Search

Problem After Italy's first national restriction measures in 2020, a robust approach was needed to monitor the emerging epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at subnational level and provide data to inform the strengthening or easing of epidemic control measures. Approach We adapted the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control rapid risk assessment tool by including quantitative and qualitative indicators from existing national surveillance systems. We defined COVID-19 risk as a combination of the probability of uncontrolled transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and of an unsustainable impact of COVID-19 cases on hospital services, adjusted in relation to the health system's resilience. The monitoring system was implemented with no additional cost in May 2020. Local setting The infectious diseases surveillance system in Italy uses consistent data collection methods across the country's decentralized regions and autonomous provinces. Relevant changes Weekly risk assessments using this approach were sustainable in monitoring the epidemic at regional level from 4 May 2020 to 24 September 2021. The tool provided reliable assessments of when and where a rapid increase in demand for health-care services would occur if control or mitigation measures were not increased in the following 3 weeks. Lessons learnt Although the system worked well, framing the risk assessment tool in a legal decree hampered its flexibility, as indicators could not be changed without changing the law. The relative complexity of the tool, the impossibility of real-time validation and its use for the definition of restrictions posed communication challenges. Probleme Apres avoir pris ses premieres mesures de restriction nationales en 2020, l'Italie avait besoin d'une approche solide pour surveiller l'epidemie naissante de maladie a coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) au niveau regional, et fournir les donnees permettant de renforcer ou d'alleger les mesures destinees a l'endiguer. Approche Nous avons adapte l'outil d'evaluation rapide des risques du Centre europeen de prevention et de controle des maladies en y integrant des indicateurs quantitatifs et qualitatifs issus des systemes de surveillance nationaux existants. Pour definir le risque lie a la COVID-19, nous avons associe la probabilite d'une transmission incontrolee du coronavirus 2 du syndrome respiratoire aigu severe, a l'impact immediat des cas de COVID-19 sur les services hospitaliers, en procedant a des ajustements selon la resilience du systeme de soins de sante. Le dispositif de surveillance a ete mis en reuvre en mai 2020 sans entrainer de couts supplementaires. Environnement local En Italie, le systeme de surveillance des maladies infectieuses repose sur des methodes uniformes de collecte de donnees dans les provinces autonomes et regions decentralisees a travers le pays. Changements significatifs Les evaluations des risques realisees toutes les semaines avec cette approche ont permis de surveiller l'epidemie a l'echelle regionale du 4 mai 2020 au 24 septembre 2021. L'outil a identifie les dates et lieux susceptibles de connaitre une augmentation rapide de la demande en services de soins de sante si aucune mesure supplementaire de controle et de lutte n'etait prise dans les trois semaines. Lecons tirees Bien que le systeme ait fonctionne, inscrire l'outil d'evaluation des risques dans un decret legislatif a reduit sa flexibilite, car les indicateurs ne pouvaient etre modifies sans reformer la loi. La relative complexite de l'outil, l'impossibilite de proceder a une validation en temps reel et son usage pour imposer des restrictions ont pose des problemes de communication. Situacion Tras las primeras medidas nacionales de restriccion en Italia en 2020, se necesitaba un enfoque solido para supervisar la epidemia emergente de la coronavirosis de 2019 (COVID-19) a nivel subnacional y proporcionar datos que informaran sobre el refuerzo o la flexibilizacion de las medidas de contencion de la epidemia. Enfoque Se adapto la herramienta de valoracion rapida de riesgos del Centro Europeo para la Prevencion y el Control de las Enfermedades, al incluir indicadores cuantitativos y cualitativos de los sistemas nacionales de vigilancia existentes. Se definio el riesgo de la COVID-19 como una combinacion de la probabilidad de transmision descontrolada del coronavirus del sindrome respiratorio agudo grave de tipo 2 y de un efecto no sostenible de los casos de la COVID-19 en los servicios hospitalarios, y se ajusto en relacion con la capacidad de recuperacion del sistema sanitario. El sistema de supervision se aplico sin costes adicionales en mayo de 2020. Marco regional El sistema de vigilancia de las enfermedades infecciosas en Italia aplica metodos de recopilacion de datos coherentes en todas las regiones y provincias autonomas descentralizadas del pais. Cambios importantes Las valoraciones semanales de los riesgos mediante este enfoque fueron sostenibles en la supervision de la epidemia a nivel regional entre el 4 de mayo de 2020 y el 24 de septiembre de 2021. La herramienta proporciono valoraciones fiables de cuando y donde se produciria un rapido aumento de la demanda de servicios sanitarios si no se incrementaban las medidas de contencion o mitigacion en las tres semanas siguientes. Lecciones aprendidas Aunque el sistema funciono bien, el hecho de enmarcar la herramienta de valoracion de los riesgos en un decreto legal dificulto su flexibilidad, ya que los indicadores no se podian modificar sin cambiar la ley. La relativa complejidad de la herramienta, la imposibilidad de validacion en tiempo real y su uso para la definicion de las restricciones plantearon problemas de comunicacion., Introduction In its first response to the emerging epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the Italian government implemented national restriction measures with strict physical distancing and restrictions on public movements [...]

The document titled "Recent Advances across the Spectrum of Heart Failure and Heart Transplant" provides an overview of the progress made in the field of heart failure and heart transplantation. It discusses the development of new drugs and devices for heart failure treatment, as well as the challenges in tailoring therapy for individual patients. The document also explores the use of device therapy in improving outcomes for heart failure patients. It addresses the management of acute heart failure and the complexities of long-term management for heart transplant recipients. The document discusses various aspects of heart transplantation, including the use of anticoagulants and antimicrobial prophylaxis, the importance of ABO compatibility, and the potential for using non-A1 donors. These findings contribute to the understanding of heart transplant management and suggest areas for further research. [Extracted from the article]

Medication adherence in chronic conditions is a long-term process. Modeling longitudinal trajectories using routinely collected prescription data is a promising method for describing adherence patterns and identifying at-risk groups. The study aimed to characterize distinct long-term sacubitril/valsartan adherence trajectories and factors associated with them in patients with heart failure (HF). Subjects with incident HF starting sac/val in 2017–2018 were identified from the Campania Regional Database for Medication Consumption. We estimated patients' continuous medication availability (CMA9; R package AdhereR) during a 12-month period. We selected groups with similar CMA9 trajectories (Calinski-Harabasz criterion; R package kml). We performed multinomial regression analysis, assessing the relationship between demographic and clinical factors and adherence trajectory groups. The cohort included 4455 subjects, 70% male. Group-based trajectory modeling identified four distinct adherence trajectories: high adherence (42.6% of subjects; CMA mean 0.91 ± 0.08), partial drop-off (19.6%; CMA 0.63 ± 0.13), moderate adherence (19.3%; CMA 0.54 ± 0.11), and low adherence (18.4%; CMA 0.17 ± 0.12). Polypharmacy was associated with partial drop-off adherence (OR 1.194, 95%CI 1.175–1.214), while the occurrence of ≥1 HF hospitalization (OR 1.165, 95%CI 1.151–1.179) or other hospitalizations (OR 1.481, 95%CI 1.459–1.503) were associated with low adherence. This study found that tailoring patient education, providing support, and ongoing monitoring can boost adherence within different groups, potentially improving health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Real-world safety studies can provide important evidence on the thromboembolic risk associated with COVID-19 vaccines, considering that millions of people have been already vaccinated against COVID-19. In this study, we aimed to estimate the incidence of thromboembolic events after COVID-19 vaccination and to compare the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine with other COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: We conducted a retrospective real-world safety study using data from two different data sources: the Italian Pharmacovigilance database (Rete Nazionale di Farmacovigilanza, RNF) and the Campania Region Health system (Sistema INFOrmativo saNità CampanIA, SINFONIA). From the start date of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign (27 December 2021) to 27 September 2022, information on COVID-19 vaccinations and thromboembolic events were extracted from the two databases. The reporting rate (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of thromboembolic events for 10,000 doses was calculated for each COVID-19 vaccine. Moreover, the odds of being vaccinated with the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine vs. the other COVID-19 vaccines in cases with thromboembolic events vs. controls without thromboembolic events were computed. Results: A total of 12,692,852 vaccine doses were administered in the Campania Region, of which 6,509,475 (51.28%) were in females and mostly related to the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine (65.05%), followed by Moderna (24.31%), Oxford–AstraZeneca (9.71%), Janssen (0.91%), and Novavax (0.02%) vaccines. A total of 641 ICSRs with COVID-19 vaccines and vascular events were retrieved from the RNF for the Campania Region, of which 453 (70.67%) were in females. Most ICSRs reported the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine (65.05%), followed by Oxford–AstraZeneca (9.71%), Moderna (24.31%), and Janssen (0.91%). A total of 2451 events were reported in the ICSRs (3.8 events for ICSRs), of which 292 were thromboembolic events. The higher RRs of thromboembolic events were found with the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine (RR: 4.62, 95%CI: 3.50–5.99) and Janssen vaccine (RR: 3.45, 95%CI: 0.94–8.82). Thromboembolic events were associated with a higher likelihood of exposure to the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine compared to Pfizer-BioNtech (OR: 6.06; 95%CI: 4.22–8.68) and Moderna vaccines (OR: 6.46; 95%CI: 4.00–10.80). Conclusion: We observed a higher reporting of thromboembolic events with viral-vector-based vaccines (Oxford–AstraZeneca and Janssen) and an increased likelihood of being exposed to the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine compared to the mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNtech and Moderna) among thromboembolic cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and disease are increasingly reported among survivors of anticancer treatments as those treatments are effective in improving prognosis in patients affected by malignancy. It is unclear the extent to which drugs used in general population to prevent ischemic heart disease, valvular heart disease and heart failure, and aortic syndromes, which are related to CV risk factors and preclinical CV disease, are effective in survivors of anticancer treatments. Among those who survived to anticancer treatments, prognosis after cardiac surgery treatments may differ from that in the general population, and may require specific pre-surgery risk assessment. Background: Anticancer treatments are improving the prognosis of patients fighting cancer. However, anticancer treatments may also increase the cardiovascular (CV) risk by increasing metabolic disorders. Atherosclerosis and atherothrombosis related to anticancer treatments may lead to ischemic heart disease (IHD), while direct cardiac toxicity may induce non-ischemic heart disease. Moreover, valvular heart disease (VHD), aortic syndromes (AoS), and advanced heart failure (HF) associated with CV risk factors and preclinical CV disease as well as with chronic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction may also occur in survivors of anti-carcer treatments. Methods: Public electronic libraries have been searched systematically looking at cardiotoxicity, cardioprotection, CV risk and disease, and prognosis after cardiac surgery in survivors of anticancer treatments. Results: CV risk factors and disease may not be infrequent among survivors of anticancer treatments. As cardiotoxicity of established anticancer treatments has been investigated and is frequently irreversible, cardiotoxicity associated with novel treatments appears to be more frequently reversible, but also potentially synergic. Small reports suggest that drugs preventing HF in the general population may be effective also among survivors of anticancer treatments, so that CV risk factors and disease, and chronic inflammation, may lead to indication to cardiac surgery in survivors of anticancer treatments. There is a lack of substantial data on whether current risk scores are efficient to predict prognosis after cardiac surgery in survivors of anticancer treatments, and to guide tailored decision-making. IHD is the most common condition requiring cardiac surgery among survivors of anticancer treatments. Primary VHD is mostly related to a history of radiation therapy. No specific reports exist on AoS in survivors of anticancer treatments. Conclusions: It is unclear whether interventions to dominate cancer- and anticancer treatment-related metabolic syndromes, chronic inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction, leading to IHD, nonIHD, VHD, HF, and AoS, are as effective in survivors of anticancer treatments as in the general population. When CV diseases require cardiac surgery, survivors of anticancer treatments may be a population at specifically elevated risk, rather than affected by a specific risk factor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination can occur because COVID-19 vaccines do not offer 100% protection. The study aim was to assess duration of vaccination coverage, disease symptoms and type of hospitalization among non-vaccinated and vaccinated subjects to evaluate the vaccination trend over time. A retrospective cohort study was carried out among people testing COVID-19 positive in Campania Region using information from the Health Information System of Campania Region (Sinfonia). Vaccination status was assessed considering: no vaccination, partial vaccination and effective vaccination. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the association between ICU admissions caused by COVID-19 and gender, age groups and vaccine type. Vaccine coverage duration trends were investigated using segmented linear regression and breakpoint estimations. Vaccination coverage was assessed by analyzing COVID-19 positive subjects in the 9 months after an effective dose vaccination. A significant risk of hospitalization in the ICU was caused by vaccination status: subjects non-vaccinated (OR: 7.14) and partially vaccinated (OR: 3.68) were 3 and 7 times more at risk of hospitalization, respectively, than subjects effectively vaccinated. Regarding subjects with an effective vaccination, the vaccine's ability to protect against infection in the months following vaccination decreased. The risk of contracting COVID-19 after vaccination was higher 5 months (β = 1441, p < 0.001) and 7 months (β = 3110, p < 0.001) after administration of an effective dose. COVID-19 vaccines were demonstrated to protect from symptomatic infection by significantly reducing hospitalization risk, and their full protection against SARS-CoV-2 was demonstrated to decrease after 5 months regardless of age, gender or vaccine type. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

COVID‐19 is a complex disease, and many difficulties are faced today especially in the proper choice of pharmacological treatments. The role of antiviral agents for COVID‐19 is still being investigated and evidence for immunomodulatory and anti‐inflammatory drugs is quite conflicting, whereas the use of corticosteroids is supported by robust evidence. The use of heparins in hospitalized critically ill patients is preferred over other anticoagulants. There are conflicting data on the use of convalescent plasma and vitamin D. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), many vaccines are in Phase III clinical trials, and some of them have already received marketing approval in European countries and in the United States. In conclusion, drug repurposing has represented the main approach recently used in the treatment of patients with COVID‐19. At this moment, analysis of efficacy and safety data of drugs and vaccines used in real‐life context is strongly needed. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue on The second wave: are we any closer to efficacious pharmacotherapy for COVID 19? (BJP 75th Anniversary). To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v179.10/issuetoc [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all countries with a global mobilization started to produce and authorize vaccines, prioritizing healthcare professionals (HCPs) to reduce transmission. The aim of this study was to assess post-vaccination infections' occurrence among HCPs and their correlation with symptom onset. A retrospective cohort study was carried out in the Campania Region from December 2020 to April 2021. Data were retrieved from the Regional Health Information System of the Campania Region (Sinfonia). The study cohort included subjects that had all received at least one vaccine dose. Risk ratios (RRs) adjusted for age and sex (95% confidence intervals) were performed to assess differences in the prevalence between HCPs who tested positive or negative for COVID-19. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between symptoms and vaccination status. Findings revealed that HCPs had a lower risk of contracting COVID-19 after receiving at least one vaccine dose, and this risk decreased with age. Furthermore, not having full vaccination coverage may predict a severe/critical evolution of the disease. This study provides a snapshot of the initial state of the Italian vaccination campaign on HCPs. A surveillance approach using Big Data matched to clinical conditions could offer a real analysis in the categorization of subjects most at risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heart transplantation from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors has become a potential solution to the limited number of suitable donor allografts. However, predicting the outcome of heart transplantation from DCD donors remains a challenge. Epigenetic mechanisms are being investigated as potential diagnostic and predictive biomarkers for heart transplantation. The authors propose a research approach that integrates cardiac and liquid biopsy to identify epigenetic changes that can predict outcome. This approach could help address the current gaps in predicting outcome in heart transplantation from DCD donors. [Extracted from the article]

Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are promising therapeutic tools in regenerative medicine because they possess self-renewal, differentiation and immunomodulatory capacities. After isolation, ASCs are passaged multiple times in vitro passages to obtain a sufficient amount of cells for clinical applications. During this time-consuming procedure, ASCs become senescent and less proliferative, compromising their clinical efficacy. Here, we sought to investigate how in vitro passages impact ASC proliferation/senescence and expression of immune regulatory proteins. MicroRNAs are pivotal regulators of ASC physiology. Particularly, miR-200c is known to maintain pluripotency and targets the immune checkpoint Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). We therefore investigated its involvement in these critical characteristics of ASCs during in vitro passages. We found that when transiently expressed, miR-200c-3p promotes proliferation, maintains stemness, and contrasts senescence in late passaged ASCs. Additionally, this miRNA modulates PD-L1 and Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase (IDO1) expression, thus most likely interfering with the immunoregulatory capacity of ASCs. Based on our results, we suggest that expression of miR-200c-3p may prime ASC towards a self-renewing phenotype by improving their in vitro expansion. Contrarily, its inhibition is associated with senescence, reduced proliferation and induction of immune regulators. Our data underline the potential use of miR-200c-3p as a switch for ASCs reprogramming and their clinical application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report an unusual case of black discoloration of an aortic root aneurysm and aortic valve cusps due to homogentisic acid deposition in a patient suffering from alkaptonuria. The patient underwent a valve‐sparing aortic root replacement after careful and objective evaluation of the valve cusps. Despite alkaptonuria is classically associated with aortic valve stenosis and replacement, in the present case, the affected valve cusps were suitable for repair. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of aortic valve‐sparing procedure performed in a patient with alkaptonuria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic spread rapidly worldwide increasing exponentially in Italy. To date, there is lack of studies describing clinical characteristics of the people at high risk of infection. Hence, we aimed (i) to identify clinical predictors of SARS-CoV-2 infection risk, (ii) to develop and validate a score predicting SARS-CoV-2 infection risk, and (iii) to compare it with unspecific scores. Methods: Retrospective case-control study using administrative health-related database was carried out in Southern Italy (Campania region) among beneficiaries of Regional Health Service aged over than 30 years. For each person with SARS-CoV-2 confirmed infection (case), up to five controls were randomly matched for gender, age and municipality of residence. Odds ratios and 90% confidence intervals for associations between candidate predictors and risk of infection were estimated by means of conditional logistic regression. SARS-CoV-2 Infection Score (SIS) was developed by generating a total aggregate score obtained from assignment of a weight at each selected covariate using coefficients estimated from the model. Finally, the score was categorized by assigning increasing values from 1 to 4. Discriminant power was used to compare SIS performance with that of other comorbidity scores. Results: Subjects suffering from diabetes, anaemias, Parkinson's disease, mental disorders, cardiovascular and inflammatory bowel and kidney diseases showed increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Similar estimates were recorded for men and women and younger and older than 65 years. Fifteen conditions significantly contributed to the SIS. As SIS value increases, risk progressively increases, being odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection among people with the highest SIS value (SIS = 4) 1.74 times higher than those unaffected by any SIS contributing conditions (SIS = 1). Conclusion: Conditions and diseases making people more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified by the current study. Our results support decision-makers in identifying high-risk people and adopting of preventive measures to minimize the spread of further epidemic waves. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Although preliminary studies have demonstrated safety and effectiveness of single replacement therapy for growth hormone deficiency or testosterone deficiency in heart failure (HF), no data are available regarding the combined treatment with both GH and T in this setting. Thus, the aim of the present hypothesis generating pilot study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of multiple hormonal replacement therapies in chronic HF. Methods and results: Five stable HF with reduced ejection fraction patients, with a concomitant diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency and testosterone deficiency, on top of guideline‐based HF treatment underwent 1 year of GH replacement therapy by subcutaneous injections of somatotropin at a dose of 0.012 mg/kg every second day. After 12 months, a T replacement treatment was added at a dosage of 1000 mg every 3 months. Each patient underwent a complete M‐mode, two‐dimensional, and Doppler echocardiographic examination, and an incremental symptom‐limited cardiopulmonary exercise test on a bicycle ergometer at baseline (BL), after 1 year of GH treatment (V1), and after 1 year of combined GH + T treatments (V2). One‐year of GH treatment resulted in a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (+5.4%, P < 0.01), New York Heart Association functional class (P < 0.05), and peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak) (+19.3%, P < 0.01), and in a significant reduction in NT‐proBNP levels (−35.1%, P < 0.01). Notably, one additional year of combined GH and T replacement therapy induced a further increase in VO2 peak (+27.7%, final delta change + 52.44%, P < 0.01), as well as a significant improvement in muscular strength, as assessed by handgrip dynamometry (+17.5%, final delta change + 25.8%, P < 0.01). These beneficial effects were paralleled with an improvement of the overall clinical status (as assessed by New York Heart Association class). Of note, neither adverse effects nor cardiovascular events were reported during the follow‐up period. Conclusions: Our preliminary data suggest for the first time that combined replacement therapy with GH and T could be considered safe and therapeutic in HF patients with multiple hormone deficiencies, supporting the hypothesis that multiple hormone deficiencies syndrome can be considered as a novel and promising therapeutic target in HF. Further studies with a more robust design and larger population are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] One of the major challenges of cardiovascular primary prevention approach is the absence of early biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction which may be useful for identifying at-risk subjects. Endothelial dysfunction is a systemic disorder in which traditional cardiovascular risk factors, such as aging, gender, hypertension, smoking, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia, as well as emerging risk determinants, such as fetal factors, gut microbiome alteration, clonal hematopoiesis, air pollution, and sleep disorders act synergistically to tip the endothelial balance in favor of vasoconstrictive, pro-inflammatory, and pro-thrombotic phenotypes. Endothelial dysfunction can start already in fetal life and may be regained once detrimental stimuli are removed. The hallmark of endothelial dysfunction is a marked reduction of nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability owing to epigenetic-sensitive dysregulation of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene and upregulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in endothelial cells (ECs). Advance in liquid-based assays and molecular biology tools are providing novel potential EC-specific biomarkers for prediction and diagnosis of endothelial dysfunction. Significant associations between clinically useful indexes of endothelial dysfunction, mainly brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and increased number of endothelial microparticles (EMPs), increased levels of endoglin and endocan, as well as reduced levels of irisin were observed in subjects with one or more traditional risk factors. However, none entered in clinical practice yet. Smoking cessation, weight loss, physical exercise, and diet control are the milestones of cardiovascular primary prevention, and they may restore endothelial function via epigenetic-sensitive pathways able to reduce inflammation and oxidative stress and increase NO production. We briefly summarize well-known and novel molecular routes driving early endothelial dysfunction mainly in human ECs and related potential biomarkers which may add predictive or diagnostic value to the traditional non-invasive techniques. Also, we focus on clinical trials investigating lifestyle modifications and their impact on molecular routes involved in restoring endothelial function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the use of cilostazol as medication for patients undergoing carotid stenting procedure and pose a low risk of bleeding with high risk of restenosis.

Objectives: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterized by a specific transcriptome. Since the DCM molecular network is largely unknown, the aim was to identify specific disease-related molecular targets combining an original machine learning (ML) approach with protein-protein interaction network. Methods: The transcriptomic profiles of human myocardial tissues were investigated integrating an original computational approach, based on the Custom Decision Tree algorithm, in a differential expression bioinformatic framework. Validation was performed by quantitative real-time PCR. Results: Our preliminary study, using samples from transplanted tissues, allowed the discovery of specific DCM-related genes, including MYH6, NPPA, MT-RNR1 and NEAT1, already known to be involved in cardiomyopathies Interestingly, a combination of these expression profiles with clinical characteristics showed a significant association between NEAT1 and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (Rho = 0.73, p = 0.05), according to severity classification (NYHA-class III). Conclusions: The use of the ML approach was useful to discover preliminary specific genes that could lead to a rapid selection of molecular targets correlated with DCM clinical parameters. For the first time, NEAT1 under-expression was significantly associated with LVEDD in the human heart. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: the theoretical advantages of mini-invasive cardiac surgery are shorter hospitalisation, better surgical results and costs reduction. In November 1997 we started a non-coronary mini-invasive surgery program using a partial upper median sternotomy. This study has been conceived to retrospectively compare two groups of patients who underwent isolate aortic valve replacement using the conventional and the mini-invasive technique.Material and methods: in Group A 100 patients (mean age 62±12 years; 58 male) underwent isolated aortic valve replacement through a partial upper median sternotomy. Group B was composed by the last 100 patients (mean age 63±8 years; 56 male) who underwent the same operation through a conventional median sternotomy. For both groups we recorded the ECC and ischaemic times, postoperative intubation time, total postoperative bleeding, intensive care unit length of stay and total hospitalisation time. Major and minor complications were reported.Results: operating times, were significantly longer in Group A (p<0.001). Mechanical ventilation time, ICU and total hospital stay, and total postoperative bleeding showed no significant difference. Adjunctive statistical evidenced the absence of learning curve. Mortality and other complications failed to reveal any significant difference between the two groups.Conclusions: in our experience, partial upper median sternotomy does not increase surgical risks but failed to demonstrate clear advantages. Apart for an increase in operating times, the surgical results are similar to those of a conventional median sternotomy with only improvement in the aesthetical aspect. In our opinion, this supports the conviction that this approach can be proposed to selected patients, to obtain a better cosmethical result for the same given risk. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]