Search

Introduction: Polypharmacy in patients with advanced cancer represents a major public health problem, leading to risk of iatrogenesis, decrease of quality of life and increase of healthcare costs. In the field of geriatrics, health policies have been developed to address polypharmacy through the use of deprescribing tools. Recently, palliative care initiatives have been introduced, yet these have not fully considered the specificities of this population, particularly their perceptions. It is therefore important to better understand patients' perceptions of deprescribing in order to adapt tools and actions to make these approaches more effective. Objectives: The aim is to investigate patients' perceptions of deprescribing in palliative oncology care, and to explore factors that may influence patients' attitudes and beliefs about deprescribing and to validate a specific questionnaire (rPATD) in this population. An ancillary study will investigate the relationship between patients' health literacy and their perception of deprescribing. Method: A prospective, observational, multicenter study will be conducted using a sequential mixed exploratory design in a population of patients living with advanced cancer and with a physician-estimated life expectancy of less than 1 year. The study will include an initial qualitative phase. Individual semi-structured interviews using a descriptive approach (thematic analysis) will be conducted (upon saturation). Following analysis of the qualitative data, a quantitative study including 300 patients will be realized to meet secondary objectives. Several data will be collected and 2 self-questionnaires will be administered: the BMQ (beliefs about medicine) and rPATD (perception of deprescribing) possibly supplemented by additional items if required by the qualitative analysis. The auxiliary study will be conducted during this second phase, using a validated self-questionnaire to assess patients' level of literacy. Conclusion: The disparate outcomes will facilitate the understanding of the perception of deprescribing in palliative oncology care, enabling the development of tailored approaches adapted to this population. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials Identifier: NCT06193083. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. This study aimed to develop and perform a content validation of a brief French tool for self-assessment of supportive and palliative care needs in patients with cancer, using four different approaches: issue's importance, problem intensity, problem burden, and expressed need for help. Methods. Items, questions, and response scales were based on a literature review and discussions within a multidisciplinary scientific committee. A panel of experts evaluated the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of each item and question using the Delphi method. These properties were also assessed through cognitive debriefing interviews with cancer patients. Results. Eleven domains were selected from the literature review: physical, role, social, psychological, patient care and support, healthcare, information, financial, activities of daily living, spirituality, and sexuality. A scientific committee created 15 items and five questions. Two Delphi rounds were required to reach a consensus among the 29 experts on a pilot version. Twenty-three cancer patients were involved in the cognitive debriefing interviews. All items and questions were considered as relevant. Acceptability was good, and four items were reformulated based on patients' comments. Conclusion. This brief French tool has a very good content validity and can be used in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cancer patients (CPs) are considered more vulnerable and as a high mortality group regarding COVID-19. In this analysis, we aimed to describe asymptomatic COVID (+) CPs and associated factors. Methods: We conducted a prospective study in CPs and health care workers (HCWs) in 4 French cancer centers (PAPESCO [ PAtients et PErsonnels de Santé des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer pendant l'épidémie de COvid-19 ] study). This analysis used data recorded between June 17, 2020 and November 30, 2020 in CPs (first 2 waves, no variants). At inclusion and quarterly, CPs reported the presence of predefined COVID-19 symptoms and had a blood rapid diagnostic test; a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was done in case of suspected infection. Results: A total 878 CPs were included; COVID-19 prevalence was similar in both CPs (8%) and HCWs (9.5%); of the 70 CPs (8%) who were COVID (+), 29 (41.4%) were and remained asymptomatic; 241/808 of the COVID (−) (29.8%) were symptomatic. 18 COVID (+) were hospitalized (2% of CPs), 1 in intensive care unit (ICU) and 1 died (0.1% of CPs and 2.4% of symptomatic COVID [+] CPs). Only the inclusion center was associated with clinical presentation (in Nancy, Angers, Nantes, and Clermont-Ferrand: 65.4%, 35%, 28.6%, and 10% CPs were asymptomatic, respectively). Conclusions: Seroprevalence of COVID-19 in CPs was similar to that observed in HCWs; mortality related to COVID-19 among CPs was 0.1%. More than 40% of COVID (+) CPs were asymptomatic and one third of COVID (−) CPs had symptoms. Only geographic origin was associated with the presence or absence of symptoms. Social distancing and protective measures must be applied in CPs at home and when hospitalized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This article presents a comparison of the changes of Posttraumatic Growth (PTG) in breast cancer and melanoma patients over a 2-year follow-up period and investigates the associations between coping strategies, anxiety, depression, emotional functioning, and PTG over time. Method: Seventy-eight early stage melanoma patients from Nantes University Hospital and 215 breast cancer patients from Nantes Cancerology Institute completed self-administered questionnaires collecting sociodemographic and medical information and assessing health-related quality of life, coping strategies, anxiety and depression within 1 month of diagnosis and 6, 12, and 24 months after the diagnosis. PTG was assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months postdiagnosis. Results: We found that PTG increased over time for both cancers, but that breast cancer and melanoma patients did not experience the same magnitude of changes in PTG depending on time and on depression. While we did not find any relationship between anxiety, emotional functioning, negative coping and PTG; positive and emotional coping were positively associated with PTG changes for both cancers. Substance use was negatively related to PTG at 2 years postdiagnosis for melanoma and breast cancer. Conclusions: Our findings reveal that PTG increases over time for both cancers. In addition, it provides relevant information about the coping strategies that are associated with the experience of positive changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: COVID-19 has some clinical manifestations that are similar to the side effects of cancer treatments such that cancer patients may fail to distinguish COVID-19 symptoms from those of their treatments. The PAPESCO-19 study investigated 13 COVID-19 symptoms and confirmed that in combination with anorexia, fever, headache, and rhinorrhea, anosmia has a strong association with COVID-19 for cancer patients while dysgeusia/ageusia does not. Background: Cancer patients may fail to distinguish COVID-19 symptoms such as anosmia, dysgeusia/ageusia, anorexia, headache, and fatigue, which are frequent after cancer treatments. We aimed to identify symptoms associated with COVID-19 and to assess the strength of their association in cancer and cancer-free populations. Methods: The multicenter cohort study PAPESCO-19 included 878 cancer patients and 940 healthcare workers (HCWs). At baseline and quarterly thereafter, they reported the presence or absence of 13 COVID-19 symptoms observed over 3 months and the results of routine screening RT-PCR, and they were systematically tested for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. We identified the symptom combinations significantly associated with COVID-19. Results: Eight percent of cancer patients were COVID-19 positive, and 32% were symptomatic. Among the HCWs, these proportions were 9.5 and 52%, respectively. Anosmia, anorexia, fever, headache, and rhinorrhea together accurately discriminated (c-statistic = 0.7027) COVID-19 cases from cancer patients. Anosmia, dysgeusia/ageusia, muscle pain, intense fatigue, headache, and chest pain better discriminated (c-statistic = 0.8830) COVID-19 cases among the HCWs. Anosmia had the strongest association in both the cancer patients (OR = 7.48, 95% CI: 2.96–18.89) and HCWs (OR = 5.71, 95% CI: 2.21–14.75). Conclusions: COVID-19 symptoms and their diagnostic performance differ in the cancer patients and HCWs. Anosmia is associated with COVID-19 in cancer patients, while dysgeusia/ageusia is not. Cancer patients deserve tailored preventive measures due to their particular COVID-19 symptom pattern. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]