Search

Blocking the mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway with the MEK1/2 inhibitor trametinib has produced promising results in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In the current study, we showed that trametinib treatment leads to overexpression and activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in HNSCC cell lines and patient‐derived xenografts. Knockdown of EGFR improved trametinib treatment efficacy both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that trametinib‐induced EGFR overexpression hyperactivates the phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway. In vitro, blocking the PI3K pathway with GDC‐0941 (pictilisib), or BYL719 (alpelisib), prevented AKT pathway hyperactivation and enhanced the efficacy of trametinib in a synergistic manner. In vivo, a combination of trametinib and BYL719 showed superior antitumor efficacy vs. the single agents, leading to tumor growth arrest. We confirmed our findings in a syngeneic murine head and neck cancer cell line in vitro and in vivo. Taken together, our findings show that trametinib treatment induces hyperactivation of EGFR/PI3K/AKT; thus, blocking of the EGFR/PI3K pathway is required to improve trametinib efficacy in HNSCC.

Growth hormone (GH) has been shown to improve implantation and live birth rates in women of >40 years of age treated by in vitro fertilization (IVF). This effect was initially attributed to a GH effect on oocyte quality, but later studies showed that GH can also improve uterine receptivity for embryo implantation. As to younger women with previous failures of embryo implantation after IVF, data reported in the literature are ambiguous. This retrospective study focused on this latter category of women, comparing the numbers and morphological appearance of oocytes recovered from women with two previous IVF failures, aged between 30 and 39 years and treated with GH, with a comparable group of women without GH treatment. These results were complemented with the analysis of morphological markers of zygote and embryo quality and IVF clinical outcomes in both groups. The oocytes, zygotes and embryos from women treated with GH showed better morphological scores, and their uterine transfer resulted in more implantations, pregnancies and live births, as compared with the untreated group. It is concluded that the improvement of IVF outcomes in women with previous repeated IVF failures by exogenous GH administration is, at least partly, related to an increase in oocyte developmental potential. The statistically evident improvement of oocyte and embryo quality is the main finding of this study. Its weakness is its retrospective nature.

Growth hormone (GH) has been shown to improve implantation and live birth rates in women of >40 years of age treated by in vitro fertilization (IVF). This effect was initially attributed to a GH effect on oocyte quality, but later studies showed that GH can also improve uterine receptivity for embryo implantation. As to younger women with previous failures of embryo implantation after IVF, data reported in the literature are ambiguous. This retrospective study focused on this latter category of women, comparing the numbers and morphological appearance of oocytes recovered from women with two previous IVF failures, aged between 30 and 39 years and treated with GH, with a comparable group of women without GH treatment. These results were complemented with the analysis of morphological markers of zygote and embryo quality and IVF clinical outcomes in both groups. The oocytes, zygotes and embryos from women treated with GH showed better morphological scores, and their uterine transfer resulted in more implantations, pregnancies and live births, as compared with the untreated group. It is concluded that the improvement of IVF outcomes in women with previous repeated IVF failures by exogenous GH administration is, at least partly, related to an increase in oocyte developmental potential. The statistically evident improvement of oocyte and embryo quality is the main finding of this study. Its weakness is its retrospective nature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]