Search

Objectives: Limited studies are available on the accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs) for full‐arch implant and tooth models. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of maxillary full‐arch digital impressions of tooth and implant models made by two IOSs. Materials and Methods: This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on two maxillary dentiform models: one with six prepared natural teeth and the other with six implants at the site of canine, first premolar, and first molar teeth, bilaterally. A highly accurate industrial scanner was used for actual measurements on the models that served as the reference scan. TS (Trios3) and CO (CEREC Omnicam) IOSs were then used to scan each model 10 times according to the manufacturer's instructions. All scans were saved in STL format. The GOM Inspect software was used according to the best‐fit algorithm to compare the accuracy of measurements in the groups with the reference scan. The trueness and precision were calculated. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS by one‐way analysis of variance and t‐test (α =.05). Results: TS showed a significantly higher trueness than CO for both tooth and implant models (p <.05). TS also revealed significantly higher precision than CO for the tooth model; however, the difference in precision for the implant model was not significant between the two IOSs (p >.05). Conclusions: TS showed higher accuracy than CO in both tooth and implant models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. This study aimed to evaluate the final color of restorations with three different core materials (Co–Cr, Zirconia, and PEEK) veneered with heat-pressed ceramic or CAD/CAM composite. Methods. Forty cores in the form of square with dimensions of 10 × 10 mm and thickness of 0.5 mm were milled from Zirconia and Co–Cr blocks and were veneered with either A2 shade CAD/CAM composite resin or heat-press ceramic (n = 10). Ten samples from polyetheretherketone blocks were only veneered with composite resins. A2 shade veneer material with 2 mm served as control for color evaluation of samples. Color parameters were measured by spectrophotometer. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test. Results. The mean color differences between Co–Cr, Zirconia and PEEK samples veneered with composite and the control sample were 2.91 (±0.45), 3.24 (±0.33), and 2.75 (±0.35) and for Co–Cr and Zirconia in ceramic groups were 6.46 (±0.32) and 1.97 (±0.19), respectively. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test showed a significant difference between the core groups veneered with ceramic (P ≤ 0.001). The type of core material in the composite veneered samples, however, did not make a significant difference (P = 0.186). All groups except for Co–Cr-ceramic showed clinically acceptable results (ΔE < 3.7). Conclusion. Type of core material presented significant effect on the final color of restorations when ceramic was used as a veneer material. Conversely, the final color of composite veneer restorations is not affected by the core type. CAD/CAM composites can provide adequate color coverage for different core materials without exceeding a minimum clinically acceptable thickness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The prevalence of using different esthetic methods increases the possibility of close contact between them with potential adverse interactions. This study aimed to compare the surface changes (microhardness and roughness) in two types of feldspathic porcelain after laser bleaching and post-bleach polishing. Methods: 12 standardized rectangular specimens were prepared for each porcelain group (conventionally layered and CAD-CAM milled). Vickers microhardness and roughness were evaluated before and after the bleaching procedure and after polishing. Data were statistically analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and t test (P < 0.05). Results: The surface roughness of both groups increased significantly after laser bleaching (P < 0.001 for conventional and P = 0.004 for CAD-CAM porcelains). The polishing process reduced the roughness of both groups; the reduction was significant in conventional specimens (P = 0.020). The surface hardness values did not change significantly in the groups after bleaching and post-bleach polishing stages (P = 0.142). Generally, the average surface roughness of CAD-CAM specimens was significantly lower (P < 0.001), and the surface microhardness of the CAD-CAM group was significantly higher than conventional porcelains (P = 0.011). Conclusion: Laser bleaching significantly increased the surface roughness of feldspathic porcelains; however, it did not affect the surface microhardness significantly. Unlike CAD-CAM specimens, polishing significantly improved the surface smoothness of conventional porcelains. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The present study aimed to evaluate the color and translucency changes of the feldspathic porcelain samples made using the conventional or computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) methods after immersion in staining solutions and laser bleaching. Materials and Methods: A total of 72 samples of feldspathic porcelain were fabricated using the conventional (n = 36) or CAD/CAM (n = 36) methods. Afterward, each group was randomly divided into three subgroups (n = 12), which underwent exposure to coffee, orange juice, or distilled water for 6 weeks. Then, the samples underwent diode laser-assisted bleaching. A spectrophotometer assessed the samples' color and translucency preintervention, after staining, and after bleaching. Statistical Analysis Used: One-way and two-way analysis of variance and independent t-test were used. The significance level was 0.05. Results: Staining for 6 weeks significantly changed the color of both types of feldspathic porcelains. Furthermore, there were significant differences between the ceramics made using different methods and immersed in different staining solutions (P < 0.001). Furthermore, laser-assisted bleaching changed the color of immersed specimens significantly (P = 0.005). However, there were no significant translucency changes in all the subgroups after staining (P = 0.215) and laser bleaching (P = 0.325). Conclusions: The staining-induced discoloration of all the subgroups was in the clinically acceptable range (ΔΕ<3.3). In addition, bleaching could effectively remove the stains in both types of ceramics while not affecting the primary color. Moreover, the translucency of the ceramics was not affected by staining or laser-assisted bleaching. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The prevalence of using different esthetic methods increases the possibility of close contact between them with potential adverse interactions. This study aimed to compare the surface changes (microhardness and roughness) in two types of feldspathic porcelain after laser bleaching and post-bleach polishing. Methods: 12 standardized rectangular specimens were prepared for each porcelain group (conventionally layered and CAD-CAM milled). Vickers microhardness and roughness were evaluated before and after the bleaching procedure and after polishing. Data were statistically analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and t test ( P  < 0.05). Results: The surface roughness of both groups increased significantly after laser bleaching ( P  < 0.001 for conventional and P =0.004 for CAD-CAM porcelains). The polishing process reduced the roughness of both groups; the reduction was significant in conventional specimens ( P =0.020). The surface hardness values did not change significantly in the groups after bleaching and post-bleach polishing stages ( P =0.142). Generally, the average surface roughness of CAD-CAM specimens was significantly lower ( P  < 0.001), and the surface microhardness of the CAD-CAM group was significantly higher than conventional porcelains ( P =0.011). Conclusion: Laser bleaching significantly increased the surface roughness of feldspathic porcelains; however, it did not affect the surface microhardness significantly. Unlike CAD-CAM specimens, polishing significantly improved the surface smoothness of conventional porcelains., (Copyright © 2022 J Lasers Med Sci.)