Search

Previous studies used to enumerate circulating tumor cells to predict prognosis and therapeutic effect of colorectal cancer. However, increasing studies have shown that only circulating tumor cells enumeration was not enough to reflect the heterogeneous condition of tumor. In this study, we classified different metastatic-potential circulating tumor cells from colorectal cancer patients and measured FAM172A expression in circulating tumor cells to improve accuracy of clinical diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer. Blood samples were collected from 45 primary colorectal cancer patients. Circulating tumor cells were enriched by blood filtration using isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells, and in situ hybridization with RNA method was used to identify and discriminate subgroups of circulating tumor cells. Afterwards, FAM172A expression in individual circulating tumor cells was measured. Three circulating tumor cell subgroups (epithelial/biophenotypic/mesenchymal circulating tumor cells) were identified using epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers. In our research, mesenchymal circulating tumor cells significantly increased along with tumor progression, development of distant metastasis, and vascular invasion. Furthermore, FAM172A expression rate in mesenchymal circulating tumor cells was significantly higher than that in epithelial circulating tumor cells, which suggested that FAM172A may correlate with malignant degree of tumor. This hypothesis was further verified by FAM172A expression in mesenchymal circulating tumor cells, which was strictly related to tumor aggressiveness factors. Mesenchymal circulating tumor cells and FAM172A detection may predict highrisk stage II colorectal cancer. Our research proved that circulating tumor cells were feasible surrogate samples to detect gene expression and could serve as a predictive biomarker for tumor evaluation.

Purpose: To assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) plus targeted agents versus NCT alone for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients., Methods: Trials published between 1994 and 2015 were identified by an electronic search of public databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library). All clinical studies were independently identified by two authors for inclusion. Demographic data, treatment regimens, objective response rate (ORR), hepatic resection and R0 hepatic resection rate were extracted and analyzed using Comprehensive MetaAnalysis software (Version 2.0)., Results: A total of 40 cohorts with 2099 CRLM patients were included: 962 patients were treated with NCT alone, 602 with NCT plus anti-epidermal growth-factor receptor (EGFR)-monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) and 535 with NCT plus bevacizumab. Pooled ORR was significantly higher for NCT plus bevacizumab or anti-EGFR-MoAbs than NCT alone [relative risk (RR) 1.53, 95% CI 1.30-1.80; p < 0.001; RR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.27-1.83, p < 0.001; respectively]. NCT plus bevacizumab significantly improved R0 hepatic resection rate (RR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.27-2.04, p < 0.001), but not for overall hepatic resection rate (RR 1.26, 95% CI: 0.81-1.94, p = 0.30). While hepatic resection and R0 hepatic resection rate was comparable between NCT plus anti-EGFR-MoAbs and NCT alone (p = 0.42 and p = 0.37, respectively)., Conclusions: In comparison with NCT alone, NCT plus bevacizumab significantly improve ORR and R0 hepatic resection rate but not for hepatic resection rate. Our findings support the need to compare NCT plus bevacizumab with NCT alone in the neoadjuvant setting in large prospective trials due to its higher hepatic resection rate and R0 hepatic resection rate in CRLM patients.