI. (2) This is an observational, prospective study with 55 NSCLC patients treated with ICI. A total of 43 T and NK cell subsets are analyzed in peripheral blood, including the main markers of exhaustion, differentiation, memory, activation, and inhibition. (3) Regarding the descriptive data, Granzyme B+CD4+ Treg lymphocytes stand out (median 17.4%), and within the NK populations, most patients presented cytotoxic NK cells (CD56+CD3-CD16+GranzymeB+; median 94.8%), and about half of them have highly differentiated adaptive-like NK cells (CD56+CD3-CD16+CD57+ (mean 59.8%). A statistically significant difference was observed between the expression of PD1 within the CD56 bright NK cell subpopulation (CD56+CD3-CD16-PD-1+) ( p = 0.047) and a better OS. (4) Circulating immune cell subpopulations are promising prognostic biomarkers for ICI. Pending on validation with a larger sample, here we provide an analysis of the major circulating T and NK cell subsets involved in cancer immunity, with promising results despite a small sample size.

Purpose: This Delphi panel study assessed the level of consensus between medical oncologists on the clinical management of patients with early-stage EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: A modified two-round Delphi approach was used. A scientific committee comprised of medical oncologists developed an online questionnaire. Delphi panel experts rated their level of agreement with each questionnaire statement on a 9-point Likert scale. The questionnaire included 36 statements from 3 domains (clinical management of early-stage NSCLC: 15 statements; role of adjuvant therapy in early-stage NSCLC: 9 statements; and role of adjuvant therapy in early-stage NSCLC with sensitizing EGFR mutation: 12 statements)., Results: In round 1, consensus was reached for 24/36 statements (66.7%). Nine statements that did not achieve consensus after the first round were evaluated in round 2, and none of them reached consensus. Overall, 84.4% of the panelists agreed that EGFR mutation testing should be done after surgery. Consensus was not achieved on whether the implementation of EGFR mutation testing in resected early-stage NSCLC could limit the use of adjuvant osimertinib. The panelists recognized the rationale for the use of osimertinib in the adjuvant scenario (88%) and 72% agreed that it may change the treatment paradigm in stage IB-IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Consensus was not reached on the inconvenience of prolonged duration of osimertinib., Conclusions: This Delphi study provides valuable insights into relevant questions in the management of early-stage EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, specific issues remain unresolved. The expert consensus emphasizes the role of adjuvant treatment with osimertinib in this scenario., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Pembrolizumab is a standard-of-care for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage IB-IIIA NSCLC., Methods: In this randomised, triple-blind, phase 3 trial (PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091), patients were recruited from 196 medical centres in 29 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with completely resected, pathologically confirmed stage IB (tumours of ≥4 cm in diameter), II, or IIIA NSCLC per the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (7th edition) of any histology or PD-L1 expression level, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; adjuvant chemotherapy was to be considered for stage IB disease and was strongly recommended for stage II and IIIA disease, according to national and local guidelines. Using a central interactive voice-response system, eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a minimisation technique and stratified by disease stage, previous adjuvant chemotherapy, PD-L1 expression, and geographical region, to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, both administered intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 18 cycles. Participants, investigators, and analysts were masked to treatment assignment. Dual primary endpoints were disease-free survival in the overall population and in the population with PD-L1 tumour proportion score (TPS) of 50% or greater. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all participants randomly assigned to a treatment group). Safety was assessed in all participants randomly assigned to treatment who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here we report results of the second interim analysis, prespecified to occur when approximately 118 disease-free survival events had occurred in the PD-L1 TPS of 50% or greater population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02504372, and is active but not recruiting., Findings: Between Jan 20, 2016, and May 6, 2020, 1177 (60%) of 1955 screened participants were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n=590, including n=168 with PD-L1 TPS of ≥50%) or placebo (n=587; including n=165 with PD-L1 TPS of ≥50%) and included in the ITT population. Median follow-up as of data cutoff (Sept 20, 2021) for this interim analysis was 35·6 months (IQR 27·1-45·5). In the overall population, median disease-free survival was 53·6 months (95% CI 39·2 to not reached) in the pembrolizumab group versus 42·0 months (31·3 to not reached) in the placebo group (HR 0·76 [95% CI 0·63-0·91], p=0·0014). In the PD-L1 TPS of 50% or greater population, median disease-free survival was not reached in either the pembrolizumab group (95% CI 44·3 to not reached) or the placebo group (95% CI 35·8 to not reached; HR 0·82 [95% CI 0·57-1·18]; p=0·14). Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 198 (34%) of 580 participants who received pembrolizumab and 150 (26%) of 581 participants who received placebo. Grade 3 or worse events that occurred in at least ten participants in either treatment group were hypertension (35 [6%]) and pneumonia (12 [2%]) with pembrolizumab and hypertension (32 [6%]) with placebo. Serious adverse events occurred in 142 (24%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and 90 (15%) in the placebo group; serious adverse events that occurred in more than 1% of participants were pneumonia (13 [2%]), pneumonitis (12 [2%]), and diarrhoea (seven [1%]) with pembrolizumab and pneumonia (nine [2%]) with placebo. Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four (1%) participants treated with pembrolizumab (one due to both cardiogenic shock and myocarditis, one due to both septic shock and myocarditis, one due to pneumonia, and one due to sudden death) and in no participants treated with placebo., Interpretation: Pembrolizumab significantly improved disease-free survival compared with placebo and was not associated with new safety signals in completely resected, PD-L1-unselected, stage IB-IIIA NSCLC. Pembrolizumab is potentially a new treatment option for stage IB-IIIA NSCLC after complete resection and, when recommended, adjuvant chemotherapy, regardless of PD-L1 expression., Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MO, LP-A, SM, UD, KO, LH, EE, DI, AM-M, MF, MT, J-SL, KN, MM, NJ, RS, BB, and SP report funding to their institutions from Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co (Rahway, NJ, USA; MSD) to support conduct of this study. All authors received medical writing support for the preparation of this manuscript from MSD. MO additionally reports consulting fees for serving on advisory boards for MSD, Merck, Pierre Fabre, Amgen, Puma, Iteos, and PharmaMar; honoraria from Roche and Lilly in China; travel support from MSD; payment for serving as a member of an independent data monitoring committee for PharmaMar; and payment from ALPI (Sweden) for an academic review. LP-A additionally reports institutional grants or contracts from MSD, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS); consulting fees from Lilly, MSD, Roche, PharmaMar, Merck, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Servier, Amgen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Bayer, BMS, Mirati, GSK, Janssen, and Takeda; honoraria from AstraZeneca, Janssen, Merck, and Mirati; participation on a data safety monitoring board for Altum Sequencing and Genomica; and serving as a principal investigator on trials for Alkermes, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, IO Biotech, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and Tesaro. UD additionally reports consulting fees from Roche. KO additionally reports institutional grants or contracts from Pfizer and Takeda; consulting fees from Amgen, Takeda, MSD, Janssen, Roche, and AstraZeneca; and travel support from MSD. DI additionally reports consulting fees from MSD, Roche, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Bayer, BMS, GSK, Janssen, and Takeda; honoraria from MSD, Roche, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Bayer, BMS, and Takeda; and travel support from AstraZeneca. AM-M additionally reports consulting fees for advisory board membership from AstraZeneca/MedImmune, BMS, F Hoffmann-La Roche AG, MSD, and Pfizer; honoraria from AstraZeneca/MedImmune, BMS, F Hoffmann-La Roche AG, MSD, and Pfizer; serving as a steering committee member for AstraZeneca/MedImmune; and travel support from AstraZeneca/MedImmune, BMS, F Hoffmann-La Roche AG, MSD, Pfizer, and Lilly. MF additionally reports honoraria from Roche and Sanofi; travel support from AstraZeneca; and serving as an advisory board member for MSD, Roche, and AstraZeneca. MT additionally reports institutional grants or contracts from Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan, MSD, AstraZeneca KK, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Novartis; consulting fees from AstraZeneca KK, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and MSD KK; honoraria from Johnson & Johnson Japan, AstraZeneca KK, Eli Lilly Japan, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharma, Medtronic Japan, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD KK, BMS KK, Daiichi Sankyo KK, and Teijin Pharma; serving as a data safety monitoring committee member for Chugai Pharmaceutical; and serving as an advisory board member for AstraZeneca KK, MSD, Novartis, and Eli Lilly. KN additionally reports institutional grants or contracts from AstraZeneca KK, MSD KK, Ono Pharmaceutical, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis Pharma KK, Pfizer Japan, BMS, Eli Lilly Japan KK, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Biopharma, Parexel International, PRA Health Sciences, EPS Corporation, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, PPD-SNBL KK, SymBio Pharmaceutical, IQVIA Services Japan KK, Syneos Health Clinical KK, Nippon Kayaku, EP-CRSU, Mebix, Janssen Pharmaceutical KK, AbbVie, Bayer Yakuhin, Eiasi, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Covance Japan, Japan Clinical Research Operations, Takeda Pharmaceutical, GSK KK, Sanofi KK, Sysmex Corporation, Medical Research Support, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, SRL, Pfizer R&D Japan GK, and Amgen; consulting fees from Eli Lilly Japan KK, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Pfizer Japan; honoraria from Ono Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Nippon Kayaku, AstraZeneca KK, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan KK, MSD KK, Pfizer Japan, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bayer Yakuhin, CMIC ShiftZero KK, Life Technologies Japan, Neo Communication, Roche Diagnostics KK, AbbVie, Merck Biopharma, Kyowa Kirin, Takeda Pharmaceutical, 3H Clinical Trial, CareNet, Medical Review, Yodosha, Nikkei Business Publications, Japan Clinical Research Operations, CMIC, Novartis Pharma KK, Taiyo Pharma, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, BMS KK; and patents with Daiichi Sankyo. RS additionally reports institutional grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Celgene, Ipsen, Janssen, Mirati, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, and Roche; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Seagen, and Takeda; honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, MSD, Novartis, and Roche; data safety monitoring or advisory board participation with Roche and Takeda; and a leadership role with the European Thoracic Oncology Platform International Breast Cancer Study Group (ETOP IBCSG) Partners Foundation. BB additionally reports institutional grants or contracts from 4D Pharma, AbbVie, Amgen, Aptitude Health, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cergentis, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Cristal Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Genzyme Corporation, GSK, Inivata, Ipsen, Janssen, Onxeo, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Sanofi, Takeda, Tolero Pharmaceuticals, and Turning Point Therapeutics. SP additionally reports institutional grants or contracts from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, GSK, MSD, and Roche/Genentech; consulting fees paid to their institution from AbbVie, AiCME, Amgen, Arcus, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Biocartis, BioInvent, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, ecancer, Eli Lilly, Elsevier, F-Star, Fishawack, Foundation Medicine, Genzyme, Gilead, GSK, Illumina, Imedex, IQVIA, Incyte, iTeos, Janssen, Medscape, MSD, Merck Serono, Merrimack, Novartis, Novocure, Oncology Education, PharmaMar, PeerView, PER, Phosplatin Therapeutics, Pfizer, Prime, Regeneron, RMEI, Roche/Genentech, RTP, Sanofi, Seagen, Takeda, and Vaccibody; honoraria paid to their institution from AiCME, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, ecancer, Eli Lilly, Foundation Medicine, Illumina, Imedex, Medscape, MSD, Mirati, Novartis, PeerView, PER, Pfizer, Prime, Roche/Genentech, RTP, Sanofi, and Takeda; travel support from AstraZeneca, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, and Takeda; and participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board, with all fees paid to their institution, from AbbVie, Amgen, Arcus, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Biocartis, BioInvent, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eli Lilly, F-Star, Foundation Medicine, Genzyme, Gilead, GSK, Illumina, Incyte, iTeos, Janssen, MSD, Merck Serono, Merrimack, Novartis, Novocure, PharmaMar, Phosplatin Therapeutics, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Seagen, Takeda, and Vaccibody. JY, AS, and SMK report salary for full-time employment from MSD; AS and SMK also own stock in Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Malnutrition is a condition that has a great impact on oncology patients. Poor nutritional status is often associated with increased morbidity and mortality, increased toxicity, and reduced tolerance to chemotherapy, among other complications. The recently developed GLIM criteria for malnutrition aim to homogenize its diagnosis, considering the baseline disease status. We aimed to evaluate the performance of these new criteria for the prediction of complications and mortality in patients with cancer. Methods: This work is a prospective, single-center study. All outpatients under active treatment for head and neck, upper gastrointestinal, and colorectal tumors between February and October 2020 were recruited. These patients were followed up for 6 months, assessing the occurrence of complications and survival based on GLIM diagnoses of malnutrition. Results: We enrolled 165 outpatients, 46.66% of whom were malnourished. During the 6-month follow-ups, patients with malnutrition (46.7%, according to GLIM criteria) had a ~3-fold increased risk of hospital admission (p < 0.001) and occurrence of severe infection (considered as those requiring hospitalization, intravenous antibiotics, and/or drainage by interventional procedures) (p = 0.002). Similarly, malnourished patients had a 3.5-fold increased risk of poor pain control and a 4.4-fold increased need for higher doses of opioids (both p < 0.001). They also had a 2.6-fold increased risk of toxicity (p = 0.044) and a 2.5-fold increased likelihood of needing a dose decrease or discontinuation of cancer treatment (p = 0.011). The 6-month survival of malnourished patients was significantly lower (p = 0.023) than in non-malnourished patients. Conclusions: Diagnoses of malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria in oncology patients undergoing active treatment predict increased complications and worse survival at 6-month follow-ups, making them a useful tool for assessing the nutritional status of oncology patients.

The contribution of the T cell-related inhibitory checkpoint PD-1 to the regulation of NK cell activity is still not clear with contradictory results concerning its expression and role in the modulation of NK cell cytotoxicity. We provide novel key findings on the mechanism involved in the regulation of PD-1 expression on NK cell membrane and its functional consequences for the elimination of cancer cells. In contrast to freshly isolated NK cells from cancer patients, those from healthy donors did not express PD-1 on the cell membrane. However, when healthy NK cells were incubated with tumor target cells, membrane PD-1 expression increased, concurrent with the CD107a surface mobilization. This finding suggested that PD-1 was translocated to the cell membrane during NK cell degranulation after contact with target cells. Indeed, cytosolic PD-1 was expressed in freshly-isolated-NK cells and partly co-localized with CD107a and GzmB, confirming that membrane PD-1 corresponded to a pool of preformed PD-1. Moreover, NK cells that had mobilized PD-1 to the cell membrane presented a significantly reduced anti-tumor activity on PD-L1-expressing-tumor cells in vitro and in vivo , which was partly reversed by using anti-PD-1 blocking antibodies. Our results indicate that NK cells from healthy individuals express cytotoxic granule-associated PD-1, which is rapidly mobilized to the cell membrane after interaction with tumor target cells. This novel finding helps to understand how PD-1 expression is regulated on NK cell membrane and the functional consequences of this expression during the elimination of tumor cells, which will help to design more efficient NK cell-based cancer immunotherapies., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s)., (© 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.)

Introduction: The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to conventional chemotherapy (CT) as first-line treatment improves survival in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the relative efficacy of first-line ICIs compared with CT in patients with ES-SCLC., Methods: Two independent reviewers extracted relevant data according to PRISMA guidelines and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models to calculate an average effect size for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety outcomes in the overall populations and clinically relevant subgroups., Results: A literature search of PubMed and Embase was performed. Six randomized controlled clinical trials (IMpower133, CHECKMATE-451, CASPIAN, KEYNOTE-604, and phase II and III ipilimumab plus CT trials) with a total of 3757 patients were included. Compared with CT alone, ICIs plus CT showed a favourable effect on OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.79-0.96) and PFS (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.72-0.83) but a non-significant increase in the risk of experiencing any adverse event (relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI 0.99-1.11). The estimated HR for OS favoured ICI combinations in all planned subgroups according to age (< 65 years/≥ 65 years), sex (men/women), and ECOG performance status (0/1). Analysis by specific ICI revealed significant improvements in OS only for atezolizumab + CT (HR 1.36; 95% CI 1.09-1.69) and durvalumab + CT (HR 1.35; 95% CI 1.12-1.62) compared with CT alone., Conclusion: Combining anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 antibodies with platinum/etoposide is a superior therapeutic approach compared to CT alone for the first-line treatment of patients with ES-SCLC., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Many studies have assessed different malnutrition screening tools in oncologic patients. However, very few have been carried out using the new GLIM criteria for malnutrition. The objective of our study is to compare the most recommended screening tools with respect to the new GLIM criteria for malnutrition in cancer patients., Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, and single-center study carried out at the Medical Oncology Department at the Lozano Blesa Hospital in Zaragoza. We recruited 165 patients with tumors of the upper-gastrointestinal-tract, colorectal, and head-and-neck region undergoing outpatient treatment. All of them received MST, MUST, Nutriscore, MNA and CONUT screening tools, as well as the GLIM diagnostic criteria, which was used as the gold standard., Results: MNA-SF showed the best sensitivity (0.99) and lowest specificity while CONUT had the best specificity (0.89) and lowest sensitivity to detect cancer-related malnutrition. We observed high variability in the diagnostic capabilities of Nutriscore when tumor location was considered, reducing sensitivity in patients with colorectal cancer compared to those with tumors of the upper-gastrointestinal-tract or head-and-neck location (0.25, 0.83, and 0.91 respectively). The highest index of agreement between the screening tools was found between MST, MUST and Nutriscore tests. Regarding the GLIM criteria, the highest agreement index was presented by MUST tool (0.66), while CONUT presented the lowest (0.12)., Conclusions: Selecting the screening tool according to the type of cancer and its location may allow us to optimize its use and increase its performance, exploiting the advantages of each of them in the different populations., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Introduction: Afatinib and pembrolizumab have separately shown survival benefit in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) of the lung, and there is biological rationale for concurrent inhibition of the programmed death ligand-1 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathways in this patient population., Materials and Methods: This open-label, single-arm study enrolled patients with SqCC of the lung who had progressed during/after first-line chemotherapy and comprised two parts: a safety run-in to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D; afatinib 40 mg or 30 mg once daily with pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks); and the main part assessing efficacy and safety of the RP2D. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included the RP2D, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Twenty-four patients were treated in the safety run-in (afatinib 40 mg/30 mg cohorts: n = 12/12). Median age was 63.5 years; 79.2% of patients were male. All patients discontinued afatinib and pembrolizumab, most commonly due to disease progression (58.3% and 75.0%, respectively) or adverse events (AEs; 37.5% and 25.0%, respectively). The study was discontinued early after completion of the safety run-in, and no patients entered the main part. ORR was 12.5%; median PFS and OS were 13.1 and 29.3 weeks, respectively. All patients had ≥ 1 drug-related AE (grade ≥ 3: 45.8%)., Conclusion: While there were no new or unexpected safety findings, exploratory analysis of antitumor activity indicated limited efficacy with afatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with SqCC of the lung who had progressed during/after first-line chemotherapy., Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT03157089., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The close contact between people and their pets has generated the exchange of skin microbiota, accompanied by bacteria that present resistance to antibiotics. Staphylococcus spp., opportunistic pathogens present in the skin and mucosa of mammals, have had their importance recognized in human and veterinary medicine. The objectives of this study were to identify Staphylococcus spp. present in isolates from the nostrils of healthy humans, dogs and cats as well as to determine their phenotype of resistance to methicillin. Strain identification was performed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using a disk diffusion assay for 12 antibiotics. Sixty humans (veterinary and technicians), sixty dogs and sixty cats were sampled; of them, 61.6%, 56.6% and 46.6%, respectively, carried Staphylococcus spp. in their nostrils, and only two people carried two different species of Staphylococcus in the only anatomical site sampled. A methicillin-resistant phenotype was present in 48.7% of the humans, 26.5% of the dogs and 57.1% of the cats, and sampled. These results demonstrate the presence of Staphylococcus spp. strains resistant to methicillin in personnel who work in contact with animals, as well as in dogs and cats that entered the same hospital or veterinary clinic, which alerts us to the potential transfer of these strains to or between people, dogs and/or cats.

Background: Up to 26% of patients with early-stage cervical cancer experience relapse after primary surgery. However, little is known about which factors influence prognosis following disease recurrence. Therefore, our aims were to determine post-recurrence disease-specific survival (PR-DSS) and to identify respective prognostic factors for PR-DSS., Methods: Data from 528 patients with early-stage cervical cancer who relapsed after primary surgery performed between 2007 and 2016 were obtained from the SCANN study (Surveillance in Cervical CANcer). Factors related to the primary disease and recurrence were combined in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to predict PR-DSS., Results: The 5-year PR-DSS was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.7%-44.5%), median disease-free interval between primary surgery and recurrence (DFI1) was 1.5 years, and median survival after recurrence was 2.5 years. Six significant variables were identified in the multivariable analysis and were used to construct the prognostic model. Two were related to primary treatment (largest tumour size and lymphovascular space invasion) and four to recurrence (DFI1, age at recurrence, presence of symptoms, and recurrence type). The C-statistic after 10-fold cross-validation of prognostic model reached 0.701 (95% CI 0.675-0.727). Three risk-groups with significantly differing prognoses were identified, with 5-year PR-DSS rates of 81.8%, 44.6%, and 12.7%., Conclusions: We developed the robust model of PR-DSS to stratify patients with relapsed cervical cancer according to risk profiles using six routinely recorded prognostic markers. The model can be utilised in clinical practice to aid decision-making on the strategy of recurrence management, and to better inform the patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Outside the submitted work, Dr. Abu-Rustum reports grants from Stryker/Novadaq and GRAIL (paid to the institution). The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Current guidelines for surveillance strategy in cervical cancer are rigid, recommending the same strategy for all survivors. The aim of this study was to develop a robust model allowing for individualised surveillance based on a patient's risk profile., Methods: Data of 4343 early-stage patients with cervical cancer treated between 2007 and 2016 were obtained from the international SCCAN (Surveillance in Cervical Cancer) consortium. The Cox proportional hazards model predicting disease-free survival (DFS) was developed and internally validated. The risk score, derived from regression coefficients of the model, stratified the cohort into significantly distinctive risk groups. On its basis, the annual recurrence risk model (ARRM) was calculated., Results: Five variables were included in the prognostic model: maximal pathologic tumour diameter; tumour histotype; grade; number of positive pelvic lymph nodes; and lymphovascular space invasion. Five risk groups significantly differing in prognosis were identified with a five-year DFS of 97.5%, 94.7%, 85.2% and 63.3% in increasing risk groups, whereas a two-year DFS in the highest risk group equalled 15.4%. Based on the ARRM, the annual recurrence risk in the lowest risk group was below 1% since the beginning of follow-up and declined below 1% at years three, four and >5 in the medium-risk groups. In the whole cohort, 26% of recurrences appeared at the first year of the follow-up, 48% by year two and 78% by year five., Conclusion: The ARRM represents a potent tool for tailoring the surveillance strategy in early-stage patients with cervical cancer based on the patient's risk status and respective annual recurrence risk. It can easily be used in routine clinical settings internationally., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of LungBEAM was to determine the value of a novel epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation test in blood based on BEAMing technology to predict disease progression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with first- or second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Another goal was to monitor the dynamics of EGFR mutations, as well as to track EGFR exon 20 p.T790M (p.T790M) resistance during treatment, as critical indicators of therapeutic efficacy and patient survival., Methods: Stage IV NSCLC patients with locally confirmed EGFR-TKI sensitizing mutations (ex19del and/or L858R) in biopsy tissue who were candidates to receive first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI as first-line therapy were included. Plasma samples were obtained at baseline and every 4 weeks during treatment until a progression-free survival (PFS) event or until study completion (72-week follow-up). The mutant allele fraction (MAF) was determined for each identified mutation using BEAMing., Results: A total of 68 of the 110 (61.8%) patients experienced a PFS event. Twenty-six patients (23.6%) presented with an emergent p.T790M mutation in plasma at some point during follow-up, preceding radiologic progression with a median of 76 (interquartile ratio: 54-111) days. Disease progression correlated with the appearance of p.T790M in plasma with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-2.54; p < 0.001). The HR for progression in patients showing increasing plasma sensitizing mutation levels (positive MAF slope) versus patients showing either decreasing or unchanged plasma mutation levels (negative or null MAF slopes) was 3.85 (95% CI, 2.01-7.36; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Detection and quantification of EGFR mutations in circulating tumor DNA using the highly sensitive BEAMing method should greatly assist in optimizing treatment decisions for advanced NSCLC patients., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Immunotherapy has become a new paradigm in oncology, improving outcomes for several types of cancer. However, there are some aspects about its management that remain uncertain. One of the key points that needs better understanding is the interaction between immunotherapy and gut microbiome and how modulation of the microbiome might modify the efficacy of immunotherapy. Consequently, the negative impact of systemic antibiotics and corticosteroids on the efficacy of immunotherapy needs to be clarified.

Aim: To stablish a consensus on the treatment strategy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm) in Spain., Methods: After a systematic literature review, the scientific committee developed 33 statements in 4 fields: molecular diagnosis (10 items); histologic profile and patient clinical characteristics (7 items); first-line (1L) treatment in EGFRm aNSCLC (8 items); and subsequent-line treatment (8 items). A panel of 31 experts completed 2 Delphi online questionnaires rating their degree of agreement/disagreement for each statement through a 1-9 range scale (1-3 = disagree, 7-9 = agree). Consensus was reached if 2/3 of the participants are in the median range., Results: In the first Delphi round consensus was achieved for 24/33 of the statements. One of the assertions was deleted, proceeding to a second round with the eight remaining questions with no consensus or in the range of indeterminacy. Determination of the EGFR status from tissue and analysis of the different biomarkers are two important variables that influenced treatment decision in patients with aNSCLC. 1L treatment should be the best therapeutic option, independently of the subsequent lines of treatment. For patients with the most common activating mutations osimertinib was considered the most efficient and safe 1L option. In case of disease progression, a new biopsy was needed., Conclusions: A consensus document is proposed to optimize the treatment strategy for untreated patients with a NSCLC with EGFR sensitizing mutations.

Background: LUX-Lung 8 was a randomised, controlled, phase 3 study comparing afatinib and erlotinib as second-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung. We report the final overall survival (OS) and safety analyses of LUX-Lung 8 and investigate the characteristics of patients who achieved long-term benefit (≥12 months' treatment)., Methods: LUX-Lung 8 (NCT01523587) enroled patients between March 2012 and January 2014 in 183 cancer centres located in 23 countries worldwide and this final analysis had a data cut-off of March 2018. Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV lung SCC and had progressed after at least four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive afatinib (40 mg per day) or erlotinib (150 mg per day) until disease progression. Endpoints included OS and safety; a post-hoc analysis of patients with long-term benefit (≥12 months on treatment) was also conducted., Findings: 795 eligible patients were randomly assigned (398 to afatinib, 397 to erlotinib). OS was significantly prolonged with afatinib compared with erlotinib (median 7·8 months vs 6·8 months; hazard ratio 0·84; 95% CI 0·73-0·97; p  = 0·0193). These findings were consistent with those of the primary analysis and were consistent across subgroups. Adverse events (AEs) were manageable with dose interruption and reduction, with similar AEs being experienced between both groups. Twenty-one (5·3%) patients receiving afatinib and 13 (3·3%) patients receiving erlotinib achieved long-term benefit; median OS was 34·6 months and 20·1 months, respectively. Amongst 132 afatinib-treated patients who underwent tumour genetic analysis, ERBB family mutations were more common in patients with long-term benefit than in the overall population (50% vs 21%)., Interpretation: Afatinib is a treatment option for patients with SCC of the lung progressing on chemotherapy who are ineligible for immunotherapy, particularly those with ERBB family genetic aberrations. Afatinib has a predictable and manageable tolerability profile, and long-term treatment may be well tolerated., Competing Interests: GDG received travel expenses from AstraZeneca and advisory board honoraria from Celgene. SL received research support from AstraZeneca, Hutchison MediPharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Heng Rui, Roach, speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, Hansoh, advisor and consultant of AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Hutchison MediPharma, Simcere, ZaiLab, GenomiCare and Roche. KHL received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer for advisory board meetings. AM received honoraria from Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim. AA received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eli Lilly, Roche, AstraZeneca. EF received personal fees for advisory boards from Abbvie, Blue Print Medicines, Guardant Health, Janssen, Medscape, Merck KGaA, Samsung, GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer; advisory board and speakers’ bureau fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda; speakers’ bureau fees from Prime Oncology, Touchime; research funding from Grant For Oncology Innovation (GOI), Fundación Merck Salud; Grífols: independent member of the board. AC and SB are employees of Boehringer Ingelheim. MC, KS, EG, VG, DI, YJM have no conflicts to disclose., (© 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background & Aims: Malnutrition is one of the most prevalent problems among oncological patients. It reduces the response to treatments and negatively impacts survival. In 2019, a consensus criteria for diagnosing malnutrition (GLIM criteria) were proposed by most scientific nutrition societies. The objective of our work is 1) to assess the diagnostic capacity of the GLIM criteria in ambulatory patients with cancer and 2) to compare the GLIM with the ESPEN criteria to evaluate the contributions of these new criteria with respect to the existing ones., Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, and single-center study carried out at the Medical Oncology Department in the Lozano Blesa Clinical Hospital in Zaragoza (Spain). One hundred and sixty-five outpatients with tumors in the upper gastrointestinal tract, head and neck, and colorectal locations were recruited. All of them received the MST, MUST, and Nutriscore screening tools along with the ESPEN and GLIM diagnostic criteria., Results: The prevalence of malnutrition was 46.7% according to the GLIM criteria and 21.2% using the ESPEN tool. Patients diagnosed by GLIM had a higher body mass index (BMI, 24.3 kg/m 2 ) and muscle mass (MM, 16.1 kg/m 2 ) than those diagnosed by ESPEN (21.2 kg/m 2 and 14.3 kg/m 2 respectively, both p = 0.001). The MST, MUST, and Nutriscore tools had a higher degree of concordance with GLIM compared to ESPEN (MST 0.53 vs 0.26; MUST 0.36 vs 0.66; Nutriscore 0.28 vs 0.54)., Conclusions: The found prevalence of malnutrition in cancer patients is higher using the GLIM instead of ESPEN criteria. This disparity can be explained at least in part by the difficulty of the ESPEN criteria for malnutrition to diagnose patients with high baseline BMI or MM. The use of criteria with greater sensitivity, such as the new GLIM criteria, could help early diagnosis and thus early intervention in cancer patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.)