12 results on '"Cheetham, Shelley"'
Search Results
2. The Improving Rural Cancer Outcomes (IRCO) Trial: a factorial cluster-randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce time to diagnosis in rural cancer patients in Western Australia: Abstract O-39
- Author
-
Emery, Jon D., Gray, Victoria, Walter, Fiona M., Cheetham, Shelley, Croager, Emma J., Slevin, Terry, Saunders, Christobel, Threlfall, Tim, Auret, Kirsten, Nowak, Anna K., Geelhoed, Elizabeth, Bulsara, Max, and Holman, DʼArcy C J
- Published
- 2015
3. A novel approach to improve recruitment of cancer patients: experience from the Improving Rural Cancer Outcomes Trial: Abstract O-07
- Author
-
Gray, Victoria, Holman, DʼArcy, Cheetham, Shelley, Slevin, Terry, Threlfall, Tim, Croager, Emma, and Emery, Jon
- Published
- 2015
4. Exploring treatment decision‐making in cancer management for rural residents: Patient and provider perspectives on a recently established regional radiotherapy service.
- Author
-
Birch, Eleanor M., Haigh, Margaret M., Lyford, Marilyn, Thompson, Sandra C., Baxi, Siddhartha, Cheetham, Shelley, and Shahid, Shaouli
- Subjects
CANCER-related mortality ,CANCER treatment ,RADIOTHERAPY ,DECISION making in clinical medicine ,TREATMENT effectiveness - Abstract
Abstract: Aim: The aim of this study was to examine stakeholders' views of how the establishment of the South West Radiation Oncology Service in Bunbury, Western Australia, has affected treatment decision‐making, and the extent to which patients are involved in the decision‐making process. Methods: Semi‐structured in‐depth interviews were undertaken with 21 service providers involved in the treatment and care of people with cancer, and 17 adults diagnosed with cancer who opted to undergo radiotherapy (RT) treatment at the Service. Data were subject to thematic analysis using the qualitative data analysis software NVivo 10. Results: Patients were overwhelmingly positive about their experiences at the Service, praising the quality of the care provided and noting the convenience associated with receiving treatment locally. Most patients reported feeling involved in decision‐making, but tended to rely on and generally adopt advice from medical professionals regarding type and location of treatment. Although service providers in the region had become more aware of the regional RT service and referrals had increased, some patients continued to travel to the metropolitan area for treatment. Reasons identified for this included the need for more specialized RT treatment and the more extensive range of allied health services offered. Conclusion: Increased convenience and a lower financial burden are key reasons why rural cancer patients prefer treatment at a regional RT service rather than travelling to metropolitan centers. These factors highlight the need for ongoing improvement in access to local RT services so that disparities in cancer outcomes between rural and metropolitan patients are reduced. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. An Exploration of Underrepresentation of Aboriginal Cancer Patients Attending a Regional Radiotherapy Service in Western Australia.
- Author
-
Lyford, Marilyn, Haigh, Margaret M., Baxi, Siddhartha, Cheetham, Shelley, Shahid, Shaouli, and Thompson, Sandra C.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. The enablers, barriers and preferences of accessing radiation therapy facilities in the rural developed world - a systematic review.
- Author
-
Thompson, Sandra C., Cheetham, Shelley, and Baxi, Siddhartha
- Subjects
- *
CANCER radiotherapy , *SYSTEMATIC reviews , *HEALTH policy , *HEALTH services accessibility , *MEDICAL literature , *TUMOR treatment , *RADIOTHERAPY , *RURAL health services , *SURVEYS , *TUMORS ,DEVELOPED countries - Abstract
Background: Utilisation of radiation therapy for regional Australia and around the world has been the focus of much health policy the last decade. Radiation therapy centres have been built in Australian regional and rural areas to improve access to radiation therapy and reduce the tyranny of distance as a barrier to access. After this the enablers, barriers and perceptions of patients has been evaluated to determine utilisation once centres have been built. Thisreview looks the impact of rural radiation services in the developed world, barriers and enablers of establishing a rural radiation centre, and patients' and service providers' perspectives and preferences around the uptake of rural radiation therapy.Methods: Online search of peer reviewed literature was undertaken using MeSH terms relating to the topic. Inclusion criteria were regional radiation therapy centres in developing countries, any year of publication, in English, and qualitative or quantitative methodologies. Articles were reviewed by two authors with conflicts discussed with a third.Results: Twenty three studies addressed the theme directly. Distance barriers have been overcome by building regional centres and health economic burden was lower for government service providers with this strategy. However distance still plays an important role in influencing uptake of radiation therapy. Cultural expectations, influence of the family doctor and perception of care was influential. Carer support, duration of displacement from home, financial impact of the required care and seasonal weather were practical factors on a patient's decision.Conclusions: Regional radiation therapy centres have improved access to radiation therapy in developing countries. However the complex nuances between socio-economic, cultural and health system factors that influence regional patient's decision making bears further consideration, as distance is not the only issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. The Improving Rural Cancer Outcomes Trial: a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce time to diagnosis in rural cancer patients in Western Australia.
- Author
-
Emery, Jon D, Gray, Victoria, Walter, Fiona M, Cheetham, Shelley, Croager, Emma J, Slevin, Terry, Saunders, Christobel, Threlfall, Timothy, Auret, Kirsten, Nowak, Anna K, Geelhoed, Elizabeth, Bulsara, Max, and Holman, C D'Arcy J
- Subjects
TUMOR diagnosis ,GENERAL practitioners ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,MEDICAL education ,PATIENT education ,RESEARCH ,RURAL population ,EVALUATION research ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,EARLY detection of cancer ,EDUCATION - Abstract
Background: Rural Australians have poorer survival for most common cancers, due partially to later diagnosis. Internationally, several initiatives to improve cancer outcomes have focused on earlier presentation to healthcare and timely diagnosis. We aimed to measure the effect of community-based symptom awareness and general practice-based educational interventions on the time to diagnosis in rural patients presenting with breast, prostate, colorectal or lung cancer in Western Australia.Methods: 2 × 2 factorial cluster randomised controlled trial. Community Intervention: cancer symptom awareness campaign tailored for rural Australians. GP intervention: resource card with symptom risk assessment charts and local cancer referral pathways implemented through multiple academic detailing visits. Trial Area A received the community symptom awareness and Trial Area B acted as the community campaign control region. Within both Trial Areas general practices were randomised to the GP intervention or control.Primary Outcome: total diagnostic interval (TDI).Results: 1358 people with incident breast, prostate, colorectal or lung cancer were recruited. There were no significant differences in the median or ln mean TDI at either intervention level (community intervention vs control: median TDI 107.5 vs 92 days; ln mean difference 0.08 95% CI -0.06-0.23 P=0.27; GP intervention vs control: median TDI 97 vs 96.5 days; ln mean difference 0.004 95% CI -0.18-0.19 P=0.99). There were no significant differences in the TDI when analysed by factorial design, tumour group or sub-intervals of the TDI.Conclusions: This is the largest trial to test the effect of community campaign or GP interventions on timeliness of cancer diagnosis. We found no effect of either intervention. This may reflect limited dose of the interventions, or the limited duration of follow-up. Alternatively, these interventions do not have a measurable effect on time to cancer diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. The Improving Rural Cancer Outcomes (IRCO) Trial: a factorial cluster-randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce time to diagnosis in rural patients with cancer in Western Australia: a study protocol.
- Author
-
Emery, Jon D., Gray, Victoria, Walter, Fiona M., Cheetham, Shelley, Croager, Emma J., Slevin, Terry, Saunders, Christobel, Threlfall, Tim, Auret, Kirsten, Nowak, Anna K., Geelhoed, Elizabeth, Bulsara, Max, and Holman, C. D'Arcy J.
- Abstract
Introduction: While overall survival for most common cancers in Australia is improving, the rural--urban differential has been widening, with significant excess deaths due to lung, colorectal, breast and prostate cancer in regional Australia. Internationally a major focus on understanding variations in cancer outcomes has been later presentation to healthcare and later diagnosis. Approaches to reducing time to diagnosis of symptomatic cancer include public symptom awareness campaigns and interventions in primary care to improve early cancer detection. This paper reports the protocol of a factorial cluster-randomised trial of community and general practice (GP) level interventions to reduce the time to diagnosis of cancer in rural Western Australia (WA). Methods and analysis: The community intervention is a symptom awareness campaign tailored for rural Australians delivered through a community engagement model. The GP intervention includes a resource card with symptom risk assessment charts and local referral pathways implemented through multiple academic detailing visits and case studies. Participants are eligible if recently diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung or prostate cancer who reside in specific regions of rural WA with a planned sample size of 1350. The primary outcome is the Total Diagnostic Interval, defined as the duration from first symptom (or date of cancer screening test) to cancer diagnosis. Secondary outcomes include cancer stage, healthcare utilisation, disease-free status, survival at 2 and 5 years and cost-effectiveness. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval has been granted by the University of Western Australia and from all relevant hospital recruitment sites in WA. Results: Results of this trial will be reported in peer-reviewed publications and in conference presentations. Trial registration number: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR). ACTRN12610000872033. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Cancer support services: Are they meeting the needs of rural radiotherapy patients?
- Author
-
Haigh, Margaret M., Baxi, Siddhartha, Lyford, Marilyn, Cheetham, Shelley, and Thompson, Sandra C.
- Subjects
CANCER patient medical care ,CANCER patient psychology ,ENDOWMENTS ,HEALTH care teams ,HEALTH services accessibility ,INTERPROFESSIONAL relations ,INTERVIEWING ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL care ,RURAL conditions ,STATISTICAL sampling ,SUPPORT groups ,TRAVEL ,TUMORS ,ACCESSIBLE design of public spaces ,QUALITATIVE research ,SOCIAL support ,THEMATIC analysis ,DATA analysis software ,PATIENTS' attitudes - Abstract
This paper examines the supportive care in place to meet the needs of patients receiving radiotherapy at a regional oncology service in Bunbury, Western Australia. Semi‐structured in‐depth interviews with 21 service providers and 17 adults diagnosed with cancer who underwent radiotherapy at the Service were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. Key themes relevant were co‐operation and collaboration of interdisciplinary team members; support from organisations to assist with accommodation, transport, emotional support and provision of practical assistance, as well as barriers to accessing support. Most participants were positive about the support available, recognising the needs of rural radiotherapy patients for assistance with travel, accommodation and psychosocial support to help deal with the stressors they face. Collaboration between the various service providers maximised the support available to patients but the drop off in psychosocial support once the intensity of treatment was completed was identified as a weakness in the support available. The support system, established around a regional radiotherapy service, was enhanced by the collaborative professional relationships developed among service providers. The service extends beyond clinical service delivery by recognising financial, logistical and psychosocial support needs, factors to be considered to ensure rural radiotherapy patients are provided with holistic care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. The Improving Rural Cancer Outcomes Trial: a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce time to diagnosis in rural cancer patients in Western Australia.
- Author
-
Emery, Jon D, Gray, Victoria, Walter, Fiona M, Cheetham, Shelley, Croager, Emma J, Slevin, Terry, Saunders, Christobel, Threlfall, Timothy, Auret, Kirsten, Nowak, Anna K, Geelhoed, Elizabeth, Bulsara, Max, and Holman, C D'Arcy J
- Abstract
This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.310. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Education and training for preventing sharps injuries and splash exposures in healthcare workers.
- Author
-
Cheetham S, Ngo HT, Liira J, and Liira H
- Subjects
- Controlled Before-After Studies, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Interrupted Time Series Analysis, Needlestick Injuries epidemiology, Needlestick Injuries prevention & control, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Wounds, Stab epidemiology, Blood-Borne Infections prevention & control, Health Personnel education, Occupational Exposure prevention & control, Wounds, Stab prevention & control
- Abstract
Background: In healthcare settings, health care workers (HCWs) are at risk of acquiring infectious diseases through sharps injuries and splash exposures to blood or bodily fluids. Education and training interventions are widely used to protect workers' health and safety and to prevent sharps injuries. In certain countries, they are part of obligatory professional development for HCWs., Objectives: To assess the effects of education and training interventions compared to no intervention or alternative interventions for preventing sharps injuries and splash exposures in HCWs., Search Methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, NHSEED, Science Citation Index Expanded, CINAHL and OSH-update (from all time until February 2016). In addition, we searched the databases of Global Health, AustHealth and Web of Science (from all time until February 2016). The original search strategy was re-run in November 2019, and again in February 2020. In April 2020, the search strategy was updated and run in CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science (from 2016 to current)., Selection Criteria: We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-randomized trials (cluster-RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), interrupted time series (ITS) study designs, and controlled before-and-after studies (CBA), that evaluated the effect of education and training interventions on the incidence of sharps injuries and splash exposures compared to no-intervention., Data Collection and Analysis: Two authors (SC, HL) independently selected studies, and extracted data for the included studies. Studies were analyzed, risk of bias assessed (HL, JL) , and pooled using random-effect meta-analysis, where applicable, according to their design types. As primary outcome we looked for sharps injuries and splash exposures and calculated them as incidence of injuries per 1000 health care workers per year. For the quality of evidence we applied GRADE for the main outcomes., Main Results: Seven studies met our inclusion criteria: one cluster-RCT, three CCTs, and three ITS studies. The baseline rates of sharps injuries varied from 43 to 203 injuries per 1000 HCWs per year in studies with hospital registry systems. In questionnaire-based studies, the rates of sharps injuries were higher, from 1800 to 7000 injuries per 1000 HCWs per year. The majority of studies utilised a combination of education and training interventions, including interactive demonstrations, educational presentations, web-based information systems, and marketing tools which we found similar enough to be combined. In the only cluster-RCT (n=796) from a high-income country, the single session educational workshop decreased sharps injuries at 12 months follow-up, but this was not statistically significant either measured as registry-based reporting of injuries (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.30, low-quality evidence) or as self-reported injuries (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.21, very low-quality evidence) In three CCTs educational interventions decreased sharps injuries at two months follow-up (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.95, 330 participants, very low-quality evidence). In the meta-analysis of two ITS studies with a similar injury rate, (N=2104), the injury rate decreased immediately post-intervention by 9.3 injuries per 1000 HCWs per year (95% CI -14.9 to -3.8). There was a small non-significant decrease in trend over time post-intervention of 2.3 injuries per 1000 HCWs per year (95% CI -12.4 to 7.8, low-quality evidence). One ITS study (n=255) had a seven-fold higher injury rate compared to the other two ITS studies and only three data points before and after the intervention. The study reported a change in injury rate of 77 injuries per 1000 HCWs (95% CI -117.2 to -37.1, very low-quality evidence) immediately after the intervention, and a decrease in trend post-intervention of 32.5 injuries per 1000 HCWs per year (95% CI -49.6 to -15.4, very low quality evidence). None of the studies allowed analyses of splash exposures separately from sharps injuries. None of the studies reported rates of blood-borne infections in patients or staff. There was very low-quality evidence of short-term positive changes in process outcomes such as knowledge in sharps injuries and behaviors related to injury prevention. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found low- to very low-quality evidence that education and training interventions may cause small decreases in the incidence of sharps injuries two to twelve months after the intervention. There was very low-quality evidence that educational interventions may improve knowledge and behaviors related to sharps injuries in the short term but we are uncertain of this effect. Future studies should focus on developing valid measures of sharps injuries for reliable monitoring. Developing educational interventions in high-risk settings is another priority., (Copyright © 2021 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Exploring treatment decision-making in cancer management for rural residents: Patient and provider perspectives on a recently established regional radiotherapy service.
- Author
-
Birch EM, Haigh MM, Baxi S, Lyford M, Cheetham S, Shahid S, and Thompson SC
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Rural Health Services, Rural Population, Western Australia, Clinical Decision-Making, Delivery of Health Care methods, Neoplasms radiotherapy, Patient Satisfaction, Physicians
- Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to examine stakeholders' views of how the establishment of the South West Radiation Oncology Service in Bunbury, Western Australia, has affected treatment decision-making, and the extent to which patients are involved in the decision-making process., Methods: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were undertaken with 21 service providers involved in the treatment and care of people with cancer, and 17 adults diagnosed with cancer who opted to undergo radiotherapy (RT) treatment at the Service. Data were subject to thematic analysis using the qualitative data analysis software NVivo 10., Results: Patients were overwhelmingly positive about their experiences at the Service, praising the quality of the care provided and noting the convenience associated with receiving treatment locally. Most patients reported feeling involved in decision-making, but tended to rely on and generally adopt advice from medical professionals regarding type and location of treatment. Although service providers in the region had become more aware of the regional RT service and referrals had increased, some patients continued to travel to the metropolitan area for treatment. Reasons identified for this included the need for more specialized RT treatment and the more extensive range of allied health services offered., Conclusion: Increased convenience and a lower financial burden are key reasons why rural cancer patients prefer treatment at a regional RT service rather than travelling to metropolitan centers. These factors highlight the need for ongoing improvement in access to local RT services so that disparities in cancer outcomes between rural and metropolitan patients are reduced., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.