Search

On November 7, 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved cetuximab in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil for the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent locoregional or metastatic squamous cell head and neck cancer. Approval was based on a randomized study of 442 patients conducted outside the U.S. Cisplatin (100 mg/m2 intravenously) or carboplatin (area under the curve 5 intravenously) on day 1 with 5-fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m2/day continuous intravenous infusion days 1-4) were administered every 3 weeks. Cetuximab, 400 mg/m2 intravenously, was administered initially followed by cetuximab, 250 mg/m2 intravenously weekly. After completion of six planned treatment courses, cetuximab patients without progression continued cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly. The study used European Union (EU)-approved cetuximab rather than U.S.-approved cetuximab. U.S.-approved cetuximab provides approximately 28% higher exposure relative to EU-approved cetuximab in a pharmacokinetic comparability study in monkeys. Overall survival, the primary efficacy endpoint, was significantly improved in cetuximab-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.98; p = .034, stratified log-rank test). Median survival times were 10.1 and 7.4 months, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) was also significantly improved in patients receiving cetuximab (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.46-0.72; p.0001). Median PFS times were 5.5 and 3.3 months, respectively. Response rates were 35.6% and 19.5% (odds ratio: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.50-3.60; p.0001). Adverse reactions (≥25%) from cetuximab plus chemotherapy treatment included nausea, anemia, vomiting, neutropenia, rash, asthenia, diarrhea, and anorexia. Conjunctivitis occurred in 10% of cetuximab patients. Other adverse reactions, sometimes severe, included infusion reactions, hypomagnesemia, hypocalcemia, and hypokalemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On March 29, 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administrationapproved peginterferon alfa-2b (PEG-IFN) (Sylatron™;Schering Corporation, Kenilworth, NJ) for the adjuvant treatment of melanoma patients with microscopic or gross nodal involvement following definitive surgical resection including complete lymphadenectomy.The approval was based on a single, open-label, multi-center trial enrolling 1,256 patients. After surgical resection,patients were randomized (1:1) to either PEG-IFN or observation for 5 years. PEG-IFN, 6 g/kg per week, was administered s.c. for eight doses, followed by 3 g/kg per week for up to 252 weeks.Stratification factors included microscopic or gross nodal involvement, number of positive nodes, Breslow thickness, ulceration, sex, and study center. Patients were assessed for recurrence by the investigators based on physical examination every 3 months for 2 years and every 6months thereafter.The relapse-free survival (RFS) interval, the primary efficacy endpoint, was significantly longer in PEG-IFN–treated patients. The median RFS times were 34.8months and 25.5 months, respectively. There was no statisticallysignificant difference in the overall survival time.The most common (>60%) grade 1– 4 adverse reactions were fatigue, increased alanine aminotransferase(ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), pyrexia,headache, anorexia, myalgia, nausea, chills, and injection site reactions. The most common serious adverse reactions were fatigue, increased ALT and AST, and pyrexia. Thirty-three percent of patients receiving PEGIFN discontinued treatment as a result of adverse reactions.Five deaths were reported within 30 days of the last treatment dose, two resulting from cardiovasculardisease considered as possibly related to treatment. The Oncologist 2012;17:1323–1328 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On January 31, 2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted regular approval of imatinib mesylate tablets (Gleevec®; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ) for the adjuvant treatment of adult patients following complete gross resection of Kit+ (CD117+) gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The recommended dose of imatinib is 400 mg/day administered daily for 3 years. Three hundred ninety-seven patients were enrolled in a randomized adjuvant, multicenter, open label, phase III trial comparing 12 months with 36 months of imatinib treatment. Eligible patients had one of the following: tumor diameter >5 cm and mitotic count >5 per 50 high power fields (HPFs); tumor diameter >10 cm and any mitotic count; tumor of any size with mitotic count >10/50 HPFs; or tumor ruptured into the peritoneal cavity. The primary endpoint was the recurrence-free survival (RFS) interval. The median follow-up for patients without an RFS event was 42 months. There were 84 (42%) RFS events in the 12- month treatment arm and 50 (25%) RFS events in the 36- month treatment arm. Thirty-six months of imatinib treatment led to a significantly longer RFS interval than with 12 months of treatment. The median follow-up for overall survival (OS) evaluation in patients still living was 48 months. Thirty-six months of imatinib treatment led to a significantly longer OS time than with 12 months of imatinib treatment. The most common adverse reactions, as noted in previous imatinib studies, were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, edema, decreased hemoglobin, rash, vomiting, and abdominal pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On April 30, 2010, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration converted letrozole (Femara®; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ) from accelerated to full approval for adjuvant and extended adjuvant (following 5 years of tamoxifen) treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. The initial accelerated approvals of letrozole for adjuvant and extended adjuvant treatment on December 28, 2005 and October 29, 2004, respectively, were based on an analysis of the disease-free survival (DFS) outcome of patients followed for medians of 26 months and 28 months, respectively. Both trials were double-blind, multicenter studies. Both trials were unblinded early when an interim analysis showed a favorable letrozole effect on DFS. In updated intention-to-treat analyses of both trials, the risk for a DFS event was lower with letrozole than with tamoxifen (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77- 0.99; p = .03) in the adjuvant trial and was lower than with placebo (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76 -1.03; p = .12) in the extended adjuvant trial. The latter analysis ignores the interim switch of 60% placebo-treated patients to letrozole. Bone fractures and osteoporosis were reported more frequently following treatment with letrozole whereas tamoxifen was associated with a higher risk for endometrial proliferation and endometrial cancer. Myocardial infarction was more frequently reported with letrozole than with tamoxifen, but the incidence of thromboembolic events was higher with tamoxifen than with letrozole. Lipid-lowering medications were required for 25% of patients on letrozole and 16% of patients on tamoxifen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On July 2, 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved pemetrexed injection (Alimta® Injection; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) for maintenance treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer whose disease has not progressed after four cycles of platinum-based doublet induction chemotherapy. A double-blind study of pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care was conducted. Pemetrexed, 500 mg/m2 i.v., was administered every 21 days until disease progression. Folic acid, vitamin B12, and a corticosteroid were given to all study patients. There were 663 randomized patients (pemetrexed, 441; placebo, 222). Treatments were well balanced with respect to baseline disease characteristics and stratification factors. The median overall survival (OS) time for intent-to-treat (ITT) patients was 13.4 months for patients receiving pemetrexed and 10.6 months for those receiving placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.95; p = .012). Median OS times were 15.5 months versus 10.3 months for patients with nonsquamous histologies receiving pemetrexed and placebo, respectively (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.88). The median OS time in patients with squamous histology receiving pemetrexed was 9.9 months, versus 10.8 months for those receiving placebo (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.77-1.50). A significantly longer progression-free survival interval for both the ITT and nonsquamous patient populations receiving pemetrexed maintenance therapy was also observed. The most common (>5%) adverse reactions in patients receiving pemetrexed were hematologic toxicity, an increase in hepatic enzymes, fatigue, gastrointestinal toxicity, sensory neuropathy, and skin rash. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On April 16, 2010, the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved erlotinib tablets (Tarceva; OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Melville, NY) for maintenance treatment of patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease had not progressed after four cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. In total, 889 patients received either erlotinib (150 mg) or placebo once daily. Progression-free survival (PFS), in all patients and in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)+ tumors by immunohistochemistry (IHC), was the primary efficacy endpoint. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary sponsor endpoint but was the primary regulatory endpoint. Median PFS times were 2.8 months and 2.6 months in the erlotinib and placebo arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62- 0.82; p < .001). Median OS times were 12.0 months and 11.0 months, favoring erlotinib (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70 - 0.95). The PFS and OS HRs in patients with EGFR+ tumors by IHC were 0.69 (95% CI, 0.58-0.82) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.64 - 0.93), respectively. The PFS and OS HRs in patients with EGFR− tumors by IHC were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.51-1.14) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.59 -1.38), respectively. Following disease progression, 57% of placebo-treated patients received additional chemotherapy, compared with 47% of erlotinib-treated patients. Fourteen percent of placebo-treated patients received erlotinib or gefitinib, 31% received docetaxel, and 14% received pemetrexed. In total, 59% of placebo-treated patients who received treatment received FDA approved second-line NSCLC drugs. The most common adverse reactions in patients receiving erlotinib were rash and diarrhea. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On December 19, 2008, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved imatinib mesylate tablets for oral use (Gleevec®; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ) for the adjuvant treatment of adult patients following complete gross resection of Kit+ (CD117+) gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolling 713 patients was submitted. The primary objective of the clinical trial was to compare the recurrence-free survival (RFS) intervals of the two groups. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Eligible patients were≥18 years of age with a histological diagnosis of GIST (Kit+), resected tumor size ≥3 cm, and a complete gross resection within 14 -70 days prior to registration. Imatinib, 400 mg orally, was administered once daily for 1 year. The study was terminated after completion of the third protocol-specified interim analysis. At that time, 100 RFS events were confirmed by a blinded central independent review. With a median follow-up of 14 months, 30 RFS events were observed in the imatinib group and 70 were observed in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.398; 95% confidence interval, 0.259-0.610; two-sided p-value < .0001). OS results are immature. Most patients in both groups experienced at least one adverse reaction, and 31% of the imatinib group and 18% of the placebo group experienced grade ≥3 adverse reactions. The most frequently reported adverse reactions (≥20%) were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, edema, decreased hemoglobin, rash, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Drug was discontinued for adverse reactions in 17% and 3% of the imatinib and placebotreated patients, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On July 31, 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted approval for the use of bevacizumab (Avastin®; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) in combination with interferon (IFN)-α2a for the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The approval was primarily based on results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The primary efficacy endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), was assessed by investigators and by an independent review committee (IRC) blinded to treatment assignment. In total, 649 patients (bevacizumab plus IFN, 327; placebo plus IFN, 322) were enrolled. The median PFS times, by investigator determination, were 10.2 months for the bevacizumab plus IFN arm and 5.4 months for the placebo plus IFN arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 -0.72; p < .0001). The IRC analysis of 569 patients with available radiographs yielded similar results (median PFS time, 10.4 months versus 5.5 months; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45-0.72; p < .0001). There was no survival advantage (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.04; p = .13). Support for the above results was provided by summarized results of a North American cooperative group study of bevacizumab plus IFN-α2b versus IFN-α2b alone. The median PFS times were 8.4 months versus 4.9 months in favor of the bevacizumab combination. There was no survival advantage. In the reviewed trial, serious adverse events and National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ⁥3 adverse events were reported more frequently in bevacizumab-treated patients (31% versus 19% and 63% versus 47%, respectively). The most common bevacizumab-related toxicities were bleeding/hemorrhage, hypertension, proteinuria, and venous or arterial thromboembolic events. The Oncologist 2010;15:104-111 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On May 5, 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted accelerated approval to bevacizumab injection (Avastin®; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) as a single agent for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) with progressive disease following prior therapy. The approval was based on durable objective responses (independent radiologic review with stable or decreasing corticosteroid use). Two trials evaluating bevacizumab, 10 mg/kg by i.v. infusion every 2 weeks, were submitted. One trial also randomized patients to bevacizumab plus irinotecan treatment. All patients had received prior surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide. Patients with active brain hemorrhage were excluded. One trial enrolled 78 independently confirmed GBM patients. Partial responses were observed in 25.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.0%-36.1%) of the patients. The median response duration was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.0-5.7 months). The second trial enrolled 56GBMpatients. Partial responses were observed in 19.6% (95% CI, 10.9%-31.3%) of the patients. The median response duration was 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.4-17.4 months). Safety data were provided for the first study. The most frequently reported bevacizumab adverse events of any grade were infection, fatigue, headache, hypertension, epistaxis, and diarrhea. Grade 3-5 bevacizumab-related adverse events included bleeding/hemorrhage, central nervous system (CNS) hemorrhage, hypertension, venous and arterial thromboembolic events, wound-healing complications, proteinuria, gastrointestinal perforation, and reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy. The attribution of certain adverse events (e.g., CNS hemorrhage, wound-healing complications, and thromboembolic events) to either bevacizumab, underlying disease, or both could not be determined because of the single-arm, noncomparative study design. The Oncologist 2009;14:1131-1138 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On September 26, 2008, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved pemetrexed injection (Alimta® Injection; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) for use in combination with cisplatin for the initial treatment of patients with stage IIIB/IV nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A randomized, phase III, open-label study was conducted in 1,725 patients. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 21-day cycles of pemetrexed plus cisplatin (AC) or gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC). The primary objective was overall survival. The median survival time was 10.3 months in both the AC arm and the GC arm (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 -1.05). The median progression-free survival times were 4.8 and 5.1 months for the AC and GC arms, respectively (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.94 -1.15). The overall response rates were 27.1% and 24.7% for the AC and GC arms, respectively. A prespecified analysis of the impact of NSCLC histology on overall survival was conducted. In the nonsquamous NSCLC subgroup, the median survival times were 11.0 and 10.1 months in the AC and GC groups, respectively (unadjusted HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96). However, in the squamous cell histology subgroup, the median survival times were 9.4 versus 10.8 months in the AC and GC groups, respectively (unadjusted HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.99 -1.50). This unfavorable effect of squamous histology on overall survival was also noted in a retrospective analysis of a trial that compared pemetrexed with docetaxel in NSCLC patients who received prior chemotherapy. No new pemetrexed safety signals were observed. The Oncologist 2009;14:930-935 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On September 27, 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted accelerated approval to panitumumab (Vectibix™; Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA) for the treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-- expressing, metastatic colorectal carcinoma with disease progression on or following fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-containing chemotherapy regimens. Accelerated approval was based on demonstration of a beneficial effect on progression-free survival (PFS). The present submission summarizes a second clinical trial, to be included in the panitumumab package insert in June 2008, of chemotherapy and bevacizumab with and without panitumumab in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The study was closed when inferior PFS and greater toxicity were demonstrated at the time of the planned interim efficacy analysis. Patients receiving panitumumab in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy experienced a higher incidence of death (9% versus 4%) and a higher risk for grade 3 and 4 toxicities than patients receiving bevacizumab and chemotherapy alone. The incidences of any Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs) were 87% and 72% in the panitumumab and control groups, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 AEs occurring more commonly in panitumumab-treated patients included rash/acneiform dermatitis, diarrhea, dehydration, primarily resulting from diarrhea, hypokalemia, stomatitis/mucositis, and pulmonary embolism. The addition of panitumumab to bevacizumab and chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer was harmful when compared with bevacizumab and chemotherapy alone. The use of panitumumab in this setting cannot be recommended. The Oncologist 2009;14:284--290 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of the present application was to fulfill a postmarketing commitment to provide long-term efficacy and safety data on treatment with imatinib mesylate (Gleevec®; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ) in patients with CD117+ unresectable and/or metastatic malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). In addition, this application also provides evidence to support a change in the label to allow for an escalation of imatinib dosing to 800 mg/day for patients with progressive disease on a lower dose. Two open-label, controlled, multicenter, intergroup, international, randomized phase III studies were submitted-- one conducted by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (n = 946) and the other by the Southwest Oncology Group (n = 746). These studies compared 400 mg/day of imatinib with 800 mg/day of imatinib. A combined analysis of the two studies was prospectively defined and agreed to by both groups. Both protocols allowed patients randomized to the 400-mg/day imatinib arm to cross over to 800 mg/ day imatinib at progression. Objective responses were achieved in >50% of patients receiving either imatinib dose. The median progression-free survival time was approximately 20 months and the median overall survival (OS) time was approximately 49 months. In the combined analysis, 347 patients crossed over to 800 mg/day imatinib at the time of progression. The median OS time after crossover was 14.3 months. The most common adverse events (AEs) were fluid retention, nausea, fatigue, skin rash, gastrointestinal complaints, and myalgia. The most common laboratory abnormality was anemia. Most often the AEs were of mild-to-moderate severity. Fluid retention events and skin rash were numerically reported more often in the 800-mg/day treatment cohort of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On March 13, 2007, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved lapatinib (Tykerb® tablets; Glaxo- SmithKline, Philadelphia), an oral, small molecule, dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor of ErbB-2 and ErbB-1, for use in combination with capecitabine for the treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer who had received prior therapy including an anthracycline, a taxane, and trastuzumab. One multicenter, open-label, randomized trial was submitted. Eligible patients had stage IIIb or IV breast cancer, ErbB-2 overexpression (immunohistochemistry 3+ or 2+ with fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmation), measurable disease, a 0 or 1 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, a cardiac ejection fraction within the institutional normal range, and adequate laboratory function. Patients received either lapatinib (1,250 mg once daily on days 1-21) plus capecitabine (1,000 mg/m² every 12 hours on days 1-14) every 21 days or capecitabine alone (1,250 mg/m² every 12 hours on days 1-14) every 21 days. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP) determined by a blinded independent review panel. After TTP results of a prespecified interim analysis were made available, study enrollment was discontinued (399 patients enrolled). The median TTP was 27.1 versus 18.6 weeks (hazard ratio, 0.57; p=.00013) favoring the lapatinib plus capecitabine arm. Response rates were 23.7% (lapatinib plus capecitabine) versus 13.9% (capecitabine alone). Survival data were not mature. Although the toxicities observed in the lapatinib and capecitabine combination arm were generally similar to those in the capecitabine alone arm, a higher incidence of diarrhea and rash was noted with the combination. Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions that occurred with a frequency of >5% in patients on the combination arm were diarrhea (13%) and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (12%). There was a 2% incidence of reversible decreased left ventricular function in the combination arm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On March 16, 2007, eculizumab (Soliris®; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Cheshire, CT), a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the human C5 complement protein, received accelerated approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) to reduce hemolysis. Eculizumab was studied in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in 87 RBC transfusion--dependent adult PNH patients and in a supportive single-arm study in 96 patients. The eculizumab dose was 600 mg as a 35-minute i.v. infusion administered weekly for the first 4 weeks followed by 900 mg (week 5) then 900 mg every 14 days thereafter. Hemoglobin stabilized in 21 of 43 (48.8%) eculizumab-treated patients, compared with none of 44 placebo-treated patients. Eculizumab-treated patients required significantly fewer RBC transfusions than placebo-treated patients (median, 0 versus 10 units). There was also a significant reduction in the serum lactate dehydrogenase area under the curve with eculizumab compared with placebo treatment. Results of the phase II supportive study were similar to those of the phase III study. The safety database included 196 adult patients with PNH. Significant findings included the development of human anti-human antibody responses in three patients and serious meningococcal infections in three patients. Patients should undergo meningococcal vaccination at least 2 weeks prior to receiving the first eculizumab treatment and have revaccination according to current medical guidelines. Patients must be monitored and evaluated immediately for early signs of meningococcal infections and treated with antibiotics as indicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose. To describe the clinical trials leading to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of nelarabine (Arranon®), a new purine analogue, for the treatment of patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) whose disease has not responded to or has relapsed following treatment with at least two chemotherapy regimens. Experimental Design. Two phase II trials, one conducted in pediatric patients and the other in adult patients, were reviewed. Patients were in their first or subsequent relapse and/or were refractory to first-line therapy. The dose and schedule of i.v. nelarabine in the pediatric and adult studies were 650 mg/m² per day daily for 5 days and 1,500 mg/m² i.v. on days 1, 3, and 5, respectively. Treatments were repeated every 21 days. Study endpoints were the rates of complete response (CR) and CR with incomplete hematologic or bone marrow recovery (CR*). Results. The pediatric efficacy population consisted of 39 patients who had relapsed after, or had been refractory to, two or more induction regimens. CR to nelarabine treatment was observed in five patients (13%) and CR+CR* was observed in nine patients (23%). The adult efficacy population consisted of 28 patients. CR to nelarabine treatment was observed in five patients (18%) and CR+CR* was observed in six patients (21%). Neurologic toxicity was dose limiting for both pediatric and adult patients. Other severe toxicities included hematologic, hepatic, and metabolic laboratory abnormalities in pediatric patients and gastrointestinal and pulmonary toxicities in adults. Conclusions. On October 28, 2005, the FDA granted accelerated approval for nelarabine for treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory T-ALL/T-LBL after at least two prior regimens. This use is based on the induction of CR. The applicant will conduct postmarketing clinical trials to demonstrate clinical benefit, for example, survival prolongation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On October 6, 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted regular approval to vorinostat (Zolinza®; Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in patients with progressive, persistent, or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies. The pivotal study supporting approval was a single-arm open-label phase II trial that enrolled 74 patients with stage IB and higher CTCL who had failed two systemic therapies (one of which must have contained bexarotene). Patients received vorinostat at a dose of 400 mg orally once daily, which could be reduced for toxicity to 300 mg daily or 300 mg 5 days a week. The median age of patients was 61 years. Sixty-one patients (82%) had stage IIB or higher CTCL and 30 patients (41%) had Sézary syndrome. The median duration of protocol treatment was 118 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response assessed by the Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool. The objective response rate was 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.7%-41.5%), the estimated median response duration was 168 days, and the median time to tumor progression was 202 days. An additional single-center study enrolled 33 patients with similar baseline and demographic features as the pivotal trial. Thirteen of the 33 received vorinostat (400 mg/day). The response rate in these 13 patients was 31% (95% CI, 9.1%-61.4%). The most common clinical adverse events (AEs) of any grade were diarrhea (52%), fatigue (52%), nausea (41%), and anorexia (24%). Grade 3 or 4 clinical AEs included fatigue (4%) and pulmonary embolism (5%). Hematologic laboratory abnormalities included thrombocytopenia (26%) and anemia (14%). Chemistry laboratory abnormalities included increased creatinine (16%), increased serum glucose (69%), and proteinuria (51%). Most abnormalities were National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 1 or 2. Grade 3 or greater chemistry abnormalities included hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and hyperuricemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, hypercholesterolemia, hypophosphatemia, and increased creatinine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On July 24, 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted approval to pegaspargase (Oncaspar®; Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bridgewater, NJ; hereafter, O) for the first-line treatment of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) as a component of a multiagent chemotherapy regimen. O was previously approved in February 1994 for the treatment of patients with ALL who were hypersensitive to native forms of L-asparaginase. The trial supporting this new indication was an open label, randomized, multicenter clinical trial that enrolled 118 children (age, 1-9 years) with previously untreated, standard risk ALL. Patients received either native Escherichia coli asparaginase (Elspar®; Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ; hereafter, E) or O along with multiagent chemotherapy during remission induction and delayed intensification (DI) phases of treatment. O, at a dose of 2,500 IU/m², was administered i.m. on day 3 of the 4-week induction phase and on day 3 of each of two 8-week DI phases. E, at a dose of 6,000 IU/m², was administered i.m. three times weekly for nine doses during induction and for six doses during each DI phase. This study allowed direct comparison of O and E for asparagine depletion, asparaginase activity, and development of asparaginase antibodies. An unplanned comparison of event-free survival (EFS) was conducted to rule out a deleterious O efficacy effect. Following induction and DI treatment there was complete (≤1 µM) or moderate (1-10 µM) depletion of serum asparagine levels in the large majority of samples tested over the 4-week period in both O-treated and E-treated subjects. Similarly, depletion of cerebrospinal fluid asparagine levels during induction was similar between O-treated and E-treated subjects. The number of days asparaginase activity exceeded >0.03 IU/ml in O-treated subjects was greater than the number of days in E-treated subjects during both the induction and DI phases of treatment. There was no correlation, however, between asparaginase activity and serum asparagine levels, making the former determination less clinically relevant. Using the protocol-prespecified threshold for a positive result of >2.5 times the control, 7 of 56 (12%) O subjects tested at any time during the study demonstrated antiasparaginase antibodies and 16 of 57 (28%) E subjects tested at any time during the study had anti-asparaginase antibodies. In both study arms EFS was in the range of 80% at 3 years. The most serious, sometimes fatal, O toxicities were anaphylaxis, other serious allergic reactions, thrombosis (including sagittal sinus thrombosis), pancreatitis, glucose intolerance, and coagulopathy. The most common adverse events were allergic reactions (including anaphylaxis), hyperglycemia, pancreatitis, central nervous system thrombosis, coagulopathy, hyperbilirubinemia, and elevated transaminases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On October 11, 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted approval for bevacizumab (Avastin®; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA), administered in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, for the initial treatment of patients with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic, nonsquamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Approval is based on a significant improvement in overall survival (OS). A randomized, open label, multicenter clinical trial, conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), in chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IIIB/IV nonsquamous NSCLC, evaluated bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (BV/CP, n = 434) versus carboplatin and paclitaxel alone (CP, n = 444). Exclusion of patients with squamous or predominantly squamous histology was based on life-threatening or fatal hemoptysis occurring in 4 of 13 patients with squamous histology who received a BV/CP regimen in a phase II study. Among the 878 randomized patients, the median age was 63, 46% were female, 76% had stage IV disease, 12% had stage IIIB disease with malignant pleural effusion, 11% had recurrent disease, and 40% had an ECOG performance status score of 0. OS was significantly longer in patients receiving BV/CP than in those receiving CP alone (median OS, 12.3 versus 10.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; p = .013, stratified log rank test). Although a consistent effect was observed across most subgroups, in an exploratory analysis, evidence of a survival benefit was not observed in women (HR, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.25). Severe and life-threatening adverse events occurring more frequently in patients receiving BV/CP were neutropenia (27% versus 17%), fatigue (16% versus 13%), hypertension (8% versus 0.7%), infection without neutropenia (7% versus 3%), thrombosis/embolism (5% versus 3%), pneumonitis or pulmonary infiltrate (5% versus 3%), infection with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (5% versus 2%), febrile neutropenia (5% versus 2%), hyponatremia (4% versus 1%), proteinuria (3% versus 0), and headache (3% versus 0.5%). Fatal, treatment-related adverse events in patients receiving bevacizumab were pulmonary hemorrhage (2.3% versus 0.5%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage, central nervous system infarction, gastrointestinal perforation, myocardial infarction, and neutropenic sepsis. The most serious, and sometimes fatal, bevacizumab toxicities are gastrointestinal perforation, wound healing complications, hemorrhage, arterial thromboembolic events, hypertensive crisis, nephrotic syndrome, congestive heart failure, and neutropenic sepsis. The most common adverse events in patients receiving bevacizumab are asthenia, pain, abdominal pain, headache, hypertension, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, stomatitis, constipation, upper respiratory infection, epistaxis, dyspnea, exfoliative dermatitis, and proteinuria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On September 27, 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted approval to panitumumab (Vectibix™, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA) for the treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing, metastatic colorectal carcinoma with disease progression on or following fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-containing chemotherapy regimens. Panitumumab approval is based on the results of a single, open-label, randomized, multinational study that enrolled 463 patients with EGFR-expressing (at least 1 + membrane staining in ≥1% of tumor cells) metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients were randomized to either best supportive care (BSC) alone or BSC plus panitumumab, 6 mg/kg i.v., every other week. The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), determined by an independent review committee that was blinded as to treatment assignment. BSC patients who progressed were eligible to receive panitumumab. The study patients' median age was 62 years, with 40% aged ≥65; 63% were male, 99% were white, 86% had a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, and 67% had colon cancer. The median time from diagnosis of metastases was approximately 19 months and the median number of prior therapies was 2.4. The PFS duration was significantly longer among patients randomized to receive panitumumab in addition to BSC (n=231) compared with BSC alone (n=232). The median and mean PFS times were 56 and 96.4 days, respectively, for patients receiving panitumumab and 51 and 59.7 days, respectively, for patients receiving BSC alone. Nineteen partial responses (8%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3%-12.5%) were observed in panitumumab treated patients. The median duration of response was 17 weeks (95% CI, 16-25 weeks). Approximately 75% of patients in the BSC alone arm crossed over to receive panitumumab after disease progression. There was no difference in overall survival between the two study arms. The most common adverse events were skin rash, hypomagnesemia, paronychia, fatigue, abdominal pain, nausea, and diarrhea. The most serious adverse events were pulmonary fibrosis, severe dermatologic toxicity complicated by infectious sequelae and septic death, infusion reactions, abdominal pain, hypomagnesemia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On June 20, 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved bevacizumab (Avastin® Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA), administered in combination with FOLFOX4 (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) for the second-line treatment of metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum. Efficacy and safety were demonstrated in one Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) open-label, multicenter, randomized, three-arm, active-controlled trial enrolling 829 adult patients. Patients had received a fluoropyrimidine- and irinotecan-based regimen as initial therapy for metastatic disease; or they had received prior adjuvant irinotecan-based chemotherapy and had recurred within 6 months of completing therapy. Treatments included bevacizumab, 10 mg/kg, as a 90-minute i.v. infusion on day 1, every 2 weeks, either alone or in combination with FOLFOX4, or FOLFOX4 alone. The bevacizumab monotherapy arm was closed to accrual after an interim efficacy analysis suggested a possibly shorter survival in that arm. Overall survival (OS), the primary study endpoint, was significantly longer for patients receiving bevacizumab in combination with FOLFOX4 than for those receiving FOLFOX4 alone. The objective response rate was significantly higher in the FOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab arm than in the FOLFOX4 alone arm. The duration of response was approximately 6 months for both treatment arms. Patients treated with the bevacizumab combination were also reported, based on investigator assessment, to have significantly longer progression-free survival. There were no new bevacizumab safety signals. The most serious, and sometimes fatal, bevacizumab toxicities are gastrointestinal perforation, wound-healing complications, hemorrhage, arterial thromboembolic events, hypertensive crisis, nephrotic syndrome, and congestive heart failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast and cervix cancer screening behaviors, while suboptimal in all Americans, are of particular concern in minority females. Little is known about cancer knowledge and screening behavior in Southeast Asian populations in the United States. We interviewed 38 Southeast Asian women of Cambodian or Vietnamese origin living in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, area. A telephone interview was conducted bybilingual/biculturalinterviewers. Seventy-one percent (95% confidence interval [CI], 54% to 85%) of women in the study did not know what cancer was and 74% were unable to identify a cancer prevention strategy. Greater knowledge about cancer and identification of preventive measures were associated with employment outside the home, more years of education, and age, but not with length of time in the United States. Cancer education programs need to identify the patient's level of knowledge about cancer, elicit and respectfully address beliefs about causality and prevention, and ensure that health information is provided in a language understandable to the patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]