Search

Background: Hydrated electrons, which are short‐lived products of radiolysis in water, increase the optical absorption of water, providing a pathway toward near‐tissue‐equivalent clinical radiation dosimeters. This has been demonstrated in high‐dose‐per‐pulse radiochemistry research, but, owing to the weak absorption signal, its application in existing low‐dose‐per‐pulse radiotherapy provided by clinical linear accelerators (linacs) has yet to be investigated. Purpose: The aims of this study were to measure the optical absorption associated with hydrated electrons produced by clinical linacs and to assess the suitability of the technique for radiotherapy (⩽ 1 cGy per pulse) applications. Methods: 40 mW of 660‐nm laser light was sent five passes through deionized water contained in a 10×4×$\times 4\times$2 cm3 glass‐walled cavity by using four broadband dielectric mirrors, two on each side of the cavity. The light was collected with a biased silicon photodetector. The water cavity was then irradiated by a Varian TrueBeam linac with both photon (10 MV FFF, 6 MV FFF, 6 MV) and electron beams (6 MeV) while monitoring the transmitted laser power for absorption transients. Radiochromic EBT3 film measurements were also performed for comparison. Results: Examination of the absorbance profiles showed clear absorption changes in the water when radiation pulses were delivered. Both the amplitude and the decay time of the signal appeared consistent with the absorbed dose and the characteristics of the hydrated electrons. By using literature value for the hydrated electron radiation chemical yield (3.0±0.3), we inferred doses of 2.1±0.2 mGy (10 MV FFF), 1.3±0.1 mGy (6 MV FFF), 0.45±0.06 mGy (6 MV) for photons, and 0.47±0.05 mGy (6 MeV) for electrons, which differed from EBT3 film measurements by 0.6%, 0.8%, 10%, and 15.7%, respectively. The half‐life of the hydrated electrons in the solution was ∼ 24 μ$\umu$s. Conclusions: By measuring 660‐nm laser light transmitted through a cm‐scale, multi‐pass water cavity, we observed absorption transients consistent with hydrated electrons generated by clinical linac radiation. The agreement between our inferred dose and EBT3 film measurements suggests this proof‐of‐concept system represents a viable pathway toward tissue‐equivalent dosimeters for clinical radiotherapy applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To quantify and verify the dosimetric impact of high‐dose rate (HDR) source positional uncertainty in brachytherapy, and to introduce a model for three‐dimensional (3D) position tracking of the HDR source based on a two‐dimensional (2D) measurement. This model has been utilized for the development of a comprehensive source quality assurance (QA) method using radiochromic film (RCF) dosimetry including assessment of different digitization uncertainties. Methods: An algorithm was developed and verified to generate 2D dose maps of the mHDR‐V2 192Ir source (Elekta, Veenendaal, Netherlands) based on the AAPM TG‐43 formalism. The limits of the dosimetric error associated with source (0.9 mm diameter) positional uncertainty were evaluated and experimentally verified with EBT3 film measurements for 6F (2.0 mm diameter) and 4F (1.3 mm diameter) size catheters at the surface (4F, 6F) and 10 mm further (4F only). To quantify this uncertainty, a source tracking model was developed to incorporate the unique geometric features of all isodose lines (IDLs) within any given 2D dose map away from the source. The tracking model normalized the dose map to its maximum, then quantified the IDLs using blob analysis based on features such as area, perimeter, weighted centroid, elliptic orientation, and circularity. The Pearson correlation coefficients (PCCs) between these features and source coordinates (x, y, z, θy, θz) were calculated. To experimentally verify the accuracy of the tracking model, EBT3 film pieces were positioned within a Solid Water® (SW) phantom above and below the source and they were exposed simultaneously. Results: The maximum measured dosimetric variations on the 6F and 4F catheter surfaces were 39.8% and 36.1%, respectively. At 10 mm further, the variation reduced to 2.6% for the 4F catheter which is in agreement with the calculations. The source center (x, y) was strongly correlated with the low IDL‐weighted centroid (PCC = 0.99), while the distance to source (z) was correlated with the IDL areas (PCC = 0.96) and perimeters (PCC = 0.99). The source orientation θy was correlated with the difference between high and low IDL‐weighted centroids (PCC = 0.98), while θz was correlated with the elliptic orientation of the 60–90% IDLs (PCC = 0.97) for a maximum distance of z = 5 mm. Beyond 5 mm, IDL circularity was significant, therefore limiting the determination of θz (PCC ≤ 0.48). The measured positional errors from the film sets above and below the source indicated a source position at the bottom of the catheter (−0.24 ± 0.07 mm). Conclusions: Isodose line features of a 2D dose map away from the HDR source can reveal its spatial coordinates. RCF was shown to be a suitable dosimeter for source tracking and dosimetry. This technique offers a novel source QA method and has the potential to be used for QA of commercial and customized applicators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To introduce a model that reproducibly linearizes the response from radiochromic film (RCF) dosimetry systems at extended dose range. To introduce a correction method, generated from the same scanned images, which corrects for scanner temporal response variation and scanner bed inhomogeneity. Methods: Six calibration curves were established for different lot numbers of EBT3 GAFCHROMIC™ film model based on four EPSON scanners [10000XL (2 units), 11000XL, 12000XL] at three different centers. These films were calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water based on TG51 protocol or TRS398 with dose ranges up to 40 Gy. The film response was defined in terms of a proposed normalized pixel value (nPVRGB) as a summation of first‐order equations based on information from red, green, and blue channels. The fitting parameters of these equations are chosen in a way that makes the film response equal to dose at the time of calibration. An integrated set of correction factors (one per color channel) was also introduced. These factors account for the spatial and temporal changes in scanning states during calibration and measurements. The combination of nPVRGB and this "fingerprint" correction formed the basis of this new protocol and it was tested against net optical density (netODX=R,G,B) single‐channel dosimetry in terms of accuracy, precision, scanner response variability, scanner bed inhomogeneity, noise, and long‐term stability. Results: Incorporating multichannel features (RGB) into the normalized pixel value produced linear response to absorbed dose (slope of 1) in all six RCF dosimetry systems considered in this study. The "fingerprint" correction factors of each of these six systems displayed unique patterns at the time of calibration. The application of nPVRGB to all of these six systems could achieve a level of accuracy of ± 2.0% in the dose range of interest within modeled uncertainty level of 2.0%–3.0% depending on the dose level. Consistent positioning of control and measurement film pieces and integrating the multichannel correction into the response function formalism mitigated possible scanner response variations of as much as ± 10% at lower doses and scanner bed inhomogeneity of ± 8% to the established level of uncertainty at the time of calibration. The system was also able to maintain the same level of accuracy after 3 and 6 months post calibration. Conclusions: Combining response linearity with the integrated correction for scanner response variation lead to a sustainable and practical RCF dosimetry system that mitigated systematic response shifts and it has the potential to reduce errors in reporting relative information from the film response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Intraoperative radiotherapy using The INTRABEAM System (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany), a miniature low‐energy x‐ray source, has proven to be an effective modality in the treatment of breast cancer. However, some uncertainties remain in its dosimetry. In this work, we investigated the INTRABEAM system dosimetry by performing ionization chamber and radiochromic film measurements of absorbed dose in a water phantom. Methods: Ionization chamber measurements were performed with a PTW 34013 parallel‐plate soft x‐ray chamber at source to detector distances of 5 to 30 mm calculated using (a) the dose formula consistent with the TARGIT breast protocol (TARGIT), (b) the formula recommended by the manufacturer (Zeiss), and (c) the recently proposed C Q formalism of Watson et al. (Physics in Medicine & Biology, 2018;63:015016) EBT3 Gafchromic film measurements were made at the same depths in water. To account for the energy dependence of EBT3 film, multiple dose response calibration curves were employed across a range of photon beam qualities relevant to the INTRABEAM spectrum in water. Results: At all depths investigated, the TARGIT dose was significantly lower than that measured by the Zeiss and C Q methods, as well as film. These dose differences ranged from 14% to as large as 80%. In general, the doses measured by film, and the Zeiss and C Q methods were in good agreement to within measurement uncertainties (5–6%). Conclusions: These results suggest that the TARGIT dose underestimates the physical dose to water from the INTRABEAM source. Understanding the correlation between the TARGIT and physical dose is important for any studies wishing to make dosimetric comparisons between the INTRABEAM and other radiation emitting devices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The authors investigated the energy response of XR-QA2 GafChromicTM film over a broad energy range used in diagnostic radiology examinations. The authors also made an assessment of the most suitable functions for both reference and relative dose measurements. Methods: Pieces of XR-QA2 film were irradiated to nine different values of air kerma in air, following reference calibration of a number of beam qualities ranging in HVLs from 0.16 to 8.25 mm Al, which corresponds to effective energy range from 12.7 keV to 56.3 keV. For each beam quality, the authors tested three functional forms (rational, linear exponential, and power) to assess the most suitable function by fitting the delivered air kerma in air as a function of film response in terms of reflectance change. The authors also introduced and tested a new parameter ? = netΔR · em netΔR that linearizes the inherently nonlinear response of the film. Results: The authors have found that in the energy range investigated, the response of the XR-QA2 based radiochromic film dosimetry system ranges from 0.222 to 0.420 in terms of netΔR at Kair air = 8 cGy. For beam qualities commonly used in CT scanners (4.03-8.25 mm Al), the variation in film response (netΔR at Kair air = 8 cGy) amounts to ± 5%, while variation in Kair air amounts to ± 14%. Conclusions: Results of our investigation revealed that the use of XR-QA2 GafChromicTM film is accompanied by a rather pronounced energy dependent response for beam qualities used for x-ray based diagnostic imaging purposes. The authors also found that the most appropriate function for the reference radiochromic film dosimetry would be the power function, while for the relative dosimetry one may use the exponential response function that can be easily linearized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High-finesse microcavities offer a platform for compact, high-precision sensing by employing high-reflectivity, low-loss mirrors to create effective optical path lengths that are orders of magnitude larger than the device geometry. Here, we investigate the radiation hardness of Fabry-Pérot microcavities formed from dielectric mirrors deposited on the tips of optical fibers. The microcavities are irradiated under both conventional (∼ 0.1 Gy/s) and ultrahigh (FLASH, ∼ 20 Gy/s) radiotherapy dose rates. Within our measurement sensitivity of ∼ 40 ppm loss, we observe no degradation in the mirror absorption after irradiation with over 300 Gy accumulated dose. This result highlights the excellent radiation hardness of the dielectric mirrors forming the cavities, enabling new optics-based, real-time, in-vivo, tissue-equivalent radiation dosimeters with ∼ 10 micron spatial resolution (our motivation), as well as other applications in high-radiation environments.

Purpose: To quantify and verify the dosimetric impact of high-dose rate (HDR) source positional uncertainty in brachytherapy, and to introduce a model for three-dimensional (3D) position tracking of the HDR source based on a two-dimensional (2D) measurement. This model has been utilized for the development of a comprehensive source quality assurance (QA) method using radiochromic film (RCF) dosimetry including assessment of different digitization uncertainties., Methods: An algorithm was developed and verified to generate 2D dose maps of the mHDR-V2 192 Ir source (Elekta, Veenendaal, Netherlands) based on the AAPM TG-43 formalism. The limits of the dosimetric error associated with source (0.9 mm diameter) positional uncertainty were evaluated and experimentally verified with EBT3 film measurements for 6F (2.0 mm diameter) and 4F (1.3 mm diameter) size catheters at the surface (4F, 6F) and 10 mm further (4F only). To quantify this uncertainty, a source tracking model was developed to incorporate the unique geometric features of all isodose lines (IDLs) within any given 2D dose map away from the source. The tracking model normalized the dose map to its maximum, then quantified the IDLs using blob analysis based on features such as area, perimeter, weighted centroid, elliptic orientation, and circularity. The Pearson correlation coefficients (PCCs) between these features and source coordinates (x, y, z, θ y , θ z ) were calculated. To experimentally verify the accuracy of the tracking model, EBT3 film pieces were positioned within a Solid Water® (SW) phantom above and below the source and they were exposed simultaneously., Results: The maximum measured dosimetric variations on the 6F and 4F catheter surfaces were 39.8% and 36.1%, respectively. At 10 mm further, the variation reduced to 2.6% for the 4F catheter which is in agreement with the calculations. The source center (x, y) was strongly correlated with the low IDL-weighted centroid (PCC = 0.99), while the distance to source (z) was correlated with the IDL areas (PCC = 0.96) and perimeters (PCC = 0.99). The source orientation θ y was correlated with the difference between high and low IDL-weighted centroids (PCC = 0.98), while θ z was correlated with the elliptic orientation of the 60-90% IDLs (PCC = 0.97) for a maximum distance of z = 5 mm. Beyond 5 mm, IDL circularity was significant, therefore limiting the determination of θ z (PCC ≤ 0.48). The measured positional errors from the film sets above and below the source indicated a source position at the bottom of the catheter (-0.24 ± 0.07 mm)., Conclusions: Isodose line features of a 2D dose map away from the HDR source can reveal its spatial coordinates. RCF was shown to be a suitable dosimeter for source tracking and dosimetry. This technique offers a novel source QA method and has the potential to be used for QA of commercial and customized applicators., (© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)