Search

During the last two decades, the imaging landscape of multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved with whole-body imaging techniques such as fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) and MRI replacing X-ray skeletal survey. Both imaging modalities have high diagnostic performance at the initial diagnosis of MM and are key players in the identification of patients needing treatment. Diffusion-weighted MRI has a high sensitivity for bone involvement, while 18F-FDG PET/CT baseline parameters carry a strong prognostic value. The advent of more efficient therapeutics, such as immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors, has called for the use of sensitive imaging techniques for monitoring response to treatment. Diffusion-weighted MRI could improve the specificity of MRI for tumor response evaluation, but questions remain regarding its role as a prognostic factor. Performed at key time points of treatment in newly diagnosed MM patients, 18F-FDG PET/CT showed a strong association with relapse risk and survival. The deployment of minimal residual disease detection at the cellular or the molecular level may raise questions on the role of these imaging techniques, which will be addressed. This review summarizes and outlines the specificities and respective roles of MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the management of MM.

To compare the prognostic values of 18-FDG PET/CT (FDG-PET) and Whole-Body MRI with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (WB-DW-MRI) in the evaluation of treatment response of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients eligible for ASCT. Thirty patients with newly diagnosed MM prospectively underwent FDG-PET and WB-DW-MRI at baseline, after induction chemotherapy and after ASCT. Response on WB-DW-MRI was evaluated with the MY-RADS criteria. FDG-PET was considered positive if residual uptake was superior to liver uptake. Imaging results were not used for treatment modification. The impact of imaging results on PFS was analyzed. After a median follow-up of 32 months, 10 patients relapsed. With WB-DW-MRI, post-induction examination was positive in 3/25 and post-ASCT examination was positive in 3/27 patients. However, neither study showed prognostic impact on PFS. FDG-PET was positive in 5/22 post-induction and 3/26 patients post-ASCT, respectively. Positivity of FDG-PET, post-induction or post-ASCT, was associated with a shorter PFS (post-induction: median PFS 19 months vs. not reached, log-rank p = 0.0089, post-ASCT: median PFS 18 months vs. not reached, log-rank p = 0.0005). Preliminary results from this small, single-center, prospective study show that, whether performed post-induction or post-ASCT, FDG-PET has a higher prognostic value than WB-DW-MRI for treatment response evaluation of newly diagnosed MM.

Background The International Myeloma Working Group recommends the use of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for treatment response evaluation, as it is superior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, at initial staging, the sensitivity of FDG-PET remains inferior to that of MRI. Therefore, there is a need for an imaging technique that could have a sensitivity equal to that of MRI at diagnosis and could serve to evaluate therapy. 18F-choline has shown increased sensitivity when compared with 18-FDG, with about 75% more lesions detected in patients with relapsed or progressive multiple myeloma (MM). Objective Our primary objective is to prospectively compare the detection rate of bone lesions by 18F-choline PET/CT (FCH-PET) and FDG-PET in newly diagnosed MM. Our secondary objectives are to assess the accuracy of both PET modalities for the detection of bone lesions and the diagnosis of diffuse disease, to assess the detection rate of extramedullary lesions. Methods We will prospectively include 30 patients in a paired comparative accuracy study. Patients with de novo MM will undergo FCH-PET, FDG-PET, and whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) within a 3-week period. WB-MRI will be composed of conventional sequences on the spine and pelvis and of whole-body diffusion axial sequences. The following 6 skeletal areas will be defined: skull, sternum/costal grid, spine, pelvis, superior limbs, and inferior limbs. The number of focal lesions, their respective localization, and intensity of uptake will be retrieved for each skeletal area. Readings will be performed blinded from other imaging techniques. The reference standard will be WB-MRI. Focal lesions present on PET/CT but not on WB-MRI will require a decision made with a consensus of experts based on clinical and imaging data. The number of bone lesions and number of extramedullary lesions will be compared using the Wilcoxon test. The accuracy of FCH-PET and FDG-PET will be compared using the McNemar test. Results The study started in September 2019, and enrollment is ongoing. As of June 2020, 8 participants have been included. Data collection is expected to be completed in June 2021, and the results are expected to be available in December 2021. Conclusions This study will assess if FCH-PET is superior to FDG-PET for the evaluation of MM tumor burden. This will pave the way for future prospective evaluations of the prognostic value of 18-FCH for treatment response evaluation in MM patients. Additionally, this work may provide new perspectives for better assessment of the risk of smoldering MM progressing to MM. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03891914; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03891914 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/17850